or was forced to recognize malay in independence. the resilience of them a late people put an end to the history of british colonialism in south east asia. the russian states never as one of the most sense community best to him then i'll send, send up the keys 195 and speed. the one else calls question about this, even though we will then in the european union, the kremlin machine, the state on russia to day and split the r t spoke neck, even our video agency, roughly all the band on youtube, the payment services question. did you say stephen twist, which is the

if you think about russia, what does your mind picture the landscapes open up before your eyes? the last one does, can you imagine the, the discounts dodge the journey? the,

are you ready to come along the sanchez here. this is a direct impact and this is a, some of what we're going to be talking about. you know, a lot of trouble in the middle east and the around around the world. you had tried to so it just called a month used to live in texas, and you were dealing with computer chrome. this you didn't keep. you're probably talking to. well, that's a high ranking chinese diplomat. interested guy. huh. and he's lecturing right to his face, former vice president, dick cheney. this is quite a moment. you gotta see it. i'm going to show it to you. i'm rick sanchez, a suicide. the so i do want to start today with a conversation about war and peace,

something we talked about a lot on this particular show, you know, so it's funny, it's a simple thing, but it all comes down to the average guy or gal on the street right. if you ask the average person, somebody's mothers, somebody's dad, how they feel about war, most will say, the want it stop it. right? but unfortunately, when it comes to war, it's not about what people want. never has been. right. i say that is because just today in the 2 largest conflicts that are taking place right now, anywhere in the world, there are 2 poles, 2 poles that are telling us what the average person wants and this think it. here's the 1st one you already look at. this one is conducted by the mirror by the times of israel, the times of israel. obviously a jerusalem newspaper. it finds at 60 percent of israelis want a ceasefire. 60 percent of the people in that country as a stop this, they want the war and they want the hostages returned as already agreed to by both

a moss and the international community. the that's not what the hawks their want. it's not what the is really wor, cabinet has an interest in, and that's why they have obstructed this piece deal according to her records. by the way, another newspaper in israel. it seems they need for the war to continue . so they can stay in power because the poll also finds that the majority of his re lease and this polls say they don't trust the prime minister. they don't trust the prime minister netanyahu. there it is. look it up for yourself. okay? so when it comes to war, gaza is rarely citizens want a settlement and they want a negotiation of some kind. right. and you blame them. oh, what about the warn you crane? i'm glad you asked. look at this headlines. this is a wall street journal, right? this, this, this one just came out. according to this,

the journal is now reporting on some new polling out of ukraine, where they are citizens, again, the average joe, or the average mary out there. how they feel about the war and what they're saying is they want it. and now they want a negotiated truth with russia, even if it means giving up the territory. this is the average ukrainian speaking. the article also includes and indicates that the number of ukrainians against the war has increased each month ever since the failed calendar offensive. especially right now, does it matter what one poll finds or what another pole finds? sure it does, but not as much as this. the fact that the journal, which is a conservative and neil con newspaper would write this article is perhaps even more significant, i think then the ball itself. yeah. well, because it goes against what many of their faithful readers,

the neo cons want. as we reported here yesterday, it's mail guns like former under secretary of state, victoria. no. and what there's war and ukraine to continue. she admitted it this saturday. i mean, here she is, as we plated on our show yesterday, coughing to the fact that she stopped the ukrainians from signing a piece deal with russia that would've ended. there's more about a year and a half ago the ukrainians began asking for advice on where this thing was going. and it became clear to us, clear to the brits, clear to others that put in this main condition was buried and an annex a to this document that they were working on. here's what i think about this wall street journal article. the fact that it is publishing the story suggests,

there may be a slight shift in us public policy and maybe even public perception. i would argue that a year ago this story would never have been published. you wouldn't not have seen it. i can almost guarantee you that because the western media, as we've been watching that has been dog. i mean dog, good image, desire to only report report pro ukrainian stories obvious. that's what they've done. even going to the point of saying they're winning the war even when they're not winning the war. but now we're starting to see some examples of more. i don't know, i maybe the word is honest reporting. good pasta, drug deal as inform manila, i guess. i guess what i asked myself is, or do you think they're reporting is different because a reality is setting into them or are they getting or sending signals to somebody that may be there is some kind of policy shift. why is that?

