relative seems like today the dynamics are very different and it is becoming apparent with the pace of transformation and you asia with a number of large scale integration projects and being actively implemented as also accelerated significantly. you mean it is on the basis of the new political and economic reality that the contours of multiple are and multilateral world order are taking shape today. and this is an objective process. it reflects the cultural and civilizational diversity that despite all attempts at artificial unification is organically inherent in human beings. these profound systemic changes will undoubtedly inspire optimism and hope because we establishment of the principles of multiple already and multilateralism and international affairs. including respect for international law and broad representation, make it possible to solve the most complex problems together for the common good to establish mutually beneficial relations and cooperation among southern states in the interest of the wellbeing and security of people. so this went to this vision of the future is in line with the aspirations of the absolute majority of countries

in the world simulate. you may receive this among other things in the growing interest towards the work of such a universal association as breaks, which is based on a special culture of trustful dialog. silver and the quality is quite as prince and mutual respect. within the framework of this you as the russian presidency, we will facilitate the smooth integration of new bricks, members into the working structures of the association by us, the government and the ministry of foreign affairs, to continue substantive work and dialogue with our partners in order to come to the break some of the thing cuz i'm in october with the substantial set of agreed decisions that will determine the vector of our cooperation in politics and security economy in finance, science, culture, sports and humanitarian tides. in general, i believe that the potential of breaks will allow it to become one of the core regulatory institutions of the multiple, the world. or in this context. i would like to note that the international discussion on the parameters of interaction between states and the multiple world and the democratization of the entire system of international relations is of course already underway. this together with colleagues from the come and wealth of

independent states. we have agreed on and adopted a joint document on international relations in a multi polar world. we have invited our partners to discuss this issue in the context of other international platforms festival in the seo and bricks and maryland. we are interested in seeing this dialogue seriously developed within the united nations, including on such a fundamental issue of vital importance to as the creation of a system of indivisible security that was placed. in other words, the establishment and world affairs of the principle that the security of some cannot be guaranteed at the expense of the security of others is a pessimist. you let me remind you that at the end of the 20th century, after the end of the acute military ideological confrontation, the global community had a unique opportunity to build a reliable and just order in the field of securities. this did not require much simple ability to listen to the opinions of all interested parties and a mutual willingness to take them into account to our country was determined to do exactly this kind of constructive work. not however,

a different approach prevailed. the western powers then by the united states believe that they had won the cold war and had the right to determine how the world should be organized. yet the practical manifestation of this outlook was the project of unlimited expansion of the north atlantic block in space. and time, despite the existence of alternative ideas for ensuring security in europe, they responded to are justified questions with excuses, claiming that there were no plans to attack russia. and that the expansion of nato was not directed against russia. they effectively forgot about the promises made to the soviet union and later russia in the late 19 eighties and early 19 nineties. that the block would not accept new members. even if they acknowledged those promises, they would grant and dismiss them as mere verbal assurances. instead, what not legally binding in the 19 nineties and later we consistently pointed out the flawed approach taken by western elite. instead of simply criticizing and warning them, we suggested options and constructive solutions. whereas list emphasizing the need to develop a mechanism of european and global security that wouldn't be acceptable to all parties involved. i want to understand on this point,

it would take too long to list all the initiatives advanced by rush. i opened the yesterday to let us recall the idea of a european security treaty, if we proposed in 2008 and we, but it was an issue, a new decision december 2021. a memorandum from the russian foreign ministry was submitted to the united states and nato addressing the same issue. however, all are repeated attempts. it is impossible to list them all to convince our partners as well as our explanations appeals warnings and requests met with no response. here can you be? she's wisdom countries, confidence not so much in the right, just most of their cause as in their power or inability to impose whatever they wish. and the rest of the world simply disregarded other perspectives. even though you do my best to propose discussions on less significant matters that did little to resolve the actual problems, human conform matters that only benefit in the west. and it soon became clear that the wisdom concept seen as the only viable option for security and prosperity in europe. and the world was, in fact, ineffective. and the, let us recall the tragedy in the bulk and sort of to turn you. meanwhile, domestic issues had certainly contributed to the problems in former yugoslavia,

