the, the the hey everybody, i'm rick sanchez and this is the week in review and this is a sort of what we're going to be talking about. will ensure america always has the strongest moseley for fighting force in the world. wow. does the united states military really need to be the most lethal? interesting word choice now i rick sanchez. hey, what do you say we do this? the right here we go. we are right in the thick of things right in the middle of the us selection sees and the conventions are finally over and now it's a dead heat to the finish. this is our weekend review and obviously we're going to be talking a lot about that. joining me now to do this,

i have to go through this weeks events, as dr. wilma leon is the co host of the critical hour on the video. sputnik great show by the way you should catch it and curious to talk about all this. so let's get started. first on the list, we all know that the united states and mexico are tied at the hips, always had been there's an amazing history, much of the united states about most of the united states used to be mexico. so politically, economically, demographically, it's, it's, it's, it's, it's definitely a long standing relationship. and we also know that the united states as tended to be the big brother and this relationship throughout the history of these 2 neighbor countries. but that might be change. boy, is it ever these days anyway, or at least in the last couple of days, i want to take a listen down to the president of mexico scolding the united states and its us and bassett, or to mexico. see really j. c.

well, the said i had a the focus of young lucas on my little face is on my left. will joe doing the hello so. so what he's basically saying is, what the hells united states and it's in bass, or to tell us what to do with our country when it comes to our own political process. and in this case, our uh, additional reform process. in short, here's what's going on. so mexico wants to change how it's federal judges are chosen. it wants them to be elected by the people, rather than selected by, you know, politicians and corporations. be us says, no, we don't like that. we think that will hurt democracy. and that is why president over door seems to be saying, mind your own damn business. that's what's going on right now. interesting. these 2 countries being and this viewed wilma, what's uh, what, say, a few. well, you know,

back when they had the, the summit up some of the americas a couple of years ago in los angeles, president biden was talking about democracy and sovereignty. we must protect democracy, we must protect sovereignty. and now here in mexico, a sovereign nation meeting sovereignty, meaning you are able to control the politics and economics within your own, define geographic space. and you can use for us to do so. now lots to go to a democratic process. the thing judges not pointing judges, and now the united states wants to cry. wow, well, there is another thing that over door is that a low is complaining about the united states using n g o as, as cover for the for machine change. and the same thing that the united states did a new grain, the same thing the united states is trying to do in,

in venezuela. the same thing united states is trying to do in haiti using n g, those like the national endowment for democracy. yeah. right. is that right? yeah, to, to fan the flames of unrest in the country. well, it's fascinating. i think got to me that, and i'm not sure why we're doing this. i mean, i'm, i'm not sure i'm smart enough to understand the legal and political ramifications of why we think it's better for the federal judges to be appointed rather than elected, especially given what's going on with our own supreme court right now, where we're finding out the billionaire is own a bunch of the guys who were, you know, appointed and, and, and not elected. maybe we should be looking at, at that situation as well as far as a m low, as you call them president over door complaining about the united states wanting to engage in. so you know what they are. i disagree with them. i mean, i disagree when we go to ukraine and tell those people what to do or rush hour or,

or, or iraq or any of these countries that are not maybe one percent of americans could even find on a map with mexico in the united states. we shouldn't have a relationship where we could tell them what we think and they should tell us what we fit, what they think as well. i think, what am i wrong? well, we should be able to tell them what we think, but we shouldn't be able to tell them what to do, correct. they are a sovereign nation. and the reason i believe that the united states wants to, uh, wants to try to control mexico's judicial process, is with the same reason that the supreme court that donald trump has installed is working in the interest of neal liberals in this country. the you who pays the pipe recalls the to the united states wants to be in control of the legislative process of mexico. i the traditional process in this case. yeah. no, i'm sorry. did you just yeah, no, yep. i got it. i got a different rose,

clear point, well taken. all right, so let's talk about this. since we're talking politics just this week, republican presidential candidate donald trump picked up another key political endorsement from a progressive democrat. former progressive democrats, hawaii congress, woman former hawaii comes from adults, a gabbert hated by the corporate media. by the way, there's to say about donald trump. we saw this through his 1st term in the presidency. when he not only didn't start any new wars, he took action to de escalate and prevent wars. he exercise the courage that we expect from our commander in chief and exhausting all measures of diplomacy. having the courage to meet with adversaries, dictators, allies and partners alike in the pursuit of peace. oh, here's my take on this and i'm interested to hear yours. i know you're no fan of donald trump, but i think he's less worse than what we have right now. on foreign policy,

