full members, they became full of members of the brakes. the founding members. so who may be founding fathers of brakes? they have been adamant from the very get go. that breaks is not something that basically breaks is not an enemy to the west. breaks is not an enemy to nato, and the other alliances because it is an alliance of a very different sort. it is not like you, it is not like nature, it has a very different mission statement than that. it is simply an alternative. unwilling alternative that is growing very popular fights, some of our info, the news adults are really sent us. now this a lot of inputs in a just said that if he is allowed to use long range weapons dislike deep inside russia, it wouldn't mean the direct involvement of nate to in the war a freeze for just a week. there is an attempt to substitute concepts because we are not talking about allowing well for meeting the key regime to strike alternative ot it already does

that with the help of drones and other means. but when we are talking about the use of precision weapons, long range, western made weapons, it is a completely different story. the fact is that i have already mentioned this, and any experts will confirm it both in our country and in the west. the ukrainian army is incapable of striking with modern western made long range precision systems . it can only do that by using intelligence from satellites, which ukraine does not have. they get the data only from the you satellites, or from the united states in general from natal satellites. that's the 1st thing. the 2nd and very important thing. maybe the key one is the flight emissions. and these missile systems can, in fact, be inputted only by nato military personnel. ukrainian service men cannot do this. so it's not a question of allowing the ukrainian regime to strike russia with these weapons or not. it is a question of deciding whether or not a native country could be directly involved in the military conflict. if this decision is made,

it will mean nothing else but the direct participation of nato countries. the united states, european countries in the. ready in ukraine, this is the direct participation. and this already, of course, significantly changes the very essence of the very nature of the conflict. it will mean that nato countries, the united states, european countries, are at war with russia. and if that is the case, then having in mind the change in the very essence of this conflict, we will take appropriate decisions based on the threats that will be presented to us. well, the problem with me is that with me anyway, my colleague mike of content will be with you at the top of the as my bids you for a very good the of the 14 or 15 different policies like she was big on, defend the police in minnesota,

she went out with them and i'm talking now. if you don't mind, please sound familiar. why she went out with democrats proving there are always one debate away from removing someone from their office. and republicans hoping to cause the same damage as they did in june. pamela harris and donald trump met for the 1st time on tuesday night. and there's a bade hosted by a b, c. well, the pressure was up surely, or the both parties were quick to declare a winner, but who actually accomplish their goals and how much will it affect the election outcome in november on sky now here's, and this is perspective the the 2020 for presidential debate, which sometimes seemed more negative than i think either candidate wished how

strong some of the major issues americans were hoping for. now, for the democrats, the issue of abortion was expected to be one that they wanted at the forefront. donald trump actually defended his stance on the reverse of roe vs wade, and lindsey davis responded with what summer calling. i think he said the baby will be born and we will decide what to do with the baby. in other words, will execute the baby, and that's why i did that because that predominates because they are radical. the democrats are radical and that each individual state is voting. it's the vote of the people. now it's not tied up in the federal government. there is no state in this country where it is legal to kill a baby after it's born. well, the moderator may have come in with a prepared fact check. but here's what donald trump was referring to. the answer would be delivered. the answer would be kept comfortable. uh. the info would be resuscitated if, if that's what the mother and the family desired. and then

a discussion would ensue between the physicians and the mother. now there is another topic, afghanistan, how my hair is, a struck a truck. but by saying she has the endorsement over 200 republicans, including those who used to work with him. but it seemed donald trump was ready for this and threw it right back at her. i fired most of those people, natural, graciously, they did bad things or a bad job. i fired and they never fired one person dating for anybody having to do with afghanistan in the taliban. in the 13 people who's, who's were just killed viciously and violently killed. and i get to know the parents and the family. they didn't fire, they should have fired all those generals, all those top people because that was one of the most incompetent li, handled situations anybody has ever seen. not speaking of afghanistan an hour later, the moderators as comma here's, if she feels,

any responsibility for how the withdrawal played out. well, i will tell you, i agreed with president, finds decision to pull out of afghanistan for presidents. said they would and go by and it as well. other topics they were hoping not to cover. they did because following the last 24 hour news cycle, the focus on a town in ohio called springfield. now this is just a small town of only $60000.00 residents with one 3rd of them being haitian immigrants who the federal government had place there for a. so now the migrants had committed a multiple, a legal acts as noted to the city council, and yet not much was being done over the last 2 years. when i was until this rumor began circulating our social media that haitians were stealing and killing local pets and waterfowl at the local police department said there is no truth to this rumor. but a recording of a, a police phone call obtained by the federalist, reveals a local resident actually reporting

