of the of wanted to come here since i was 12, when my grandfather told me that his mom came from russia that we were, i was part russian. i didn't plan on staying this long. i was gonna look around. i was gonna see if it was for me, but then i came and then i was like, i remember when i go home, i've never been happier in life than i am here. so i've only lived here a few months, but i wanted to tell you what fascinates me about russia and share the stories of other foreigners who lived here like jay who worked as a chef and now raises godes and makes cheese in the countryside series. like chad who has been granted political asylum because he's being persecuted by the f. b. i . us, embassies. and for countries that come after me it's, it's wild like an american family that recently moved to russia with 6 children. i've never felt safer at my entire life. than living here, the

hey rick sanchez here. this is direct impact and this is what we're going to be talking about. they have unfortunately turned us into us boiler and, and we don't want to be as boiler, we want it to and we wanted a fair shot. our k juniors running made explains how the democrats pushed him away . and apparently into mister trump's loving arms, you're going to hear it for yourself. we're gonna let you see that i'm rick sanchez . let's do this. the right r f. k junior. obviously, his uncle was the president, his father would have been president, had not been shot as a prominent member of one of the most famous democratic families in us history.

he's going to quit the race and possibly endorse donald trump and be here. he's running may tell if it's happening because he's been treated so poorly. she says by the democratic party, this gmc aligned pack that was created specifically to take us out has spent millions of dollars to take us out. they have unfortunately turned us into a spoiler. and, and we don't want to be as boiler we wanted to when we wanted a fair shot at the dnc, made that impossible for us. they have this band shadow band as kept us up stages. manipulated pools use law fair against us, sued us in every possible state. we've even planted insiders into our campaign to disrupt and to create actual legal issues for us. so let's talk about this

obvious question. will he actually endorse trump? and what's he going to get for doing? so these things always have a price, right? there is talk of a cabinet position, but it's not firmed up yet. why is the out? why is the money time and a dropping poll numbers, possibly. who's? who's you're going to really help in this? right? the obvious answer would seem to be donald trump, because he's going to endorse donald trump. but it ain't automatic. you know what i mean? it depends on how he sells it, and how mr. trump sells that maybe perhaps during their announcement, remember, his followers tend to dislike both parties. all right, so convincing them to make that job is going to be kind of hard. and it may even help harris, because aligning with trump could anger some of his followers who don't want to go along with anybody. this is, this is a, this is quite a pickle here. you know, manila, this whole thing is probably going to work itself out. it's,

it's going to be fun to watch it. now. what are your thoughts? oh, absolutely. it's going to be fun to watch. but to nicole shanahan's point, she's absolutely right. the, the democratic side of this, you know, political show that we have here in the united states has been proven over. and over that while that particular party stands, they say for pro choice, when it comes to women's rights, they're not so pro choice when it comes to the ballot box. and we've seen how they've treated our f k junior, which is why he jumped ship. they were not going to allow that, that we, if we can call it that of the democrats to actually be successful or have a real chance at being on the the dump the dnc ticket in the primaries because we didn't even see a primary for the democrats so to her point, she's absolutely right. she's pulling the veil back on how it's actually done,

but it was that he has gone independent. the numbers have gone down rick steadily and decline since he left the party. but a lot of the polls do show that if people were, were poached, we'll call it that because i don't believe people are, you know, um they should or have to vote one party or the other. but if they are radically, if he were poaching from anybody, he'd be mostly poaching from trump voters because the people that are on the democratic side have already drank the kool aid and they are going to vote blue no matter who. so the p, the party, he would have been hurting, would have been the republicans in this case. it's donald trump. so for him to go and potentially, we don't know, potentially, you know, square of a deal behind closed doors somewhere. then, you know, that's kudos to him and that's, that's great for, for kennedy and the mission that he has and whatever that is. and so i think if he backs trump, i think it will actually help trump because it will bring the people back to the

