a multi president, let's stop without police. is that spelled part of the ukraine security service claims is boiled up fenmont active as the storm the countries upon it mentioned off the common leadership and that's i made questions of a lot of news. the last piece election, tennessee as a stub, expired in may. 5th, since the thoughts of having had another world to really come on guys wake up and peace folks of the on the way to and the creating conflicts. and that's according to every non musician. and after this is raj, a war tax, and then these clues have interview with r t and the u. s. supreme court ruled the form of presidents have absolutely immunity from prosecution for official acts. come on, seeing all the case against donald trump, who was indicted for his conduct,

securing the 2020 electric the . are you watching? are these national, reaching you line from the russian capital i a maya called quite yet with the latest. now ukraine, secure with the service claims, it's for the pop by so code, civic activists to take over the nation's parliament. every move the car of leadership about comes. i'm a questions overlap means the last case legitimacy after his presidential tub officially expired at the end of may. there are yeah, my colleagues. soft. yeah. taylor discussed this with audi corresponded martin, uncle, sorry about the details are the following. that they were supposed to plan a protest that was the guys the premise to get themselves near that ukrainian parliament. apparently they even runs out a whole that could hold 2000 people that were twice recruit soldiers as well as private militia today. and this is a local public human head who apparently has

a history was fine to create confrontations and conflicts and problems for the ukrainian government, but not very successful, apparently didn't know very successful this time either. let's hear some more from the ukrainian security service and i'll place more be the way with them providing a funds longhorn feature under the guise of holding a so called national gathering. their attackers blend to announce the removal of the current military and political leadership of ukraine from power. then they hope to see if the billing goes. if you're holding their rado and blankets work and local citizens were charged by prosecutors for, i'll call them for a violent overthrow of the president governments. and as well as the constitutional order fits that, of course, that russians would be very happy about this, but they weren't involved. clearly. i do want to ask you, i mean, i mentioned obviously, so let's keep presidential tom came to an end at the end of may, there being discussions about his legitimacy council, those elections allegedly marshall know and move time. yes, that's what he claims,

which is something that actually brought him a pollutant called him out on out 1st we heard bought him or if we can sample ukraine, we really need to look into it's laws right now. because even if we were to continue with peace thoughts, who would we sign with? because legally speaking uh, zaleski is expired. he's no longer than ukraine and later. and also a lot of which is again a little bit later, literally 2 weeks later he looked in. so the ukranian constitution and said, well actually, since a crane, as we know is not a pen, a presidential repugnant is to get hold. now that either so you create in parliament that actually can extend its powers during martial law, not the preston. so it's actually the day right now who should be the permanent body responsible for making decisions. so once again, if we are to talk about peace of who would sign the document, it should be someone from the format either, but they insist that it has to be that i was getting a nice, interesting little power load. apply them up with mates. 2014, you just get to the bottom of the presidential time of the previously elected head of ukraine has expired, along with his legitimacy,

which cannot be restored by any tricks. the executive power in ukraine is once again as in 2014 is up and held illegally. in fact, it is illegitimate. to say more of the situation with the cancellation of the elections is an expression of the very nature of the real god of the current regime in cuba. which grew out of the cool of 2014, is tied to it and has its roots there before. and i guess these 4 active as tried to repeats as sort of a my that who what we saw there. but maybe this time it didn't work out because it has no cookies, no help from the west. who knows, but this group, it seems very low scale. not a lot of people involved in much ado about nothing really. but it does show the general dissatisfaction with the landscape because the accomplices came also from a tip, not only from the east of the country. so i will talk to you about this general dissatisfaction. i mean, is the landscape popularity seems to be declining, obviously a mid battlefield losses as well, where you knows,

just to go through if that collect use of this general mood and the country at the moment. well, all these videos that we're seeing with a forcible mobilization and not helping matters. and also you crate in seems to be losing their patriotism as fewer and fewer people wants to go and fight for this one. they don't even know what they're fighting for. at this point and that have this export meter. so there is no one that they can reach to. also, of course, we know about the sake up and ukraine's military top brass. they can seem to agree military speaking politically speaking. so it seems to be a very unstable time. plato's pause again, they show that zalinski and just one here. he lost 20 percent support and also 37 percent and not approve of his actions. haven't set that 70 percent want him to stay on till the end of this more. ok, fine. and hold the elections because your constitution actually allows the president to be changed for someone else to come in or let the putting out of the training upon them and being charged. then the while the school attempt has been

