and you know, it is really good that that's what i'm famous. director quentin tarantino. he says when it comes to electing couple of harris to hell with democracy, it's just when baby he literally broke our bleed machine here much sketches. let's do this thing. the . so we're going to begin with uh, this uh, sudden nasty feud with between the united states and mexico. where, where mexico is saying that the us and canada should mind its own damn business. literally president uh, oprah door. the president, mexico seems to be saying that the united states had to canada. look, you have no right to involve yourselves in our political affairs. and that's what he says that they're doing and, and because you're doing so he seems to be saying, we are cutting off your investigators. we're no longer going to be dealing with

your advisors to see really j. c. well, the said i had them up in the low cost of young lucas time, my little place in my life was, you know, doing the hello a why is there a bass that are telling us what's good or what's bad in our country? that's not your job. it's our country, you seems to be say, right. so what's going on here? what is mexico doing that is so wrong, but it has the united states and canada screaming at mexico about it. and that it apparently, according to the united states and canada, it has to stop because if not, it will be the end of the democracy as we know it if they continue to do it right. by the way, my own bias about this, whenever i hear my country or any country for that matter, complain about

a lack of democracy somewhere. my like bullcrap antennas go straight up, right up democracy of socialism, fascism of actually fascism authoritarianism, and most of those other isms are usually nothing more than bludgeoning tools that are used by governments and demagogues to frighten them to see rather than in form . okay. sorry i had to get that out. that's my take. whenever i hear people saying someone is a communist or someone is a socialist or someone is a fascist or democracy this in democracy that but let me continue. let me set this up for you. the guy in the ridiculous white house that you're about to see, is he a bassett or to mexico? his name is ken salazar, for the record i know can. i've worked with him on a bunch of stuff known him for many years. as a journalist, when he was a senator from colorado, he's a politician and has always allowed himself to be a bit of a tool. but here is reading this script that seems to be making mexico

very angry at him at the us and canada. tlc. uh, it looks you on the next uh the quizzes represent that won't be eligible for the info. see, and i'm in the demo class. yeah. they may go into the rest the on the classic one on the s this that also needles vehicle. you kind of have a whole, there's demick. what can we have for level the cn a vivid toneta less than one of us is that on december cancel that we see i see fort valley. see them. you know, if this will get them. i'd like to see on the left. what do you think? i know the story is a little confusing. so here's what's going on. mexico has a problem with corruption. top, not a secret to anybody, right? so it wants to change the way it's federal judges are chosen. what the mexican

government wants to do is make sure the judges are elected by the people. the us says that would politicize the elections and it would invite corruption. wait, aren't they already corrupt? yes, they are. another thing, given what is going on right now with our own supreme court and the applications they are being bought and sold by billionaires. are we, is our country are politicians in any place right now to be criticizing another country for their traditional system. i'm not a legal expert, but just looking at it from a broad, given a choice between someone who is elected and owes his or her allegiance to the will of the people. as mexico seems to want to do with this reform, or someone who is selected. and oh, is there a legions to corporations and government bureaucrats? i would take my chances with the people,

every time in perfect as elections may be. i get it. now ask for a president over door being angry that the united states should not be complaining about this. i disagree with him. look, i'm not one to not criticize governments including our own, criticize our own state department from time to time for going off on these far off dictates and places like u iraq and ukraine, which most americans couldn't even find out a map, probably 99 percent of americans couldn't find on a map, but i do think we have a right to engage when it comes to a country that's literally right, right next door to us and is our number one training partner. so on the one hand, i find the criticism, kind of weird. let me bring manila and middle. i think what i get in the united states is telling mexico we don't want you to reform your traditional system right now that your digital system is appointed by politicians and such like we do here

