no stage such a lawyer is merely an undertaker of the rules based on the even if it lives today, we're making another concrete real piece proposal. if and given in the wisdom capitals they also refuse it as before. and in the end, it is their business. their political and moral responsibility for the continuation of legit lot of put it in says piece as possible the ukraine, if it leaves done bad, separate was yeah, kind of constant rules out joining nato that's f e spoke for the leadership on roches foreign ministry. so if you want to negotiate a peaceful solution to the conflict in ukraine, the way to get there is to provide mentors support to ukraine. just to handle this ways hosted key summit for you. great need to us as the only way to resolve the conflict is to rob up, committed trace support with key avenue sanctions. it's not on china shut

off it guy the you way. me and for to years paging accuse as washington of abusing the punitive mazda and causing endless harm in the world. the, by this is our, the international, reaching you in line from my new center with mazda scope. i a michael now russia is ready to end the war with new trade, but peace folks can only begin if t every drove its forces from don't baz that pearl jack across on regions in the band and trying to join data. that was the message from vitamin, put in se, address the leadership of russia as foreign ministry to produce was able to deal with the machine to use it. in the meantime, the west ignores our interest. and at the same time, prohibiting kia from negotiating all the time, people critically calling us for some kind of negotiations. it just looks at the

1st they would 1st to give you have to come on to lift the ban on negotiating with russia. and secondly, we are ready to sit down at the negotiating table even tomorrow. there are legitimate authorities that even in accordance with the constitution. and that is someone to negotiate with police, we already have conditions for starting such a conversation. a simple ukrainian troops must be completely withdrawn from the desk and the guns people's republics. gibson ends up, but it was the regions as soon as keith declares that it is ready for such a decision and begins a real withdrawal of troops from these regions. and also officially notifies of the abandonment of plans to join nato. an order from our side will immediately follow to cease fire and begin negotiations. today we are making another concrete real piece proposal in kiff and into wisdom capitalism. they also refuse it as before, then in the end it is their business and their political and moral responsibility for the continuation of luncheon. and the conditions for starting negotiations will

be different. let me emphasize the main thing. the essence of our proposal is not some kind of temporary truth or suspension of fire, as for example, the west, once this is not about freezing the conflict, but about its final completion. and i will say again, as soon as give agrees to a similar course of events, propose today agrees to the complete withdrawal of its troops from the dpr and l. p r, and the photos yet and cas on regions. and really begins this process. we are ready to begin negotiations without delaying them. i repeat this is our principal position. neutral, non aligned nuclear, a free status of ukraine. it's the militarization and the notification. new territorial realities have been recognized. the status of crimea, sylvester poll donuts against people's republics. guess on ends up only a regions of subjects of the russian federation. naturally, this also presupposes the lifting of all the western sanctions against russia. i

believe that russia is offering an option that will make it possible to actually end the war in ukraine would cease putting the mean some of the means of lot of inputs. and also emphasize that the your ration secure with the system needs to be promoted. and that the time for broad discussion of biological and multilateral guarantees of collective security has come up. and it usually is in order to promote the idea of a ration security system, it is necessary to significantly intensify the dialogue process between multilateral organizations. already working in the region, i am referring primarily to the union state, the collective security treaty organization and the ration economic union. we believe that the time has come to begin abroad discussion of a new system of bilateral and multilateral guarantees of collective security and your ratio. ultimately, we believe that it is up to the countries and regional structures of your asia themselves to identify specific areas of corporation for doing security. the west

has not only undermine the military and political stability in the world through its actions with sanctions and trade. was it has also discredited and we can see market institutions 2 years ago, at the nato summit in 100 it was announced that the alliance would now deal with security issues, not only in the euro atlantic region, but also in the asia pacific region. and they say that they cannot do without them, they're either obviously behind this is an attempt to increase pressure on those countries in the region whose development they have decided to restrain. as we know, one of the 1st places on this list is our country pressure. ultimately, the goal is um, an arrogance of western countries have led to the current, extremely dangerous state of affairs. we have come unacceptably close to a point of no return calls for us to, to the defeat of russia, which possesses the world's largest austin, of nuclear weapons, demonstrate the brass adventure and of wisdom politicians. they either do not understand the scale of the threat. they themselves suppose or are simply obsessed

