the, the united states respects and champions freedom expressions, but we will not stand by as r, t and other actors carry a corporate activities in support of russia's nefarious activities. far to slap with more sanctions and the president of act of censorship from the u. s. south washington moves the silence voices that challenge the mainstream. doris, you've asked the question for matt, for months and months about the global south and why there's not more support for ukraine is because of the broad scope and reach of r t 4 will indeed have global reaction to that. plus the russian foreign ministry reacts to the latest measures against our channel, calling them the curious form the persecution. this is no longer about the

sanctions, and it has not been about sanctions for a long time. it is not about ukraine, but only about one thing about maintaining its own american dominance. if the decision to lift the restrictions these indeed taken a will be taken me and that from this and i've been told they take countries begin, a direct spoil with russia. russia is out in boston or to the united nations moreland about the conflicts in ukraine could end up on a higher lead, different skill set, the fun on the long range weapons use against rushes, lifted. some western politicians also question the wisdom of the news was another class. it was called a d 7, and they wouldn't let anybody else and put that trap. toby's head with the model for india as foreign ministry states, the rise of the bricks proofing of states. as a consequence of the close, the shop structures of the west, the,

this is our t international coming live from russia's capital city. let's get into our top story this summer that freedom of speech has been dealt another blow and we're involved. washington has slumped. the fresh round of sanctions on our t, claiming the channels global broadcasts are spreading dangerous north. it's, this is what the us secretary of state have to say on the apartment threat posed by us. russian represent this information to subvert and polarized screen of societies extends to every part of the world and response. today, the united states, united kingdom and canada, are launching a launching a joints diplomatic campaign to rally allies and partners around the world to join us in addressing the threat posed by r, t, and other machinery of russian. this information and corporate influence party also secretly runs the online platform african stream across

a wide range of social media platforms. now, according to the others, website, african stream is and i quote, a pan african digital media organization based exclusively on social media platforms. focusing on giving a voice to all africans, both at home and abroad. in reality, the only voice it gives is the kremlin propagandist. the united states respects and champions, freedom of expression, even when it comes to media outlets that winning we spread government propaganda and will continue to lead the world in defending and promoting media freedom. but we will not stand by as r, t and other actors carry out corporate activities in support of rushes. nefarious activities are correspondent, shape, always joints. we know, and the live in the studio is a talk more through this shape r t, again being fixated upon by washington. the legacy media hand in hand that appears

. and the accusations come just weeks out from the us selection we've been done in this road before it, people will recall russia, gate at water. we choose the best type. well, it's essentially more of the same unit uh, very light on the actual evidence, very heavy on allegation at these very tenuous links, the corner data center. again, of course, remember 2016, a hillary clinton need an excuse for losing the election in russia were conveniently annoying. to those that a reason it's subsequently turned out, there was no evidence whatsoever. the hunter, bye, and a lot of people comfortable member this. and of course there's a sense of desperation. now that as the election approaches that come out of harris may need an excuse as hillary did. so that could be part of the reason that this is being deployed yet again. uh, but interestingly, uh, there's also been allegations of, you know, are keeping too close politically at the kremlin here. and one of the man who

actually came, it was rolled up from the state department to, to make these allegations as a guy called james rubin, a james reuben also suggested that we, in our t here, were responsible for a conference in the global south africa, etc. i am not supporting you find it isn't to do with neutrality. it isn't to do with the traditional relations of russia. it's to do with or t, we're responsible for the lack of support for you. find out interesting. james is a mind. it was part of the team alleging at the too much closeness, politically, from our to he's a man who previously worked for bloomberg. he's of mine who worked as a, as an editor for political. and he was also the spokesman from madeline albright who was in charge of american foreign policy. so due to the rack catastrophe, let's have a listen to what james had said. as you've asked question for matt, for months and months about you know, the global south and why there is not more support for ukraine in this part of the middle east, or that part of latin america or this part of africa. well,

