mazda of never be stop, because the mazda of continents must be great. she will only be great on the shore, does all of us sons and daughters on by the set. all right, so now click on the goodwill console, and let us confess, about underground east. the mazda content, the, the size, i think this is definitely a declaration of information war. if every media corporation head does not understand that tomorrow, as blinking said, if you are not at the table, you are on the menu that tomorrow any corporation can be on the menu. it will be too late. last, go accuse this washington of a media terrorist attack following the latest measures taken against our channel by us authorities, calling them the purest form of persecution. the united states respects and

champions freedom expression, but we will not stand by as r, t and other actors carry a corporate activities in support of russia's various activities for what mr. blinking isn't saying is that the sanctions are an unprecedented octave censorship with washington. failing to provide evidence, silver based networks and legit folsom. you've asked question for matt, for months and months about the global south and why there is not more support for ukraine. it's because of the broad scope and reach of r t. if the decision to lift the restrictions is indeed taking a will be taken, it will mean that from this moment on, they take countries begin a direct support with russia, bosco's, and bosses or to the un warden's, the ukraine conflict could end up on an entirely different scale that had found a long range weapons use against brushes, lifted question politicians also question what good could come from the china

accuse of germany, of jeopardizing security as berlin's navy vessels. and through the sensitive taiwan straits, ignoring visions, protest and long timeframes of jurisdiction over the area the across the globe around the clock. this is our teacher national hello, welcome to the news our russia. sloane the us track, done on our t with most goes deputy for administer saving the coming response will make washington think twice about any further hostile action. then it says the ministry spokeswoman label the latest developments. a declaration of information war. the shipping of ac is the degree of aggression with which all this was moist is off the scale. i think this is definitely a declaration of information war. it went on behind the scenes through the

sanctions policy, but there was no declination that the russian media would now be open while you attacked the russian lines. your caused heart burned in the west. jealousy envy, of course, because they could not compete. and when they say that it's because russia 2 days doing something wrong in the united states, if it violated at least one american law. if at least one fake was a sign of some kind of global information campaign that russia, today's conducting on the territory of the united states of america. if even one russia today correspondence had engaged in illegal activities and the american court of some states, or maybe even a plan, american court would have conducted some kind of investigation long ago. a verdict would have been carried out. but there is nothing to show this suggest the journalist all over the world should now understand that tomorrow this will be done to them. therefore, if the media community does not unite now, if every media corporation head does not understand the tomorrow, as lincoln said, if you are not at the table, you are on the menu that tomorrow any corporation can be on the menu. if you'd be too late to move you to let's go through what those remarks are in response to.

it's in response to washington swapping afresh. road of sanctions on our teeth. cleaning the this troubles global broadcast or screwing dangerous narrative at this is what the us secretary of state have to say on the a part and fed posed by us a russian reputation. this information to subvert and polarize freeing open societies, extends to every part of the world. in response today the united states, united kingdom and canada, are launching a launching a joints diplomatic campaign to rally allies and partners around the world to join us in addressing this web post by r t and other machinery of russian just information and corporate influence party also secretly runs the online platform african stream across a wide range social media platforms. now, according to the of this website, african stream is and i quote, a pan african digital media organization based exclusively on social media

platforms. focusing on giving a voice to all africans, both at home and abroad. in reality, the only voice it gives is the kremlin propagandist. the united states respects and champions, freedom of expression, even when it comes to media outlets that winning we spread government propaganda and will continue to lead the world in defending and promoting media freedom. but we will not stand by as r, t and other actors carry out corporate activities in support of russia's nefarious activities have relied on actual evidence. very heavy on allegation at these very tenuous links the corner data center. again, of course, remember 2016 uh hillary clinton need an excuse for losing the election in russia were conveniently annoying to those that a reason. it's subsequently turned out there was no evidence whatsoever the hunter, bye, and allow people to come for a member of this. and of course, there's a sense of desperation now that as the election approaches that come out of harris