but to hear her make him out to be mother teresa seems a bridge too far might take. what is yours? a bridge way, way, way too far. and i can't even see the bridge. it's so it's so far away the quad. i think what, what we're seeing demonstrated through tulsa gathered is her anger and disgust at the democratic party. yeah. and so she is the gentleman which is incredibly legitimate, but the path that she has taken i have to question. so for example, for her to say that donald trump started know wars doesn't mean he didn't try. he just wasn't society assassinated was the leader of the wrong iran. he may have, you know, sort of the, exactly, i know where you're going with the he, he is a,

was even in life, a patron, a patron site in a wrong and they don't even have the same, but you get, i get your point. oh yeah, result like the guy, he's there guy and we shouldn't be going around the world assassinating other people's leaders just shouldn't do it. i don't care. let me say right. i saw him. i saw him when i was in a row. he was standing for a 2nd. he was standing right in front of me and i got a, i got a sense of how revere they call him the ghost. and when i, i reached down to pick up my camera to take his picture and he was gone. yeah, he was fine. and by the way, trump was probably doing babies bidding when he did that. oh no question. yeah. so fortunately for ron was much more patient, then we would have been to have the tables been turned. so for her, but, but here's a, but here's the port. okay, but here's the point. here's, here's where, let's,

let's talk about what we're talking about. there are some geographical locations in the world where i think trump has a better position. then let's say a couple of harris and nap and joe buttons and ukraine. absolutely, for example, is, is, is one of those. uh, i tend to like his position when it comes to nato, for example, and not just kissing their butts and making them kids are, but it's all the time. so there are places where i like his positions better, but that doesn't mean it's across the board. better than anybody else out there that is that very good. any? yes, that is very fair, but his different positions doesn't necessarily mean there will be different policy. yeah. because the, the elite that are actually in control of the policy smart, the donald trump, can say what he wants to say, but he can't do what he wants to do point well taken point, well taken. and you articulated that well, better than the one before where you've got your words mixed up,

print page or saved or whatever. all right, let's play the opposite game now. ready. i love the opposite game because i do this with my granddaughter all the time. and i'm pretty good at it now. here's pamela harris, closing the democratic convention, while sounding on like tulsa gabbert remarkably hawkish, almost neil cottage. i would call this, you're going to love this. a cross between john bolton and john wayne, but it's pamela harris. douglas. as commander in chief, i will ensure a miracle always has the strongest moseley for fighting force in the world. wow. it's. it's like we're going to go around now we're going to do. we're going to win the bass the we're going to. it's like disable leveling. oh my god, i don't, oh man, it's like what happens the democratic party when you, when i read growing up, these guys are like piece mix. they used to smoke marijuana and sit around going, oh man, we gotta find ways to make people better and love and peace and what,

what we've come a long way there, wherever she's fighting ghosts in old war. what, we're sure what we're, what we're experiencing now is a total shift in the g o political landscape. yeah, we're moving from a, a, a unipolar. the u. s. is totally in control to a multi point of world. and that shift is not taking place based upon military fire power in jingoism. the shift is taking place based upon economics, has bricks and the, the, the, and, and other international economic like the chinese cooperative bank, whatever. i forget what that thing is called. yeah. that so they're moving away from the world bank and the i a map off of the dollar to briggs. and so

basically sees the latest ancient, antiquated position. then you think that the dams feel like they need to sound like this. so they can be the republicans cuz they're, there's a whole, they're kind of in the marketplace and that we just, we have to sound even if we're not, we need to sound tough or, or do you think they really buy it and they're going to do this i mean, i think if you look at the, by the, by years have been hawkish as hell. i mean, this guy did, well, there's not a place in the world he doesn't want to bomb. i mean, um, was he lived there? is that what he really is, is that what the democratic party stands for, and is that what harris is going to stand for? i don't know, do you? i mean, what, what is your best guess? i can't figure out where that's where joe biden has always been. yeah, obviously that's where that's where the democratic party is moving to. and joe biden told us that her positions are not going to deviate much from his positions.

she has not demonstrated anything to tell me anything differently. that's true. and what and what she just articulated is praise more of the same and it's a crazy day old strata. yeah, i mean, she just sounded, i've never seen, she's true. she sounded almost like it's like almost angry and hateful about the rest of the world. like we own you. we're going to tell you what to do. we're going to attack you. we got bigger guns were, i mean, i'm not sure damage change. i'm not sure i'm just, i'm just even if you are the biggest bad is guy on the playground. it's just not smart to go around telling everybody you are, you know, you and so i just said what if i could really quickly we don't have the hypersonic technology, the russian missile technology, the rest of it has in the china has. yeah, we are running out of ammunition,

