it's me, i'm so fighting at the moment of creation of our universe, the deal it's exclusive, possible to make as smooth 5 mesa points, with honest official gravity that you can swim it a lot on their panoramic windows with transparent walls so that you could admire the vastness of the universe in our planet earth, which is very beautiful. yeah, we'd be july. i would see the space station a spacious, and the rights were clear, the more cation of utilities storage and the new york area, the fluid use in spring, radishes, and some of the blue restore reason, draw springs, golf course. cool, where you potatoes and if not, apples, then you can plan, perchance for example, hours, russian beautiful white birches, which wouldn't go well with the red landscape and give delicious virtues. outsourcing couples potatoes, cabbage harris, the law, radishes, audience,

carly deals, and that of apples, oranges, nuts, sounds, flowers, watermelon strawberries, haprett law, and buckwheat, and pumpkin to the we need to prepare to get to know to become friends, learn new things, teach them about things we know looks over to us thing. okay, well there are still certain fears, but the curiosity is greater and i want to get acquainted with our brothers of the universe as well. so i just need to contact, you need to establish contact with them to determine the degree of danger without rushing name was they called the 3 loop with the which coming, skeet, shooting, sailing, yachting in space. clear black, rolling and squash are the most feasible. the image, the seeds, bad ice cream chocolate,

keep them logging in some magnets or souvenirs from space c as a frequency over fresh fruits, vegetables, and may be pizza, especially brewed coffee. you'll be able to explain to them almost 2 weeks, i believe, and all sufficient intelligence because it is created by people based on time sensitive is just an area that i've worked in before. space exploration and i know that it can be programmed to be really helpful. and help reduce a loss of administrative work. more than little forward the i would still put human intelligence 1st, because it's better for robots to of a us. then for us to have a robots. typically one that can control itself will feed my answer today is if it is controlled by the human mind, then yes, around. so this is either way is good to have a company with us here on odyssey, international bar. in fact with rick sanchez and our menu only find the

. ringback the sanchez here is a direct impact and this is some of what we're going to be talking about. you know, a lot of trouble in the middle east and the around around the words you had tried to. so it just called a mom used to live in texas and you know, didn't to the computer chrome is you didn't keep your problem who's in talking to, well, that's a high ranking chinese diplomat. interested guy. huh. and he's lecturing right to his face, warmer vice president. dick cheney. this is quite a moment. you got to see it. i'm going to show it to you. i'm rick sanchez, a suicide. the the so i do want to start today with

a conversation about war and peace, something we talked about a lot on this particular show. you know, it's funny, it's a simple thing, but it all comes down to the average guy or gal on the street right. if you ask the average person, somebody's mothers, somebody's dad, how they feel about war, most will say, the want it stop it. right? but unfortunately, when it comes to war, it's not about what people want. never has been. right. i say that is because just today in the 2 largest conflicts that are taking place right now, anywhere in the world, there are 2 poles, 2 poles that are telling us what the average person wants and this think it. here's the 1st one you're ready. look at this one, it's conducted by the mirror by the times of israel, the times of israel. obviously a drizzle, and there's paper. it finds at 60 percent of israelis want a ceasefire. 60 percent of the people in that countries,

they stop this. they want the war and they want the hostages returned as already agreed to by both a moss and the international community. the that's not what the hawks there want. it's not what the is really wor, cabinet has interest in and that's why they have obstructed this piece. deal according to her rights, by the way, another newspaper in israel. it seems they need for the war to continue. so they can stay in power because the poll also finds that the majority of his re lease in this poll say they don't trust the prime minister. they don't trust prime minister netanyahu. there it is. look it up for yourself. okay, so when it comes to war, gaza, it is rarely citizens want a settlement and they want a negotiation of some kind. right. and you blame them. oh, what about the warranty crane? i'm glad you asked. look at this headline. this is the wall street journal, right?

