because no choice but to move forward and full of shit the the hey rick sanchez here. this is direct impact. and this is what we're going to be talking about. they have unfortunately turned us into a spoiler and, and we don't want to be as boiler, we want it when we wanted a fair shot. our k juniors running made explains how the democrats pushed him away . and apparently into mister trump's loving arms, you're gonna hear it for yourself. we're gonna let you see that i'm rick sanchez. let's do this. the right r f. k junior. obviously his uncle was the president, his father would have been president, had not been shot. a prominent member,

or one of the most famous democratic families in us history, he's gonna quit the race and possibly endorse donald trump and be here is running, may tell if it's happening because he's been treated so poorly. she says by the democratic party, this dmc aligned pack that was created specifically to take us out has spent millions of dollars to take us out. they have unfortunately turned us into us boiler and, and we don't want to be as boiler we wanted to when we wanted a fair shot at the dnc, made that impossible for us. they have this band shadow band as kept us off stages. manipulated polls use lothair against us, sued us in every possible state. we've even planted insiders into our campaign to disrupt it and to create actual legal issues for us. so let's talk about this

obvious question. will he actually endorse trump? and what's he going to get for doing? so these things always have a price, right? there is talk of a cabinet position, but it's not firmed up yet. why is the out? why is the money time and a dropping poll numbers, possibly. who's? who's you're going to really help in this? right? the obvious answer would seem to be donald trump, because he's going to endorse donald trump. but it ain't automatic. you know what i mean? it depends on how he sells it and how mr. trump sells. it may be perhaps during their announcement, remember, his followers tend to dislike both parties. right? so convincing them to make that job is going to be kind of hard. and it may even help harris because aligning with trump could and are some of his followers who don't want to go along with anybody. this is, this is a, this is quite a pickle here. you know, manila,

this whole thing is probably going to work itself out. it's, it's going to be fun to watch it. now, what are your thoughts? oh, absolutely. it's going to be fun to watch. but to nicole shanahan's point, she's absolutely right. the, the democratic side of this, you know, political show that we have here in the united states has been proven over. and over that while that particular party stands, they say for pro choice, when it comes to women's rights, they're not so pro choice when it comes to the ballot box. and we've seen how they've treated our f k junior, which is why he jumped ship. they were not going to allow that, that we, if we can call it that of the democrats to actually be successful or have a real chance at being on the, the, the dump the dnc ticket in the primaries because we didn't even see a primary for the democrats, so to her point,

she's absolutely right. she's pulling the veil back on how it's actually done, but it was that he has gone independent. the numbers have gone down rick steadily and decline since he left the party. but a lot of the polls do show that if people were, were poached, we'll call it that because i don't believe people are, you know, um should or have to vote one party or the other. but if they are radically, if he were poaching from anybody, he'd be mostly poaching from trump voters because the people that are on the democratic side have already drank the kool aid and they are going to vote blue no matter who. so the p, the party, he would have been hurting, would have been the republicans in this case. it's donald trump. so for him to go and potentially, we don't know, potentially, you know, square of a deal behind closed doors somewhere. then, you know, that's kudos to him and that's, that's great for, for kennedy and the mission that he has and whatever that is. and so i think it

feedbacks trump, i think it will actually help trump the, it'll bring the people back to the republican party. we disagree, i think he's going to end up having absolutely no effect a minimal effect, or maybe even going the other way and helping harris because so many of those people are going to look at it as i don't, i didn't, i, the reason i was going to vote for you is because i didn't want to pull that up. so don't tell me what to do kind of thing. but what, what will say single say, hey, they hate harris more than they hate trump? i think those, those particular motors. okay. very starting to be some real bickering in the democratic party about how president joe biden was treated on the 1st night of the election. this is new. the president was supposed to give his final good bye in prime time, around 8 or 9 o'clock. the guy is it's, it's really getting late now. so let's wrap up the other speakers and bring out joe . please welcome, congressmen jim driver, raphael warner, kathy hoko, alexandria of gus. you see me, jasmine crockett,

