that's the action of nato brings nato closer to the more than ever before. in an archie exclusives the hon gary and foreign minister, stresses of his country will never participate in actions that would escalate events. ukraine, i'm going box hunting, that key of a bit to join. nature only brings the blog closer to more. also a head should age and someone's elite for this festival. the supplies such weapons more so you know, the destruct our territory response to be a symmetric lot of our put in warrens have multiple was considering deploying military hardware to regions within striking distance of the countries that supply weapons to see if. if those arms are used to target russia,

40 people are reported, kills and dozens more wounded in is really our strikes on a you and school in a central galvan refugee who ends communications director for palestine. refugees saves the idea of dr. facility without any prior warnings. some of that is really for service, but they were going to get those cool new there this time, leave this case. the answer to bring in the front must go to the world. this is your r t international. hello and welcome to the use our or may so his behavior is bringing more close or that is according to the hungary and foreign minister speaking exclusively to r t during a major russian economic for peter c. r to stress that's in budapest will never take part in actions which bring nato into direct fighting with russia. while

stressing the importance of holding peace talks to in the ukraine conflict. we argue in favor of the immediate ceasefire and peace, thoughts to be started. and to be respects the all initiatives to make the best buy the respect the efforts of this we says well, or do i have to tell you that um the, the thing that the a peace conference can bring forward, the real substantial uh, results in case uh, both parties of them or are being represented. and obviously it's not going to be the case this time, but the, i'll go there and i'll, i represent my position that instead of the sanctions. uh, you know, um, instead of the 3rd there host by statements. uh, instead of uh, instead of extra ins which are bringing forward the serious risk of escalation that we would need to buy or do we have a very clear position? they made it very clear and um, and the others can not do anything guys, just respected that we'll never participate in actions which way to bring

nato closer to them. more than ever before. we have had a very clear decision uh, in february 2022 or so around february 2022. we nato, which was which said 2 things. first, that nato is not part of the conflict. and 2nd, that we have to do everything in order to avoid the direct confrontation between nato and the russian. and i do believe that um, this uh, quoted in that direction of nato. uh, brings nato closer to the ward, another before. and then we would like to avoid that. so therefore, baby and not participating such kind directions for sure. a mr. c or to speaking whilst in attendance of this in petersburg, international economic for him. its a lot of our putting has also been answering questions from foreign media representatives there. the president said moscow would consider sending weapons to regents that would strike our cutting strike keeps arms, suppliers if russian territory comes under fire. he added that western involvement

and strikes against the russian federation. what am i to direct involvement and moscow reserves the right to retaliate? i mean, normally i'm not, you're welcome. we're thinking that if someone believes it is possible to supply such weapons to award zone in order to strike our territory and create problems for us, then why do we not have the right to supply our weapons of the same class to those regions of the world where there will be strikes some of the sensitive facilities of those countries that are doing this against russia. so the response could be a symmetric for will think about this. and of course, such actions will finally destroy international relations can undermine international security. through ultimately, if we see those countries being drawn into a war against us, and this is their direct participation in a war against russia, then we reserve the right to act in the same way just a moment. all you, this is a fast, a very serious problems and you have the unusual thing to be lazy. there is no need to invent anything and use these ideas to form an opinion about russia forming an

enemy image out of fresh. he's not necessarily your only harming yourself by doing so. you made up that brush who wants to attack may do? are you completely crazy events like this stable? who came up with this seems to it's nonsense. you know we was that's rubbish. it would be nonsense if there was no plan to form their own population which help pressure will attack us soon. we must urgently arm ourselves urgently send to let them through crane. but in fact, why is it being done to maintain their own imperial position of greatness? what premium that is really worth talking about in retrieval? the losses in particular, then the ratio is the same. one to about 5. that's the basis on which we're operating. this, by the way, is the reason for the attempt to carry out the total of mobilization and ukraine because they're a very large loss us on the battlefield. we know from the ukranian side, and this is an open secret, that the us administration is insisting that the threshold be gradually lowered from 25 to 23. then to 20 years,