wanted. now the one, however, vice growing, right? one ukraine and member upon him and pointed out that you crazy, cannot make collapse my become the trigger of a new might and the comments potential has been exhausted and destroyed. the country has long stopped making money, will leave at the expense of the tech space of other countries, probably. and you might on a way to us even more ruthless and even more destructive. and the trigger for these will be a complete collapse. so they cannot make stability, which is only still survive in of the help of the west. ukraine is defective in default on its debt. now they have to ask for a subsidies, huge something like 60 percent debt forgiveness, which is just not going to happen. i think the will be the problem is that this is a very expensive games that are having to support you cream to the tune of separate off $1000000000.00 a year. and they running out of money. and i do not see where they are going to

come up with the something like trillion dollars, which is going to be necessary to rebuild the monroe ukraine. deep the western moya teeth, a few crew. now there is certainly very important agriculture production. but the problem is there, they have to integrate with the you and the you already have some technical to crevices and the farmers are rebelling against the system. now we see that mister mccaul is, has been humiliated in the french elections. and uh, he is not going to be able to provide support for you. grades that he could, which was merely political employed, to save himself physical, the future in france, which is very compromised in the united states. it's so good test at this point, you don't really know what's gonna happen when it gets to the search function as

far as a, as far as financial inc. lowe's get kind of, it's not function in the area of my colleague rachel ruble, this cost of the ukrainian crisis, wherever non musician an activist roger what as a founding member of the british rock band, pink law floyd. and he said the peaceful negotiations between ukrainian and forward is a lot to be put in all the on the way to end the conflict. and you can watch the full interview with roger waters care throughout the day on our international. well, here's that little sneak peak of that for the fall as the war and the ukraine as well, a pretty close they have since it started in february 22. so that's of the most interest to me. i cannot believe there are people in ukraine who still support the continuance of the war against rush or a new crime. i mean, everybody with hall for brain could see it was perfectly obvious that the people few credit and have an absolute right to live in peace. and hopefully some

prosperity to bring up the children like everyone else in the world. but i believe that because i believe in basic human rights for every one, all our brothers and sisters, russian, ukrainian, chinese, palestinian, let us not forget all over the world, irrespective of that misty or the religion of a nationality. so the soon as that we know, go negotiations and begin that between the russian federation and the government of the crate. and the better because this war has been complete since since the since the moment it started. i've been speaking about ukraine, figured the war should never have started. and if the west were prepared to negotiate and listen to both sides of the conversation, it never would have done. it is friendship that all those ukrainian lives have been lost for nothing. it's not like they're going to get a bad deal than they would have done 2 years ago in february 2022. when

a peace deal has been done, let us not forget and the extent of agreements. and it was covered by the us government, aided by bar, as johnson, who was the prime minister of incentives. and the time it is tragic biondo measure . so i'll keep my fingers crossed that they can call an end to it now. and i'm come to a reasonable conclusion to it that supports everybody's securities, not just in eastern europe, by the way, not just ukrainian security in russian scourge. but the security of the rest of europe as well. because the, the, the, the, the governments of many a e u countries, rap thing, this savers as hard and loud as they come to french, the germans, the english to. and it's insane. the thoughts of having a novel woe really come on guys wake up the

balance for is know to to while anava vladimir putin wants to talk, talk to him. now another topic discussed is a story of gee and assigned who was finally set free last week. rather what has, who has been one of the most vocal assign supporters for so many years believe that history shows west and the lead. don't care about the rule of law. a drill in his office, the magpie, and the head to the game keepers in the united kingdom, killed magpies, and they hang the dead bodies in the hedge as a warning to on the buds that might steal pheasant, said so whatever is there trying to protect the way that he was treated by both to you as some of the u. k. government is absolutely important. what they have done in the treatment of a song is they have freely and openly admits it to the rest as well that they don't give of faith for the rules of no. no,

