the the, the phillips when it comes to nuclear escalation, we never started this rhetoric. we simply said it should be taken more seriously and they immediately started talking about us brandishing nuclear weapons. we are not put in speak set the flagship plenary session of the st. petersburg, international economics for understanding the country steers clear of escalating any new killer rhetoric and calls for a more serious dialogue with the west culture coming up. medical brick for the russian vaccine for comes for a could soon be ready for human testing. that's according to the country's leading knology experts speaking to archie, also out that forum up north to therapeutic vaccine. it does not protect as

against infectious diseases, the treats individually. those patients who suffer from uncle logical diseases on ukrainian forces. again, shall the don't boss the city of the accounts leaving for peaceful dead until the wherever you're accounting, then use our from across the world today. welcome to our most co studios unto archie international. russia is steadily winning on the bottle field and has no need to resort to the use or even testing of nuclear weapons. that is, according to president clinton, who either the western claims of most schools, a legit intent to deploy nukes or out of touch of reality. so for this the, when it comes to nuclear escalation, we never started this rhetoric. we simply said it shouldn't be taken more seriously, and they immediately started talking about us brandishing nuclear weapons. we are

not, that's the 1st thing. secondly, on the use and non use of such weapons. russia has a nuclear doctrine and everything is written that they use as possible in an exceptional case, in the event of a threat to the sovereignty and territorial integrity of the country. i do not believe that such a case has arisen, but this doctrine is a living instrument and we are closely watching what is happening in the world and around us. and we do not rule out making some changes to this doctrine. this is also related to the nuclear weapons testbed treaty. we once not only signed it but also ratified it, and the americans also signed it but did not ratify it. so in today's circumstances, we have withdrawn our rectification. if necessary. we will conduct tests. for now, there is no such need because our information capabilities, computer capabilities allow us to keep everything up to date with the joining may for a breakdown of the story now. as ortiz saskia taylor. yes,

some big remarks there as well. take us through the significance, even the timing as well, of these at presidential remarks on nuclear weapons under use. they're all, while you listen to the white house, downing street pretty much were of the west and media and you would believe, but it's not them appear to be sitting in the kremlin, is profiting and cannot get in recent weeks. took about these end of the walls, lessons have really reached a fever pitch. so it is, i'm surprised that the topic was raised at the suitcases. that for him with the russian need just to be on the pink time that states in very class setting the record straight moscow has no intention of deploying it to the weapons. and for critics who might not take him on his what. okay, well then let's just look at some of the fun. let's. let's take a moment to compare russian on western commitment to meet can of to tyrants over the years. yes, russian does have the largest new to the ultimate in well spots in 2002,

washington pulled out of the abm treaty in 2019 washington pulled out of the i n. f . treaty in 2020 washington pulled out of here from scully's, treat. him in 2023, washington separate and no longer shot me to the on the data with most go as of the terms of the new start treaty. i'm also hearing now, but that's costing doubts about the future of that adult 2 months as well. and it's washington, which is now saying things like this. we may reach a point in the coming years, or an increase from current deployed numbers is required. if that date does come, it will result from a determination that more nuclear weapons are required to deter our adversaries and protect the american people and or allies and partners. we need to persuade our adversaries that managing rivalry for arms control is preferable to unrestrained competition across domains. a successive us administration's control on

each of our arms control treaties, the west can dive as far as we had and potentially boost. it's also and frame it as just being competitive, but washer was somehow the one who's holding the walls to atomic one. so i'm, i'm also, i, i can't help but just to remind what we will know of one thing. there is any one country in old walt animal human history which has actually deployed via timing from the us in japan in 1945 twice and with a pool of a 1000000 people to launch the civilians. what killed defend a strong signal to the soviet union about american might. so really, any attempts to portray russia as a global risk in this regard should be comical to anyone who knows even a page of history yet barely a day goes by. we're in western headlines, broadcast the, the specter of the, as you saying you, tara armageddon, devastation raises its head. why know what more than 2 years into the you can

