the the, the moss coast as the koreans west and back as a direct participants in the war. and that's us. why didn't green lights the use of may to weapons to swipe deep within russian territory. if they can do this to me, they can do this to anyone. we have a president and a group of fascist that don't want to do it and think about it done on the farm claims is port conviction was crossed into the office, treated by president biden. and an effort this copy of his re election dates are we get reactions on the ground. punch is crazy. you know that the whole world is looking at us saying, what's going on over there in america, the greatest country in the world. we're going to have a cell or possibly have a cell on it does. is it just a system stuff with other people in jail and the wells law just

democratic exercise enters the final straight will the result of india is weeks long general election due to be revealed on tuesday, the by the 6 pm in moscow. welcome to the latest updates on our do international. i a michael quarter guilty of ramping up war hysteria. that's the charge that the crumbling has leveled, had the west and then becomes as a you create an m p, reveal to friends. many 3 instructors are set to be on the a way to key a while washington has admitted it's given. you create the green lights to use its weapons to strike into russia. over the past few weeks, ukraine came to us and asked for the authorization to use weapons that were providing to defend against this aggression, including against the russian forces that are massing on the russian side of the

border and then attacking into ukraine. and that went right to the president, and as you've heard, he's approved use of our weapons for that, for that purpose and going forward they'll continue to do what we've been doing, which is as necessary, adapt and adjust. and that, as i said, has been a hallmark of our engagement. it will continue to be not war mongering tone was said by nature chief dentist told him, but earlier this week he urged west in countries to authorize the district strike russian territory. and the problem to the number of european countries to about the plan. moscow says ukraine has long been attacking russia with need to weapons leaning the west. it's already directly involved in the war, kill them, kill them in general, american made weapons are already being used for an attempted strikes on russian

territory. it is more than eloquent evidence of the extent of the united states involvement in this conflict. there is also an absolute build up of pro war sentiment in the you. they are deliberately full mentoring, pre war hysteria. but all of this of course can not but have a very negative impact on the overall situations of tensions continue to escalate to, to close as it was all vs the nato members were lying and putting up a smoke screen making up a story that they had not yet decided whether or not to allow the key of regime to launch strikes using western weapons on russian territory in the same way they mislead those. they trying to drag to the conference in switzerland by telling tales about its peaceful settlement, classic nato style manipulation. well, one thing this whole affair proves to us is that the width is very good at saying one thing and doing another. it seems the white house press corps knows a whole lot more about what's happening in the oval office and the president

himself. the inconsistency within the binding, the administration on this is alarming. the u. s. policy has been that ukraine cannot use us weapons destroyed targets in russia, in the midst of this proxy war with russia. this policy has been at least one reasonable attempt to limit escalation of hostilities with this change in policy. the bite in administration is risk and even further serious escalation, the consequences of which could be world war 3. a bargain secretly gave you friend permission to strike inside of russia with us weapons, an escalation that could lead us to direct will with russia know totally does the job. i didn't have dementia, he's insane. the west should be pursuing peace, not world war, and me while back in europe, the germans, the french, and the polls are all falling over each other to give permission to use their weapons across the border and worship were given the reality that ukrainian drones had been bombing place like moscow corps and cries another someone should really be given these guys a geography less

a new invest exact. and although we're staying exactly within the same framework, we think that we should allow them to neutralize the military sites from which the missiles are fired. and basically, the military sites from which you crane is attacked miller than the ones on several countries, including germany, have reached cleared agreements with ukraine on the use of western weapons. such a defensive struggle is not limited to one's own national territory, but can of course, also be extended to the aggressive national territory. freedom of the goals, those come belong to them, because we always weapons that we're transferring to ukraine to not have any use restrictions. greetings can fight the way they want, and i think this is a very, very important aspect of this donation mode. again, the crane can use what we have transferred, including beyond this mode, as that is for purposes in russia, if it complies with international law, so that i'm approved himself recently spelled out the reality when it comes to price capacity to wage war beyond its borders. so basically those who have elizabeth, which nettles eventually then this type precision long range weapons cannot be