with our federal judges and mexico wants to change those in the united states is freaking out about mexico wanting to change that. i don't get it. why it seems like an over reaction. why is the united states so angry about the united states, about mexico changing how it chooses, its federal judges. so it was so a couple of things are at play here, rick. so let's, let's go through them one by one. first m lo is on his way out, claudia, shine bomb has been elected. she's coming in and she's what they say has been kind of groomed by him for years within the priority there of, of the same party, the more than a party. so she'll probably govern the same way and probably has the same views as over door. so in alice case, he's on his way out and he's learning all the bridges and the boats along the way. it's to hell with whatever anybody thinks he's going to say what he wants to say at this point. that's kind of the stage that he's got as

a lame duck. so i'm on team ablow here, where he's saying, hey, united states bought out even if our corruption is corrupting the corruption that you choose to corrupt in our country, right? so what they want, but i'm sure what productive history is, the tractor bodies say back to my question. okay, i get all the ammo. there's corruption made president. why that there? why does the united states not last there? go ahead. the reason the corruption against the corruption of the corruption is the problem is because i'm going to say one country china. and because of this new, the policy that has replaced nafta. as you recall a couple of years ago under president trump, which is called the t mac, t m e c. it is that new us mexico, canada deal. that is all about duty free and tear us. and china comes into play here because of one car company called b y d. they have become mexico's largest automotive car market

o is b y b and they are now the 7th largest automotive industry in the world. and the problem here is, if the chinese get a foothold in the mexican market, what does it have to do it? judges, us officials or us officials are afraid that all the money from china is going to further push through the policies that they want, including, you know, the judges that are not then selected by us money and us, influenced by way of the politicians who select the judges, they're all it is here is a. okay, so i think what you're saying, scramble. so i think what you're saying is, the reason the united states wants the system to remain the same is because under the present system, the united states and canada have a say have a hand in influencing or even choosing who those judges are. once it's

a real election for them, they will not be able to choose those people that 6. that's what that's exactly right. and they're afraid that they're losing their grip not only to the people of mexico, but to business interest by way of china, and that china will be creeping into the us markets as well by way of mexico. so the us is really trying to clamp down and strengthen it, strangle hold on it's southern neighbor on its ability to control the judges. so forget about all that other stuff. i mean, really, it's all about making this all over, all of that. okay. speaking of democracy, let's, let's talk about quitting guarantee. now. a good price. uh, one of the best film directors in the entire world says, my son and a few other people i know who are film geeks, he says and has come out and say it and very interesting terms. that when it comes to make sure that cala harris gets elected to hell with democracy de is asked if it's right, the candidate harris is so rehearsed that she's not talking about our platform that

she's not doing news conferences that she's not doing any interviews with reporters and here is what quitting teran tino says, listen, it's just about can winning and it doesn't matter how we look. we're at this moment . it's about getting winning. right. this is above getting winning. yeah. now it is . it's all mad. think dash, and she is running and she's not stopping to fill stumble. i mean, i want and there's nothing wrong stopping this. i'm going to vote for any way, no matter what she says, i'm just do with your videos that don't go. no, he's going to vote for her anyway, no matter what the hell. she says she can come out tomorrow and say, i'm a fascist and i eat babies. and i'm also a communist on top of that and she's still going to vote for her. and i'm going to start world war 3 tomorrow, and he's still going to vote for no matter what she says. just when baby now, uh here's what's interesting about this, and i think it's worth

a discuss and she was never really elected. she came in last place when she ran for the democratic ticket, which means our own party never picked her. she, she was given the candidacy when biting dropped out, you know, without any competition, okay. it is what it is, right? and now on top of all that she doesn't have to explain her positions or do interviews with anybody. now you have to ask, and it's fair to say, that doesn't sound very democratic as we go around the world telling every other country how they have to be democratic. by the way, it's also a fair question for the trump team to be asking right now, would you ward, if it wasn't so busy trying to do damage control? because of this photo look at this thing. that image is making a lot of people, especially veterans angry. here's what happened. mr. trump did an event drawing to a national cemetery for the soldiers were killed in afghanistan during the pull up . oh, smart, politically for him to do that, by the way. and as a former president, he has every right to do that, delay the reset arlington national cemetery for the soldiers,

