of, i'm disrupt through this information that includes the use of the bikes, military information support operations provided, next generation capability to collect disparate data through public and open source information streams, such as social media, local media, etc. to enable me so to craft and direct influence operations and messages and relevant peer near peer environments, provide a next generation of deep fake or appear your peer environments. so wally us is wagging it, spin good, well show and making unsubstantiated to allegations about this information. it's i think the happy to is know the fact that it's military is heavily engaged in doing just fine. but of course when the us does it, it must be okay. right? that's at least we want you to believe as well as of this is oh, it's good to have the company with us here on our see international direct impact

files up next we'll be back. have a couple of them. the if you think about russia, what is your mind picture the landscapes open up before your eyes? the last one does. can you imagine the, the discounts dodge the journey the,

are you ready to come along the the hey, rick sanchez here. this is direct impact on this in the summer, but we're going to be talking about people inside you crime and in questions about whether this was a good deal. and that was at that point, that it, that it fell apart. this is a blockbuster admission that you are about to hear,

that is victoria new and none other than victoria newland admitting for the very 1st time that she and others in the us government killed the peace deal between russia and ukraine. and she goes on to explain why they did it. i'm rick sanchez. what do you say we do this? the book, one way or another one way or another truth? oh, my dad told me this. my mom told me this. i tell my kids is one way or another. it could take a decade. it took me months years, but the truth always comes out. it just does. and here it is, victoria newland telling the truth. she has just made a block buster concession. nolan was the under secretary of state in charge of all

things ukraine, and that part of europe. she's earned a reputation as among the most part of the most pre, your hawkish, neil cons in the entire u. s. government. right. and she is now in eons ago. she and others killed a piece deal that would have ended the war and ukraine would have ended the war and ukraine. i mean, i mean, wow, right, i'm still thinking about this myself and, and, and i'm impressed with its import. we have reported here on several occasions about the facts that we knew that russia and the crating diplomats had reached a deal. but then former u. k. minister boris johnson showed up and told the ukrainians, nope. turn it down. say no, we don't want it. yeah. tell the russians, of course, johnson and other western denied that they did that. but now victoria,

no one is actually i'm surprised, she's doing much truth. she even explained what the ukrainians began outside the walls of the hotel and p, what she was saying. and i can tell that she's a political monster except herself and accept the the say she works for that is a problem. she's not a diplomat. i, she just goes for total destruction. and she does for you, right? the shortened, pretty good, 14 actually distorted craig, and 2022, an individual of that not have given you the most, the courts on track and getting the framework the online because there were, she was also the i in crane connection. you're not knowledge in the law, most the courts which you print it. sorry. so this is her roland. this. she's wasn't, she's responsible for the deaths of more than 970000 ukrainian soldiers up to just to say she was responsible for all those that actually costs for the warrant. don't box and 40. i mean, cuz here's what hold on. let's just stay with this issue. can you think of maybe i

misunderstand this? maybe i'm not giving or enough credit. maybe she's right. maybe i'm not looking at it correctly. i'm more. i'm always thinking of, there's a way to stop a war. you stop a war. but her explanation to him, i found interesting because she's being very picture you, she's talking about, well there was this thing in the deal where when we read paragraph 5 of the ukraine wouldn't be allowed to have so many weapons. but the russians could mean that sounds which to me am i wrong and why give me, am i the am i not national this? yes, it is because an excel and 14 crane had its are, it was a total disaster. i knew, but he was a no problem with that at all. and the us was responsible for basically been typing up the printing army with the old weapons from another $10.00 for called spectrum, sending them out to bring, bringing them what you want them to us, the backyard. so that's what she was doing. she's also looking at her and said,

well, she's the part of the cranford. have a smaller arm. when you pray, do you deal with the lot if the war ends? i mean, yeah, my god, the ukraine might have a smaller army than russia. we can't allow that to happen, so let's least let these people continue to kill each other. that sounds quite her at her word. it sounds like she's saying we just want to continue more arms sales. that's what i'm hearing. this is. that's what it is. and that's what it's all about today, because over the top of the contract with the government of russia. so those are what to do with it, just making money on the books investor property that we printed on that site. that's what it's all about. that's what the score is all about. that's what she's all about. this is she choose the representative of the dc finding the what was actually h, russia from her body universe then? yeah, i used to serve on the russian both in the ninety's and from that day on she just hates right from the i don't know what happened on the boat,

but somebody else she just from her. she doesn't that. yeah. for a different that and that's a government official, that's a total disaster. the that's a turbo that's used to policy because the policy led to the war happening. the printer. there were sort of sparks of war between russia and magic paint. but we can actually have the united states, jesus looks all about she she's, she's not. and then i mean, i'm not, you know, bless, feeling her being overly critical. what i say, what everybody knows was studies us politics. she is a neil con. she is a war hawk. she comes from that background. she's made her money in that background, and her husband is just as bad, if not worse than she is. and his name is robert kagan, and by the way, he has every right to be that way. so people can be warhawks and people can be peace next either way. but it would be fair to classify both of them as that. i've got another story i want to bring to you. then i want to probably talk about it on the backend as we go to the break. because speaking of the military industrial

