[000:00:00;00] the, [000:00:00;00] the, [000:00:00;00] the hello and welcome to cross topic were all things are considered. non peter live out . we're told us president joe buying does not want the stand off with russia over ukraine to trigger a global war. the evidence suggests just the opposite. nature now uses ukraine to attack russia,

have no doubts. russia will respond. a cross talking nato. i'm joined by my guest, dimitri lot scholars in athens. he's a lawyer and a freelance journalist involved we have carlos out. he is a political analyst historian and host of the silk and steel pod cast and invasion . we cross blue she, when she is a international affairs commentator, as well as a cvt and radio reporter. alright. costs are pros and effect. that means you can jump any time you want, and i always appreciate carl, let me go to you 1st and bali a far from the fray and ukraine here. i mean, it's really quite remarkable. we have this new phrase now adapt in a just that's what nato is doing right now when it comes to arming ukraine, except for now. oh, you can use nato equipment tissue just a little bit into russians territory, which of course we've been doing for over a year now. but now that's part of their adapt and adjusted me. this is the path to war and it's a nato war against russia. they can no longer say they're not part of the conflict

. they've been part of the conflict from day one. is there a matter of fact, they started this complet, go ahead carl. it was this that nato is losing its proxy war against russia. right now is our scrambling, trying to do whatever they can try to salvage the situation. um, so is there a certain did not have to be more upfront in about 3 involvement. but, you know, politicians in washington have been very explicit. we say this is a war, this is a proxy. words are fighting russians using the ukranian, they're fighting russia to the last ukrainians. this has always been their policy. while it's very interesting, let's go to our guest in beijing. we keep hearing about ukraine has the right to self defense. well, it's a solver and country, of course it has the right to self defense, but nato's approach to this conflict. this proxy war is karl's pointed out. here, russia is not allowed to have the idea of self defense,

so you have american weapons in ukraine going into russia. it's killing civilians because it's a primarily what they've done so far. and russia is war not to react with. this is not how it works. russia will obviously react, and it is all russia's already warned the west that it will go ahead and basically are right here actually as press them to a team. so the presence way is the nato, and the also or us let's nato and eases is a restriction for ukraine to use lessons weapons there. there won't be serious consequence on that. and actually we know that, so just a, as you mentioned, that the beginning that lincoln said that the us position was the hallmark of the by them. and the stations stands on ukraine to adapt and adjust as needed. so we

can see that the u. s. policy is foreign policy has been changing time overtime and it overs contradicts itself. and it's also more interesting. is that person by then i said he will not attend. the upcoming summit is, was a lens despise the lensky is urging by them to go. but instead of the biden is sending his vice president her us to be the or so i think this is some kind of ironic to see that the us approves you, chris, but ukraine's you solve on the west and supplied weapons. russia, which was indeed to escalate the conflict in the region. and so, so i'm highly doubtful about the upcoming re, uh, results of the peaceful. yeah, i want to talk about that in the 2nd part of the program. dimitry. i mean, again, you know, i adapt in a chest. i mean, this is a farce. i mean,

the goal is always been nothing to do with ukraine. it's about to inflict a strict defeat on russia. this has been the policy from the get go now saying, allowing the ukrainians to use these weapons to shoot missiles and drones into russia. it's some ne toe forces that are the command and control of those missiles and drones. these are americans and europeans making the targeting ordinance and everything else related to firing these arms. i mean, this is absolutely a farce. and of course zalinski, his name is already been mentioned here. he wants this, he wants nato to go to war, to over for his country. and this is something that the united states and nato seemed to be quite willing to go and proceed. go ahead, dimitri, as well, the targeting, which is clearly coming from american military personnel because you're trained, doesn't have the capacity to do that. the manufacturer of the web switch is clearly

coming from the united states and united states doesn't even deny that is only part of the story. in addition, you have us military personnel. they may not be formally designated as active members of the military, although some of them are, if they've been trained by the us military and other western powers, fighting alongside the premiums on the front line. you have the training. again, this is not being denied tens of thousands of ukrainian soldiers trained to native standards, whatever that means by the admission of western governments. you have that those a, an economic work that was being wasted on re, i'm sure. again, the western powers would not denine this, and we're openly bragging about the economic warfare the wage. and there's been a disaster in every conceivable respect. this has been a work by any to against russia. and that has been cleared from the outset. and this whole non sense that uh, this is simply a ukrainian war with the support of nato. it's something that we ought to have seen