may need an excuse as hillary did. so that could be part of the reason that this is being deployed yet again. uh, but interestingly uh, there's also been obligations of, you know, uh, already being too close politically at the kremlin here. and one of the man who actually came, it was rolled up from the state department to, to make these allegations as a guy called james reuben, a james room. and also suggested that we, in our t here, were responsible for countries in the global south africa, etc. and not support and you find it is to do with neutrality. it isn't to do with the traditional relationship with russia. it's to do with or to we're responsible for the lack of support for you. find, let's have a listen to what james had say. you've asked question for matt, for months and months about you know, the global south and why there's not more support for ukraine in this part of the middle east or that part of latin america or this part of africa. well, one of the reasons not the only reason,

but one of the reasons why so much of the world has not been as fully supportive of ukraine as you would think. they would be given that russia has invaded ukraine and violated real number one of the international system is because of the broad scope and reach of r t, where propaganda does information and allies are spread to millions, if not billions of people around the world. so apparently were much more influential than we thought here in moscow. we are responsible for undermining that basically trillion dollar a proxy was our t laugh che, in response to the earlier accusations coming from washington, essentially, ridiculing them what's being the reaction this time or? yeah, again, uh the or t press office responded in a quite a tongue in cheek way. yeah, i suppose that demonstrates the ludicrous nature of the lightweight allegations. know evidence just again, as allegations of subterfuge,

spice stories and no evidence, nothing that you present in a court of law. and i know interesting the young pierre of she was also asked about this at, there's obviously being a dick touch, sent out among all of the political elite in, in washington. take this very seriously and don't fall into the top of actually a breaking into a grin. and when you're talking about this ridiculous allegations, that's all the look at miss young pierre and just watch for her. the suppression of a gigabyte there. say he has given that one social media as a r t less run for you in the state department head. we're running out to be here, fly administration on sanctioning them at this point. we do not laugh at that. that is very serious. and we take that very seriously. is obviously been, uh you know, the, the russians in front of make us laugh about this to try to highlight the fact that this is all quite ridiculous. so under no circumstances are you to take their joke,

don't, don't laugh at their jokes is the worst possible thing you can do. but there was also a response from that belkin who was the deputy editor in chief here at ortiz, who addressed the serious nature of these allegations. you another, some of this at this point is amusing to watch what their apparently minds will come up with next. when in fact, since almost 20 years since our tea has lost all, we have been to start off as journalists, which is bringing the stories and the voices to the audiences destiny media would not allow. and that is something for which the west an establishment has been trying to get rid of us on since day one. the prove that they are in fact afraid even terrified of a dissenting voice. less their people believe it and even more so perhaps they are afraid of this was being heard all around the world in other countries and regions around the planet. because they want to be the only ones to

control all the flow of information. the only wants to control all is in there. well, it's too bad for them because r t is not going anywhere. we will continue to run our job, and we will continue to find new ways to reach our audiences in every corner of the world. some very important points there that this isn't about, you know, a threat to democracy. it's about a challenge to a narrative, which is, you know, centrally created to a client media in the west to correspond to the veneer of plausibility that the united states puts on these allegations. there's a serious, serious attack on the very, very pre tax and context of free speech. you while i'm, it's the fresh sanctions 100 down against our teeth are frequent guess done. cover the cost obtained by us authorities for several hours. another gas christopher had loudly was scheduled for this program today, but declined to come so i think potential risks. he sent us his comments and of

what is happening now in the united states is a blatantly unconstitutional attack on freedom of speech and freedom of the price visa bolding strong and in optical one of the us constitution. however, these freedoms are quickly being eroded by the justice department's help bounce on, come back to this information and draw some propaganda. visa media use some isms for any law. i know, thinking that once counter to the mainstream narrative of the government, the situation has had a profound chilling effect on many commentators, researches and activists who would speak about the needs and current events on all the the shows. how is the us government is more concerned about self preservation, maintaining its power and control than on the liberties of ordinary americans. with global risk consulting us under bruno safe, the us sectioning of r t is an active discrimination against the very notion of truth. essentially

