of the, the, the not a question of allowing the opinion regime to strike russia with these weapons or not. it is a question of deciding whether or not a native country can be directly involved in the military conflict. the russian president award is a little worse to allow ukraine to use the weapons against russia and changes the folks of the common thing. and most of will respond well. so i can go home to home as soon as possible, giving us your thoughts. we don't want to hear the welcome mark is full on the us that we have some dates of iron mountain over the us, possibly giving the green light. queen, queen, select russian thursday, long rigs, weapons. and the vision to is, is exposed to rushes,

f s b reveals the details from its diplomatic mission to a coal. what am i 6 reviving? polls in the name of quote, destabilizing the world policy. a big switch, the wife problem a lot. so this is the, my name's brought some of in 30 minutes of news i'm use start now what i'll type sort of this, our valued inputs. an outline is a west and involvement and you've been saying may to is pushing the comfort to a new phase. and russia will be forced to realign the process there is an attempt to substitute concepts because we are not talking about allowing or forbidding the coverage him to strike our territory. it already does that with the help of drones and other means. but when we are talking about the use

of precision weapons, long range, western made weapons, it is a completely different story. the fact is that i have already mentioned this in any experts will confirm it both in our country and in the west. ukrainian army is incapable of striking with modern west and made long range precision systems. and it can only do that by using intelligence from satellites, which ukraine does not have. they get the data only from you satellites, or from the united states, in general, from now to satellites. that's the 1st thing. the 2nd and very important thing, maybe the key one is that the flight emissions. and these missile systems can, in fact, be inputted only by nato military personnel. ukrainian service men cannot do this. so it's not a question of allowing the ukrainian regime to strike russia with these weapons or not. it is a question of deciding whether or not the nato country could be directly involved in the military conflict. if this decision is made, it will mean nothing else but the direct participation of nato countries, the united states, european countries in the water and ukraine. this is their direct participation,

and this already, of course, significantly changes in the very essence, the very nature of the conflict. it will mean that the nato countries of the united states, european countries are at the war with russia. and if that is the case, then having in mind the change in the very essence of this conflict, we will take appropriate decisions based on the threats that will be presented to us by us. again, mount moral this to in the mean out in the few days on the scene, cause one of charlotte davinsky saw it. so it's good to see you saw it and put things laid out by opus on pocket. yeah, that's why. so what we've had this week is the us secretary of state down to the blinking, the u. k. 4 and secretaries. david law, me, they were new cray meeting low to me is a lie in ski. and it was a suggestion, we were going to get huge announcements that the countries were going to prove the use of long range missiles being used against russia buying ukraine not didn't come . of course, we are now hearing that bite and job i didn't is actually working on this and we

are expecting potentially there could be an announcement if not today, then in the next few weeks. and this being to shoot you out a chatter in the west and press about long range weapons, why ukraine should have access to use them to be able to strike these been to russian territory. but then again, we saw on the brink and had to poland, pretty much straight off of that visit. and while he was back, he was meeting with the polish foreign minister. 2, and the polish foreign minister was very clever and low, but it wants its weapons to be used as will range weapons in to russia. fully suppose it was based on the blinking was asked again, did he support this? and he kind of viewed around the topic yet again, not giving an explicit onset, but while we had the polish foreign minister say yes, we will. these weapons to be used in russia. there was huge concern coming from other quarters in poland. politicians saying, look, hey,

if we start approving use of this, we are really escalating this conflict. this is something we don't want. and they've been sounding the alarm of such a crazy suggestions. you can go home, go home as soon as possible. get last year to us. we don't want you here. we don't want we don't want to least be dying for your wars. while charlotte was quite a reaction, there isn't a, it's a we have any of the reactions from the rest of europe. yeah. what we've got poland and the u. k. and possibly the us saying, oh, we might use these long range weapons of a people are deciding to, to roll back up. based on the rectory we've just heard from the chancellor of