with their own belief in that infinity and exceptionalism. reason you're about to get more on this. so we're not joined by correspondent martin. uncle, sort of america is, is put in attempting to drive a wedge between europe and the united states here. hi, mike. well, what am i personally looking for a fair model, one that works to benefit of everyone and not at the expense of another country, which is why he believes that the way forward is good that you've raised in the model of security. because clearly what would seem is not the euro atlantic model of security is only serve in the very few and not even the very few. we'll see you later is working. one would argue towards their benefit, but at the same time or student themselves in the quote because they are working to please their faults, their big brother, if you will, boss into the end very frequently. they do this at the expense of their own citizens. for example, with the decisions that they make,

they seem to sales to understand the consequences of their actions. all they refuse to do it because of what matters most is not their citizens based on what they do. watch of washington boards. we're seeing your peers up, for example, paying for more expensive gas recalls. will it be nice to build more weapons supply, more weapons into conflict, produce, produce and spend more. let's hear some more. personally, you. the danger to europe does not come from russia. the main threat to your opinions is the critical and ever increasing homeless total dependence on the united states and the military, political, technological, ideological, and information spheres. europe is increasingly being pushed through the fringes of global economic development. it is being plunged into the chaos of migration and other acute problems it is being deprived of its international subject, vicki and cultural identity. sometimes it seems that the ruling european politicians and representatives of the european bureaucracy, a more afraid of falling into washington's dis, favor of losing the trust of their own people,

their own citizens. the recent election for the european parliament shows this european politicians in just their own humiliation, boyishness, and scandals with surveillance of european leaders. and the us simply uses them in its own interests. having said, all this, russia is willing to engage with any configure appeared or knows when it comes to this you raised in a security model. and of course, for some european countries, i guess that will have to wait until it gets really bad before realizing that the only option that is there and serves to the interest of every party involved is that you raise in model of security. all right, marina talked to us about what was said about multiply of the, of course, this is all, simon from multiple are, etc. russia has been on the past on this multi polar passport for some time now. and if there is, starts with a conflict in ukraine,

flattereth with an asset this time and time again. time is, are changing, the power dynamics in the world are changing and it's happening organically. of course, the conflict the brain has had an effect, but things are moving forwards. and of course we're seeing that washington is refusing to let go of attaching monique. and that is why there is a need for more organizations. for example, rick switch, we're seeing that as growing as other countries and some of the of russia. of course, there are many countries that want to make sure that there are no applied to washington leads or whatever they want because they're seen that's what will happen in case that don't agree with washington, is that there will be slots will sanction. so they're not solved, right? so this is all about sovereignty and moving forward, that needs to be more organizations like bricks and watermark. we did say that the foreign ministry needs to work on making sure that they expand, breaks the work on attracting more partnerships of working on current relationship, making them stronger and more fruitful. you see me to me it's the world is

changing rapidly. more and more nations are striving to strengthen the sovereignty, self sufficiency, national and cultural identity. the countries of the global south and the east are coming to the forefront and the role of africa and latin america. is growing since soviet times we have always talked about the importance of these regions of the world. but today the dynamics are completely different. it's getting more noticeable. and the pace of transformation in eurasia has also accelerated markedly . where a number of large scale integration projects are being actively implemented. it is on the basis of the new political and economic reality that the contours of a multi polar and multi lateral world order are being formed today. such an image of the future is in tune with the aspirations of the absolute majority of countries in the world. and we see this among other things, or by the growing interest in the work of such a universal association as the brakes based on the special culture of trusting dialog, silver, and the quality of participants and respect for each other. in general, i believe that the potential of the brakes will allow it to eventually become one

of the core regulatory institutions of the multiple world order. and this is how it's moving forward. and that's why the focus right now is on this ration model of security and building new partnerships with seeing a lot of improvements. uh the last year. he's definitely intensified meetings with different countries from what we've seen them even today. we've heard from lot of or if we can set up a slot, for example, the emphasis was there were 2 meetings per year. whether you organizations with nato as well. for right now, the focus is switching and it's time to make annual meetings with different organizations and different countries. or i'm wiring i talking about need to make cause to bring us up to speed. what he's also said about the roles of nato. the yes hold, this was a roughly 2 hour speech. i'm vladimir preaching. once again to this, from the very, very beginning of how we got to where we got to now in terms of the conflict,

