do what i mean. there's a, there's a pump. i shot the, the thing, the entity here and all of the international hungary reveals to serbia. europe is apparently making preparations for potentially entering the conflict of a new prey. household nato calls on its allies to allow the key of the strikes deep inside the russian federation. celebrating itself as africa day is marked across the continent. modern day achievements of independence and writings to the shock of colonialism. also in the program is america at a tipping point of view. west billy, it says the charges of, of civil war and the states is now up to 40 percent. however, experts say that number is low, things might get a realistic i think the probability is more in the 70 to 80 percent because we,

we don't even have free and fair elections in our country, consensus frames and elections. definitely not the case in america called the utility because nothing type of really changes the live on the world wide the off the international mothership in moscow. and it seems ukraine might be facing an escalation because preparations are apparently under way in brussels for europe to potentially enter the conflict in ukraine. that apparently is what the so being president says was revealed to him by the hon. gary and prime minister are open said that in brussels preparations are on the way for europe's entry into the wall. he said hungry should strengthen its defensive capabilities. i've talked about this with victor twice. of course, he has intelligence from nato, which i don't have, according to my estimates, everything will be much more complicated and much worse. and it may happen that we

will have a great tragedy than in the 2nd world war. i wish i was wrong. i am afraid that we are approaching a great world conflict in the context of president food you just said he's been given this information by a victoria, but who is a nasal member serve you nothing. and they know that there are preparations for an intervention or an intervention of sorts. now, victor, oregon has publicly said among other things that he will not facilitate this intervention. we do not approve of this. and we do not want to participate in financial assistance and military support for ukraine, even within nato. our lawyers and staff are working to determine how hungry can exist as a member of nato without participating at the same time in nato's actions outside the alliance. so again, this said boy, lot in the sphere in europe now looking for an avenue to deflect away from probably what's happening on the battlefield. in addition to that, again, we have your install berg, the, the, you know,

hapless head of nato. suggesting that we should allow ukraine a strike targets within inside russia. it's of a listen to what you and stopped in. burke said in relation to opening the game, opening up the game plan for the allies of you find that to allow them to play weapons, to strike deep inside russia. that's some of this. oddly, the time i was calling for allies to consider whether she list. ready some of the restrictions dying post on a weapons donated to ukraine because we need to remember what this is. this is a world russian partnership against the graeme and i still have to defend themselves. and that includes also the striking targets on the russian territory. and then of course, if you deny of ukraine, the right to fits means their targets on a russian territory. then you make it very hard for them to uphold the right for self. defense is self defense. self defense is trying to new instructor is the goal . it's legitimate, and we are helping ukraine with upholding that right. and that should include the

ability to also strike targets on russian territory. course there's the western allies supporting you. try and russia has her realize, a rush as her friends will of, of course, being the biggest manufacturing economy, the biggest navy on the chinese in the east. but it also has villarille's a very, very familiar ally, of course with russia and put has consistently said in his tucker carlson, interviewed every entry i've seen him give over the last 2 years since the start of the special manager. and he said, we're ready to pull. he continue when he refers to the fact that they, we're talking until bar johnson pulled zalinski away from the table almost literally at many weeks after the beginning of the complex. now let's have a listen to what he said in minsk. mean, to me, of course we realize that and the legitimacy of the current head of state is over. who to negotiate with this is of course a fair question. i agree with you. i think that one of the goals of the conference that has been announced the conference in switzerland is precisely to have the

western community and the sponsors of the current version confirmed the legitimacy of the incumbent head of state or the inactive one. but these p steps, they do not matter for legal documents, of course. so we would need, if it comes to that, and i proceed from the fact that piece books shouldn't be resumed. nobody felt it made sense, but with common sense. and they shouldn't be based on common sense. but if it comes to that, of course, we need to understand who we can deal with in order to get to the signing of legally binding documents. and then we need to be fully confident that we are dealing with legitimate authorities. and it's interesting in the context of lot i'm approved as recent re election, the western press going into overdrive because over 80 percent of the russian population voted from. nobody seems to want to look into the list of how the villagers, lensky is now essentially a dictator. and he actually made comments yesterday that he's not that worried what people think about the fact that he's not elected. meantime, italy does not support the nato chase proposal to allow key of

