really low, it's not our trouble. is it means or is that wrong or on the words you would try to . so it just costs a month just to live in texas, and you didn't have a computer problem this. you didn't keep your problem who's in talking to. well, that's a high ranking chinese diplomat. interested guy. huh. and he's lecturing right to his face, warmer vice president. dick cheney. this is quite a moment. you got to see it. i'm going to show it to you. i'm rick sanchez, a suicide. the so i do want to start today with a conversation about war and peace, something we talked about a lot on this particular show. you know, it's funny, it's a simple thing, but it all comes down to the average guy or gal on the street right. if you ask the average person, somebody's mothers, somebody's dad, how they feel about war,

most will say, the want it stop it. right? but unfortunately, when it comes to war, it's not about what people want. never has been. right. i say that is because just today in the 2 largest complex that are taking place right now anywhere in the world. there are 2 poles. 2 poll. busy kids that are telling us what the average person wants and is thinking. here's the 1st one you already look at this one. it's conducted by the new york by the times of israel, the times of israel, obviously a drizzle on this paper. it finds that 60 percent of israelis want a cease fire, 60 percent of the people in that countries a stop this. they want the water and they want the hostages returned as already agreed to by both the mos and the international community. a see, that's not what the hawks there want. it's not what the is really wor, cabinet has interest in, and that's why they have obstructed this piece deal according to her records. by

the way, another newspaper in israel. it seems they need for the war to continue, so they can stay in power because the poll also finds that the majority of his re lease and this polls say they don't trust the prime minister. they don't trust prime minister netanyahu. there it is. look it up for yourself. okay. so when it comes to war, gaza is rarely citizens want a settlement and they want a negotiation of some kind. right. and you blame them. oh, what about the warranty crane? i'm glad you asked. look at this headline. this is the wall street journal, right? this, this, this one just came out. according to this, the journal is now reporting on some new polling out of ukraine, where they are citizens, again, the average joe, or the average mary out there. how they feel about the war and what they're saying is they want it. and now they want a negotiated truth with russia,

even if it means giving up the territory. this is the average ukrainian speaking. the article also includes an indicates at the number of ukrainians against the war has increased each month ever since the failed counter offensive. especially right now, does it matter what one poll finds or what another poll finds? sure it does. but not as much as this. the fact that the journal, which is a conservative and neil con newspaper would write this article is perhaps even more significant, i think then the ball itself. yeah. well, because it goes against what many of their faithful readers, the neo cons want. as we reported here yesterday, it's mail crowds like former under secretary of state victoria know, and they want there's war and ukraine to continue. she admitted it this, that it, i mean here she is. we planted on our show yesterday,

coughing to the fact that she stopped the ukrainians from signing a piece deal with russia that would have ended. there's more about a year and a half ago the ukrainians began asking for advice on where this thing was going and it became clear to us, clear to the brits, clear to others that prudence main condition was buried. and an amex, a to this document that they were working on. here's what i think about this wall street journal article. the fact that it is publishing the story suggests. there may be a slight shift in us public policy and maybe even public perception. i would argue that a year ago this story would never have been published. you wouldn't not have seen it. i can almost guarantee you that because the western media,

as we've been watching that has been dog. i mean dog, good image, desire to only report report pro ukrainian stories, obvious. that's what they've done. even going to the point of saying they're winning the war even when they're not waiting the war. but now we're starting to see some examples of more. i don't know, i maybe the word is honest reporting good pasta. drug deal is in for manila. i guess. i guess what i asked myself is, or do you think they're reporting is different because it reality is setting into them or are they getting or sending signals to somebody that may be there is some kind of policy shift. why is that? why are we seeing this? well, i definitely think it's getting and by the way, rick, i heard that victoria new and brought cookies to this interview to as well. it's book a, i think the foreign policy apparatus is looking for an offer him, you know, they've let this money laundering scheme go far too long. and the people are