the new grades and he said that the end of the 20th century was really an opportunity for a new era. but the west apparently didn't take it. we saw that nato, despite all the promises they will continue to expand them eastward. that's trying to extract even by force, as we've seen, is sometimes tried to attract the rushes neighbors. and it's as we've seen, it failed. but this has shown that it's an inside russia campaign that's continued the cold war ended only for russia. it seems that the united states continue with their expansion this views. and this is something that we're seeing that now, and they don't as referred from vladimir preaching, expanding into the asia pacific. so this is something that is a very warrior so we can them great if the events in ukraine are a direct result of a global and european development of the late 20th until the 21st century, an aggressive calculator, and absolutely adventurous policy that the west has pursued and is pursuing all

these years long before the special military operation began. by implementing this strategy, wisdom countries have taken a line on the absorption and military political development of territories close to russia. and there were 5, and now there are 6 waves of nato expansion. they tried to turn your brain into the spring board to make it empty russian feet in order to achieve these goals. money and resources were invested politicians and entire parties were more history in educational programs with rewritten, neo nazis and other radical groups were supported and developing. they did everything to undermine the ties between ukraine and russia to separate and could our people's, against each other, to southeast of ukraine territories that were part of the great historical russia for centuries. oppose that policy brazenly and unceremoniously. and once again, we heard about all the chances that russia gates the result, this conflict and how all the went all taken by the west. because it seems that the west is more interested in resolving that because of this part of a bigger agenda. and of course, we have this upcoming peace conference,

the lensky so called peace conference in switzerland, where russell was not invited them government preaching such, just like all other leaders have mentioned by the way that piece cannot be attainable achievable without russia being involved. and also have a lot of everything said that it's incredible how you have washington from one side . how does the lensky, for example, notice in the goals shave with russia? and at the same time, the telling brush off that you need to negotiate a lot of effort to start that this is pretty much the audit is really surprising. i'm telling you as even the united states president will be there. all right, we have to leave it here. now might of course our of a hard to correspond and thank you for bringing us up to speed on this. now just to had it, but the summit in switzerland to focus on the great and conflict job i didn't, is calling for an escalation by redirecting, who spends by keywords, forces may fire long range weapons into russia. about 2 weeks ago you changed

course to allow ukraine to fire us weapons into russia, given the reported successes, would you consider further expanding the parameters on us weapons into russia? even despite your concerns about escalation is clear that the near broad media and just across the line of a border with russia and ukraine, that it makes a lot of sense for ukraine to be able to take out or combat what is coming across that board. in terms of long, long range weapons, longer range weapons into the interior of russia, to as the g 7 lead as a 3 on a plan to stand $50000000000.00 from c's russian assets to your tray, washington and key of sign the security deal for the next 10 years, it foresees the us supply afraid with weaponry and the other equipment, as well as providing training to boost keeps forces. washington is also to consider more ways to use confiscated ross and assets to support your trade. the u. s. is

also reaffirmed to that ukraine will have a future in nature. now this all comes as switzerland is about to host the so called the summit for the ukraine conflict of the conference and conference is intended to create a proposal based on positions endorsed by the lansky about 90 countries of confirm that will attend. and that's out of $160.00 that were invited. roger has not been allowed to participate. and that begs the question, is this some, it's really about piece. but while the head of major says that resolving the conflict may only be possible by all means. yes. so if you want to negotiate a peaceful solution to the conflict in ukraine, that's ensures that your team can continue. so democratic a southern nation in europe, the way to get there is to provide mentors support to ukraine. my proposal and

that's not yet agreed among allies, is that we should agree a minimum of $40000000000.00 per year. but the cost is also at least sustained the level of mentor support we have provided so far. to me right here in the studio of article fernandez, brazilians colored and political analysts. marketers nice to have you. me right here. thanks for having me here. my aid grade now president puts in mid is strong speech earlier on to the offer. shows that before and ministry and part of what he said is that russia is offering another piece deal to the west, west in ukraine, the of the one to accept this offer. this is the time. if they don't accept this offer, then all the bloodshed in the front lines will be on them. what do you make of this? well, 1st of all, i think it's a very good each different present. let me put in and actually i think this adds to another very important initiative a couple of days