a group of haitian migrants carrying for geese in springfield, ohio, just 2 weeks ago. so it was about 4 of them. it was 2 main 2, and then how many did they have? uh, each i have one. now the car did say you spotted the haitians. karen mcgee said an intersection between water and water street. and that's the location that does exist in springfield, and it is confirmed and the police report later filed about the incident. but this might not have been an issue except donald j. trump decided to speak on it. of the people on television cleared, my dog was taken and used for food. so maybe you said that it may be, that's a good thing to say for a city manager, i'm not taking this from the same and job was eaten by the people that went there. again, springfield city manager says there's no evidence of that placement of all your help. and those are just some of the top points from the debate. but i want to actually discuss the bigger picture and that's with our panel core as you are now,

as an archie delegate at large, jamal thomas is the political analysts and tom martin, chair of the american pac. thank you so much for joining me. so i wanna start actually with you on this jamal, do you think a single vote was changed or motivated by this debate? it's kind of hard to know. i mean, the reality of it is color hers was effective and they get her points. don't necessarily go up, this is going to change the trunk supporters. whether it changes independence. oh man, it's hard to know of. this is one of those things that you see the holding on to see whether or not there's a trend line. i mean, up until this point though, we know there was a trend line going the way from kamala harris, maybe whatever balance or whatever she was able to get. i would argue more media creation. but it seemed to balance itself out, especially in the background states. if i had to guess so, so there may be a few independents, but i'm not necessarily sure that the change too many minds one way or the other,

to be honest. what's interesting because gloria before we actually talked about the candidates, i would actually talk about the host of the debate, which sunset you should just leave alone. if you're talking about the rest, you're losing the argument except the rest do matter. i'm going to say this get out and i laugh, i'll media colleagues dismiss that hosted the debates. don't matter. they do. do you think david more and lindsey actually treated both candidates fairly and donald trump was actually given almost double the time to speak. what was that because the command of the stage, or because the host wanted him to hoping that he would hang himself with his own words. i think john traverse even more times be intentionally because kamala harris has nothing to say. she has nothing to say about her how she lives in the last 3 and a half years. she has nothing to say about her policy. she has no policy. so by keeping president, trump speaking, they were able to keep her quiet and let's face it. she felt more last night and

she has spoken in 3 and a half years and she's running across it. and i still can't tell you any policy that she has. she did not express herself well last night. it's just a lot of delta. i still don't know where she's getting that money from the $25000.00 and she's willing to give everyone to buy a home. nobody understands. so i do feel that the house do keep president trump engaged in conversation because come out here assess nothing, just that. but that's the thing tom going into this donald trump pretty much suited these hes. we're probably going to be against him. so should have prepared better or did he handle it just like as best as he could? no. and that potentially these 2 hosted, especially the one of them had already just recently compared him to the k k k or his supporters to said donald trump do anything to keep being from being demonized by these host. well no, because of the other day donald trump doesn't like big tag team like come out and hair studs as just one of the ways she started affordable careers or tag gaming.

but i mean, at the end of the day when you're sitting there, you're ready for president united states and you have 3 people trying to get them out and just attack you. it's ridiculous. i mean, they didn't correct her on the order inflation. they didn't correct her a dana stand, they didn't correct her. i think that 98 percent of americans know are a complete and utter failure by the by and the ministration. so i mean, nbc stands for always be communist at this point in time. well, it's everything tomorrow because i can, so you kind of be the middle of the road on the panel today. did you learn anything new about the policies of either candidate? oh, before i get into that part of it, just to push back a little bit on some of those. um, what donald trump is that the whole donald trump, what time to try to what time it is very is, is the points of, at each point, to be honest, you had donald trump, that basically was like, wait a minute, let me age in a pools more time it just so happens that the announcer were willing to give both candidates more time to make their points, whatever those points were,

