as subsidizing households as part of his job and in the district at for the much huh. cost of energy. as a result of the interruption of the plentiful edge, the deductible, and cost a and a cheap supplies from russia. can i just briefly touch on what sort of security check some screening for refugees? what are they being subjected to when entering germany? how easy or otherwise isn't for potential terrorist to actually get through? well i think you have to distinguish the that's supposed to be controls at the use ext uh front. yeah. but the effectively, these are k dogs, a very stringent leave, for example, they should be taking that fingerprints and check the of good information about the identity of the asylum. see got against the

base within the you. that's not be happening. so for the most part, a refugees are getting into jeopardy, getting into the you without any significant checks at all. and once they've entered the you, they basic the road free, the truck, you and it's a far as the german border is concerned. they just cross without any checks. obviously, in the circumstances, i mean ice is all the terrorist organizations will be done is if they didn't take advantage of, uh, uh, bringing in lots of potential tattered this by the refugee route. okay. it's literally the power to sign a policy is an invitation to terrorist talk to you, dr. gunner, back german politician and for member of the european parliament from the alternative for germany party. we thank you very much. thank you very much bye. and

that's where we leave a busy and you spell it in for now, but our programs are just getting started. see what's showing river your caching us from today, and we'll, let's, this is our to international the, [000:00:00;00] the of the they have the supreme court overturn griswold. so they can prevent american women from contraception. they may say we wouldn't do that because of precedent. why would

anyone believe them any sooner? chuck humor raises. question americans are often asking lately, why would anyone believe republicans anymore? yeah, when it comes to reproductive rights for public and say they are doing exactly what they have always campaign to do on sky. now here's an on this edition of $360.00 view. we're going to look at the latest on the battle for reproductive rights in america contraception. and if this is creating a very lucky path for republicans on the campaign trail, let's get started. the supreme court overtraining roe vs wade in june of 2022 has a lead democrats to victory in election since no democrats have decided this topic

is their best chance for continued success in 2024. but fearing the attention subsiding on the subject have introduced another aspect into the argument, the right, the contraception and in vitro fertilization. now senate majority leader, chuck schumer, democrat from new york, is planning to potentially force for publicans to take tough boats on the issues. portable republicans will have to face their constituents from far right to independence, single issue voters, and cannot avoid the controversial topic. the hey vocal minority of the party feel both i vs and birth control are in the same category as abortion, and should be out loud. now try and prevent any damage to the g o. p. lead. it's didn't. republicans are going on a talk show circuit, tore all the try and change the narrative as a matter of law or there should be a choice that is available for parents because it is profoundly pro family eat enables at the ivy f enables i, i have a lot of friends,

i'm sure you to that it is how they are parents and they love their children. they want to raise their children. they want to be incredible moms and dads, etc, ted cruz, etc. katie brett introduced legislation to prevent states from blocking access to i vs services. and when asked about those who feel the fertilized eggs not used or an ivy of treatments or form of abortion, the texas senator had this to say. i think that's a moral decision. any person can make and that that's a decision they can make with, according to their faith and, and, and according to their understanding of god's teaching. now where it joined cruise in his interview, arguing members of the democratic party are fear mongering that republicans wished to ban ivy on. the left is fear mongering, saying that we are not going to protect ivy f i v f as protected and senator cruz and i are going to make sure it continues to be protective. it is pro life, it's proof family, it's per woman. and i believe it was

a party of families. this new legislation comes after alabama's top court ruled, frozen embryos are legally children. and the destruction of these embryos constitute a crime under the states wrongful death of a minor law. now the abortion of reproduction takes center stage. it seems women are increasingly becoming more or less leaning. well, men are becoming more conservative. and the whole reason contraception is such a hot topic is because the hook of culture and getting married later in life is becoming a societal norm. another times of chaperones in waiting for marriage seemed to actually be long gone. but is this actually beneficial? or is there something to be said about taking responsibility for the people you decide to sleep with? having prepared with sex actually increases the odds of getting a divorce by 400 percent. and using contraception before or during marriage increases the odds of getting a divorce. i have to to 100 percent and there's