billions of people are abandoning western sources and choose not only west media sources. they're abandoning the idea of the west as a model, they're choosing a different model. i think bricks, the zip sets of bricks and the list of countries which keeps growing a good that wants to join this organization. so we have a dangerous, a very dangerous situation which appears to have been put on there, some kind of control. so i think to compensate for that, then they've gone back on attacking media. the discrimination is against intelligent people, not you know, who want to find out what's going on. curious, it's against curiosity. it's against a two's seeking and finding out the facts. this is what this thing for this information is about here. and there's definitely societies in the west or them,

and i definitely increasingly being divided according to those who want to know. and those who are would rather stick their head to the sand. now rushes minister of the fat and says, confirmed its forces. it made further gains in don't boss taking control of a key supplements and essentially whitening their foothold for further advances by securing the settlements optional and per va. russian troops could not in circles the premium troops in the hurry, opening new front standard yards. ukraine is lost over 700 soldiers in the region in the past 24 hours and hours russian troops advance all the possible field reports continue to emerge. that the us the u. k as well are set to a lot of keep to use western supply. the long range arms to strike bruship must go safe at all. decisions on the monitor have already been made and the response will be hard to miss. the russian president has said everything on this subject. the

decision has been taken all carte blanche and indulgences have been granted to the clients and to yes. so we are ready for anything, and our response will be such that they won't fail to notice. or you're most concerned about that or to the you and said, giving the green light to such attacks would mean nato explicitly entering into a direct war with russia. she would switch, he was focused deep today with a very high degree of probability. we can say that the decision to live restrictions on the use of long range weapons, the strikes the gangs. russia has long been made in the west, and that was simply witnessing the final stage of its legitimize agents in the eyes of public opinion. actually in relation to key f, this does not change anything for us. in principle, the nazi regime has been hitting on territory for a long time outside the combat zone. staging terrorist attacks the gates, the civilian population, and the civilian infrastructure of our country. if the decision to lift the restrictions is indeed taken a will be taken, it will mean that from this moment on, they take countries begin

a direct spoil with russia. as you know, the use of such weapons as possible. and the, if you have access to intelligence from a satellite, the united states and the you, the credit itself does not have such an opportunity. even close. i mean, nature ministry, personnel can program flight emissions volt, ms. all systems. in fact, we're not talking about long kia, have to strike russian surgery with long range weapons, but about making decisions on targets with strikes directly in the west. the fact that the ukranian nationalist will phone the press, the button does not matter. but here's the thing, washington appears to say little issue in laughing ukraine target russian cities with their supply missiles alleging shuts a new won't make us a party to the conflict. we have been very clear that the united states is not going to take part in this war. we're not going to put boots on the ground. we are, however, going to continue to, to equip ukraine so it can defend itself or, and continue to work with

a coalition of countries around the world to help ukraine defend itself. the former special assistant to us president ronald reagan has been speaking to the going underground program, doug band with us if the west is waging a proxy word against russia through ukraine, on whether it's from presidency could help result. the crisis before the committee can be watch later today, here on our team. what do you think then is the next few months? uh, as regards the war in your up, i mean what, what do you think should happen? i know you treated about this before with the disgraceful may british prime minister barak and young so much it happened to him. he's been cooling for uh, obviously uh, weapons the legal weapons to israel. and he's also going for ukrainians more young ukrainians to join up and get killed. arguably in the meat grinder, why the village, the boy scouts and then listen to then skis, ami i was charged for the people who want worship the god of enjoying the benefits

of it. i think the same thing for lindsey graham, for example, us senator favors basically every word that one can imagine. now these are the folks they want to send other people off into extraordinary damage around the world . and i think what's striking about these words is the number of civilians who die in other countries. the united states, the u. k. europeans are not the ones paying the price ukrainians are paying the price. russians are paying the price and the long term costs of this. i think you're just devastated. like we need peace there. you know, that doesn't mean i've been very clear. vladimir putin as an aggressor. i think he was wrong in attracting ukraine. but we have to recognize allied leaders, united states, europe, nato, all shares of layman this. they were utterly irresponsible expansion of nato. and despite the assurances they made to the contrary, despite the knowledge they had for people like birds, that this was an incendiary issue is a big issue of extraordinary importance to russia. that essentially we are fighting to destroy russia by sacrificing ukrainian lives. i think it's disgusting. i think