republican party. we disagree. i think he's going to end up having absolutely no effect a minimal effect or maybe even going the other way and helping harris because so many of those people are going to look at it as i don't, i didn't, i, the reason i was going to vote for you is because i didn't want to be yeah. so don't tell me what to do kind of thing, but what, what will say they will say, hey, they hate harris more than they hate trump? i think those those particular motors. okay. very starting to be some real bickering in the democratic party about how president joe biden was treated on the 1st night of the election. this is new. the president was supposed to give his final ba bye in prime time, around 8 or 9 o'clock. the guy is it's, it's really getting late now. so let's wrap up the other speakers and bring out joe . please welcome, congressman jim tribe or raphael warner. kathy hoko alexandria of gus. you'll see me jasmine crockett, chris and i want to talk with you for just

a few minutes. the ceiling going on? no disrespect to chris coons, but chris, boone's midnight mom has got to get to bed and you know who else has to get to bed for the love of god. let's hear from biden. please welcome ashley bye. it's good. you know, everybody's talking about it since it happened. he didn't even get on stage until like the prime time audience was gone and they had all gone to bed. so most americans didn't even get to see the brother united states. what is you know, farewell speech? well, what was it done on purpose? democratic convention, official say it happened because it was just too many long ovations and the night went long. funny how that didn't happen when mister obama store from when mister

clinton spoke afterwards, vag to the matter of the democrat, the party seems to be done with mister button. and while it may make sense from a political standpoint to try and win the election to do so, you know, to do it that way. just seems a little harsh, you know, just a little harsh. and here's nancy pelosi, by the way. she finally got nailed down on this thing. couple of dick tapper and what's her name over and cnn sat her down during the convention and asked her, did she push binding out of the rich? it does seem like there's some residual bad blood or resentment and i'm wondering if you've spoken to him and, and, and what your responses to that. sometimes you just have to take a pods for the pills and he made the decisions for the country. my concern was not about the president was about his campaign. as you, as he has seen, the exuberance, the excitement that has come forth in the country. i just did

a event for one of our members and illinois. eric johnson today. immediately he got 1100 volunteers into his campaign. as soon as that announcement, nobody is questioning the fact that that the democratic party seems much better positioned right now than it did. 4 weeks and 2 days ago. there's no question about that. a former speaker, polosa you why we've been talking about it. yeah. why we've been talking about this thing. you know, it's interesting is that she didn't go after by me. she went after his campaign, isn't that the same thing? i'm just curious, but why god, rick, it's it, gosh, it's, i mean, again, it just shows you that the, the d n c machine just choose you up and spits you out when you are no longer useful to it. in this case, biden was the poor spat out full that they use for a couple of years to achieve their means was to get, you know, donald trump, out of office. that was the end goal. and he was the means. and i guess, you know,

poor old joe and, and whatever 40 your friendship he thought he had with nancy pelosi that. yeah. door. yeah. as well. i like to there's no such thing as loyalty. well m vitaware, he said that's why they say get a dog. yeah. by the way, they're right. i mean, he was hurting the party. they didn't want to have him on and they've done everything possible to remove him and i guess it's within their right to do so. it just seems like it's a little cruel. and once again, the point that i always make on the show is just be transparent about it. and to say it's yes, we asked them to step down because he was essentially brawling it for the party. and we had to do it and it her, but we did it instead. it's like all this double talk about, well we didn't really want him to go away. we just wanted his campaign to go away. well, here's one more. one more thing, manella did. you did you watch? did you watch last night? were you watching last night? i did as much as i could. i the but i got to tell you. stevie wonder stevie wonder

what i watched for i'm a political guy, so i watch your booklet and he's my stevie wonder and, and just watch bill. this bill clinton go you think they're kidding. but i know all these folks, most of them are really good people. but some of them think that they are bound to dominate america politically, economically and socially. and they have to use politics to do it. and they said regular service, i don't believe in. that's something he looked feeble. his hands, you know we're, we're, we're shaking his voice was cracking. he was raspy. just it was fast for me. yeah, this is human drama. we're talking about here. it was fascinating to see a guy who i personally think is one of the greatest presidential communicators

