the idea of a tank song, laza, as well as old versions of the southern city of hon. you as a once considered a save son to flee from the homes. an estimated 90 percent of gauze population has been displaced since the war. a ruptured in october of last year. civilians have access to only 10 percent of the region. despite the terrifying members. haldeman member, i have a daughter lieberman as hold on israel to conduct the completing below. ok. the gaza cutting off all the food will also and medical supplies should we stay? know we should do the opposite completeness engagement coast. all the crossings noble supplies no more to notice this of the no goods we have already taken on this crazy process called this engagement. we need to close all the crossings, no more to no goods. the west wind is also being top of the headlight idea. full

says this, this from the to call him a refugee campuses. the off them off of an s like an hours long re the left. 3 people dead. that's according to passing authorities says that some of the so the west bank has seen a surge in why this really falls is conducting in day me, raise the often the gum bottles of the local policies. meanwhile, the head of the is what a security agency sent. i mean that's, it's a prime minister and the thing, yahoo does it him to address a jewish settlers who engage in violence in the west bank on the hill top use phenomenon long ago became a hot bed of violence against palestinians. i never agreed to the term nationalist crime. it isn't the crime because it's the use of violence to create intimidation, to spread fear that is terror. it's not a nationalist crime and certainly not national because it challenges national security. i'm convinced that this needs to be one of the governments main goals

before it's too late. yeah, i was wondering somebody thought about member of the cast. if he said these running golden heights, palestinians, more like tears for it citizens. well, most of the stand that the current situation easily is not only the destruction this sort of ation the genocide the ice cream doesn't give you the like the government's intention to be in the, in the as we know. nathan, y'all was, if i mean the step is not even interested in stopping gates in order to save these way and the hostages and saved lives even of subjects equally fast. okay. but as pinions even if it also means keeping you families, because the government 8 buddies, pinions more than they love these ladies. so the ethnic cleansing that goes on in the west bank, alongside domestic green garza, in the process of damages like poker into a fascist dictatorship. or those are the bottom of the so called subjugation plan,

or which side of the smoke, which is the meanest or finance or the or so, i mean is that within that mean is through the 1st it fall, she's places that really believes in the they show sabrina's, the of the jewish, the group to the my confidence in i raise, redeemed a problem in an outside that bottle. i mean, unfortunately, at the moment this voice is quite relaxing, the mileage not in wake as well. but rosa, this is always good to have the company all come great place to go and check out what's the latest update? so i will be back in about 27 minutes of the top of the hour. we'll see you then the hey rick sanchez here. this is direct impact and this is what we're going to be talking about. they have unfortunately turned us into a spoiler and,

and we don't want to be as boiler, we want it to when we wanted a fair shot. our k juniors running made explains how the democrats pushed him away and apparently into mister trump's loving arms. you're gonna hear it for yourself. we're gonna let you see that. i'm rick sanchez. let's do this. the right r f k junior. obviously, his uncle was the president, his father would have been president, had not been shot, a prominent member of one of the most famous democratic families in us history. he's going to quit the race and possibly endorse donald trump and be here, who's running may tell it. it's happening because he's been treated so poorly. she says by the democratic party, this d

n c aligned pack that was created specifically to take us out has spent millions of dollars to take us out. they have unfortunately turned us into us boiler and, and we don't want to be as boiler. we want it to, and we wanted a fair shot or at the dnc, made that impossible for us, they have a band shadow band as kept as off stages. manipulated polls use lothair against us, sued us in every possible se, leave even planted insiders into our campaign. to disrupt and to create actual legal issues for us. so let's talk about this obvious question. will he actually endorse trump? and what's he going to get for doing? so these things always have a price, right? there is talk of a cabinet position, but it's not firmed up yet. why is the out?

