when he was quite remarkable, he became a real champion for the establishment of the state of israel. it and then what was palestine then? and also to criticize the book, the book, those adult administration for not doing more to help the jews jewish people. and you'll have worshipped at the shrine and frank of most don't. one is one of the earlier telling americans to serve. and congress very got say, i think you've, maybe that's part of your, the legacy that's been passed on and zeros that squads lot to rumsey, but we'd palestinian american journalist on that as will all be published on chronicle. to discuss this further many thanks for joining the program, it's good to see. so these words from nancy below see what was palestine? how did they talk with this narrative but as well was established on, on claims line, business and admission of souls that it's a misconception and i, it is, it isn't a mission and i am, i'm pretty sure the she must have regretted saying that because that is going to be

going down in history books that nancy pelosi has admitted that the state of israel was established on a lab that was cooled palestine for us. palestinians, by the way, it is still called pa this time. but what's also interesting is that kind of the, the warm reception of the, the host when m, s, and b, c, you know, the kind of, this kind of emotive reference to how i got to see and, and you know, that, that particular option was it, as a as if it's both below c and a who's are living in a completely different dimension and completely unaware or oblivious to the judas side and god. so many people are willing to hold the cost of the palestinians . and what the international court is, nobody thinks was the extermination of dependents, denny is. i mean, if this interview took place, it's

a before october 7. 1 can understand to some degree that many are still living in this kind of imaginary then space in which as well as the greatest democracy on our it's in god's, you know, a gift to humanity. but now, now to speak about the establishment of that is, will that very israel, that is exterminating dependents to me. it kind of to me, it was so much pride in the legacy of her father and admitting again that the land was indeed caused by this going. yeah, another interesting take away from the interview was went below, says her father had to convince the roosevelt administration to support plans for a jewish state. what do you think washington support is rarely so unwavering. now. well, it is so and we bring for the very reason that nancy below see by the way this is not the 1st time she speaks and you know, a blonde, her, her credentials and terms and her family credentials in terms of loving and

supporting as well from the very, very start, i mean, she comes from a powerful democratic family. they've always kind of lived in, in wilson plenty, and it's always been a back hour. and that kind of answers your question and a sense is about power. me a side thing with the palestinians as far as american congressmen. it's not really something that is good. i can't guarantee the elections or, you know, sustaining of their chairs and congress or elsewhere, much rather kind of totally the line of a pop particularly about. but also other approach as well, lobby groups in washington dc. that's how power can be achieved and that's how power can be sustained. then that's precisely why washington continues to side with is well, even when the entire world has to the side of the palestinians, said enough is enough. do you think we might see some changes in base? a close partnership with the us selection is coming up perhaps. if a new president comes into power,

do you think this might change the best partnership but to enjoy and i, i want to hope so. i hope so. in fact, we have already seen signs of that happening in the, in general elections. and then the british elections to some degree, meaning that, you know, this kind of die hard loving supportive is, will, is not a guarantee any more of, of having, you know, of guaranteeing one's relationship to power. different example. in particular, what do you see kind of a for right, of, you know, central movement kind of taking over and pushing against the is what 80 narrative and they have been told that's going to be a group liability, but it wasn't a tool. well, the americans in the following that line, i think it all depends on the power of american civil society. the continued sort of directly with the palestinians, the coverage of sorts, and congress people of and,

and many and independent independent media. but they really do hope. oh, by the way, for america sick as well, to have that more of a weakening at last into the link themselves for me is will design a sloppy and design this power in america. when it comes to the here, k, which of course pay the critical vote and creating the land tensions between israel and palestinian and palestine. what other countries were involved in? what role could they play in ending this conflicts with seeing right now? you know, honestly, my hope is on the global cells as far as international solidarity at this concern, it doesn't mean that i am not placing any hope on on the north west, some countries and so forth. but if i, if i do speak about change in that part of the world, it definitely going to start with civil society is with ordinary people. i mean look what happens though with norway, ireland islands always been solidly on the sides of the palestinians. but as of

