and the possible to bring all the parties together, and this is how mas ready to be part of this government. i don't think we're talking about the government to you. we're talking about our unified leadership. how much is it 80, to enter the piano as well as you had and that to me is that on groups will be inside the piano and then it's executive committee has to be restructured to include everybody. when we come to the government, how much is not so interested in beings or government in guys or being inside the government? that is not the issue. but the issue is that any government has to be accepted by one party so that it's kind of work on function. and so that it can be supported with cooperation. but i'm all of the parties. but the main thing here is to have identified national leadership. i only 5 nationally need to ship that would be responsible for political decisions or how do we organize that works that are good and i on the 5, my know so that no particular party was having one of the needs are getting you

guys are not endorsed by and cannot anywhere the palestinian people that all the phones that we have had before and what that we have to the store. that's no single part of the palestine has, would have absolute majority if we had connections and that's in my opinion, is very healthy. sorry. because it means in any future interactions, we would have to uh, not understood, the democratic system, where the product is, have to know how to create conditions. but at this moment we are facing the national crisis. we are facing catastrophe. we are facing genocide and collective punishment and an active ethnic cleansing by is there is, there is no time. but other than this one to create a unified palistine in front and i own a 5, but just in and do the chip. if there's a through responsibility or 4 liters, if they want to maintain the respect of their own people listing and people for life, we have to living here. now, thank you so much. and most of the stuff all about who is the general secretary of

the policy and national initiative. we appreciate your insight. thank you. but that's the update this our most story is coming your way up the top of the r. i see that again of a more than 200 years before moscow was the seat of power. saint petersburg was larissa, london, the capital of the russian empire. and it was here that the roman uh, family, established a tradition of luxury high end items like imperial porcelain and establish the entire body of rick sanchez. this is direct impact. and this is what we are going

to be talking about from us has responded to the latest proposal for a hostage and sees fire deal and from us has rejected it. it's how boss has not rejected it. but he said that, why did he say that? because he thinks that whatever is real, says must be the truth. probably state department to, i'm a said just let's do it the, you know, if you ever wanted proof of what i always say about the western media, specifically the corporate media in the united states. i want you to watch this clip again, okay, this clip of jake tapper to see reports flat out that how miles has just re directed the peace proposal that was offered to that. so why does he say

that? why does he say, why does jake tapper just call me or and say that i'm off said no to the peace proposal because that's what the state department, and that's what the is really government has pulled out. even though it may not be true. all right, here we go. watch what happens from us has responded to the latest proposal for a hostage and cease fire deal and from us has rejected it to them. political and foreign policy analyst, but rock ravine is breaking us a did come osbourne active. any explanation for its rejection. hi, jake, so 1st, come us did not say that it rejected the di mazda did not say he goes on to explain, by the way, that his next words, if we had continued to, to watch it. and you can find that yourself, it's on youtube. he says, how mazda did not say they rejected the deal. jake, israel says how mos rejected the deal. i mean, look it up. and so he corrected them right there on the air. oops,

o. i told my viewers a lie, you know, and again, i'm not trying to make fun of jake tapper for making a mistake. we all make mistakes, including me. i make more mistakes than most people asked my wife as well. however, i do believe that the jig tappers, of the world in the western media. and the point i'm trying to make here is that they automatically default to the establishment position without asking, well, wait a minute. is this true? so if the state department puts it out, they just report it as gospel. you know, china bad rush about it wrong, bad, whatever, whatever they want you to say you just reported. and a more often than not, it's the establishment positions, sometimes vanilla that they've pulled out without even knowing that they're doing so because i think it's, it's almost like a like, like an in green response and them, it's, it's, it's, it's a cycle sematic response. and i think that's what we saw with jake tapper there.