why are we seeing this? well, i definitely think it's getting em. and by the way, rick, i heard that victoria knew and brought cookies to this interview too as well. it's book. 2 i think the foreign policy apparatus is looking for an offer him, you know, they've let this money laundering scheme go far too long. and the people are starting, you know, they're starting to get a hip to what's going on. so i think they're trying to find a way, get an off ramp and move on to the next for an intervention in which they can mess with the jo taxpayer dollars. were you um, i was taking a bank by this by the wall street journal report. i didn't think the journal would be reporting something like this because when you read the article, it's not like they really have the goods. it's not a very specific poll. it just says look, we've been monitoring this and with each passing month, fewer and fewer ukrainians are in favor of this war. more and more ukrainians are saying stop this crap now. so i was surprised that the journal wrote the story were, you know, i don't think so. i think they have to try to act like there's some legitimacy to what's going on. i think we all remember the iraq war. yeah. with the new york

times when the delivery paper was talking about and you need to go in there and take care of saddam hussein. i'm going to do it in a week. yeah. and they did it quite quickly. right. so i think this is kind of like this, this, this reasoning absorbs when it comes to the people in, in the main stream media news. knowing that they have to have some form of legitimacy and understanding that the people don't want this warning more. so they got a problem a little bit on it by almost all right, but i almost feel like victoria knew and just under kind of 2 people over there at the state department, who knows or been some other office somewhere in our government who watch that interview she did where she gave away the goods and they just said, what the hell is she doing? and you know, i would think that, but i mean this woman, you know, she's been caught with a phone call. she's been in and out of different administrations, and we remember who she's married to mr. kagan like, you know, this is their language, rick? not our 1st bad, rody. oh, good side of it. my sound, many of them people who work for us in this country, and this is the stuff the craig and i were just talking about it. we talked about this all the time. either elected or appointed are incentivized by the system to

encourage wars that most of us don't want. i mean, i don't want that for my kids. i don't want that for my grand daughter. but for those people who are extremely powerful and, and they often have interlocking interests where they serve more than one master. you understand what i'm saying? and there's no better example of that. then the training, right? i mean, he's literally a leading figure in the military industrial complex president of a company that made billions of wars who went on that to become the vice president of the united states, and then sold us the american people auto war. wow. what a surprise mostly through lies, by the way. i mean this guy is the neo cons neil con. right? and that is why i find this next clip that i'm gonna share with you so fast. i think i'm with and with you to, you're going to like this guy cuz this is really interesting. here's a, a chinese leader. it's like a little old man. he seems, you know, just a diminutive guy. right. and he's lecturing the former vice president the united

states, and it tells him essentially this. he says, you are now doing to others what the british once did to you. you have learned nothing from your lessons, mr. vice president. he sense it says that you were nothing from your experience watch when you became a member, when you come to me the yeah, number one unit to the power you became the students and then also you're the fall. well boss, the british you want to for the others. yeah, nigel, i'd rather you join the other west and impurities for roy to, you'll be the china in the 1950s america was a lead to your rates. the correct and use of that. and you'll meet a lot of trouble in the middle east and the around around the words you tried to.

so it just called a month used to live in texas and you were dealing with computer chrome is hooked up. i'll do as a ton of munitions. i was quite happy to send for you for me for you what to do with me, the chance remember so if i remember the n n i, i hope i was hoping we could keep that cut away there at the end because the camera shifts to mister tracy's face, and he's like, you know, it's got that cheney look where, but i, you know, i find this fascinating because i think we're going to see more and more of this. where some of these folks in the united states are being discovered and look, i'm not saying they're bad people. i'm just saying that the policies that they're enacting for a long time been the kinds of policies that hurt other countries. and for the most part, we never heard that story. we're starting to hear it more now. right?