germany, olaf schultz who is now becoming the biggest advocate for that being near peace negotiations and saying for those to take place russia has to be at the table. i mean, that's a very different situation to where we were just a couple of months ago and saying that, you know, everything must be done to find a way to end this conflict peacefully. now we know that hungry and nothing you were paying country has always been very concerned about the way the west, the u, the u. k. and the us feeling phones been the ukraine crisis and sending weapons and it sounded like the voice of reasons, right? this conflict in the you and we know that recently evict open to this big one around the world. he went to china and he went to craig and he came to russia. he went to the us with the idea of formulating some way of getting the may knocked his back to the ghost writing table or not. that's what he was the over the were beeped

and criticized from all corners of the u, including in germany. but he's not taking credit for the fact that the germans, that c t plum to the bottom, negotiations being the only way forward are actually now beginning to buy some fruit. and so he is taking respect, spilling seems like, you know, finally we've got some cool heads who are now understanding what hungry has been saying on. yeah, indeed, very interesting. how many americans are there had anything to say? well, as i mentioned earlier, possibly the us could approve the use of long range weapons to be used inside russia. and there is a distinction some report saying that would be american weapons of the report suggesting that the americans would approve the u. k. in poland. another country is using that weapons and they wouldn't have an issue with it. how that turns that we don't know, but we do know that the british prime minister keeps dolman is in washington state . we've talked to buy it in. and if you read the price, these are in a charm offense, if not trauma offensive,

is to bring by didn't room to this idea that those long range weapons need to be used by ukraine against russia. just to be clear, this is pushing weapons to be able to reach like attack comes back to google to 60 miles into russian tire. she's a pretty deep and they could have pretty serious consequences. now, at the same time, there's also reports that bite, and it's really cautious and he's cautious because they're a senior. what types officials, what urging against this, they understand that if america gives the green light to years be suits, weapons against russia. given what we heard from president preaching, saying about how most go respond is really could see this conflict escalate from being something between ukraine and russia to something that could be an awful lot larger. and we have had mornings of best phone very long time. but, but then this will distractions that by 2, it's to wait till the new next un general assembly. so we really have to wait to

see where the us lands on this. but what's interesting is we now hearing from those who that if long range weapons who use this could be a real game changer. but just a week ago we heard from the us, secretary of defense saying probably won't change quite much. but some of this is where the upside we set all along the to there's, there's no, no one capability that will in and of itself, be decisive in this campaign. you know, we've had this discussion about tags. we had this discussion about the about other capabilities and, and each time we point out that it's not just one thing, it's a combination of, of capabilities and how you're going to great those capabilities to achieve objectives. so i don't believe that one specific technology is going to be decisive . so creating 2 different points on the. so what's interesting is we've also now

had a clear understanding of what donald trump's position is on this. if he won the presidential election in november, he was talking at the presidential debate of the day and he basically said that he would approve the territories that have food to, to join the russian federation since 2014. so that's probably me on the 4 territories that were incorporated more recently would be able to stay you russian territories. he's also suggested by his vice president, a tickets whole, the defense that ukraine would remain neutral. it wouldn't join nature. these are all the points of pressure as both of time and time again and asked for an he's saying that he just wants to, we'll just stall. but i think it's quite clear that he's concerned about the american taxpayer who's funded this war to the tune of hundreds of billions of dollars and have little if nothing to shows about. yeah, and the shots and data side of things do change quickly. we appreciate you on

parking or about for us odd seats shut up to about to be thanks again. the the we have this also speak with a pair of guess about the potential for the comfort to is 5 and the consequences for a head on by so between busha and then a 2 block attacking rush. it was a long range based on the webpage, which technically, which is right would be managed and programmed by what, by wisdom, but nature soldiers, as i think a step which is yeah, the final one, edward should be the russians were, the russians will react with what they didn't do until now. i think the west is already active part of the war for a long time because from international law. and we have this from the exports of german from this type of the german problem and even sharing intelligence data operate of data and tells data is already participation of the war. you were kind of rewarding at regarding international law. this is a hopeless try to um, to,

