so brussels went like, okay, yeah, watch this, see how much i love you and promptly shut off the gas from russia. so how is that new relationship going corporate across the euro area. we're exposed to and continued to face different energy costs with consequences for the gross. the energy price shock which has had europe and economies disproportionately affected vx hold price competitiveness negatively. mainly through high up production costs. got a level the passive language. they're like corporate or magically just expose to these bad things and it was the energy price shock that kind of dropped the sky like a meteor, i guess the mysteriously just hit smashed into european national economy. so what do you do when you're did? it's cheap. russian gas, it gave it a competitive advantage over the us, only to end up buying gas from the us and whatever high priced uncle sam feels like charged for it. it's no wonder that things aren't going to well. who could have possibly predicted that, and whose fault is that?

well, your p and voters seem to know. and this selection seems like it could very well end up reflecting that a global policy research or towards the well a phase. brussels actually seems more worried about pulling the 2 eastern european countries further away from russia. a nice a ukraine. no. moldova is remotely ready for the e. u membership as they are both of the very poor countries of the both economic boss get cases. and they still incident, they both do extensive economic activity with the russia and um they go and politically, of course, there's a obese in though democracy in the ukraine. and as the as a crackdown on a free speech and democratic activity. and most though,

the only reason the use going ahead with this nonsensical project of having tools about to eat membership session quote, you great and well do it is to stick it to a rough. it is somehow to make an anti wash or positive, but none of it has anything to do with the uh well being of the uh, the member states of the you. that's our last for not, but our programs. well, they are just getting started to see what's showing river. you're catching us from today in moments. goodbye. the

. what should we make of the bike ceasefire, which apparently originated in israel study is really government fails to own. is this merely cheap domestic political past dream or a reflection of the moral rocks of american foreign policy? probably by the the hello again everybody. i'm rick sanchez, is a direct impact on this is what we're going to be talking about in this conflict in a way that is durable and lasting. that doesn't ensure that is real is finding

another war against the past and people did you hear it? you just heard this golf course into the us state department accidentally tell the truth. i'm rick sanchez. let's do this the . all right, so let's get started. something really fascinating happened yesterday at the us state department, the p r guy, right. the guy works there who reporters often accused of being a bit of a bold faced liar regarding u. s. foreign policy. then again, i guess that's his job, right? well, he accidentally accidentally told the truth yesterday. it just kinda slipped out of his mouth. i guess when he was being honest, when he said this in this conflict in a way that is durable and lasting, doesn't ensure that is real is finding another war against the past, and people in 3 months or 6 months, or even a year or 2 years and in

a way that provides real security for palestinians and israelis. why did you hear that the did you did? i don't know if you heard it because it was stuck in the middle of it. so let's do this. i'm going to pull it out and have our guys over here play that for you again here. listen now, to in this conflict in a way that is durable and lasting, doesn't ensure that is real as buying another war against the past. and people of war with the palestinian people, he just said, israel is a war with the palestinian people. did he say that? because that's what he really thinks. because when he's in private and not in front of a bunch of reporters when he's not being paid to try and sway what they think, that's what he really says a, by the way, when a reporter tells miller that's matthew miller, that what, what, what he just did what he just said, he said it's, that's about what i meant. thank you for correcting me. in fact, it was exactly exactly what he met because that is the truth. let me help you here

in 2005. israel told all non palestinians who were settlers living and gaza. yes. gov. i used to have his railways and palestinians living together is real. emily, scholars say they did that. they asked all the israeli citizens who were living there to get out. they told all the settlers to get out, you know, why they did that so that they could turn gaza into a fully occupied country. they couldn't do those would, would, would you know, with israelis living there, you know, since then palestinians and gaza had been forced to live in her run the sudden brutal conditions. once they got the good guys out where every couple of years, the idea of goes in and quote, most of them down moles the law. and that's what they've said though their words. well, since the terrible attack on israel, on october 7th, israel has killed 36000 palestinians about 36000 members of hamas,