one of the reasons not the only reason, but one of the reasons why so much of the world has not been as fully supportive of ukraine as you would think. they would be given that russia has invaded ukraine and violated little number. one of the international system is because of the broad scope and reach of r t were propaganda. just information and the lies are spread to millions, if not billions of people around the world. so apparently we're much more influential than we thought here in moscow. we are responsible for undermining that basically trillion dollar proxy was our key life che, in response to the earlier accusations coming from washington, essentially, ridiculing them what's being the reaction this time or? yeah, again, uh the or t press office responded in a quite a tongue in cheek way. yeah, i suppose that demonstrates the ludicrous nature of the lightweight allegations. no

evidence just again, as allegations of subterfuge, spice stories and no evidence and nothing that you would present in a court of law. but there was also a response from that belkin who was the deputy editor in chief here at ortiz, who addressed the serious nature of these allegations you in on the side of this. at this point, it is amazing to watch what their paranoid minds will come up with next, when in fact, since almost 20 years, since r t has lost, all we have been doing is our jobs and journal, which is bringing the stories and the voices to the audiences destiny media would not allow. and that is something for which the west an establishment has been trying to get rid of us on since day one. the prove that they are in fact afraid even terrified of a dissenting voice. less their people believe it. and even more so

perhaps they are afraid of this was being heard all around the world in other countries and regions around the planet. because they want to be the only ones to control all the flow of information. the only wants to control all of and they're well, it's too bad for them because r t is not going anywhere. we will continue to run our job and we will continue to find new ways to reach our audiences in every corner of the world. yeah, so some very important points there. this isn't about, you know, a threat to democracy. it's about a challenge to a narrative, which is, you know, centrally created to a client media in the west. of course, we know the history and the intimate nature of the relation between the bbc and m i 6. we know that this has been exposed numerous times operation. mockingbird i'd suggest are you is looked at all a huge ca operation to infiltrate the independent media. united states now

we've also got a grub or of a young gene. oh, you should come here. you see a sorry. yeah, she's a bit of a mouthful korea. she's the white house press secretary spokes person. now as she's as the one, she's a bit of a smirk color. yeah. just the, just so this is quite interesting. she as obviously been told as everyone else as, as america and them was told not to sort of treat this with any kind of humor. and that is a very serious subject. so have a look at her response and watch it for her to attempt to suppress or getting a social media a r t less around freeman state department. we're running out to be here. fly. mean, kind of mocking the administration on sanctioning them at this point. we do not laugh at that, that is very serious and we take that very seriously. okay, so she's, she's a echoing, married garland on his team where they were told this is very serious despite the

fact that was absolutely no evidence whatsoever presented, you know, the key point and show you the russian foreign ministry also responded quite a star. comparison was made without a western attacks and russian media. right? mm hm. uh, i mean marie is the heart of a, is a woman who is very well armed with her vocabulary. she understands exactly what's going on in the west. and she says that this is not just an attack on ortiz, this signifies the lowering of the bar that you know, potentially anybody could be the target of this and not just russian media. it's also about individuals. it's about an attempt to suppress freedom of speech. and to stop people asking inconvenient questions, that's all isn't the issue. it doesn't, you know some sickly. this is no longer about sanctions and it has not been about the sanctions for a long time. this is about persecution in the same way that people were persecuted on the basis of nationality as mr. t. religion. this is what is being done around russia today. and in general, around the russian media, russian public figures,

those people who are ready to really lay down their lives, there will be those people who call things by their names who are not afraid to say the truth. who have gone through haley circulars of pressure sanctions, persecution of all kinds of humiliation insults they do not give in. they do not stand for you, but is not about you crane. but only about one thing about maintaining its own american dominance. the russian media, primarily those that are engaged in broadcasting abroad, show the facts. they are not demonstrating a pro russian position, or they do not work to improve the image of the russian federation. they provide objective information and this objective information reaches different parts of the world. there is not a single example of russia today engaging and propaganda, this information fakes and so on. otherwise, it would all be in court by now. but it isn't. that's why these measures are being taken. so again, she's pointing out the fact that if there was anything that was demonstrated lee illegal or wrong or fake about what we do here in warranty,