late spain, in norway and other countries who are taking unprecedented action, i mean, what do you have the, the deputy prime minister of spain of says in a speech in what she told somebody is willing to do this. talking garza says, from the river to the sea, but this thought it would be for you. i mean, this is the language that my generation. in fact, no other generation has been so many or to the years. so change is indeed happening, but we want this change to happen fast enough so that there is a critical mass. there is a paradigm shift. otherwise the just sort of dependent studios will continue on hindered. like i said, less for speaking to us today. we've been talking to around super weird published in american journalist on that as of the palestine chronicle. thank you. the f b i has. why did this so talk sivitz a is to include the home of a former presidential adviser on c o of the us census for the national interest. demetrius line is currently

a political program host at russian channel. one symes moderate today, plenary session with the russian president vladimir putin. it was in petersburg, international economics form in 2023. they both have reported that bestbuy agents came to his estates in virginia on tuesday morning. and we moved on specified items from the, the intelligence agency were turned on thursday, f b, i officials declined to disclose days although he but the searches with portals arrived and talked of an ongoing investigation. pharmacy was abroad at the time of the search as total and said that he was not informed about any of this by the us so far. t's i am aware that such a situation is happening. i have no information from us officials. no one has notified me of any claims from us law enforcement agencies or another reason targets of the f. b. i is fully un weapons inspector and we're tired. the west between for intelligence officers score and ritz um, who's down lot new or crime was rated in early august,

several boxes we've been disclosed. concepts were removed from vs property during the f b. i raid the agency reports and we purchased a warranty, claiming with the it has violate to be foreign agents registration acts and is under investigation before the rate which i was pulled off, a plane headed to russia in june as is possible. it was confiscated, it was scheduled to participate as a guest speaker at the 2024th. and the piece is buck international economic forum as well. that's plus live to the subject of the inquiry. now, when we, you and what the specs are on the phone with us marine corps intelligence office, a spoke with mr. rates are good to see you today. um, could you tell us to, to, to cuz through what happens where, where he, when the rate took place and what was your initial reaction i was at home. i literally just got back from work in my dogs, and i had a full plate of, of scheduled interviews to uh to do um and it had

a half finished article on my computer um about improving us russian relations. apparently. that's the biggest crime in humanity nowadays. and then there was a knock at the door, it was 2 f, b i special agents. they indicated they wanted to talk to me about concerns over my activities. i said specifically what they said, well, it's about the for an agent registration act. and i said, well, i'll be more happy to talk to you out here, but i'm not letting you in my house. and they said, well, actually we are coming into your house and they presented a search warrant. and at the moment of presentation in my house was swarmed by 20 plus uh, you know, armed agents and they executed their search warrant uh, the search warrant specified electronics. um, my computers, my cellphone, um any data storage devices i had flash drives, things of that nature. but as you saw, uh, they took far more than that. they uh,

they already have coming out. that's how i was casually dressed with the then they go montoya, a t shirt that my wife gave me for my birthday. um. but um they, they took uh over a dozen boxes containing the archive. material for my time is a, uh, as come weapons inspector. uh, this archive is of course that which empowered me to speak out against the us case for work. um, uh, to show that united states was lying about its claims that iraq had weapons of mass destruction. of the archive is not classified, it's already deemed been deemed to be unclassified by the f b i n e c. i a back in 2000 when the api i was trying to prosecute me for espionage because of the information in this archive. but this time they took it, they claim that they have to review it once again. so i just want to point out that uh, i know full well was in those boxes that they took,

they took the electronics at the search warrant, authorize them to take. but they also took tens of thousands of pages of documents, the only archive of its kind in the world that proves the united states case for war in iraq was a lie, it made, sees that now. so what they're going to do with it. we shall find out what's been going on since then with regards to the cases. anything new occurred in the last week? for instance, you know, nothing. i mean i, i await their, their response. i told them i was very cooperative with them. i have nothing to hide, i'm not a for an agent. i don't take instruction from the russian government. i don't work on behalf of the russian government. i'm an american citizen who speaks out because it's my duty responsibility as an american citizen to hold my government accountable for what it does in my name. i'm a working journalist. i am a, a, an outside contributor to r t. i am an outside contribute to split next,

