2017. the ceo of texas by his company at 4 make told voice of america, but it was continuing deliveries of lethal weapons to craig. it very close cooperation with the us state department dependents are going on. do you quite need government? but the amendment explicit being recognized as of, as i'm putting the new a nazi, i'm fascist. so it seems that was neo nazis. i know a bunch of a all through lots according to the united states, nor is leading. i like germany to send them back to you, cried. perhaps the i see it front of us or your date a should in facts down as a reminder, the russia for the nazis. then he's doing the same against the idea of logical successes today. how many, thanks for your company, this. the sound of out with monique, is in about 13 minutes. i hope to see you again the, the,

the, for the find. another one does for you about the latest events in the ukraine city . secretary general of nato mystery solved sumburgh suggested that to be that you can be given an opportunity to introduce trade and the russian army k territory using the weapons procured from the inquiry by you from your bill. you saw me do a pin countries if wade was, is now including the united states and not all of them. um, but uh the united states are also close to still some countries that housing discussions about sending smelled you instructors and counselors here that i'd like to ask you to comment on these 2 decisions on what it will be, especially response to that. thank you. is disc disease from the house sellers and

instructors and their presence there. there is nothing new new they are already present this on the ukrainian territory. unfortunately for them they're incurring losses. i know that for sure. and they're not being targeted specifically, but it just happens to use, but the european countries in the united states prefer to keep that silent for a little here. and secondly, that's for high precision, long range weapons you. i think we need to break this topic down into 2 dealer 1st, the conventional arms multiple launch rockets, systems of 70 kilometer range or so most likely have been used for a very long time. indeed, the training and service mentioned do that on their own. now, as for high tech, modern, high precision, precision guided the long range weapons, such as the storm shadow of u. k. were attack comes over us. it was over the french missiles as well in the bears repeating. since i've said it before, when i travel to the central asian country, and so the attack them through 300 kilometer range of how they use suits and how

are they transfer me as well. so they've transferred the missile system. here it was given by the pentagon, inside the us, how is it used as to pursue premium service? main cannot independently conduct the striking with dismissal, understands their technologically incapable of doing this. you know, for that they require satellite reconnaissance, intelligence. i'm showing based on that intelligence data. this is us the satellite intelligence they need to put in the flight traveler from the flight mission of the missile. and later put it into the missile system in the service and standing there was a message, it looks like he's doing that simply automatic his phone number. he's just pushing the button was to he might not even know what happens next. the speaking, what could be the participation of you creating a service man, and he's not those who are typing, the buttons are higher than that. they can choose the target and they can say, what's the priority target for them and becomes what they do not decide whether to strike this target or not. because yet again, the flight mission of the missile is basically typed in only by those we're providing the weapons if it's attack comes and if it gets done by the pentagon,

you, so the storm shadow that somebody u. k. is even simpler sometimes because the flight mission is typed in automatically without the service man on the ground. it's done automatically by the u. k. then i, that's it. because i, when the bonus were, officers were thinking whether it's right the crime in bridge or any other facilities. well, they were thinking for themselves, right? but it wasn't done for that issue. so that's what they were going to do in the same applies to the french specialist. we know what is done by the western specialist. therefore, we foster no allusion about that. usually the 1st of, well, how are we to respond when most of the naturally will improve our anti missile defense systems? air defense systems will destroy these incoming missiles. see my teachers to 2nd. we're thinking that if someone believes it possible to provide such weapons the military to the war zone and in order to conduct strikes against our territory, we think 3 issues for us. then why don't we have an opportunity to provide the same class of weapons to those regions of the world where the strikes will be conducted

agent sensitive facilities of those countries who are doing that against russia. and therefore, the response might be a symmetrical. and we will think about that you put a key to number 3, such actions. well, we've deteriorated, live, change the situation for the worse, and they will continue to deteriorate the international situation and undermine international security. in the end, can we see that such countries are engaged in the war against the russian federation? and that is a direct participation in the war against the russian federation teaches. we leave ourselves the right to respond the same way. it's a path towards very serious issue. this will be done so much as the president given us a good action was both. uh, president trump and the president. by doing, can you give us a quote you to a perspective and you view which one do you think would be the most favorable candidate for a, you know, to us, and the russian relations,