this would be all over the west and media. they would have it on the front pages of every platform, every website. but there's nothing. what's your that's delve into those uh, lots of remarks with 3rd gas. joining us live now and always good to see a doctor. so they go, i mean, by your co assistant professor. do you ever see with bama code with a specialist in communication and i'm from apology at good to see you today so that, i mean i'm, let's have a listen. in fact, together at 2, what james reuben, who we've just been laying out, it's his re, met the us department of state's global engagement center coordinator. what he had to say. i want to ask your viewing of it afterwards. that's a big difference than our state funded media. i believe you may know. busy in this building gets to tell anyone that v o a or a fee or are out what to say do are right. they ask us questions and we answer them . that's the difference between a state funded media organization in a democracy and one in an authoritarian government. the leader of

r t is admitted that that's what she does and they do. and we've now given you a norm as examples of how dangerous it is around the world, and i sure hope it meets your definition of something new. yeah, so the u. s. plane is that the way it's state funded media and operates is somehow different to, to global content parts. so what we do is fine, but the rest of you, well, you gotta take our lead. the end of it essentially seems to be what's being talked about. there and yes, you know, eh, this of fights this, um, um, struggle against russia and the rest of the war by us because you know, the power or you who, if just the, yes, 1960 was this stuff spyware, as they said. and that's software was made for mid yet,

and communication and freedoms and so on. so now all the rest of the wars including russia, russia, which is the main part where we, which can come to us, which can be december level of us is doing very well at. busy all over the world are those, you know, a p is very popular in a freak out, especially for example, that's why the us is trying to say that the evolution but against the key and saying that a r t is supported by the government is funded by the government much. ready and so i'm to do the rest them propaganda as to what the, what the invalid. i just put a point to on. not very that, that fairly issue. because if mainstream outlets did their job properly on told

both sides of the story, particularly when it comes to the ukraine conflict, how is that a rough did the issues leading up to that then? maybe our 2 wouldn't be seen as such a potent and threat because we, we want to give both sides. we want to give the box, right. and we want to keep the historical context. i think global side people understand that they don't want to be fed one particular narrative. exactly, but is not only link it to the what in the you can is not the only because uh they want the uh to have the information on the side, the total due by demme eh, about, uh, what is going on in between russia and you can is also because the majority of the population are 7 by the conflict between widths and west chef. so to speak up and out of our most in of the golf course. also in gen, ed,

india and pakistan. but in africa for example, there is a majority of the population and which is a like raising the voice to say that the m, the domain is of u. s. much early in the communication book and all the foods of the world have to be stopped. if not, if it is not stopped, we have to take it because of dish and also the voice of authentic off. for example, that's why data thinking that the washer is using a key for the propaganda. also have the domain is in notice of the words of close it's uh the origin is from the wire in you can book is look of the dot is down to the can i have been there and i talked in enough to ask you a question and you know, these are allegations which are in, on proven we don't have any evidence presented,

which is bizarre. fucking fucking 2016. we kind of seen this movie before we see. and how it ends. there was an investigation back in 2016. it didn't produce any evidence that russia had meddled in the election of donald trump, you know, due back to see something similar like this year, is this all part of this fee for, for the us selection? so yeah, it, it could be, you know, um if, for example, uh uh, they want the democrats canada to be the president. if it seems to be the president, everything is fine because is the what the i make, i'm the mid just want to be. if the wouldn't be the president again, they may say that is because of the introduce of russian made jobs out of t insurance or so it could be again if something wrong up and in the election. there we have tried to find, as we said in france, the bank in the saddle,

some one to build up. this is the part of this and trying to say, that's the easy way is to say that because russia is like, uh, the main opening in the loan wisdom country is that of us, they would say that the issue was because everyone knows everyone knows no rush i is the most power from the country, which can talk to the same level as a us is only the only country in the world's best. so that's why that would fit up . this is before it's of rush out. what with it, what if it were up in, in us and if data, most of the, with the once it up, this is our reading. this is us to people. they would just sit up because there was russian spies, the rest of them. big guy. and what the, what david, what did a really interesting um, insightful analysis, as always from city? i mean by get your co, the university of palmer co associate professor specialist in communications. thank