they were greatly exacerbated by intrusive external interference. at that time, the main principal of native diplomacy manifested itself most vividly which i deeply flog principal that is of no use in addressing complex internal conflicts or even innocence. this principle aims to assign blame to one party, often disliked by the west for various reasons. and unleashed the full political, informational, and military might of the west, including economic sanctions and restrictions against it. later, the same approaches were applied in various countries, which we know all too well. what's your kind of show up with them? iraqi or syria, libya and that's kind of these interventions have done nothing but worse than existing problems. room in the lives of millions of people. this will destroy entire states and create hubs of humanitarian and social disasters. as well as terrorist on classes. in fact, no country in the world is immune from joining this tragic list. for example, the west is currently trying to brazenly meddling the affairs of the middle east and the previously held the monopoly over this region. and the consequences of

their actions are now evident to everyone make of the south caucasus, and central asia are also prime. example. since i mean 2 years ago at the nato summit in madrid, it was declared that the alliance would now deal with security issues. not only in the euro atlantic, but also in the asia pacific region, they claim those areas cannot do without them. clearly, this was an attempt to exert more pressure on those countries in the region whose development they have decided to restrain. as you know, russia ranks high on this list. let me also remind you that it was washington that undermine strategic stability by unilaterally withdrawing from the treaties on anti missile defense on the elimination of intermediate and shorter arrangements house and on open skies. and together with exp, nato satellites, dismantling the decades old system of confidence, building measures and arms control in europe. can you last name, the self centeredness and arrogance of western countries have let us do a highly perilous situation. today. we are entering dangerously close to a point of no return. your calls for a strategic defeat of russia, which possesses the largest arsenal of nuclear weapons, demonstrated the extreme recklessness of western politicians. you must through it.

they either fail to comprehend the magnitude of the threats they are creating. a part are simply consumed by that notion of invincibility and exceptionalism. but both scenarios can result in tragedy. it is evident that the entire system of euro atlantic security is crumbling before our eyes. at present, it is practically nonexistent, and must be rebuilt. to achieve this, we must collaborate with interest in countries of which there are many ways to develop our own strategies for ensuring security in your agent and then presented them for broader international deliberation. hamilton, this is the task set and the address to the federal assembly here what i say to outline a vision for equal and indivisible security. mutually beneficial and equitable cooperation and development on the origin continent in the foreseeable future. so we can just do it as a need to what needs to be done to achieve this stage and on what principles. first, it is important to establish dialogue with all potential participants in this future security system, which i would like to ask you to address the necessary issues with countries that are open to constructive interaction with the russian. during my recent visit to china is going to president,

she didn't thing and i discuss this issue. it was noted that the russian proposal is not contradictory, but rather compliments and aligns with the basic principles of the chinese global security initiative. it needs to be february. second, it is crucial to recognize that the future security architecture should be open to all your original countries that wish to participate in its creation. for all includes european and nato countries, as well as to them, is this loan of georgia. we share the same continent and we must live and work together regardless of the circumstances. geography cannot be changed. yes. russia's relations with you and many european countries have deteriorated, and it is important to emphasize that we are not to blame for the out. the rest of the propaganda campaign involving senior european politicians and which is accompanied by speculation that russia intends to attack us. i have addressed this issue before and there is no need to repeat it again here. we all understand that these claims are baseless and so i've only to justify an honest rice in this context. i would like to make a brief digression to make sure it's a threat to europe does not come from russia. the main threat to europeans is that