a lot to impact. so let's bring in our panel health professional and do a dessie k robinson. woodrow johnson, who is the ceo of revere, strategies and timothy gordon, who is the host of the pod cast rules for retrograde. thank you so much for joining me on this lots to unpack on it. it does say i want to start with the abortion issue because democrats feel this is a topic which can garner them support and engagement. so even republicans can't really blame them for trying to make it a repeating headline. however, how spell it is do you think the republican party on this side of issues of i v f and contraception? it seems as though the very slit and, you know, take cruise, who is, i don't know if he's the modem of, of morality for a party. but, you know,

he just said that idea should be a matter of, you know, a family's moral compass, and that is what literally people in people who have any conscious around the choice and say, a whole spectrum of reproductive rates, reproductive break compass is everything, someone's decisions to have a baby, someone's decision not to bring the baby to term. and so all of that is a decision that happens with within a family and for a woman. and for anyone she or, or she for that matter. because matt, have a choice is whether they want to engage in families. they have to make those decisions for themselves. and that is not what is over whelming. we spoken about within the republican party. they're consistently trying to control women's bodies . this is a part of freedom control women's bodies. and along with that comes to the level of

she, you know, even in the, your lead in talking about her own chair. it implies that there is some level of i'm assuming that is going on. people are running while they're meeting the fortunes to, to read them. some of the, she of them haven't freedom to have sex with some of the issues. but isn't that what sexual freedom is? so jesse is the ability to run around and have sex with whoever you choose and not facing the consequences for it's about not facing any consequences and everyone has the consequences for me. so the decisions that they make, but the, the talking points and the republic give sort of framework is that people should be shade and punished for having sex. and they should go and have babies because that's what they deserve. if they decide to have sex and that doesn't do anything, but she,

when they blame women and bring children into the world who are going to be left in the world where republicans over the last 2 years has been i have a formula, we had a formula shortage, these are the same, the same party who's like, why do we have to pay for other people shoulders at once. they never want to engage in any of the social programs that ameliorate the lives of people want to have children. i never hear any talking points or any defense. oh, really reading the lives of people who have children. i never hear in the left. i mean, excuse me, the right talking about you can pay. i never heard the right talking about universal health care. i never heard the right talking about family leave and i dont showing that were here the right talking about the who the maternal numbers of black maternal health. okay. when you have a chance,

give me well call you back. now i agree that now i will bring woodrow into this because as we're all the time or the republicans, democrats are saying that decision from dogs versus jackson threatens the right to birth control. however, the case just included at the constitution does not confer a right to abortion. and the authority to regulate abortion is returned to the people in their elected representatives. so on the opposite side of there are democrats gas fighting this issue for election purposes. the sky. yeah, 100 percent, their gas letting us. i mean no, no, thank 0, the guest. i mean there's just, everything's the same just isn't correct. i haven't seen a republican say any other thing she say, you just played a clip of a bunch of the leaders in our party. not, you know, literally saying the opposite of what she's saying. so i, i mean, you know, other than the, the side notes in the end, but which we can unpack if you want to. but if there's, is, this is absolutely disappear, monitoring from, from the democrats. well, that's the thing, tennessee i've gotta ask you,

cuz i can say your facial expressions during this conversation. if you don't necessarily agree, do you agree with how republicans are handling this conversation and should be more joining? and i mean right now is just ted cruz and katie, bread that are talking about legislation to protect ivy. you have to counter democrats, go after them. what should be the conversation that's being had was we all know republican service helplessly long housed and we shouldn't listen to them. but i want to address the 2 fundamental principles that western civilization was predicated on. number one, people should be shamed and punished for having sex outside of marriage because the family is the single cell of society and you can't have society without shame and punishment for having sex outside of marriage. number 2, i stop this country, began to resemble a foundational principle around the civil war. that's what we're told by the historians, that people should be shamed and punished for murdering other people. now,