is this, this one just came out. according to this, the journal is now reporting on some new polling out of ukraine, where they are citizens, again, the average joe, or the average mary out there. how they feel about the war and what they're saying is they want it. and now they want a negotiated truth with russia, even if it means giving up the territory. this is the average ukrainian speaking. the article also includes and indicates that the number of ukrainians against the war has increased each month ever since the failed counter offensive, especially at it right now, does it matter what one poll finds or what another pole finds? sure it does, but not as much as this. the fact that the journal, which is a conservative and neil con newspaper would write this article is perhaps even more significant, i think then the ball itself. yeah. well,

because it goes against what many of their face pay readers. the neo cons want. as we reported here yesterday, it's mail guns like former under secretary of state, victoria. no. and what there's war and ukraine to continue. she admitted it says that it, i mean here she is, as we bladed on our show yesterday, coughing to the fact that she stopped the ukrainians from signing a piece deal with russia that would have ended. there's more about a year and a half ago the ukrainians began asking for advice on where this thing was going and it became clear to us, clear to the brits, clear to others that prudence main condition was buried. and an amex, a to this document that they were working on. here's what i think about this wall

street journal article. the fact that it is publishing the story suggests. there may be a slight shift in us public policy and maybe even public perception. i would argue that a year ago this story would never have been published. you wouldn't not have seen it. i can almost guarantee you that because the western media, as we've been watching, that has been dog. i mean dog and image desire to only report report pro ukrainian stories obvious. that's what they've done. even going to the point of saying they're winning the war even when they're not winning the war. but now we're starting to see some examples of more. i don't know, i maybe the word is honest reporting good pasta. drug deal is in for manila. i guess. i guess what i asked myself is, or do you think they're reporting is different because it reality is setting into them or are they getting or sending signals to somebody that may be

there is some kind of policy shift. why is that? why are we seeing this? well, i definitely think it's getting in by the way, rick, i heard that victoria new and brought cookies to this interview to as well. it's book a, i think the foreign policy apparatus is looking for an offer in the, you know, they've let this money laundering scheme go far too long. and the people are starting, you know, they're starting to get a hip to what's going on. so i think they're trying to find a way, get an off ramp and move on to the next for an intervention in which they can mess with the jo taxpayer dollars they were you. um, i was taking it back by this by the wall street journal report. i didn't think the journal would be reporting something like this. because when you read the article, it's not like they really have the goods. it's not a very specific poll. it just says look, we've been monitoring this and with each passing month, fewer and fewer ukrainians are in favor of this war. more and more ukrainians are saying stop this crap now. so i was surprised that the journal wrote the story were, you know, i don't think so. i think they have to try to act like there's some legitimacy to

what's going on. i think we all remember the iraq war. yeah. with the new york times when the delivery paper was talking about ready to go with there and take care of saddam hussein. i know how to do it in a week. yeah. and they did it quite quickly. right. so i think this is kind of like this, this, this reasoning absorbs when it comes to the people in, in the mainstream media news. knowing that they have to have some form of legitimacy and understanding that the people don't want this warning more. so they got a problem a little bit on it by almost all right, but i almost feel like victoria newly just under kind of 2 people over there at the state department who knows or been some other office somewhere in our government who watched that interview. she did where she gave away the goods and they just said, what the hell is she doing? and you know, i would think that, but i mean this woman, you know, she's been caught with a phone call. she's been in and out of different administrations, and we remember who she's married to mr. kagan like, you know, this is their language, rick? not our 1st bad, rody. oh, good side of it may sound, many of them. people who work for us in this country, and this is this stuff,

the craig and i were just talking about it. we talked about this all the time. either elected or appointed are incentivized by the system to encourage wars that most of us don't want. i mean, i don't want that for my kids. i don't want that for my grand daughter. and, but for those people who are extremely powerful and, and they often have interlocking interests where they serve more than one master. you understand what i'm saying? and there's no better example of that, then the training, right? i mean, he's literally a leading figure in the military industrial complex president of a company that made billions of wars who went on that to become the vice president of the united states. and then sold us the american people auto war. wow. what a surprise mostly through lies. by the way, i mean this guy is the neo cons neil con. right. and that is why i find this next clip that i'm gonna share with you so fascinating and with, and with you to, you're going to like this guy, cuz this is really interesting. here's a, a chinese leader. it's like a little old man. he seems, you know, just

a diminutive guy, right. and he's lecturing the former vice president the united states. and he tells him essentially this. he says, you are now doing to others what the british once did to you. you have learned nothing from your lessons, mr. vice president essentially says that you were nothing from your experience watch when you became a member, when you come to me the yeah, number one needed to the power. you became a students and then also your to fall. well, boss, the british you want to for the others, is nigel. hundreds of you joined the other west and impurities for the lord. when you read the china in the 1950s america was a lead to your rates, the correct and use of that. and you'll meet