critical and increasing dependence on the united states and military, political, technological, ideological and information on aspects which escape europe is being marginalized in global economic development. plunged into the chaos of challenges such as migration and losing international agency and cultural identity for me, it was different, always close. sometimes i get the impression that therapy and politicians and representatives of the europe and bureaucracy are more afraid of falling out of favor with washington. than losing the trust of their own people slips to the recent election to the european parliament. as also demonstrated this european politicians tolerate termination, rudeness and scandals such as surveillance of european leaders. while the united states simply exploits them for its own benefit. for instance, they are forced to purchase expensive gas, which costs $3.00 to $4.00 times more in europe than in the united states. additionally, european countries are pressure to increase, i'm supplies to ukraine. the demands are constant and sanctions are readily imposed

on your plate is without any hesitation and super, they are now pressuring their partners to supply ukraine with more weapons and increase their capacity for manufacturing artillery shouts. who will need these shows. once the conflict and ukraine ends, how does this insure european military security? it is difficult to understand the united states as investing in military technologies, particularly advanced future technologies such as space explorations, modern drones, and strikes systems based on new physical principles could use the principles from united states as funding areas that will shape the nature of future conflicts as well as the military and political power of nations and the standing in the world, we knew that these countries are expected to invest in areas of interest to the united states. however, this does not expand european potential. let them do as they wish. we would probably benefit from it, but in effect, that is a situation if you're a points to continue being an independent center of global development and the cultural and civilizational total on our planet are coming, you should definitely maintain good and friendly relations with russia. most importantly, we are ready for this. indeed,

politicians have truly european and global scale who patriots of the countries and nations understand this simple and obvious fact. they think in terms of historical categories and on not me, it follows of someone else is willing to influence each how's the goal and spoke about this. during the postwar period, i vividly recall participating in a conversation in 1991 with german chancellor. helmut kohl emphasize the importance of partnership between europe and russia, and i hope that new generations of european politicians will eventually restore this legacy. speaking of the united states, the never ending attempts by the current global as liberal and leads to spread their ideology worldwide to maintain their imperial status and dominance in one way or another are only further exhausting the country leading to its degradation. and clearly, contrary to the genuine interest of the american people, if it were not for this debt and policy driven by aggressive mechanism based on the belief in their own superiority and exceptionalism. international relations would have long been stabilized with 3rd just necessary to significantly intensify the

dialogue process between multilateral organizations. already operating a new ratio to promote the idea of you ration security system of old such organizations as the united states, the collective security treaty organization, the ration economic union, the commonwealth of independent states and the shanghai cooperation organizations that we consider it possible that other influential your ration associations from southeast asia to the middle east will join these processes in the future for we believe that the time has come to start the discussion of a new system of bilateral and multilateral guarantees of collective security in your ration. at the same time, it is necessary in the long time to gradually phase of the military presence of external powers in the region region. here, of course, we are aware that in the current situation, this point may seem unrealistic, but that will change. however, if we build a reliable security system in the future, there will simply be no need for such a presence of out of region military contingency. to be honest, there are no need today either just occupation and that's all. in the final analysis,

we believe that countries and regional structures and the ratio should themselves identifying the specific areas of cooperation in joint security. so just leave as a guided by this, they must also build a system of working institutions, mechanisms, and agreements that would really serve to achieve common stability and development goals. in this sense, we support our bella, russian friends initiative to develop a program document, a charter of multiple r t and diversity in the 21st century bugle. and it can formulate not only the framework, principles of your asian architecture based on the essential norms of international law, but also strategic vision of the nature of multiple entity in a broader sense, the other with them and the multilateralism as a new system of international relations which would replace the wisdom centric world edition of something that i consider it important. i would like to ask you to thoroughly look out on this document without partners and with all interested states. and i will add that when discussing such complicated and comprehensive issues, we need as broad representation as possible and a consideration of different approaches and positions usage and the 5th, a crucial part of the your agents,