absolutely. you know, is the truth about it is rick, is that america is become what it used to hate? i mean, that's not so much the people the moving class. the problem is the ruling class isn't scared of the people. so until the people scare the ruling class, i'm going to see a lot more this. we're going to see a lot more of this bullying attitude. that's a fascinating thing that you just said. how does the, how do we, the people scare the ruling class or we do this? well, pitch forks for one, but i think uh, the last time i remember the ruling class was scared. i think it was during the iraq war when it just started off. right. before it became bushes war, there were so many people in the street. i think that was the 1st time. right. but, but you know what happens if people went on the streets tomorrow? and so i did not put this thing with god's in this thing with ukraine. and that's why i'm sending $200000000000.00 over there. let's keep that money here and take care of ourselves. if somebody says that, here's the problem. if a $100000.00 people went on the street and said that cnn wouldn't cover. yeah, but give it 15 seconds. so we got sick talk. we got instagram, we got facebook,

we got social media, now we have this weapon and yes, that will be sensor too. yeah. but we gotta get out there. we gotta stay out there . you being in the case of dick cheney, that his announcement that he's going to go with calmer harris. i got to ask you this because speaking of dick cheney and we're about to talk in the next segment about a debate that there was so much bravado on the part of the dams bragging about. the fact that they had the, the cheney endorsement of daughter and father the does that this is the wrong to play it. that way. that the average young person looked at businesses. that's a joke. they've completely lost the plot. i think they're waiting on an endorsement from state and next. i mean what, what are the banking? listen i, i can't make sense of this will be here. yeah, whatsoever, but this is not an endorsement you want as a democrat, as a left us as a level. so it just blows my mind that they even made that announcement. yeah, one of the, one of the pod cast that i listen to a lot when i'm driving my car and obviously we live in this world. so we're

constantly in this stuff. and the host on that show said that it's like she got an invoice endorsement from a war criminal. and, and i've heard that repeated more and more often. so i'm not sure that's going to play for them. i think it might work against them in many ways. or at least they should have laid it out a little bit differently. all right, let's do this. when we come back, craig is going to stay stick around, we're going to be right here, right? you're not gonna go anywhere. i'll say, right? yeah. but she deals going to join us as well for our blog, for the blog. it's talking about the new polling that just come in. that for the 1st time is not good news for vice president harris. oh, and there's this debate tonight. did you hear that? we're talking about that to get right back to the right there. the historical you in the west freedom of speech was deemed are right and not a privilege. it appears. this is no longer the case. this is also the case with the latest iteration over russia. gatos only right speech because a lot the point where you

can see what we can send it to the most single slide. but the task ok. do you guys do you guys love us? is that possible? duddy, a little quick looking for. so some people the air conditioner as well as the one that i have to put up on the 15. yeah. with the other stuff and i do see there with these reasoning. they don't put me in yet. well, the business that i've had or the

the, the hey, welcome back. i'm rick sanchez. you're ready. i'm gonna show you a 3 shot ready? boom. there's the same as 3 bucks. add in that box. you will see greg post do like a host of the combo couch and steve go, who's an attorney and a conservative political commentator. i understand you guys know each other. right . very well. i know that. yeah, the very well we do a i do show often. so that should make for a better conversation. so here's what's going on. gentleman really has dwindled for a couple of harris, you know, and this thing has been so episodic, the latest adventure of, as the campaign turns, had come, a hair is way up. because well, she did well during the democratic convention and because she was anointed into this position and because a lot of people really did not like bite. and so she became an alternative. and

that really worked for a favor. she was a by as many as 6 or 7 points in a new york times paula new york times. paul now has her up. i know. sorry, has trumped up by one point. she's losing, but the 1st time she is losing the best res, which makes it really interesting. first of all, i was the, let me bring in, uh, your uh, experience on this uh, your reaction to the fact that she's now losing the race and to what do you attribute it. you know, she's a little bit like hillary clinton and the more people saw hillary clinton, the worst hillary did, the more people get to know tom, a love with the cat goals and the word salads and the name policies. the less they lighter and the new york times theatre, paul is particularly illustrative. and then this same poll at this same time, at joe by leading by about 10.10, he'll reclaim leading by adopting points. the fact that she's not reading in this poll, which over. busy democrats, which is still registered voters instead of likely voters meeting its tilted

towards democrats. i think is disastrous for harrison i think puts the pressure on or in the debate because she has to perform. she does not perform well in the interview. and by the way, i don't think the media's that interested in this debate, they don't have the timeline scrolling at the bottom, how many hours and minutes and seconds until the debate. i think they're trying to not have people watch it because they don't want to see or have another flaming disaster, by the way, just to collect 2 on one thing. this particular poll that just came out with a new york times, they over pulled republicans, not democrats, which is why some people are saying that it looks like this is winning. but again, it's one poll, and i always tell viewers. don't get too excited about one poll because take another one and a 24 hours and, and it, and it could change up. craig, do you, do you think that she has lost her last or somewhat as the times is reporting and to what do you attribute it to? well, i have to agree it completely with steve. the more she talks to more people dislike or, but i also think the fact that the opposite didn't show up to the convention good