complex, which you and i've been talking about, what do you say we talk a little bit about the iraq war? why nobody in the united states ever talks about the rock or like a never even happened though it did. and because when we think of the iraq war, there's one name, one name that comes to mind, it's not victoria newland, although it couldn't be. and it could also be your husband, robert kagan, but the real big name when he talked about the rock mores cheney, cheney cheney and cheney, he is the absolute embodiment of that. more is also in body meant of what president eisenhower warranty gets. right? letting people who make their money from war into our government eisenhower said, don't do that america. well, when it comes to that, it doesn't get any betters. and dick cheney, even after, as an unnecessary war in iraq and his company made billions of dollars off of it. it is easily one of the worst military blunders in us history. yet this weekend, he and his daughter endorsed vice president, come along, hair is good for them. they have

a right to. it was celebrated by democrats and by the media. as of jesus, christ himself had come down to earth and endorse ms. harris. jenny will be voting for com on harris that, that's liz cheney confirming that both trainees will be voting for comma la harris . and that on cnn. the talking heads. they come on to talk about this. they talk about this guy like he's one of the greatest men in the history of my dog. listen, i'm not surprised list training. someone who will put her career on the line to do it was right. she has been a vocal critic of the former president since january 6th, and she's endorsed democrats before cheney and comma harris effectively on the same side as a better understanding of the rest american democracy. national security. we have trumps own former chief of staff, former defense secretary, former generals,

all talking about how he is a risk to national security. and now to have dick cheney come and remind us of that is ethics very compelling. can you believe this? i mean a, we living an upside down world or something like, i'm not criticizing them for saying this is important for harris and the democrats to get a prominent republican to be on their side is the right that, that is true whenever either party does that just like it was when robert kennedy until together did the same thing for trump. but where's the context pan? i mean, did they forget the iraq war even happened, or they may be too young to remember? i mean, do they not know that was a civil war? 2, and then to call him the cheney, the guy who makes us safer. really, there was or created, possibly more terrorism organizations than any other battle in the history of the united states on earth. completely screwed up whatsoever, whatever chance for democracy that will ever be in the middle east. i made a safe law. and i mean, you know, i, i just,

i listen to these people. sometimes i feel sorry for americans who end up getting their news from cnn. i really do, i mean are these people who i'm hearing talking here about these things with cheney? are they, are they bought off? are they just stupid? let's talk about this after the break. when we come back. i mean, this one gets really my, my blood boiling because okay, i don't mind doing the story, but put it in context. the way they presented. this almost seems to me out land ish . andre is going to join us on the other side of the brakes. there right, there will be right back, the, the, the, the state of the continental o send we in draft with the rest of the world. we're going to relate to the wind

in terms of donations on, in terms of tray assets, a month to define what she wants. political assets must define us soft costs. africa must define ourselves critically. the cause of your guys, no choice, but to move forward. forward. she will which will you know that he's getting with infinity of some of the most single slides. uh but the task of things to do you good to you? good to you to look to see the postal duddy, a little quick look at a few more than enough storage. air conditioning. so total on the

15. yeah. well the other stuff and i do see there with these reasoning, they don't really mean. yeah, well those are just like to talk to the the the under del jenko is an x, or he's one of those guys who tends to be a truth teller. that doesn't mean everything he says is right, but tends to be on the right path. at least it tends to be transparent and honest about it, or at least we try as best we can. you know, this thing with cheney really floored me over the weekend. i watched the coverage

of this and i was just flabbergasted by the hero we're shipping. and the fact that most americans and i feel bad for my fellow americans who are constantly being buffalo and by the media, by the fact that they never mention a rock. they never tell us what happened in iraq, and then they have a one and 15 record and the nfl inviting them on as a great coach coach, but integrate coach andre to the force of the grocer. all the things that we see how all of these are people from the beach they are showing their faces and, and how they're be trained by the media, which they don't, they don't, they, they find the public suit today. but unfortunately, the same time it's for guy that was why would it be to kind of see what's true and what's not true? we're forgetting what it stated about iraq, afghanistan of the for giving them the, remember, and about the rush of hope story,

which was destroyed by everybody who destroyed by all the experts. and then remember that. so that's what we're facing. the west, the surface, they can imagine what they're doing. you know, this is america. what they're doing to us, the print of treating us and around the world. so this is what we would have to do . what do you think it weighs? well, what do you, what do you mean? you're a ukrainian diplomat and i, i have been reading a lot lately about the pressure that ukraine got its politicians, it's government from the united states and from the brits, etc, etc. well, we just talked about it, they made you walk away from what would have been a peace deal that would have saved hundreds of thousands of ukrainian soldiers dying and russian soldiers. by the way, tell us about that pressure. what do you mean by that? they ain't sophie o ukrainian government officials. i was, i didn't want to part of that. so i said, no, they offered me even a citizenship. i said no, i'm not, right. so it's gonna be free. i have my own password and that's that i've been