you so much and thank you. thank you. shingle stating correspondents, fitness through those developments. okay. just some more. uh, related to the theme. all of that, russia, um, the west, moscow was embosser to the u. n. a said, a loving western weapons to stripe deep into russian territory would mean direct more between las coordinator, a sewage switch. the result is due today with a very high degree of probability. we can say that the decision to live restrictions on the use of long range weapons the strikes against russia has long been made in the west. and that was simply witnessing the final stage of its legitimize agents in the eyes of public opinion. actually in relation to key, if this does not change anything for us. in principle, the nazi regime has been hitting on territory for a long time outside the combat zone. staging terrorist attacks that gauge the civilian population on the civilian infrastructure over the country. if the decision to lift the restrictions is indeed taken a will be taken,

it will mean that from this moment until they take countries begin, a direct support with russia. as you know, do you solve such weapons as possible? and the, if you have access to intelligence from a satellite, the united states and the you create itself does not have such an opportunity even close. and the nature of military personnel can program flight emissions bolt missile systems. in fact, we're not talking about the loankey. you have to strike russian surgery with long range weapons, but about making decisions on targets for strikes directly in the west. the fact that the ukranian nationalist will only press the button does not matter. when it comes, as reports spread among western media and politicians, the us and the you k are set to a lot to use western supplies, long range weapons to strike the interruption. however, washington, see this little problem in the last thing you praying target russian cities with their rockets, state departments that will make the u. s. a party to the company. and we have been

very clear that the united states is not going to take part in this war. we're not going to put boots on the ground. we are, however, going to continue to, to equip ukraine so it can defend itself or, and continue to work with a coalition of countries around the world to help you crane defend itself. on a former special assistant to us present roland reagan has been speaking to the going underground program at doug fund with us if the west was waiting, taking a proxy. busy or against russia through you train on holland, when he sees a conflict coming to an end, the phone interview can be seen later today. here in arthur, what do you think then is the next few months as regards the war in your up? i mean what? what do you think should happen? i know you're treated about this, the full, the, the disgraceful, my british prime minister barak joan so much that happened to him. he's been calling for uh, obviously a weapons,

illegal weapons to israel and is also calling for ukrainians more young ukrainians to join up and get killed. arguably in the meat grinder, why the village to the bar as johnson and listens and then skis, ami as well. sorry, so the people who want war should uh, you know, kind of enjoyed the benefits of it. i think the same thing for lindsey graham, for example, us senator favors basically every word that one can imagine. now these are the folks they want to send. other people off, they do extraordinary damage around the world. and i think what's striking about these words is the number of civilians who die in other countries. the united states, u. k. europeans are not the ones paying the price ukrainians are paying the price. russians are paying the price and the long term costs of this. i think you're just devastated. like we need peace there. you know, that doesn't mean i've been very clear. vladimir putin is an aggressor. i think he was wrong in attracting to craig. but we have to recognize allied leaders, united states, europe, nato,

all shares of layman this. they were utterly irresponsible expansion of nato. a. despite the assurances they made to the contrary, despite the knowledge they had for people like birds, that this was an incendiary issue. the issue of extraordinary importance to russia, that essentially we are fighting to destroy russia by sacrificing ukrainian life. so i think it's disgusting. i think it's an awful policy and over the long term, it's a destabilizing policy. we need to get the war over. i think that requires the us and europeans to talk to russia these, to your what kind of a new security structure can be created. ukraine has to be neutral. i think that's the reality here. but protective sovereignty allow it to join the u. b. a. what kind of a system can we create the rush? you can live with the projects, the ukrainians that ends the war. instead of pouring more money into it, more weapons into it and prolonging the fight. we have to be looking for ways to try it in the