given the ongoing war or that is going on. and you can now here's a new i've already spoken about that and everyone perceive my statement about president biden with a smirk sort of speaks. and that they saw some kind of hidden critique of president by, well, indeed, he's an old school politician. and the fact that he didn't like it into a certain extent, he started to attack me, but well, i knew that what happens is that means that i was right. and he is predictable to that. only confirms our notions about what i've talked about. but in general, we don't really care because president trump ex president trump, who's accused of being a spy for russia. we know that's just pure nonsense, just garbage. just an element of domestic, political infighting, between democrats and republicans, and baseless ridiculous accusations against trump sort of move. well, we have always perceived that as an element of domestic vickery and in for, in the united states that was later confirmed during the national investigation in the us. and there were no connections with president trump is never exist. however,

what remains of factors that fee during his presidency started to introduce massive sanctions against the russian federation with steve left, the intermediate near to their forces treating that was that happened during his the president. so, and i'm speaking very sincerely now that we believe we thinking that some scene will change in the us policy regarding russia to, to say, we don't think that anything will change because no serious changes will take place some time when, when you go to what's happening in the united states, or you know, what fully, well, what happens during the political inside when they're burning themselves from the inside and make sure their political system, their state on this. and i have to say it is whether it's pleasant or not. and there are legend leadership in democracy. they're also bringing to the ground because it is apparent to the rest of the world that the prosecution of trust, especially in court. and the allegations that happened due to events that happened years ago without direct approved. well,

this is purely use in the corporate system for political purposes you, it's apparent to us here in russia, but again, i'm sure that can be seen in the u. k as well. and then the rest of the world can see that as well. and most importantly, these think that of the united states as well, because after a well known decision of the court was a jury gave a guilty verdict to prove, well, this is purely using the court system for political purposes. we all know that the rating and the ranking of president trump grew by 6 percent right away, i think, and donations to his election campaign also increased because it's what does it tell us? it tells us that the people in the us do not believe the court system, the justice system of the united states when it makes such decisions. and believes that they're politically motivated. maybe it's counterintuitive. you put in for policies in domestic policy and an economic policy as well. and then i think that today's administration or conducting one mistake after another and you sometimes i get surprised at what's happening and therefore we're watching it from the side.

we've never interfered. and the domestic politics of the united states, and we do not intend to do it, but we'll see what will happen, what it will lead to. but you just like to wrap up my answer with what i began with the end result. and as we believe he does not have a great significance, we'll work with any president elected by the us people to should the, you don't think anything would change in terms of the support for you create for the clinton or if tom comes. but you don't think there'd be a change to this because it's hard to say, i don't think i can make it clear cut the conclusion whether something will change or not. i think we'll need to take a look at the priority of the future administration to if that's the future and ministration is or will follow the national interest. and if they think that the national interest will be to stabilize the situation within the country, not to bet on immigration to consolidate a society within the united state of stuart to amend the mistakes that lead to tremendous stature for innovation within the us. to then that truly following the

domestic national interest, if they would follow them, then it would pursue the goals of global liberals and say that i think is destroying the united states from the inside. but it's very well they strive to be the leader of global liberally, some of them. well, no. but if they follow the national interest, then maybe there could be some changes in the foreign policy towards russia and towards the conflict in ukraine. but remember how many? yes, i mentioned to, but in that case some changes are possible, but i think you would agree with me that no one is interested in the united states and ukraine. they're interested in the magnificence of supremacy and leadership of the united states in the world with it. and they don't want to allow in any kind of success by russia or least indeed with this. they believe that in that case, that will be detrimental to the us leadership. that's the whole point of what the us is doing, right. but a future administration changes the priorities for itself. they would set that goal is differently to use and they would see that the essence of their work in strength

and in the united states, from the inside with finance, economy, ship building, normal relations in the world, more respectful towards everyone and something may change. sure. i think that it depends on the sentiment in the society, and i think that the sentiment is shifting to that in to the board. and i think that is the future administration. so we'll catch that wind and their sales. then the change as possible for the push to go forward with an e book. so, i mean, you should 35 you, they were free flags behind you, the back of russia, but also the soviet union, the end of the russian empire. so that was the beauty certified progression and tires and tell us one does it way someone suspects that we have some imperial ambitions. please imagine this will bring back the soviet union and we'll have it from bailey and islamic populations that ever come into your mind. you shouldn't invent anything that's not there. we're not against an increase in these lama population. the rather happy that it happens in the russian federation. now me some of our per dominantly islamic republic. so we have