conflict, why skit is the topic of mutual weapons creeping in? once again. do you think? well, we do seem to be entering a particular phase in the role and ukraine, ukrainians on tying and the thousands i'm terrorist. evidence of that is the cube is literally driving its man of the streets to feed the front. but frontline is daily moving and russian space on the west is faced with this reality, but it's money, it's weapons, it's a pool. that is one failed to secure and 2 nets at the victory that promise not just be ukrainian people but its own people. but it functions in the meantime have managed to, to, um, to, to rate their economy bring about huge multiply routine data on the rise ation. so to distract from this failure, they resort to fame ongoing kind of cool. so like you said, there is no way to fit then the end of the wald, it's not an approved teams, have taken it upon himself to expose the defunct, the narrative that is being spun out. but i think there was definitely

a sense that this, this was, was a rift ration of red nines. he said that that session, the all new to the doctrine is if i replayed, no new unless we space and existential threat unless russia is on to attack on like, of course, the us, which has of foss choice. we're going to see the reality though, is the russian light, well, come under attack from west and west buttons off the weeks of wrong doing it now. so in spite of the office, the west has given, he has the green light to use its weapons, destroyed the deep into russian territory to moscow. well, what's the thing out to some extent you spoke with a for him is taking people's potential targets, plus on top of that you have a pay or in the region code and which has engaging in sir re dangerous talk about all moving off. i'm borrowing news from american express. russia is increasingly militarized into cleaning grad region. recently it has been

relocated and it's nuclear weapons developers, if our allies decide to deploy nuclear weapons as part of nuclear sharing and our territory as well, in order to strengthen the security of negatives eastern flank, we're ready for it. so it's hard to know, it's to see both days move as a school, a tori and provocative. but that really is the package. all that we have to look at . one of this, against now, there is a cause, it's a straight to west, which is losing control, which is ramping up rhetoric, which is ramping up the conflicts which is really driving this irresponsible, took about the conflict on we have must go ahead and try to get through to who's winning on comm, heads to prevail, put in. so just reminding nato and co, the russian, like anyone else does have a right to defend itself. the question of course is whether there is increasingly right just politicians and brussels london on washington will take sheet up this morning. very big question at bringing us the background into those remarks today

are to substitute taylor so let's get thank you for the dates. freaking out the st . petersburg, international economic for the president also touched upon the legitimacy of the authorities in key. if he stays, there is no room for interpretation when it comes to the nation's own constitutional restrictions on the presidency, which loving their zalinski has held onto. despite his term expiring last month, you can just put a medium within your needs, but that much the yes, there are problems here, of course, because of the current authorities appear to have lost a legitimacy. him and even a cursory analysis of ukrainian legislation shows that they have lost their legitimacy. there is the 3rd article of the constitution which says that the president is elected for 5 years only. and there is an article $8.00 to $3.00 of the constitution of ukraine, which says that under martial law, the powers of the vehicles in the can be extended. but nothing is said about extending the powers of the president. we are ready for negotiations,

but only i repeat on the terms that we agreed to when we started these negotiations in minutes and then continued and assembled and not on so made up ideas. but even if we mean to take those agreements and assemble as a basis, we must still proceed from the realities of to day. we seem to forced to mobilization in ukraine. of course, in the age of mobilization, they will be lowered, we know reliably from ukrainian sources that the americans have set conditions for their continued support by lowering the mobilization age to $25.23, then 20 and 18 or perhaps straight down to 18. what is important for us? they are now recruiting around 30 to 50000 the month before last. i think they recruited 70000. so this means that any new recruits will really be feeling the loss of this speech by russian president vladimir putin was colossally important that this planet plenary session of the st. petersburg, international economics for him. he talked a lot about how the multi polar world has developed over the past several years. the achievements it's made. and the plans that the multi polar world has in turn in

terms of how to develop further in the future as well. and this, the, this growth fits extreme growth that we've seen according to the russian president is being spurred on by explosive development and growth in the tech industry. specifically, he said that it's changing entire industries, entire sectors of the economy throughout many african and asian countries. in the multi polar world, that according to the russian president are going to be the leaders of tomorrow's multi polar world. they're going to be developing very quickly. and, you know, russia is also a country that's in asia. it's no exception. he spoke about how russia has got some serious plans for developments throughout the country, specifically at a regional level, specifically developing the countryside and creating new business opportunities there, as well as creating new jobs for working class people throughout the russian federation . and some of these plans have already been put into effect actually. i mean, the russian president talked about the extremely significant accomplishments that