3 months ago. this phrase, by the way, adapt and the just, it's a relative phrase. it begs the question of, what are they adapting and adjusting to yep. what they ducting and adjusting to is a crushing loss on the training battlefield. so they're responding bite to this crushing loss which they've now realized. they cannot avoid by taking the fight or trying to in deep into the territory of russia with the for rent this consequences that potentially entails. so people need to wake up and listen to the french anthropologist emmanuel todd who offered a book recently which said, which was titled, world war 3 has begun. it has folks, yes i, i've been a program on that dimitry. we are in the, in world war 3 right now and we, we, could you actually talk maybe another program about how the different blocks are lining up. i agree with that completely. you know, car of the, there's, there's whole a adapt in adjust. i mean, is giving the, the green light then this has all the public relations been here for ukraine to do that. of course. so it's nato that is going to be doing that in ukraine and outside

of ukraine, quite possibly. but that doesn't change the conditions of the battlefield in ukraine. you can take out a refinery in russia, but it's not going to change the course of the conflict and ukraine. again, this has nothing to do with ukraine. what it has to do is, is to push russia into a much more aggressive posture. that's what they want. and they'll say, see that guy started it. that's exactly what they're trying to do, carl. and that's exactly what they're trying to do. and whatever they do, you know, strike is deeper into rush, or that's not going to have any material of effect on the outcome of the work in ukraine. because right now russia is having the upper hand of the battlefields. no matter what, whatever this i just adjustment nato is making, is not making

a difference. all you does is to makes the russian public to rally more solidly behind, present food. and it's special, a military operation, ukraine. so i don't, right, it's, it's written, this is really a lot, very desperate. last ditch effort or by the nato alliance to salvage. it's, uh, it's, it's, it's, it's a face saving operation now. well, i mean carl, i mean i, i use the metaphor, a face saving, but essentially what they're going to get is a go on their face, which really bothers me here. let's go back to our guest in beijing because the more nato loses and the more at deploys and losing strategy. the more aggressive the nato alliance is going to be come because they do, they do not want to lose faith. they are the ones that are saying, if we lose in ukraine, russian tanks, we're all in to paris or to the, to the english channel, which is absolutely absurd. even american and british intelligence have agreed with that. but that's not the public relations when the problem here is that we're

having to contend with a public relations campaign from the west and not about realities on the ground. go ahead and basing you're right, peter. actually, if you look at the day he talked about over 99 percent of those supplies of whether the military supply initial supply were from in many tarion, 8 to ukraine, came from nato and the us. so if they're not hearing those weapons to ukraine, this conflicts could have, i mean, see a result and at least have a back to the negotiation table earlier than what we're seeing today. and you're right, we are seeing that the mainstream media in the glass to have being not very so i'll say balanced when it comes to is reports on the rush or you create conflict. and i just,

i think that's why it's important for us to have this conversation now and to talk about like we, we don't when we don't, we no longer need, you know, like the east restrictions on the west and made that post to you print and what's more interesting is that you have um, if you could recall that for many times we hear us officials are saying a washington well finds onto the last of the ukrainian it's right. so that's very yeah, that's for around x. because as they are notified to you on till the last of america or the last off, the you for appeals, they're fighting on to the last of the well entry. and so, and plus, you know, they're making a lot of money in the process. okay. that they profit motive is in play here. you know, dmitri, they keep saying they want to, you know, by adapting and adjusting to improve ukraine's position at the negotiating table. well, number one, there is no negotiating table. no one is invited, rush into it, and the longer they do this, the smaller ukraine get. so what is improving their position?