we're running out of techs, we don't have the, the, the, the, the military fire power on the ground. we don't have it. it's not there. yeah, no, i've heard, you know, i've heard the same thing. some of people have spoken with in the military area kind of gone folks that, that we don't have what we say we do in that respect though, you know that stuff that's, that's a, that's a, that's another conversation for another day. i think cuz it requires a certain amount of expertise and who knows, they might be bluffing. all right, so sticking around, because when we come back, we're going to continue with some more comments about what's going on, especially with something else that was said about kelsey gabbert. by the media and r f k junior, which i want to get your take on it when, when they call the conspiracy theorists interesting use of words these days will be right back. stay right there, of the look forward to talking to you all that technology should work for people. a robot must

obey the orders given by human beings, accept with such orders at conflict with the 1st law. should we live in just in case we should be very careful that on the personal intelligence, the point obviously is to place a truck rather than to the area with artificial intelligence. we have somebody with him and the robot most protects his phone. existence was on the stuff for the

summer shift towards opportunities such as you the show color the vehicle. is it the economic model have us defined what it means different this time next time and see if it's doesn't take her to testify this thing. and so with the concept, even though is the new much so i was unable to deal with the company in some village, developing bio chemical weapons inside you crate. the solution you know wasn't cheap, but the white glove service cost. but do you think that sort of sandwiches the on the hey,

welcome back. so i'm rick sanchez and i mentioned chelsea gavin a little while ago. right. let's talk about r f k junior. so something happened this week which i thought was really fascinating when he finally said, you know what, i'm going to go to be on trump side. right. so yeah, i have the media training, this guy like he's a bank robber or something. i know he's an imperfect guy, a little controversial done some stuff so so, so, so by so have we all, so by the way, i think the way the media treated him has to do with why he's jumping on board. the trump try take a listen to what he had to say, and i think this is interesting and well stated. take a listen to what he has to say about what the democrats and the media did to him by snubbing him. and he contrasts it to how other independent candidates were treated in the past. like, for example, ross perot, the tnc allied mainstream media and ad works maintain a near perfect embargo on interviews with me and his 10 on presidential campaign in

1992 raj for ro gave a 34 interviews. i'm industry networks. in contrast, during the 16 modest inside declared abc, nbc, cbs m. s. nbc and cnn combined gave only 2 live interviews from a 20 to 2. i mean how he's right wilmer, i mean, and when they did talk about them, it was about some bear. he found and left in a park and they turned that into like a terrorist act of some kind. i'm lied about the fact that he killed the bear when he did and he found it somebody else with it, with the car. it just, it was a bit over the top. i think i well, there is no question and the number 22 to 2 shows you how the main stream now is controlling the narrative that cuz they're not only doing

this with candidates, such as a robert kennedy junior. you're doing this through social media by the platform. you people? yeah. they've done it to scott ritter by breaking into his house. they've done it with all molly? yes. should tell a and a who who was 3, who's trial starts? i think on the 5th of september, so they are, they are desperately trying to control the narrative. and these are examples of how they're going about doing it to. yeah, and you know what, there's one more thing on that. why does the media resort to name calling of people that they disagree with? and, and, and how is that? how is that good journalism, by the way, here, this, this is interesting. listen to this. so when tulsa gabbert joined, the trump train also, the 1st thing i did is i started monitoring the reports that were out there, right? and i, and i went through all the networks and i found the one on a, b,

c. where just casually, the reporters talking about these 2 individuals are not going to join the trump team and they refer to tulsa gabbert and kennedy as conspiracy theorist. and i'm thinking that's not just bad journalism. it's bias journalism. and it's lazy journalism, especially from the network that's supposed to be hosting this debate. take a listen. it comes this morning. it says campaign is highlighting the 2 former democrat, some joins the trump transition team r f k junior, coming over just days after he dropped out of the race and endorse trump. and also, the congresswoman tells me, gathered both our former progressive democrats, who have embrace trump and also means increasingly into conspiracy theories in recent years. and, you know, here's, here's my point about that. if she was doing a profile on tulsa gabbert, you know, if you, if i was doing a profile on you, i'd find stuff you've done that. you're probably not so proud of. as by the way, i'm much more in perfect than you are. so don't think i'm criticizing here or that

i know things think about you, but it wouldn't be fair then to say, well, when we talked about those a gabbert, there was this one incident that happened and i did the at but on the other side, but no she's just doing a 32nd quip on the fact that she's been named. and the only things you can think of is that she's a conspiracy theorist. seriously. that's lazy, that's lazy journalism. the 1st of all you and in perfect that you're just throwing them in stock. uh huh. but so 1st of all, people need to understand is i is, i know the history, the term conspiracy service was, was coined by the c i a, as a way of dismissing people that were questioning the kennedy assessment, the cat, the assassination of a former president kennedy yeah, that's a, that's a term coined by the c i a as far as i understand. huh. and what is that? what is the adage, i think is joseph heller, who said just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they're not chasing you. yeah.

