the, the outgoing nature, general secretary stilton bird claims a russian victory in the ukraine. complex is the biggest risk to the us led military blog. this is all the more reason russia will achieve its goals in this proxy war the, the rick sanchez here is a direct impact and this is what we're going to be talking about. and also the congresswoman tells me, gathered both our former progressive democrats, who have embrace trump, and also means increasingly into conspiracy theories in recent years. cuz let's see here, why is abc news calling tulsa gabber to just the regular news report? a conspiracy theorist. i'm gonna tell you why i'm or can't just,

let's do this thing. the . so we're going to begin to show today with the great debate may be great. maybe not, donald trump has said that he agrees to go ahead with the original time and place that he had scheduled with president biden. but of course, by this role will now be played by vice president couple of harris. it's going to happen tuesdays the 10th on a b, c, television, television network that mr. trump is accusing of being biased against him. ironically, in this report, the very thing they do when they do this report announcing this debate, they seem to prove him right. comes this morning as his campaign is highlighting the 2 former democrat, some joins the trump transition team r f k junior,

coming over just days after he dropped out of the race and endorse trump. and also the congresswoman told me, gathered both our former progressive democrats, who have embrace trump and also means increasingly into conspiracy theories in recent years. yeah, there is a conspiracy. theories are not cases, they're crazy people. i mean, what i mean it's, it's, it's almost like they can't help themselves. i mean, look, it's perfectly fair to criticize tulsa gab, or you could criticize her for her anti war positions. fine, if you have a different opinion, you can explain that. but to suggest that she some kind of conspiracy not that's biased reporting. there's no question about that. i don't know. manila, what, what do you, i mean what i saw that i just kind of like jumped out of my chair. i said really that it wasn't like they were doing a bio on her and you think it was just a regular report announcing this debate and just a comment. you know, there, she's a conspiracy theorist of the last job or what, but obviously, rick,

all of mainstream media takes a biased plant either to the red team or to the blue tier, outside of fox or, oh, and there really aren't any networks that cater to conservatives. abc, i would say, falls squarely in line with the democratic party, talking points. and when it comes to testing gap, or, i mean the fix has been in against hulsey since she threw her hat in the ring. in the 2020 election cycle, they called her uprooting puppet and a side apologise. now a conspiracy theorist, and i don't think the audience even need me to outline how abc has frame donald trump over the years. i'm not sure they've ever uttered a kind word about him over any of the years at a b, c. nobody. not even a guest. so he is correct in his skepticism, over the network, hosting the upcoming debates that, that they probably aren't going to be very kind. thank you. don't you know what i think it is to, i've always said this

a bad reporting is lazy reporting. that's the difference. it's so easy to just go with the crowd, the crowd says pulsing cupboards and not k. so i'm just gonna, i'm gonna write my piece that i'm going to put in that. yeah, she's a conspiracy. there is without. just all you'll have to do is go back and say, okay, let me, let me find out what they're talking about. let me research or let me see. but that, that's the problem we have in television today. we got lazy as reporters, like whoever the hell this woman is, who just model the report. she probably spent about an hour and a half doing or make up for her stand up. and then she spent about a minute 15 or a minute and a half. well, working on her piece and that's how you get the china is the, i'm sorry, but i'm just, you know, i, i'm just tired of it again. there's plenty to criticize with delta gabbert. there was a donald trump, but don't do lazy reporting where you just go out and say, oh he just announced this new person is going to help me get paid. her name is also gabbert and all i can say about her is, she's a conspiracy not that's horrible. it's in the lazy,

it's bias and it's going to happen. so anyway, yeah, look, we have your, your, you're pulling the curtain back. we're pulling the card back on the wizard of oz and how this tv stuff works and, and you're absolutely right to, to criticize the reporter for, for just jumping the bandwagon. instead of doing the critical work or legs being or perhaps the, the, the opposite voice if, if it's needed they're, they're lazy and nobody checks on him. and that's a problem. by the way. there's something else here, a play democrats who are suddenly very hawkish as you pointed out. recruiting neil com, republicans over to their side like former congressman adam kensington. while mr. tripp ironically, is doing just the opposite. he's recruiting the anti media cons, the anti war democrats by kennedy. i'd like to also gabbert who we were just talking about. so here's gabbert, after she was introduced by trump this weekend. and here she is explaining why she's supporting donald trump. we saw this through his 1st term in the presidency