but i'm also an outside contributed to a whole host of other, you know, a journalistic outlets in the united states and around the world. that's what the independent journalists do. i have my own podcasts. i appear on other broadcasts. i period as a guest on a number of news programs including this one. um, i do so willingly on my own solution. and this is what i told them of their, their barking up the wrong tree. but they weren't specific. they, they, they alluded to, unspecified concerns about my behavior that they said could be considered to be violation the 4 digit registration act. i repeatedly asked them, what exactly is your concern? we can address it. we can talk about it, they wouldn't get through. so what i have done is i've sent a letter to the head of the 4 digit registration act enforcement unit, the department of justice. i'm saying that i request this information in writing so that i can evaluate what the us government concerns are and make

a decision at that point in time. what my next move should be. should i retain council right now? what am i retaining council for? the government has been committed to anything they've committed. they've executed a search warrant, but sure to finally the junction to re the, to reverse the search for it, which would be a futile effort. there's no legal action that i can do. i'm in a waiting mode and so i await the government's response. how concerned are you about this? think that's the positive direction this can take i think anybody who said they weren't concerned with the, you know, a couple dozen, the armed f, b i, agent, storm in your house with a search warrant would be a full. but i know what's on those computers. i know is on my cellphone, i know it's on the storage drive and there is no evidence of a crime. there's no evidence of collusion between myself and the russian government . there's no evidence of a cobra relationship. there's no evidence of me taking direction. there's nothing on the computers that relate to any wrong doing in relate to any wrong doing at all,

but especially relationship to the fort agent registration act. so i am hopeful that the f, b, i, the department of justice upon review of the material that they seized will make the proper determination that i am not in violation of the 4 digit registration act and, and will return my property to me and allow me to get on with my business as a, as a journalist, unhindered as a bit of reaction in the western media. a well surprising there's been, uh silence amongst the main stream media. and i would just send this message out to every member of the main street media there. but for the grace of god go you. this is a frontal assault on free speech. this is a frontal assault on the free press. the department of justice and the f. b i is attempting through their misguided enforcement of the 4 digit registration to have to define what journalism is, what constitutes journalism. there's a chilling effect on free speech. and if every journalist in america doesn't stand

up, understand that eventually they're going to come after you and seek to silence you . this is about the defense of the constitution, plain and simple. you don't have to like me, you can hate me. you can disagree with everything i'm saying, but the key thing about free speech is that disagreeable speech. it's that it's free speech and the best antidote of speech you don't agree with is not suppression, but coming up with better speech, better ideas. and the us government is not cable. and the last thing i'll say is that the 1st amendment and derek g's, americans write a free speech and a free press. hugo, black and 1971. the justice of the supreme court said that it's imperative, it's paramount in the execution of free speech and a free press. one of the paramount things is to hold governments accountable when they seek to deceive the people about wars. about the danger going to worse. the american people are being actively deceit by the united states government. and this

deception is being perpetrated and encouraged by a, a compliant mainstream media. and it's only through the actions of independent journalists, alternative media, people such as myself, that we, we can challenge this. and so literally what's happening right now is the epi, i, the department of justice, is seeking to suppress the challenge to the ongoing deceptions carried out by the united states government about what's happening in ukraine, about russia. and the danger of this is that if we don't get to grips with reality, if we don't seek to try and improve relations with russia, we are on the slippery slope that hits in one direction in one direction only. and that's nuclear war. and that's why i speak out, that's why i do what they do to try and stop this word is actually what the free press is all about. have you had any reaction from the post public so know you have a strong following. i think given you plenty of, suppose i got