starting, you know, they're starting to get a hip to what's going on. so i think they're trying to find a way, get an off lamp and move on to the next for an intervention in which they can mess with the jo taxpayer dollars they were you. um, i was taking it back by this by the wall street journal report. i didn't think the journal would be reporting something like this. because when you read the article, it's not like they really have the goods. it's not a very specific poll. it just says look, we've been monitoring this and with each passing month, fewer and fewer ukrainians are in favor of this war. more and more ukrainians are saying stop this crap now. so i was surprised that the journal wrote the story were, you know, i don't think so. i think they have to try to act like there's some legitimacy to what's going on. i think we all remember the iraq war. yeah. with the new york times when the delivery paper was talking about if you need to go with there and take care of saddam hussein, i know how to do it in a week. yeah. and they did it quite quickly. right. so i think this is kind of like this, this, this reasoning absorbs when it comes to the people isn't in the main stream. media news. knowing that they have to have some form of legitimacy and understanding that

the people don't want this warning more. so they got a problem a little bit on it by almost all right, but i almost feel like victoria knew in just under kind of 2 people over there at the state department who knows or been some other office somewhere in our government who watched that interview she did where she gave away the goods and they just said, what the hell is she doing? and you know, i would think that, but i mean this woman, you know, she's been caught with a phone call. she's been in and out of different administrations, and we remember who she's married to mr. kagan like, you know, this is their language, rick? not our 1st bad, rody. oh, good side of it. my sound, many of them people who work for us in this country, and this is the stuff the craig and i were just talking about it. we talked about this all the time. either elected or appointed are incentivized by the system to encourage wars that most of us don't want. i mean, i don't want that for my kids. i don't want that for my grand daughter. but for those people who are extremely powerful and, and they often have interlocking interests where they serve more than one master.

you understand what i'm saying? and there's no better example of that. then the training, right? i mean, he's literally a leading figure in the military industrial complex president of a company that made billions of wars who went on that to become the vice president of the united states, and then sold us the american people auto war. wow. what a surprise mostly through lies, by the way. i mean this guy is the neo cons neil con. right? and that is why i find this next clip that i'm gonna share with you so fascinating and with, and with you to, you're going to like this guy, cuz this is really interesting. here's a, a chinese leader. it's like a little old man. he seems, you know, just a diminutive guy, right. and he's lecturing the former vice president the united states. and he tells him essentially this. he says, you are now doing to others what the british once did to you. you have learned nothing from your lessons, mr. vice president, he sense it says that you were nothing from your experience. watch when you became

the number one, you call me the number one unit to the power you became a students and then also your to fall. well, boss, the british you want to for the others, is nigel. hundreds of you join the other west and impurities 4 or 4. you'll be the china in the 1950s america to be the lead to your rates, the grand and you soon. and you made a lot of trouble in the middle east and then around around the words you had tried to. so it just costs a month to live in texas and it didn't. and the computer problem is i'll do as a ton of munitions. i was quite happy to thank you for me for you. what to do with me, the chance, remember,

so if i remember the and, and i, i hope i was hoping we could keep that cut away there at the end because the camera shifts to mr. tracy's face. and he's like, you know, he's got that cheney look where, but i, you know, i find this fascinating because i think we're going to see more and more of this. where some of these folks in the united states are being discovered and look, i'm not saying they're bad people. i'm just saying that the policies that they're enacting for a long time been the kinds of policies that hurt other countries. and for the most part, we never heard that story. we're starting to hear it more now. right? absolutely. you know, is the truth about it is rick, is that america is become what it used to hate? i mean, that's not so much the people the ruling class. the problem is the ruling class isn't scared of the people. so until the people scare the ruling class, i'm going to see a lot more of this. we're going to see

a lot more of this bullying attitude. that's a fascinating thing that you just said. how does the, how do we, the people scare the ruling class or we do that? well, pitch forks for one, but i think uh, the last time i remember the ruling class was scared. i think it was during the iraq war when it just started off. right. before it became bushes war, there were so many people in the street. i think that was the 1st but all right, but, but you know what happens if people went on the streets tomorrow? and so i did not put this thing with guys in this thing with ukraine, and that's why i'm sending $200000000000.00 over there. let's keep that money here and take care of ourselves. if somebody says that, here's the problem. if a $100000.00 people went on the streets and said that cnn wouldn't cover. yeah, they give it 15 seconds. so we got sick talk. we got instagram, we got facebook, we got social media, now we have this weapon. and yes, that will be sensor too. yeah, but we gotta get out there. we gotta stay out there. you being in the case of dick cheney that his announcement that he's going to go with cala harris. i got to ask you this because speaking of dick cheney and we're about to talk in the next