it's an also policy and over the long term, it's a destabilizing policy. we need to get the war over. i think that requires the us and europeans to talk to russia. it needs to your what kind of a new security structure can be created. ukraine has to be neutral. i think that's the reality here. that projected sovereignty allow it to join the you know, what kind of a system can we create the rush, you can live with the projects, the ukrainians that ends the war. instead of pouring more money into it, more weapons into it and prolonging the fight. we have to be looking for ways to try to end the need mounting tensions across the world. asians call for more dialogue, unless threats, china is defense ministers,

that country should result pressing issues through negotiations and not force. duncan was speaking at a high level of security and defense for them focusing on the asia pacific region. the gentleman told me are no winners in wars and conflicts, and there is no way out of the session with confrontation. the ultimate termination of any conflict is reconciliation. resolving hot issues such as the crane crisis and the israel palestine conflict promoting peace talks for political solutions is the only in the fundamental way out. earlier we welcome to asian, the 1st specialist marco fernandez to the studio. he told my colleague, mohammed beijing could be a game changer in terms of peace making and global conflicts, but that would still require both sides to be willing to negotiate as well. china has been playing this role of mediator in other cases, as we remember last year. the historical deal between saudi arabia in ren actually started in, in russia. russia started this, this role and negotiate

a been china did recently. the same happened with the 14 by the senior organizations this set together in between, again, the set 1st and moscow, then this set and b gene and they made an important agreement. so i think china is really showing by concrete examples how much they are engaged in, in the piece, a tops, but again, you need, would they make a good mediator? do you think? i think so. i mean, they're trying to do that. they did this statement a proposal together with brazil, that was an attempt, it was a real attempt. but again, we need the other side to listen and, and to be able to, uh, reading to discuss at this point, china is very aware of the us behavior in the, in the nato allies behavior. it's not, it's very similar what they do with rushes, a lot of double standards. i mean, date of things. they accuse china of doing things that they do. this is regarding human rights. this is regarding lots of other issues trying to is already having

some, some, a more assertive actions, like for instance, some restrictions for exports of, of so to the community rules, etc. but at the end of the day, again, i mean, right now the most important thing for china and for the whole humanity is this. these thoughts on friday, german navy vessels entered the sensitive straight between china and taiwan for the 1st time in 2 decades. despite beijing's protests and claims of jurisdiction over the area, berlin insist that has the right to seal their. i think the national weather is our international waters, is the shortest route and given the weather conditions the sites. so we're going through 10 and people the taiwan issue is not an issue of freedom of navigation was an issue concerning china and silver and z and territorial integrity. we respect the navigation rights of all countries and relevant wolf is in accordance with

chinese, lower and international law. but we found the highest provocations and endangering of china silver and t and security under the banner of freedom of navigation. well, the incident isn't the only in decatur of just hold tents. the region is, according to a report by the financial times, the elite u. s. navy special forces team that killed the summer, been loud and in 2011 is no longer going special training to counter china as possible military action against taiwan, so called seal team 6. the special naval war for development group has reportedly spent more than a year preparing for such a mission of hits dom neck bass in virginia. it's previously been tasked with the most sensitive, difficult operations around the world in countries such as a dentist on e. m. in syria, somalia unpack is done but it also comes limited increased focus on beijing by the u. s. military. unintelligence forces 20 percent of the c i. a budget is devoted to

china. according to his chief bill burns, representing a 200 percent rise in some 3 years. that's despite washington, having emphasized its commitments to the one china policy. less profit i've now to taipei and speak to political risk, homeless with a focus on asia ros. fine. gold rush at good to see you as we heard 3rd strong condemnation from beijing on what happened yesterday. does this move by the german navy? does it jeopardize security in the region? i don't think so. there. there's a long history of navies from different countries, most notably united states, but sometimes counted us some time. so your opinion, navies that through sale through the taiwan strait and is even the chinese would have knowledge. international law allows ships to show through. they're not withstanding a dispute about whether it's solving and chinese waters or the so called international waters. you, regardless of, of which your answer on that is correct. the right to cl through is something that