and then to 18 or immediately to 18. because now they already require registration of 17 year old moist eastern. so we know this for sure. this is a demand from the us administration to the ukranian leadership, which can hardly be considered the leadership of their elections were cancelled. in any case, i think that the us administration will force the current leadership of ukraine to make these decisions, to lower the mobilization age to 18 years. and then they will simply get annoyed up to the last case. right now it's june 2024th. it seems to me that it won't take a year to do all this until the beginning of next year. at least they will tolerate him. and when he does everything, they will say good bye and change him to the the raw several candidates. as far as i understand, could you claim that the similar so if you go into sewage pump, they're all know when the us is interested in ukraine. they are interested in the greatness of the united states, which is fighting not for ukraine and not for the ukrainian people, but for the greatness and forts leadership in the world. and in no case,

do they want to allow any kind of success for russia precisely because they believe that in this case, the leadership of the us would be damaged. that's the gist of what america is doing . well that's still different to that with former us marine corps intelligence office, scott ritter in just a moment scope, but if i can make it personal at for a few moments, you are actually supposed to be in rest of this week at the very same forum we've covered your situation, your ad r t, it's been quite a few days for you. we understand you'll be still speaking at the for him, but what is the latest as regards your c's? passport? there's no new update on this. the passport was seized when i attempted to board the, the aircraft that i was going to be flying to st. petersburg. there was no justification . they simply said on the orders of the state department, they've been making it very difficult for me to find out who it is to call the

customs and border protection. officers weren't helpful. i called their watch commander. he wasn't helpful. i called the state department. they weren't helpful, so i'm in the process of writing a letter in this day of digital communication, i have to write a letter and, and see what kind of response i get. this is a deliberate act on the part of the state department to deny me the ability to travel rushed to russia during this very important time. i was very much looking forward to being in st. petersburg in person. i'm very happy to be able to participate remotely, but it's much better to be there in person. and of course, they canceled the, this causes me to cancel a 40 day tour of russia, where i was bringing in the documentary film crew to the capture, the essence of russia, the reality of russia and bring it back to an american audience. so there's never been a more important time than now for the truth about russia to be told to the american people to overcome the rest of phobia that's gripped this nation. that allows these

policies to be implemented by the, by the ministration without question. and i thought that this documentary would have been a very useful tool. unfortunately, at this point time, that projects on pause. when i know that people are looking forward to your appearance at all, be digitally ask the for and in the coming days as well. and, but just don't what we were listening to there at, from the, at russian president in scots. we've also got us senator is expressing their concern over continued military a to ukraine. that appears to be gathering speed. is it or are those people talking in opposition? are they are liars at the moment. unfortunately, they are outliers. the, you know, i spoke earlier about the danger of russ a phobia. you know, the problem is that the rest of phobia that's been pushed on the american people by

the us government by the mainstream media, empowers the government to enact policies which are not only detrimental to a world peace and security, but detrimental to the security of the united states, nobody needs once or should desire a war between the united states and russia. yet, the by the administration seems to be hell bent on leading us down that path. so it's very difficult for elected representatives to take a strong position against a sitting president on national security issues unless they have the support of their respective constituencies. but when the american electorate has been brainwashed by this rest of phobic misinformation promulgated by the government promulgated by mainstream media, it's difficult for a politician to separate his or herself from the will of the people. and as long as

the will of the people is shaped by dismiss information, this rest of phobia, it's not going to be easy to get a consensus amongst americans, senators and congressmen to move away from the policy direction. we're on right now . unfortunately, the only thing that's going to wake them up is the danger, the imminent danger of war or war itself. but by then it's too late. well, i'm not point related to the russian leader has criticized the us other nato members for providing long range missiles that target russian territory. more specifically, he said, at russia, we'll be thinking about staging weapons in regions around the world where those arms come from. those countries, what's this inevitable? us? absolutely, i mean, 1st of all, let me come says the russian president, for coming up with a, a innovative solution to a very difficult problem because the tendency would be to respond in kind. that is