segment about a debate that there was so much bravado on the part of the dams brag and about the fact that they had the, the cheney endorsement of daughter and father, or does that, do you think the wrong to play it that way? that the average young person looked at as if that's a joke. they've completely lost the plot. i think they're waiting on an endorsement from satan next. i mean, what, what are they thinking? listen, i, i can't make sense of this will be here. yeah, whatsoever, but this is not an endorsement you want as a democrat, as a left this as a level. so it just blows my mind that they even made that announcement. yeah, one of the, one of the pod cast that i listen to a lot when i'm driving my car and obviously we live in this world. so we're constantly in this stuff. and the host on that show said that it's like she got an invoice endorsement from a war criminal. and, and i've heard that repeated more and more often. so i'm not sure that's gonna play for them. i think it might work against them in many ways, or at least they should have laid it out a little bit differently. all right, let's do this. when we come back,

craig is gonna stay stick around. we're going to be right here, right? you're not gonna go anywhere, i'll say right now, but she deals going to join us as well for a block for the block. it's talking about new polling that just come in. that for the 1st time is not good news for vice president harris. oh, and there's this debate tonight, did you hear that? we're talking about that to get right back. stay right there. the if you think about russia, what is your mind to picture the landscapes open up before your eyes? the 11 does you imagine

the the discard starts to johnny the are you ready to come along the hey, welcome back. i'm rick sanchez. you ready? i'm going to show you a 3 shot ready? boom. there's a famous 3 box. and in that box, you will see greg pasta do like a host of the combo couch. and steve, go, who's an attorney and a conservative political commentator. i understand you guys know each other. right? very well. i know that yes, the very well we do. i do, we show often. so that should make for a better conversation. so here's what's going on. gentleman relieve, has dwindled for a couple of harris, you know, in this thing has been so episodic,

the latest adventure of, as the campaign turns, had come to a hair is way up because. busy as well, she did well during the democratic convention and because she was anointed into this position and because a lot of people really did not like bite. and so she became an alternative. and that really worked or a favor. she was a by as many as 6 or 7 points in a new york times paul, one year of times paul now has her up. i know, sorry, has trumped up by one point. she's losing, for the 1st time she is losing this raise, which makes it really interesting. first of all, i was the, let me bring in your experience on this, your reaction to the fact that she's now losing the race and to what do you attribute it? yeah, she's a little bit like hillary clinton and the more people saw hillary clinton, the worst hillary did, the more people get to know tom, a lot with the cat goals and the word salads. and we did name policies the last day like are in the new york times theater. paul is particularly illustrative. and that

this same pole at this same time, at joe by leading by about 10 points as hillary clinton leading by adopting points . the fact that she's not leading in this poll, which over. busy democrats, which is still registered voters instead of likely voters meeting its tilted towards democrats. i think is disastrous for harrison i think puts the pressure on or in the debate because she has to perform. she did not perform well in the interview. and by the way, i don't think the media's that interested in this debate, they don't have the timeline scrolling at the bottom, how many hours and minutes and seconds until the debate. i think they're trying to not have people watch it because they don't want to see or have another flaming disaster. by the way, just to correct you on one thing. this particular poll that just came out with the new york times, they over pulled republicans, not democrats, which is why some people are saying that it looks like this is winning. but again, it's one poll, and i always tell viewers. don't get too excited about one poll because take another one in a 24 hours and, and it, and it could change up. craig, do you,

do you think that she has lost her last or somewhat as the times as reporting and to what do you attribute it to? well, i have to agree completely with steve. the more she talks, the more people dislike her. but i also think the fact that the opposite didn't show up that a convention go to really, or who knows, the more, the more that she gets out there, the more the people going to realize that she doesn't have a plan. she seems to be copying all of donald trump on everything a no tax on tips. let's go with that. that sounds good. yeah. she has no policies up on our website for crying out loud. so under this goes, the more she's going to get an old to be for none of them to. this is the least policy centric. uh, campaign i have ever seen uh drum kits up there, stumbles mumbles, about whatever. who the hell knows what he's even talking about. she gets up there and basically just says good isms, because essentially she doesn't want to get specific about any policies. and in the end i, i just think we all lose out as americans. here's where we are right now. i'm gonna