go ahead, dmitri or, well, the so called any, any so called peace conference that doesn't include your adversary is not a conference, a piece of the conference of war. what they're trying to do, obviously, for those of us who are saying and the check to is marshall more support to put pressure on the rush, it to capitulate. and the terms that zalinski has articulated from the outset are precisely that there are complete and utter capitulation. which takes no account of legitimate grievances of russia. it takes no account of the crew in 2014. it takes no account of the human rights abuses of the russian speakers in the dawn bass. it takes no account of the assurances that were given at border shots that neither would not expand one inch eastward. it gives no account to russia's legitimate concerns about nato nuclear tipped missiles, just a few 100 miles from moscow on ukrainian territory. this is a demand for capitulation demand and capitulation. and that's why so many major countries are not going to participate here. we're just going to jump in here.

we're going to go to a hard break, and after that hard break, we'll continue our discussion on nato state without the, the,

the, the car acceptance. and i'm here to plan with you whatever you do, do not watch my new shelves. seriously. why watch something that's so different whitelisted opinions that he won't get anywhere else. welcome to please or do you have the state department to see i a weapons bankers, multi 1000000000 dollar corporations. choose your fax for you. go ahead. i changed and whatever you do, don't want my shell stay main street because i'm probably going to make you uncomfortable. my show is called stretching time. so i guess you probably don't wanna watch it because it might just change the way you say. welcome back. across stock where all things are considered. i'm curious about your mind. you were discussing nato, the ok. let's go back to carl and volley. you know,

we've already mentioned this ridiculous a peace conference, so called peace conference that will be held this month from the 15th. they think that in switzerland it's with the oddity of it all is that we have a, a piece proposal from the chinese. we have one from africa. i think the, even the pope's, even the prophecy weighed in there's, there's a lot of piece plans out there. if you look at the, the, the demands that the russian sent out in december of 2021 to nato, into the united states about, um, securing a new security architecture in europe. those that is actually part of the process. but they're all ignored. that's a long introduction, carl, the saying, the west has no idea about how to bring peace. all they do is know how to keep the war going on. that's. that's obviously true from their policies over 2 years. go ahead. that has been in the west has so much hubris that he did. it denies the rush,

they even have legitimate security interest president put and has made it very clear call back in 2000 no 7 unix security conference or the word of the west that they could no longer make a mockery of russian security interest and re neck on their promises for ever. and now we have witnessed what happened. well, but what, what we're witnessing right now is the, the, the nato establishment itself is inc, still in denial, in our total failure to degrade russia's capability on the, on the battlefield. the, the ukrainian manpower is being depleted. russia has the issue. russia has the upper hand and this is why they have to act. they have to, there's a natal forces have to be more upfront about 30 involvement because then ukrainians are not holding up the. ready uh, holding up their, their line against russian offensive right now. well, you know, it is, um, when in,

in beijing the, the chinese proposal is probably the most balanced of them all. okay. it, it, it, it talks about in terms of how to get to an end game. every country should have secure borders. there are so sovereignty should be respected. those are the details, but that's a good way to start. that's how you start the negotiation process. and what we have with this zelinski piece plan, so called, which was probably drafted in london or in a, in washington d. c is basically say russia, you must admit defeat. okay. you, you should a surrender to, to, to the 1st ukrainian tank. you say, i mean that's not how it works. it's, this is like, there's no imagination and when it comes to diplomacy in the west anymore, of your rights, peter actually, you know, at the past us or atlanta, um, the uh,