the americans always told him about wounds fight still would have but lose faith international vice fluid. but what that means to them is you do as i say, or we're going to carry. basically those are the rules by which the, by roger you had a, we miss you, i say it on the. well that's, that's great. i've had to hear that you're a fan, a roger. you had a chance to visit us on it in prison last year. and can you tell us more about that visit? what did you see? what were, what were the conditions like that he was kept under? i was chatting to julian and he was, he was there and then we were talking and the kids for running around and going off and, you know, getting a packet of crisps is stella and bob julian and nice tools. and i said, you're looking good because he was, he didn't and he was smiling and i think he was glad to see me and whatever. and he looked to me in the eyes. anyway, i'm not i'm not good with

my hop. so philipo and not my match, of course, you know, you're banged out for $23.00 and a half hours every day. you've been in a nearly 4 years now. before that you will look tough in ecuador and embassy for 8 years and for why. because you told the truth about america, more crimes among other things. yeah. now what the risk said, the world freezing and what should we expect you done assigned to do next. all that took more and the phone interview with you. i don't want to watch it's on our to does across the us supreme court has ruled that former presidents have up city immunity from prosecution for official at commenting on the case against donald trump, who was indicted for his conduct during the 2020 elections of the events in the capital of july of generally 2021. the quote attempt to blunt the certification of

the election were also on the list of the federal criminal cases that now unlikely to proceed. the court also knows that that trump actions unrelated to his presidency may still be subject to persecution. at the bottom, administration, and campaign was quickly slow. i'm the ruling this 5, the courts facing stems from the nations professionals fucked up. but let's now cross live to talk show host, steve miles, but steve, good to have you done me every time. it's nice to see you here. now. the same for you, i court. thank you. the supreme court has rules that from a presidents can not be prosecuted for the or official actions, but whether i need details on the case, it gets from specifically as well. uh, the john roberts, the uh, the chief justice of the us supreme court, who wrote the opinion,

the $6.00 to $3.00 opinion and representing the majority. he did make some references, but i do want to, i do want to just say that there were kind of 3 sections to this that, that the president has absolute immunity from actions that are with in his constitutional authority. that he has presumptive them. unity for all official acts and no immunity for on official acts. the problem here is this gets pushed down to the lower courts with regard as you specifically, uh, alluded to be the case that trump is a charge with uh, with trying to uh, change the results of the 2020 presidential election or interfere with them. and also city and site, uh the uh, the capital a riots on january 6th. uh, that's the, that's a case that's in a court in washington right now. and basically,

what john roberts wrote was when the president spoke to his vice president, for instance mike pins and told the whatever, whatever he might have told them if he told them, go go to the capital and interfere with the, with the results or, or board george and he spoke to state officials and said, find me more votes or whatever he's alleged to have said that, that is not definitive uh that that goes back to the lower courts. they did not rule on actions like that. they also did not read on what he says publicly remarks he made public pay, which would relate to him at that rally before a bunch of those rally goers went to the capital building. he told them to go there peacefully, but he told them to go there. so a lot of the, the, the issues involved the charges involved in the case is that you, a low to are being sent back to the lower cord. so it define and decide, and it's going to take forever. and it most likely assures that donald trump will

not stand trial in that case before the november election. all right, but what are the chances that the case against some will fall apart because of this rooting in its entirety? i think it's, it gets so complicated and so, so it's so involved in. there's so many aspects to it and it's so wide open and open ended and on certain uh, you know, as it applies to the things i mentioned, in this case, there's a chance now that the judge in the case one said when, when referring to some of the january 6, the people who were found guilty that they must do something i'm, i'm, i'm, i'm paraphrasing here that they need to serve jail time. she's in a bama, a point d. so in this case, in washington discharge, i find it hard to believe she would dismiss all the charges, but it's going to revamp the case completely and only time will tell where it goes