launched without using space recognizance. in addition, the final target choice and the so called flight mission can only be made by highly qualified specialist based on this technical intelligence who is doing this. this is done by those who produce and allegedly supply the systems to ukraine. the scan and does happen without the participation of ukrainian military personnel. and other systems are also being prepared on the basis of space exploration, and are automatically brought to the appropriate calculation. so this task is being prepared not by ukrainian service men, but by representatives of nato countries. but these representatives of nato countries, especially in europe, they should generally be aware of what they are playing with. they should remember that this is as a rule, a states with a small territory and a very dense population. and this is a factor that they should keep in mind before talking about striking deep into russian territory. this is a serious matter, and we are of course, watching it very carefully, that i show the se, so as lot of my uprooting on lines, the west, that escalation can run both ways. thankfully,

there seems to be at least some voices of reason left in europe. and as usual, those voices have hung gary and the axis issue that one of the hostile creates. we did not create such a mission, let's say a nato ukraine mission, by interfering in the military conflict outside and they tow territory and creating a world war threats with this. it is upset that nato, in order to protect us with trap us as a member of states in a world war. this is just as absurd as if a 5 and decides to put out a file with a tool up. so we think that with all these proposals and all these ideas, nato will always take a new and ever greater step in the direction of entering this war. 2 and a half years ago, we decided together that nato cannot be a part of this war. and it is not allowed to have a direct confrontation between nato and russia. well, now nato is getting closer and closer to a direct confrontation, not only politically, but also physically. what seems that the western political leads prolonging this

conflict. see only one roof, ford. and despite the risks of a wider war in europe, that route is escalation. unfortunately, it seems that while there is a single ukrainian left standing to do their bidding, they intend to keep the fires of war burning and to the capital of hungary. now, with thousands of demons, traders have taken to the streets to protest nato's involvement and the ukrainian conflict. now knocks out no more. that's the clear message in budapest during the bill. so named peace, march of the crowds are in support of victor all bonds, policies, and oppose nato's actions, which they believe is provoking why the war in europe or the front minister is expected to address the crowds later this sack today. and to us part the politics. now donald trump claims as his court conviction this week in new york has a direct attend or was directed by president body and did tell people he's ron,

the white house. trump was found guilty of falsifying business records and the so called costs money trial. and he says the entire case was rig. and if they can do this to me, they can do this to anyone. and we have a president and a group of fascist, don't want to do anything about it. it's a rig. it was a rig trial. we wanted a venue change where we could have a fair trial. we didn't get it. we wanted a judge judge, we wanted a judge, it was in conflicted. you're so what happened to some of the witnesses that were on our side? they were literally crucified by this man who looks like an angel, but he's really a devil. that's how the american system of justice works. as breakfast is dangerous. it's irresponsible for anyone to say this is greg, just because they don't like the verdict. well, we're here on 5th avenue in manhattan in front of trump tower,

where there are hundreds, possibly thousands of people gather the bulk of whom are trump supporters, and they see this as a miscarriage of justice. now that the reaction of the trial from many people is to call this blatant political ization of the us legal system. many are pointing out for example, that falsifying business records is generally a misdemeanor and not a felony. however, in this case, they made it a felony and donald trump was convicted on $34.00 accounts of it. here's some of the reaction to donald trump's conviction. indeed, great damage was done today to the public's face in the american legal system. for a former president can be criminal, convicted, or such a trivial matter motivated by politics rather than justice. then any one is at risk of a similar fate. today is a shameful day in american history. democrats cheat as they can visit the leads of the opposing party on ridiculous charges predicated on the testimony of

a this bought convicted felon. this was a political exercise, not the legal one. the weaponized nation of our justice system has been the whole mike of a bite and administration. this was a sham show trial. the kangaroo, cool, cool, never stand on appeal. americans deserve better than a sitting us president. what the noise in our justice system against the political opponent will to win an election. now it's also important to know that the charges stem from an alleged payment of a $130000.00 to porn stars. don't worry daniels, it's alleged that parsimony there, calling it was paid to the former pornographic film star and exchange for her not saying things about the former president. now it's worth noting. 8 that uh, that itself is not a crime. the crime would be what he was convicted of was falsifying business records. many of noted that paula jones was paid over $850000.00 by bill clinton,