a tremendous support from the, from the public at large, from the alternative media community. i think everybody recognizes a that what i do, i get you don't have to agree with me. i respect everybody's right. not to, i'm a somewhat abrasive personality. i take very strong positions and i might rub people the wrong way. you don't have to agree with it, but you have to support the process. you have to support the process of a free, a free speech and of a free press. and there are many out there who do support be it's some don't to say what the us government is doing is wrong because people are rallying behind because, and i'm hopeful that you know, we will reach some sort of critical mass that a way you can just adjust the person and the f b i to the fact that they've picked the wrong marine and the wrong fight that they're not going to win this one. and the best thing to do is let just as prevail by recognizing the supremacy of the 1st amendment and the inadequacy of their arguments. i will also covering the story scholars about demetrius on as

a former presidential advisor and see with the us census of the national interest. he's also just on his property. so as by the f b i. now he's a russian kind of one public political program host. do you think s b i. so it says that people are associated with the rush, which is going to become more common, a 100 percent. i mean, the one thing that the epi i focused on is an article, in my case, was an article that i up i published on my own sub stack, in uh, february of 2023, about russell for the, in the dangers of russell for the up and that article made extensive use of it as a written by russian and bassett, or, and it totally anton off. and i was introduced to this essay in a meeting i had in the russian embassy with russian diplomats. and we had a long discussion about russell for being the danger russell for you. now i want to point out that it's not illegal to go to the russian embassy or speak to russian diplomats and i did so on my own volition, i requested the meeting. i wasn't being directed by the russian government or my

russian intelligence, the handlers to do this. and i was doing it to inform them about an upcoming trip to russia to say that i know that i'm a former intelligence officer. i know that you might be concerned about my motives, but when i go to russia, my motives are simply to engage in a dialogue. that was the purpose of it. they were receptive to be, you know, giving them a heads up that i'm coming to rush it. then we talked about the problems of us russian relations. and as a journalist, i pursued the issue of russell phobia. received information incorporated into an article that i published fully source people know where the information came from and this is what they're focused on. so the fact is, any american journalist who engages with russia about russia in order to inform the american public about russia, is deemed a threat by the department of justice and the federal bureau of investigation of

the last thing the united states government wants at this time is for the american people to be fully informed about the reality of russia so that they themselves can discern on whether or not rush is a threat worthy of the policies currently being put forward. is russia such a threat that the nighted states needs to continue to promote a proxy war with russia using ukraine as the foil to support a literal invasion of russia encouraged. these are questions that every american has to wrestle with and should wrestle with. but you can only do it when you are empowered with knowledge of fact based knowledge. and we know that the us government just to give you an example, has admitted declassified intelligence information about russia about you created it, knows is wrong. it knows it's wrong, but they declassified and release it to the media anyways, because they want to get ahead of the russian narrative. they want to manipulate the american public by deceiving the american public. this is the duty of

a free press to expose the deception and lives of the government, the american government. you know, when it comes to update the potential of where it's not. mission business is just as you go black of the supreme court referencing to 1971, a decision in the new york times versus the united states. this is the duty and responsibility of every american. and yet the justice department, if the guy appears to be trying to criminalize this duty anyway, you mentioned that your claims encasements a ca skip that one involvement date that we us may have had in the operation the system assessment that i can't see that i'm empowered with specific knowledge, but very when i speak to, again, the importance of having a dialogue with russians. when i speak to russians, who are involved in the cruise corporation, from what they have gathered from an evaluation of the personnel of the equipment,

etc, that they've captured and destroyed interest of this, this amalgam of ukrainian military units. 18 in total. so far, maybe more coming in it was organized and trained to the most modern nato standards using communications capabilities, incorporating artificial intelligence into their scheme of maneuver in a way that ukraine has never done before in a way that is 100 percent reflective of current nato doctorate. how did this happened? did you train invent this on its own or didn't receive this training if you receive this training for what purpose? and it appears that the purpose is to support this 1st operation. this is a military operation that has a specific goals and objectives that are linked to the overall strategy for ukraine of prevailing in this conflict against russia, which is of course,