who's ever lived. i don't care what they say about reagan and obama. i know there's people who are going to put, you know, put their votes in for them. um, to suddenly see him in that light. i it kind of shocked me. i didn't expect it. but you know, it is what it is and father time is coming knocking. well rick, we got a point out. he is 78 years old. he's just slightly younger than donald trump and several years younger than president biden is right now. but i think when we as spectators, forgetting journalists, we as world spectators, when we think of bill clinton, we think of him in his glory days when he was in the oval office. i mean, at the time there, when he was an a 1st and doctor rated, he was 46 years old. i mean, he was the, the 3rd youngest president ever inaugurated. and to this day, right. so i think we all think of him in that prime in that hey yeah, but, but it was but then, but it has been felt with health problems. right. but it's more than that. i mean,

george bush was young too, and he started like an idiot. every time he talked, there was something back. there was something about, there was something about bill clinton. victory made him one of the, one of the hit factor more than obama, more than just about everybody else. he, he had at fair and back then. and to see and have said, yeah, he was a great our reader. and as time has caught up rick, he's 78 years old. he's got the case of the handshakes. we're usually part and parcel of parkinson's disease. yeah, i didn't want to say that we were getting more. yeah. yeah, no, yeah, it was a nation revise. you know, or are politicians are close there? i guess all you gotta do is do it on the tv. you watch any political show and you see these guys like the great senator from the state of kentucky who every once in a while just seems to go into some cerebral sit around the whole different hard to watch, hard to watch. all right, so it's that, it's that, thank you, kiddo, we'll talk to you again very soon. i, when we come back, china, china, we discuss

a big story that has gotten little to no attention this week by the main stream media about the united states, altering its nuclear strategy to focus on china. and k, j. now is a journalist, he's an author, he's a political analyst, and the perfect person to discuss the story with cuz he might know a little bit about it. so stay right there. we're going to come right back china and looks the release of come to the russian states. never as one of the most sense community best ingles, all sense and up the in the 65 with the keys, 195 must be the one else. paul's question about this, even though we will then in the european union,

the kremlin machine states on the russians cruising and split the r t supposed neg, keeping our video agency roughly all the band on youtube, the fitness center for the question, did you say stephen twist which is the beautiful sun soaked, the vineyards nestled among some rest, taking the rolling hills as a gentle breeze comes off of the surrounding sea comic the imagery of french one country. but this has not france. we are in a coupon at russia on the black sea where recently they've got a serious about making some world class one the. hey, welcome back. i'm rick sanchez. let's continue this. you know,

well, most people aren't thinking as my little and i were just talking about a little while ago. the jo biden's presidency is finished somewhere in like palm beach, california on a beach right now literally were told there's a report of the new york times that seems to be suggesting not so fast in what is a huge story that is being generally ignored by the u. s. media because who cares about the possibility of nuclear war? right? the ministration is revising its nuclear strategy with an emphasis on china. where'd this come from? why? because according to the nuclear employment guidance, that's what they're calling it. it sounds like a jobs program, and when you think of it, it probably kind of is dependent on is concerned, the china is nuclear stockpiles will rival the quote size and the diversity of the united states and rushes over the next decade. so that's why they're doing all of this. wow, talk about out of left field. joining us now to talk about this is that k j now,

k j is an author, he's a journalist as a teacher is a job. do you have political analysts? and he's also the host of the china report on the breakthrough news. congratulations on that k j, and thanks so much for joining us. thank you, rick. pleasure to meet with you. so what do i mean? uh, what is it that the united states is saying they have just found out about china that is so important. what's your take? well, i think we have to take all of these things with both a grain of salt and also do some deep analysis around them. if you remember in the early 2, thousands there was this thing called the to low panic. i don't know if you know, have you ever seen the film moorland that marshall of course. and do you remember those big circular houses? yeah. ok. well, the us in the early 2, thousands, they came up with this report saying that china had created scores of new new, clear silos. and this was a dead leaf thread to the united states. it turned out on closer examination. these