a strike inside russian territory with weapons from the block of the nation's foreign minister. and tony. i'll take john to either the if lee would not be sending its own troops to ukraine. we spoke earlier in the program with, so it'd be in american journalism. the boys have knowledge and he says it's no surprise that western partners would seek an escalation and the upcoming so called peace conference in switzerland as 0 relevance without russia's points of what we have seen over the past 2 years. and over the past 10 years to be frank is the dates of this pattern of escalation from the west in which, you know, they, they keep doing these things that were on imaginable unconscionable just a few months ago. and then just pretend that it's always been this way and it's perfectly normal and just carry on and, you know, they will just cover up their actions by declaring, oh no, no, this is perfectly legal because we say so. and pretend that this is how the world works and that will be part of the reason this conflict is going on is that the will doesn't work that way. and, and wally on one hand, it's pretty clear that the right view of the russians are being reasonable while

the west is being aggressive. the problem is that so called peace planned by vladimir zalinski used one giant force method is absolutely 0 point and holding peace talks without the other belligerent. do you normally, you negotiate with the enemy not, not with below potential allies. and even then, you know, the people have, do it, have been invited to this conference are basically the same countries that have been supporting t f for the past several years. so what is the purpose of this? so they can all sit together and praise themselves as a, as that's how much they support ukraine. it's pointless. it's meaningless. it's absurd. it's just another junket for all of these officials to pocket a whole bunch of money and do some shopping while in the west. and for westerners to pad themselves on the backend, congratulate themselves with how own, how pro ukrainian they are. but there's nothing to be achieved from this in practice. could that be with us, with this program here, or nazi and celebrating the confidence which diversity event. and so being taking

place on a whole host of countries, tamaqua africa day off, he's a lot of work on good looking back at the significance of this global celebration, a wasted in countries. lots of believe that they had the clipped the african continent with the capability to achieve feed them. but today, more than 60 years, often the last 2 open countries relinquish, be a colonial themes. the continent to silver do to, to would see until more. but why so, and have those for my mazda is really going to wait, african nations believe that the soviet, but under a different disguise, and grievances between the continent and the width of heidi? so what, what did you could issue? are you saying that the chinese or the russians behaved better than us westerners currently? oh, absolutely. you don't quite understand african realities. it's astonishing to see how we are very distant in terms of cultures. we cannot understand why you come to give us lessons, for example, on human rights, because one of the main problems is that wisdom the to seem to be reluctant to

understand african realities. prime example, germany and the u. k was speaking strict limits on the import of hunting trophies, because of coaching conserves, seems honorable, right? but they have never had to deal with elephant over population like blue one. it is very easy to sit in bowie and then have an opinion about our affairs and books, swanner. we are paying the price for preserving these on the most of the world. the greens look at us with contempt. i want brandon's to have a taste of living alongside al events which are overwhelming my country. in some areas, there are more of these beasts than people elephant numbers just like those of scottish stags had to be controlled. hunters in the highlands paid to shoot deer and put their handlers on their walls. so why is britain trying to stop after doing the same botswana is the most successful country in the world? looking after elephant buffalo and lions,

we don't want colonial interference from britain. wisdom countries not only fail to understand africa, they are accused of driving it into economy, the speed. the main reason there is no growth in africa is that the growth factors are neither funded nor understood. our populations are increasing, but our economies are stunted. the i d a should tell us why they are funding the modern slavery of africans. and we should address issues like why africa is producing what it does not consume and consuming what it does not produce to keep africa. and it's some sanctions under really pub it to read in areas seems to be something they don't shy away from zimbabwe. uganda only to name a few. and he said that somebody who lost over a 150000000 dollars last year old because of the sanctions imposed by b u and the united states and uganda was punished overall cost and t l attributed to knows as washington woodville competitors,

preferential trait states of last year, it cannot be right, let alone a healthy basis for conducting international relations or building friendship for a country. however, mightily abuse itself to slander, into some nationals of other nations. well also maligning those same nations for daring to be independent and sovereign. it is therefore unfortunate that the world bank and other actors dare to want to coerce us into a band ending our faith culture principles and sovereignty using money. they really underestimate all africans. so why is the waste so interested in africa when, as a claim, human rights are so bad? well, 12 reason natural resources take a look at the d, f. c. for instance, the country produces more than 60 percent of the both supply of cobalt, which is mind in these comp about tens of thousands of those mine is a children. some die from coal, both mining accidents every year. some even phase sexual assault and full evictions