in the aftermath of law suits for allegations of sexual misconduct. and bill clinton was never charged for that, and that was not considered a crime. but there are bigger legal questions about the case. for example, the jury was told they did not have to agree what crime donald trump had actually committed. they did not have to be unanimous on what crime the president had committed. but as long as they agreed he was guilty of something, their verdict would be considered unanimous. and that raises a lot of questions about how the judge carried out the trial. in the instructions given to the jury, donald trump has been found guilty on all 34 charges and his hash won a trial. and here the judge is telling them they don't have to agree about what the other crime is under circumstances where that not only is what makes this a felony. people are also raising questions about why the judge did not prove via the jurors with copies of their instructions. while they deliberated and determined that donald trump was guilty, they were instead told they could ask the judge to read the instructions again. but

they were not given written copies of the instructions about what they were intended to do, and how they were contented to rule on the case. and that is something that legal scholars also have questions about this as insanity. i have tried many jury trials in my day. you give jurors paper instructions every time. how are 12 jurors supposed to remember the elements and necessary for each of the $34.00 felony counts? this is an elicit which one to prosecution. now at this point, people are wondering what this means for the upcoming us presidential election. donald trump is the presumed domini of the republican party, but the question is, will he be able to run a presidential campaign? his sentencing is that for july 11, he could receive up to 4 years. uh, for each account uh that he is convicted of up to a 136 years in prison for falsifying business records, filing paperwork incorrectly. people are looking at this case and saying,

what comes next? this is certainly unprecedented in american politics. never has a former president of the united states been convicted of a felony. now we took to the streets of new york to gauge the reaction to tom's conviction. and what it might mean for his attempt to get back behind the desk in the oval office. that means honest money. honest. madison's honest media, honest selections, honest energy, honest education. now i don't know what they're thinking all over the world. what they're thinking. we have a look for our country is crazy. you know, that whole world is looking at us saying, what's going on over there in america, the greatest country in the world, and, you know, not too happy with it. you know, i mean, how dare them take a president and, and do this to my next president. i would hope people who are paying attention realize that a felony kind of votes in most states, felons gone vote. we're going to have a feller possibly have

a fell on it sounds as it just a system. stuff with other people in jail on, on the, on the door, the book on board with a fellow with in charge of the system. it makes no sense of a smile on jo biden's face at the white house press briefing. told all about the president's thoughts on his rivals conviction. mister president, can you tell us? or donald trump prefers himself as a political prisoner and blames you directly. what's your response to that, sir? my colleague, you know, neil put john's conviction on the impact of good have on the election to a pint of love. guess to this charge was it originally reviewed by the federal government, the department of justice, and they said no way, we're going to charge him with voter fraud for having a woman sign, a non disclosure agreement. this is in boulder fraud. then the southern district of new york, the us attorney's office said,

we're not going to charge this. then the predecessor sideband, the district attorney said, we're not gonna charge this alvin brag the current buy's proud of the district attorney said, we're not going to charge this. and then as soon as trump started to go up in the pony, they reconsidered it. and this is the 4th time i'm for a criminal prosecution for inundation to civil case. if he is, i dare. oh, he is an absolute one. he has created the trumpet jog or not. they have been peach, tim twice. they could see if there is a way for them to declare him pregnant or in alien they wouldn't do this. he's charges me nothing. he is going to march to re election. he will not be in prison, you will not spend 30 seconds in jail and, and convicted felons can vote after having their civil rights restored this meetings nothing. it's not just in a time to get them off the ballot,

right. it's also an attempt to deplete campaign funds or funds that could go towards a campaign. it's trying to use a legal system in a political manner. the political border will important, right? which you know lot there. exactly. it's, and they've been doing this to him for years, and he's only been growing more popular. the democrats fundamentally do not understand why trump is popular with me. i'm not even a true guy. right. but i, i grass that the image of him against the establishment is what makes him popular. people like that he's the, is to be standing up to something that these the incorrect are correct. the c as fun to mentally corrupt it is like post conviction to speech. he said that we're living in a bunch of state and he is not for, you know, we're talking about a guy who built casinos in atlantic city skyscrapers in new york in the 19