were these 500 year old chinese circular houses where you know, clans live inside them the made out of much their 500 years old in the us was saying that these when you new, clear silos. so there's a little, there's a little bit of a history of threat inflation. and if i may go so far as to give you the actual statistics. in 1984, the d i a, the pentagon estimated the china had 200 a little under 200 nuclear weapons. mm hm. moorhead but they estimate that they would be $800.00 in a decade. then they would not have those projections came true. so in 1999 they said, well they still have 200, but within 20 years they'll have 500. that didn't come true. and then in 2019 they said, well, they still have around 200, but we estimate in 15 years they'll have 1500. so this is almost an history of

threat inflation, which is not up held by the fact that the facts are didn't you find that as of very, very minimal nuclear deterrent. it's the absolute minimum that they believe is necessary kind of almost a symbolic deterrent. they have no launch onboarding. their warheads are detached from the vehicles and they have no further stripe policy. well yeah, yeah. is it, in fact i was just gonna add to that. i would just checking on it rush. i has the most, uh, nuclear warheads they have uh, 5500 and according to a i overview the united states. as $5044.00, they have 90 percent of the world's nuclear weapons. according to these reports, china is not, not anywhere near any of that. so i would imagine some people are we saying, well, what's up and what our, the chinese reacting to this a will the chinese are not happy about this, a tall. uh, they say that this is a,

the us is attempt to, uh, the, uh, to uh, to create an escalation dominance to create a pretext for escalation dominance. essentially they sent us is using this to shark, its responsibilities to uh, meaningfully negotiate, uh, you know, new, clear reductions. and instead to use this as a pretext for new, clear escalation and nuclear domino's, i think personally, it's a little bit more ominous than that. i think what this is trying to do, and remember this is from the new york times, right. this is the white house correspondent working at the new york times. i think that what they're trying to do, and this is clearly a leak that was fed to him, is they're trying to normalize the idea of nuclear war with china. it's their fault, therefore, you know, think about it. we're going to go to what we don't want to,

but you know, looks like we're going to have to have nuclear war with china and we see this right now inquiry. they're rehearsing nuclear work on the korean peninsula. the deputy national security advisor has threatened to new china and new north korea, which essentially is the same thing as waging war with china. and the deputy doesn't have the authority to say any of those things unless you was authorized. well, it always seems to come back these conversations, doesn't it? to the fact that having an escalation is fruitful and profitable for certain people in the military, industrial complex fear. how much of that do you think is involved in this a oh and certainly, i mean the industry is very, very much a part of it, right? it's, it's such a huge part of the military industrial complex. and also remember as the economic

system starts to scale, traditionally, what is being done? the reboot is war. so this is the thinking about using war to reboot the economy. so that's definitely very much part of it. but i think that what we really have to watch out for is nuclear war is not something you trifle trifle with cart. the us war doctrine is new, clear, 1st stripe. it's what they call a knots nuclear july station targets selection, which is a counter force doctrine where you simply preemptively strike your enemy 1st. in other words, the us doctrine of war against china and other countries is the nuclear sucker punch. why would anybody in our government go along with something like that? what, what, what, i can understand the profit motive behind this, but you know, some very crap, i guess i don't know the kind of gone the state department,

wherever it is, the people who are involved in these decisions all the way up to the white house. why would they do something? right? what's the motivation there? k j? i think it's decades and decades of the crude institutional stupidity. it didn't happen overnight. this has been building up for a while. presidential directive of $59.00, which authorized counter force strikes for his tribes, was done in 1980. we're talking about decades that was jimmy carter. and so this is decades of a crude ideological stupidity. not i una institute, not institutional wisdom, institutional stupidity that has led to these kind of ideological blind is that they believe that either they exhort dominance or they threaten to end the world. they would rather see the end of the plan at the end of their power and privilege. i think that's what it boils now. it's a little bit like asking why does the schools you don't want to take up the entire school? and there's a mental illness there, but for these people,