. wisdom companies among those that have been seen by the deceit, but justice was not delivered as the quotes sided with the lots of apples and a strong incentive to avoid any transparency with their suppliers even as they promised the public. they have 0 tolerance policies against child labor. we are far from finished seeking accountability. what's the glowing danger in africa? according to the united states, just take it in line with the 2022 national defense strategy. the department of defense will engage with african partners to expose and highlight the risks of negative p r c. and russian activities in africa over $300000000.00 were requested by the us state department this year for the fine seconds russia and sign that in the african continent. even though some african countries are way that's continued alignment must go carries the risk of isolation from global markets. why the waste

field is more to gain then to win us of deluxe it. russia helped very, very much. we had a coup attempt in 2020, before the elections. if it were not for the russian military, our state would not exist at the moment. now our citizens can sleep peacefully, at least in the villages, so conquering from sort of not would like to offer my congratulations to you mister president, because all of the decisions that you've taken you've made, you're not going to regret them. because we have managed to secure a great success, not just for the president of the russian federation who has invited us, but it's also a success for african countries because of russia is a winner. everyone is the winner. niger, which is waging a historic struggle for the re conquest of its sovereignty and its development knows how to count on your personal commitment and cooperation with the russian federation to succeed. and it's patriotic fight. on this africa de applicant, the citizens have gradually come to reject wisdom policies to the point of blaming

the former colonizers for menu, off the regions heels, some of the cutting links to the past and embracing a new direction in the future. we according to oddity pretoria that are in the program, i was talking to the minister of foreign affairs, but tons of the january must come, but he says africa's confidence is rising and it will of independently choose its own partnerships. it refuses, as he said, to be a part of our, a renaissance spot of offer because of developing endeavor. but these also to find off $45.00 voice a such so our, our position and, and, and stickle clean. uh, you know, as to where we want to be when we want to work with uh, and the kind of partnership uh that we will find beneficial when uh tons, any, uh, was at the forefront of a lead, very simple southern africa. we deal with all of us in unity. so if you

need to, you was important as we where the see can be quoted as ition. unity is even more important today. uh, because the fact that uh, you know, the independence of africa will continually to be challenged. that still exist. we absolutely do not want to see or self as a point. and it's extremely wrong to see africa as such. and we have the resources for us to be at the center stage of local politics. and they cannot make concrete. and as it always been the case, and there is determination among africans and african leaders to stick off position and to demand respect to us talk to our independence of southern sea. and to be free to choose partners to accept

co uh, development of the, of us with a. so we find it offensive to be asked to choose this one particular partner or the other one. and one of the whole topics of the un security council these days is the expansion of the un security council, which countries you know, shouldn't be allowed to join it. did you just think there's a way that you and security council could, can be fair and transpire and when, when deciding to give africa a voice because it's about time. no, i mean look of, it's got about numbers and it's still, you know, 15 to the countries, the members of what the members of the security council and if 5 permanent members . now if you're spending to $2250.00, uh, but the modus operandi is to say that one country can, uh, you know, choose one direction and all of us have to somehow go along,

along with it. we know we have no choice. so the issue is not the expansion of this it gives to canceled the, the issue is how can we have a system in which the majority carry the day in which the wheeler of the entire family of nations prevail. uh you have 15 members of the united nations security council, but used to have p 5 in these 2 have to be too destructive. now, 3 and 3 most seats for africa in this acute becomes meaningless. so there are the forms that we've spoken about a much the but is not very configuration of the existing architecture without substantive changes or done panda to the protest is