russians made in the economics fear. over the past several years when so called western experts said that the russian economy was going to collapse. and in this year the russian present also mentioned that the russian economy has seen economic growth of over 5 percent in the 1st quarter of this year. we took them push level that was made last year and as you know, russia's g, d, p growth was 3.6 percent. and in the 1st quarter of this year it was 5.4 percent. in other words, our rates exceed the global average. we have set a goal of becoming one of the 4 largest economies in the world, by the way, according to some data, including estimates by the world bank. just last week, the world bank made additional calculations and put russia in 4th place. we ended up ahead of japan, russian president vladimir putin space paid a special attention to the role of dollar dominance in the world. really, he spoke about how trade between multi polar countries is increasingly being

conducted using national currencies. and if this is something that needs to continue to increase and countries can do that, as well as trade on a win win basis by basically continuing to participate in briggs as well. but in terms of actual dollar dominance, it's not only trading and national currencies and increasing cooperation between multi polar countries. that's basically kelly in dollar dominance. according to the russian president. it's also the actual policies of washington that it becomes self defeating and are destroying the number one weapon, economic weapon that the west has had for so many years to dominate the world. and that is the dollar. but it's in the middle of look at the breakdown with system died a long time ago. it was replaced in 1976 by the jamaican system. the baton with system was based on gold equivalence. in 1976, the united states decided to move away from the gold equivalent,

and the jamaican system was created, which on hook the dollar from gold, the basis of this jamaican system, which is still in force today, is the trust in the american economy. look what is happening today in reality, there is no other collateral in today's world financial system than trust in the american economy. and of course, the united states exploits its monopoly position in the global financial market. they make serious money from this exploitation, according to publicly available data. the united states owes the world economy, $54.00 trillion dollars. my colleagues and i came to the conclusion yesterday that the american authorities are like the luddites in england. they bring the equipment on which they work. they are breaking their instruments of greatness. the dollar is one of the few instruments of greatness left in the united states. today, there was the president of zimbabwe participating at this plenary session as well. and i think one of the main things we have to start with here was one of the initial statements he made in his uh, opening statement at this plenary session,

he called vladimir putin, his brother. i mean, this is a really important thing to understand. that's in bob, wy and russia have very close relations in terms of their multi polar world, as well as the relations that they've had that go back to the times of the soviet union. really because the soviet union, of course, helps these in baldwin, independence move in during its war for independence and good relations. but when russians and bob, i go all the way back to the mid 20th century. and this also goes back to the fact that both countries share a tradition of anti imperialism of uh, cooperation based on when, when cooperation and written mutual respect as well. and this is something a very important that is in baldwin president mentioned it is good to me and unacceptable. but the correlative worst, a good deal is do this, you hedge money tendencies,

but bluntly violates so written, equality of nations, unit color to is no place in modern a globe of politics. and in the nice most economic lessons in a situation where some was in the country is try to detect to us who uh, friends, we offer this would be we also never detergents, boston's and bubbling. we go forward, remove all of the legal sanctions that the big our can i make the development of the gulf because most of the people knows about where it was that they demanded that loans to be united to the people and the people to be visited with that land, he wasn't the only other leader on the panel. during the plenary session, there was also the president of bolivia who spoke a lot about the treatments of the bolivian economy. he said that capitalism is in

a crisis. and in bolivia, they've created an economic system that is socially oriented and that it proves to the worlds that's an alternative economic system that doesn't involve the sort of pressure and exploitation of the western worlds that it imposes on the rest of the world. that, that doesn't have to exist. let's go, let's go moodle today. the whole order is moving towards a more fair and balanced state based on the multiple battery and multilateralism. and of course, we expect that will be various discussions, transitions to new multiple, actual multiple model of the world economy, in which, without any doubt, will be able to learn from the available experience of the russian economy and see what a serious role we will have in the world, this is an exchange that is very important for everyone, especially for the countries that are represented here. many which have been victims of this model of economy. which is divided into centers and prefers weight and believe it believe that the opportunity to belong to the big script is an excellent prospect for our country to put into action to transform ation of our

