Skip to main content

tv   Direct Impact  RT  August 26, 2024 2:30pm-3:01pm EDT

2:30 pm
you really don't want to show you guys in many ways i can see that the other stock says to the energy in, in the components, right? i just wanted to ukraine when i'm not sure. and i show you how much you can see this to being portrayed very different when it comes to the ukraine, russia, russia last night. why did these, these, you create the much support to support it by the west, the media. that if you can see there's so much humans work $714.00 to the situation of the police, but not at all. what you still do. when i did the middle east, where she a muslims across the region have joined to the are buying pilgrimage, important. the religious event marks the 40th day of morning for one of this nomic branches founding fathers in mom, who's same worshippers flocked into the policy of carmella and
2:31 pm
a rock more than 21. 1000000 c, a muslims affordably took part in the pilgrimage. many of them openly displayed their support for gaza memory. sions in a ron, welcome to thousands of attendees. they also made support for palestinians of focal point in the event. crowds of people shouted that they will fight until the war in casa is over. the right to stay with our to international have next on direct impact. rick sanchez, looks back at the dnc r k juniors comp endorsement and much more by the the harbor buddy. i'm in sanchez. this is the week interview to the 1st ever federal ban on proud price gauging
2:32 pm
unsuitable. i'm a better looking person, said tom, allow america's wedding and the world better off or. well, presidential politics is finally taking center stage and america, and there is a whole lot of bluster who's winning how much sanchez? let's do this. the . so i think it was robin williams, interestingly enough, who once said that politics is nothing but satire and i, i can tell you that it's ever, if ever, that has been true in u. s. presidential politics. it's this week, and it's only going to get worse or better. depends on how you look at it, i guess joining me now the go through the week's events and the top stories is always to be critical hours, but like radio, garlic, nixon,
2:33 pm
garland. let's get going, man and i, i think of spectacle broadway show um satire. i mean, they're all approp appropriate. let's begin with donald trump. you now you, one thing in the case of donald trump, it is important, right? you would think that his opponent is not laying out policies and that many of his policies are generally popular with a lot of americans. but then he would take that as an, as an opportunity that hammer away that what most people think would be winning issues for him. and i give them a lot, right? you would say that he would be talking about his economy. you would think you were talking about foreign affairs, specifically his record and plans, if he, if and when he becomes president, right? no. as the former president appears to be hell bent on on see mean, angry in general and talking about things. most people don't even know about this
2:34 pm
greek. he started, he said he was gonna talk about the economy. he talked about. so feel or run. mean i know her, you know her, but you know, t o as in that machine that people used to use to record stuff. and he talked about couple of harris just looks again. but i say that i am much better looking than her . i think i'm i'm a veteran person, said tom. i mean, i don't know, maybe i'm wrong, garland and i want to hear what you have to say about this. but i would think that his advisors must be watching that and wanting to scratch their eyes out with frustration your take. and i think at times i'd be to, um donald trump is the, the michael spinks of politics. and here's what i mean. well, i used to watch box him, i could speak to the orthodox, he did everything wrong, he didn't move, move are right. he looked awkward and he was championed for many, many years. i think donald trump is on worth. and doctors,
2:35 pm
i understand donald trump is to also recognize that people are sick and tired of orthodox politicians and the traditional dogma. i think also, and this is critical to understand if you look at the democratic party and their rhetoric, one of the things that you understand is that they've lost their connection to the comment or to the average person. yeah, the guy that works in a transmission shop, right? i think what donald trump does inadvertently all be that. but i think what he does is he talks to that guy and that guy hears somebody that when he's working on a car seat or sticking out from the car, his buddies leaning against the pickup truck and they're just chat. and i think donald trump trump is real successful in accessing the consciousness, accessing a connection to the regular working class, people that the democrats at law. so i think it's successful for him in a different way in a non non political way in a social way. maybe, oh, listen, you are absolutely 100 percent correct. that the democratic party used to be the
2:36 pm