is firmly in international law. so i don't think the mere action of the ceiling through is, is provocative at all, even though it does anger the chinese because from the chinese perspective base it is more is a statement of support in taiwan. so economy and they see a simply uh, taking the safest or the fastest route from point a to point b. so different sides are looking at this very differently. at reports of emerge of us special forces training for quite some time as well for a possible mission in taiwan. how to, how to perceive that both that that's coming out. and if it does go ahead, is not a surprise united states, and they are, they mean what the supplier to taiwan? very few of any other countries are willing to solve life is to taiwan. so the united states military trains with the taiwan military since trainers here just by one train and 5 on military, taiwan, and military trains in the united states. and generally speaking,

we know that the united states military use prepare and has always been preparing for the possibility that they may have to right intervene and a war between china and taiwan. we never know whether or not a president of united states would order us military to intervene in such a dispute. but we do know that for a long time the united states was prepared for that possibility. so the fact that the different branches of the us military were a navy seal team csr prepare it for potential activity in, in 5 on if there was a word with china, it's really no surprise at all. how does it chime the with the one china policy about strategic? i'm the gu to t. we here at by does as regards washington's view on, on china. yes. well, the strategic, are you guys to do any policies, but i just a booted to that? we don't know whether or not us president will send us troops to assist taiwan if there is a war that is basically the absence of what strategic ambiguity means. we simply

don't know. but again, we do know that the united states military prepares for the possibilities that a us president reduce the united states to be very clear, does not have an obligation to do so. there are, there is no mutual defense free between. so i want in the united states anymore, there was but the united states terminated factory. you want to discontinue diplomatic relations with taiwan and 1979. so there's no obligation of united states to come to taiwan, say, but strategically, i think you already use the united states doesn't say it really doesn't say well, but it start, but obviously it's, i want to as sorry to us know try to prepare for the possibility how much has this heated things off though? because last month trying to warn the us to stop military collusion, us will call a cooperation with taiwan, saying that the red line must not be crossed in china. us relations could these, that this military training, the length of time, the, the,

the message i suppose that it's sending out co dot be considered as a red light, is not really this agenda for, for many decades. the united states is train this high wind military. we have allowed the taiwan military, your trade in united states. so these ties are, are long standing and there's no full amount of historical precedent for cooperation, security cooperation between 5 on any united states of park china vehemently objects to that they make that very clear in their public statements. and they make it very clear behind closed doors with united states, but i don't think the mere act of training uh is a red line for china, but they do have they, they do have internal stakeholders. they have the answer to the chinese problem. so of course, they're gonna probably say that we dislike there's, we think the united states should stop it, just find me a lot of the articles in mentoring media are, you know, they talk about the story. and they also aside that to the, to this line that there could be a military action on taiwan by china,

in 2027 at from, from your analysis, from what you're seeing hearing. does that look as if it could be happening? we should never discount the possibility. i always say that you have to assume that it could happen tomorrow in 2027 or sometime after that and prepare accordingly. whether that's the taiwan government or the taiwan military. they have to prepare for the possibility because china is, has fairly said they will not renounce use of force towards taiwan service. the possibility certainly exists and it could happen at any time. so thanks for coming in the program, ensuring your views, but it's always good to see ross political wrist unless with a view on asia. russ feingold, a all right, so this how the early we can use a shipping off for now. nothing is going to be here in thirty's with all the latest off that's do hope you can join her. then this is your 247 or 2 and

the the, what about the home square? see? because if i did it here is my oldest divided even my gum. wading through that all the point where you slows, ma'am. just fine. and then one, yes is a good. know. so there's 2 to schedule. you know,

that's the nature shows. boy, did you see the kind of of got.