when so many find themselves boils, the parts we choose to look so common ground the the, this is the story of freedom and democracy in social 3 west. it seems to me that only clinically insane people or those for obviously bias can believe in it's. it's very easy to promote freedom of speech in practice and when it's only your speech that counts. and no one else's. ortiz editor in chief bloss washington sanctions against this channel. and i was an unprecedented financing of a media outlets coming up. the white house continues to talk of freedom, all depressed, as long as he totally accepted the united states respects and champions, freedom expressions, but we will not stand by as r, t and other actors carry a corporate activities in support of russia's nefarious activities. we should not be treated as 2nd class nations. now south africa's response to an american

proposal to give the continent to permanent seats up to you and security council. but without devito power, we hear from a puddle of gas on the continuing to be here. why don't we also have, are plenty to push it this week. so this one is all the goals will turn on to position themselves on the internet when the, when i think he's going to be a very big fight discriminant suit for the best. and, you know, undertaking seats uh, depends on the type, particularly don't be the best mode out. it's not a question of allowing the ukrainian regime to strike russia with these weapons or not. that is a question of deciding whether or not a native country could be directly involved in the military conflict. musket warrens that s p of hughes as western supplied long range weapons to strike nature . it will mean nature was direct participation in the brain complex. this weeks or products gather in the west bank and took to you to learn the death of

a turkish american. an activist kilobytes. really forces that's all ahead this. these are the, the, with a top stories from the past 7 days, and right up to the moment developments as well this sunday. welcome to the weekly accusations that r t is working for russia's intelligence services are something nonsense. that's according directly to the networks editor in chief, margaret read to someone you was responding to the us laughing afresh. roland of sanctions on the channel with washington framing. we spread dangerous north, it's which is cool. it's very easy to promote freedom of speech and practice said when it's only your speech that counts and no one else's. what's even more amusing is that they choose organizations of collaborating with intelligence services, which implies were some kind of intelligence unit ourselves. that's absolutely

nonsense. we're not any part of the intelligence services. perhaps we would like to be. maybe we could hide better if that were the case, but we've learned differently were journalists and we continue to do our journalistic work. well with more and how the white house is relentlessly clumping down on media who dared to ask questions at those in the mainstream. don't largely, here's our t corresponded charlatans, a parent all see we'd like to bring news in news, but it seems for many in power in the us. they want all 3 to be the new is itself for the 2nd time in a month. senior members of the bye didn't administration have accused all to of being part of a network trying to lou of the world into its web, russian reputation just information to subvert and polarized screen of the societies extends to every part of the world. in response today, the united states,

united kingdom and canada, are launching a launching a joints diplomatic campaign to riley allies and partners around the world to join us in addressing the threat posed by r. t and other machinery of russian just information and corporate influence party also secretly runs the online platform african stream across a wide range social media platforms. now according to the i was websites, african stream is and i quote, a pan african digital media organization based exclusively on social media platforms. focusing on giving voice to all africans, both at home and abroad, is in reality the only voice it gives is the kremlin propagandist. the united states respects and champions freedom expression, but we will not stand by his r, t and other actors carry a corporate activities in support of russia's various activities. 14 big allegations. another claim made by the state department was due to all reporting

here at all to support for ukraine is waning in many countries. one of the reasons not the only reason, but one of the reasons why so much of the world has not been as fully supportive of ukraine as you would think. they would be given that russia has invaded ukraine and violated rule number. one of the international system is because of the broad scope and reach of r t. we're proud again to this information and allies are spread to millions, if not billions of people around the world. the global south was also mentioned is oh, i came in support for ukraine. however, a narrow woods countries in the global science have chosen their own solver and pulse and have done so since day one of the conflict. we are not neutral from the very beginning. we have taken sides, and we have chosen the side of peace. and we want to continue to engage with this country on the basis of that we try to respect,

but to not to tell us what to do. and we expect to do as not to tell us what it to fox the chest, and that no one should have any doubts that will make our decision within the framework of strategic wisdom and equity in the west. on the other hand, led by the u. s. as use threats to try and force these countries and it's kona and to impose sanctions on russia. i've been glad to see again the strength of the international alliances come together to, to support you, printer is in its efforts to defend itself. and so i think that's the important the piece here is to try to protect and preserve the international order. we understand . india is a long relationship with russia. and india has to make it sound determinations about where it's wants to be on, on the scale hauled by the action of