to escalate this. but anyway, they all the windows because they pushed forward the europeans business. these are the biggest uh, economic competitors in the world. so us states may, can only win by escalating this uh, this thing because the, the problems will be in europe as they say. and the other question sort of the u. s . really own plans of the decisions are made in washington. so, um, what i see is that they have trying to bring weapons. um, what i have heard from the conversation is that also by now the as no re willingness, no decision made on attacking russian missiles or christmas on ukraine territory. sikowski, publish it publicly as um, supporting that. but he said there is no decision made and as far as i understand, this is nothing which could happen quickly because as he said, this will be step in the war. if we close here, regardless, nato, we see west um,

economies that are uh, partly very degenerated. so they cannot cope with any war any more. the society sold allow war any more. and if you see at the elections that lady in germany, but also in france, where am i call and just neglects whatever has been, the people have been voted for the people angry. they're furious and beast leads that are still remaining in power and acting in the hospital. i seem to act in behalf of the us. they are um, they are very close to be removed. and the us is playing a big, big glass here because they need the european puppets to have a grip on the raising continental because the rest of the you'll get raising content in is connected to the brakes and it is off. so when they use everything here, then it's the nightmare for, for the us. and i think the us, uh,

businessman realistic enough to say no, don't stop this year. this s s s, this is the cost to put it as something so that try to confuse rash up to the left and so on. i think the decisions on russia and decide about the actual do russian miss out on the, on your train. but it's the questions about how long registrar weapons western what is firing into the only thing that scares me very much. is that blinking and his uh, um, bridges, counter pod were just in your brain and these people, when the stop for a minute starts go to ukraine. that has been made some very severe decisions and looking at the faces of these people that were not decisions like we, we step back and we withdraw. and we a, we, we say we, we lost this thing, this scares me pretty much. so if they do this, nato is in big trouble because i, for my person, think nato is not able to uh,

to hold or to to withstand some, some hot war in europe. the same as other set this bones on cost line of international law that screwed into the russian and for movies, for this event, as a revelation surface of the u. k. for an office on a co, but didn't tell him, i think, emissions the british embassy has gone far beyond the limits outlined by the vienna conventions. the most important thing is that we are talking not only about the formal side of the issue and the inconsistency of the declared activities, but about subversive actions aimed at harming all people. but as off the rushes fs, the reveal the, the u. k. foreign office has, as i said, on quote, these stabilizing the world on trying to so difficult inside russia, on the diplomatic cover, to creating new offices under the wider bremo of the m,

i 6 o the senior part. so i'm one of the guys, you have exclusive details, a political department. so sections of the embassies are traditionally havens for spies as these deposit really deep limits, kind of test or identify those are the employees or agents of british intelligence. the more in ukraine has turned upside down. many rules of diplomacy, a robust simpler, some of those changes began before these conflicts. and among those to one to this rule, the moves no, was competing for an officer. then you structure before an office is nothing above the coordination center for this truck through the civilization of the wallet situation by dragging all these awards countries into a global conflict. please intelligence agents, posing as diplomats deeds, what they quote, the current conditions. the medicine mingled and robert didn't dive with friend g

russians. invited them to private, even secret tools behind the embassies tool and impenetrable rules. now, tons of tough. last, many russians want anything to do with british intelligence. because with different vend london's priorities, a well illustrated by semi informal events, surprise were british diplomats build purchase with a local flock. one such event in russia took place in may. we're talking about the reception on the occasion of the birth date of the british and besser to russia. nigel casey, those among the seasons. once in the orbit of the british embassy and the colors, think of expert at the most co carnegie center because bunch of them took off editor in chief and ceo of news. i've used them. i guess you have that. and then you'd see must see on the german all the world union of old delivers. the graduates of georgetown university in washington are still rotating the least of new commerce

who showed up at case his birthday party is interesting among those invited work. i think something about board managing partner of the law firm about point and partners. alexander does the chairman of the board executive director of the yelton center, the meet a good evening jeweler, entrepreneur, in the world mister case. it either continues to look for alternative ways to implement the interest of great britain in russia, or avoids public meetings with real actors. of this work is quite difficult to believe that the new color of soft power is the children of russian actors, jewelers journalists for an agents and old delivers. jessica could davenport, for example, 2 rated so called activists now and he's hi, this is payroll. she met regularly with id, poof, and media representatives such as newburgh cuz we have a paid for by the west jeep who's in the activities, leaving on british rods as the government and use paid for by the foreign office.