you're great, you know, it's, i, it's probably a little bit of a knee jerk reaction rick, but at this point, it's hard to tell if it's a flood or deliberate delivery of fake news. i mean, in my opinion, you know, i see this is parenting the, the state department to sort of perpetuate the notion that, how moss is this, is the actual on youtube, inside of tacitly it housing, create this false image that the israel, these are the reasonable guys in this fight, you know, at this point, it's no wonder that the worship at cnn is so low. email number 3 in april ratings. um it was box m s, and be cnn. cnn. viewers can't rely on what they say. i'll be at some viewers do blindly, you know, believe, but that's a small contingent and they are rapidly fading into yesteryear. that's why alternative media independent media are exploding with clicks. i mean,

are the argue argument becomes read that they say, oh, well people are just cutting the court. it's not even just that because seen and tried to go with the streaming platform and it failed miserably if we recall. and they still have the ability to be able to reach a very sizable audience over the age of 55 because they depend on them for that. and apparently because they are in cahoots as we like to say, with google and all the other tech companies. mm. hm, so if jake tapper puts out a segment, everybody sees it because they make sure it's on youtube. whereas if you, when i put out a segment, it gets buried by the technology. so in that sense, they still get the word out, even though half the crap they're saying is wrong. all right, i've got another one for you, right? i've got another video i have to show you that is a bit of a media, a game changer for ukraine's on elected president of war and beggary. those are the

words, the words that are being used by almost half of the members of the german parliament who bowed. president zalinski, i know he's not elected, but they still call them president what he showed up to speak. this is how the times of india described it in their video. by the way, here it is. there it is right there. look at that split screen. that's him walking in with a couple of people cheering those empty blue seats. you see right there are where the german m p is what upsets, but they decided to instead board cod zalinski is page and many of them put out a statement saying that a guy dressed in camouflage who isn't even elected should not be honored at the german boot and his dog. apparently they pointed out that russia is ready to negotiate an end to this fighting, but zalinski is not because instead, he's willing to risk their words. he's willing to risk nuclear war. they say, to achieve his goals, are you surprised? but by this reaction by the german m p's, i was manila no, actually not at all,

rick. and we need to point out zaleski wasn't exactly wearing tam o this time. he had a black shirt and i think it had a color. so that's, you know, a step up, he's dressing up as okay, so, so look at the, the in the party in germany was a big winner and last week's annual elections. right. and it has a sizable group in the, the german buddhist jobs. so 1st, let's point out that the a f the, the alternative for deutschland i'm, yeah, there are among one of the newer major parties in the buddha side. and it's not exactly far right. not in the way that we think of it here in america as far, right? they're not white supremacist or walk, you know, they're not walking with torches. they're not highlighting or any of that. they're actually a coalition of people from varying backgrounds, even very political believes, who sort of have this germany 1st platform, if you will. i have a source close to the f

b who tells me that the party actually has the most views as senior members. so it's a call them far right, white nationalist is, is really a bridge too far. but if these guys who are calling for peace between ukraine and russia and they're sick and tired of seeing zelinski manipulate olaf schultz, you know, they're spineless, chancellor, and they keep it. and they say that this guy is the lensky keeps taking their tax dollars abroad to fight what they knew as a proxy war by the americans. and the app is angry about the cost of energy, the cost of gas. they've got a full price at all that they use a lift gate as a drain on their, on their economy. it would be surprising for more people to not be saying this. i mean, i don't understand where, where we're shocked or i'm saying i was surprised to see this because here in the united states, you probably couldn't get 5 people and congress to stand up and do what all of those people who are in these, in germany did there's no way in the world that we would get that kind of, uh,

off that type of optics here, the united states. and yet look, we're, we're set, we're seeing it in germany. and maybe it's the beginning of a common sense of movement if you will. all right. yet another example of a show of defiance. you know, i love defiance. i'm a big fan of devices. uh, this is an anti war activist. somehow you can see in this video, he gets into a bite and is that a president binding to that? and let me tell you that's hard to do these days. present a bite and these days is protected. show much. nobody can get near them. they don't want people around them, they don't want reporters to ask questions. they don't, they don't want anything to go out of sorts for this guy. so they protect him. well, this guy got it and somehow i don't know. maybe he paid to pretended to be a donor because all the people at this gathering, providing they've all been very carefully selected. this guy shows up the yellows or the president right to his face. the cause of genocide, jo,