. now, you know there's, there's also other cases that trump is involved with down in florida, the documents case in georgia, another case. so there's all kinds of implications for all of the cases involved. all right, now this could be a little tricky. now, according to this ruling, the posters is granted absolute immunity for their actions provided they stay in that constitutional authority. what can this be seen as a president to allow any president do what ever they want to do? because anyone can claim the well, i'm. 2 the president, and i'm doing whatever i have to do for the american people. a well, 1st of all, still a president could be impeached. so for president the something crazy is not in whatever wiley's in office of the congress going to peach him and kick him or her out. so that's, that's one safeguard. um and again it comes down to with,

it's good to come down to after the fact it's gonna come down to was it within his absolute congressional authorization. uh was it, uh, was it, um you know, something less definitive uh, as an official act or was it not an official act at all? you know, some people have said on the left in this country in the media. crazy stuff like all the and this came up with a the hearings before the supreme court. what if the president ordered so that those sealed team 6, a very elite force in our country to assassinate a political enemy? well, i mean, i've heard that brought up again today by people on the left that now he's a president, can do that. no, a president can't do that. that's not within his constitutional core authority. i mean, that's ridiculous. so i think i think it, it, it does grant. and so a lot of what donald trump and his attorneys requested. but it also does not grant a lot of what it does not say that he's granted total immunity from prosecution,

which is what truck requested. and it does not say, as also trump's team requested that a president must be in pitch ad removed in order to face prosecution. so it doesn't say that either. so trump didn't get everything you want, but it is a victory for trust, certainly. now, for the ordinary america, and how hard will it be to distinguish between a festival on, on the official presidential action? yeah, it's, it is very hard that on the average american, i think for the courts. i mean it's, it's going to be very difficult, very interesting going forward. you know, what, what i mean, the president could claim that everything is done, you know, within reason was an official, unofficial act. and then it's gonna be up to those who decide to decide, did he overstep it to is this official, is it not official? and again, the court decided, for instance, as i said,

that if the president speaks to the justice department in any capacity, that's an official act. but as if he speaks to his vice president or state officials, that's different. now what differentiates that? i'm not really sure you would think it's all official acts, but the court did make a distinction. so this is very involved and very intricate, very complicated from a legal standpoint and i'm not a lawyer. so i am a unit in effect, the average layman american, who has to try to figure this out, that it's, it's very complicated right now that are trump himself has endorsed the courts routing by saying that as a president, you need to have immunity. now the bottom campaign, on the other hand, has denounced it. one of the deputies claim that the supreme court gave from the keys to a dictatorship. what's your take on this? well again, i think, i think that's ridiculous. we've heard the majority leader of the senate called at the mca supreme court. you know, it's,

it's just sour grapes. it's ridiculous. this is not a dictatorship. again, the court was very specific that not everything falls under, you know, uh the, the, uh, the immunity and not at all, not by any means. and, and again, they did not decide they did not say, you know, trump go away with this. he could do what, what he did here is okay, what it did here. they're sending it back down to the lower courts to this side and, and go over it again. so this is not a dictatorship, this is the lab trying to score political points. the bottom campaign issued a fundraising letter, reportedly saying exactly what you just said, and we gotta stop trump, because he'll be a dictator and he'll do this and he'll do that. so it's all part of playing politics, but there's no doubt i'm not pulling this ruling. this is unprecedented, the whole case is unprecedented, and the roving is unprecedented. and it does give a certain degree of, of uh, of immunity, obviously to

a president of the united states, both as president. and for those acts that he commits as president after he leaves office, as far as prosecution is concerned. all right, now looking at the, the drama, the events, especially when he comes to allegations back and forth. now, what is by didn't be shooting himself in the foot by criticizing this routing as a well i, i well, yes, you know, way if you're talking about the possibility of him being prosecuted for the actions that he took in office when he leaves office, if that's what you refer to then, then, then sure, but guess what? they could criticize it all the what they could call it a dictatorship, a ticket to a dictatorship. the campaign could say whatever was, but he would still be under those roles and it would apply to him when he leaves office, no matter what he says about it. so why he's, he could, you could appeal to his left. his base is with his progressive base,