mid 19 tensions around the world. paging is called for more dialogue, less threats. china is defense minister said country should result pressing issues through negotiations and not force don't good will. speaking at a high level of security and defense for him, bringing together asian pacific nation john jim total. they are no winners in wars and conflicts, and there is no way out of the obsession with confrontation. the ultimate termination of any conflict is reconciliation. resolving hot issues such as the crane crisis and the israel palestine conflict promoting peace talks for political solutions is the only in the fundamental way out. we got some reaction to this from asian to 1st specialist marco for non this. he believes china could be a game changing mediator in, at global conflicts,

but that would still require both sides to be willing to negotiate. well, china has been playing this role with mediator in other cases. as we remember last year, the historical deal between saudi arabia in ren actually started in, in russia. russia started this, this role and negotiate a been china did recently. the same happened with the 14 by the senior organizations, the set together in the gene. again, they set 1st and moscow then the set and b gene and they made a important agreement. so i think china is really showing by concrete examples how much they are engaged in, in the piece, a tops, but again, you need, would they make a good mediator? do you think? i think so. i mean, they're trying to do that. they did this statement a proposal together with brazil, that was an attempt, it was a real attempt. but again, we need the other side to listen and, and to be able to, uh, reading to discuss at this point,

china is very aware of the us behavior in the, in the nato allies behavior. it's not, it's very similar what they do with rushes, a lot of double standards. i mean, they just things, they accuse china of doing things that they do. this is regarding human rights. this is regarding lots of other issues trying to is already having some, some, a more assertive actions, like for instance, some restrictions for exports of, of so to the community rules, etc. but at the end of the day, again, i mean, right now the most important thing for china and for the whole humanity is this be stocks? it's all new western powers. the view of india is foreign minister when asked about the rise of bricks on the increasingly lengthy membership to forming audits. doors . it was another club, it was called the d 7. and you wouldn't let anybody else into that trap. so we said we'd go home. i don't know,

i'm still struck by how insect killed the not this when. when it's freak about the break says somehow something seems to get under people's skin and you know, and here's an observation, a decent. you know, if there is a d 20. did the d 7 this band has it stopped me think so it still continues. so the d 20 exist? the d. 20 is there, but the d 7 still exists. then why can't the different to be that in the mix also exist. what essentially dr. j sean 3rd is trying to see that this is it leads to call the g 7. that's all we've seen there. oh, so the very fact that one's some the g something was form. it was very exclusive. it did not let any in margin economies of developing countries via far to fit. so what that does is that also give them a lack of understanding, you know, move or section as well, considering that they've been sol snobbish. they've been snotty. i'm very

a lead in that sense and i wouldn't be talking to rick sweet talking that it's going to do. it's about 45 percent of the walls population, about 3600000000 people. it also accounts for about 20 percent of the walls of bill gdc just to the rule. we also saw our bill break security for which was posted, where in the us embassy was way much prevalent. but of course a g. the wall there had some interesting thoughts. old res handleywood says the re shoes of common concern are no longer a couple of i've just seen martin attach a new situation in this context. as i am particularly happy, the countries of the globe has. so how presented us today, it should be just by and just do it without which is real good in the

fundamental principle. all of us are that what you mean? the word is one from the break, just pretty tough majority respect and understanding solid data, equality, openness inclusiveness and consensus remains our guiding light as we deliberate today and many crucial issues. yeah. have again and again, hold focused on you to a not exclusively like the west has all these deals of the bricks is also looked for reforms in a for example, the was by systems and mechanisms how the, i am a for example, is what we've, we've seen the new development band can please, and we're seeing a mass indeed, the rise vision in the last few years and which is by the rules of in talk. so we're going see for example, your way to go out of course. so there are countries within the bricks as well. the

focus on use of new cars and seen bricks across is aiming to achieve a lot more in october, when the summit would actually take place. and that's that we're expecting that lots how the early we can use a shipping off for now. i'll be back in 13 with all your updates. do hope you can try me back. this is 247 r t introduction the the .