but then he may have cross the line, figuratively and literally. that's what we're talking about here. he went with his photographers, the families, to where the soldiers have been recently buried, an area considered more sensitive. and they had this picture taken there. and you know, with the thumbs up and you can see there, i know the words are covering it up, but those are actually where the soldiers are buried. that's their tombstones. they're like people are angry about this because of the optics. they think it was exploitive. i think it was a bad taste. there are reports that mr. trump's handlers got into an altercation with arlington, security officials, bottom line. bottom line is not a good luck, right. and i can't help but ask myself who is minding the store over there? manila, i mean the 1st rule in politics is don't provide your opponent with material that they could use against you. why would they release that picture? why would they take it? i mean, i'm always going to cover for you. if i see something, if i see

a booger on your face, i'm going to tell you, hey, don't put that picture up there. i mean, i, i know i'm trying to understand who to help with this out. why as well, but let's point out that it's also not a good look that joe biden, the current sitting president and commander in chief did not attend the ceremony, the sitting vice president and the person running against donald trump, the spinning vice president comm. yeah, yeah. but now you're still, you're, you're selling yourself part of the circle. so bad luck, i guess what? i mean. well, bad, lucky. yeah, good. so i mean, they're focusing on trump doing what trump always does, which is the stupid same pose in every photo. i mean, just everywhere, this is the next towards the bottom. i know he's on tom is much towards the body. i mean he's, he's just got the same automatic response and the families. if you look at the families, they were happy that he showed up. they were happy and they were doing the same pose as him. so we don't know, you know, they were actually doing like

a celebration of life moment and it's their own private moment. that's fine. the problem that was happening at, at arlington national cemetery, which i've been to that area section 60, the problem, the big scuttlebutt that's happening there is not because he's doing his regular thumbs up cheesy pose. that he always does. it's that that the photos are now being circulated and used within his campaign. and the there's policies there at arlington national cemetery that strictly say, these photos cannot be used for political purposes. and they're saying that this is being used for politics. not so much that, that he's doing the model and so let me ask you, so let me just let me ask you this. if you are hoops candler, you would have said, mr. president, i think it's a good idea for me to go over the next of those dead bodies and take some cheesy pictures with some people with your thumbs up. and then we're going to make sure that picture gets released to everybody so they can see it. when you already had

a great moment were handling the waves before that which was perfectly fine. yeah, i was playing that role. i would have specifically said, let's not smile. can we have a solid moment? you know, in honor of the fallen men and women. exactly. but you know, he just has some bad handlers around him and the photographer could have been like, can we not smile at a great, right? yeah, we judge or the listen. it's politics. we're covering it. we've got to hit both sides. there it is. all right, so thank you. why don't we come back with you? i had security council has just issued a warning to both lebanon, israel. it says both sides need to stop attacking each other because there's a high risk of wide spread conflict. we're going to be talking to a lot to him who's going to be joining us from a route late as a deal political analyst editor in chief there she is. going to be back with her in just a moment. stay right there. the,

the, the,

the hey, welcome back. i'm rick sanchez. i wanna review from an as riley official what he is telling level not. okay. so this person who's quote i'm about to read is israel view on, and bassett or his name is danny dan. and he's talking to the lebanese people and he just said, quote, you and your government have a choice to make, confront, has bought today, or watch as your country is dragged into chaos and destruction. so that's the message, i guess, the official message because he is a us investor to the united states, to the people of loving on about their current situation. a lot to him is joining us now to respond to the she's geo political and list, and she's the editor of g chief of the mentor, uncensored layout. i want to get to that, but before we get to that, we've got some breaking news here. i want you to tell me about i'm,