a few days ago from brazil in china. and they destroyed the statement, also calling for a real peace conference because both president china said no way you're going to go to sweets and then with the russian doesn't make any sense. i mean, it's just common sense, right? but let's see, because the problem right now is that nato has a few challenges. first of all, i paid some of their leaders that calling this like the losers conference, right? did you 7 now because some of the lead this was just humiliated, defeated. uh, in, in the elections for the parliament, european parliament like like sure it's like my crown snack is already about to leave a new way. so i think this is the 1st thing. second thing is that i don't know if you saw, but last week there was a survey published by the uh, the agent to for um, global affairs. its a big survey, the deed in your west friends, germany and u. k. and the vast majority of the people in this full countries,

they want this stop war. now they want a solution for this war. so again, while we are see, is this split between the will of the majority of the people and that will of have for those and leaders that of course are there to, to another interest that is not specifically the, the citizens of interest. yeah, exactly, but the fun days, most of the citizens, that's why they has been demonstrations across parts of the western world, saying i'm voicing out that we don't want war. stop this right now. all right, no one other thing that was highlighted i put in was the 5, but the landscape is no longer the legit to meet the president as it is right now because he canceled the elections. and so one, what do you make of that? the west doesn't seem to see that way. oh, what does it call, talk about democracy? i mean, we know that when west western countries talk about democracy it's,

it's bullshit. is just propagating that because i mean how many groups the thoughts already united states or other countries in the west, they already organized support and even intervene. and in many countries in the pro, hold historically in the global south the last years. so we know that i remember when last year in the german 4 ministry annalynn, uh 180 degrees bare balk. when she was asked about this. oh, but looks like your voters are calling for a peaceful solution. she said, we don't, we don't care about what the seats is, are saying we are going to support ukraine. so i mean, it's clear how, how the west moves and double sanders all the time. and more and more people in the world are realizes that to me, now it puts it and it said that's the, the war will end on russia is ready to end this conflict right now. if the

ukraine we draws its uh, soldiers from the front lines and also commit to the fact that there would never be a part of nature. what do you make of that? well, it's hard that that would be the ideal solution. but at this point, what i'm afraid is that, i mean, you know, how much money natal already put in this war. there is also a very recent article in the council for an relations scene. that is more than $300000000000.00 already. of course, the vast majority of this money just go straight to the u. s. o industry. exactly. but, but guess what, mike, think about this is insane. like, you know, b, r i, the chinese belt enrolled in the ship. i mean, they promoted resolution infrastructure in africa, e, latin american, our continental, ours, and also a nation. the whole project in 10 years, mobilize one, treating doctor's of the needle. mean, in 2 years,

they already spent almost a 3rd of the, a ride for what, for hundreds of thousands of, of, of great and people killed. also, russians, i mean the economy of europe now is, is, is devastated germany like i just saw a new that last year, more than 5000 companies in germany went bankrupt. so this is what i mean. this is what they are uh create, and there's no, they're not creating, not only did not create alternatives to the global self, but they are not create alternatives to their own countries. germany is about to collapse economically. so what's the point? exactly? what's the point? all right, now, uh the platinum to put it in is also putting up putting for the proposal for a dialogue on multi logical and bilateral talks on collective security for your asian. what's your take on that? well that's, that's interesting because coming back to the survey of the global affairs

institute for global affairs, one of the questions was for the pins. like, do you think that us should be the main defender of your europe and like 90 something percent of people say no way europe should be responsible for its own defense. of course, i think what we're seeing now and it may be maybe this is what present putting is also trying to establish this dialogue. sort of like an edge between european countries and us, which is something similar that presence you didn't think is also trying to do is to explore this contradiction because again, the results of the european parliament elections gives us a sign that people are not happy with that and of course, i mean if you ask for the business people in germany that are suffering losses could not make losses, they are probably not happy as well. so i think this is probably what's present,

which is trying to establish the dialogue. because i mean, if, if us keep leading, are these the sprays war, this would be not only bad for russia for the great, but this is the only are also very bad for you are exactly. i remember the, the formation of the united nations. when the say or countryside equal come less talk, let the dialogue diplomacy and or that's what happens to the issue of diplomacy dialogue sitting on the table between warring factions and this caustic. but anyway, let's come back to the issues gap. now we're seeing that there's a g 7 summit, you know, that, that held in easily and a new wave assumptions have been, you know, slapped again on russia. russia, by the ways, the most sanctioned country in the world history in the history of the well. but russia has been able to stand its ground, and it's,