that's the message from john franklin, a democratic senator in america, but he pushes joe biden to back israel, even if at risk of losing votes in the upcoming election of the play columns as pro palestinian demonstrations of grips university campuses across the us. for the last few months. ladies to join, the move wouldn't be iconic. harvard and graduating students voice best of both, a guy said during that commencement this week. meanwhile, on friday, come for some grill top university presidents for the sizing, and some of them will ending the stand offs through negotiations rather than through police force. in the meantime, in american billionaire investor and hedge fund manager has a raised concerns of the us as teetering on the brink of a new type of civil war among the risk. so identified by his researches what value believes is the growing likelihood of the us civil war. the probability of which he puts us somewhere between 35 to 40 percent. the civil war, w,

imagines was not necessarily the one in which people grabbed guns and start shooting. although such a scenario was possible. he said this civil would be one in which people move to different states that are more lined with what they want. and they don't follow the decisions of federal authorities of the opposite political persuasion. the investor also believes the upcoming presidential election will determine whether the existing problems in society will spiral out of control. ray dalio already came back in 2020, that the us was living through a form of civil war saying people were moving states in part because of the political beliefs later, he also claimed the country was usually divided in a terrible financial state, wanting the scope of the problems could trigger some kind of revolution. when a recent poll highlights the current divisions in society, timing almost $1.00 and $4.00 adults nationwide would support that state seceding

from the us. such a sentiment is the most prominent in alaska, california. no surprise, texas. last year at the us, republican congresswoman marjorie taylor green even demanded what she called a national dive force between liberals and conservatives. things we need the national divorce. we need to separated by red states and blue states and strength of the federal government. everyone. i talk to say this from this sick and disgusting will culture issues shutting down all throats to the democrats, treacherous america. last policies, we are done. my colleagues don't corner of it, al it, he took on this conversation with a pair of guests troubles. i would say that we're already in a civil war. if we go by this 1st definition of people moving the states that are more favorable to their, to their liking. but i, i do think that it could get hot, it's a propaganda machine is trying to divide us and frankly,

i see us going more towards the civil war than the 35 to 40 percent. i think the probabilities more in the 70 to 80 percent because we, we don't even have free and fair elections in our country. major spends a lot of time postering and coughing each other when useless, pointless source and knowing that the bigger issues and lots of that they call them around the world. so a lot to do with the white social media works in that space or to grow and costs thinking they were copied you on the side. and yeah, in terms of free and fair elections, definitely not the case in america phone, they do tell you because nothing ever really changes. and then they end up spending our money, huge amounts of taxes. and we have literally a notice i as to where it goes, jo, i'd like to ask you about this, this new film that's a, that's come out about the called civil war, right. would you say that this is a sort of roadmap for what we're set to see in the future or just some sort of hollywood fantasy? most of the things that have come out of hollywood have been things that they've engineered going to the future. and they, they driven, they try to judge the,

the public's perception and, or reaction to such events. and the united states were starting to, as people realize who is the threat to the american people who is trying to thrust us into a war outside the united states. with other nations, and that's the leadership is feckless group of leadership, both on the left and the right. and it's not just in the united states, as inspection of evil leadership has permeated across the world. and we have it's, it's one of the reasons why it's so dangerous for the united states, not to be held accountable. and while we were talking about the un, we're, we're talking about, you know, nato partners and nobody wants to stand up to the class bully, that's what the united states as has the cup, has become on all of the world stages. britton's days of being financial. how house are over and the upcoming government will have a mess on his hands, trying to rescue an economy with one bad option, offer another race taxes, cut, spending, borrow more. and according to the institute, whole fiscal studies london has to face reality. while really soon i highlighted

inflation dropping to 2 percent of the contributor chris evans had a good laugh over the the inflation was, you know, he did this thing he does, which is quite weird. well, yeah, it's like after high school math teacher and like, draws a job and then puts it on youtube. so we did that for his instagram for some reason . but when he did it, he's trying to save it. he, he's been better than anyone else in time in terms of tracking in place and down. but if you look across the globe, inflation has been cops the 1st in the us and then it's sort of like a trigger effect around the world. so really no one really knows what he's trying to say here, and he hasn't done anything specifically himself to do this, but he's trying to claim it in place. us pull them. but of course it remains above the bank of england a target. and this is just not the time for a victory lap and popping champagne colts because this is not move in line from a golf. it's about family finances and the choices of the 14 years of conception,