i'm scouring here the internet and i see that a pro palestinian activists name sarah wilkinson has just been arrested by the police in the u. k. they have rated her home. is she associated with your of, of fact finding and journalistic enterprise? well, yes, uh, 1st of all, thank you for having me over here for taking this and for the subject. and sir, we can send as in fox overlooking reports, or she's been covering the middle east for us, especially before the, the conflict and the genocide that's happening. does all the ongoing on the bi is really on the against the policy is over there. and sort of has the only been as for suppose that of humanity and human aspects of this, but also instruct, supported of the policy and costs for the past 50 years. she has a 61 year old trying mothers boys also invested in june of us. and then after this and today at 7 30 am in the morning and had a remote village where she lives alone. she was rated by the dozens of

n factors and police officers. oh my gosh, more people living in that village. so i just put on that as in charges just because she supports very systems about fine. i mean, come on, give me a break, a 61 year old drum of it was a veteran journalist, an accredited journalist, and the human rights activism and independence. but basically is in the villagers over that it was less than the police, but they sent to the all so so, so all she is is somebody who supports the palestinian cause. in other words, you're saying, as far as you know, she's, she's never been there to fight for. she's not pro ha, she hasn't stated a position. what, what, what i guess what i'm getting out of here is what could they have reached to, to accuser of terrorism while she's living in england? a well big cleaning. the head posting on social media supports. there isn't because she supports the pl affinity of quotes and the policy and resistance at one point

and find if she's sent over. or if she had it in to that is really they would go into the u. k. government and you can government people asking her lunch as much like that that and basically when they went after richard with hers last week, the address of which was my 1st. i know that because it's a journalist, an activist, as well as exact on extra does anybody who was they would be interested in sort of case they built in charges and there isn't charges. that means that's 1.5. she didn't go for the, the genius for 3 years. so for saying that i am, i guess the also that's happening and goes, i don't know why i'm just final question on this cuz i'm thinking i've seen protests in the, in the, in the u. k. where thousands of people have been protesting for the ceasefire and for. busy for palestinians, and against the massacre that's being perpetrated by israel. why would they arrest her and not those of the thousands of people?

what is it about her that makes her so special? she is a very influential figure. it also shouldn't be there. she has quoted in many of followers of all that we read for. she doesn't have books and at the same time recency over the past week, she has been talking the issue of vaccines and the fact that is our dining. basically there's something, any possibility of having a few minutes or impose or to choose to allow for vaccinations to come in. and the i, mr to the children and guys all who are suffering from a wide strip of, for your body of type to which has basically stood by the as soon as intell got the point. so when she mentioned that over the past week, something that we have, i thought there is a police training at home, resting her and we didn't know where she was until later on in the day when we found out that she is being held at the police station and she managed to see her lawyer after about, you know, there's been books written about this. it said that i think it was in brave new world that we would get to a place in our society where we would have thought police people would arrest you

for what you think. and obviously we don't have the facts all in this case. so we should not conjecture, but man, it certainly sounds like this woman is being arrested for what she thinks and what she says and not for what she does. and that just doesn't seem, it just doesn't seem right. and i hope that the u. k. maybe they have a perfectly good explanation for this. well, we'll wait and see. meanwhile, back to the board charges. there is no, they just went up and head for what to expect on social media. so it is and it's wrong. so let's go back to what's going on this week. we've got a flurry of attacks. we've got flurry of condemnation. we've got a lot of action going back and forth again as you and i had discussed in the past. it was a quiet time. now, it seems like there's not a, not so quite a time between both lebanon has the law and the idea. can you characterize for us what's happening in that situation right now?