security and development systems. macbooks should definitely be the issues of the economy. social well beings, mature integration and mutually beneficial cooperation from the city as well as addressing such common problems as overcoming poverty, inequality the clements of the environment. and developing mechanisms to respond to the threats of thunder mixing crises in the global economy. all that is important, the west not only undermine the world's military political stability by its actions . it is compromise and we can the key market institutions by sanctions and trade was using the i m f and the world bank and twisting the climate agenda. it has been restraining the development of the global south yielding and competition even by the rules that the west has written for itself. it applies prohibitive, barriers, and all kinds of protectionism. excuse me, that the united states has abandoned the world trade organization. as an international trade regulator, everything is blocked where meanwhile, the pressure is exerted and not only on competitors, but on their own satellites. suffice it to see how they are now siphoning off the juices from the european economies which are teetering on the brink of recession.

western countries have frozen some of russia's assets and currency results, and now they are trying to invent some legal justification for that. it reversible appropriation on the other hand. however, despite all the crooked lawyers and festival obviously remains theft and will not go unpunished. the issue is even deep by stealing russian assets. they will take one more step towards destroying the system that they created themselves. and that for many decades, ensure that prosperity allowed them to consume more than they on and attracted money from all over the world through debts and liabilities. here. now it is becoming clear to all countries, companies and silver and wealth funds that their assets and reserves are far from safe, both legally and economically. and anyone could be the next in line for expropriation by the united states and the west. those far and southern wealth funds could also be the one that found that there was already a growing distrust of the financial system based on western reserve currency. as it has appeared, a certain outflow of funds from securities and bonds of western countries, as well as from some european banks, which were until fairly recently considered to be absolutely reliable to put

capital in. gold is also being taken out from those banks. and this is the right thing to do. i believe that we need to seriously intensify the formation of effective and safe by level and multi level for an economic mechanisms as alternatives to those controlled by the west. this includes the expansion of settlements and national currency if the creation of independent payment systems and the building of value chains that bypass the channels and you're locked or compromised by the west, is naturally it is necessary to continue efforts to develop international transport car doors in your ration, the continental is russia as its natural geographical cross product through the ministry of foreign affairs. i instruct you to assist as much as possible in developing international agreements and all these areas. they are extremely important for strengthening economic cooperation between our country and our partners. they should also given new emphasis to building a large your asian partnership, which in essence may become a socio economic basis for a new indivisible security system. in your colleagues, our proposals aimed to establish a system where all nations can feel secure with such a framework,

we could approach today's numerous conflicts in a different way. because more constructively, the issues of insecurity and mutual distrust are not limited to the rage and continental rising. tensions are evidence worldwide in the interconnection and independence or 5 world constantly, apparently with the ukrainian crisis. serving as a tragic example with this repercussion spreading across the globe. do you want to clarify right away? the crisis involving ukraine is not a conflict between 2 states, so people standing from issues between them. so if that were the case, there is no doubt that the russians and ukrainians, united by shared history and culture, spiritual values and the millions of familial and human connections would have found a fair resolution to any disputes and disagreements. meanwhile, the situation is different. as the roots of the conflict are not in bilateral relations, the events in ukraine are a direct result of global and european developments from the late 20th and early 21st century. so a, b, c. they stem from the aggressive unrestrained bodily reckless policy that the west has been pursuing for many years long before the special military off ration again

like the leads of western countries. as i mentioned earlier today is the set of cost for further geo political restructuring of the world. after the end of the cold war, they came to establish and enforce the so called rules based order, strong solver and self sufficient states simply do not belong with this explains the policy of containment directed against our country as something is in the united states in europe openly declared that goes of this policy speaking today about the so called the colonized nation of russia. so essentially, this is an attempt to ideologically adjust to find the division of fatherland along ethnic lines. the dismemberment of the soviet union and russia has been a discussion topic for a long time. is everyone in this room is well aware in pursuing the strategy, western countries, ink absorber, and militarily, and politically develop territories nearest east that have been 5. now, 6 waves of nato expansion, they sought to transform ukraine into the stronghold and anti russia. to achieve these objectives, they invested money and resources. both additions and the entire parties, rewrote history and educational programs. and not you in groups of neo nazis and