show you exactly what the latest battle ground states look like. put up that map if you could, victor, and we're all going to look at this thing together. now you can see right there all the states and read those belong to truck drop will window states, everything in blue that belongs to harris harris will window states. so then what we have left is florida and georgia there at the bottom. just above that you see north carolina and then you see pennsylvania, and then you'll see wisconsin in michigan. right. and that all the way out west. you see nevada and you see arizona, those are the states that are not you have to be determined. now some of those you can probably give to some people, but the ones a when the states, that's the person who's going to be the next part of united states. and if you really want to focus it on one state, look at pennsylvania. this election will most likely be determined by who wins the state of pennsylvania. so tonight, thanks victor. to night, when these 2 candidates get together and they debates, it really is going to be about who can convince people of pennsylvania to vote for

them. what would you do if you were the strategist for either one of these? uh, mr. gil, your 1st of all, as he gets prompt to keep his comments, you know, under control be just a play which is going to be a challenge to him. but no matter what the questionnaire has talked about, inflation, the economy and illegal immigration. i think if he can stay on those and, and kind of avoid some of the via text, i think he does very well. i think if she can be like football, seemed to be coherent, seemed to be smart, all of which might be impossible for me. she may be able to do all right. if this is all about attacking trump, i don't think she'll look presidential. i don't think she'll convince people. and the thing i would point out about pennsylvania is you have pittsburgh and philadelphia that are both blue pittsburgh more because of unions. and i'm not sure that the democrats are going to do as well there as usual. but in between, you essentially have alabama, it's read in between. so pennsylvania advise you comes out to turn now,

what do you think, craig about the fact that they're not allowed to interrupt each other? they're going to mute their microphone. so when one is talking, the other one is not allowed to talk or they can talk, but no one's going to hear them. um and, and also the fact that steve just made a really interesting point, it would be not smart for her to do. but hillary did in the past and just attack him because there's nothing she can say about him. i think that most americans don't already know. i don't think she wants to necessarily attack them. i think she wants to set him off. we saw his rally in wisconsin, and he called kamala conrad time and time again. i mean to me, he's blowing this right now, but what it comes also to the election, i want to point out that you have it right on the nose when it comes to pennsylvania. but i think this election is more about how you can vote not just who can vote. so the areas that have mass mailing ballots, absentee ballots, invalid harvesting, they're going to favor the democrats at nevada is going to go to kamala, but i think you can take george off the table for her, and that's going to go to president trump. so i think you hit it on the nose and

from what i hear rick in pennsylvania, it's all about the latino vote. they're going after the latino vote. that's where kamala harris is vulnerable. and that's what donald trump is trying to pick ups a boat. so keep an eye on pennsylvania, it may be arizona, you know, the one thing come on, harris has going for her. is the female vote, i mean, every single pole is showing mostly because of the abortion issue, that women are really coming out of strong to vote for a couple of. here's the problem is, trump by far has the male vote. and unless those females can convince their husbands to do what they're doing. but you know this going to be an interesting book. how do you see the gender vote playing out, steve? well, i think the gym or gap is much bigger in favor of truck with me and then the gender gap is in favor of tom. a lot of things tonight people are going to be looking at who's likable. and i think ultimately those economic issues, women still do the majority of grocery shopping and when they go to the grocery store and it's cost more, right,

cost more when they drive the kids to soccer practice and gas cost twice as much if trouble hone in on those issues, i think he does fine, the only get it, i would suggest to him that what she does want it for a tax and the debate. she points out that hey, that was pretty good and you did the whole thing and just one exit. i'm amazed and surprised. that's the kind of thing that will lock or offer game. it doesn't seem particularly me. yeah, yeah. he's had some great zingers in the past. like when he told by yeah, you killed medicare and also had a couple of them. uh, the lock up moment, of course, with the hillary clinton. by the way, do you think it serves as an advantage to trump the fact that he can't retort live, that he has to wait for his mike to be opened before he could speak. that helps him or heard some i think it helps. investment helps control his, his discipline in the 1st debate. i think you want that in this one. and her whole strategy in this debate was to keep the mike's open. so when he did rhetoric, she could say, i'm speaking like she did with, with parents,