chris and i want to talk with you for just a few minutes. the still going on? no disrespect to chris coons, but chris boons. midnight mom has got to get to bed and you know who else has to get to bed? for the love of god, let's hear from by then please welcome ashley bye. it's good. you know, everybody's talking about it since it happened. he didn't even get on stage until like the prime time audience was gone and they had all gone to bed. so most americans didn't even get to see the prison united states. what is you know, farewell speech? what was it done on purpose? democratic convention, official say it happened because it was just too many long ovations and the night

went long. funny how that didn't happen when mister obama store from when mister clinton spoke afterwards, vag doesn't matter, is the democrat, the party seems to be done with mister button. and while it may make sense from a political standpoint to try and win the election to do so, you know, to do it that way. it just seems a little harsh, you know, just a little harsh. and here's nancy pelosi, by the way. she finally got nailed down on this thing, couple of the desktop or, and what's her name over and cnn sat her down during the convention and asked her, did she push bite and out of the rich? and it does seem like there's some residual bad blood or resentment. and i'm wondering if you've spoken to him and, and, and what your responses to that. sometimes you just have to take a punch for the pills. he made the decisions for the country. my concern was not about the president was about his campaign. as you, as he has seen, the exuberance, the excitement that has come forth in the country. i just did

a event for one of our members in illinois. eric johnson today, immediately 1100 volunteers into his campaign. as soon as that announcement, nobody is questioning the fact that the democratic party seems much better position right now than it did for weeks and 2 days ago. there's no question about that. a former speaker, polosa you why we've been talking about it. yeah. why we've been talking about this thing. you know, what's interesting is that she didn't go after by me. she went after his campaign, isn't that the same thing? it's just, i'm just curious. but why god, rick, it's it, gosh, it's, i mean, again, it just shows you that the, the d, n c machine just choose you up and spits you out when you are no longer useful to it. in this case, biden was the poor spat out full that they use for a couple of years to achieve their means was to get, you know, donald trump, out of office. that was the end goal. and he was the means. and i guess, you know,

poor old joe and, and whatever 40 year friendship he thought he had with nancy pelosi that yeah. door . yeah. as well. i like to there's no such thing as loyalty. well m vitaware, he said that's why they say get a dog. yeah. by the way, they're right. i mean, he was hurting the party. they didn't want to have him on and they've done everything possible to remove him and i guess it's within their right to do so. it just seems like it's a little cruel. and once again, the point that i always make on the show is just be transparent about it and just say it's yes we ask them to step down because he was essentially brawling it for the party. and we had to do it and it her, but we did it instead. it's like all this double talk about, well we didn't really want him to go away. we just wanted his campaign to go away. well, here's one more. one more thing, manella did. you did you watch? did you watch last night? were you watching last night? i the as much as i could. i the but i got to tell you. stevie wonder stevie wonder

what i watched for i'm a political guy. so i watch your bill clinton. he's my stevie wonder and, and just watch bill. this bill clinton go you think they're kidding. but i know all these folks, most of them are really good people. but some of them think that they are bound to dominate america politically, economically and socially. and they have to use politics to do it. and i said, rick, the system i don't believe in. that's something he looked feeble. his hands, you know, we're, we're, we're, we're shaking his voice was cracking. he was raspy. just it was fast for me you this is human drama. we're talking about here. it was fascinating to see

a guy who i personally think is one of the greatest presidential communicators who's ever lived. i don't care what they say about reagan, an obama. i know there's people who are going to put, you know, put their votes in for them. um to suddenly see him in that light. it kind of shocked me. i didn't expect it. but you know, it is what it is, and father time is come on knocking. well, rick, we got a point out. he is 78 years old. he's just slightly younger than donald trump and several years younger. then president biden is right now. but i think when we, as spectators, forgetting journalists, we as world spectators, when we think of bill clinton, we think of him in his glory days when he was in the oval office. i mean, at the time there, when he was an, a 1st inaugurated he was 46 years old. i mean, he was the, the 3rd youngest president ever inaugurated. and to this day, right. so i think we all think of him in that prime in that hey yeah, but,