i don't really care what ted cruz thinks about. i v f because he's a long house to republican. but if does in every case stand for multiple murders of literal human beings? and by the way, so does contraception we we found out that almost all contraception always has the possibility of acting as an a board of fits in. so if we believe in these 2 foundational principles of western civilization, i don't really care what some cocked republicans say about it. what a true christian believes about this is that sex outside of marriage kills society, and killing humans, kills humans. and those are the 2 foundational principles of all western society. so i'd like to hear the response to that, or do we still believe killing humans is wrong in this country? dessie desi. as well, we can have a conversation about what is considered a human when you have

a lot of those of cell inside of a you know, person is still be in this country. yes, it is wrong. i'm the person that would be more like a person on the train floss or i'm talking about human beings biologically. and philosophically you've got 46 chromosomes of human beings. i'm asking, do you think murder and humans is wrong? i'm not talking about persons. i'm. i'm murdered human that we're really people who are alive is murder. yes, that is person. right? yes. at a time the view and i do not agree on so we can continue personally begins at like 40 years old. do you believe that a 2 year old can be murder? so in the kentucky, you know, i get what you're going to do, but i, i think does, he has the point. in fact, it's one person believes that lies together conception initial and the other person

believes at some point that see i imagine you believe once the baby takes its 1st breath, sometimes are, or at some point during the that 9 month period. that's still the debate that happens at the same time. you know, i want to bring this back to how we started this. i'm going to bring you in on this one. woodrow because this, the politically, the political zation is what i want to focus on is because we can have the philosophical, we can have the religious, we can have that debate. we're trying to focus on the politics of this because i think both sides are using this towards their own advantage as to the disadvantage of the, of the people involved. so what drug does is take the wind of democrats, sell it for publicans. do decide to take more of an aggressive stance or do they risk to disengaging the more conservative wing by agreeing with democrats regarding the need for contraception? ivy yes, i don't think it's a matter of republicans agreeing with contraceptive or not. it's just, this is where the why is and they are, i mean simply this is just the email i mean,

like, you know, and i might personally agree with uh, with, with my friend here, but i, that's just not where the lights and it's just completely out of last sealed, and ironically how do i feel under that side of it? well, you know, i do want to, i talked about this 3rd actually because contraception access to birth control has found a way into the national defense authorization act of all things. we talked about women, reproductive rights, never thought that i would see it actually put into the national defense authorization act in the form of an amendment that expands access to contraception for women in uniform saying that it's important for military readiness. do you see this as an act of desperation to the birth control, to be ready for body think they're trying to make this a little bit more complicated than what should be? well, doesn't need to be complicated to extend the rights of people to a gauge and have birth control available to them so that they can make the decisions that die the trajectory the life it is simple. now we want to get into

the, we've about 8 the complex, but i mean, the reality is 90 percent of women to use birth control at some point in their life . and so it is a form of health care. and so we want people to be military ready, one to be ready for anything. so we're, we have to give them the choice and the ability to make the decisions that's, that's the trajectory there. why at birth control is included in that it is included in the conversation of the complete our reproductive rights that i have or is it. but i would wonder if that argument would go against that. but that was the argument that would be why women should even be allowed to be in combat. those to be on the front lines. and they'll try because of the fact that they had those reproductive, those reproductive capabilities. don't you think this kind of brings that into question if, if, why are we bringing sex into it? shouldn't they all be counted equal regardless? well, it's a, it's

a medical condition. it would be no different by the male or female being on the front lines together. why are they having sex? if they're there to fight a war? how does that military preparedness no, having sex with joe there? well, i mean, it, there, that's the thing. this is about being military prepared for a war prepared men and women together having that's how babies are made. so why is this? why are we paying for birth control, the part of our military defense spending? why are we not actually spending it to defend our country? why we keep, why wouldn't we allow a womans, i have an opportunity to use birth control. if it is once a p for military, right? i don't understand why we would, it wouldn't extend that price to kill society. well, i thought we all functioned on the premise that what kills society and enter rates us weakens us and emboldens our foes is bad and ought to be outlawed. well, particularly at the state level,