donald trump just was breaking the rest of it, taking its time for me, taking the time. but they were alternately ration. so we did not to give them even though mikes were cut off, the bikes were immediately cut back, but one, every time each candidate had a particular point to be from the standpoint of should have donald trump in little repair. well yeah, i agree with you that they ask questions in a way that were specific. so let's say the deficit, subtract, for example, or even affect ships where they didn't necessarily back check them all hers even though they was bachelor. donald trump. there are no, but let's be very clear. donald trump should have been but more prepared to this debate and there are multiple times where he couldn't necessarily um, he could make games like a video in the park work model her as a, the world leaders by embarrassed by, you know, this is a woman who hit the back the job i was out of his mind and been out of his mind tomorrow's meeting. they were hiding the back july who was going into the will to

dislike. oh yellow, the events abroad. even the wall figured it was pointing out how basically it was a humiliating experience with the president to be seen in that way. and yet she would take the argument that is donald trump, that's the environment. donald trump had no capability of even pointing something like that out. and there were multiple instances where you could take it a certain level of advantage, but he just didn't take, he seemed like he was flat footed. that would be okay. didn't say i hear missed opportunities. i think it's, it's not the republicans are disappointed. donald truss performance. i think they feel like this was a missed opportunity to but you have to admit there was a lot to throw at him. gloria from that perspective though, a lot of these questions, especially in the chapter about the controversies and the trouble that he's had in the past or that they've tried to make him have in the past yet. we really didn't talk about much about commas. issues. are you surprised that there was not a question or anything about the conversation about how the fact that just 6 weeks ago she was not even in this position or what role she played in the past 3 years

of jo vitus. why should the people trust her when she's basically been lying to him for the past year and now she's in the spot? i'm not surprised because it's who was asking the questions. i s o lived in account of this country. i can tell you this is what happens. the media is told what to say by the government, by congress. and right now ac is, is s and runs that kind of this network. so they basically gave her questions based off of questions to her. and i was going to colorado and she hasn't. uh, president trump did try to, but they did not allow him to go through with it. and they gave her no questions. i mean, has she been to the board or know, has she been to your no, i understand that, but how are you going to change our country in the next 4 years? you've done nothing in 3 and a half years and i think that's a question that should have been asked. i mean, as a mom,

i wouldn't want my children playing outside in front of my home because i don't know how many legal interests are here and i don't know how many criminals are living here. and i have the relatively same area. so i have to wonder why or questions like that. as, as the only answer is, abc news has no interest in having small hers answer us less your glory to your point. i did find it interesting. they talked about how the calmer harris had gone over and she talked really zalinski 3 or 4 times and guess what? she still didn't get peace. there was still a conflict that happened in that region. so that just shows how much of an effective leader she is the broker and piece where she was set with the task responsibility. and when she left, 2 days later is when everything unfolded, gloria tomorrow. tom, i want you to stay right there. because after short break, did you notice donald trump rarely looked at comma harris during the debate, while harris's face, that would have lost her game of poker. what role did body language play? not only with the candidates, but also with the audio,

the move. what else seem real? i just don't have to say power and engagement equals the trail. when so many find themselves will depart. we choose to look for common ground the the the,

the welcome back to perspective. i'm your host guy. now he's, there were several exciting moments regarding body language in the debate. first, when that kenneth initially walked out on stage vice president, come on here is walked over to shake donald trump's hand. well, it looks like trump only intended to go straight to a sodium speaker, podiums comma harris had a miniature podium during the debate on abc against donald trump. the move was requested by harris's team, who was afraid she would look hi me compared to donald trump. the smaller podium would make the candidates look the same size during the tele, vice split screen. now, as noted by actually is, harrison trump have one of the largest high differences amongst presidential nominees in united states history. donald trump, while he's 6 for 3. commer harris,

54. and throughout the debate, donald trump rarely looked in harris's direction. there is lots to analyze in this non verbal communication is happening at the present to the right. so i want to bring back at our panel core as yano are in c delegate at large small thomas political analyst, and tom norton, chair, american pac. okay, so i know we'd love to talk about body language, but in this case it does make a difference. any time after talking about taylor smith's endorsement, i'm going to talk about donald trump not looking in her way. tom to start with you, did all the body language actually matter to either the candidate or the audience? i think it was a little bit less of the body language. i mean, the only part that i can really think of is prep work straight to the camera and continue to try to look like you as president joe. that same look, that made up very popular on the apprentice. come our look like a very kind and saying mad house wise. and that's not something that appeals to