when he not only didn't start any new wars, he took action to de escalate and prevent wars. he exercises the courage that we expect from our commander in chief and exhausting all measures of diplomacy. having the courage to meet with adversaries, dictators, allies in partners alike in the pursuit of peace right now. well, i just praise tells the governor defended her. now i'm going to criticize her, or just to be fair. well, the comparison of trump and binding for example, and or harris is i think, favorable for trump when it comes to foreign policy in general, right? in general, her description of him making him sound like he's some kind of mother teresa, who's like a piece neck or something is to say the least a little bit overstate. wouldn't just say, yeah, it's fair critters criticized hosting gabbert as well. i mean, all, all of these candidates are in perfect,

in some aspect or another. but the question here is, is trump the better choice on foreign policy? i mean, i don't know, let's examine some of the key points to his 1st go around in the oval office. no new wars fact. but then he droned iran general cost them solar, many kind of started, which kind of started a war he assassinated a for later. i mean, right. then he entertained the idea of withdrawing the us from nato. that's in fact, but then he wanted to withdraw us troops from syria, but quote, steal the oil, can't we steal the oil? it's also a back, installed the new president, and then as well, there's that. then he says he, he likes that a respect, bodamer put it okay, great. he went out of his way to make nice with kim jong own, but then he went and started a trade war with china. so depending on what your definition of what

better on foreign policy means. i mean, better is, i guess i'm the i of the beholder. you know, it better is better, is less worse. a well do. it's not a whole world way. this is no longer who will do well, it's a who will do the least amount of damage. and i would say that judging across the board with mr. trump and his policies, he probably from a foreign policy standpoint, i would agree with tulsa gilbert, that he would do less damage, but he's not mother theresa, and he's not saving around sitting cool by on the white house. all right, here's something that i may be turning into a trend sort of this yet. another country is now coming out today and saying it will no longer be supplying ukraine with weapons. paula of all countries, poland. i didn't see this coming, which used to be uh, one of your crimes best these. i mean, they were like this, you know,

freaking crack. literally one of their sponsors. that was, well, they're joining other countries now in the region like hungry in slovakia and say it's a mix say no more weapons for you. there it is. media reports like this one by the bbc and the headline that reads paul are no longer supplying weapons to ukraine. a mid grain role are quote in poland, prime minister, when he says his country will now focus on its own security rather than the security of ukraine. the pm put out that statement right there. his name is matthew's mom. i can do this, more of the etc, is quoted as saying we are no longer transferring weapons to ukraine because we are now arming poland with more modern weapons. by the way, the article also points out that the poll is government seems to have a real beef with ukraine's mr. landscape for something he said recently at the

united nation. so, so let's he goes to united nations and apparently he bad mouth. those 3 countries, including bolt, so lensky attacked hunger. he attacks all bach, any attack poland by making fun of them in a speech. so let's get referred to the 3 nations as quote, political theater, making a thriller from grain. the little polls didn't like that. apparently they're so angry about what's the landscape mister soleski said. they saw me under ukrainian and bassett, or to warsaw where they then filed with him a formal complaint against ukraine. wow. know, look, what is this green scuffle all about? can you bring us up to date on this? what's going on a, rick, i also got a wonder did, did zaleski, open the, the un talk by making like a, how many polish people does it take to screw in a light bulb. they drove a great week by what we did that goes okay. okay. fair enough. but okay, well rick,

remember all that talked about ukraine being the so called bread basket of the world even though. 1 they're actually a far, far distance 2nd behind rush. remember all that to you. uh huh. that's really what all of this is actually about. and the publish pm sort of accidentally let that slip. when he said that pulling was no longer supply and ukraine with arms. the president andre do quickly swooped in, trying to clarify, say, no, no, no, we just aren't giving you credit, the new stuff, the new arms. and i am paraphrasing, but he basically said, we're keeping the new stuff for ourselves. but we'll give you credit the old hand me downs from the old soviet era stuff. so this ro between ukraine and their neighbor really boils down to brass tax over farming. many countries in the you are super angry over ukrainian grain in port flooding. there now domestic markets driving down prices for domestically grown goods, much like we hear about the same,