why is the money time and a dropping poll numbers, possibly? who's? who's you're going to really help in this? right? the obvious answer would seem to be donald trump, because he's going to endorse donald trump, but it ain't automatic. you know what i mean? it depends on how he sells it and how mr. trump sells that maybe. perhaps during their announcement, remember, his followers tend to dislike both parties. right? so convincing them to make that job is going to be kind of hard. and it may even help harris. because aligning with trump could anger some of his followers who don't want to go along with anybody. this is, this is a, this is quite a pickle here. you know, manila, this whole thing is probably going to work itself out. it's, it's going to be fun to watch it. now. what are your thoughts? oh, absolutely. it's going to be fun to watch. but to nicole shanahan's point, she's absolutely right. the, the democratic side of this, you know,

political show that we have here in the united states has been proven over. and over that while that particular party stands, they say for pro choice, when it comes to women's rights, they're not so pro choice when it comes to the ballot box. and we've seen how they've treated our f k junior, which is why he jumped ship. they were not going to allow that, that we, if we can call it that of the democrats to actually be successful or have a real chance at being on the the dump the dnc ticket in the primaries because we didn't even see a primary for the democrats so to her point, she's absolutely right. she's pulling the veil back on how it's actually done. but what was that he has gone independent. the numbers have gone down rick steadily and decline since he left the party. but a lot of the polls do show that if people were, were poached, we'll call it that because i don't believe people are, you know,

should or have to vote one party or the other. but if they are radically, if he were poaching from anybody, he'd be mostly poaching from trump voters because the people that are on the democratic side have already drank the kool aid and they are going to vote blue no matter who. so the, the party he would have been hurting would have been the republicans in this case. it's donald trump. so for him to go and potentially, we don't know, potentially, you know, square of a deal behind closed doors somewhere. then, you know, that's kudos to him and that's, that's great for, for kennedy and the mission that he has and whatever that is. and so i think if he backs trump, i think it'll actually help trump because it will bring the people back to the republican party. we disagree. i think he's going to end up having absolutely no effect a minimal effect, or maybe even going the other way. and helping harris, because so many of those people are going to look at it as i don't, i didn't, i, the reason i was going to go for you is because i didn't want to pull that up. so

don't tell me what to do kind of thing, but we'll, we'll say single say, hey, they hate harris more than they hate trump. i think those, those particular motors. okay, very starting to be some real bickering in the democratic party about how president joe biden was treated on the 1st night of the election. this is new. the president was supposed to give his final ba bye in prime time, around 8 or 9 o'clock. the guy is it's, it's really getting late now. so let's wrap up the other speakers and bring out joe . please welcome, congressmen jim tribe or raphael warnock kathy hope all alexandria gusio to see me. jasmine crockett, chris and i want to talk with you for just a few minutes. the still going on? no disrespect to chris, cool. but chris, boone's midnight mom has got to get to bed and you know,

who else has to get to bed for the love of god. let's hear from biden, please welcome ashley bye. it's good. you know, everybody's talking about it since it happened. he didn't even get on stage until like the prime time audience was gone and they had all gone to bed. so most americans didn't even get to see the prison united states. what is you know, farewell speech? well, what was it done on purpose? democratic convention, official say it happened because it was just too many long ovations and the night went long. funny how that didn't happen when mister obama store from when mister clinton spoke afterwards. the fact of the matter is a democrat, the party seems to be done with mister button. and while it may make sense from a political standpoint to try and win the election to do so, you know, to do it that way. just seems a little harsh. you know, just a little harsh,

and here's nancy pelosi, by the way, she finally got nailed down on this thing. couple of the desktop or, and what's your name over and cnn sat her down during the convention, and after did she pushed by them out of the race? it does seem like there's some residual bad blood or resent man, and i'm wondering if you've spoken to him and, and, and what your responses to that. sometimes you just have to take a punch for the kiddos and he made the decision for the country. my concern was not about the president was about his campaign. as you, as he has seen, the exuberance the excitement that has come for us in our country. i just did a event for one of our members and illinois, eric parents, and today, immediately he got 1100 volunteers into his campaign. as soon as that announce, nobody is questioning the fact that that the democratic party seems much better