the strategic objective of the united states. so i believe that it's 100 percent certain that the united states and nato were behind the cursed offensive. of course, we'll, we'll learn more as the russians be backed as offensive is captured, more people catching more equipment, gather more information, and are able to more effectively brief. i'm not just the russian public, but the global public. this is an issue of global importance. if i'm right, then nato in the united states invaded rush. i just want to say that one more time . so the audience understands the enormity of what i just said. if i'm right, nato in the united states invaded russia. there is no more dangerous scenario than that. it leaves only in one direction, and that's nuclear war. and that is a direction that nobody should be wanting to hit. before i let you go, i'd like to pick your brain about these reports of a private u. s. military cool cooled full with all this evasion where there's been fighting

for cape the calf regime and don't boss since the beginning of the special military operation, but also heavy losses in west and you print in 2022. they set the war, they've re, i'm noticing task off the wasting team dollars on behalf of israel. now, washington is this. they don't have boots on the ground in ukraine, but doesn't they screw signal otherwise? what it signals is that um, the american government, at a, at a minimum is turning a blind eye to personnel who have received very specific training from the united states government during their service and the military very specialized training. and they are now taking this training and seeking to use it in support of ukraine. this could not happen without the us government. the leasing. okay. um, but i think that it's worse than that. i think that we know, for instance, that the c, i a special activities staff, special mission center is involved in supporting your training intelligence

organizations and a pair of military fashion to wage this kind of conflict. are these people park parcel of a c i a effort? are they uh, independent element. be managed to be a contract vehicles by the department of defense. we don't know, but i will say this with absolute confidence. they would not be allowed to do what they're doing in ukraine today without the permission of the united states or anything. so speaking to us today, i really appreciate your time with things open to for me, you and weapons inspect to inform us marine corps intelligence officer. scott, right? so thank you. thank you. cuz you want to get paid on all the international web back in just a few minutes with some people. the hello and welcome to across the board. here we discussed some real in the

russian states. narrative as tired as i'm one of the most sense community best most i'll send send up the same assistant, must be the one else calls question about this, even though we will then in the european union, the kremlin mission, the state on the russians cruising and split the ortiz vote net keeping our video agency roughly all the band on youtube, the payment services for the question, did you speak to a request, which is the

the have gave us then has attracted conquerors attention from time immemorial. in the 19th century, the british empire decided to subjugate that century. the british view the afghan lands as the northern gateway to india. and wanted to turn them into an obedient province, trying to predict the independence. the mere of a dentist in those blue homage turned for help to russia waste. the rate is

considered their deal political adversary. this was the last straw for london. britain declared war on the half gans in august 18, 39. the invaders occupied couple and brought their henchmen to bower. the invaders brutally suppressed any resistance, thus, is dully, they slaughtered all i have gained man who had reached adulthood and raped hundreds of women. seeking to humiliate the muslims of 18. 41. a general uprising against the british yoke began debris. it is under the command of general elton stone last couple and started to retreat. only a few out of the $16000.00 invaders who had begun their march from google made it to the british position only in jello. but the defeat of the royal army caused enormous damage to the prestige of the british empire throughout the world. the victory of the afghan people became the most important event in the history of the arrest people's resistance to the colonial list. it just failed the racist smith of

the year at the inn invincibility the beautiful sun soaked vineyards and nestled among some rest. picking the rolling hills as a gentle breeze comes off of the surrounding sea comic imagery of french one country. but this is not from as we are in a coupon at russia on the black sea. where recently they've got the serious about making some world class one you cry and never transition to now of the ninety's coyote politics of the not just continued or the what all the way for the yeah. of course to go see the that the trying to have at that never had a patient tries to come and take some stability. is the power all site the

the a lot shopping. oh and then yet, cuz side of play instead of ukrainian missile strikes, moving to people that i didn't know the lesson here have suffered losses all day. but $2800.00 soldiers since installed all but pro pulled that and causing it to cut. it comes as most goes presidential a says ukraine would never have been to the interruptions parent fees without the green light from was a full my job and it's $5.00 shape. plenty of ukraine, i'm tired. and what in cook cruz? sorry, with a terror attack on.