but it was but then, but it has been felt with health problems. right. but it's more than that. i mean, george bush was young too, and he sounded like an idiot every time he talked, there was something back. there was something about, there was something about bill clinton. victory made him one of the one of the it factor more than obama, more than just about everybody else. he, he had that as they are back then and to see and have the young. he was a great or raider and as time has caught up rick, he's 78 years old. he's got the case of the handshakes. we're usually part and parcel of parkinson's disease. yeah. i didn't want to say, boy, we're getting more. yeah, no, yeah, it was a nation advice, you know, or our politicians are close to. i guess all you gotta do is do it on the tv or watch any political show or do you see these guys like the great senator from the state of kentucky who every once in a while just seems to go into some cerebral sit around the whole different, hard to watch, hard to watch. all right, so it's fat. it's sad. thank you, kid. oh,

i will talk to you again very soon. i and when we come back to china, china, we discuss a big story that has gotten little to no attention this week. by the main stream, media about the united states, altering its nuclear strategy to focus on china and k j no is a journalist. he's an author, he's a political analyst, and the perfect person to discuss the story with because he might know a little bit about it. so stay right there. we're going to come right back. china looks the

hold on the hollywood local. now i was working on a dream list for dreams come true. we have approximately 10000000 people in california that are risk of becoming on house looks good man. pulls up something for working to 3 jobs and still not enough because the cost of leaving also has increased coal bags and then he'll buy chest last year long. the amount of of homeless rose by 12 percent in california.

the hey, welcome back. i'm rick sanchez. let's continue this, you know, well, most people aren't thinking as manila and i were just talking about a little while ago. the jo biden's presidency is finished somewhere in like palm beach, california on a beach right now literally were told there's a report of the new york times that seems to be suggesting not so fast. and what is a huge story that is being generally ignored by the us media? because who cares about the possibility of nuclear war? right? the ministration is revising it's nuclear strategy with an emphasis on china. where'd this come from? why? because according to the nuclear employment guidance, that's what they're calling it. it sounds like a jobs program. and when you think of it and probably kind of, it's dependent on is concerned. but china is nuclear stockpiles will rival the quote size and the diversity of the united states and rushes over the next decade.

so that's why they're doing all of this. wow, talk about on a left field. joining us now to talk about this is that k j now, k j is an author, is a journalist, is a teacher, is a job, a geopolitical analyst, and he's also the host of the china report on the breakthrough news. congratulations on that k j, and thanks so much for joining us. thank you, rick. pleasure to meet with you. so what do i mean? uh, what is it that the united states is saying they have just found out about china? that is so important. what's your take? well, i think we have to take all of these things with both a grain of salt and also do some deep analysis around them. if you remember in the early 2, thousands there was this thing called the 2 low panic. i don't know if you know, have you ever seen the film more line that much of course and do you remember those big circular houses? yeah. ok. well, the us in the early 2, thousands,

they came up with this report saying that china had created scores of new new, clear silos. and this was a dead leaf thread to the united states. it turned out on closer examination. these were these 500 year old chinese circular houses where, you know, clans live inside them, they're made out of money. they're 500 years old. and the us was saying, but these, when you new, clear silos. so there's a little, there's a little bit of a history of threat inflation. and if i may go so far as to give you the actual statistics. in 1984, the d i a, the pentagon estimated the china had 200 a little under 200 nuclear weapons. mm hm. more head. but they estimate that they would be $800.00 in a decade. then they would none of those projections came true. so in 1999 they said, well they still have 200, but within 20 years they'll have 500. that didn't come true. and then in 2019 they