seventy's, when most businesses involved the run, the mob. there's allegations that he was involved with them. it's more probable not, is it not that he just didn't pay off a points towards that keep quiet that, but i both are history but will not actually have any influence on peoples both going forward. donald trump was charged with $34.00 scouts separate out of defrauding the motor public. ostensibly, and i'm trying to say this in the, in the light most favorable to the prosecution. but i'm trying to say it'd be fair and if that makes any sense to you, congratulations, other than the jury, you're the only one that understands this. i don't understand. where does this leave the country on the global sense? because you've got washington, always trying to preach democracy, freedom of speech to others. they've got a case to answer to, is just making those more and more of

a laughing stock on the world stage as our genuine objective power we have the right. so we in the dollar in making sure other countries trading it is dwindling anyway. so just to sort of turn our, our justice system into part of this cloud show that is our general presidential elections every 4 years is just adding fuel to the buyer. and talking democracy now with almost a 1000000000 people eligible to vote on taking the election in india is no mean feat. but after 6 weeks, the world's largest democratic ex of 5 has the shak good flag in its sides polling stations close today. and the result was expected by tuesday. as many as 57 districts have been voting to, we liked more than 500 members of the lower house of parliament. the elections had been held in 7 stages. an old prediction suggesting coming from minnesota under

under moody will be handed to the tab on the final voting day, he urged old indians to play the part in what he called the great festival of democracy. the voting is going to take place today. and the last phase of the parliamentary elections are request all the voters of this phase to participate and through z asked equally in this great festival of democracy. i am confident that our youth and women voters will come forward in record numbers to cast their votes . let us together make our democracy more vibrant, lost on fine, no fees or forming the 7 fees are fully is being held today. i'm 7 states basically in the country are wanting to elect 57 lawmakers that will be sent to the house is to fall on this particular freeze is a very important one in this could very well decide in which on call st in

elections is really headed in that sense, this fees is very, very important to know. it's all number game here. now the roots are be gone, beheld for, for $543.00 fall. and once we see some of the magic number here will be 272. that's the top we mark. so 84, let it go far. see that's doctors 272 will form a government now use nobody's able to on its own. that's the $272.00 mark. what happens then use is that alliances come in phase. so it really will depend on which faulty is able to either on its own or read it. i live cross the 272, mark acosta. what's will be counted on full on june. and that's when you know what your needs going to happen to the top box. the lead by not going to movie is confident of we need to be off every 4 fall among the seats in the country. so an

old one will mean majority is what the heart huge on top. aki has been saying, in fact, one of the campaign slogan, design has been, is thoughts are so far, which is n t h on stage 2, that we would cross more than full hundreds the so a bigger majority than what it's called in 2014 and then in 2019, but he's got to is that what will happen? and that's something of course we'd have to wait and watch, but the india aligns sure has been a lot of position in india to d. i still, the forwarding is done so around 6 pm local time, there will be exit full. that will be the bed that we have to look out for. and this is what the local channels usually do. they do tie ops and we do examples the f one else and get them wrong, but won't be we'll have to see is a boiler foods which means um you, you collect all the exit polls and see which way the trend is moving. so we, and this ends to what the evening have an idea as to what really we can expect. on

the 4th of june, the georgia prime minister has slammed the o. s. c. or actually a couple kids they said, but the organizations critique of his nation's law of transparency has no legal ground to say that the law is getting go incompatible with human rights standards. in this case, the document by the always see office for democratic institutions and human rights isn't based on any legal argument and almost repeats the conclusion by the venice commission. the same transparencies that at the same time, we know that transparency is one of the most important european values and cannot be bad. therefore, a document st. transparencies bad can have any legal value to us spot. georgia has been engulfed in mass protest since march this year,