to directly strike the united states or europe with russian weapons fired by russian personnel. this would be an immediate escalation. what the russian president has done is thrown additional a level of escalation to buy time again. so important things can happen in the united states, like the awakening of public sentiment about the danger of war, so that politicians can join those few outliers and begin to build a credible consensus against war. so the russian president must be commended for coming up with an innovative solution, but it's still an escalation. nonetheless, what does the united states and it's nato allies expect? when you punch russia? russia will punch back. this is inevitable which human nature. and unfortunately, even though this is an innovative solution, it's an escalation that lead just that much closer to at all out war between russia in the west and no pun intended,

but then money will metronome say he support strikes on russia on we'll train you trainings the fly f sixteens. how's this going under the radar? some walk this issue with all the rest of the headlines that's been happening. it's from scott aging, closer to direct conflict. you know, what are the problems again, that comes from this infection of rest of phobia. the grips in the united states is that the american people are susceptible to all sorts of miss information about russia because they don't have a foundation of knowledge and information to assess this information. at this point in time, the american public is being told that the russians are bluffing, that the russians don't have the capacity to stand up to nato. that all this talk about. we are sending weapons to other people, the potential of nuclear conflict. it's just one big bluff by russia. and so when

americans are called upon to assess the statements to be monitored on the kroner, all of schultz or other european leaders or even american politicians. they do so without the fear that the statement should generate fear. because the statements mean that the west is leaning in assuming a posture of conflict, direct conflict with russia, no same person, no rational actor could ever support this. and yet in the united states, in europe, the population listens to the statements of a crone. it says it's, it's okay, rushes bluffing. russia won't respond. a rush is scared. maybe mackay crones pastry and will compel russia to go to the peace table and accept the terms of surrender that are being dictated by vladimir zalinski and the ukrainians. anybody who believes that is so far removed from reality as to be a literal joke. but unfortunately, russ, a phobia clouds the minds and the imagination of the people so infected you

mentioned the ukrainians, ukrainian men of military age are being forcefully conscripted, as you know for the war us, senator taylor greene, describe the situation as a kid. nothing. additionally, it's not them are putting the said that the united states is the model being a lower threshold for conscription in ukraine. your thoughts on, on, if new recruits are fit to fight a lot, come from a military background that is based upon the united states marine corps. we're an all volunteer organization. we are an elite fighting force that wants to do what we volunteered to do. we want to fight, we want to close with and destroy the enemy through fire power maneuver. and we actively engage in training so that we perfect the skills that's necessary. we are motivated to carry out this task. if you put up us up against an opponent that's been kidnapped on the street,

was received no training whatsoever. has no leadership, no equipment, nothing. we will slaughter them. it won't be a massacre. the russian troops are as equally motivated, equally well trained. equally will lead in well equipped as the united states marine corps, and they will go up against these ukrainian soldiers that don't want to be there and lack the ability to effectively resist. this is murder by any other name and the fact that the united states is promoting or promulgating this policy shows the neural vacuum that exist. we are literally asking, need no demanding that ukrainians fight to the last ukranian. what friend, whatever asked a so called friend to do that. this is proof positive that we're not the friends of ukraine. in fact, the united states, by supporting this policy, we are the worst enemies of ukraine because as our policies is guaranteeing that entire generations of ukrainian men will be wiped from the face of the or just

finally, you mentioned earlier, scott, a word i hadn't heard a part from the hon, gary in foreign minister in saint petersburg today talking about a piece in particular piece parks. and it is not something that is discussed at at all from what i can see. i'm on western leads at the spike this year to my, to people in the meat grinder is on the ukrainian front lines. do you anticipate a truce any time soon at all? you know, the problem is for me to answer this question, i would have to presume that i can speak on behalf of the russian government, but i will speak of as a, as a specialist in russian affairs. looking at this from a distance rush, it gave ukraine and the west, a chance for peace. russia put forward a peace treaty in december of 2021. that would have prevented this conflict. had the west, actively engaged in good faith,

russia when it initiated the special military operation, did so with an eye of getting ukraine to the negotiating table to bring this war to an end on terms that when you take a look at the reality ukraine faces today, we're extremely favorable. russia has bent over backwards to promote a peaceful outcome that didn't require ukraine to give up massive amounts of territory or to sacrifice hundreds of thousands have been ukraine in the west, walked away from that. and now russia has lost a tremendous number of minutes. self is poured resources into this war. the idea that russia, after making so many sacrifices that were imposed on them by the refusal of the west to embrace peace, which suddenly disrespect disgrace the sacrifice of the men who have died by giving in, in yielding to the demands of ukraine in the west to seek a piece that doesn't solve the underlying problems. the underlying problem is that