moderate voters. but like, for instance, my wife's a barber. i work in, i work in the sales and have a, have a company helped manage. and one of the things we noticed today and talking to people was it was less of body language in her voice like her voice was very, very squeezes, crazy, very kind of the same thing. and that was what really turn people off. it doesn't matter. the messaging, it's good, i listen to this person for 4 years. i mean there's, there's, there's women who didn't vote for tech cruise because they didn't think his face was trusting enough when you ran for president in 2016. so the body language was there and those 2 aspects, but really a lot of it was the voice was hard to listen to ok. segora. i want you to take your very well known partisan hat off. and i want you to keep being a woman in this situation. you say comma harris had a harder, harder sell to the public. the donald trump had to do just because she was a woman, because not only did she have to be a female,

but she had to also appeal to med and not remind them of any of their ex wives that they tried to run away from as far as quick as possible, i absolutely not as the one in the were all 8 quotes and then absolutely not. i know that she needs to play any kind of a female car. what i did find interesting is her going like this, and it was like a child listening to a story that's not woman. that's a child who is trying to do black for her own incapacity to be able to express or so. and it just look at president trump as if he is an as retainer that has nothing to do with being alone. she acted like a child. what's interesting guy because i know after yard, nobody ever realize that he was in a wheelchair. and because the media hit it for me, they were very nice. and i actually was somewhat insulted by the fact that they came in and change the podium south to try to make them look equal. if this was going to be an issue 2 or 3 weeks ago, why did they not just put them at

a table together sitting there down? i think it's very interesting that you know a few hours before they're changing up tables. i just don't like it. you know, it looks smaller, but let your voice show that you're just as strong as he is. and that was, would have been my advice to the commer harris campaign, i think is a woman that's actually insulting, that they had to actually change the stage just so we could stay in on the same one with a man. but speaking of standing on the same stage, we have taylor swift. i or drew, i know jamal, that is your woman right there. i know that you play her songs every more in your alarm clock, but her endorsement came out not even before as a comma harris and taking her high heels off. and it was a long one. it had her picture of her with a cat. it was already planned. democrats and politicians a like today are just claiming it as if you got the endorsement of jesus christ himself. do you think it's that big of a deal to? oh, just to go back real quick. i don't see the issue with the, the differential in regards to changing the tables and she wants to be balances.

she doesn't want that stuff to come into play. also don't understand the child thing. i don't get better at all. that's. i'm sort of a projective. but the reality of it is it looks like she was trying to frame herself what she. ready is listening to donald trump, i guess she was aware of what it was gonna look like inside spring. oh, that's the tell us what i have to be honest. i don't know why tell us what is relevant to any other to be honest, i don't. i mean, there's a lot of endorsements that took place that i don't quite get. i mean, the idea that the cheney with cheney is all a sudden i. ready know, these are the great statesmen of the democratic party as the malware is supposed to be a specific mission, but the cheney ellis training during the debate. i gotta be honest, i don't want to get federal. i don't think these endorsements, but the deals with thing may have some level of legs in regards to maybe a younger demographic. maybe young women who listen to taylor swift.

i mean, is, was paula here is already going to get a young. ready graphic probably, is this going to be overly significant? you see, i don't know that it was sweetheart demographic, but the political space, the way the resume is we here in doors has all of the time. and i don't think anybody shot cuz i remember the music or hollywood will endorse a democrat. i mean, that's nothing new to it. we see that i think there's more of a surprise when they come out endorsing republican. that's where people go. wait a minute, really. you're, you're bucking. yeah. the system on this and what kind of retribution are you going to expect for that being said, tom, there's always about a strategy. and just like i ask for you to take off her hat as a part of the night interest, put it back on cuz she's now back to being the transporter. we know she is, i'm gonna ask you to look at this from a strategic point of view. do you think that democrats had a plan because they 1st held the 1st debate before the convention that is never

been done before? and it's obvious knowing that there was going to have to be some sort of dramatic things that would happen to get you to buy them out that they did that. and so publicly they did that so that the public did say that they pushed the candidate off off the top of the ticket and he was of losing cause. and they knew that from down down balance. and then now we have this new debate and the timing of it, like you said, donald trump, jamal pointed out the donald trump was starting to regain his momentum. all of a sudden, 2 weeks later, we have this debate and you put the shiny new penny out and public knowing that he can be triggered that he can be that people can't get into his head. so that we have the 2nd debate. and it obviously regard, sometimes you performed not only we're going to taylor swift endorsement, you're going to be praise by the media. do you think this was actually a long term plan that was set into place? months ago? i absolutely do. i mean, they come out was trying to get trapped to earlier to be, to walk down. and i'm an agent before the convention if you recall. and he had to