36000 palestinians, and more than 10000 of them are children. so let me repeat with matt miller accidentally told the truth. that's exactly what he meant. that israel is at war with the palestinian people. manila? yeah, rick, i mean, so matt miller, we, we know he's a paid propagandist. right. so the question is, is this a forward in slip, you know, reviewing the, the true, unconscious thought or just simply a flaw break? i mean, i'm no fan of matt miller ever since. back in his m. s. n. b c contributor days during the trump years. well, i believe that this onset onslaught on gaza is exactly that a deliberate attack on civilians. but to be fair, i will cut them a little slack here, rick on some floods here and there. when you speak for a living, rick, you and i both know this, these blogs happen to everyone,

but the difference is that most people aren't in front of cameras to catch them saying it or in front of a room full of reporters. and now that said, we heard matt lee of the he's a legend in that state department. press room. i've been around him very fair, always on it. he called out matt miller on that, on that swab, forced him to defend his position on garza, and that's exactly the right thing to do or reporter the right. there's no way the less of what you know by the way. and here to, i'm going to give them some prompts here. when you watch those state department briefings, you get more news out of that. not just from what is said, but also from what is not said. and just as then you would from any newscast on m as nbc fox, cnn, the new york times all combined because they actually do have some interesting exchanges there. i, i agree with you my point about matt miller saying this whether he meant to say it, whether it was a mistake, whether we should forgive him, whatever. what he actually said was, the truth is, will,

is it more with the palestinian people? 36000 members of a mazda have not been killed. 36000 palestinians had been killed. right, right, right. i mean, there, there is no way for any of us to know exactly what's in mat miller's head or in his heart. and maybe it is our personal bias. but for me, i'm going with the slab on just one little no, actually no, i'm going with a freudian slip. i know it was a slug at the 40 and slip and, and, and the state department spokesman knows full well because like you said, the numbers bear that out, of course. so i think the evidence is just in the numbers alone. you're saying deep down in the recesses of his mind, his brain. he probably believes that and that's maybe why a slip. that's fair, i get it. and we can disagree on that. all right, let's talk about something else. the election results in india, this is fascinating. there in the media,

got it wrong. the vast majority of the journalist, the community, all over the world, including me, this guy right here. i told you that prime minister mowdy would when i even went as far as to say, do you remember, did you watch the show that i did on this? i went as far as to say that he was almost universally beloved and he would. he would win this thing in a landslide. i was so wrong. and the people of india all 600000000 of them who cast ballots told me so. bodies party get, by the way, can you believe that 600000000 people voted 600000000 bodies party that usually gets enough votes to govern parliament without having to form a coalition? did not win enough boats this time around. technically it's still a win and he will leave the country. but there is no question that the indian people, no question. i say they're, they're sending him a message as is his opponent. yeah. the thing that this election is that the country has unanimously and clearly stated. we do not want mr. not in the movie.

and mr. i'm it shot to be involved in the running of this country. i do not like the way they were on this country. that is the head of the, the opposition party in the as opposite role gun, the basking and blasting at the same time. so i mean, what do you think? manila, what name? here's the question. what made so many people who in the past have loved this guy, cherish this guy voted for this guy, mowdy suddenly turn against them. a well look wreck. i appreciate you being humble in saying you got it wrong, but you didn't actually get this totally wrong. so 1st, let's point out that india is the largest democracy on earth, the staggering 6 week election process took this long to finally get through 640000000 votes that were cast. this is moody's actually his historic 3rd

term when as prime minister, his of him do base b j. p party and their allies known collectively they're called the in the a. they want $293.00 seats, which is far short of that land slide. they were expecting a $400.00 seats. the collective coalition, also known as the india. they want 234. so the total seats for grabs was $543.00, rec. so we know that that moody is a nationalist, he's known as a strong man. the b j p. they did secure a commanding majority and in this election, but their popularity has declined since 2019 elections. back then the b j. p. secure a 303 seats. they were expecting 400 right time. but the polls seem to indicate that the slide is due to younger indian voters voting in the other direction. yeah, he was a bit of a hard line and was perceived that way by many. and i think that may have caught up with them. but like you said, he's still one is just that he used to win like this. and now he's way like this.