positioned right now than it did for weeks and 2 days ago. there's no question about that. a former speaker, hello. so you're why we've been talking about it. yeah. why we've been talking about this thing, you know, what's interesting is that she didn't go after, but, and she went after his campaign, isn't that the same thing? i'm just curious. but why god, rick, it's it, gosh, it's, i mean, again, it just shows you that the d and c machine just choose you up and spits you out when you are no longer useful to it. in this case, biden was the poor spat out full that they use for a couple of years to achieve their means was to get, you know, donald trump, out of office, that would be in goal. and he was the means. and i guess, you know, poor old joe and, and whatever 40 year friendship he thought he had with nancy pelosi that yeah. door . yeah. as well. i like to there's no such thing as loyalty. well, in vitaware he said that's why they say get a dog. yeah. by the way,

they're right. i mean, he was hurting the party. they didn't want to have him on and they've done everything possible to remove him and i guess it's within their right to do so. it just seems like it's a little cool. and once again, the point that i always make on the show is just be transparent about it and just say it's yes, we asked him to step down because he was essentially brawling it for the party. and we had to do it and her, but we did it instead. it's like all this double talk about, well we didn't really want him to go away. we just wanted his campaign to go away. well, here's one more. one more thing, manella. did you, did you watch? did you watch last night? were you watching last night? i the as much as i could. i the but i got to tell you. stevie wonder stevie wonder what i watched for i'm a political guy. so i watch your bill clinton, he's my stevie wonder and, and just watch bill. this bill clinton go you think they're kidding. but i know all these folks,

most of them are really good people. but some of them think that they are bound to dominate america politically, economically and socially. and they have to use politics to do it. and i should read this 1st. i don't believe in. that's something he looked feeble. his hands, you know we're, we're, we're, we're shaking his voice was cracking. he was raspy. just it was fast. for me you're, this is human drama. we're talking about here. it was fascinating to see a guy who i personally think is one of the greatest presidential communicators who's ever lived. i don't care what they say about reagan, an obama. i know there's people who are going to put, you know, put their votes in for them. um, to suddenly see him in that light. i it kind of shocked me. i didn't expect it. but

you know, it is what it is and father time is coming knocking. well rick, we got a point out. he is 78 years old. he's just slightly younger than donald trump and several years younger than president biden is right now. but i think when we as spectators, forgetting journalists, we as world spectators, when we think of bill clinton, we think of him in his glory days when he was in the oval office. i mean, at the time there, when he was an a 1st and doctor rated, he was 46 years old. i mean, he was the, the 3rd youngest president ever inaugurated. and to this day, right. so i think we all think of him in that prime in that hey yeah, but, but it was but then, but it has been felt with health problems. right. but it's more than that. i mean, george bush was young too, and he sounded like an idiot every time he talked, there was something back. there was something about, there was something about bill clinton. victory made him one of the one of the it factor more than obama, more than just about everybody else. he,

he had that they are back then and to see and have said, yeah, he was a great or reader. and as time has caught up, rick, he's 78 years old. he's got the case of the handshakes. we're usually part and parcel of parkinson's disease. yeah. i didn't want to say that we were getting more . yeah. yeah, no, yeah, it looks like nation advice, you know, or are politicians or the cost or i guess all you gotta do is do it on the tv or watch any political show. and you see these guys like the great senator from the state of kentucky who every once in a while just seems to go into some cerebral sit around the whole different hard to watch, hard to watch. all right, so it's that, it's that, thank you, kiddo, we'll talk to you again very soon. i and when we come back, china, china, we discuss a big story that has gotten little to no attention this week by the main stream media about the united states, altering it to nuclear strategy to focus on china and k j no is a journalist,

he's an author, he's a political analyst and the perfect person to discuss the story with cuz he might know a little bit about it. so stay right there. we're going to come right back china and looks the beautiful sun soaked vineyards and nestled among some rest, taking rolling hills as a gentle breeze comes off of the surrounding sea comic imagery of french one country. but this is not france. we are in a coupon at russia on the black sea where recently they've got a serious about making some world class one the. hey, welcome back. i'm rick sanchez. let's continue this. you know, well, most people aren't thinking as middle and i were just talking about a little while ago. the jo biden's presidency is finished somewhere in like palm