a very good birth rate us and we are very happy about the woods past is because the page has been turned now we're looking into the future. so based on the reality of today, the flags that you see right now are part of our history and sydney and we should not invent anything we lose these contemplation so. so to shape your opinion about russia, those are your only harming yourself with that. imagine that russia wants to attack nato. what are you done? let's know who invented that? this is garbage nonsense and nothing else. it would have been just pure garbage if they didn't try to do their population, then they should cry. will then say that russia is trying to attack us and we need to arm ourselves and send all of our weapons to ukraine. but why is it being done to maintain their own imperial domination and greatness? hence, the threats and the scary stories are for the mores. why in germany and other parts of europe. there was no such threat and it could never be. we're defending ourselves, a new frame might be aware of the united states over the ocean. and we're here right now, it's

a move of imagine we would do that in canada right now. what the us is doing that, our threshold right here in the ukraine or in mexico. and i see where we can see right now that the united states now, well, back in the day, they took part of the mexican territory. and right now they can fight for the return of their territory to it. so that's what the western countries are trying to do in terms of the russian ukrainian crisis. or we have you ever considered that you shouldn't look at the flags you have. you should look into the crux of the matter for we have no imperial ambition. believe me, this is nonsense, we'll just like this threat of russia to nato and european countries and potential of natal machine and the russian potential. what do you decide that we're crazy about to do? now as far as the provision of web injury is concerned, such supplies to conflict so well, that is always a bad thing, especially because those who supply weapons use are not simply supplying the weapons, are also managing the weapons and control in the good. and that is very dangerous, and a very serious step. we know that in germany does not deny that. i don't know how

it got into the media, but you, you know, the generals of the beams as well were discussing how and when they were distributed crimean bridge or other facilities on the russian territory on which, including the territories which no one doubts belongs to russian to see it, when the 1st german tanks appeared on the training soil with german produce tanks, it caused a moral and ethical shock in russia because our relations with germany had always been very good to do. but i see right now, you know, this talk that some missiles are going to appear that will strike the russian territories, then this will fully undermine the russian german relations. we understand as a famous, the german political leader said after the 2nd world war and the germany has never been fully independent doors in the precise sense of the word, the following sovereign states. or what i see, we were in contact with chancellor shortly so that we had multiple meetings were not given the assessment to the performance of the german government to accept to the germans voters,

to pass judgment on that. get back to soon the european parliament elections are coming in and we'll see how it goes. you know, i still have many good friends in germany months. i'm trying not, you know, to compromise them so that they don't have any problems. i try not to maintain relations right now with them, but i've known them for many years and i've known that they're reliable friends with it. and i've gotten many of those in germany and i know the landscape and how things go in the political landscape is the cd use around 30 percent? 16 percent is the social democrats, s p d 15 percent alternative for germany, a f d and the rest. and this is how the voters are respond to it. this shows the sentiments among german citizens who said, i mean, i understand germany's independence, the defense and security in general. yeah. i'm cognizant of their dependence on information policy because, you know, whatever big media outlet you'll look at, you'll see that the end beneficiary is some kind of american foundation. just going to be and you know, while i apply those american foundation, say so they're doing

a great job because they have a type driven on media landscape in germany. it's lying low, all the while. it's very hard to stand up to that. i understand some, however, some very simple things in those thing as well as even strange with no one today and the german leadership is defending the german interest between yes, germany does not have the full sovereignty, but there are journeys and you need to think about their interest, but you might look at it so they blew up those poor pipelines in the baltic sea. no one is even an eviction is about the amount as if it's the right thing to do was i'm on my, not someone's directing or indeed where and told me in the morning and we'll sit down to evaluate for any maintenance trash, the status or the president and number of people expressed ministration and you need a letter mention is a way the way on the test out in the relations during the time of the president price will have to do that is one of the great services of our president. and i'll be also pointed out the role played by president for icbc now and then just

bilateral relations and the regional relations. and the question that i wanted to ask you this time, you said that it would be continued on the development of relations with the ryan. what kind of program is plan? do you see where there's some agreements achieved with pressing pricey? what is that mount? pleasant for the past, yvonne and russia in the future. one of the developing relations between russia and the rod in the study fashion, making good headway across many avenue from both russia in iran happened to be under sanctions, different sanctions regime. and he was surprised when we learned recently some of the levels of technological achievement senior ron told me, we were surprised. however, our ronnie and friends had managed to preserve such a high level of production, industrial production in certain technologies, despite the sanctions, hasn't been for us for many years. so we were pleasantly surprised. our trade and economic ties are developing some we've gotten many joint projects. we would like to take additional efforts aimed at developing high tech and certainly taking into account the restrictions use. this is going to be difficult,