accuse them of killing thousands of children. it's kind of hard to hear, so i'm gonna play twice for you here it is of the. 6 the, the. 6 the for more years i'm looking to buy, been a big again, this guy last 4 or 4 years. but anyway, i, i gross. what i find fascinating is how this audience and i know they're very handpicked democratic party law. busy lives but still, i mean, there boeing this guy who's essentially telling the truth. i mean, love it or hate it is what he's saying is true. the united states was involved in the death of these 15000 children in gaza. and this guy saying it. and these guys

instead are bullying them down. nobody has a right to hear your message. sure. get the hell out of here. i don't know. it's troubling manila for more years. i don't know if he's got 4 more minutes. rec, um, i don't get what the biden supporters are. bullying? exactly. i mean, are there blues to be understood as pro genocide cheers. i'm not sure the protest or i say he got it right. he has every right to tell his elective leaders, whoever they might be, in this case, post himself, what he really thinks and expresses disappointment of the officials, actions. but notice one thing about the majority of those in attendance, bullying. this man read. it's a see of elderly people and yeah, he of white and gray hairs. that's who supports biden and wants those 4 more years . as you know, they counter chanted, but by the looks of it, right, i really, really don't think neither. they, nor biden have 4 more years, sorry,

but not sorry. yeah. and, and yet were told that he doesn't look good in public, but trust me, behind the scenes. he's filled with vin, many bigger and strange. but why don't kind of bring that guy out? that's like, oh okay. the one we don't see is the incredible one. yeah. got it. sure. uh huh. taking notes over here. you're fantastic partner. i love talking to you. i appreciate it. have a great weekend, correct. by the way, i do, i do have one more point the and i think this is important. and by for it before i go to the break, i was just thinking that i should probably say there's apparently 2 bricks. nations are now quietly putting together the framework for a piece deal to settle the ukraine issue once and for all and interesting. it's china and brazil. china and brazil have come together. they're leading and the talks to that are according to both countries. they've been getting a lot of surprise, a surprising amount of support from many other countries you are calling and saying,

we want to be a part of this. we want to make it work, you know, and, and to that i say fingers crossed for piece. and when we come back, my next guest is written a very popular book that explains all 500 years western had gemini, is ending. there it is. that's the book. so now it says we're in this transition period where the world is an illegal vacuum in which the conflicting sides are competing to define the future order of our world. who is this man? there is you're looking at a, let's go and diesel. he's a professor, he's an officer, and the book of that i just described is his. it's called the ukraine. busy or, and the, your region where a order you should read it. he's next, he's going to talk to us. don't go away, stare right there. the take a fresh look around his life. kaleidoscopic isn't just

a shifted reality distortion by power type vision, with no real opinions pictures, design to simplify. it will confuse really once a better wills, and is it just because it shows you fractured images, present it is, but can you see through their illusion going underground? can the water bag i'm rick sanchez here is professor glen decent. you wrote a book once again, the book is called that you create more and then your asian world order. he's good enough to join us now. i've been looking forward to having this conversation. professor, thanks so much for joining us there. oh, thanks for holding. you know, so i, i'm fascinated 1st speaking just in general terms, not about specifics of anything going on in the world. the idea that you present it

for 500 years. we've had this western control which is somewhat colonial lives of the world. and you're saying we happen to be living in a period right now where that is transitioning out. is that correct? yes, that's correct. so we have various kinds of world orders, but the most recent one was the one that came into being after the cold war, when to a solar one, a super power left in which we're the unit puller world order, one central power. and this one central power and effectively a claim, the rights to represent universal values. so we'd like a global impression of doctor in were us and the collective west can intervene anywhere in the world is fits deals, liberal democratic values are threatened. and so we have this order for 30 years, but, but small, it coming to an end. but and, and by the way, to take it back even just a little bit further, i'm thinking, well,

the dutch did it in africa, the british did it in, uh, you know, the caribbean and other parts of the world. the spanish didn't in, in my country. and my part of the world in latin america. so it wasn't just what happened post world war 2, where the united states was the big, tough guy, even before the united states, there was all these other powers were colonial lives in the world, correct? right. the way of course, and the well, this is supposed to be quite unique about the world order. the most of the rules which emerged were actually based on it was considered to be a european order. so the idea on sovereign equality, but his sovereignty for all the states was then reserved for the europeans. it was uh, there were no christian lights, civilized people who it was considered. so the rest of the world didn't. it wasn't seem to qualify for the same amount of sovereignty. now, you know, we can forward is set to the present time and we, we, we speak the same way i'm of liberal democracy is versus so far