the assignments in singapore. so lensky, he was so choosing, trying out for not taking his sides, actually, i'm trying to, there's no such a thing as trying to is pressuring other nations now to attend the p summit in special lands, nor is helping russia to disrupt the summit. in fact, as you mentioned that china is position on the russia, ukraine conflict has been very consistent and it does not target any specific party . and searchlight does know the post assignments. in fact, as the motions turn to us position on those, i would say a counselor to remain the house of 2 or 3 important elements in china as perspective that a successful piece. um, it should have the 1st as that recommendation of a from both russia and ukraine. the 2nd does that equal participation of both parties. and the last is that

a fair discussion all possible peaceful tense. however, if we look at the situation now, obviously the upcoming summit in space of land has not met these 3 importance criterias on 1st. the summit was not recognized by russia. the 2nd on this time it did not invite russia. and 3rd, one of the most important players in this conflict was not invited to the table. how can we guarantee the are going to be an open dialogue to ensure a possible peaceful, you know, up to them coming all the help this i met? so i think that's the 6 the most important reason why china is now participating because china believes that so a peaceful conference, i mean the carmen's, the upcoming peace conference, individual loans kind of sharply plague a substance type role to resolve the issue. me over, i think it's important to point out that so not participating into the assignment does not mean china does not support piece and for search and they shows or

participate into the assignment. does not mean they are genuinely supporting piece . because, i mean, trying to just does not want to see that the upcoming summit become a platform to support, you know, confrontation among cans or, you know, all it's going to be is a p r son for nato, that, that's it. and, and their academy, and they're going to have their, i list her out as a lensky who's legitimacy is quite dubious at this point in time and violating the, the constitution of ukraine. you know, dimitri, what i worry about, and i've worried about since the 1st day of this conflict and i, i, i know i set it on this program. eventually we will get to an article 5 crisis. i believe that now more than ever your thoughts. yes, i think we are typically heading that direction because rush will be less than all the alternative that's already so there that it's going to have to strike military

assets in western in, in central or western europe. i think that's quite clear. for example. ready there's a large staging area in poland from which a number of these weapons a lot of training, a lot of intelligence is gathered. this is under international law. clearly a legitimate target in russia has refrain from striking it for months. but it's very clear that it will have no alternative, but they keep attacking military targets deeper and deeper into rush into click. the key question, of course, is going to be, as russia has said explicitly, how will the united states respond when russia inevitably attacks more of these european, legitimate military targets? if the people of the united states have their way, the united states will stay out of it. but the problem, but the problem here and those of us who live, you know, have a front row view of what goes on united states is i do because i spend a lot of time in canada is that the united states political lead doesn't care what the people want, it couldn't care less about the interest of americans as the americans had their

way. uh, there would be a lot less military spending, and these wars of aggression would never have happened. so this is the real danger is that the us politically will respond to the article 5 call from europe that will inevitably come despite the demands of the populace to refrain from world war 3 in its hottest phase. we're already in a low intensity world where 3 as we talked about peter, but we're heading to the heart is night. i suspect we're going to end up in a full blown conflagration and i hope very much that i'm wrong. well, i hope you're wrong, and i hope i'm wrong. but it, carl, there's a certain logic of this. what are the, the biggest problems that we have faced in this conflict? is the idea of deterrence has been so degraded by the west. see if, if you want to have the idea of a mutual assured destruction deterrence, both parties have to believe in that theory. that's how we got through the cold war . but we have one party now that is throwing that to the side,

rushes saying we will have to deter this type of assault on those. but the west doesn't speak in that him anymore. and that's why everything is becoming extremely unstable. because if you have long range missiles or f sixteens, okay, and they leave a, a base in poland and they're on a mission. russia is not going to know if they have nuclear taped missile or not. you don't take those kinds of chances. what you do is say, if we say a plane like that, it's going to be destroyed and they're going to say it upfront. and then you know what they're going to say carl. the russians are bluffing. russians don't bluff, they act carl. so western politicians are playing a very dangerous game of chickens right now, and i very much hope dimitry is wrong, even though i very much respect his analysis. you know, during the cold war, nixon have pioneered the so called madness theory, where east to west acts likes