but still it can be done. and this is something we're going to do. so now as for present, right, i see who is killed in this tragedy. i would like to say that we had very good notion reliable business like relations with having to use a very interesting person who was a series politician, see a reliable partner. and so he possessed a great sense of irony and humor things, and it was very interesting person to talk to know want to communicate with not just interesting, but also useful jim stickers. and i would like to say that if we achieve degrees in with him on something, then one could be a 100 percent. sure. if this issue would not be lost sight of illness. but that doesn't mean that all issues have been resolved because it's not just up to the leaders that these issues depend on you what we were working together to improve and enhance our relations. as it was under president rice, then iran had joined bricks and the seal, which is testimony to the fact that we were moving together in the right direction . in particular, in the direction of setting up a multi polar world order in blue. and iran had continued to play

a significant role in that regard. there's one thing i would like to say concluding my answer to your question about the issue. i would like to say that we're hopeful that everything that has been achieved by president rice and russian. you, ronnie, and relations is going to be picked up and continue. and i have no doubts that this is exactly what's going to happens. this is because everything we're doing is showing me the mutual interest of a rush any wrong. we know that the iranian statehood is very stable, that the too many, we're aware how the executive and the power system in iran are working. i've listed in the we know that it's not just the president and his colleagues who work on form laws because you see the supreme leader is also playing a significant role in that regard station. and so we're waiting for the elections of the next president. the have to and i look forward to meeting the new president over on a different international events, including the shanghai cooperation organization and the brain was assigned to it. and i'm confident that we will find common ground. and we'll follow up on these

projects whose foundations were laid by the late president, vices, and millions of people around the world are opposing the attacks against the guys and people which is amount to the level of genocide right now. and then what's russia has a way for his intent to play a role in the solution of the situation right now having gaza and do you have any intention to also get the security council in motion? and because of the people, not only the guys and people about the posting and people in general and the people off the different origins, religion at the city, and in free from any identity and backgrounds, the people of the world are actually asking for the big powers to finish what is happening right now on the ground in the cousins. thank you very much. the for sure,

because it's, well, the 1st thing i want to say is that we're certainly against terrorism in all its forms and we're against attacks and the civilian population in any place in any countries. but what we're seeing today, and gosh, that in response to the well known terrorist attacks in israel does not look like a war. it looks like a total destruction of the civilian populations from goods. i can only reiterate russia's official position, easiest thing with the interest of the result of the united states policies with which moved away all the tools that had been a created for attempting to collect a solution to this problem. maybe some more of the us administration decided that if you have the option to do, but the process will be set up for the experience as showing michelle, this is not true, but it isn't in resolving this issue. so just providing material resources, it is also not a promising endeavor. remember, when we mentioned it's a solution to political questions such as the fate of the policy and people. and it's a store of them prospects can not be solved,

is by per writing some economic handouts. of course, it is a necessary component to, to create an environment where a solution can be found. but you must address the political question. and the main political question for revolves around the creation of the palestinian state of the 2 state solution was a mandated by the human decision to go so that the house command states to co exist with the jewish state. so without addressing the key issues result in the substance of this problem would not be positive, but then the russian position here is principal and it does not depend on the current situation with them. it has been standing since the soviet times. we know that president or the one is making energetic efforts to achieve a solution for us. it is a difficult problem, lives in considering his high authority in the region and in the world, in the as lama coiled. first of all, i think is making a significant contribution in russia and invited sparks is willing to do everything it can to help solve this less fee,

especially considering the relations that you've achieved with the state of israel over we some decade so. so to can replace a bus which, you know, the, what has been going on for 8 months, the prime minister that they all said to want stuff onto the, gets home us. yeah. you know, it's to that. so how do you see the scenario? how do you see a got this confused unfolding and given your diploma to a you know, the nations and cloud was device, you know sort of g was home us even with the is the, the, i don't know is it's a bit strange but we've done 5 countries do think of playing a leading role in it in uh, getting an end to the conflict based on the 2 state solution as of a difficult for us and really believes that that is hopefully the 1st thing in state. this is one and then i sort of nicholas, i think there is whole years in particular due to the fact that both in the us and in israel, there are people who advocate for a 2 state solution. you'll notice there are people there who believe that this is