it is within the frame of assumptions that russia overtook germany as the biggest economy in europe. we have seen that russia is also standing his ground on all fronts. but what do you make when it comes to how russia is good to sustain itself and get out of this? do you see this new sanctions having any impact on russia? oh, my goodness, i still didn't. didn't see the details of this new round of sanctions. i think is going to be published soon, but the thing again, i'm, you just said, i mean it's not only that russia over to germany, but russia just over to japan, also according to the world bank and became the 4th largest digit b in p, p. and, and power part of the and for chase, so i mean, 16000 sanctions more than 60000 stations already. and, and russia, russia's economy. i mean, also the i m f, a forecast for this year, for uh,

for russia. more than doubled from one point, something to almost 3 percent. so again, what's the point of distinction is i don't think it's working. i think it's working against germany. i think it's working against frost. so, i mean, the problem with the western leaders is that they seem that they don't, they don't learn with history. neither the long time history with napoleon or hitler, when they tried to evade rush ended with just smashed. neither they'd learnt with a short term history about the sanctions because it's definitely not working. but the us, you'll see the sanctions backfiling against the west sometime because upon days that the russia this, this, the moscow stock exchange has ended the use of the dollar in euro and all of that. and if i put you in, what say that well, the west is hurting its own self by functioning countries not to use the dollar the use. do you see this by firing against the west and along to yeah, this,

this is happening again with, i mean, just see the results of germany and in the last couple of years. but also this is making russia to establish new partnerships, especially of course, with china. so there's a huge potential for this partnership because of course, economies are complaining. terry, china has a lot of investments that already are not going to us and europe anymore. some part of these investments are going to be directed to russia, and of course the russians also establish a new new partnership with global soft global southwick's out. and. and so, just for you, since like a few days ago, did you establish a very interesting uh, project for a solar power plant in molly, as well as recently with working a fast so choose stablish a nuclear power plant. so this is also important investments for the russian economy, but most of all, it's super important to the people who molly and booking a fast. and i get a back to your point. so if you are right now,

you are in malia and working a fast, so you look at to nato, you look at the russian, china, i mean, for your allies who are your friends and, and is clear more and more to the countries that will solve that again, natal, us, us, europe, they are not creating alternatives to our people, to our countries. and of course, this is for them. i don't think this has a good future for then in terms of they are on gemini over over the world, right? we'll have to leave it here now marco fernandez. thank you so much for your insights every time. thank you. thank you. my great and all right. see you soon. all right, now the us has expanded its anti russians functions, pocketing entities and sinus of africa. you. ready you had to key that washington insist are linked to moscow. china has condemned the mattress as the head, demonic abuse of power bends to preserve you as dominance to the detriment of other

nations. may phone you from the us has been pouring weapons and ammunition into ukraine. well, also shifting the blame for undermining peace and dragging other countries into the crisis. it has even been using the crisis as an opportunity to impose sanctions and suppress other countries that is extremely scheming, hypocritical, and hedge a monic the us is abusing as unilateral sanctions around the world, causing endless harm. seriously, undermining the sovereignty and security of other countries causing humanitarian tragedies and undermining the stability of production and supply chains. now we spoke with 5 on the cemetery, how political analyst on co founder, or they didn't tell our institute in indonesia. and he said that the new us function package simply does not make any sense us, as i said, they already already mentioned that they are putting 300 individuals problems over

the countries into it. there's a sort of backlist last, i think it is a 5 point less, i guess they will just find that the guy had to do their intended business in himself. if anything does sanctions, if uh, uh, do you guys have mistakes and especially that from the advisory themself wants to expand the thinking back and stood china and then trying to a little bit hurting the chinese economy. because as we all know, and china recently adjusting their economy uh, activities by driving up more into the domestic consumption rather than export. we've don't actually into that, you know, a deal. but if you got squared in these, right, and then uh, yeah, again, it is really pipe less if uh, the binding of the administration, which they already know they, they only have like a couple of minds.