the democratic base now and still benefit from this. if there ever charges ever come up against him when he leaves office and he'll still be benefiting from it at that point. all right, we have to leave you here. now talk show host, steve miles, but thank you so much for your insights on this. thank you. my pleasure. thank you . great. now let's come to the rough uh, ukraine conflict. a lot of his last key has demanded. the us, like you train use american weapons just tried deep into russian territory, the landscape planes and that's needed to improve air defenses as the questions, the efficiency of the us be trip myself that are being supplied to key f. the battle numerous a little difficult to con patriot missile system or any other way of defense system cannot fight against live bombs. and it will allow you to win in the short term. but in the long term, the russians will prevail, that but when do the long range solution? i guess the airfields where russia has military planes that use glide, pharmacies,

eastern. we currently need an opportunity to launch attack comes missiles, with deep inside watching territory at the comes to mazda. lansky has said that there will be this simply never be enough picture of myself to present ross and glad bombs from hating the targets. and that's how the after his repeated claims that us patriot missiles would make sure that you crania and cities are protected. and key of was ready to get even a relatively small amounts of weaponry. so we need to add 0 to are the assistance. and today we talked about how to speed up the delivery of paths or of systems to ukraine. at least 7 passers are necessary for our see this to be safe? yeah, more that was because of the ship was that can i can tell you that in order to cover, recreating completely, it is desirable for ukraine to have 25 featured systems with 6 to 8 batteries. of course, as the last case denied,

came weeks after the u. s. gave key of approval to use american weapons dislike russian border areas. and that green light was followed by ukraine using us made a comes missiles to strike the city of sylvester pole in cry. media for civilians including 2 children were killed in that attack, or the spot repeated incidents of keeps forces, progress thing, so that in the areas, a number of nato countries of all right, the allowed ukraine to use the weapons to strike inside of russia. but russian military expert to alexander, step on off was the says that the weapons supplied by the west have only limited efficiency. i expect that so festival, all these types of armaments won't be able to pass on to me. i'm from learned zones, and so will be destroyed in the terminals will be destroyed and the luggage will

logistics zones. every time you type all fall out of my mind, control the unit countries. when it comes to the trunk lines, we see the highlight. promoted media campaign that shows all the attractiveness so such kind of game changes on the from fine. but we already saw how, for example, laptops being destroyed on the throne plan using jazz, ppv, drones, all and to time systems for different types of abuse files. uh and uh, surely will such types of arguments. yes. if we are talking about some local, local, or situation on the phone line, they can make some damage. but in general, when we are talking about the quantity of their preparation, all the units that have to operate the system, surely there are

a lot of problems. so you originally have a very uh, big problem. so if we have talking about people, uh, the engineers can use such type of our romance on here in russia, one passing has been killed and truly enjoyed, including a child as a heavy storming golf, the russian city of saint petersburg now peter circulating on social media shows a storm in full swing with trees and road signs. the strolling around and sheets of metal torn from roofs. multiple costs have been damaged with the green tower, the construction side collapsing. due to the heavy rain and strong wind st. petersburg approval airport has been closed with plains being redirected to other airports and you can get for the details of all the stories were following an odd. com. i'll see you again. that's about the

we are going away from the colonial. the infrared is that the indian system had by revenue as an oil is different than you were the and everybody who comes to me and the sides. bye bye. hello and welcome on from cheques. not ever changing the focus now more than ever is on india. on visual, we bring your unique and establish guest and their views on indian culture, politics and history. this week, my guess is one of the most i provided for them in the law as in india. please welcome mr. sedation, banish and now scribe. so they can verizon, wonderful,

wonderful, thank you very much for joining us that you have from the hardwood. yeah. and you came here. your father was a charter. yeah. yeah. and which department the department in the government. okay . and you came here. i came in and 1980 g. yeah. in 1982 i competed for the call completion of 4 law students that were 75 north cities in dias, or the one of the top one, the law students, all that you have seen. it was connected with about tons of different day, incidentally, who use your license subject as well the to just looking for the competition where from i'm back me just as of the one bad court in the next scene had judge me. so they spotted me and visit the wider to come over to bomb. be able to set you up with somebody. so that's how i landed the i joined us. you know, i got rid of mister knight. hm. i mean like, so i the industry my just and after about 68 months i joined.