leads to jihad his death squads in syria, one of possibly the last independent arab state, in order to, or one of the last independent arab states in order to preserve the same system that protects is real. and it's this hypocrisy that needs to be shattered for palestine liberation to ever be achieved. people need to see palestine as part of a wider picture and use it as a prism for understanding us empire. i think by own, in my own work on palestine. that's how i was able to begin to unpack the contradictions the wider contradictions of us empire maximum and all. thank you. thanks a lot action and that's it for the show. i'll continue condolences to those very value k u. s. you on genocide, on monday i'll be joined by form and they do analysts posted to ukraine. kind of jack bo is just publish revelations about the october 7th attack when he's rel until then keep in touch with her with that social media. if it's on sense of new a country and to a child going undergoing tv on mobile dot com, george,

and you know that sense of going underground to monday. the the at the end of the 18th century britain began by illegal opium, afraid in china. this hard drug causing addiction and literally destroying the human body became a gold mine, or businessman from the foggy l. b. and however, the ruling chinese dream dynasty tried to resist and to stop the illegal trade, which provoked the wrath of the london business community. in 1840 without

a declaration of war, the english fleet began to seize and plunder chinese coastal boards sobar lee arm dead for lead, train chinese army was unable to provide adequate resistance. the jing empire was forced to hand hong, gone over to england, and open it sports for trading. the leads of the in 1856, branch of the united states joined in the robbery of china. the anglo french troops defeated the chinese occupied basie and committed an unprecedented robbery. destroyed and blundered the wealth of the un meeting you one palace. the defeat of the jing dynasty and the do obie and wars fled to the transformation of the celestial empire into a semi colony of european state. and started the age of humiliation. and the sale of opium took on collazo proportions and led to the horrible depths of millions of

ordinary chinese, the russian states never as tight as on one of the most sense community best. most all sense of the, in the system must be the one else holes. question about this, even though we will bend in the your, of the kremlin the media mission, the state on the russia to day and splits the ortiz food net keeping our video agency, roughly all the band on youtube tv services. for what question did you say from stephen twist, which is the

6 off of what go that you got to get better? you go to the hospital? yes. what you need to do to help you, hey, say, i mean what, what do you need to walk up the people that are drug addicts because going cold turkey is like going through withdrawals and a lot of these from school to withdrawal, giving them money were killed so you just gotta give them covered right now, alonzo as no one. not very good, but truly getting worse and worse every year. it has begun the

hi. i'm accepted and i'm here to plan with you. whatever you can do. do not watch my new show seriously. why watch something that's so different whitelisted opinions that he won't get anywhere else. welcome it, please do the have the state department, the c i a weapons, bankers, multi 1000000000 dollar corporations. choose your fax for you. go ahead, change and whatever you do. don't want my show stay main street because i'm probably going to make you uncomfortable. my show is called stretching time. but again, it's not. we don't want to watch it because it might just change the way and say the so the high of you need polarity. i velocity is, has actually colored out the, the will spring of state craft capabilities within the institutions of the american

political system. and it has essentially leaves off the vitamins of x and mary tom on the known in vietnam as the american war, the vietnam war lost it for almost 2 decades and drained in numerous countries. not any time we have now, and then you don't see it. now. what is all i'm empty? hundreds of thousands of american troops was sent to the country to back the south vietnamese on me. i got the american soldiers murdered resistors mercilessly burned down entire villages and spread dangerous

chemicals. and lee laid up day by all right. did the americans ever fully acknowledge what they did and on the vietnamese veterans ready to forgive? yes, yes, yes. and that's the way it's too late to but yeah, the so thank you so much for joining us here today. good afternoon. i'll say if i start with this new federal strategic partnership between rossa, i'm the d p. okay. how long this affects the balance of power in the region, in particular, on the korean peninsula. what signal does this send to the west and what we action could we expect from them?

what's going on in the northern east in asia and beyond currently is quite worrying in terms of exponential growth of military activities by the us, uh, and its regional allies. uh, the purpose of this is to folds uh, number one, to detour, china and russia. as may your adversary's, uh, as many believe in the us. uh, and unfortunately the in the region and number 2 to make sure that growing a growing interaction and cool alteration, not least between law school and feeling the young a would be, uh, you know, uh, and is loose upon which further the restrictive and low from the legitimate measures by washington would be introduced against russia. so this is an escal

attorney course that we see in a very old us full. and that the street to which you referred to earlier as are use of course, in a sense of product of this warning development. our 2 countries, the period key and russia, came much closer to one another. the speed to provide for mutual assistance. in the case of aggression, and so this provision, i would say, we send the message that this is a purely defensive arrangement, which our 2 countries concluded, and only in case of aggressive actions against any of the parties. the other side would provide the assistance as described and as provided for in the streets. so we look for better growing stronger security and interaction between our 2 countries and weak. i'm not doing these to threaten any one,