beach, california on a beach right now literally were told there's a report of a new york times that seems to be suggesting not so fast. and what is a huge story that is being generally ignored by the u. s. media? because who cares about the possibility of nuclear war? right? administration is revising it's nuclear strategy with an emphasis on china. where'd this come from? why? because according to the nuclear employment guidance, that's what they're calling it. it sounds like a jobs program. and when you think of it, it probably kind of is. the pentagon is concerned, the china is nuclear stockpiles will rival the quote size and the diversity of the united states and rushes over the next decade. so that's why they're doing all of this. wow, talk about out of left field. joining us now to talk about this is a k j. now, k j is an author, he's a journalist, is a teacher is a job, a geopolitical analyst, and he's also the host of the china report on the breakthrough news.

congratulations on that k j, and thanks so much for joining us. thank you, rick. pleasure to meet with you. so what do i mean? uh, what is it that the united states is saying they have just found out about china? that is so important. what's your take? well, i think we have to take all of these things with both a grain of salt and also do some deep analysis around them. if you remember in the early 2, thousands there was this thing called the to low panic. i don't know if you know have you ever seen the film moorland that marshall of course and do you remember those big circular houses? yeah. ok. well, the us in the early 2, thousands, they came up with this report saying that china had created scores of new new, clear silos. and this was a dead leaf thread to the united states. it turned out on closer examination. these were these 500 year old chinese circular houses where, you know,

clans live inside them, they're made out of money. they're 500 years old. and the us was saying that these when you new, clear silos. so there's a little, there's a little bit of a history of threat inflation. and if i may go so far as to give you the actual statistics. in 1984, the d i a, the pentagon estimated the china had 200 a little under 200 nuclear weapons. mm hm. moorhead but they estimate that they would be $800.00 in a decade. then they would, none of those projections came true. so in 1999 they said, well they still have 200, but within 20 years they'll have 500. that didn't come true. and then in 2019 they said, well, they still have around 200, but we estimate in 15 years they'll have 1500. so this is almost an history of threat inflation, which is not up held by the fact that the facts are didn't you find that as of very,

very minimal nuclear deterrent. it's the absolute minimum that they believe is necessary kind of almost as symbolic the terror. mm. they have no launch onboarding . their warheads are detached from the vehicles and they have no 1st strike policy . well, yeah, yeah. so if i was just going to add to that, i would just checking on it rush. i has the most nuclear warheads they have a 5500 and according to a i overview the united states. as $5044.00, they have 90 percent of the world nuclear weapons. according to these reports, china is not, not anywhere near any of that. so i would imagine some people are we saying, well, what's up and what our, the chinese, reacting to this a will the chinese are not happy about this, a tall. uh, they say that this is a, the us is attempt to, uh, uh, to uh,

to create an escalation dominance to create a pretext for escalation dominance. essentially they sent us is using this to shark, its responsibilities to uh, meaningfully negotiate, uh, you know, new, clear reductions. and instead to use this as a pretext for new, clear escalation and nuclear domino's, i think personally, it's a little bit more ominous than that. i think what this is trying to do, and remember this is from the new york times, right. this is the white house correspondent working at the new york times. i think that what they're trying to do, and this is clearly a leak that was fed to him, is they're trying to normalize the idea of nuclear war with try to it's their fault, therefore, you know, think about it. we're going to go to what we don't want to, but you know, looks like we're going to have to have nuclear war with china and we see this right now inquiry. they're rehearsing nuclear work on the korean peninsula. the deputy

national security advisor has threatened to new china and new north korea, which essentially the same thing is waging war with china. and the deputy doesn't have the authority to say any of those things unless you was authorized. well, it always seems to come back these conversations, doesn't it? to the fact that having an escalation is fruitful and profitable for certain people in the military, industrial complex fear. how much of that do you think is involved in this a oh and certainly, i mean the industry is very, very much a part of it, right? it's, it's like shoot part of the military industrial complex. and also remember as the economic system starts to scale. traditionally, what is being done, the reboot is war. so this is the thinking about using war to reboot the economy.

