[000:00:00;00] the the and hello again, everybody. i'm rick sanchez. this is direct impact. and this is what we're going to be talking about. it can be the richest country and all of europe. i don't want to give that money and those assets to put into share with china. so very to know, forget democracy. he's talking about ukraine by the way, forget democracy. forget the destruction of ukraine for get the thousands of people who are dead or dying. senator lindsey graham explains the real reason for this country, america's involvement in ukraine. and the reason is that in that up the money public sanchez,

let's do it the, you know, it's always been known even by some of the friends that i have who went and fucked in iraq. and a lot of them came back and we became buddies. these are like, you know, who hob military guys, and they always said, you know what, the real reason that we went over there. the real reason that we were in the rock, it had to do with the fact that a rock was a country that was so which and resources and brimming with oil fields versus what the guys went over there. and father came back and told me as a reporter when we talk, or even just as friends. but now i asked myself, and i'm sure you probably asked yourselves to cause the same thing be said of our current involvement in ukraine. well, victor or bon seems to think so. i want you to listen to how boldly he pills it

well tells it like it is essentially calling out is nato member. colleagues, here's what he says, he says, and i'm gonna quote it right. he says, the fact that the western war mongering leaders wanted to feed russia in this war. and the reason is rather simple. he says, right there money. and now he's not making a lot of friends and nato as you might imagine for saying that they're mad at them for saying that. but, and then you're probably thinking, okay, so that's victor or by the leader of hungry. right. certainly no us leader would be willing to say something like that, right. no way somebody here in this country, not a congressman, a senator, maybe somebody in the white house. no, they would never say that, right. well, actually there is someone who actually does admitted here's south carolina senator lindsey graham accidentally telling the truth. well, being interviewed just the day before yesterday on the cbs. here it is there

sitting on tens of $12000.00 of critical minerals and, and you train, they could be the richest country and all of europe. i don't want to give that money and those assets to put into share with china. if we help, we train now, they can become the best business partner wherever dreamed of. so we're doing all of this because we want to create a business partnership with ukraine. so there you go. manila, we've got to keep this more going because we need those resources sometimes in life . the truth just accidentally flips out. you know what i mean? oh, rick, we are on our way this week with the accidental truth. mom's coming out of the nation's capital right. first with matt miller at the state department, now we hear senator graham, let's not forget though, rick, that he along with his senate soulmate and john mccain were part of the ukraine permian committee. now, i don't think that was their official name,

but my point is, they've been out this since around 2012 mccain didn't live long enough to see the fruits of his labor. realize the gram statements this week about ukraine's bath. natural resources are probably the most honest thing he has ever said. it's never know about freedom or just for c western values or whatever else they were parenting to manufacturer consent for uh, war to the american people. america never engages and that sort of thing for free or for, you know, out of the goodness of our hearts. there has to be something in it for us. we were in it for the natural resources. that's always been true in modern times recommend . that's why we keep so in friendly with saudi arabia but, but to say it out there. so loud and so blatantly is fascinating and now his words are being heard all over the world. speaking of words being heard all over the world, tucker carlson has just posted a fascinating interview on his website with thomas massey. i don't know if you've

seen that he is the us congressman who is from kentucky. massey is actually one of the few politicians who has decided that he is not going to take any money at all. as a matter of fact, from a pack the lobby that represents the interest of israel. and because of that, a pack has targeted him and attempted to pick him up. i mean, here he is describing to tucker how his colleagues in congress say they feel bad for him because of what the as really lobby is doing to him. here it is. why have republicans who come to me on the floor and say, i wish i could vote with you today? yours is the right so, but i would just take too much black back home and i have republicans who come to me and say that's wrong. what a pack is doing to you, let me talk to my a pack person. by the way, every party by me has an a pack person like that, meaning a tech person is like your babysitter. you're