not to threaten republic of korea, of course, know the us for that case. but this is a message of our resolve. and our written is to stay firm on what we believe are the basics of international or international relations these days. despite olden or undermining activities of the collective west and its allies in the region. the lesson media was actively follow a line of input to visit to the d p. okay. many were right, seen that it was a signal that russia is losing an inquiry that needs a mid fi assistance from the dpi. okay? pointing out a full may. so the so called the painter axes. but so what, what do you think is the reason that the western media as presented the visit in this light, then on how true is it? hello, this is a rubbish. i mean,

we do not follow every single piece. every single article, every single, all pad in the mainstream west media. but we try to make sure that the, we know, uh the, the core of it and the message is completely failed and very wrong. and it's very essential elements. we are not doing this because we are a, we are pressed into it. we're not doing this because of, we want to use the situation in ukraine and yet around ukraine as a forensics, to create troubles for any of the western there is. so they'll say in the russian far east or north east in asia as such, we are doing so because we had driven by very well, acknowledged and recognized and considered national interest. both young,

young and russia felt this is the right moments to complete. a very important chapter in development of our relationship and the took form of these 3 d and the number of understanding send agreements that we concluded in the recent time. again, this was the very same us and each specialized set of lights that preached for decades for us and others that every nation is very free to change or chose it security arrangements. and this is exactly what happened here. the peer key and russia felt free to choose the security arrangement, which is not against a new one. it's for our deep partnership, better security, better predicted, predict the village seats, and protection if you wish,

against the excellence of our address or is originally uh they are eating it. i would say uh, full steam uh, efforts to create a very different bus chair threatening pushing compared to what was the case before they to achieve yet in stoughton, but has all viewed so that for a need to put native new, clear off and all that. well, what do you think was the purpose of this statement and what real actions may follow? well, the purpose is obvious. it's uh, the only purpose uh that natal currently, uh, you know, has the for itself. and it's the result that the of nato these days. and this is still threatening the russia to try to bring the russia into defensive to try to expose the rush out,

fulfilled the dangers. and all this is been done by the member states in natal, individually and collectively. and also through each international secretary of including currently our going as a secretary general young stolt and back we follow these trend attentively we, i'm not deter it. we are not impressed by of these kind of threatening messages, but we. 2 make our conclusions based on what we see on the ground, on how we feel about the ext show. redness of the nuclear forces, which and number of nato allies have under their command and several trust the need to members of the form so called nuclear sharing

activities, which is even complete contradiction with the requirements and obligations that these countries on the took on the nonproliferation treaty, so the so called new crit alliance essentially on the minds international security architecture. and the, these type of a messaging on these shows how you responsible the leadership of the international secretary at the nato, is these, these, the growing tensions in the world all shaping a trend towards sort of the resistance in the overall items race. and particularly a nuclear also, do you think that that's, that's such a trend will eventually lead to a direct nuclear compensation all or will common sense, pavel so i mean what actions is brought to taking to adapt the national security to, into the current realities. i think this is a very important question that you ask,

and many around are intrigued by what's going on uh in this area. i would refer to what the, my president said to a broad international audience in recent days. in particular, when he spoke before the media while visiting handily, a socialist republic of vietnam. but i will also tell you that uh our system provides for so to say to see your doctor know documents in this area. uh, the all what our team document being the russian military doctrine we share in red strokes describe situations which we all hope will be on the hype with basic old ones. when the resort to nuclear weapons is thinkable.

the 2nd tier document is so called uh, guidelines for state policy on nuclear deterrence. uh, and this document is, uh, i would say at detailing if i may use the word of the military doctrine describing more specifically words, what circumstances could be conceived of for eventually resort to nuclear option. and uh, as situation generally, and particularly in behavior of the us and nato is that whole towards russia becomes more and more strange and troubling. we have no other choice but to analyze how appropriate these documents and in particular the 2nd one. this is the

guidelines are given are given the circumstances and i cannot exclude that at some point in future, we may see as some adjustments that will not undermine the basics you know approach to eat. we are very firmly committed to the several times confirmed the idea that the nuclear war can never be one that should never be forts. and by the way, this formula was rec, confirmed by our president in he's a multi lateral statement some time ago. and also by his other russian officials, but uh you situations where the existence, so our state, our critical assets are a threatened and if someone wants them to destroy, we need to calculate,

we need to hedge against this risk. and this, and the electrical work as well. as some practical undertakings, like the very reasons exercise that was conducted in the cell, the military, the story district where i'll, i'm forces exercise for a practical operations with the non strategic nuclear weapons. that these things will send a message that we are serious. we are not threatening and you one, but we are prepared to go the full way if need be to protect our core and national interests. no one should underestimate our result. and the president, the president, was very articulate. and the quite straightforward in terms of these messaging connected where says, issued ukraine, an ultimatum that in order to join nato,

you claim must not exit the war, but emerge victorious. first of all. so why was the ultimatum issue? why don't we see a more dialogue from the west? why? why this on 64 or 2. i say out said that, did it not plan to take it to decide that it wouldn't. it wasn't going to planning . it wasn't planning to take you. quinn into nato in the 1st place. it's interesting that you use the word ultimatum in this context, and it is indeed an ultimatum. the west led by the us, tries now to use the interest of the leads that perform functional governments. even key you've to join nato, you know that to bring them in the situation or they have the only option,