so illegal migrants driving down wages. so what you're saying is, if you're a polish farmer, the way you just described it, i'm sitting here working my butt off every day to try and grow this grain. and my government say, we don't need your grain, we're going to import jeep grand from ukraine and they're got, well what, what, what, what, what, what are, how am i going to feed my family? and that's the push back they're getting that they were getting import tax breaks as well. where's the, the local domestic farmers in the you were not receiving the, the ukraine grand was actually go into the market for a lot cheaper. and that's what drove those massive farmers protests across the you just a few months ago the european council had to respond by placing a temporary embargo on outside green imports just to quell the former anger and stabilize out the pricing domestically. now that band has ended, but poland, hungary, of slovak, you have decided to continue with that embargo. and that's what the landscape of mascot is also, ursula vander land, and the landscape now having

a fit and taking his complaint to the w. t. o. and then rick, as you alluded to, poland is actually the 2nd country to kind of issue mix messaging following germany's finance minister that we talked about last week, saying that there is no more money in the coffers for ukraine. d i still cheer leading the efforts to continue the war. get my drift rate. yeah, i, i get it. and by the way, just to put it in the proper framework because, you know, as an american who happens to come from latin america, that's the same argument that a lot of latin american farmers have been making for many years. the reason we have an immigration problem in the united states is because the economies of those countries, honduras guatemala and mexico for years have been destroyed by american farming products which are subsidized. and they pay women to live in america. and that makes them guy used to grow tomatoes in honduras. he's out of business. he's got no

money. he can't live off of what he used to do. so what does he do? he comes to america because he's hungry and he wants to feed his family. you know that that's subsidizing of certain services what poland and it's farmers are feeling that is being done to them because of jeep grain from ukraine is not, that's not the only place where this kind of thing is going on. it happens a different part to the world's. unfortunately, the media never explains us. they've just rather say that, you know, it's a big immigration problem, etc, etc. fascinating, fast, man. that's exactly it. exactly it. well, thank you for taking a screw it their partner. appreciate talking to you and seeing you, and i'll see you again very, very soon, because when we come back, we're going to be joined by uh, well, somebody who's been on the show before. he's got a lot to say, credit pasta. john dula is going to join us from the great state of florida. great state of florida. really? i know that place he's going to be talking about those pesky conspiracy theories stay right there will be right back. the, the look forward to talking to you all

that technology should work for people. a robot must obey the orders given by human beings, except we're so shorter that conflict with the 1st law show alignment of the patient . we should be very careful about our personal intelligence. the point obviously, is to create a trust, rather than fit the various jobs. i mean with artificial intelligence, we have somebody with him in the a robot must protect his phone, existence was alexis the,

the the a welcome back. i'm rick sanchez so much to talk about. certainly when it comes to american politics, one of the things that's happening right now is this great debate that's going to take place. great debate. i say someone in just between the, the vice president of united states and the former president of the united states. and it's happening just as the president introduced some people that are going to be helping his campaign. obviously,

bobby kennedy junior and of course also gabbert as well. tulsa gave what's interesting, she's an interesting, she's an interesting politician to say the least credit post a journal, a drawing just about to talk about this and a whole lot more. um, you know, past uh, when i think of tulsa gabbert, i think of courage. don't get too carried away, i'm not going to get carried away with this courage in the sense that she goes where almost no politician will go. and that is to examine and accurately criticize american foreign policy. and she does the engine does so not so it's like some outside or who just comes in and says, you know, there's what i think of this mean she actually served so you know, she has a little more grab a task when she talks about this, that's the good part about they'll say gabbert, wouldn't you agree? i would totally agree. and that's why i supported or campaign in 2020 been. she

gave us total access as independent journalists to get in there and ask her a lot of these important questions. rec, i didn't know that. i mean, i, as much as i've, you know, studied her and watched her at times. i think she's somewhat of mishandled her own campaign at certain times. but there's no, there's no way you can not look at this woman and see the things that she's done and said and not come away saying it takes a certain amount of courage to be able to do those things. because you know, the forces that use up against their, their, their, on the present strong and even a little bit dangerous. yeah, i would also say that she has the courage to listen, you know, we had access to that came being back in 2020 and a lot of people don't know this, but she provided in the avenue of which we could help her out for that debate. we honestly knew it was coming in that come all there was the target that day. and we were able to create a da ca and in which she was then be able to pick from to use in that debate. but