a terran states. so let's have a liberal democracies through the joyful sovereignty and the, the rest of the system should have limited. so it's, it's always been based on a similar pattern, not least about that. you're correct, the colonialism, all of this kind of happened under the same format. the rules are so, so when, when do we see this real transition starting to take cold? because i could argue that, well, you know, we had pushed back in, in the, we've gone the pushing, you know, the british out of there. so wasn't that the beginning of it knock inside other examples and perhaps you know, indonesia, for example, you see similar situations. what are you saying? we're more in the midst of it now than we were before or ever before. and if so, tell me why a well, over the past 500 years, so we have various different kinds of order. so obviously there's always been some

states or peoples who have pushed against the dominant forces. hm. about what is the quite unique is because, and in the beginning of the 16 century, that is really when the european powers began to control over the world sees. and this is when a lot of the dominance began as well. now, well, what i'm arguing is quite different. this time we have multiple arthur before monday was the concentration of power within the virus western states. so you'll be in the united states. what's quite unique now is that it will, the leading our in the world today is becoming out of china. and also you having this new sense of power bit to india as well. now obviously, and i've tried to assist the british rule, but the never been considered one of the key poles of power in the international system. and this is really what the world orders about is about the distribution of power. and also the, the, the legitimacy for the rules much to reflect, i would almost stick to the, what's unique about this moment is, yeah,

and i'm sure you agree. i was right. there was a time when the indians kicked the british out. and that was fascinating that they would do it, but it was kind of a, it was a solo player at the time. they are what we have is india is still pushing its strength very successful economically. and then you'll have rush up pushing it strength, very successful, it may terribly. then you have china pushing, it's showing it's, it's, it's strength as well. a ron as well of south africa. there's all these countries that are coming together, whatever you want to call them bricks global south. and they really kind of created create this force that's making a difference. i think your point becomes most clear when we think of this, this 2nd submarine that maybe just arrived in nevada, where russia is, say, a, to the united states, 90 miles off of its coast. you're going to bomb us. you know what? we have the ability to hurt you to we don't want to,

but you can't just continue to push us the way you've been pushing us. and that may be, is a freeze moment of the conceptualize thought that you create in this book. that, that you written, which people are, are, are, are, are so fond of a. yeah, because well, they are still operates under the unit fuller world order. wherever it seems, there's only one central power. now this manifesto itself and 2 sets, a rule says, one set of rules for the united states, another for the rest. so the us would see itself as having having the project into, for example, as a, as a well established middleton alliances on the border of russia. and this is this a small, problematic, but of course russia doesn't have the same permission. i mean, mexico doesn't have the right to join the russian or chinese the line. so, so this is the, essentially, the system that the united states have been living on when under which it claims one set of rules for itself, which is also referred to as the rules measuring national order. meanwhile, what we see now is a multiple or system emerging,

and this is the rules to refer to what i'm nauseous pushing through saying, no, this is a system based on solving the call to. if you claim are right, we will do it too. so they're doing a show for us, what they're saying, if you're going to set up your military in, in ukraine, then we have the right to do the same in cuba or venezuela or close to a board as effectively the same rules should apply for both sides so this is a and us the distribution of power shifts and you have new sense of the power. they also then contesting this whole idea of the united states claims. this is special rights or privileges and international system to act in a way which others are not permitted to so. so if we're in this transition period right now, when is the back part of the transition period start or are we already in it? and let me continue this question by saying, is that what we're seeing in, for example, the case of gaza where it seems the whole world is looking at israel and saying,