the only choice. and that is to continue fight against russia until the very last ukrainian soldier uh on the front line. this is extremely tragic and it shows how uh some more than that, how completely arranged by the others. these people, ukraine are and this is a tragedy for ukrainian people. i will tell you that what we believe wouldn't be the right way out. was described on several occasions do written, including directly to the ukrainians. when our delegation embedded a gauge and set up the same table in 2022 kirsten bellows and subsequently in turkey. and they moved forward. they progressed a lot and the document which ship is now a common knowledge was the initial there was very close to what we

have set as objectives for the special media to be race. now, on june 14th president boynton, while appearing at the rest and foreign ministry, presented a comprehensive road map for as solution there. and in terms of natal, we stressed the president on this course. it is now and again that there is no way that russia can ever accept ukrainian membership in natal. so if anyone wants to bridge those 2 positions, the 1st step towards the direction would be inevitably not to allow ukraine to get more weapons. more legal levels met weapons, small, long range weapons, because this is a direct way to growing confrontation between moscow and need to be, be, must go and collect west. we do not by the argument that ukrainian government

decides for itself is completely guided or ruled and led by washington. so washington should understand easily. it's one piece. all this was going on should be stopped in terms of a visa scale or 3 actions. otherwise, we will come even further to the edge of the eddies. no one wants to, and that was going to bring russia and ukraine to the negotiating table. and do you see any immediate prospect for sites negotiations to happen on your 2nd question? unfortunately, no, i don't, i don't see at the moment any signs for a possible move towards the negotiating table. and we also saw these through immediate, i mean, met momentarily produce reaction by us and some

leading governments in europe on president boynton statement. as of june fourteen's, they are in the rejection mode. they want to present russia with feather can please, they do not believe with syria is when we are saying to them that playing with fire . they do not believe we are prepared to continue our flight and to stay firm on the objective as set forth by the president on this special needs population. each failure not on the, on the west and policies, but it's also a failure of their cognitive capabilities. they do not understand messages that, that being sent by our selves. it's mostly unfortunate. it's a big question, what type of leaders and what paper relates west has now as at, at the top of their pyramid. so to say,

we have said everything, what we believe is needed to get this negotiations. the stock started and the presidents also underscore the moment we see the movement towards this conclusion of the conflict fighting will be stopped and we stay firm on this message as well. i hope with will be heard, at least by some responsible figures on both sides of the atlantic, very probation associates, mr. sega republic, russell, deputy for a mess. so thank you again for your time. the. the,

the 1st 3rd of the 19th century was marked by the aggressive expansion of the united states. the american sought to seize as much territory for settlement as possible. ignoring the sovereignty of the neighboring states and the interests of the indigenous peoples in 1845, washington announce the annexation of mexican texas. and in march, 1846 american troops invaded mexico. however, mexico itself did not have enough means to effectively confront the enemy. besides, it was being torn apart by internal conflicts. the americans manage to turn the tide of the war in their favor. in september 18, 47, the u. s. army captured mexico city. mexico was horse designed

a humiliating peace treaty, according to wait to get lost 55 percent of its territory. vieques asian of the lands to the united states led to terrible consequences. bloodshed, genocide was committed against the indians in california. during the 1st half and 3 of the american ruled, the number of the indigenous people in the region decrease from 150216000 people. slavery which had been abolished in mexico long before the united states attacked was restored on the occupied territories. this will later become one of the reasons for the civil war in the united states themselves. nations like individuals are planted for their transgressions. we got our punishment. american president ulysses grant wrote about the consequences of aggression against mexico several decades later. the

a one year deduction attempt to collect x amount apache sat there for the show and then it will be a job loss and it goes into all of it is uh, international stuff is the template to supplement the setup button and not to mention in a thought someone did you lose it, ask you like that? if i said the media, i loved people, there's only 2 reasons. can you say? would you say that you need to be sure to be presented? it was for them. i didn't want to work it on stimulus. the industry only is it will less money will fall. sales really left. so should william farmer shots might give

us who we have court cost or to go? what decision did my name and what was that man? it was what was that ridiculous funds i put in the midst of them one today and bunch of deluxe. i've also left for an additional to settlement shows. those are pretty sure can was on page, did it for she's kim, those are the best do what i mean? there's a, there's a problem the the, the

of the american government loves to lecture other countries around the world about the rule of law. it happens literally every single day. but there's a great irony here because whistle blowers in the united states and especially national security whistle blowers have no rights. if you go public with evidence of waste, fraud, abuse, or illegality risk being prosecuted under the espionage that invited me for a cup of coffee some day. i'll tell you all about it. what ends up happening to national security professionals who do the right thing is that they lose their livelihood. they lose their pensions, and in many cases they lose their freedom and their families. whistle blowers keep coming. why? because it's the right thing to do.