exactly. and that's, that's basically it's from what say, here's the when bailey now he wins literally all right. 80 years after it happened . 80 years after it happened, european leaders have gathered in normandy to commemorate to the feet of nazi germany. the allies were defeated. the nazis, as we know, were principally the russians, the americans and the brits. so who was invited, the americans, the french, the brits, and not the russians though they did by far most of the heavy lifting and that war and who else was invited by the way. this guy acts this book is on that plane. you're about to see him get off regardless of whatever differences may exist between washington and moscow. and there are plenty not inviting russia is about this honest and petty,

but inviting this non elected leader of ukraine. seems even worse. you know why? because ukraine had and continues to have to this day, a real record of supporting nazis. everything i'm about to tell you, by the way, sadly, is historical fact that you could find anywhere just google it. when german troops marched into ukraine. in 1941, they were welcome with how hitler banners, soon after 34000 jews were rounded up, marched into the fields and slaughtered. this was done by ukrainians, while washington's at the time were not invited to normandy or fighting the nazis and eventually defeating them. so fine, you're going to probably look at me and say ok, sanchez, that's fine. but that was a long time ago. right wrong. today, many of ukraine's military units still adorned themselves, right? with nazi emblems, logos and symbols under uniforms. they march to the tune of white nationalist and

neo nazi chance, but there's more i'm not done. in recent years, ukraine has erected a lot of statues honoring ukrainian nazis who helped killed the jews during world war 2. the most famous of all of them is this guy named steve ben there and look them up. stephen ben, there is his name or staff or whatever. who, according to a recent report on n b, c, news has now more than a dozen monuments verifying him in keys. ukraine. those are just facts. it's a funny way of commemorating normandy as far as i'm concerned, manella. yeah, rick, this is yet another effort to rewrite history, to obfuscate the truth. the soviets lost some 27000000 people in this fight. this shows that we are right back where we were 40 years ago, when in 1984 at the height of the cold war, ronald reagan attended the 1st major de de come m ration in france. and at that

time, no soviet leader was present for that as well. and then we looked at the hypocrisy o off shots was there representing germany in case we forgotten the world was at war against. a germany hello, not to mention like you said, you cranes, west or flank was full of not the collaborators, but then there's the last b and the collected west seems to be doing its darned us to prevent any sort of diplomacy. and god forbid there be an appearance of an olive branch, extend it to russia because rick, you can't continue a war if you act remotely, civil and honor a shared history. yeah. not look up. you can dislike russia. it's certainly within your means to do so. you can dislike president boynton, you can look this lead, drop and go, you can dislike costs, you can dislike any government. but there's a difference between not liking somebody and not giving someone there do. and i think what's really petty about this in many ways. you mentioned that the, the,

the negating history was saying, oh, it didn't happen because i don't like that person or that country anymore. it seems childish. it seems petty. and it strips away of the credibility of people like at the state department and this particular administration went past administrations, have never gone that far or been that petty my opinion. but here we are. thank you manila, we appreciate it. when we come back, we're going to discuss 11 on this is important. look all this attention on gaza. but what about 11 on what's going on there? is that next political commentator and journalist layla, how to who will join us from 11 on there she is. we're having some problems we should born because as we speak is real is jamming signals in the area where she is . might have some technical gifts, but you know what we're going to do. this will be right back. stay with us. the

russian states never as one of the most sense community invest, not getting all sun set up, the same assistance must be the one else calls question about this, even though we will then in the european union, the kremlin media mission, the state on russia to de escalate the ortiz vote net keeping our video agency roughly all the band on youtube. the tv service was for the question, did you say steven twist, which is the

say, welcome back. i'm re sanchez on this passion a day with so much news. you know, with all the attention recently on guys who everybody seems to be paying attention to obviously and for good reason many have failed to see what's happening right now . and level which may end up being as important, maybe even more. so at some point, i want you to take a look at what's going on there right now. the see that video that you're looking at right there, that bombing, that showing shows is really targeting as early as targeting and bombing areas of southern lebanon. it is a part of the fighting that has been taking place out for weeks now or has intensified to here. uh, the israelis. they've been doing it for almost 8 months now. but just lately it's been worse. they're trying to attack has buller now. it's intensifying to a level where nothing. yeah. who is now saying that he's prepared for another