or really, or who knows the more the more that she gets out there, the more the people going to realize that she doesn't have a plan, she seems to be copying all of donald trump on everything a no tax on tips. let's go with that. that sounds good. yeah. she has no policies up on our website for crying out loud longer. this goes, the more she's going to get an old to be for none of them do. this is the least policy centric of campaign i have ever seen. a trump gets up there, stumbled mumbles, about whatever. who the hell knows what he's even talking about. she gets up there and basically just says good isms because essentially she doesn't want to get specific about any policies. and in the end i, i just think we all. busy lose out as americans. here's where we are right now. i'm gonna show you exactly what the latest battle ground states look like. put up that map if you could, victor. and we're all going to look at this thing together. now you can see right there all the states and read those belong to trump. drop will, windows states, everything in blue that belongs to harris harris will windows states. so then what

we have left is florida and georgia there at the bottom. just above that you see north carolina and then you'll see pennsylvania, and then you'll see wisconsin in michigan. right. and that all the way out west, you see nevada and you see arizona, those are the states that are not yet to be determined. now some of those you can probably give to some people, but the ones a when the states, that's the person who is going to be the next part of the united states. and if you really want to focus it on one state, look at pennsylvania. this election will most likely be determined by who wins the state of pennsylvania. so tonight, thanks victor. to night, when these 2 candidates get together and they debates, it really is going to be about who can convince people of pennsylvania to vote for them. what would you do if you were the strategist for either one of these? uh, mr. gil, your 1st of all, i think if prompt you keep his comments, you know, under control be just a play which is going to be

a challenge to him. but no matter what the questionnaire has talked about, inflation, the economy and illegal immigration. i think if he can stay on those and, and kind of avoid some of the via text, i think he does very well. i think if she can be like football, seemed to be coherent, seemed to be smart, all of which might be a possible for me. she may be able to do all right. if this is all about attacking trump, i don't think she'll look presidential. i don't think she'll convince people. and the thing i would point out about pennsylvania is you have pittsburgh and philadelphia that are both blue pittsburgh more because of unions. and i'm not sure that the democrats are going to do as well there as usual. but in between, you essentially have alabama, it's read in between. so pennsylvania advise you comes out to turn now, what do you think, craig about the fact that they're not allowed to interrupt each other? they're going to mute their microphone. so when one is talking, the other one is not allowed to talk or they can talk, but no one's going to hear them. um and, and also the fact that steve just made a really interesting point, it would be not smart for her to do. but hillary did in the past and just attack

him because there's nothing she can say about him. i think that most americans don't already know what i'll do. she wants to necessarily attack them. i think she wants to set him off. we saw his rally in wisconsin, and he called kamala conrad time and time again. i mean to me, he's blowing this right now, but what it comes also to the election, i want to point out that you have it right on the nose when it comes to pennsylvania. but i think the selection is more about how you can vote not just who can vote. so the areas that have mass mailing ballots, absentee ballots, invalid harvesting, they're going to favor the democrats at nevada is going to go to kamala, but i think you can take george off the table for her, and that's going to go to president trump. so i think you hit it on the nose and from what i hear rick in pennsylvania, it's all about the latino vote. they're going after the latino vote. that's where kamala harris has vulnerable, and that's what donald trump is trying to pick ups a boat. so keep an eye on pennsylvania and maybe arizona, you know, the one thing come on, harris has going for her. is the female vote, i mean,

every single pole is showing mostly because of the abortion issue, that women are really coming out of strong to vote for a couple of harris. the problem is, trump by far has the male vote. and unless those females can convince their husbands to do what they're doing. but you know this going to be an interesting book. how do you see the gender vote playing out, steve? well, i think the gym or gap is much bigger in favor of truck with me and then the gender gap is in favor of of com. a lot of things tonight people are going to be looking at who's likable. and i think ultimately those economic issues, women still do the majority of grocery shopping and when they go to the grocery store and it's cost more, right, cost more when they drive the kids to soccer practice in gas cost twice as much if trouble holding on those issues, i think he does fine, the only get it, i would suggest to him that what she does want it for a tax and the debate. the points out that hey, that was pretty good and you did that whole thing of just one exit. i'm amazed and