applied for that function and that's what they were just about the what is that what they hold is that what they hold over the head like, okay, let's suppose the united states of america wants something out of country x, they go to country x. the 1st thing they do is they get to know the politicians and they come to the politicians and they say, hey, let's have a meeting, they have a meeting with them and then do they actually give them? i mean, i'm asking is a cache, you say it's american citizenship wise, american citizenship so valuable to these guys. a slasher relationship that started it does happen that they happened a couple of years for their people working on that route. that's a, that's a whole process. and they come up for see which politicians are more of a warrant, which is a western side, which politicians are more stupid, sorry for my language, and can be more controllable. last less questions, you're going to be given orders, direct orders to the store on century. i really go on, breaks them, depends on which politician has more money is the business times they offer him. the financial protection of portion was the last,

the other politicians flowed less money. they offered them citizenship, which a lot of the premiums were also on the publishers for ready. so all it's for, for that. so there's a trajectory rod, because of all that space, soviet era, cold war and i read again to that so we can get as low as the west lisco somehow they can travel back and forth there people of america, but they're not used to sleep nor to always as a 3rd world country and then we use always buy the so called the cheese and jewels . yeah. so i get it and, and i understand what you're saying and it makes sense to do that because they don't want me in order. they come to you and they said, we will destroy you. that's what is it to me, they told me that they will go after me. 2 members of the us embassy, which one of the members sitting here. i will function with the allies, but the all they told me if you will not take the view with us and he will still continue to go against us. we will politically destroy you. that's what they did. but what started, so from 1070, they went after me,

i've been searching my wife's lots in my country. but because i did the player because you didn't play their game because you didn't play the people, they called me russian energy. so let me ask you about that. you mentioned the united states goes in and they try to influence the politicians. they want to get them to pick up the phone and do their bidding, etc. doesn't russia do the same thing? didn't rush out, for example, probably going to ukraine and also try to influence some of these politicians, what a china and any other country do. something like this. the hazard or the pressure them or to act as radically as does the us that the back as well as the rest of the russian was there. so because i'm not forbids on projects and money making money on the side, but then the back, the rest of the spring to destroy your wives. you do not work. was that that is the biggest difference between russia and china or any other country. you are working with is of course, if you sell your soul, then you're going to be destroyed. if you're going to be the worst,

but your premiums were right? yeah. the premium is, was like, you know, what the hell here. right. so they did, they did a us official or someone working on behalf of the state department actually say to you, we need to get rid of for a jenco and even says he likes or he likes the way. she smiles, he likes, he likes her life, as i guarantee one thing that will never be played or seen by news consumers who get their information here in western media and places like cnn, etc, right? they're never gonna see that they'll see it here, but they won't see it there. he criticized. miss harris. how do you announce that he was going to be both voting for trump enough for her? or, or said something good about trump? i guarantee you it would have been on a constant loop all day long running on nbc. bbc see and then um, how am i wrong? tell me andre. this is a troll. this will be the trolling of what like

a 100 level. sounds good to find us politics because this topic a russian conclusion from happening for years and years and this will just be everybody's talking about those of you said what was pro it would be discount. oh yeah. positive interest topics. intelligence the inside. right. he didn't say what they want to do here, if, if he would have said no, i hate calmly. harris would have been huge front page new york times, but he said i want to her. she loves furniture. she's got a nice smile. i like i, she's live, she is agreeable. they're like, oh no, the trump to say that, that, that humanizes. and we can't let, that's gotta be human. right? i mean, that's what i'm thinking. it was so sorry to have so much sarcasm. it was politics which you don't understand, the more the big lead is on our side of how it works. that's bad, but it's going to go into history. how do you have to work with to us? and how do you have to put everybody in place and work on your own level, but i want to take him at his word. i mean, this guy is this guy's

a milk of alien. do like all politicians are, by the way, and i'm sure he says, you know what, i looked at her. she is good looking. she's got a nice smile. just got a nice demeanor. why not say that? i do, it's the figured always has the fractional, which is obviously greater rush it also you understand that sarcasm on the highest level of you can imagine ok politics. so basically this the you trump is these are tack being connected to russia. why that having to model as well. so we're going to vote for biologics. that's well for tomorrow we're, we're supporters of virus, or we're going to drone, right? that's the, that's what's on the, the marker issues based damage. and so did you ask them to do a survey about that? that's what i started translating for possible positive and getting less that bill that i think that's also because the yes actually is more on not professional integrity or the trump is. i think an international racial if you put together just

didn't lose. yeah, that's it. yeah. so by the way, we what we want, we, we apologize to our viewers are because your, your, your audio was a little bit hollow, but what was that hollow was what you had to say. i will send you some new airpods out there. so we can have these conversations in the future. okay. andre, it's a delight to talk to you enjoy this very refreshing real conversation and uh and the what is part of the.