so that's definitely very much part of it. but i think that what we really have to watch out for is nuclear war is not something you trifle trifle with car new us war doctrine is new, clear. first stripe. it's what they call a nuts nuclear july section targets selection, which is a counter force doctrine, where you simply preemptively strike your enemy 1st. in other words, the us doctrine of war against china and other countries is the new, clear sucker punch. why would anybody in our government go along with something like that? what, what, what i can understand the profit motive behind this. but you know, some bureaucrat, i guess i don't know the kind of gone the state department, wherever it is, the people who are involved in these decisions all the way up to the white house. why would they do something where, what's the motivation there? k j i think it's decades and decades of accrued institutional

stupidity. it didn't happen overnight. this has been building up for a while. presidential directive of $59.00, which authorized counter force strikes for his drives was done in 1980 we're talking about decades. that was jimmy carter, and so this is decades of a crude ideological stupidity not. i know, institute not institutional wisdom, institutional stupidity that has led to these kind of ideological blind is that they believed that either they exhort dominance or they threatened to end the world . they would rather see the end of the plan at the end of their power and privilege . i think that's what it boils down to. it's a little bit like asking why does the schools you don't want to take out the entire school? and there's a mental illness there, but for these people, the ruling neil con elite class for them the entire world is the school. wow.

um, let me ask you about china. are they escalating their new we're proliferation and if not, will this make them more apt to do so? you fear, you know, i think that's the $64000.00 question. nobody has a good answer to that right now. i'm sure they're thinking about really hard because essentially what the us has done in the speculation is declared a nuclear pivot in 2011, a declared pivot to asia. that is, we're containing china, we're escalating to war with china. mm hm. and then recently they've declared the nuclear pivot to china. this is what this is. even though china is known, arsenal is only one fraction with that it's, it's 120th of what the us has. nothing is actually assembled for war. it's the i said the war has a separate from delivery vehicle. so one of the chinese thinking we can look back to history, what they did in the past. once again, in the 19161961, there was

a presidential director. essentially, the plug was to new china just for the hell of it. if we go to war with the. so the soviet union will also new all of china cities. and we expect anywhere from 60 to 90 percent destruction of all of china's cities. that was the plan in the 19 sixty's. now, how did the chinese response, did they go on a rampage and do a kind of nuclear arms race like the soviet union? no, they didn't tell you what they did and it's something which will a small issue during that period. the chinese were very aware that the us would upload little, right all the cities along the coastline where which, which was the industrial court. and so what the chinese did secretly and they kept the secret for decades, was that they rebuilt the entire infrastructure inside the interior of the country, along hidden mountains. when nobody knew this was happening,

it's almost as if you can imagine the united states decided to rebuild chicago, pittsburgh, new york, l. a san jose, inside the what, the mountains of the rockies in wyoming. and nobody knew about it. no, if you go the, if you go to chunk chain, you'll see there's a manhattan that, yes sprout in the mountains. but the chinese approach is to, is to build not ball. so i think they'll try and de escalate this and they'll try and look for some kind of constructive way to talk the united states down from this nuclear magnet spell itself. so let's hope so. let's hope they have a moment of de escalation by having more dialogues, something that's missing across the board right now. and once again, you and i are having a discussion about a story that you probably will not even hear if you happen to live in the united states and watch cable news or read any of the major, big city newspapers. and that ain't right. but uh, thanks k j for sharing your insight on this. appreciate it. thank you,

rick. that's our show number. always be looking outside your own box to stay. don't live in boxes. it just be like to say alexandria and we'll be looking for you next time. the move, what else? they just don't have to shape house after and engagement equals the trail. when so many find themselves world support. we choose to look for common ground, the of

the breaking news and disturbing images on the southern russia. but as of both the sciences, neutralize full inmates who engaged in the revolt and how 6 to the incident as a correctional facility and the who, i'd be more than $5000.00, you could in terms of killed in the failed incursion into rush of policy. that is one of the areas where can you also found themselves in the process the ukrainians. they have been using google that fire power to hips a strictly civilian area. this is a one of the cost of munitions that did not explode. tv 3 data in the us. willingness to contribute in all possible ways to facilitate.