country together with accelerate the industrialization of economies of this block. the breaks block have been able to break the hedge and many of the united states. and there are hopeful cooperation and complimentary between country square. see, we are proof that there is an alternative to dollar based neo colonial was which wants to other economies to depend on it. but we undermine that once under water water. another thing we heard from the bolivian presidents that we heard from all the other speakers on this panel there's and bob and president vladimir putin, of course, is one of the main themes of the st. petersburg, international economic for them. that's that the multi polar world is developing on the basis of mutual respect and when, when cooperation and it will continue to do so in the future. so those, that's basically a rundown of the major takeaways of this very, very important plenary session that took place at this years. for now, a world changing scientific breakthrough could be on the horizon here in russian. the country's leading immunization specialist states has centralized, successfully tested a counsellor boxing mice and hopes to start trying it on schumann. by next year we

got the details from alexandra ginsberg himself on the exciting developments also office in petersburg for as the 0. and this is not a universal vaccine. on the contrary, it is a personalized vaccine, not only for each type of cancer, but also for each respective cancer patient. yes, and it's a therapeutic vaccine. it does not protect against infectious diseases. it treats individually those patients who suffer from uncle logical diseases. this drug, this vaccine, figuratively speaking, is a little vulgar. but it directs the immune system of a patient against malignant cells due to the fact that this vaccine carries in its composition. those changes that are characteristic at the genetic level for a tumor. as a result, our patients immune system recognizes individually both those cells into which the

vaccine has entered and cancer cells. and it begins to destroy them with the help of special cells that are present in our immune system. site have toxic lymphocytes which literally devour those cells that carry tumor markers. this accordingly is the meaning of this vaccine. now at the gamma ly institute, we're working with colleagues from our 2 leading cancer centers, hurts and center under the leadership of professor catherine and the blow consent are under the leadership of academicians, delevie, and with our young colleagues from the serious center, a system has been created that allows us to genetically deliver the necessary genetic sequences to our you carry out excels. these methods and technologies are completely covered by domestic patents, which makes it possible to use them widely and completely openly to create medicines. and the 1st speech is about prototypes of vaccine drugs created against a melanoma. this is the most malignant and severe uncle logical disease. and the

mouse melanoma model shows that 3 vaccine variants created using this technology protect these animals from deaf 4 people have been killed. the further $43.00, including children wounded, and then you creating an attack on a residential area of live guns. more than 2 dozen buildings in the done by the city were damaged as well on friday, western supplied attack and ms. silas were used according to the russian defense ministry, finished journalist. yeah, let's put con and he's in the accounts. can talk this through the latest attack. what we see here are the remains of the western weapon system, which stops today. today's 7th of june, just behind me, the western results truck directly to the area most of the region people's seas. that's kind of her destruction of the

peaceful sea. as we all know here, there is no military installation in the city center to see the feel. the heavy effect what we felt in the morning we had 12 blocks that were what we know about the flight 6 results. and here, disruption in many parts of the city, mainly human lives lives where most here today, really in so serious where unfortunate beginning of summer they were injured dirty for steam here. still more movie story building has collapse. of people are in show. they have was basically, every, this is the way i'll do. great. new forces are using the width as we talk, even from the broad directly to the city and area

the nothing more than double standards. that's the stump. russian foreign ministry spokesman maria's, the heart of a has slapped on the so called western agenda, including attempts to bring kids into the e. u for of the e, as each country still failed to meet or continue to fail to meet the basic principles that candidates must fulfill will never meet those criteria. and everyone knows that much more over. there are literally being drag that against the will of the peoples of other countries and those countries that will like to join for objective reasons, primarily economic ones. and i'm referring to economics because all through the european union was originally convinced as an economic organization, the states have systematically improved on the ma cuz the necessary for joining the european union. and they will not accept it, although they keep them on the hook for a long time, developing, so to speak, to pull up even more tech. here is

a very specific examples. this suggests that we're talking about double standards in literally every aspect of the western approach to international agenda. when most of those response comes on the heels of reports, the e u commission is preparing to recommend opening an official dialogue with you, praying to become a block member will that be on the mind of europe and citizens today, i'll say accounts their hopes to decide who representing them in the confidence parliament? here's the take of our 2 contributor ritual north of the european union, parliamentary elections now under way across the 27 nations. lock until sunday are an opportunity for citizens to democratically express once every 5 years how they feel about the competence of the current european establishment. so how's that been going lately? this war is we coming russia's economic perspective for decades to come. what the russian economies collapse in portland is still getting money, but he can hardly spend it and time is not working for russia. it is working