party, the working man today is and then leave this party extremely leaders party. just look at the people digits of the world and the others that they put up there. but nonetheless, it's gotta be making his advisors. mr. trump's advisors. crazy because of the opportunity that's out there. that is a former president focused on his experience on his economy and on other differences with that of miss harris. he could probably score big, especially with independence because you're right. he's got the common guy, but he needs to get those people in the middle who are still unsure. so she's giving them some huge openings by the way. let me give you an example of what we're talking about here. she, as she's refused to do interviews right. and she has refused so far to talk about her specific policies, the media finally shane her into doing so. so she announces she's going to get this springs on her economic plan. however, doesn't go so well, especially when she spoke about how she would stop corporations from price gouging
2:37 pm
. the 1st ever, federal ban on proud price gauging on food is the . what does it say when someone is reading a word, but they can't pronounce? tells me 2 things. you didn't write it, you don't know what it means and you've got nothing to do with the idea of it. am i wrong that it is that you're a 100 percent of what it tells me that it's nothing but a narrative. it also says that this person has no intention to move forward with these policies. this is what this is what we can say, and we can put this out. it sounds great. and then if we're able to, we will do what we did in 2020 with, we're going to give you a public option. we're going to address student loans. we're going to take marijuana and i'll schedule what we're gonna meet on and on and on. they did absolutely none of them and they intend to do none of them now. and i think people intuitively are picking that up. and those who are watching her looking for policy
2:38 pm
is when they hear things like that. i think they also understand that they're dealing with the person who, you know, it's just as they say they know the music, but they don't know the words. yeah. speaking of the music and the words, every 4 years, both political parties in the united states put on this show, right? and if you're wondering what a show has to do with politics or why there's only 2 bodies, for example, then you're beginning to understand what is horribly wrong is garlan. this is explaining and articulating well, i would add about what's going on with the american politics. we, we told you about the republicans and now it's, the democrats turn. usually on the 1st side of the convention, not a whole lot of people are watching. right. and that's where they put people that they really don't want to put on, but they feel like they have to put them on. like in this case, the president of the united states name a country in the world. that doesn't say we're the leading nation of the world without america. not a joke. think about it. i'm be literal to delay the world rather than united states
2:39 pm
of america. well guess what? america's worthy and the world better off or, you know, talking about an old message from an old guy, he's screaming at the top of his lungs throughout the entire speech. and how the united states has to run and rule the world. nobody else has a right to do so. you know, it just, it, i know he's trying to sound patriotic, but that's not patriotism. it seems self centered. it seems braggadocio as it seems like, you know, just pure head gemini and, and i'm just thinking, i'm wondering what you think as you hear the, what most of the other countries in the world are the other leaders of countries in the world here when they're hearing grandpa telling them that they have no right to determine their own future and that he does, the us tells them what to do kind of thing. it's just why, why go there? i think the other countries here and think,
2:40 pm
how can i get in bricks as fast as possible? we can because these people have lost touch with reality. and the other thing is it gets back to what i say before, they've lost touch with the, with the common man and woman. you know, people are concerned when it comes down to a year after year people vote their pocketbooks the other night. what is it $91.00? 8, george h. w bush had a 90 percent approval rating. he lost a year later because we were in a recession right now. you know, i saw something that i never thought that i, i couldn't believe my eyes. i was riding to the beach last week and i saw there was a little group of people on the side, the road black as a blackened in and they were selling, you know, ribs and chicken in scope, chicken cook and stuff on the grill. yeah. they've started trump signed the giant trump signed of all the huge trump sides all around them. i never thought i was not working with most of the time in the black community. even people that are going to vote for trump when you ask of their claim. they're not, but for that, so i think it comes down to just regular old. what,
2:41 pm
what are these guys doing on the side of the road? they were trying to make a few extra bucks to make ends meet more they. what do you make by the way of the fact that the democratic party is starting to look now like it happened on purpose? they did everything possible to make sure that joe biden did not speak in primetime . and some people in the binding camp are now complaining about it because you know, it's funny how it didn't happen. the next day when mister obama spoke, or the next day when mister clinton spoke. yet they, they say that it is because too many people were applauding and it pushed everything back. so what do you make of that? i mean, it's almost like, it's kind of cool though, you know, but i think it's obvious and to be quite frank, i think it's why is i think they were apprehensive. they understood the job. i didn't, you know, whenever the top stair step on within minds at any given time to get hung up on some words, he could make some egregious error that would, you know, reveal just the bad condition that he's in and people would start asking the