which holds the 10th amendment police powers. and by the way, all the states held the 10th amendment police powers until 1965 and this country, griswold versus connecticut, which is it to radically federal overreach. but, but, and so i'm not even saying to regulate this at the national level. i'm just saying to go back to what this country always stood for, which is the principal, then under the police power of the 10th amendment. most states don't want, unless they're run by elite global lists that are really trying to kill nations and borders and stay and all those things. we shouldn't stand up for things that enter vate and destroy society. and those things which innovate and destroy the family, also innovate and destroy the society. and guess what? a bunch of young people running around without pants on impregnating one another and then slaughtering their babies is bad for society. it turns out that i just got the newspaper, it says that if anyone shot, well, it didn't say that, that's the premise also dismantled the borders and which every,

every republican says that we're supposed to be fiercely to say, well, so if we're not engaging in war 2, right, before we take a break, i want to talk about the economy because we're going to go into it more in depth. because when it comes to economy and contraception, there is a redford wilton strategy survey found more than 50 percent of generations, z millennials. so they're putting off children because the cost of living is so expensive. economy as in right, the number one issue for voters is false. so society setting too high of a standard for the current generation by eliminating all of their options. woodrow what's your question? i am ready for it. why? because it is a car. we setting the standards to lie with our economy being so bad. people are wanting to we're not wanting. we're not wanting to have kids. yeah, i mean a 100 percent and honestly, i think this is all part of the strategy. they don't want americans to have more kids. they want to more legals to come into our country. they want to make our

economy as terrible as possible because they don't want americans to succeed. is that simple? well, that's the woodrow typically gordon. i want you to stay right there because we're gonna take a quick break. and when we come back, we are going to discuss about how the, the, or should the political views, but not for the effects. this legislation is having us decide in the future. say to will be back. i'm executive and i'm here to plan with you whatever you do. do not watch my new show seriously. why watch something that's so different little opinions that he won't get anywhere else. welcome to please, or do the have the state department c i a weapons, bankers, multi 1000000000 dollar corporations. choose your fax for you. go ahead. i changed and whatever you do, don't want my shell stay main street because i'm probably going to make you

uncomfortable. my show is called stretching time, but again, you probably don't wanna watch it because it might just change the wayne state the, the the welcome back to 360 view i'm your has got to know he's now across united states. the catholic church is undergoing an immense shift or even the beginnings of a full split generations of catholics who embrace the modernization of the 19 sixty's by the vatican are increasingly giving away to religious conservative. now while others, including this current president of the united states are embracing

a much more progressive form of the religious madeline hays. a student at benedictine college takes the church's rules, very serious from people pre marital sex to confession. and she's seriously considering becoming or not. and she has a 3 female students, also considering the same location. there are a lot of things that are like non negotiable to a lot of us who are faithful catholics. and so we don't believe that the church will ever say that like contraception is acceptable. however, i don't think catholics in the past would have ever expect the pontiff, during his 11 years tenure as head of the church to suggest even a cs go to have it and saying that he did not judge homosexuals as well as taking a softer stance on abortion and re marriage. this debate is not just happening in the catholic church. several denominations within the protestant church are either in the midst of the debate or splitting over the same issues. therefore,

the foundation of our religious communities are starting to fracture. what effect is that having on society? well, i'm gonna bring back in our panel, dusty k robson, health professional, and do a literal johnson, the ceo of revere, strategies and timothy cordon. host of rules for retrograde past podcast. timothy, i'm gonna start with you. how much of a debate do you believe is happening within the catholic church on this issue? and is this kind of divisiveness over an issue new to the catholic church and it's relatively new. as of the late 19 sixty's, the vatican, the 2nd vatican council ran from 1962 to 1965. and what you had there was a loot of renegade pilots who were still a minority, but who had skimmed to make certain things happen that that happened that have been dogmatically blocked for nearly 2000 years at that point. and they used the