a pack babysitter who is always talking to you for a pack. they're probably a constituent in your district. what they are, you know, firmly embedded in a pac it's, it's, it, have you seen in either country do anything like this, like russia. russia obviously determines the outcome of our elections. we keep hearing that. does anyone have put in guy that they talk to? not only do they not have a potent guy, but they tell they, they don't have a breton guy. they don't have an australian guy. then, you know, they don't have a germany dude. you know, i can't play the entire interview, but i got to tell you, his description of the total control on almost all congress. and he's in it. i mean, this guy's an inspired, right? that's applied by a pack is nothing short of queasy. a pack is by far the lobby that gives the

most amount of money to a members of the us congress. more than any us industry, for example. and, and, and what they're lobbying for has nothing to do with the united states of america. i mean, this is not, by the way, the majority of apex funding comes from extremely well things. zion is corporate investors. c. o is another heavy hitters. it does not come from, nor does it seem to represent the average american jewish citizen. although the corporate media, what have you think that's what that actually represents about. i think that's a really important point in this conversation and what came out as i, as i was watching that interview, that my friend tucker did with the congressman massey, manila, your tech. yeah. right. that was just nuts to here. i mean think about that. there are 435 members of the house. that means there's more than $400.00 lobbyist or

handlers. dedicated slowly to the issue of israel. now look, i don't, i don't know what the average jewish american thinks or, or you know, that they, they supports all the actions of a pack. but what i do know from having been a field reporter and having been assigned to the campaign trail during the 2016 elections, is that the average american isn't concerned with the interest of israel. they're interested in being able to afford rent to buy food for their families, put gas in their car, and just living in a peaceful community. they don't like war and generally they're just nice people out there. yes, america. i never asked their religious affiliation or their ethnic identities, but not once rec, not once on the trail in 2016 that i hear any random person that i talk to ever even bring up is real as an important issue to them. so it's really inexplicable to me that you know, they have the breath of reach that they do that a path does within our government. and that's the point they represent the foreign

policy of another country. well, sir, in this country, not so much of the opinions of the average american joe, which is no different than the average american kilburn, or the average american anything. as a matter of fact, which is why it shouldn't recognize the big cuban actually let, let's get to the next one before people just like jews and cubans, whatever. all right, seen was the media here in the united states is obsessed, isn't it? with finding racism in every story they report even where it doesn't seem to exist . i got a case of board for you. the story that is apparently captivated the internet. it's all over the place. go to youtube, you'll see it everywhere. it's a story about some dudes, a man who stops the school superintendent from shaking hands with his daughter during graduation. here it is. this video broadcast online and on tv shows. matthew eddie, pictured here in white push superintendent rainy briggs before briggs could shake

the hand of edy's daughter. use me. of course brenda eddie told investigators. he pushed the superintendent away from his daughter because he thought briggs treated her unfairly when she got in trouble at school, but some on line called the behavior. racist as brings is black and eddie is white . representative francesca, hong from madison, taking to x to right. no one should have to endure this type of gross and racist conduct. the district in a statement, not addressing the accusations of racism but saying it's quote, taking this incident very seriously and working closely with local law enforcement to ensure a thorough investigation. i cannot believe i just saw and it happens. so some people online say some people online, say manila wrote the bag so i'm done with it. so listen. even though they quote the father, i don't know if you could tell me the reports. let me take you back to what in case you missed that. so the father says he had

a beef with the superintendent for what apparently the superintendent did to his daughter at some point, right. they, they then suggest the assault was racist wise because some people online including some woman that no one's ever heard of said so now obviously the father is a jerk. right. and he's acting like a jerk, and he was way out of line to do what he did. but a z, a racist simply because he's white and the other guy is black. i mean, it seems to me what, that's what they're saying. and yes, our corporate media seems to be obsessed with this kind of thing. jumping to conclusions that aren't necessarily there might take what's yours? you know, i agree with that part i'm, i'm glad you brought this up, made that distinction. journalistically. that's important to underscore that there was actually more to the story more to that very well of what we saw, the white dad, black school faculty. but if you asked me, i still don't support what the dad did there. my age girls. rick, you have a daughter, teenage especially girls,