surprise the kind of thing but will not draw per day. it doesn't seem particularly me. yeah, yeah. he's had some great zingers in the past. like when he uh, told by yeah, you killed medicare and also had a couple of them. uh, the lock up moment, of course, with the hillary clinton. by the way, do you think it serves as an advantage to trump the fact that he can't retort live, that he has to wait for his mike to be open before he gets big. that helps him or hurts him. i think it helps investment helped to control his, his discipline in the 1st debate. i think you want that in this one. and her whole strategy in this debate was to keep the mike's open. so when he did rhetoric, she could say, i'm speaking like she did with, with parents really have the t shirts printed up, but now she can't do that. they've just wasted money on teachers, but now can't use. so you don't have to call this one, craig, just knowing what you know, he's much more experienced debating than she is by the way. she has not been very

good in the past, but she's also a prosecutor who's got a lot of experience picking publicly and challenging people. she went to law school when you go to law school, just one of the things i didn't you. so you're, i'm seeing it right now, pretty even what, what, what do you think is going to happen to know if you had, if you had to make a call, who would you, who would you're taking this horse race? well, if you're gonna play that drinking game for how many times kamala harris says, the word put in your january 6th are going to probably be drunk within the 1st 20 minutes. but i have to agree completely with steve over here. they want to those microns, they wanted to have those moments like they had in the 1st debate last time where, you know, donald trump looked like he was speaking at a term, and even the moderator was like mr. trump, you agreed to these rules here. and now you're breaking up, so i think this is benefiting donald trump to as well because it's gonna keep them in the zone. calm, cool, and collect of income. i was not going to get what you were. what i'm thinking though guys, i'm thinking, i hate to say this, but i, i because i went through this with my dad. i think donald trump is lost a little bit of a step. i don't think he's the same guy. he was for 8 years ago. i mean,

he was so sharp and so on and lately i, i think he's, you know, he's, he's an older man and, and i don't think the functionality is precise as it used to be. i mean, that doesn't mean he can't do it, and i'm not saying he's a see now is biden or anything, but that might come into play here. what do you think, steve? i liked the sports analogy. we just saw the college football 1st games. and you saw big under dogs when the leaders that should have had it easy. they chopped, i mean the other day and choked, alabama almost chuck been state almost chuck generally the favorite is as a higher propensity of choking than the under dog. but in this case, the pressure is all on kamala harris. yeah, she has to perform. i don't think she performs well under stress. she'll go into word salad and calculate. and if, if, if the pressure is on her, which it is, i think there's a high likelihood that she chokes. craig, you get the last word you agree? nope, i do not. i think that donald trump is missing these opportunities. he's not even

attacking kamala, here with where she's week is because he's got to be tough on crime and use the immigrant crime. her record as a d. a and the attorney general in california is bad, and he's not even using that to his advantage. instead he's keeps calling her a communist. he's blowing it right now mr. opportunities. okay, great conversation, guys, smart stuff. and we all get to get your popcorn and maybe have an adult beverage with you. at least i will. and i'm going to watch this thing tonight with my family as are all americans. and i want to thank you guys for being here. hopefully we'll be able to talk about it in the post and then see if some of these prognostications came through it in college. football, but it may be just as fun. that's our show. remember, always be looking outside your own box, just don't live in boxes. i'm rick sanchez. i will be looking for you next to the

or the look forward to talking to you all that technology should work for people. a robot must obey the orders given by human beings accept. we're so shorter to conflict with the 1st law show alignment of the patient. we should be very careful about our personal intelligence. the point obviously, is to great trust. rather than see it, the various things with artificial intelligence we have summoning the theme and the

robot most protects this phone existence was alexis, the hello and welcome to cross stock. were all things are considered. i'm peter lavelle . historically, in the west, freedom of speech was deemed a right and not a privilege. it appears. this is no longer the case. this is also the case with the latest iteration of the russian gate hoax. only right speech is allowed. the cross slacking free speech. i'm joined by my guess what.