the working families and pensioners of phil was off the right to reach the who is the, is the, the, the shot of charles, the i for our use on the, on the meet with you pay politics, she would be the next person in charge of the countries finances, choose uh parts of the labor pots when the election, which makes a very, very good point. i mean, i put some numbers here just to give me the looking down for a sec. but you know, if we look at the u. k, the government gross debt to $2380000000.00 pounds, which is somebody around that $2700000000.00, which is, which is a huge, huge amount for a country as smooth as the u. k. a not that equates to a 102.8 percent of u k, g d p. which means that the government is spending more than servicing. it says that it's actually bringing in, in terms of revenue. so not, not issue with wisdom that you can't, it's not i have, it's the u. k. u k brakes. it said you can have a massive my guy seen crisis is suffering from either the population which su next

. government has failed to detail in spite of promising to be an expert that they would, the, i'm a big predicts that the u. k. well, the growth of the u. k. in 2024 would only be your queen 7th as sense. right. and then it goes up to 1.5 percent, but this is still tiny. if we look at the full, the global financial across the u. k. company consistently grew by around 2.75 percent, which is why there was so much for an investment that was driven into particularly longer. so i think we'll, we'll, we'll see that and then let's compare that to russia. right. rest of the russian economy is growing exponentially. foster, in spite of western sciences, which was suppose to put what price russia. why do you think soon act decided to make a statement specifically about low inflation right before these elections? what, what kind of benefit does was he trying to get from it? but the truth is, the people you try and living through a terrible cost of living prices. you know that bills for the energy bills because of the u. k. government's policy on ukraine. not buying russian oil and gas and has cost a massive,

massive content on the economy since the 1980s. the u. k. hasn't really produced much itself. it let alone doesn't actually take advantage of all of exploits. it's own oil and gas reserves. so that's caused people to really very softly, you didn't, there are people in the u. k. don't you know, i'm from that and talking to somebody at home. there are people that have to go to these places. good food binds, which is where they basically pick up free through the so native by charities and people are turning that need some of the home because they can't afford the heat that holds the bills of going up to a some places more than 3 times the price and the way the full the come fix the credit again. so i think he's trying to tell people that keep by, to me, stay with me because things are going to get better. but the truth is, in my opinion, things are when you're going to get was the climate change, or is it the west rushing? it's green gender? well, the narrative is the danger. that's according to american climate, told her just judith card at the altar of a climate of uncertainty and risk. what was an interesting story?

it's being covered in the latest episode of going on the ground with option or a tendency being bro costs throughout all to you for the next 24 hours. right now here's a step for you as well. there's a very big difference between a scientific consensus and a consensus of scientists. you know, something like the earth orbit. so some that's a well known fact. you don't need to talk about consensus when you hear talk about consensus is probably means that some politicians are you know, looking for scientific evidence that will support their preferred policies. and the words that an, i mean the ip c c was asked to seek consensus about climate change to support the un agenda. and in order to do so, they carefully selected people who would, you know, promote those particular idea of

a completely marginalized natural climate variability. and in order to enforce a consensus, they had to demonize anybody who challenged it and they became called deniers or whatever. so it's just a very bad situation, not just for science, but also for policy making. the so called manufacturing of scientific consensus to support political objectives. well, international development age for the last several decades has been tied to the climate change agenda to eliminate fossil fuel emissions. money that used to be used to eradicate, try to eat radically aid poverty and reduce vulnerability to extreme weather. about some help you eliminate world hunger. i mean, all of that has been, is now ignored in the zeal to illuminate fossil fuels. and you know,

there's 4000000000 people on the planet, mostly in africa, who don't have access to grid electricity and more people in africa. they do have a funding, coal of petroleum resources. but they don't, they need loans to build the infrastructure to actually use it. you know, to develop a grid electricity and they can't get the loans, you know, from europeans. and then we're all banks because they don't want to fund any fossil fuel projects to what it was just a few months ago. the russian architect side as the gate of briefings the president was out of my food and where they told him the authors going through a normal traditional 10000 year booming site. so when it comes to the old narrative of climate change, make sure you question with with us here at the

top is the also the by dealing with difficult people for them to, to places look at the way and i missed it by the name to the that's what it's called, web team go down without it need to be a 3. i don't know, but actually i did a bunch of of websites, but actually not similar. huh. no.