are already so embarrassed by their parents action. you can see in the girls face how mortified she was. then to find out that the story went viral and went national . i mean, the poor girl. she's now probably traumatized by the spectacle. she's now always going to be that girl. the damage is done though to her and her dad and the superintendent, whether or not racism was a component there. this was a moment for the girl to have a, a grown up moment in her life. if she chose to shake the superintendent's hand or not, that should've been her call and dad intervention. i say, rick, taking the agency away from new. absolutely. all right. this has nothing to do with that though. i mean, but that was a jerk. you shouldn't have done that. he shouldn't a hit the superintendent, the push the shouldn't have been. all of those are correct. so what does nothing to do if, what is the guy was white, what is the guy was asian? what is the guy was this right? and it wouldn't be a story. i mean the story you can't just say because one person has one color with another person is another color, right?

that's the reason for the confrontation because somebody online suggested it. that's crazy, right. and the moment we start doing the distinction. absolutely, and i'm glad we had, i think we talk about we can this like each other, we can dislike each other rec and be different colors but dislike each other for every reason other than the color. yeah. front door, but, but that's what they do, especially at the corporate level. if you watch cnn, or fox or unities, you'll never any of that. that's what you see all the time. unfortunate, rick, by the way, i went to college with a kid that was both cuban and jewish. we call them a jew bed. yeah. yeah. i've heard that before as well. thanks for letting us know. thanks manila. oh, is it always a fun conversation with you? by the way? this is smart when we come back. why did syria become a disaster that has become, i mean, think president obama and trump and bite, and what did they do? right? what did they do wrong and why? i want to know,

and i've got the perfect guess to ask all the questions for that. his name is could work all most young. he has a pod cast on youtube. it's called seriana analysis. it is both informative and very popular, and he's going to join us from berlin after the break. don't go to the, [000:00:00;00] the, at the end of the 18th century, great britain began to conquer and colonize australia. from the very beginning of the british penetration to the continent, natives were subjected to severe violence and deliberate extra patient. according

to modern historians, in the 1st 140 years, there were at least 270 massacres of local b. both any resistance to the british was answered with double cruelty. hundreds of natives were killed for the murder of one settler. indigenous australians were not considered complete people. no wild beast of the forest was ever hunted down with such unsparing perseverance as they are. men, women, and children are shot when ever they can be met with squatter. henry myrick wrote in a letter to his family in england, in $1846.00 plus strategy as bad as these rightly described as blood soaked and races. if at the beginning of colonization, there were one and a half 1000000 indigenous people living on the continent, then by the beginning of the 20th century, their number had degrees still 100000 people. despite the indisputable historical facts,

the problem of full recognition of the crimes of white australians against aborigines has not been resolved so far. the firewall go back on rick sanchez and joining us now to discuss as promises could work on them, i see on the is the host of seriana analysis and we thank you so much good board for taking time to joins. i thank you so much for having me. it's a pleasure. hey, let's start with how this all began. i guess what, between 20112014 all hell breaks loose after the error spring. and apparently people are angry, which is normal. people get angry and all kinds of countries including our own, but how does that turn into the capacitor fee that we then got? and why did this country the united states decide that it had to go all way and is actually if we follow the main same press and the politicians into united states,

of course they are involved in the ceiling conflict to bring democracy human rights act was able to advise our society is that so if you believe them, then this is your issue. however, there are major issues. why the united states wanted to replace president bush charlotte side or to conduct cobra to patients which could lead into a cool, similar to what happened in ukraine, for example, in 2014. the 1st reason is, of course, is right. see that is considered the quote unquote strategic depth of what the school, the access of resistance in west asia and this access includes the state and the state actors that switch from it on to live on, on syria, iraq and palestine. so syria played an instrumental in terms of the military support and intelligence supposed to palestinian antibodies aren't groups, those to support them in their arms struggled against these valuable condition forces. so this wasn't enough present for the americans to attempt to cool us out