jessica's passion, though, was reported the pushing migration on russia. she often met with the lawyers and activist. they'll be migrant rights and freedoms even at the expense of russian citizens. as the deadline expulsion noon, it is with them that you will denies the 5, the meetings, russian intelligences or shall shed with the press a number of foreign office files, and then deceptive, not to be perused by the public. they are bad, but the eastern european then central asian director is of the bridge, the fall adult facies upsides you may for them. i 6 wing dedicated to everything and the russian, the e e. c, a, d, is integrated with d, v i s department 5. the close we are the part of the f, c,

d o that focuses on defense and act as the interface between the f c d o for an office and the ministry of defense. we provide political, military expertise to parts of the government, dealing with military operations ago. literally spies spreads across departments dedicated to disseminating breeding's propaganda. world was with a focus on ukrainian propaganda. how does but add more be add ons, ring to oh, and basses, deputy director of government information campaigns, a plethora of departments dedicated to you creative negotiations and quote, nation and initiatives. it's almost like ukraine, the eas paul, to run by the foreign office, or even kids has a negotiations department. and the p is the brits doing that for them. that's even an escalation department headed by simon fed wherever. and don springs austin

mitchell, presumably intended to analyze how far let that could push the credit and conflicts before new hill go head start reading down on london. that's we see this particular group overlook, but we can what's, what's due really spies expelled from russia have to do with these diploma. this go with the deep limits and codes that we have now it's tripped over the accreditation . we'll probably get positions in the directorate as well. many of the departments, something new case, new ministry of propaganda has it, but really spies expelled from russia. d. c, a. d. was reformed into that. it's covered state by most of the harris who to the student in most school is diplomats, james b a who heads the media manipulation department spent suited of in russia and likes

it. so my, such that even got married it most school mach diamond to on. so, so i, the russian sanctions analysis and much more he's and the average bike loved to keep fits during his time. and most school, christopher joyce last didn't get much time to enjoy the russian capital he was booted, daphne a 2 months off to his arrival. your legend, he likes it in russia, su much even shed some tears, as he was off to leave the country after which he became w. d. head of russian policy department. these files reveal just how vested as involved with me is in the ukrainian conflicts, complex of departments, costing of for to looking round the clock to keep the role that they help stop doing new benefits at ease at home. and graduates of the most prestigious

candidates academy. and the was the breezy shabba sea in moscow. more, i guess the of archie, the device of possible american war crimes committed in iraq. i'm, after i saw, has been reduced by us news outlets. and the details of the bill of the us military justice system rarely laid down little with over 65 percent on the allegations dismissed by us investigators over now. so all these shapers with more the allegations of war crimes, the kind that stain a nation. well, that's how an in depth investigation by renown us publish, or the new yorker describe what it discovered while investigating 781 cases of alleged war crimes. when the us military. that's not what's most shocking about the investigation. and that's 65 percent of the allegations were dismissed by us investigators and only $151.00 cases. the investigators actually find against the

us military. and even then the punishments hardly matched the crimes. the de, somebody's makes it possible for the 1st time to see hundreds of allegations of all crimes, the kind that stain a nation in one place along with the findings of investigations and the results of prosecutions. the picture that emerges is disheartening. the majority of allegations listed in the database was suddenly dismissed by investigators. those which ones we usually dealt with later, bike amount is and the justice system that can be debt for rental to defendants and disbelieving a victims. but we're publishing is not a complete record of the atrocities committed by the military since $911.00. it would be impossible to know the old age has its own story, but many stopped. and in the same way with a her wrist. the guy perpetrated by members of the ministry which was then punished likely, or not to sol. so what do we know about the 151 case where action was eventually