radicals. and you want me to stay for that because they did everything possible to undermine our interstate ties. divide us, you can turn out people's against each other. they would have pursued that policy even more brazenly and unceremoniously, had it not been for southeastern ukraine, the region that had been part of historical great to russia for centuries, which was in their way, the people who lived there and still do, continued to advocate veteran closer ties with our country, including when ukraine declared independence in 1991 ethnic russians and ukrainians, as well as representatives of other ethnic groups. they were united by the russian language, culture, traditions, and historical memories. ukrainian presidents and presidential hopefuls simply have to reckon with the opinions, moods and interests of those people through the millions of people living in the southeast ukraine and politicians needed their votes. however, having use their support when running for high posts, they later maneuvered out of doing what they promised got out of it lied and cited the so called european joyce. they did not dare several to as with russia, though,

because se in ukraine had a different view. and one that was to be reckoned with this to ality has always been present in the ukrainian government's policies ever since the recognition of independence, the west. so that of course, the request and politicians have long been aware of the problems in ukraine that could be raked up. they also realize the importance of the se as a restraining factor. and knew that even use of propaganda could not radically change that. now that they were not trying, but it was really difficult to reverse, the situation tries, they might, there was not a chance they could distort the historical identity and consciousness of the majority of people in southeastern new cream, to eradicate good feelings for russia. and the sense of our historical communities, even from the younger generations. and they decided to use force again to go and break the people in the southeast as if they didn't matter to do this. they masterminded, organized and financed an armed crew. clearly taking advantage of the difficulties and political infighting and ukraine, they pretended purposefully inconsistent. they will squeeze the massive wave of riots. violence and motors swept federal ukrainian cities. finally,

radical nationalist seized and use of power and castaways their aggressive nationalist slogans, including the rehabilitation of nazi henchmen were proclaimed at the level of state ideology and the no great and the policy of abolishing the russian language and all aspects of government of society and stepped up pressure on orthodox believers and interference in church affairs, which eventually led to a schism. no one seemed to notice that interference, like it was no big deal. try something like this elsewhere. everyone will go so ballistic, you will regret it to them. so that over there, this is allowed because it is against russia, as is well known as millions of people residing in ukraine, primarily. and it's eastern regions made a stand against the cool. they began to be threatened with violence and tara, who, in the 1st place, the new authorities in cuba, started preparing an attack on the russian speaking crimea. which many as you may know, was transferred from the rest of us out to ukraine in 1954 with the violation of all, no arms of the law and procedures, even those in effect in the soviet you and at that time,

because in this situation we certainly could not abandon and leave without protection of the people of crimea. and so, based upon him, they made their choice. and as is common knowledge, the historic unification of premiums investable with the rest that took place in march 2014, the peaceful protest against the cooling cod gulf coast on odessa, the internet's against unmarried, but were suppressed with the key of regime and nationalist groups unleashing the reign of tara human, but there is no need to recall all this for everyone is well aware of what was happening in those regions. in may, 2014 referendums were held on the status of the the net screen, little guns people's republics, at which the overwhelming majority of local people voted for independence and sovereignty. or what i mean this bids the following question. so it people generally express their willing this way and declare their independence people present in this room know that they certainly could and had the full right and reason to do that under international law, including the rights of people to self determination. and there is no need to remind this to you, of course, but seems to the media are at work. i will say that the article one paragraph 2 of