2:42 pm
obvious question why is this guy still president, if we can't even run for president? so i think it was, they were doing this smart thing. you gotta hide this guy for the next couple of months until they, you know, however, it works and they can get them out of the way. yeah. so, uh, i must be cruel to be kind of shakespeare once wrote. i mean, it is necessary and they did it, although boy, it just, it, it look, it look bad. it look bad. yeah. that it reveals the decrepit state of this, this party. and if they've got a present and say they've got a hide and they've got a presidential candidate that they also have to hide because she doesn't do any interviews. yeah. you know, donald trump can talk about anything, what's in an interview, it or whatever he gets in front of the cameras out in campbell harris. i mean, you can't find her, she's worse than joe biden to 2020 when he resided in the delaware basement. yeah, well, it's going to take too big to thank to the democratic convention. let's talk about that. it seems to go off without a hitch. this is post by midnight. it gets,
2:43 pm
it kept grapple up late. so that's me, i apologize. well, it seem like the person who made the best fits for cala harris was a kind of is expected brock obama. and of course the loyal as man who are there because these are the remember these people at this convention. they're all the cool a drinkers. they ate it up. we do not need 4 more years of bluster and bumbling and chaos. we had seen that movie before. and we all know that the sequel is usually worse. the . the better story. we already say what you want. the man still has some great oratorical skills. the only person who i think watching,
2:44 pm
going back and forth between watching baseball and watching the convention because it's my job, who i think gave a better speech than brock obama so far was his wife. i think michelle obama just hit it out of the park, your political theater and political oratory. but that's what this is. you're not expecting breakthrough news. uh, you know, leads or anything like that here? correct. you know, well, yeah, obviously obama speech was about pushing the message. i mean, he attacked trump, and afterwards we saw a obama skewered from that all the news. and then he told me, he said things that the, by the administration that has no relationship to the, by the administration. i mean, to say that, you know, we need 4 more years of this wonderful by and, and if things a american association and things were so bad when trump was in, it causes people to reflect on that particular issue. and let's face it, one of the things that we hear in the community. one of the things that get people
2:45 pm
get back to is the prices weren't there under trump. i'm not saying trump did it. i'm just saying that, you know, he was there when it happened. so i just think they are the, you know, people tend to, there's an argument amongst those who support the democrats, that they're ahead and this there's to lose, etc. i don't think that's true. i think they were really bad shape and i think that the, all the discussions about the rhetoric did they use isn't going to help them. because in the end, people aren't going to vote on rhetoric. they're going to go into the voting booth and they're going to go to practice and no way the democrats when, if people are building their pocket. so generally speaking, i think you're incorrect in terms of what the polls are showing us. the polls are showing right now that cala harris has taken a lead. not a big lead still within the margin of error, but a lead compared to where this was, when biden was in it. it is a dramatic difference in the election. now i know what you're thinking. yeah, those are polls polls, james, are only in the moment. i'll tell you what can change things. what you and i are
2:46 pm
about to talk about when we come back from the break. and that is our f k junior, robert f kennedy junior, is about to quit the race. and it sounds like he's going to north donald trump and he may even take a position in the trump administration. how's that gonna affect us? let's talk about that. we'll be right back the,
2:47 pm
the, the the, the
2:48 pm
the, hey, let's get back into it. i'm rick sanchez, along with the garland mix and talking about what's going on this week and most of it politics, politics, politics, right? a can there be an r f k junior difference entering into this rate? so r f k junior? uh, uncle of the president and son of a man who would have been president if you haven't been assassinated. prominent member of one of the most famous democratic families in us, history will quit,
2:49 pm