but that one straight has had been out raised by controversial forward agents bill, which was passed by the government earlier this week. foreign ministers from such countries as between. yeah, lots of. yeah. nice don't. yeah. all to want in the raleigh's i. let's take a closer look at the bill, which has got people so riled up at g o's, an independent media which receive more than 20 percent of their funding from abroad need to register and have to display a foreign agents label. of the bill was initially introduced back in 2023 by the ruling georgia dream party. last month, the president veto the bill for that move was then overturned by a majority in the government. the parliament speaker claims that the country has been torn into over the last 2 months, the position of the radical opposition and their n g o. allies has demonstrated that there are, on one hand, the interests of the george and people who are represented by the georgia dream

party. and on the other hand, the opposition and their n g o allies acting in the interest of foreign countries. now for more on this less trust live to speak with the georgia and the onto pena and political analysts. my, i'm my son rides. my am is good to have you join me right now. now the georgia and pon minister has taken a my, the o. s. c, review of the nations transparency law, which said that the bill is incompatible with human rights standards. what are your thoughts if the conclusion by the or c is fair or off base? hello, thank you for inviting me today. i think that it's 1st time in a modern history that we hear that the, the, the fact that people wanted to know more about the findings in the country and the fact that they want more transparency is somehow against the democracy itself. and

also human rights. because as far as we know in democratic countries, english, all the information must be visible for people. so it's one of their main rights that see democracy brings them. and i don't understand how is it against human rights at this point. so i think that as far as so they need this mode to be withdrawn and it doesn't matter what they say or how they will reach each other or mean full for union is to somehow make our problem and our goal is low. now though, as the staff of the us foreign agents registration acts can not be compared with the one adopted in georgia, why can't that be compared? how are there really different or the 1st of all, of course they are different because usa has different kind of environment. but it

has to deal with. and georgia has different kind of environment that has to deal with solos that are modify jason and usa or in georgia or should be different because they have to deal with different kind of realities. and we have the right to people that feeds us way more for example. so i think that's a piece kind of changes for necessarily when you're taking the low in your function because it should be peach. uh for your new subsidies. and i do see the differences between american law and georgia and well, because i'm always way more strict than georgia and one and number of all advice to unless it's just me people is i was in jewels and in georgia. it only applies to me in geo, so they are different. i don't know is way less strict sense in usa and it is different because our reality is different. so i think that's very political. yeah, it's good. you're able to break it down and you hope you have pointed out that the,

the law in united states, as far as this is concerned, is evelyn strict on the wanting georgia. so what is the justification to have the one in the united states and not have the one in, in georgia? so the difference is that for example, in usaid law applies to people as well as angels also they don't have to line, for example, some kind of find out how much money you would need to receiving order for you to give the information to a government in georgia, it's $0.20 so. so we have very high, i think the line for me to do it say doesn't have for this type of slice. this takes fine also, and they have the strength of the answers to those who don't go by the law in georgia. and they only get to find a don't get in jail, or do you use a legal scale if you are done?

so that's correct or so for the introduced law and i think that's the kind of the argument is actually not to fulfill. because uh, not just your friend at the slowest person to initiate, initiate or so told a position that they could actually company pay slowly. they would be okay with it from suicide, but they were against that anyway. so i think that to any kind of argument they bring, the initiators were ready to negotiate about it, but they just don't want to be slow to exist in georgia because their funds are not use in a way that it shouldn't be used. so they just don't want this information to be visible from beginning to end. it doesn't matter what it takes in order for them to cheapest. cool. all right, now, the speaker of the georgia in parliament has the keys, the west of inciting, the protest involved as in georgia. while we have no way and tell them that specifically. but can you share your thoughts if that is or is not the case?

oh, could you please repeat the question? i can understand that 1st part. yes question. well, i was saying that the reports credit to this peak of the georgia in parliament that the west was inciting bouldin's in georgia. now, as it is right now, we don't have concrete evidence to that as a, as it is right now. yet. but what are your thoughts whether this could likely be or not? who yes, because uh, as far as the know, uh, especially with the angels work, uh they are very political and they don't use pharmacy. no, just, for example, change the democratic, the situation or work on economy or actual problems that georgia has. so basically what we've seen is that they are getting funds and then they are initiating some kind of political activities or order in order to achieve some type of.