a friendly nation. in fact, it's accused us of more than baths. apparently, we don't just unless we're actually spies on those accusations went viral with the main stream media laughing it up, all tease press office decided it was time to be candid. we'd been broadcasting straight out of k t p headquarters all this time. no, but seriously, we're running out of popcorn. just sit and watch what the us government will come up with next about us. he has the winner on social media, c r t literacy and the state department. we're running have to be here blind, hard, i mean, kind of mockingly of ministrations on sanctioning them at this point. we do not laugh at that. that is very serious and we take that very seriously. all these editor in chief also took umbrage with the allegation, the channels doing lists off spies. marguerite, assuming you know, i'm suggesting that perhaps blinking stuck evasions should have been projected

closer to home. then you send to see that it's a classic case of projection. as people say, the guilty party always has the red face, their media, their foundations, the new york times, and all the others published legs daily. what are these leaks? they receive orders from intelligent services, right? this right that they have long since march with each other. if you look at who runs the foundations and often the media there either families of intelligence employees, former intelligence officers or future once they flow from one or getting his ation to another. i have nothing against intelligence services, but it's simply not the case for us. and of course, all of these are ations against our channel come less than 2 months before the us presidential election at the time when the race between kamala harris, who is expected to continue the democrats love of russia bashing. and donald trump, who's being clear, he won't stay in the ukraine conflict, remain neck and neck. preemptively, blaming all t may seem like

a good way to secure the votes, which one have to do to just, why are they doing this now? closing down banding? well, it's clear they have elections and want to disrupt from some things, but most importantly ahead of those same elections, they don't want such a large number of people to know the truth. they need to silence everyone. this is the story of freedom and democracy in the so called free west. it seems to me that only clinically insane people or those are obviously bias can believe in. it's almost okay at all. it is always being question more because when we let our audience question the narrative and make up that own mind without telling them that you want to think, well, let's pick up and zillow. charlotte points there with his story and podcast or page, it's jumped to live on the program from mum bi, you're most welcome edge, they advocate. why do thing? thank you. washington sees such a threat and r t particularly no some 2 and

a half years after we were shut down across the western world. that i think it's more to do with the us presidential election that's coming up very soon. do i think they need to divert attention from rep, what's really happening? the mainstream media in the us is very much pro. come all i have is we know that and what happened in 2020. i think we all know that there was the big questions about the election then, and it looks like they're preparing to do something similar. once again, donald trump would not be able to when i'd be surprised if it wins. so they probably want to divert attention from the shenanigans that are going on back home in the us and blame the show fact of what, what effect of the fact is that the west is becoming less increasingly important than the democracies backsliding. you can see how electrons are run in the west front as another example of what, what's happening. the us is a 2 party system that's my masquerading as a genuine democracy. and when it comes to the west,

you have of the entire legacy media ministry. media is itself is a really, is part of the construction, the new york times the washington, both in the u. k. u or the bbc. and in 2010, the bolts, edward snowden exposed the program that they had prism and which also shouldn't media platforms, all big data. all of the data was available to the us government was because most of them they could depend on the inside pictures of what was happening and the word . so democracy, freedom, human rights really just read them. all of this gives us centrally used slogans, but they actually wish to try and pull up on the nation solver and be brought up dictatorships. let's key. i mean is that a good or no? they should have been in the election in march or april 24. let's see a new clean. so essentially that's what's happening. it's all about. they were taking a pension from what's really happening of the word. the list is becoming increasingly targeted and using it all across europe, it's a drop, and that's why they are, they've chosen and apparently this time to impose sanctions of an r d n. the cardboard. really,

russia is the beginning. yeah. washington say it says well, it will push all their countries to follow its lead when it comes to binding or it see in your view, how likely is that to, to succeed? i think of it may succeed to a very large extent in the you end of new to nations and various other smaller nations across. so let's say that usually pacific region, it probably won't work with india. i don't think so. i don't expect that you have to bend to be whatever emissions are part of the global a. so part of the, the west a little bit what a lot of the may be course into doing this. but the nation is like tying up in the lodge of nations that are more independent and forwarded. i don't think they'll succeed. of those nations getting to having them also participating in binding our be for example, we know that even that india has refused to go along with lifting sanctions industrial for very good reason. we have no reason to do that and we have extra excellent click into that. i feel why should be going on with that. so i don't