ukraine wants to be a member of nato. and we have now seen because nato will use ukraine is a proxy against russia, giving them weapons to attack russia. this is a cancer that exist next to rush that will infect russia. okay, i'll rush you could allow this cancer to exist is beyond me. so i don't see russia pursuing peace. i see russia seeking to terminate this conflict on the terms, the best benefit them. and then, and only then we'll rush, you'll find a way to learn to peacefully co exist with what's left of ukraine in the west. the views of former us marine corps intelligence officers, scott ritter, scott, we appreciate your time today. thank you. now with wheels having literally fallen off bullying airliners screwed today of the global aircraft joins technical and safety issues house taking center stage. we managed to hear from 2 former company employees,

turned whistle blowers who spoke out in the hope of protecting future passengers. of the department of transportation in the united states as this is the overseer of the f a. and what we've seen is the department of transportation is completely unengaged. they're just not disengaged. they're, they're, they're, they're standing on the sidelines like spectators. they're not really doing anything, notably from a leadership perspective and taking appropriate action. they're kind of just sitting back and waiting. so obviously the direction where the wind blows and then they jump in and point out the obvious take that out with the government as is, is failing us and all the other countries that are out there, depending on the f, a n d o t r are unaware, i think that this is what's happened. we met with the head of the f, a head of yesterday and the head of the depart, our 2nd person ranking, that's a deal t and we gave them 35 recommendations. um, you know, we identified 35 problems and 35 recommendations and as far as we concerned,

they have done none of these. they've ignored all. so what happens is these people go uh, they continue to do with their what they're doing. they continue to get away with making very poor decisions, gross negligence, putting prophets in front of safety, and the risk and everybody's lives. employees specifically, voice concerns about quality gaps and other issues related to the 787. in the time period between 20202022. boeing pushed back saying you can't insure safety and durability. boy, in is putting confidence in the $787.00 dreamliner because of the comprehensive work done to ensure they call it c and low, and some safety of the craft claims about the structural integrity of the 787. i inaccurate the interest rates have been subject to rigorous engineering examination on the u. s. federal aviation administration oversight. so now this is as validated that the aircraft will maintain, its your ability and service lives over several decades. and these issues did not

present any safety concerns. customers continue to be honest, suffering for boeing's mistakes. people forget is that a lot of these airplanes that are in the united states or in europe right now may go to other countries in the future when they're 20 years old or whatever. and those plans need to be safe, right? the people in those countries that you know, maybe they're socio economically challenged or whatever they, they deserve to have safe airplanes. and so, you know, this isn't just about united states obviously, and this is a global, a global issue. there's no excuse only 20 inspectors are present at the boeing plants, even those thousands of people work there. the f a conducted 89 product tests and boeing failed 33 of them. the agency also conducted 13 separate product audits on spirit arrow systems which manufacturers the $737.00 max fuselage. they

receive 7 failing grades. another whistleblower with whom we spoke was joe jacobson, a retired f, a, a safety engineer. i avoid the, the boeing max and that's because i've been tracking all of the in flight issues since it went back into service. i was part of the re certification effort and i know there's still some. 1 safety concerns with the design, but there's also manufacturing defects that we've been tracking. we're seeing for example, um the main up down control device on the air plan is the horizontal stabilizer that's driven by a single motor. and that motor is fail dozens of times since it's gone back into service. and this is on new airplanes. and that's, that's a critical piece of, of hardware. you have to ask, why would such a big story related to human deaths get ignored at pierce and gave his thoughts on