so, so to do it is lazy journalism because once you drop someone, a, a conspiracy theorist that's, that's along the same lines and just as reckless as dumping someone. uh, add types of medic, that troll usually, yeah. used as a way to just summarily dismissed somebody. and it has, has robert kennedy junior taken some off center positions? yeah, sure. a jury has a but who hasn't well, but what about does a gabbert? i mean, i'm sorry, but i haven't seen any conspiratorial statement from her other than the fact that we should not be in the policeman of the world. we shouldn't be fighting. and all these wars, there are people outside the pedagogy where making a hell of a lot of money and getting rich. all these wars politicians are being paid to essentially the engages in these wars. those are basically the points of change made. none of those are conspiratorial,

and i would argue most of them are factual. but as soon as that, as soon as those positions start to gain traction, the dhamma to the dominant narrative then becomes less effective. and that is one of the major objectives of this. the knob refers of the lee called the new york times the washington post. yeah. other elements of mainstream media. it is interesting though, isn't it, that what's going on here? we watch the democratic campaign and the convention, pardon me and, and we're going ways further in the direction of bringing in the neo cons. like, uh, they had that one uh, congressman who came and spoke, who is a republican is his name escapes me right now. and it's interesting the demo, so just trump is going after democrats like tulsa gabbert and j f. k junior. and the democrats are going after republicans just so they can put them on stage to

talk bad about trump. what's this is, this is, this is fascinating how they're exchanging the tools here. if you look at the, if you look at political labor labeling, out of 10 things, right? okay, okay, right, right. but you will find, you know, you can go back and look at the terms conservative and liberal, and you can go all the way back to the, to the french revolution. and then you can see how many of these terms take on different meanings over time. hence the term neil level. yeah. um yeah. so the, so we are seeing that i think also with a, i want i want to call it development because that gives it some kind of positive consultation. but as we do, the stereotype to we have assigned to these parties are not changing. let me talk about something that's almost tragic comic right now. you're ready to boeing. starlight or capsule has left to astronaut stranded on the international space station. we've been talking about this this week, this has nots. i mean,

these guys were supposed to be there, like for a days now, were told they might be able to get them down in february. and it's not gonna be boeing that gets them down because boeing's capsule and rockets don't work. they're leaking helium, and the thrusters aren't the thrust thing and i don't know anything about trust stairs or thrusting, but take a listen to how they were talking about this on the young turks as one of our members archive pointed up, sorry line or is it safe is a 737 max. right? it's a wait. exactly. that's why i do not in any way but grudge nassau for making this decision. it is awful that these 2 asked or not they're going to be stuck for many months in the international space station. they won't be able to come home until february. i gotta tell you, man, this is a movie. i mean, stranded in space. and, and the villain is the same guy. it's almost like, you know, doctor know, or it mean it. and boeing strikes again. what's up with boeing?

well, you know that the, the, the federal government, nasa decided that they wanted to try to privatize space flight. so they found boeing. they found the law must skin and space x. yeah. um to, to, to, to privatize this. one of the things that is, is ronnie gord, crazy to me, is how they're trying to control the narrative because one of the story 1st broke, they said, well yeah, we can't bring them back when we plan to, but they're not stuck. if you can't bring them back when you want to, to them, what are that they're stuck in? the other thing is russia has a spit, it has a space program. china have based program, but oh, we can't reach out to them for help because we have bill find them. they have now become our enemies. and so we can't cooperate with them because i, yeah. and or russia could send up a rescue rescue cruise. but again,

those are enemies now. we can't turn them for help. i don't know where i'm or can't we all just get along. we're trying. we're meeting incredible resistance. thank you so much, my friend. it's always such a pleasure to have this conversation with you. it feels like just 2 guys having a cup of coffee or maybe even the dump beverage. that's our show. vertical waves look outside your old bugs, drives it 11 boxes. i'm rick sanchez and we'll be looking for you next time. the there was a time when i started to was abused. due pain flowers divided the continental life for tom mox themselves. it was divided as a hunting ground. if we do not to night, the corner knives as we come again,

we know that they are those who want the mazda continent to step and 8, but the mazda clinton, and never be stopped, because the mazda continent must be great. she will only be great. on the shoulders of our sons and daughters on by the set of the, comes a good time for us. let us confess about underground east, the mazda, upon the, the release of russian states. never as i've started as soon as the most sense community best most all sense and up in the system must be the one else calls question about this,

even though we will then in the european union, the kremlin machine, the state on the russians putting s r t suppose next, even our video agency roughly all the band on youtube tv services for what question did you say even closer to the the

reason make on the exam.