a lot of trouble in the middle east and the around around the words you tried to. so it just costs a month to live in texas. and you're dealing with computer chrome. this i'll do is a ton of munitions. i was quite happy to thank you for me for you to do me the chance. remember, so remember the and, and i hope i was hoping we could keep that cut away there at the end because the camera shifts to mr. tracy's face. and he's like, you know, he's got that cheney look where, but i, you know, i find this fascinating because i think we're going to see more and more of this. where some of these folks in the united states are being discovered and look, i'm not saying they're bad people. i'm just saying that the policies that they're enacting for a long time been the kinds of policies that hurt other countries. and for the most

part, we never heard that story. we're starting to hear it more now. right? absolutely. you know, is the truth about it is rick, is that america has become what it used to hate? i mean, that's not so much the people the ruling class. the problem is the ruling class isn't scared of the people. so until the people scare the ruling class, i'm going to see a lot more of this. we're going to see a lot more of this bullying attitude. that's a fascinating thing that you just said. how does the, how, how do we, the people scare the ruling class or we do that well, pitch forks for one, but i think uh, the last time i remember the ruling class was scared. i think it was during the iraq war when it just started off right before it became bushes war. there were so many people in the street. i think that was the 1st right. but, but you know what happens if people went on the streets tomorrow? and so i didn't know for this thing with guys in the this thing with ukraine, and that's why i'm sending 200000000000 dollars over there. let's keep that money here and take care of ourselves. if somebody says that, here's the problem. if a $100000.00 people went on the streets and said that cnn wouldn't cover. yeah,

they give it 15 seconds. so we got sick talk. we got instagram, we got facebook, we got social media, now we have this weapon. and yes, that will be sensor too. yeah, but we gotta get out there. we gotta stay out there. you being in the case of dick cheney that his announcement that he's going to go with carmel harris. i got to ask you this because speaking of dick cheney and we're about to talk in the next segment about a debate that there was so much bravado on the part of the dams brag and about the fact that they had the, the cheney endorsement of daughter and father, this is that this is the wrong to play it that way, that the average young person looked at as if that's a joke. they've completely lost the plot. i think they're waiting on an endorsement from satan next. i mean what, what are they thinking? listen, i, i can't make sense that this will be here. yeah, whatsoever, but this is not an endorsement you want as a democrat, as a left this as a level. so it just blows my mind that they even made that announcement. yeah, one of the, one of the pod cast that i listen to

a lot when i'm driving my car and obviously we live in this world. so we're constantly in this stuff. and the host on that show said that it's like she got an invoice endorsement from a war criminal. and, and i've heard that repeated more and more often. so i'm not sure that's gonna play for them. i think it might work against them in many ways, or at least they should have laid it out a little bit differently. all right, let's do this. when we come back, craig is gonna stick, stick around, we're going to be right here, right? you're not gonna go anywhere, i'll say, right, yeah, but she deals going to join us as well for a block for the block. it's talking about new polling that just come in. that for the 1st time is not good news for vice president harris. oh, and there's this debate tonight, did you hear that? we're talking about that to get right back. stay right there. the

hey, welcome back. i'm rick sanchez. you're ready. i'm gonna show you a 3 shot ready? boom. there is the same as 3 bucks. and in that box you will see greg post do like a host of the combo couch. and steve, go, who's an attorney and a conservative political commentator. i understand you guys know each other. right? very well. i know, but yeah, the very well we do. i do, we show often. so that should make for

a better conversation. so here's what's going on. gentleman lead has dwindled for couple of harris, you know, and this thing has been so episodic, the latest adventure of, as the campaign turns, had come to a hair is way up. because well, she did well during the democratic convention and because she was anointed into this position and because a lot of people really did not like bite. and so she became an alternative. and that really worked for a favor. she was a by as many as 6 or 7 points in a new york times portable in new york times poll now has her up, i know, sorry, has trumped up by one point. she's losing, for the 1st time she is losing the best res, which makes it really interesting. first of all, i was the, let me bring in, uh, your uh, experience on this uh your reaction to the fact that she's now losing the race and to what do you attribute it? yeah, she's a little bit like hillary clinton and the more people saw hillary clinton, the worst hillary did, the more people get to know tom,

a lot with the cat goals and the word salads. and we did name policies the last day lighter. and the new york times theater paul is particularly illustrative and that this same pole at this same time at joe biden, leading by about 10 points as hillary clinton, leading by adopting points. the fact that she's not reading in this poll, which over. busy democrats, which is still registered voters instead of likely voters meeting it's tilted towards democrats. i think is disastrous for harrison, i think puts the pressure on or in the debate because she has to perform. she did not perform well in the interview. and by the way, i don't think the media's that interested in this debate, they don't have the timeline scrolling at the bottom, how many hours and minutes and seconds until the debate. i think they're trying to not have people watch it because they don't want to see or have another flaming disaster. by the way, just to correct you on one thing. this particular poll that just came out with a new york times, they over pulled republicans, not democrats, which is why some people are saying that it looks like this is winning. but again,