think you'd be able to participate in this, but many of the smaller nations would be good nations will probably go along with that. it just doesn't the side to that. and you mentioned earlier, but how it seems that the, you know, the, the consensus among the organizations is, is just a follow the lead of the one before. but you know, there are lots of outlets who i would suggest should watch closely because maybe they are not following fall of washington today, but they may in the future. so the reaction to what's happening to us today that could very well be happening to somebody else going forward. but there's not a lot of talk about that so far. indeed india just because also the media outlet or publication is currently not finding a phone off the west of the mean that they won't be next. and that all depends on introductory relations. i mean, the best would like to him would like, for example, india to been to the end of class and go ahead with various functions and whatever

else it wants to be. we would like india to, to solve as, as a counterweight to try it out. and by piece of business and be train of pro guns as well. so if it doesn't do that, then maybe next week, it's being just done, it miss will happen. so what's happening with the result be rush all result b a r b cord, very much happened to other missions and other publications to model. it's something that it needs to be aware of. so i completely agree with you. and just as an aside to that, we can take a listen together to the mind having washington's buffalo again so called foreign propaganda. speaking about how he believes media in his country, difference to that of other arts that's across the world. that's a big difference than our state funded media. i believe. you mean no one image building gets to tell anyone that v a way are a fee or are out what to say do are right. they ask us questions and we answer them

. that's the difference between a state funded media organization in a democracy and one in and authoritarian government. the leader of r t is admitted that that's what she does and they do. and we've now given you a norm, as example. ready of how dangerous it is around the world, and i sure hope it meets your definition of something new. yeah, that's james rubin. so american media is a beacon, it's an example to others. what do you feel when you hear that? i think the focus is, is astounding. oh it's, it's very of a loan to the new york times, the washington post of the voice of america in the past. when i was a kid in the eighty's, i used to, i don't remember the vice of america transmissions board. gus, it's all propaganda. all news is propaganda in one sense, all the other chore to, to claim to be us is, is uh uh, you know, different from everyone else. i mean it's a democracy and it's, it's the,

the be strong on top of the him, the shining, the light on that as a board. it's hypocritical, vito, exactly what the americans do. everybody does that. and, and nature of the done board actually. i think they, they need to learn to take a 12 and from the us. the point is to claim of the us, the use of, of media outlets are exempt from this. they are totally up, entirely independent. it's, i think it's actually invisible, it's laughable. and that's the point, isn't it? that if you're, if you things like that that, and one view point at must encompass everything that we is the state at actually. ok, then you're going to have a very blond at media outlets. ferry, aren't you out there? yes it's, it's part of the move in to create a model culture and across the world everybody eats the same thing. says the same things. there's the same loads and there's the same culture. i think that's the, that's the direction of the list of all is being pushed and that it meant for that to happen. you need every media outlet and every publication to see of the same

things the, the party line. so it will say as an and get a good target is back to the, to the book and item 80 for me, kind of seeing that, that sort of thing happening to them so that they would like the entire world to be essentially one word government eventually that's what it looks like, and that's why they're pushing for these things and don't like the band and sensor and so forth. and then they go possibly buying every single publication that has a what they consider to be a contract and view or view that does not a cool uh, dental official line. geopolitical specialist opportunity champ, it's been a pleasure speaking to you today. thank you for your time. thank you. well, as washington ponder is why the global side isn't towing. it's political line. here's perhaps one reason why the starts african presidencies. international structures are holding by the constant and for being an equal partner. several run the poses. comments came in response to washington's proposal. to offer 2 permanent seats of the un security con, so to i forget, but there's a,

but it came without any veto power, not having a continent of one point. 3000000000 people represented on the security council diminishes the role of the united nations. we cannot have a 2nd class participation as africa on the un security council. we demand and require that we should have serious participation this week the united states a 9, so it will support the continued permanent states for african countries on the 1st ever known and permanent seats for a quote, a small island developing nation. but the american on point to the un failed to buck the prospective new members holding the veto, saying, washington believes stop, right. could make the security council's work dysfunctional proceed. we don't want to give up our, our veto power. and we do think if we expand that veto power across the board, it will make the council more dysfunctional. you have indicated that we support 2