upcoming operation, another gaza perhaps laid out how to him is the editor chief of middle uncensored. and she is good enough to join us now from uh, 11 on, late about thank you so much for joining us. how are uh, how are things? uh, they are right now. the country and the eastern sex around this. but the woman is relatively call for basically some, and that's a boeing earlier this morning. and in the afternoon, the western and the center sectors are the ones that got most of the hits. and especially i said one at some point to another. but these are phones, most of your viewers, so they don't all they have to go on google. it. what i can say is, as of last line, after midnight, this really is been very so actually news been worth things not much today, as opposed to the previous weeks, because has bella used for the 1st time. it's a defense systems to qual, as really advanced or trying to actually break the song that you're over the eastern district. and they actually push them out of the bodies over in the air

space. and that's closer to that, another escalation. and then use that. and the flight that has been ongoing for the past 8 months. i have so many questions for you, but let me just start with this cuz people are watching us from all over the world . and they're trying to figure out, since this conflict between israel and 11 on has really been going on since 1982. and it's gotten stronger and weaker and then stronger and it stops. and it starts. what makes these particular last 8 weeks or months? it's different what, why are we, why do we need to take pay more attention now? okay, if you just me and i don't mean that one on supplies with is very occupation forces . it has been ongoing since 1949 when we find the arms price agreements with them at the bottom was the only country that's actually the honor. that's our misplaced, my goodness of is there just since 1949 is really rich that and 1967 when they are flexible and which had, will have been set up is there to contact the fine, including a skip is jenna is actually so that including nickel,

but it's probably towards the general leading does for and 1978. they invaded level for the 1st time. and then the again, this and 1982 the fights between has all and is ready to start the. i don't like it, i think to the 1986. however, before that there was the major for the been all the news business inspections, i guess is it is what makes it special. no says october 8. i'm from now is basically the, the that the databases are some stuff on their hands, but we have 6 or 7 functions. now forcing himself up under all of these, except for the functions of the hosting and helping them out to support what's happening and got them. so they've drawing attention away from guzman, and they're trying to, the clip is really of forces off of the, basically an arm stocks and basically the energy. and they have succeeded so far in doing so. the reason is that there's been a fee and has fall under the menus phones more than any other phones because they are the most drain. they have for physic weapons. that's not the best. the other phones they don't have. so now we have air defense systems, and this will the shop for those various as well. for the 1st 7 weeks,

this has escalated because of the kind of what the people had been introducing. it was actually been uses and stuff but was escalating, it's from it's side. this rate is well, that would make a very different scenario. i mean, i'm just thinking to myself, i'm not an expert in military affairs, but it's really easy to bump garza and kill civilians who are pretty much defenceless. it might be a little different ball game when you go into southern 11 on and you have to take on his bullet, which isn't essentially a non official army with some 100000 troops, correct the best. so actually, i mean the look at it this way. for the past 8 months, we've lost about $400.00 markers, including a 120 years markers that artist has bullfighters and other resistance groups from an movement, some fee and others. what else basically back in 2006, when we had the additional 11 on july 2000 makes basically it has the last and 50 for this 250 strikers. so in 8 months they actually knew how to

play the game. they know how to get the resources of this video. and so i always like basically they, they are doing the hip and drunk kind of fight to go to the orphan. but there's an escape even find them where they are. so why so why? so why would um, why would is we don't want to do this at a time when the world is watching them at a time when the world is criticizing them. when they have their hands full in, in gaza. why would is we'll and i read what they've said. i just started reading better gats and all these guys. they are firing off the sword and the rattle and they're saying we're going there next and we're going to kill them all. and this is going to be huge. why would they do that? and why would they say that? all right, so, so you have to different groups and is there at the moment then? yeah, on his book and then it goes on his book the account and they don't get it where like prolonged florida. this is why he prefers the guns award because the longer that's what it extends. he can stay in power. remember that those people are