i've always admired hulsey for having an open door, even when it's tough question. she'll take them, there's a lot of things, i don't agree with the wrong, but a lot of things i do agree with the wrong, but the courage to sit there and take those questions into listen, you can't doubt to hold that against policy because she's always been an open book, you just mentioned something that's very important. bring our audience up to date. those of us uh the we have people watching from all over the world. she had the signature moment in the debate when she took on harris vice president harris. she put over 1500 people in jail for marijuana violations, and laughed about it when she was asked if she ever smoke marijuana. she bought the street on the innocent man from death row until the courts forced her to do so. she kept people in prison be on their sentences to use them as cheap labor for the state of california. and she thought she had the system in place that impacts for people in the worst kind of way. and many to this day

believe that was the moment when vice president today buys, when cala harris's campaign ended, she ended right there on that day. take us through that as well. you know, at the time in 2020 we were part of the, the media that was following her around every single time she had a rally or an event, she would always have a press gaggle. and then she would open up the doors to allow any journalist to walked into the room, ask her questions and whatnot. but at the same time, you know, she had taken a liking to a lot of us, who would, you know, give her a lot of information. and she provided in the avenue where she would hear the grievances about kamala harris, and then use those against her in the debate. so that's what happened. we had created a da ca, of sorts, and it was a bunch of independent journalists that feel that the ca and, and sent it over to her. i mean, she's big on research washington automotive audition and let me help you. cuz i think despite the fact that i'm older than you,

i think i remember here's where she nailed her. she looked during the i and she told her that despite the fact that she says that she's for justice and this and that and helping african americans and other minorities, no prosecutor in the state of california has ever been worse when it comes to the punishment. she told out for young african americans and other minorities who had done nothing more than smoked a marijuana cigarette. and she put them in jail for more than a year. and you know, to be the only minority or african american supposedly as a candidate and to have done that doesn't look good. she killed her with that. the . yeah. and, and like i said, she was open to us to let her, you know, educate her on the situation. we were living in california at the time to me and my business partner, fiorella isabella from the combo couch. so we had a lot of information on kamala harris's history. i mean, it was so many other things that she could have just pivoted to, to go after kamala, the fact that kamala actually held prisoners, longer of sentences, to use for free labor. i mean, i think she did,

mentioned that one as well. so i mean, she was open to understanding the people who've been watching and following kamala for quite some time. and that's the great thing about chelsea, grab it, and i think you hit an interesting point. rick, there are a lot of other things that we could be critical about about, you know, as far as the gabbert. right. this is the same old lee z reporting that you see from the main stream media just to attack or is a conspiracy theory. it's getting boring at this point. yeah. what, what, what is, so the way the new presenter as someone who was a bit of a pitbull and was able to take down because she did, she essentially not by herself. but she was a big part of taking that com layers. when come layers was running for president. how then should trump use her in his campaign? what, what, what do you expect to role might be what's a very interesting point because there's a lot of information now unfortunately, i think the trump campaign has handicapped themselves in certain ways because they want to look tough on crime, right?

they add these new little things, image like crime and whatnot. yeah. unfortunately, they can do, or they haven't done, maybe they will maybe tell us, you can break through to them. you will have to attack kamala harris, where she's at a week is, and that's her record as a, as, as a d, a in san francisco, or an attorney general in, in california. so, i mean, i haven't even heard donald trump mentioned the 1st step back. i wish you would, but there is an opportunity here in this debate to really go after kamala harris and separate himself. but him and his campaign have to be willing to do it. and that includes not looking tough on crime because if they want to keep that image over there, they're going to handicapped themselves and really attacking her at a week is point. so yeah, hoping that chelsea could break through and get that trump campaign going. yeah, no, you're right. if you can't come across is thinking or saying or implying, or even suggesting that the only people who commit crimes in the united states or anywhere in the world are minorities, that it's only the immigrants, you know, who get dui is only black people who get to you, why is it just, you know,

again for, for mr. trump as well as for miss harris, they need the middle and you don't get the middle by making negative assertions about any group, whether it's man or women, or anybody else. so i agree with you, but you and i are not the campaign managers here. what do you make of this? this is interesting. i, i alluded to this at the beginning, but no, and i didn't get a chance to talk about this. i am fascinated by this debate. we're mr. trump has agreed to the rules that were originally set for. busy for him and mr. bide, not worked really well to shut off the microphones and then just like by making an absolute you know, mess of himself because he was too old and he just didn't make any sense. but i think in this debate against the, against the vice president harris, it might favor trump to have the microphone turned off as well because it keeps him from doing the thing that you and i were just talking about making assertions about minorities interrupting, which i think will again push back the middle,