permanent seats for africa. how that plays out on they ask a continent will be up to the africans to well declare. so the africans will determine who those permanent men they're going to run and have to be voted on by $193.00 members. but who are their candidates for this? so they've decided that themselves because they're not for me to tell. they are for good, right? you need to take the south africa, or you need to take you, jeff, or you need to to, to, you know, take, can you, they will determine who will run for their seats. well, the us proposal sparked debates among african leaders with the red one didn't president, offering his insight on which the continents $54.00 countries could sit at the console. one permanent seed would have to be held by the african union commission on 2nd seat by an african country on rotational basis. not held by any single country permanently. while we discussed the proposal move with a public se, se given only 2 states to such a big, diverse continent already places africa in

a difficult position. what i see where it is going to be very big sites will sits on the will gets a feminine. since obviously guys, uh not, uh, it's not the case of a, uh, the content which is very davis. the best option here is the log file once it's going to uh, once it's going to own the african union and the other one, the 30 us page on the board is it's going to be very difficult to see if this is adopted. i think it will be a very difficult decision uh to, to take because i don't think there's any of the kind of times that they've been, it's another. maybe we can use a right to go all the time. i just did what example united states, i mean that's, that's getting way, but i think uh the government is it for now that you know, under the dating states based on a particular agent would be the best model. i think the approach on that is why it

also comes me to come off of one to be able to support each any point 3 dot dot has the capacity to was timing on this call on behalf of walker. 10 to this, like my point 3 and i do, they have such capacity because my address is like a mini africa. if we go and then the youngest, demographically largest economy and so on. so, so we need to point to the, the twenty's dental to global shift, people hire until far. it was a while ago. i know the whole thing is we don't want to give you additional because you don't want to get into some of the activities. we would do the payment to your interest when we do a visit in court. but why don't we worthwhile to wonder the way they want to spend a bunch? i know we disagree would push it this way. so that is why is all the calls referred to by paul? i'm still positioning themselves on the waterfall or why? again, grunting, house, middle, initial or drove. mitchell,

i need to additional is if you do not initially do, because the reports are increasing the emerging nothing nato leaders are a set to a low key of to use western supply miss solves, distract, deeper into russia. the blocks top military advisor has to him such a move is just the fine militarily. there is a good reason to do that, to weaken the enemy to weaken its logistical lines, fuel and munition, that comes to the front. that is what you want to stop. if at all possible, so there is a good military reason why you should do that. there is a legal ground to do, that's what most go has were involved serious repercussions if nato has applied long range missiles are used to head russia in the you and the countries on voice. it's such a move would expressively main naples, direct involvement in the conflict and be

a declaration of war. here's what vladimir put said earlier in the we can fight the situation. stories for this. there is an attempt to substitute concepts because we are not talking about allowing or forbidding the key of regime to strike out territory. it already does that with the help of drones and other means. but when we have talking about the use of precision weapons, long range western made weapons, it is a completely different story. the fact is that i have already mentioned this, and then the experts will confirm it both in our country and in the west. the ukrainian army is incapable of striking with modern western made long range precision systems. it can only do that by using intelligence from satellites, which ukraine does not have. they get the data only from the you satellites, or from the united states, in general, from nato satellites. that's the 1st thing. the 2nd and very important thing. maybe the key one is that the flight emissions. and these missile systems can, in fact, be inputted only by nato military personnel. ukrainian service men cannot do this.

so it's not a question of allowing the ukrainian regime to strike russia with these weapons or not. it is a question of deciding whether or not a native country could be directly involved in the military conflict. if this decision is made, it will mean nothing else but the direct participation of nato countries. the united states, european countries in the. ready in ukraine, this is the direct participation. and this already, of course, significantly changes the very essence of the very nature of the conflict. it will mean that nato countries, the united states, european countries, are at war with russia. and if that is the case, then having in mind the change in the very essence of this conflict, we will take appropriate decisions based on the threats that will be presented to us. you know, one of those remarks remains the us secretary of state and opponents for an administer. we're mulling over those current restrictions being lifted on ukraine using their weapons or sauce top of the voice support for the us initiative. citing ledger threat from russia. well,