the un charter. it extends this right now, but it was not letting me recall in this connection, the notorious cost of a precedent, which we spoke many times about this in the past. but i will say it once again. now, the precedent that the western countries created themselves in an absolutely identical situation. they recognized kosovo succession from serbia in 2008 as legitimate to assume that plato, the international court of justice, issued its well known advisory opinion based on article one, the kind of graph 2 of the one shot to it ruled on 22 in july 2010, that's my quote so easily since, you know, general prohibition against unilateral declaration of independence may be inferred from the practice of the security council students next, quote. the general international law contains no applicable probation of declarations of independence. more than that, it said that the parts of any country which decided to declare their independence were not obliged to apply to the central organs of their former state. they wrote all this with their own hand in black and white, so that the denette skimmed against republics, have the right to declare their independence. and of course they did,

of this issue even can not be considered in a different way. but what does the key of regime do in this situation? she keeps it fully disregarded people's choice and unleashed a full scale war against the new independent states. and the people's republic have done best. with the use of aircraft artillery and tanks, they launched the bombing and artillery of tax on peaceful city stores and resorted to intimidation for you to, to the will. so what happened next up in the system will the people have done best took up arms to protect their lives, their homes, their rights and legitimate interest in the west. the prevailing narrative is that russia initiated the war with its special military operation, and is therefore the aggressor. so it is allowed to attack the russian territory using wisdom weaponry. it is argued that ukraine is merely defending himself and is justified in doing so. i want to reiterate, russia did not start the war. it was the kia, presume that initiated hostilities following the declaration of independence by residents of certain parts of ukraine in accordance with international law. and continues to do so. if we do not recognize the right of these peoples to declare

their independence, then this is indeed aggressive to keep students from the others are those who have supported the camera zooms war machine all over the years, the are there for accomplices to this aggression. and bruce cities, and then you school back in 2014, the residence of dumbass refused to surrender. to be released. that unit stood their ground from repelled the punitive forces and eventually pushed them back from the net squeaks and had little guns. cuz pretty recently, we hope this wouldn't bring those who initiated the violence to their senses. you, me to hold the bloodshed, you rush. i made its customary appeals for negotiations. adults began involving cubes and representatives of the done best republics with the support of russia, germany, and france. we took them pen, the tops were not easy, but ultimately led to the conclusion of the mist agreements in 2015. we took their implementation very seriously, hoping to resolve the situation within the framework of the peace process and international law. there was hope that this would lead to the recognition of the legitimate interests and demands of done by us, including in training the special status of these regions physically and ensuring

the fundamental rights of the people living there followed while maintaining ukraine's territorial integrity. we were prepared for this and sought to persuade the residents of these territories to resolve issues through such means. and what would you get to the of the, of wanted to come here since i was 12, when my grandfather told me that his mom came from russia that we were, i was part russian. i didn't plan on staying this long. i was gonna look around, i was gonna see if it was for me, but then i came and then i was like, i remember when i go home, i've never been happier in life than i am here in russell. the i've only lived here a few months, but i wanted to tell you what fascinates me about russia and share the stories of

other foreigners who lived here. like jay who worked as a chef and now raises gods and makes cheese in the countryside series. like chad who has been granted political asylum because he's being persecuted by the f. b. i . us, embassies. and for countries that come asking me it's, it's wild like an american family that recently moved to russia with 6 children. i've never felt safer at land tire life than living here. the screen was even as convenient as proof. the western forces considered the peoples of the balkans as well as many other places. fundamentally, sweet one where the be starting their own sites. they wants to pull their own features and wishes into it. it's impossible to transfer the way of life of some

distant place to another space. because nations have their own history. the own presence of the teacher, the, the, the, what is part of the the employee would posted isn't the, the 1st 2 of us entered in the word or is it something deeper, more complex might be present good. let's stop without a leash is. let's go out of the

the,

[000:00:00;00] the, we're being told to move out because there is a very high risk of this building collapsing of some story this. so a 7. so that is kill the euclidean slide letterhead, a residential building. and the russian for the top. once again be a privilege and a pleasure to serve does great nation in the position of president rob upside so i really like to the south african president nava is positively used to