wait until there are not many i get, the democrats were like, well, was it? we're gonna have to be done before august because what if she fails miserably now she didn't bear miserably, but she didn't gain any points anywhere. i. in fact, she interrupted donald trump more than he interrupted her. healy interrupted her twice towards the tale when she attempted it $5.00 to $6.00 different times throughout the debate. so they're all screaming that trump was inappropriate with how many times she tried to interrupt. and she also never answered any questions. she talked in parameters of those specific plans. so i, i guaranteed that strategy of a democratic party because this isn't going to move the following is going to start shifting back to work for right now. in order to be donald trump, the democrat has to have a 5 point we and they don't have anywhere. they're, they're running way under water without a 5 point lead right now. donald trump low in the presidency, every single swing said, if it's within 5 points, is going to win it. he has never been in a tight race and certainly so you mark my words, october, surprise,

the democratic party will be jo by him, either dying or resigned. they're either gonna take him out or he's gonna resign. rob is to give her another bomb by active by sometime in october, or in order for her to get an additional bob to try to take him out. this is an extreme hardy, that no water represents democracy whatsoever. they don't care about the rates, are the wealth of the people of voting. if they did, they could have done it online voting convention or the where the people have the ability to select the how many of the democratic party they could have done that before. the convention, but they didn't want to do that. they wanted the most control candidate that the powers can be, can tell what to do. okay, that's a very bold protection. i'm going to hold your fire to that. i hope it doesn't happen. let me just go and state, i hope not. i never want to see anything negative happen to any family. that being said, at one question, i'm gonna ask each one of you, do you for say, another presidential debate happening? we know there's a b p one. well the do another president, yes or no. gloria is big. okay,

let's go tomorrow. um i know from all of the issues of the one i'll say no. okay. well donald trump is basically said he's not interested in one bothers after the success of this once he's or other? no. okay, so no. okay. gloria back to you. do you have your answer? yes or no? florida. okay, i will go for this job. oh yes, i don't think there be another one. do i think so? yes, i think there will be a number today. yes, i do. and tom, yes or no. and does it matter who the, the, the host of the debate is, does he just need to do it regardless? he is going to be a yes and i think that he's going to so are you already started demanding that he's open to a remaster waiter last night and i guarantee you what's gonna happen is a joint moderator. where is that with handicap blowing in the buffers? going up down the bowling alley like she had because she couldn't defend herself because she didn't need to. the moderators took care of it for her. well,

and that's exactly how i think we should in the panel. thank you so much for joining me, corps yano, jamal thomas and tom norton. you know, nobody likes a day after quarterback, but i think even trump would say there were some missed opportunities. and at times it seemed as though comma harris was being successful at bathing her opponent. now from a strategy standpoint, comma harris would say something remotely last night, substitive. and even chad on this ended job or a bar, which guaranteed that trump would respond would not respond with something substitive in response. then when he was asked a question, he would go back to something else that had been said earlier. so we never got into any details about the administration's accomplishments under him. donald trump missed the simple message. are you better off than you were 4 years ago? more importantly, is the world better off than it was 4 years ago. and if we're all being honest,

i think we already know the answer. but hey, that's just my perspective. i'm sky now, he's the, there's no end in sight over how you're going to continue to destroy the earth. is the case of the med, most of the people i've tried to go to the gym, but i'm certainly not ready to fight russia. this is also absurd. this is the 3rd world lunacy re washington press for. so the funder line likes to say, we have the tools while we just start with stability and business deals to be living on that we have very close propaganda. you know, a price here in new york. i think we don't know the aftermath. any time that you're not allowed to ask questions, you should ask all of the questions. some more questions ask a better. the answer is, will be the,

the sort of question of allowing the premium, the machine's display expression with these weapons. it is a question of you deciding whether or not a native country could be directly involved in the military conflict. a lot of it puts in one's nato, against the allowed key of to use high precision, long range weapons against russia in the war. the court where this got down to the police forward medicine becomes the latest victim of nature as russian products that, as the check engine revealing, has happened at the destruction of the node stream 5 line. go from the way we feel about it, whoever they did, they did a good job and we now know that the americans had advanced knowledge of it.