precisely because it has pursued the says, namely to set up 2 sovereign states people. and there are people who believe that this path is going to lead us to piece the. this is what will allow finding the piece for me, let us ask for russia playing a leading role. i don't think we need to do that because there are many players who are involved in that conflict and who have a great deal of influence with the developments making a contribution to finding the solution is something we could do given the relationships of who we have fostered over the recent decades with israel and also given the relations we have traditionally had with these mom and the role comes with the arrow more uh these relations are based on trust. but i think that the main contribution was need to come from the countries of the region are and also the regional organizations such as the organization for as long as the cooperation with the arab league of the neighboring countries, such as the egypt, saudi arabia, the gulf, countries took here as one of the leading players and the islamic world,

and certainly the us to meet them. we are not holding onto some extreme issues issues according to which the us has to be excluded from the settlement. that's just impossible from the new and israel has to play a role as well because this is what the golden mean needs to be found. and i reiterate this can be done, given the sentiments in the american society is rarely society, given the sentiment in the error of the world is going on. as long as we're trying to do what we can providing in particular humanitarian assistance. as you're aware of, we played a certain role in securing the release of several hostages of russian origin. so should we continue to work in pursuing this avenue by working with our partners discussion your app. just saying that we've got good relations based on trust. and we've been fostering those relations for decades, but we need to work together rather than trying to monopolize a piece process that would be harmful to us because monopolizing could be a good thing. if the one doing the monopolizing structural mutual position moves

with the monopolize or is incapable of pursuing this neutral position sooner or later its sides with one of the sides in it all falls apart. resulting in the tragedies like the ones we are currently witnessing about the scenario. how do you see this conflict now door and goes on for the and one last question on the menu. so for sure, we have come up with a number of initiatives for you in security council calling for a cease fire like you, us is blocked. that is on the veto in those initiatives. here's the moment we've been working solidarity trying to secure an agreement that would be a positive scenario. but so far it has not succeeded directly call for a cease fire because she this initiative and that an issue there had not been reciprocal vito's rather trying to find a solution working together and really learned that would probably be the path towards finding the solution to this problem to the solos, to addition you probably it in another question you wanted to ask. it is just my

question. is that going back to kind of what to do to get a nuclear war and how it goes? oh, each doctor is the religious slipknot. so you know, there are always accusations for august. we are a new killer cyber rattle. it was here. but i'm, i the one asking the question about the possibility because i'm your, you're the one to ask the question. you weren't pushing me towards this question. and then you'll say that i've been brandishing that lead to their truncheon about, i'm as good as a fairy graves. i'm younger, the us as the only country to of use nuclear weapons during the 2nd world war 2. it's a shame on august socks, 20 kilo tires to the car, tactical nuclear weapons. similarly 775 kill with was just the package with me to the, i mean he comes in. so let's not push the situation to towards the point. so when even a threat, us involved, let alone the new so we need to their weapons. for some reason the west believes

that russia is never going to resort to that. but we've got a new doctor in places and just have a look at it to look what does it say? it says that someone else's action is to just threaten our sovereignty or territorial integrity to then we leave. we have the right to use all the tools we had artist or something. no. and no one should take that lightly or super. officially, there needs to be in the professional view of that when you should. and i am hopeful that everyone across the world is going to receive that in this fashion. when addressing such issues the the

pick up with them for me to put them for the gifts at the side of celia was this because it did just wouldn't care. to get through the new year. oh for g. if i teach the way, know if i'm me teaching the scholars that should thoughtful and you've cheated us. i'm going to last. i look forward to you with that though, she's more, it's a washing machine and then you move, move them on the status from 1st months and most of the amount that lot of to move lately. so with the continuum will just i did i use one for so the lowest the determinant of very to the progressive rock, i used to give a shot finish. this is just all just for good news. i'm a fraction of when you come swing to do friday is a mentor. you ordered the power of people for over the for sure and shoot me an the temperature in

the face board in that direction of nato brings natal closer to the more than ever before. and then i'll tell you exclusively hungaria in a farm and as to stresses that his country will never participate in actions that would escalate the conflicts while you train fit to join nato. and he pointed to the, to the close, it should lead to someone's believes that it's possible to supply such with us with workzone in order to strike our territory. the response could be a symmetric resume. if there was a more go with considering deploying width as to regions within striking distance of countries that have proved targeting russia who need to know if the slums, the falls not receives politicians use to escalate the ukraine. ponce, they continue to get away.