the ruling neil con elite class for them the entire world is the school. wow. um, let me ask you about china. are they escalating their new, clear proliferation? and if not, will this make them more apt to do? so? you fear, you know, i think that's the $64000.00 question. nobody has a good answer to that right now. i'm sure they're thinking about really hard because essentially what the us is done in this declaration is declared a nuclear pivot in 2011, they declared pivot to asia. that is, we're containing china. we're escalating to war with china. mm hm. and then recently they've declared the new, clear pivots attorney. this is what this is. even though china is known, arsenal is only one fraction with that it's, it's 120th of what the us has been. nothing is actually assembled for war. it's the

i said the war has a separate from delivery vehicle. so one of the chinese thinking we can look back to history, what they did in the past. once again, in the 19161961, there was a presidential directive. essentially, the plug was to new china just for the hell of it. if we go to war with the. so the soviet union will also new all of trying to cities and we expect anywhere from 60 to 90 percent destruction of all of china's cities. that was the plan in the 19 sixty's. now, how did the chinese response, did they go on a rampage and do a kind of nuclear arms race like the soviet union? no, they didn't tell you what they and it's something which will a small issue during that period. the chinese were very aware that the us would upload literal, right? all the cities along the coastline where which, which was the industrial court. and so what the chinese did secretly and they kept the secret for decades, was that they rebuilt the entire infrastructure inside the interior of the country,

along hidden mountains where nobody knew this was happened. it's almost as if you can imagine, the united states decided to rebuild the chicago, pittsburgh new york, l. a san jose, inside the, what, the mountains of the rockies in wyoming. and nobody knew about it. no, if you go there, if you go to the junction, you'll see there's a manhattan that, yes sprout in the mountains. but the chinese approach is to, is to build not ball. so i think they'll try and de escalate this and they'll try and look for some kind of constructive way to talk the united states down from this nuclear magnet spell itself. so let's hope so. let's hope they have a moment of de escalation by having more dialogues, something that's missing across the board right now. and once again, you and i are having a discussion about a story that you probably will not even hear if you happen to live in the united

states and watch cable news or read any of the major, big city newspapers. and that ain't right. but uh, thanks k j for sharing your insight on this. appreciate it. thank you, rick. that's our show number. always be looking outside your own box to stay, don't live in boxes and just be like to say, alright sandra, and we'll be looking for you next time. the it's, it's almost like almost a cliche in the west. but this whole idea of, with my, to the last refrain in some truth behind it. i mean, think about it for the american $60000000000.00 for the reason. a package, small, a lot of money. a lot of money stays within the united states in terms of the

defense contract, as in the light and pulled on money that, you know, they buy time, they prolong the war to keep russia busy. you know, this is the, ultimately, this is what the west is doing is on a file you know, trying to preserve west to take him and the, by the early 1950. can you became one of the centers of resistance to colonialism if half of the british invaders infringed on the most basic rights of the local population? great britain pursued the policy of squeezing out the local population from their indigenous lands. the best airable areas were given to white farmers, dooming canyon step poverty and hunger. this caused the sharp protest of the

peasants and led to the emerging of the mile mile movement, which started the fight against the invaders. the rebels felt themselves kenya, land, and freedom army. the spiritual leader of the movement would be anti colonial, active as jo, mo, kenyata, the freedom fighters used guerrilla tactics and attacked individual units of the british troops. the latter responded with massive air rays and artillery effects. when suppressing the uprise of london relied on maximum cruelty over $50000.00 canyons were killed. about 300000 people were thrown into prisons and concentration camps where tortures in no way very or in girls. the to the nazis was widely practiced. the veracity of the colonial list only led to temporary success. in 1963, the british empire had to recognize the independence of gain. yeah. however, the colonial regime left behind a trail of blood and boons at the canyon nation has not recovered from on sale. now,

[000:00:00;00] the disturbing images from southern russia and uprising of the jill in the global grad region is suppressed by special forces of the 4 in need. space to revolt, ad to cost to moscow says kia has lost more than $5000.00. and so just it's ongoing incarcerated into russia are the visits one area and we became the bottle ground the ukrainians. they have been using little that 5 power to hips a strictly civilian area. this is one of the cluster, munitions that did not explode is to have the we and not wrong that there is russia