it's one poll, and i always tell viewers. don't get too excited about one poll because take another one in a 24 hours and, and it, and it could change up. craig, do you, do you think that she has lost her last or somewhat as the times is reporting and to what do you attribute it to? well, i have to agree it completely with steve. the more she talks to more people dislike or, but i also think the fact that the opposite didn't show up to the convention go to really or who knows, the more the more that she gets out there, the more the people going to realize that she doesn't have a plan, she seems to be copying all of donald trump on everything a no tax on tips. let's go with that. that sounds good. yeah. she has no policies up on our website for crying out loud longer. this goes, the more she's going to get an old to be for none of them to this is the least policy centric. uh, campaign i have ever seen. a trump gets up there, stumbled mumbles, about whatever. who the hell knows what he's even talking about. she gets up there and basically just says good isms,

because essentially she doesn't want to get specific about any policies. and in the end i, i just think we all lose out as americans. here's where we are right now. i'm gonna show you exactly what the latest battle ground states look like. put up that map if you could, victor. and we're all going to look at this thing together. now you can see right there, all the states in read, those belong to truck. drop will window states, everything in blue that belongs to harris harris will window states. so then what we have left is florida and georgia there at the bottom. just above that you see north carolina and then you'll see pennsylvania. and then you see wisconsin in michigan, right. and that all the way out west, you see nevada and you see arizona, those are the states that are not yet to be determined. now some of those you can probably give to some people, but the ones a when the states, that's the person who's going to be the next part of united states. and if you really want to focus it on one state, look at pennsylvania. this election will most likely be determined by who wins the state of pennsylvania. so tonight, thanks victor. tonight,

when these 2 candidates get together and they debates, it really is going to be about who can convince people of pennsylvania to vote for them. what would you do if you were the strategist for either one of these? uh, mr. gil, your 1st of all, as it gets prompt to keep his comments, you know, under control the discipline which is going to be a challenge to him. but no matter what the questionnaire is, talk about inflation, the economy and illegal immigration, i think is he can stay on those and, and kind of avoid some of the via text. i think he does very well. i think if she can be like football, seemed to be coherent, seemed to be smart, all of which might be impossible for me. she may be able to do all right. if this is all about attacking trump, i don't think she'll look presidential. i don't think she'll convince people and, and the thing i would point out about pennsylvania is you have pittsburgh and philadelphia that are both blue pittsburgh more because of unions. and i'm not sure

that the democrats are going to do as well there as usual. but in between, you essentially have alabama, it's read in between. so pennsylvania advise you comes out to turn now, what do you think, craig about the fact that they're not allowed to interrupt each other? they're going to mute their microphone. so when one is talking, the other one is not allowed to talk or they can talk, but no one's going to hear them. um and, and also the fact that steve just made a really interesting point, it would be not smart for her to do. but hillary did in the past and just attack him because there's nothing she can say about him. i think that most americans don't already know what i'll do. she wants to necessarily attack them. i think she wants to set him off. we saw his rally in wisconsin, and he called kamala conrad time and time again. i mean, to me, he's blowing this right now, but what it comes also to the election, i want to point out that you have it right on the nose when it comes to pennsylvania. but i think this selection is more about how you can vote not just who can vote. so the areas that have mass mailing ballots, absentee ballots, invalid harvesting. they're going to stay with the democrats at nevada,

is going to go to kamala, but i think you can take george off the table for her. and that's going to go to president trump. so i think you hit it on the nose. and from what i hear rick in pennsylvania, it's all about the latino vote. they're going after the latino vote. that's where kamala harris is vulnerable. and that's what donald trump is trying to pick ups a boat. so keep an eye on pennsylvania. it may be arizona, you know, the one thing couple of harris has going for her is the female vote. i mean, every single pole is showing mostly because of the abortion issue, that women are really coming out of strong to vote for a couple of hair is the problem is, trump by far has the male vote. and unless those females can convince their husbands to do what they're doing. but you know this going to be an interesting book. how do you see the gender vote playing out, steve? well, i think the jim per gap is much bigger in favor of truck with me and then the gender gap is in favor of a. com. a lot of things tonight people are going to be looking at who's likable.