who the hell do you think you are to be doing this? and israel is saying we can do whatever we want because we've got the united states support. but at some point, you have to think that there's going to be so much pushback that it's not going to be good for is real and not good for the united states. when does that happen? is it already happening? what's your view as well? i think that's the vacuum we're currently in and then the are correct. the reason why it hasn't been any significant, significant, the advances in peace is because it's been under us such a moment to you at the israel isn't really how to make any significant compromises with others who could always get its way simply because the united states also is behind it. now what you're seeing is this shift going now this new centers of power, israel's neighbor, so much stronger. a lot of it's a allies begin to take off a step back. the other great powers which are emerging, beatrice,

shut china. they're then less sympathetic towards the israel in terms of allowing it to do whatever it wants. so you see now the world effectively being pushed into 2 directions. and this is why in this shift the world order. israel is under great pressure because the new unit, pullover allergic and the circuit cells and do whatever it wants and the us will protect it, but in the multiple world. and it really needs to seek a piece today because the piece today will be much better than the piece it will have tomorrow, because it's negotiation power. so on the weekend as the relative power of the united states goes down. so if it accept this transition to multiple are the needs to start to find a peace agreement that ticket spinning on unit polarity, then it can effectively type just to avoid any compromise. before i run the the

while you're watching r t international right now is what i'm a put in is right now, meeting with the participants of a government educational program called time. so here is, let's say, goodness opinion of how to answer non to and share your ideas more about to move. not if you want to be the and at the most of the done. if they put a good, i'm in the near future to close it and you go like this program. so might continue . i'm going to do it as you've heard, but go to the idea of the category behind this program to that. she has to train it, certainly when they go to your, to me a good way, officials and veterans. so this by somebody trump, the ration who's of was born. when i met in the universe, the students who took part of the special mutual operation, most of it wasn't, sounds bit as bad and you go to, i set before them. i listened to watson. how many pounds? usually it was saying, some of them were wanted to do with the most through,

but all of them where, so this is the stick him. some of them cut off from us me. they asked me how to what else to do. a very do kind of a fire and the rice and dice problems a you with now we're saving good education and i looked at them see what and i was almost and the thoughts which movies me. that's one of the problems of today. what would you, what was your it's always been present, but it's especially relevant today as the technologies and the system. the conditions are changing and the managerial standards of changing as well as nice as a batch. so one of the most pressing challenges is if you're having a feel confident people, even though you should, when i looked at your comrades. and as i talk to them was like you get your thoughts. and nicole came into my mind extra if it's not these people that we can rely on, then we have

a great country and they will question that we have many people to as many to tell them to the people as well. you refuse to st dot to you a category, and among those who are talented earlier, we also have exclusive with those who look up a sacrifice when you then let me check the time of their life. so i think the most dangerous conditions you are recently had and you continue, but what i see, so she'll like us to miss what do you mean a day when we celebrated dealt with brushes? independence. i did choose compression never had an easy sign. expect you to always had a trials done and difficulties go to him. but we've always had people, didn't you mind it? just bear with me didn't you? sure didn't chuck from the responsibility of the latency with it, but it wouldn't affect the decision. it's not just of the country if you defended and to help it's trust by officials if you could,

because you end up inside that you go ahead and send to petersburg, fall into this category of people who to me. and i see if things are slightly sick on russia has always been famous for having this kind of people out in the field and they've done, i'm switching. it is a popular wisdom to know these people assured us that the full message to the basis for us is great. so she wouldn't as issue. not only were those the sub in the military to even the a human would you what you if a certain the whole those who fight for or someone that's shown the right excellence. i gramma, i know the very name is this program is, i mean it wasn't my idea image it was is, would you use a cabal for some proposed by colleagues from vehicle presidential executive officer the time of year is to assist you with community? we may sound a bit high flown, but it reflects the realities in the present day. let me see if we can very

accurately. we have many here's of the russian federation here today to awarded this title the post. and even though, even though, if you will see the shooting, you email, it is not pointing a good title more digital was the easy thing, right. the more study are you sure it is something that to get your sure things keep showing you true. here we got, so this is the background of this idea. i wanted to reach you to discuss your assessments of the programs progress and how you see the future program a couple repeatedly with this program. what do you think can be done up to the on blend utilize it when i bought them? so when the residential executive officer planned to put the cause of a passive something as opposed to the new email, the blood tournament with building on the experience that ceased on.