terry gets? well, it seems obvious the for the past 20 years, the pentagon has been concealing that there are any investigations at all. and it's always thanks to independent investigators and witness statements that we know anything about the dark underbelly of the us, ministry's crimes interact and afghanistan. one of the most infamous b, a has visa massacre interact on november the 19th, 2005 marines in the dfcs killed 25 civilians including men, women, and children, the beginnings holiday, didn't i. e d attack on the marine's calm voice, that laughter. one of the squad mates dead, marines shots the civilians dead on the street. and then 3 nearby homes and one house of mother and full of had children were killed in a bed in another house, a full year old boy was shot apparently at close range. well, it turns out that the senior us officers who were aware of the killings fail to investigate him for several months. that's until

a video recording of the aftermath was the to the press. eventually after 3 separate investigations into the, into the for marines were indeed charged with murder and 4 officers were charged for reporting failures for obstructing justice, but only one of the marines present that fateful night staff sergeant frank woodridge was convicted of any crime and only a free pleaded guilty to a single account of beverly diction of judy. astounding. the we'll treat syrup no time in prison. i sadly had data wasn't an isolated incident on april, the 15th, 2000 and the full marines array to the house and my mood. yeah. and captured to men early. how about a korean? until he made henry what allegedly attempting to flee in a white call a marine, a 2nd life attendant, then allegedly directed them to perform their own, such off the call. as they was searching, he shot them dead. the 2nd left tenant told investigators that he shot kareem and hun, jeez, roughly 6 times in order to send them a message to other rockies. now,

according to the investigation into the murders of these 2 men, a hand written cardboard sign was left on the car with the marines. you motto, no better friend, no worse enemy. the young officer responsible was charged with 2 counts of premeditated murder. hey, but surprised surprise. the charges were later dropped, interestingly, and 2010 to kill around for the us house of representatives. it seems executing civilians as no bar to a political career in the us. but what's probably most disturb is the number of cases of violence against children from the killing of 3 death, teenagers hurting capital. so the shooting of a 13 year old girl gathering beans. there's a disturbing trend of acquittal and non prosecution. on february, the 18th, 2004, and i'll be sergeant open funds. the village is now out, buffy getting one and wounding to others. the sergeant allegedly fired only civilians as they tried to flee in the area where

a roadside bomb it just exploded. the sergeant shots, a 13 year old go and it's a algebra worry. and they had killing up the also shot. your boy's mother and sister mosley 6th, 2007 and all the stuff sergeant reporting killed 2 teenage brothers and asked set up an order the killing of a 3rd boy. made an advice carried out to me with deaf, unarmed, and hurting capital when they were killed. well, it doesn't, and there the execution of hand cough detainees, the certification of prisoners. the list is as shocking as it is disturbing, with a lack of justice for those that suffered and died is equally shocking. i find that the wounds inflicted to a 15 year old local, national and the death of a 6 year old local, national on about 70 to september 2005 at o 815 or a direct result of the escalation of force by private 1st class a gun of a c team, 2nd squad of the brigade, special troops, battalion,

military police platoon. private 1st class, acted in accordance with the rules of engagement and the units use of force matrix . i recommend that no discipline reaction be taken. private 1st class understands the rules of engagement and acted accordingly with the situation he was placed in based on the documents that never reach the course. and only considering cases that were aware of the us apologies, ignored. more than 75 abuse cases, 64 solvece. i'm an astounding 476 murder. i must murder cases. finally, 10 cases of rape. meanwhile, the men century, responsible for the legal war and the rack. that's form or vice president dick cheney. he has recently resurface in the us, in our nation's 248 year history. there's never been an individual who has a greater threat to our republic than donald trump. he tried to steal the last election using lise and violence to keep himself in power after the voters had

rejected him, he can never be trusted with power again as citizens. we each have a duty to put country above partisanship to defend our constitution. that is why i will be casting my vote for vice president cala harris. so as dick cheney seems to have found his voice in defense of come out of harris, it seems that the voiceless victims of the us military will remain for gun and other victims, not only of the brutality of the u. s. army, but also of a system determined to ensure their cries for justice will never be heard. while that comes up, this is i always good to have a company direct impact fees up next is rick sanchez, will be back in 30 minutes. the .