said, well, they still have around 200, but we estimate in 15 years they'll have 1500. so this, this was the history of threat inflation, which is not up held by the fact that the facts or did you find that as of very, very minimal nuclear deterrent. it's the absolute minimum that they believe is necessary kind of almost as symbolic the terror. mm. they have no launch onboarding . their warheads are detached from the vehicles and they have no 1st strike policy . what? yeah, yeah. is it, in fact i was just gonna add to that. i would just checking on it rush. i has the most, uh, nuclear warheads they have uh, 5500 and according to a i overview the united states as 5000 uh, 44. they have 90 percent of the world's nuclear weapons. according to these reports, china is not, not anywhere near any of that. so i would imagine some people are we saying, well,

what's up and what, how are the chinese reacting to this a will the chinese are not happy about this, a tall? uh, they say that this is a, the us is attempt to, uh, uh, to uh, to create an escalation dominance to create a pretext for escalation dominance. essentially they sent us is using this to shark, its responsibilities to meaningfully negotiate, you know, new, clear reductions. and instead to use this as a pretext for nuclear escalation and nuclear domino's, i think personally, it's a little bit more ominous than that. i think what this is trying to do, and remember this is from the new york times, right? this is the white house correspondent working at the new york times. i think that what they're trying to do, and this is clearly a leak that was fed to him, is they're trying to normalize the idea of nuclear war with try to it's their fault,

therefore, you know, think about it. we're going to go to what we don't want to, but you know, looks like we're going to have to have nuclear war with china and we see this right now inquiry. they're rehearsing nuclear work on the korean peninsula. the deputy national security advisor has threatened to new china, but in new north korea, which essentially is the same thing as waging war with china. and the deputy doesn't have the authority to say any of those things unless you was authorized. well, it always seems to come back these conversations, doesn't it? to the fact that having an escalation is fruitful and profitable for certain people in the military industrial complex sphere. how much of that do you think is involved in this? oh, and certainly, i mean, the industry is very, very much a part of it,

right it's, it's such a huge part of the military industrial complex. and also remember as the economic system starts to scale a traditionally what is being done, the reboot is war. so this is the thinking about using war to reboot the economy. so that's definitely very much part of it. but i think that what we really have to watch out for is nuclear war is not something you trifle trifle with current view. us war doctrine is nuclear. first strike, it's what they call. busy the nuts nuclear, july's vision targets selection, which is a counter force doctrine, where you simply preemptively stripe your enemy 1st. in other words, the us doctrine of war against china and other countries is the new, clear sucker punch. why would anybody in our government go along with something like that?

what, what, what i can understand the profit motive behind this. but you know, some bureaucrat, i guess i don't know the kind of gone the state department, wherever it is, the people who are involved in these decisions all the way up to the white house. why would they do something where, what's the motivation that are k j? i think it's decades and decades of the crude institutional stupidity. it didn't happen overnight. this has been building up for a while. presidential directive of $59.00, which authorized counter for strikes for his drives was done in 1980. we're talking about decades that was jimmy carter. and so this is decades of a crude ideological stupidity, not i. the institute not institutional wisdom, institutional stupidity that has led to these kind of ideological blind is that they believe that either they exhort dominance or they threaten to end the world, they would rather see the end of the plan at the end of their power and privilege i think that's what it boils now,

but it's little bit like asking why does the school shoot a want to take out the entire school? there's a mental illness there, but for these people, the ruling neil con elite class for them the entire world is the school. wow. um, let me ask you about china. are they escalating their new, clear proliferation? and if not, will this make them more apt to do so? you fear, you know, i think that's the $64000.00 question. nobody has a good answer to that right now. i'm sure they're thinking about really hard because essentially what the us has done in this declaration is declared a nuclear pivot in 2011, they declared pivot to asia. that is, we're containing china. we're escalating to war with china. mm hm. and then recently they've declared the nuclear pivots attorney, this is what this is. even though china is known, arsenal is only one fraction. with that it's,