and they're already have the t shirts printed up. but now she can't do that. they've just wasted money on teachers. they now can't use. so you'll have to call this one, craig, just knowing what you know, and he's much more experienced debating. and she is, by the way, she has not been very good in the past, but she's also a prosecutor who's got a lot of experience picking publicly and challenging people. she went the law school when you go to law school, just one of the things i didn't you. so you're, i'm seeing it right now pretty even what, what, what do you think is going to happen? and i, if you have, if you had to make a call, who would you, who would you taken this horse race? well, if you get to play that drinking game for how many times kamala harris says, the word put in your january 6th are going to probably be drunk within the 1st 20 minutes. but i have to agree completely with steve over here. they wanted those microns, they wanted to have those moments like they had in the 1st debate last time where, you know, donald trump looked like he was speaking at a term, and even the moderator was like mr. trump, you've agreed to these rules here. and now you're breaking up, so i think this is benefiting donald trump to as well because it's gonna keep them

in the zone. calm, cool, and collective income. i was not gonna get what you want. what i'm thinking though guys, i'm thinking, i hate to say this, but i, i because i went through this with my dad. i think donald trump is lost a little bit of a step. i don't think he's the same guy. he was for 8 years ago. i mean, he was so sharp and so on and lately i, i think he's, you know, he's, he's an older man and, and i don't think the functionality is, is precise as it used to be. i mean, that doesn't mean he can't do it, and i'm not saying he's a see now is buying or anything, but that might come into play here. what do you think, steve? i liked the sports analogy. we just saw the college football 1st games. and you saw big under dogs when the, the leaders that should have had it easy. they chopped, i mean the other day and choked, alabama almost just been state almost chuck generally the favorite is as a higher propensity of choking than the underdog. but in this case, the pressure is all on kamala harris. yeah,

she has to perform. i don't think she performs well under stress. she'll go into word salad and calculate. and if, if, if the pressure is on her, which it is, i think there's a high likelihood that she chokes. craig, you get the last word you agree? nope, i do not. i think the donald trump is missing these opportunities. he's not even attacking kamala, here with which he's weak, is because he's got to be tough on crime and use the immigrant crime. her record as a d. a and the attorney general in california is bad, and he's not even using that to his advantage. some studies keeps calling her a communist. he's blowing it right now. missed opportunities. okay, great conversation, guys, smart stuff. and we all get to get your popcorn and maybe have an adult beverage with you. at least i will. and i'm going to watch this thing tonight with my family as are all americans. and i want to thank you guys for being here. hopefully we'll be able to talk about it in the post and then see if some of these prognostications came through in college football. but it may be just as bon, that's our show. remember, always be looking outside your own box. just don't live in boxes. i'm rick sanchez

. i won't be looking for you next time. the . the 1937 militaristic, japan started a full scale invasion of china. the invading army was rapidly advancing towards the capital of the republic of china. of the dies, the city of nice being, leaving behind the burned down villages and thousands of the dead. on december 13th, the japanese occupied on z and states the real massacre. for 6 weeks,

the invaders exterminated the civilian population. they carried out mass executions, rates, women, and were engaged, been merciless robbery, ruthless competition of 2 officers of the imperial army. so c i t my guide and to yoshi, no to gain particular notoriety. they competed with each other as to who would be the fastest to kill $100.00 chinese with a sword. this monstrous competition was widely rewarded in the japanese press. the nuns being massacre claims the lives of about 300000 people and became one of the largest crimes against humanity in the world history. after world war 2, manufactures advance of the atrocity phase trial. however, the commander of the japanese army, in the non seeing operation freezes, yasu e to

a socket, was able to escape the responsibility due to the interference of the american administration. the the, what is part of the, is this evelyn? is it a poly would pose good, isn't the deep su, wasn't that in the word part? is it something deeper, more complex might be present? let's stop without collision. let's go out of hey, man, altogether. we were all supposed to come together. this shot after shot. the deer it was

asking where's tory, where's course to hear them say d o a. so we knew he was gone. my name's kamani carter and i'm fairly certain the lifestyle for gang related job. i have been 9 years. my victim was in a she was also a student who is attending college. she's names quite a bit. very young kids. same as we're getting involved in renders file is 20 to 30 years ago. but i think there's no question that the kitchen crips from the la came up here and see this area. all mostly is either in prison now forever for day

this one is the for us secretary of state onto the blanket and is british col, deposit arriving key and commenting on the supply of long read muscles to pm. out of the blinking claims of washington does still consider the dangers of escalation as washington that is closer to allowing ukraine to use its weapons to strive deep into russia. our team gets exclusive reaction from moscow. us which they begin to look into the adage, they leave the world of dark fantasies. one of those being in the idea that a nuclear power, which is russia can be defeated on the battle nose praise for political disputes. so here is rocket carry.