a complete cycle. the other side will back down this, this was work we still get union by today's russia is quite different. political entity fung soviet union of yesteryear, mr. putting has shown that he will not risk. he will not spend dial from the rightful nato. and so we're going to see we're going to see user a. nato will be called always on bluff or will have room were stories for the sake of everyone. here i hope demetrius wrong. there. the hope of that those the natal bloss will be caught and they will back down. and i think i alternately, people work in the military industrial complex in, in washington they, they're out of it, game is to lining their own pocket. so well, i mean, what i think call you're on to something we would say what like, life is threats. they need a threat, inflation they, but if you go to the wall,

then you lose your business model. okay. i mean that, that's kind of, you know, that's kind of the logic of it all here. when in, in, in beijing, i suppose china is watching all of this very, very closely. because the, the, what the americans would like is a nato in, in asia, in the pacific. and we know what targets they have. it is tie one here. so i hope that the, the folks in beijing are learning from the dirty tricks from the west. you know, you're right with, you know, many times people will compare like the case happened, the crane with taiwan. but the thing is, taiwan is totally different because it's now the country is not like ukraine type was part of china. and so that's been great by most of the countries in the world. and also by the us. us of greece was the one china principal. but there is, but without i, i agree with you dear, but they don't act that way. they don't act is a big part of the same kind of just typical us foreign policy is there's one thing

. but as another setting turn is fully throughout that and trying to, well, i mean the remaining is consistent foreign policy on ty one. and so i think the world agree was even the un like in the past, the world health or event, the un recognize china is the only legal country in the u. n. so i think that the, the global and community support stats. yeah. but you know, and unfortunately we've seen the united states and its relationship with china throwaway, just about every important bilateral agreement going from the, the point of breaking diplomatic relations. and so we see a templates in europe, and we see a template in asia. and what it's called is the rules based order. and when you hear the rules base order, you should be afraid as all the time we have. i want to take my guess in athens while we and of course in beijing,

and i want to thank our viewers for watching us here, are tc and next time. and remember across stop the . the water is a part of the blog post that isn't the deepest you of us, and that in the word part, is it something deeper, more complex might be present. let's stop without. felicia is that spelled out of

in the late 18 ninety's french soldiers led by general pole boot. i arrived in asia with the goal of expanding french control in west africa to the territory of more than shot no one or 3 to come on sunday. i mean, you stuck up some issues around the cars, do, and dick's showing the list to the tent, overlay on least one of the most horrific campaigns of a trustees to have ever taken place in the history of the continent. liability getting hold of somebody. i know the question that you download the glass. you followed there to do some people professional, most likely multiple villages with devastated a numerous members of resistance groups with the headed apartment for us to get the move of nancy. and i'm going to be a young investigator in search of his own identity and box on that you need to africa. the choices general good eyes, flood drenched roots in an effort to establish how your legacy still echoes

throughout the confidence. so my name is sam and i come from england and i've come really to find out more about the emissions of willie and the history of colonialism in in the region. the, the hello again, everybody. i'm rick sanchez. this is direct impact. and this is what we're going to be talking about today. i'm on a little more here today as to where we are, what might be possible. but i need your help. everyone wants peace. now. let's raise their voices, the president bible sounding like a man. he doesn't watch the news tells the world, but it must ask for peace. hall, where's events? then he announces that he is real, have reached a peace deal. did he really though?

see, this gets weird and i'm going to take you through it. i'm rick sanchez, get ready for a direct impact the so here's what happens. uh, that even shocked me to a certain extent yesterday. so president biden comes out right, the steps up to the microphone and he announces this historic piece deal. and i'm thinking, oh my god, this is important, right? he's got a new piece deal that he's announcing, and he says, israel has agreed to it. he kind of stumbles his way through it. you know, as he often does. but in the book that i'm thinking you got to give this guy credit . this is a powerful message, israel as now offering israel as of