it's 120th of what the us has and nothing is actually assemble for war. it's the i said the war has a separate from delivery vehicle. so one of the chinese thinking we can look back to history, what they did in the past. once again, in the 19161961, there was a presidential directive. essentially, the plan was to new china, just for the hell of it. if we go to war with the. so the soviet union will also new all of china cities. and we expect anywhere from 60 to 90 percent destruction of all of china's cities. that was the plan in the 19 sixty's. now, how did the chinese response, did they go on a rampage and do a kind of nuclear arms race like the soviet union? no, they didn't tell you what they did, something which will astonish you. during that period, the chinese were very aware that the us would upload literal, right? all the cities along the coastline where which,

which was the industrial court. and so what the chinese did secretly and they kept the secret for decades, was that they rebuilt the entire infrastructure inside the interior of the country, along hidden mountains. when nobody knew this was happening, it's almost as if you can imagine, the united states decided to rebuild chicago, pittsburgh, new york at la, san jose, inside the what, the mountains of the rockies in wyoming. and nobody knew about it. no, if you go there, if you go to the junction, you'll see there's a manhattan desk sprout out of the mountains. but the chinese approach is to, is to build not ball. so i think they'll try and de escalate this and they'll try and look for some kind of constructive way to talk the united states down from this nuclear mat spell itself. so let's hope so. let's hope they have a moment of de escalation by having more dialogues, something that's missing across the board right now. and once again,

you and i are having a discussion about a story that you probably will not even hear if you happen to live in the united states and watch cable news or read any of the major, big city newspapers. and that ain't right. but uh, thanks k j for sharing your insight on this. appreciate it. i thank you rick. that's our show number. always be looking outside your own box to stay. don't live in boxes if you like to say alexandria and we'll be looking for you next time. the,

[000:00:00;00] the, in 1884, the german empire began its colonial invasion internet media. from the very start, burling encourage the white columnist to settle in south west africa and take away the best land from the local drive. the germans were actively draining natural resources and using the local population as a cheap labor source. this was causing major protest and led to a rebellion in 19 o 4 the hero, and now my drive is rebuild against german colonial rule. kaiser wilhelm the 2nd was fully determined and ordered to suppress the rebellion with the up most severe a date against the inhabitants of nam may be germany through it's 15000 well

equipped army all around the country. concentration camps were built in humane medical experiments over citizens were conducted within the period of 4 years. the german scaled up to 60000 people, among which they were 80 percent of the here railroad tried and 50 percent of the number drive. the events in south west africa are called the 1st genocide of the 20th century. and not without reason are compared to the holocaust just 2 decades later after the massacre in nam may be hitler's the solve unit boat on the same brown colonial uniform which force the world into the chasm of the 2nd world war. the pope wanted to come here since i was 12, when my grandfather told me that his mom came from russia that we were,

i was part russian. i didn't plan on saying this long. i was gonna look around. i was gonna see if it was for me, but then i came and then i was like, i remember when i go home, i've never been happier in life than i am here in russell. the i've only lived here a few months, but i wanted to tell you what fascinates me about russia and share the stories of other foreigners who lived here. like jay who worked as a chef and now raises goats and mix cheese in the countryside series. like chad who has been granted political asylum because he's being persecuted by the f. b. i. us, embassies. and for countries that come after me it's, it's wild like an american family that recently moved to russia with 6 children. i've never felt safe for land tire life then living here,

the sweet, the nice the . what so striking. so me is this contrast in california where some people are. so rates and other people are barely making. that's a, that's a call cost of the whole united states that there's worried about for, for, i don't know, $400.00 people that have all the more income than all of us together. you do think there's a gap is becoming smaller or is growing all it's growing? i don't know. they only want a handful of people controlling everything they want to keep people under their under this, under your son's control people's, that's a way of controlling people. you know, power and money. everyone should have had these housing fields, you know, health care, education close, you know, stuff, you know,