why they're getting away with it, getting away with it because they have, you know, friends in high places. um, but this comes down to leadership for a lot. i mean we want the blowing company to be successful. i mean, one of the things i've learned as a whistleblower and, and in talking with other whistle blowers is, you know, they, they want their companies to do the right thing. but that's why they're, they're disturbed by what they're seeing and they do everything they can to try to bring attention to these matters. slowing is an incredibly important company for united states. so no one wants to see boeing fail because it's, it's too big of a hello to the united states economy is one sam salad. poor, a boeing engineer, testified on capitol hill. do you said that he feared physical violence as retaliation? for his words. again, i raised concerns internally, i was sidelined,

i was told to shut up, i received physical threats. my boss said i would have killed someone who said what you said. his fears are reasonable to boeing. whistle blowers recently died. one from an eye infection. the other from a blow that he is reported to have inflicted on himself. many observers are looking on and saying, what is going on at boeing, a with botkin parssi or the right to the middle east on central? does that not work? 40 people have be killed on dozens, more wounded in an idea of strike on a un school love is according to palestinian authorities, the un communications director for palestine refugee. so that is really hit the facility which is located here in the new serat refugee camp without any warning to be received as a research information this morning. i'm about to have another and sign on on

andras fully in the middle areas and goals where 6000 people who are displaced, where taking shelter and this is a becoming more frequent. we have reported about more than 180 unwrapping things, some facilities. i've been here since before began on the 13th of october last year . so on the mouth, i received stuff try a morning. so my, the is really for says that they were going to hit the school. these are a do to those families who are in the space the answer to bring in that school. there was no warning received before the attack of the claims the about, the israeli forces have put forward this morning. are quite shocking. however, we do not have any a bt around to very we find these games. and once a we keep pulling form, we keep reminding parties through the conflict the in, in gaza is about they should not use the use the suitcase for

ministry. all printing purposes will follow since had been seeking shelter inside the school from id f, a tags, 14 children and 9 women were reportedly killed in the it's really strikes that was wounded, where transported to one of the few functioning, the remaining functioning hospitals. all access were medics are fighting to save their lives. so the idea has confirmed the attack, claiming the unrest school hosted a hum us militant compound, the director of guys and media office. those israel is lying. the occupation uses falls, fabricated stories to justify the brutal crime it's conducted against dozens of display spe, hold as well. today's strike is not the 1st time israel has attacked on risk facilities in gaza. the right thing reportedly over 400 occasions in which the organizations premises have been struck during the war with many sites attack

multiple times in those strikes. at least 450 people have been killed according to local officials, while the unreal communications director, once again saves, there is no safe zones in guest or such as being a very good thing for. whereas the ones, the, all, the more have not the to be in respect to advanced. we need to be to disregard the, to instant message minutes handle, including to the protection on civilians to be an infrastructure, but also include the united nations facilities. we've seen the highest number of eat breakfast, can turn the list medicaid work of the number of women and children and absolutely paid absolutely for respect and violence with brief more finance. so this is why we've been pulling from the very, very beginning of this for, for, and much,

much needed seems fine for the sake of civilians wherever they are in gaza or in israel. i'm for the immediate series of images and also list as one of the most bang for parts on this for when she's been our kids or injured severely injured. many of them, so psychologically cards. it has been a war and children, many, many, many children helping kids during this. doing this for the old heart wrenching, especially when we speak to mothers and fathers and felix to me help us because they can confer the children and tell them, look, it's going to be arise because it's probably not going to be a right to children. and also i've seen one know trying to anywhere in the world shipments with their children as 2 children, locally sustained in golf o and no one is facing casa murphy from a to it goes. and there was no such thing as a full cold save. so on the humanitarians, all these statements about such as owns the existence. i'm just kidding. i'm. they,

in fact the lives of civilians is serious with exactly 80 years ago, the largest, i'm phoebe as lending operation in world history. so allied forces london, the shores of on says norman day global leaders attended the d d anniversary today, including the u. s. president. indeed, joe biden needed a bit of prompting to find his seats before a photo op. literate seemed to try to take a break and find comfort in a chair that actually was there. while i had all the remembrance the allies, griffith allied in the world, the finding conflict, russia did not receive an invitation to the ceremony. in fact, the western needed to have put the courts, let the mirrors the land to be once again, seemingly turning a blind eye to the fact that you train has neo nazi fighters among its actual rocks . r t. steve sweeney picks up the story.