weaponized ambiguity to put these certain 6 topics on the table. and in the 1970s following the counsel e u, i had a couple of liberal popes, notably the 6 who was expected to undo the teachings on contraception. the teachings long held from the decay onward against contraception, the time of the apostles. and he shocked everyone when he released whom on a v today and said no, i can't do it even if i were as liberal as everyone expects. i'm holding the line so in the roman catholic faith it's, it's the one world view. i don't think we should talk about religion. we should talk about the single world you single christianity in the world. where upon the principle of non contradiction is regarded so highly that the, i don't know what you want to call it. the dialectical materialism of a gallon is of the idea that history moves in steps incrementally and all options

will eventually be on the table is singly outlined. so we just believe a jose and it always league way. so in that sense, scotty, there's not really any dialogue to be had no, put francis has very left ease amana vatike into, in every conceivable sense. right. and he wants it to be a debate, but it's not. okay, well i want to bring in woodrow real quick of this to your point. americans criticized other countries who use legislation to control families trying to come to mind. is this not a little hypocritical for dc to have this much influence or try to have this much influence over family planning? i. i don't, i don't think it's ever critical because i reject the problem. so the question sky, i don't think that, and even though you know, being tennessee probably go to the same cx churchman, probably i, i don't think that this get, this kind of stuff is happening in washington. it's just not happening. well, i mean if you're talking about birth control, you're talking about i v f. if you talk about all those sorts of things as d. c getting involved in it, dusty,

i've got to come to you in our last few minutes. so we have together. i have to as so just you know, devil's advocate or not, is it fair to hold our children to the same standards of the past and suppressed what is a natural desire today society considering all the pop culture pressure for intimacy before marriage and expect our children to be held at the same standards that existed in the 1950s. well, i'm just a little bit of the beginning of your question, but what i would say is, i think that we have all we and we probably will continue to have a really difficult time measuring and separating and machine and separating the yeah. religion as a, i think it's a, it's a continued to be, but what we have to make sure that we're doing is preparing people to live. and education is what does that. and so people should have the choice, but they should have informed choices to do what we want to do with their bodies.

we are a much healthier society when people are not solely led by the tree when they are also led by informed choices in education as to what to do with their body. then we don't get other people's rights to be able to do that. well, i'm going to give, i can say real quick, i got 20 seconds left to tell me that you want to respond. yeah, this country was predicated on the principle of the states having established sex of christianity. 8 of the 13 have that until the federal tyrants on the bench outlaw did in 1947. because like i said, the 2 foundational principles people shouldn't be having sex outside of marriage or killing each other. is the literally what both kristie out of the and chris and dumb are predicated upon. so we define health and opposite ways. desi, well, thank you to our play and we're going to ended on that one on that side of our thank you. we can choose conversation we just might at a later. so thank you. jessica k robinson,

health professional and do love with or johnston see of of your strategies and everything. gordon, host rules for retrograde pod cast. you know, the 3rd chapter of ecclesiastes says there was a time for everything and a season for every activity under the habits, including a time to be born. however, if we were to update the well known verse, i think there would be an added disclaimer that the only thing there is not a time for is a politician getting involved. maybe that's because politicians are towards the known for trying to gain control of a situation rather than let nature take its course. this is kind of how i personally feel in regards to contraceptives in i've yes, it's not a politician's job. the legislative science has been able to create a solution for problems which are not jeopardize the integrity of another fundamental rule of the bible. as we have put this generation into a precarious position. and republicans need to be careful when they start legislating both the preventative,

as well as the problem. this also allows the democrats to merge the 2 issues as one which will, which make for a very powerful weapon against the republicans and will be used as a valid us citizen. your 360 view of the news affecting you. thanks for watching the the honors flags on flowers, the p. r. k leader kim jong and braces. russian president vladimir was visiting the neighboring country for the 1st time and 20 point the head of his arrival. the