the race is no longer going to be the 3rd candidate, possibly endorse donald trump. and be here, who's running may tell it. it's happening because he's been treated horribly. i mean nasty, probably the democratic party s d n c aligned pack that was created specifically to take us out has spent millions of dollars to take us out. they have unfortunately turned us into us boiler and, and we don't want to be as boiler. we want it to, and we wanted a fair shot at the dnc, made that impossible for us. they have the band shadow band as kept us up. stages manipulated polls use lothair against us, sued us in every possible se, leave even planted insiders into our campaign to disrupt it and to create actual legal issues for us. but that's,
2:50 pm
that's amazing to hear her tell it. not that it should surprise anybody because we kind of knew it was happening. it's the 1st time i've seen it articulated in that way. and now, you know, we're seeing some causality as a result of what, what do you make garland of this situation and cool? how much will it help drop if at all a couple of things. number one of the new york times reported a week or so ago that the, that our of k junior campaign had in fact approach the harris team to discuss the same thing with him. and this harris dean simply said, we're not interested. we don't want to talk to you, you know, they, it's a very binary way of thinking, the democratic party right now. you know, it's kind of like george w bush, either you with us or you with a terrorist. so they rejected him and he moved, going apparently to another to, to the trump campaign, to trump campaign wisely has accepted his offer. and i think it's, um, it's gonna work out well. i think he brings credibility amongst a different set of independence that had the truck that the truck campaigned,
2:51 pm
didn't have that access to and you know, in a close race which if we look at the last few races, they've been fairly close up a couple of percent i think this guy, 85 or 60 percent. well, what happens if he brings 3 percent? do trump in a couple of different states mix all the difference in the world in a close race? this could be a, you know, a drug. this could have tried a dramatic effect on the race. you know, i was thinking about this and i was having a conversation with one of the smartest guys i know. and one of my dearest friends about this yesterday and, and i, i, we were going back and forth on this. my concern is that the people who are going to vote for him, we're going to vote for him because they hate trump. and they hate bite, and they hate harris, and they hate anybody who smells of an official democratic or republican party. so moving them to one of those places, whether it's trump or whether it's uh, whether it's a hair is, is not going to be an easy feat. many of them might actually rejected unless it's
2:52 pm
handled just right. it all it is is i'm quitting and i want you to go support this guy. they're going to go no, nope, x. that's the reason we're in the middle is because we don't want to support anybody. so i wonder how that dynamic is going to work. you have some thoughts on that? yeah, and it depends on how far he goes. number one, is he going to go in the stuff bridge? a truck? is he going to make advertisements for stop? is he going to investigate me for drugs? are they going to do something very detailed research, which i would expect as a very detailed research to find out where he has the most now of which states he has the most support and of those states, you know, with the polls to see which people would transfer over so they could be very direct and very in, in, in going after the people that could be, that would be the most effective in making a difference. and, you know, it's in a lot of these states, okay. he's got 5 or 6 percent. if you could get 2 of them out of that, if he could get a 3rd of those, if he could get 25 percent of those,
2:53 pm
that's enough cheat based on the last election. that's enough to change everything . that's bigger percentage the j b, that's the problem. so far is the go to some of the bowls that we've been say, which, which i think have been a little bit unfair because of the media criticism of him, which has also been unfair. but nonetheless, it makes you wonder, i wonder if he's thinking about putting them in that slot instead, but that would be total conjecture and i'm not gonna ask you to do that. okay. so what i would, i, i will say this, there were reports very early before he picked the campaign that he had discuss that with our as gauges. and you're in our stage in your head said no. so in hindsight, if those reports are true, in hindsight, he may be looking back say i probably should have took it, but it doesn't matter. now we are where we are and i think our f k junior, if it's specific and targeted based on really, really accurate research. yeah. can make a difference in a ohio and a pennsylvania in, in north carolina. definitely. i want to finish off with brock obama. i want to go back to his speech by the way, that there's no doubt that there's something infectious and seemingly genuine about
2:54 pm
his oratory. the guy can talk right. the gray hair doesn't hurt either, but behind a smooth veneer, really smooth veneer. there's a question of intellectual honesty. is he really being straight with americans or, or he may be just being a little intellectually dishonest stuff. i say that because when i watched them say this, i thought about that we shouldn't be the world's policeman. and we can't replicate every client and then just as in the world of what america can be and must be a forest for good discouraging conflict and disease promoting human rights protecting the planet from climate change. depending. we don't want to go to most americans, but you know, who doesn't believe that the rest of the world. every single thing that he said is