20 blinking also held the countries rump up and funds for its military a fall on the spot, this bending over 4 percent of gdp of defense. this is really the gold standard among nato countries. and of course, it hosts thousands of us and allied forces as low as i was telling, totally published space is regularly breached by russian drugs and massages. last year russian christmas. so traveled through the 2 sides of poland and landed 10 kilometers from my house. so i believe we should do something about it. preemptive. well, we got reaction to developments from german officer and were corresponding, thomas roper, who stays the west, is playing with fire and risking the outbreak of world war 3. the country is at war with the us and, and russia helps them to strike us territory. i think that would not be a discussion with a rush as part of this war. so i think, i think the west is already active. part of the war for

a long time because from international law, and we have this from the ex, parts of the shipment from this type of driven problem and even sharing intelligence data operate of data and toes data is already participation of the war do for the rest is risking this escalation. um, i'm afraid that might be a rational reaction with which the west doesn't like. and then we are coming really into the and it really process of, of escalation steps and whether we find a way out before they are there. well, i'm thinking what would happen, i don't know the really the worst test, the thing, whether it's worse taurus, world war, the real hard world war. because of all these questions we have here, the attacking rush, it was a long range wisdom of weapons, which technically putting this right. would it be managed and programmed by what? by west and by nature, sol, just as i think a step which is um yeah, the final one at which the, the russians were,

the russians will react with what they didn't do until now. this week. so memorial services for a 26 year old turkish american activist who was killed with a shot to the head by the ideas in the west bank. hundreds gathered in the palace, the needs to be of novice and monday, to pay their loss tributes to iceland or ivy. the woman's body was wrapped in a flank of palestine before being sent on to tricky. i should. norah had been protesting the expansion of orthodox jewish settlements, which had the space locals on september 6th, when the idea of opened fire in response to tyra's being burned on rocks, thrown the images here of eisner's funeral, which was held on saturday in the turkish coastal city of the item, the country's just administrative, unprocessed launched its own investigation into the deadly incident. move that's being welcomed by the victims from me. give it to miss casey. when i learned that

our government has not given up on this senseless murder and has opened up an investigation that was very happy, i hope for the same from the american government as well. she is a citizen of that country. therefore, the american government also has a responsibility wherever in the world there is injustice, oppression, or the killing of one of its citizens. america swoops in like the eagle and assembled them. but when it comes to israel, there can be an effort to overlook things. hundreds gathered, indeed in the family home of i should know is get aged, a turkish american, do a citizen that was shot and killed by his really forces in the west bank independent of sydney and territories. now, this is a topic that has been the attention of the turkish media as well as the locals, as well as policy makers throughout the country. and one of the fundamental talking points has been that the fact that i should know is the age. it was a us national, the fact that the united states has not shown the support that many assumed a us national would receive, has become a great talking point. the more important is the rhetoric that was discussed. the

is really mandatory issue statement suggesting that the killing of i should know it was an accident that she was killed by work as a fire or that is really military sized forces essentially fired upon a group that they deemed threatening and provocative. in the west bank during a protest, i protest single legal israeli settlements, however, and that there are a number of rhetoric and new statements and information that is arise suggesting that that was not the case. we understand that the bullet that entered ation was sco went in a straight and linear line not indicated which has a fire or something that would constitute an accidents. on the contrary, the bullet entered her school, killing her instantly. video footage also arise from the events that day suggesting that she was 100 or 200 meters away from the scene at the time of these 400 meters away from these really snipers that shorter and killed. there's also a witness. testimonies, her friends have travelled from the united states in different parts of the world to her family home. indeed, and to show their support to i should know it is again,

this is a, this is a talking point that has gotten many interested for many different reasons. one of them is, of course, the fact that these really military and these really government is killing people indiscriminately matters down in 2003. rachel corrie was killed by the israeli defense forces in a very similar matter. we understand in 2022 american palestinian journalist showing a credit was killed by his really military forces. it seems that because really military was carrying out these attacks, killing nationalism different parts of the world indiscriminately. but when it comes to the united states, of course, there's a different rhetoric and sentiments involved is over the course of the past few years. the united states has express outrage. but when it came to the case of passion as agents, the dual national and the us citizen, the outrage just was not there. and more importantly, the church government says that they are doing everything in their power to ensure that i should know is it does receive justice. those responsible are brought to justice. they're investigating this incident particularly. and there are hopes and at least the probability that the drug.