against russia. the european parliament would help ukraine in any way possible to advance on all the necessary steps on the 2 repeating foss. okay, so maybe all those anti russian, you sanctions did not bring russia to its knees. it brought some other people to their knees economically though europeans, whoops. queen ursula vander line. i'm elected european commission president is living rent free in her office or, or next to her office at the commission building, getting free utilities and pocketing 2600 year olds in housing allowance because she's living rent free. so guess it's kind of tough to relate to the skyrocketing energy prices and inflation slamming the average european voter as a result of anti russian you policy. so it's not exactly a big shock that voters would be gravitating to anti establishment parties right now, particularly ones on the right way. that also happen to be attacked so publicly

and so often and so overly by the establishment. the voters know pretty much for sure that those particular parties probably have the least to do with the current mess. french president, a menu as not home with 70 percent disapproval and german chancellor. all actual right behind at 69 percent disapproval is just such a mystery to these guys why people with wire taken electoral chance on parties. like, for example, germany's alternatives for deutsch 9th, that sound like they're talking basic, common sense on everything that the establishment has screwed up policy wise from ukraine to energy tv for home for the tourist delivery must be categorically reject sage. the chancellor is responsible for ensuring the gym and he does not become a potty of water. the only reasonable solution is the loan ship node stream to even

if the gas storage facilities are full. this will be enough for about 3 months in the winter. and what's next, audiology should give way to real politics. guided by facts, has nato's leading power carried out an attack on our country's vital, critical infrastructure in european waters? if so, one would have to question whether the alliance has ensuring security in europe or rather jeopardizing it here in front of somebody in your pens right wing populist national rally party is set to take up to 4 times the seats of mac hose when they saw party, not surprising when it's so says found that 38 percent of french voters see the will actions as just an opportunity to stick it to mac hall, even though he isn't even running for any seed himself. nor is the pen, but she must be saying something that seems to resonate with voters, maybe, and things like this. but at least as for the sanctions against russia, i'm telling you they are ineffective to deal. did they ruined parts of our own

agricultural sectors. and they had no real impact on the russian economy. and no, the only impacts they had were on the french economy. france and germany are not the only european countries with anti establishment parties using ukraine as a wedge issue against their establishment opponents. henry's victor or bond is playing up the need for peace as opposed to continued war and neighboring ukraine to such as fit test party apart from its conservative opponents in what shaping up to be a tight race. we won't go to war, we won't leave our homes heading east for the 3rd time. we won't go to the russian fonts again. we've been there. we have nothing to do there. so now it sounds like the other candidates in these e will actions are adopting a similar playbook. ukraine is the most corrupt country in the world. and suddenly european started giving tens of billions of heroes to such a country. i heard the president zalinski is mother in law, bought a villa in egypt for several $1000000.00,

and we still wonder where our money is going. if the same time frames are popping up all over europe, it's only because the same issues are being imposed like a strait jacket on the entire block. which is why farmers from france and germany to the netherlands in poland have taken to the streets against the bureaucratically stifling you common agricultural policy that added the extra burden of privilege, low cost access of ukrainian farming products to the common market, driving down the prices of the products of local european farmers, the then there's the crime and cost of living crisis fuel by the energy crisis, but the even post on itself when biden told it to do something cool too impressed. it's girlfriend zalinski. so brussels went like okay, yeah,

watch this. see how much i love you and promptly shut off the gas from russia. so how is that new relationship going corporate across the euro area. we're exposed to and continue to face different energy costs with consequences for the gross. the energy price shock, which has had europe and economies disproportionately affected vx hold price competitiveness negatively. mainly through high up production costs. got a level the passive language. they're like corporate or magically just exposed to these bad things. and it was the energy price shock that kind of dropped the sky like a meteor, i guess the mysteriously just hit smashed into european national economies. so hey, what do you do? look, when you're, it's cheap rushing gas that gave it a competitive advantage over the us only to end up buying gas from the us and whatever high price. uncle sam feels like charged for it. it's no wonder that things are going to well, who could have possibly predicted that, and whose fault is that? well, your teen folders seem to know. and this allows.