and i think ultimately those economic issues, women still do the majority of grocery shopping and when they go to the grocery store and it's cost more, right, cost more when they drive the kids to soccer practice in gas cost twice as much. you have trouble hone in on those issues. i think he does fine. the only get i would suggest to him that what she does want it for a tax and the debate. the points out that hey, that was pretty good and you did the whole thing. you just one exit. i'm amazed and surprise the kind of thing that will lock or offer game. it doesn't seem particularly me. yeah, yeah. he's had some great zingers in the past. like when he told by yeah, you killed medicare and also had a couple of them. uh the lock up moment, of course with the hillary clinton. by the way, do you think it serves as an advantage to truck the fact that he can't report live that he has to wait for his mike to be opened before he gets big? got helps them or hurts them. i think it helps. investment helps control his, his discipline in the 1st debate. i think you want that in this one. and her whole

strategy in this debate was to keep the mike's open. so when he did rhetoric, she could say, i'm speaking like she did with, with parents, mary, have the t shirts printed up, but now she can't do that. they've just wasted money on teachers, but now can't use. so you'll have to call this one, craig, just knowing what you know, and he's much more experienced debating. and she is, by the way, she has not been very good in the past, but she's also a prosecutor who's got a lot of experience picking publicly and challenging people. she went the law school when you go to law school, just one of the things i did you. so you're, i'm seeing it right now. pretty even what, what, what do you think is going to happen the night? if you have, if you had to make a call, who would you, who would you taken this horse race? well, if you get to play that drinking game for how many times kamala harris says, the word put in your january 6th are going to probably be drunk. within the 1st 20 minutes, but i have to agree completely with steve over here. they wanted those microns, they wanted to have those moments like they had in the 1st debate. last time where,

you know, donald trump looked like he was speaking at a term, and even the moderator was like mr. trump, you've agreed to these rules here. now you're breaking them. so i think this is benefiting donald trump to as well because it's gonna keep them in the zone. calm, cool, and collective and come all is not gonna get what you want. what i'm thinking though guys, i'm thinking, i hate to say this, but i, i because i went through this with my dad. i think donald trump is lost a little bit of a step. i don't think he's the same guy. he was for 8 years ago. i mean, he was so sharp and so on and lately i, i think he's, you know, he's, he's an older man and i don't think the functionality is, is precise as it used to be. i mean, that doesn't mean he can't do it and i'm not saying he's a senior i was buying or anything, but that might come into play here. what do you think, steve? i liked the sports of that. what do you, we just saw the college football 1st games and you saw big under dogs when the leaders that should have had it easy. they chopped. i mean, notre dame choked alabama almost job penn state almost chuck. generally the

favorite is as a higher propensity of choking than the underdog. but in this case, the pressure is all on kamala harris. yeah, she has to perform. i don't think she performs well under stress. she'll go into word salad and calculate. and if, if, if the pressure is on her, which it is. i think there's a high likelihood that she chokes. craig, you get the last word you agree? nope, i do not. i think that donald trump is missing these opportunities. he's not even attacking kamala. here is where she's week is because he's got to be tough on crime and use the immigrant crime. her record as a d. a and the attorney general in california is bad and he's not even using that to his advantage. and studies keeps calling her a communist. he's blowing it right now. this opportunity is okay, great conversation guys, smart stuff. and we all get to get your popcorn and maybe have an adult beverage with you. at least i will. and i'm going to watch this thing tonight with my family as are all americans. and i want to thank you guys for being here. hopefully we'll be able to talk about it in the post and then see if some of these prognostications

came through in a college football. but it may be just as fun. that's our show. remember, always be looking outside your own box. just don't live in boxes. i'm rick sanchez . i will be looking for you next to the there's no end in sight over how you're going to continue to destroy the earth. is the case for the med, most of the people. i tried to go to the gym, but i'm certainly not ready to fight russia. this is also of soon. this is the 3rd world lunacy re washing as for so the funder line likes to say, we have the tools while we just start with stability and business deal. so what is, let me let me on. you have very quick propaganda. you know a price here in new york. i think we don't know the aftermath any time that you're

not allowed to ask questions, you should ask all of the questions. the more questions ask a better. the answer is will be the, the closer to allow you to use it the web. it also, so i deep into russia all the guns exclusive reaction for most of the us, which they begins to look into the address they leave in the world of dark fantasies. one of those being an idea that in euclid power, which is russia can be defeated on the battlefield. this person loves more as a to us for the product slug it out, and the tv debates. at one point it becomes a fight for the affection the russian leader. it is well known that he said, of proving that he can do whatever the hell he wants and go into.