and install a puppet government in the schools in order to end these flow off weapons. also training, any intelligence support to this non state actors fighting against these radio compassion forces. however, there was the other 2 main factors in this case, the fruits, the other fact it was, for example, the americans wanted to remove the emotions fleet from the media to any similar to what they attempted to do in the black sea. so if you remember what happened here, 2014, after the cool, one of the 1st steps that the new a gene that was installed by victoria, an old aunt and the other gangs in washington dc. they wanted to remove the restaurant sleep from the black seats, so similarly, they wanted to do it in syria to remove the restaurant fleet from the immediate area. and therefore the russians had been invested interest, for example, in capturing crime. yeah. and also capture the not touching about coming to see the foot for head, and that's how they preserved their, the, the, the, what,

what the say the, the fleet not only they may determine and, but also in the black sea. and this is very important, if we think about that, you are politically that the russians now have an a c access between the black sea and the media to opinion. and they can exert the power on the target is money. in my opinion, what was the just, this is very important because it's also related to russia. it's gas. so um the cut out is in 2008 offered a saw that they could extend gas pipelines from car testing to sort of the art. it'd be a jordan, syria, turkey, and some turkey tech. you would distribute these guys to europe. and so there isn't, was to end the project of north seemed want to know seem to, and a saw because he was a ally of the restaurant and he talked about it. and he said, no, he is not going to allow a cut all the guys pipelines to be extended to the territories of syria and, and therefore, you see the excitement of got taught in turkey and the moving us that's on power

after 2011 because they had a huge, impressive, oh, this mean it's the interest and see what happened after the 2020 to a conflict in ukraine. the americans couldn't. and this project to cut the pipeline . so they seated directly and they ended the not seem to pipelines by blowing it up, and then they blame it to a pro ukrainian group, which is in my opinion to say so fascinating. you have given us 3 interesting explanations for the true reason for the united states getting so heavily involved in syria. more than many other places where there were also aram springs. you mentioned, of course, is real wanting to fight back against russia's access there. and then of course, taking on a sod who they've never like to begin with, but, but let me back up a little bit and try and defend the country from which i speak right now. the

united states of america. their point of view is, okay, there's an error in the spring. the people that are in syria hate their president. they want democracy and we're going to go in and help them get that. you're saying that's a great story, but it's really a pretense for what they wanted to do is am i reading you correctly to exactly of course the president bush auto sides had the popularity in syria. he was popular among many sectors of this event society and he had also hatred. it's as normal, like in any other country. however, before that method inc and syria sought, that's true. what is called the civil society. so the americans, i provide that including my friends and colleagues in the university and in school that i know them with the technology is and with the tools necessary to training so that they know how to protest, how to gather in industries and how to fight against the government, however, during these times they will have lots of 2 things happening as well in the early days of 2011. they will also interest rates in the among the demo spacious. and

this is assuming that a study happened in ukraine when the snipers shot on both sides the security, the media trivia, also the protesters in order to create the cables. because when the chaos happens, you can break the stats of school and try to the for me, but they have misread it because syria has been built on a very strong security, a parenthesis, and also military power. therefore, the adair assumption that a sides relief following 2 months. this was a big miscalculation and the visual thinking. so when they realize they cannot remove us thoughts on power after 3 months, they start the army and the are the codes you how this in syria and this is got, we have an evidence for that because in 2012, the defense intelligence agency up the united states so meet at the airport to president obama before the president of the united states pending came that the driving force against besought in the country on the outside of the affiliated groups and c, knowingly put his signature on

a c. i a covert operation quoting best to convert and sent to seattle, syria in order to aren't as you had this in order to train them the so what you're saying is they are right in states was working side by side with kind of advices. so that's definitely the case in 2012. jackson, yvonne who is now the national security advisor, backed in he was the aid of yeah, hillary clinton, he sent an email to hillary clinton telling her that she was the secretary of state . she quoting him, i'll call you guys on our side in syria and the in the in 2021 jeffrey james jeffrey who was the that was the question of the invoice of syria. he had an interview and i'm literally quoting to him now he says that giovanni use an asset, giovanni is the lead it off of the guy that and see that. he said that a giovanni was an asset of the strategy and syria. i mean the entire operation in