well, i was really said the doing the cost interviews the, the credit of the study ition or for the best and for the isn't yes of the nation of what else as well as some of those in better southern suburbs. so the, the issue came in earlier this week and it was massive because they must have been sort of as the entity 100 and thank you them with their sense of his really entity . they hit the military base because the most of his images of the b, that's a base for the sub and the list agent to a 100 unit that's responsible for espionage online, basically propaganda among other issues. so they measured that based on his witness on some of the haven't spoken about who was the targets, as well as says that if they are satisfied with the result, once they get the results because they do have and so all the drugs they would consider this find close, but if they are not satisfied with the kinds of people that they might have just at their to hit, then they're going to open another phase of the patient on a search face and fucked it up. the nation is one thing. support thing,

but it does have the wrong basically because the support front of the government, the c as in delta continue, it never stops. and yesterday, the day before the patient and the date has brother continued to escalate its attacks against the 15, using short range massages of cards. in the midst of today, we saw them talk multiple basically is more than the 5 uh is really uh, pools and the products as well as the long. a northern swans, which are embedded within thank you momentarily just from the blue line which is the withdrawal line of that is really uh, occupation forces from soft living on buckets above that. but they wanted it in 2000. so they hit the supplements for example. and then you go to miss of somebody asked me in a space where did they use garbage besides in that case, when they were targeting the supplements. and they didn't use that as much as they want to use schedule shows, i guess um the 2 products and i told them this video provision forces did refuge something rooms and civilian homes inside the supplements. so it's

a good thing has argued because it will actually uses guided, besides the best part is against the military and of this the videos. and that's why when i select the most with this piece of it. but the issue of, he said, we thought to give the administrative office of basis because we don't want to target the civilians, unlike or anything was surfacing our civilians. wow. so this comment from the basset or to the united states. we're down to a minute here, but can you, can you characterize that kind of statement where he's telling the people of love and on look if he seems to be setting, if you don't get rid of his bullet, we're going to go in there and get rid of his bowl and you read a vendor that needs to actually uh with mr. cover. the 2006 is really i guess in all the drones and soft level of the time for the starting. his paper, i can says in one thing this time, i mean they have the tanks burned out and level they, when we try and they us for that piece fired afterwards. mm hm. they were the ones

who were 17. 0 one they couldn't push as well away from the river they, they had bought a status update, so they directed by the blue line. i think this rate is right. so the idea that they did with every single point that they talked to, to me or talk to the people. so the government, they want to come in, just go ahead. i mean, what, what, we're going to moderate and big. you know, thanks to you for being there and being able to give us a perspective that is too often not heard, at least not in the western media. so thank you so much layla and good luck. we hope to talk to you again soon. i thank you, that's our shell. remember to always be looking outside your own box when it comes to choose because as you can find out when you watch this show this we think don't live in boxes. i'm rick sanchez and we'll be looking for you next time. the

new place to do that, even if the pd or 1st audio page go metal, don't use it for this is the 2nd position i see to shifting it because each time she could have been collected stupid to photocopy, slipped to describe the video and introduce i'd have to do is make sure that you

create excuse tardiness, which is pretty cool story. so if it's possible cleaning some doors and not say that the once it's done, it's conflicting the thoughts about the string of centuries ago. your for bears name, this country ukraine or frontier because you're steps blank, europe and asia, the ukrainians, that become frontiersman of another. so the, the president of the phenomena hold on. he says there was a senior. this one was which i liked. most of them there's always, you know, going to jump with most goals and would have been that much a lot of the headlights measure which is cool. man joe, point on your post pro case gift to 2nd the how kind of crazy stuff on the

the there was a time when i started to was abused to obtain flowers divided the continental langford amongst themselves. it was divided as a hunting ground. if we do not unite the corner knives as we come again, we know that they are those who want the mazda continent to step and 8, but the mazda clinton, and can never be stopped, because the mazda continent must be great. she will only be great. on the shore does all of us sons and daughters on by the sun all day. so now click on the goodwill console. and let us confess about underground

east to mazda upon the. the 5 civilians are killed in thousands. one did hit the ukrainian attack on residential buildings and the vehicle in the russian boarder, regence of belgrade, off the bombs were effected, has been used in the attack. and pushing forward. russia says it says that the crate in supply routes and the dumb boss has its fruits edge towards strategically important areas or a pro policy and peace activist is invested upon home by british police report to the over confidence she posted online. we discussed the issue with the british parliamentarian and broad broadcast that george galloway fraternity is not yet a fascist to country but is.