the independence. what do you like? yeah, rick, i think you're exactly right. and i also want to take my hat off to you for talking about the fact that a lot of these politicians, whether be on the right or the left, don't talk about the actual causes of migration. what you were talking about, the tomatoes and hun doors is so important because we never talk about why there are so many people coming to the border. but as far as this debate is concerned, yeah, i think that even though kamali harris is a little bit more alert and can find her way off the stage that joe biden couldn't do, so she's still going to hang herself. we see her campaign right now. shielding her from any interviews any push back, any press conference. so i think these rules are good and going to favor donald trump is once again how donald trump decides to go after the middle. and if he stays on this rhetoric where everything is so, is that a phobic? i think it's only going to hurt him. yeah. you know, rick, as well as anybody else. i mean, you're a latin american guy living in south florida. the most of the people that come here,

especially the immigrants from latin america, they are great citizens. they have in the shadows, they don't commit crimes. so this is a false narrative that they're pushing right now and it's only going to hurt them. but when it comes to debate, i think the plan is the same as it was when it was joe biden. let the democrats hang themselves, they have no ideas. they're just throwing out tag lines, bumper sticker points as they will. so i think the plan is the same, and i think it's going to favor donald trump and hopefully he uses some of that towards the gab or juice in that debate. if you were a handling mr. trump, and were his campaign manager a, would you have the debate? would you put for a 2nd debate? and would you agree that it's best if they keep the microphones off? let one person make a statement, then they make a statement, then they make, you know, so it's not a a back and forth thing who wins in a back and forth between those 2. have you thought about that? yes, i have. and the whole thing is whether their microphones are on or off, and i think it all depends on what the kamala harris campaign asked for and

whatever they ask for, let them do it. because that if they fail in this debate, and i think they will, you can say, hey, let's, we play by her rules. we played on her brows on her turf. be this is what her campaign set up and we still beat her. so i don't think there's going to be a 2nd debate risk, i think, after the 1st debate, the kamala harris campaign is going to run for the woods and never getting it again . they're going to try to shield their candidate as much as they can, like they had been some problem. here's their either any challenge, let me, here's a, here's what i think, and i'll share it with you because i like to look at the past to determine what's gonna happen in the future. the last time they had a debate and they just let them freewill. trump got his but handed to him. that's the debate. he lost the bible where he kind of lost and lost his, you know, what? and he started yelling at biting and interrupting biting. and he lost that debate because people saw him is too aggressive and almost mean this last time they didn't allow mr. trump to interrupt biden or biden, to interrupt. mr. trump and trump won that debate by half a mile. now, you know,

he was debating a guy who was, you know, in bad shape, but still, history tells me it's better if trump is discipline in a debate and not allowed to just go nearly really 30 seconds quick response. you hit it on the nose. i mean, the fact is when you can sit back there, allow that opponent to hang themselves. and i think that's something he learned from the 1st debate. the 1st debate he was too much of it and not. and a lot of people were saying, just trump, sit back, be cried, let let joe biden hang himself. i think you're gonna see more of that going forward because it was very successful on the 1st of this debate with biden. and we'll see a lot of that was going to comes to kamala craig pasta. you're doing well, my producers are saying, we've got a go. you and i are talking too much again. uh, there you go, my friend, thank you so much for joining us. we appreciate it. thanks for having me and remember, always to look outside your own box. true, said 11 boxes, as we always say, i say address, and we'll be looking for you next time. the

what is this? think of the continental box. oh, send we in touch with the rest of the world. we're going to relate to the winds in terms of don't nations all in tons of train africa must define what she wants political assets might define are soft cultures, also come define ourselves critically. the cause of your guys, no choice, but to move forward. forward. she when the outgoing nasal general secretary stilton bird claims a russian victory in the ukraine. complex is the biggest risk to the us led

military blog. this is all the more reason russia will achieve its goals in this proxy war the rumors and threats. and there were been if there's been a lot of saber rattling in the direction of people like you on mosque. but the tension aspect of it is something that's completely new. businessman and politicians are left reeling over the prostitution and telegram ceo, pommel durham, in an unprecedented move from paris, which they say put free speech. every crane confirmed was losing its 1st f. 16 fighter jet during a russian missile attack on the country's military side cubes. defense ministry says the western train pilot has died and has shown a lot of this to tracy for those actually launching attacks inside the russian

territory.