2:55 pm
the complete opposite of the way that many of the countries in this world are now looking at the united states. yes, that may have been true in the forty's, and maybe the fifty's to a certain extent. but today he almost seems full hardy saying those things because i could make an argument against almost every single one of them. and i'm not saying he should be out there, bad melting america. we all love this country. but it's just a lack of realism in, in, in that statement. you know. yeah. and in particular, in light of the fact that outside of the convention center, though they pushed them far away there. a lot of people out there who are loyal, many of who have been loyal democrats for years or very unhappy with the foreign policy there. people certainly been around happy with gaza and they want to immediate ceasefire. there are people out there holding up banners about ukraine. there are people who are unhappy with the by the ministrations, aggressive, militaristic, foreign policy. that the alignment with literally the terror terrace groups such as
2:56 pm
isis and of course of neo nazis and ukraine. so what he said does not align with reality, ended up in the line with a significant number of the people in the democratic party coalition for peaceful minded. joe biden came in in the beginning and said, we're going to return to diplomacy again. all lies. and you know, we're doing the show before she speaks, but i'm going to ask you a question about something that's in the when shall we say that cala harris may come out tonight? and she might say that she a breached she has been able to reach an accord with israel to agree to a cease fire in gaza. do you think that would happen? and do you think it would have an impact? you know, i don't, i think what's going on. but tony blinking really is that he is there to give the, to the, you know, to make it look like he's working. and so that they can continue. you know, amc said the, um a divide inherited ministration of before so, you know,
2:57 pm
paraphrasing is working tirelessly to get a ceasefire in a, in, in the, at least. i mean, most people see that by the administration as benjamin netanyahu was lawyer, rather than and not biased group. and i don't think they're really pushing for, they just want to give the appearance of it so that she can continue on with a narrative. we're working for a cease fire. certainly they're not really. yeah, they're not really trying to get. it's almost as simple those that well and the precedent unfortunately is not good because we've heard that before from mr. barton and we've heard it before for so many others and then in the end, after they propose it and there's discussion of it and people think it's going to happen. it doesn't happen because when it gets in front of the been it them. yeah. so he says something to the effect of, well, how do you guys think you are telling us what to do? just because we're taking your money, it doesn't mean that we have to do what you say. and that seems to be the way this is being run. can she somehow change that will?
2:58 pm
will she be different because she comes from an immigrant parents a different background. she's not an old anglo saxon guy. i don't know. i don't know. i mean, you have to be seen, you know, i guess we give her the benefit of the doubt if that's the case and she does win the presidency. you know, i don't give her the benefit to do that because she's running for president. here's what i say. you are with your record says you are and she does not have a record. and if you go to her website, i invite anyone to go to campbell that harris's website right now and look for any policy positions. absolutely nothing. it's just the store for merchandise, which is indicative of something. and that is that she represents factions that the ruling elite and the deal cons, and that she will be a conduit for power and that those factors will tell her what to do. the fact that there is, there are no policies on our website, is in fact a message to us. they called and said they're coming. you just have to be patient. a great point. wait another 4 years. it's a great conversation and,
2:59 pm
and this is important stuff. thanks so much problem. we appreciate you shop, remember to always be looking uh outside of your own box because the truth is we like to say they don't live in boxes. i'm rick sanchez, will be looking for you next time. the, [000:00:00;00] the, what is part of the, the employee would post good. isn't the defense you of us entered in the word?
3:00 pm
or is it something deeper, more complex might be present? good. let's stop without pieces. let's go out of the as the friend says that arrested the telegram theo, in connection with the 12 criminal charges including simplicity and drug trafficking, and the distribution of sexual content on his platform based with global outrage and accusations of censorship. paris climes cromwell drugs, case is not politically motivated. ukrainian m p 's, who voted against banning the orthodox church and was and forced to flee. so someone trying to kid up a timely involved in europe. and the protest arrives in burkina faso against the cranes assistance development group in west africa.
3:01 pm
the

6 Views

info Stream Only

Uploaded by TV Archive on