basically divided against 10 didn't. right. and i didn't, i guess. so, yeah, any goes cuz i gave some of these things, but he's going to be the next 5 minister by any guns as being supported by the american since they want. so the whole idea is that i'm using it basically, and then i can do that all pressuring us on. yeah, hold that or basically the ending in for everything that's happening when he gets on the other hand basically does what the americans do or ask him to do. and since the beginning of this war on some, the americans had always wanted to the get the resources of hezbollah at some point or another if they wants to control the extent of the 3. and indeed them because as well as the majors or the main threats of them being that to control the energy resources in the eastern mediterranean as basically nothing on the buttons on the fields of, of gus and, and the of the but were you. but i'm, i'm going to study for a minute because you, i just think for me anyway, you made some news year or something. we don't often hear the west that the united states is more for benny gas and they are for nathan yahoo! and farther we could have deduced that further, they'd like to see benny dance become the prime minister. they find him to be more

valuable and they can use them as a tool to a god not really has bola, but who they're really after, which is iran. am i correct in my assessment that 2nd degree? yes you are. i mean think about the tool visit to the washington and the rest of the month, many guns. and then you also have to go and get basically the diplomats in washington. and for me, think with that we've been in guns, but again, the number that americans have scream basic is that they went forward with level he was the one who was actually calling for one of the level along with those workshopping for him. we're talking about how they view and i think what the isaac was she for stuff at the end, basically, and other army generals. so if you look at it this way, a kenda for was before with northern the northern front basically was south lebanon, and theres account that doesn't want that. they wants us to focus on guzzle. so the ones who want to focus on doesn't want to prolong for the keeps moving forward, and that's within your heart. got his points and new ways to get some stuff out of the theaters to keep by themselves and for your very gods. they want that for they

actually want the reward because they that make is i pushing them to that. let me ask you to 64000000 dollar question before i let you go, which i think is important because a lot of people we hear the world talk about this all the time. i know that has bola is not really the army of 11 on their kind of separate their, their own institution in many ways. but many people would argue, and certainly that's what we hear in our country in washington. say that his bullet is simply an arm for iran, that they're nothing more than iranian soldiers dressed as his bowl and soldiers. how would you answer that? well, i know for it's like, because i've been covering them for the past 24 years. so i mean, i started covering levano since to 1000 and says if they just withdraw from most of the top level, and this is not true, actually. they gave them a arms. they give them for the funding, but they don't control the incentive decision making. so when, for example, here's what i dislike, this is the davis, who was the one by that said is, it's not up to the, the, the, the internet. so the,

so it's up with anybody else because they know that phone better than anybody else . when it comes to as an adult, the same thing. i was pretty house on the stand on the house and though the audio systems best way, but you know, the conditions haven't put them onto the system so far. and one over you off the, remember one thing that they have in these governments consecutive governments just like them. i know i did 96, i think so they, they have up with a different strategy that says are me, there's a sense of people. so they have up because the for the past feedback i think that that's part of the defense of some of them. so it's kind of like part of the system . and also they have the a basically, but it's a good way that's part of the government's part of the part number and part of the money support it has it as well. yeah. let's see what happens. i, i, we have only 30 seconds left, but would you dare say that this thing will escalate soon beyond what we've seen in the past? is that your fear or do you see it happening? no, i don't see anything. i covered this level of success. in addition, but it's would escalate, it went for long, i would say

a very hot summer going forward. get eyes on level. wow. well you're, you're, you're a delightful guest. you are so intelligent, you know, you're rich, your region so well you, you have unbelievable information that you've shared with us. things i've never heard before and it's a real delight to have you on as a guest. thank you so much. layla. appreciate your time. i it was a pleasure, thank you. and that's our show. and always remember to try and look for the crews outside your own box. just don't live in boxes, it's kind of why we dedicate our show. that's our mission moving forward. hopefully it will be yours. well, i'm rick sanchez. i will be looking for you right here under act. impact the

the, the for headline story this hour, at least 20 people are killed in that part of you. premium strikes on residential areas of the front line personally when it comes just hours after all the attack on the don't boss to be able to get out best for dead. and also ahead of ms. colette, when it comes to nuclear escalation. we never started this rhetoric, we simply said it should be taken more seriously and they immediately started talking about us brandishing nuclear weapons. are put in speak stuff, the flagship plenary session of the st. petersburg, international economic for stating the country fears clear of escalating any new to the river. it unfolds for a more serious dialogue with the, with the.