turkey, which they had to mean digital probation rooms, one in turkey, one in jordan, and this operation, municipal probation rooms. they have a guided and instructed and health when supported and funded and armed, oldest you hardest in syria. but i like to put, for example, if you remember what happens now in ukraine, they say that they would lift the band on arming as well. but the young and it because they, they couldn't do it in the face a spot right, based off the words that they don't know. that's a, it's a wonderful, a comparative analysis that you're doing all of a sudden the united states and saying the odds of battalion who they've always called neo nazis are okay. just like they once said, well, isis. a i'll try it out. who are bad are ok because they're necessary. that's. i'm let me ask you about trump. trump did something interesting toward the end of administration that the hawks in the state department wanted him to continue to keep troops and go harder in syria. and he made

a decision or try it at least to get the troops out. tell me about that and what it means and what's the right and do you think from a deal political standpoint, he would make a better president the bite and in that sense, and i, i'm sorry to say we've got about a minute and a half left that he wanted to leave syria and he took the decision to leave cde about the there was an enormous pressure on him, especially if somebody is ready to slide these varieties and design is on the new york ones. and you see they were very, very determined that the americans sort of stay you there. because once the americans live, then south will take over the country again and who will establish order and step in at the end. that he will once again be able to actively participate in what's happening in the hands of the person. he is the president of the country. why are we telling the people who they should be led by when it's not our country? i'm like, crazy to ask that is because this is the condition of imperialism. the imperialists think that they have the model high ground and they are a they have the alternative to, to tell us who can, who i'm

a syrian. i was born in syria and i am entitled to elect my president or might be present at the about the americans do not believe in national silver entity. so once they disagree with the president, instead of compromising with him, they just try to pull this president and the americans did to city and many, many times since its independence. the 1st officer who in syria happens with the endorsement and the support of the american center c. r a. so they have been doing this business very long time because there's nothing new active for the syrians, but not the same inside of collecting memory. and that's why they have fought against this project. and the 4th that jim jim's project, but they didn't win yet. this long war against our medic waiting period is we've got to get you back. i need to continue this conversation because there, so we didn't talk about chemical weapons. we didn't talk about obama is actual role . we didn't talk about a lot of things that i wish we had an opportunity to continue talking about. but look, these kinds of conversations are important because we're trying to tell the stories that unfortunately much of the world never here's because much of the world gets

their news from very corporatized, western sources. someone like you can open our eyes to if nothing else, people might disagree with much of what you said, but it's a different perspective. and certainly from a syrian inside that we never get to hear. so mike, thanks to you for sharing that with us. and congratulations and good luck with your pod cast. thank you so much for having me a 2nd. it's pleasure. my pleasure. in fact, thank you so much. that's our show. remember, always what counts your own box when you're looking for truths, that's what we try to do. that's what back conversation just represented. many of the things you would never hear anywhere else. maybe outside your box,

they're box. i'm rick sanchez. it's what we do. and i see you next time the daily quarter board, and if it can, did you get the, excuse me, any of the, when go to come across, i'm 1 of january or people just federally. you said that you didn't have to select the ram and i mean if it isn't you, when you might be able to move my car for you. yeah . my yeah. can use because it shares bumper to you

on to to confirm seductive show for the group. here's a new book, this solution should be on the newest or exactly simply in our mind that was about, i know the big 3. i'm a size, but it's really the computer i'm with you sound as though it's and you just finished. right. and then, like i said,

the, the, the washington doesn't need a peaceful, your knowledge is over us. deep states on demanding, even little blogs. they need to flock with your team continental that a moscow slams. washington saying itself is policy is, but the whole of europe is a chaos. and that's us need to is chief lobbies for old members. space to make mandatory a payments to great disturbing images from gather where 38 people have been scale the news release twice of the past 24 hours distorts. local