are we just to look so common ground the the this of the story of freedom and democracy in so called 3 west. it seems to me that only clinically insane people or those for obviously bias can believe in it is very easy to promote freedom of speech and practice it when it's only your speech that counts. and no one else's. ortiz, editor in chief bluff washington sanctions against this chill of unprecedented silencing of immediately coming out of the white house, continues to talk of freedom of the press. as long as you toby accepted north, the united states respects and champions freedom expression. but we will not stand by his r, t and other actors carry a corporate activities in support of russia's various activities. we should not be treated as 2nd class nations, the africans response to the american proposal to give the compliment to permanent

seats of the un security council bought with thought veto power. we hear from a panel of guest this hour on the continuing side to be heard. why don't we also have the country to push it this way? so the wind is on the goals will turn to point to i'm still showing themselves on the clarity is going to be very big fights for municipal afternoon time that are taking seats based on their particular agent to be the best model. the other question of allowing the opinion regime to strict pressure with these weapons or not. it is a question of deciding whether or not a native country could be directly involved in the military conflict a multiple more. it's not a p. if you test western supplied long range weapons to strike russia, it will mean nato's direct participation. you can find new conflict, the

bringing you that top stories from the past 7 days and writes up to the movement developments as well this sunday. welcome to the weekly. this is actions that archie is working for. russia's intelligent services are simply nonsense. that's according to the networks editor in chief margaret right to someone else most responding to the us laughing afresh. roundup sanctions on the travel with washington claiming we spread dangerous narratives which looks cool. it's very easy to promote freedom of speech and practice said when it's only your speech that counts and no one else's. what's even more amusing is that they had used organizations of collaborating with intelligent services, which implies were some kind of intelligence unit ourselves. that's absolutely nonsense. we're not any part of the intelligence services. perhaps we would like to be. maybe we could hide better if that were the case, but we've learned differently were journalists and we continue to do our

journalistic work, as well with more on how the whitehouse is relentlessly clumping. done on media who dared to ask the questions that those in the mainstream large, i do not yours are to correspond to charlotte davinsky powered all the we like to bring me the news, but it seems from many in power in the us. they weren't all to be the news itself for the 2nd time in a month. senior members of the bye didn't administration have accused all to of being part of a network trying to lou of the world into it's with russian reputation. just information to subvert and polarized screen of the societies extends to every part of the world and response. today, the united states, united kingdom and canada, are launching a launching a joints diplomatic campaign to rally allies and partners around the world to join us in addressing the threat posed by r. t and other machinery of russian just information and corporate influence party

also see. ready the mountains, the online platform, african stream across a wide range social media platforms. now according to the i was website, african stream is and i quote, a pan african digital media organization based exclusively on social media platforms. focusing on giving a voice to all africans, both at home and abroad. in reality, the only voice it gives is the kremlin propagandist. the united states respects and champions freedom of expression, but we will not stand by his r, t and other actors. carry out corporate activities in support of russia's nefarious activities. 14 big allegations. another claim made by the state department was due to all reporting here at all. t support for ukraine is waning in many countries. one of the reasons not the only reason, but one of the reasons why so much of the world has not been as fully supportive of

ukraine as you would think. they would be given that russia has invaded ukraine and violated rule number. one of the international system is because of the broad scope and reach of r t. we're proud again, that just information and the lies are spread to millions, if not billions of people around the world. the global south was also mentioned as a lacking in support for ukraine. however, a narrow woods countries in the global science have chosen their own sol, brittany, pulse, and have done so since day one of the conflict. we are not neutral from the very beginning. we have taken sides and we have chosen the side of peace and we will continue to engage with this country on the basis of that and we try to respect. but we're not to tell us what to do. and we expect to do as not to tell us what it to fox the chest, and that no one should have any doubt that will make our decision within the

framework of strategic wisdom and equity in the west. on the other hand, led by the u. s. as use threats to try and force these countries in its corner and to impose sanctions on russia, have been glad to see again the strength of the international alliances come together to, to support you, printer is in its efforts to defend itself. and so i think that's the important the piece here is to try to protect and preserve the international order. we understand . india is a long relationship with russia. and india has to make it sound determinations about where it's wants to be on, on the scale hauled by the action over friendly nations. in fact, that the keys doses move them back. apparently we don't. yeah. unless we're actually spies on those accusations. went viral with the mainstream media laughing

it up, all tease press office to saw this. it was time to be candid. we'd been broadcasting straight out of k t p headquarters all this time. no, but seriously, we're running out of popcorn. just sit and watch what the us government will come up with next about us. he has he went to on social media, c, r t. c. in the state department's head. we're running have to be here blind. i mean, kind of mocking the administration's assess on sanctioning them at this point. we do not laugh at that. that is very serious. and we take that very seriously, all these editor and she also took umbrage with the allegation, the channels doing lists of spies. marguerite, assuming, you know, i'm suggesting that perhaps blinking, so he's ations should have been projected closer to home. then you suddenly see that it's a classic case of projection. as people say, the guilty party always has the red face, their media, their foundations, the new york times, and all the others published legs daily. what are these leaks?

they receive orders from intelligent services, right? this right, that they have a long since merge with each other. if you look at who runs the foundations and often the media there either families of intelligence employees, former intelligence officers or future once they flow from one or getting his ation to another. i have nothing against intelligence services, but it's simply not the case for us. and of course, all of these activities, sions, against our channel, come less than 2 months before the us presidential election at the time when the race between kamala harris, who was expected to continue the democrats love of russia bashing. and donald trump, who's being clear, he wants to end the ukraine conflict, remain neck and neck. preemptively. blaming all t may seem like a good way to secure votes, which one you to do to just? why are they doing this now? closing down banning? well, it's clear they have elections and wants to distract from some things,

but most importantly ahead of those same elections, they don't want such a large number of people to know the truth. they need to silence everyone. this is the story of freedom and democracy in the so called free west. it seems to me that only clinically insane people or those for obviously bias can believe in it. almost okay, at all t is always being question more because we let our audience question the narrative and make up the own mind without telling them that you want to think moscow is hosting the bricks. media summit currently with representatives from global life plates and the officials from around the world in attendance. the forum has seen a declaration promoting a just world order adopted by delegates or to discuss the challenges facing modern journalism with the editor in chief of cherokee is a do use agent. so you said it's vital to protect journal this to ensure the flow of objective news. there are lots of for the ongoing crisis around the world,

lots of conflict zones, which is excellent, throwing news, making businesses. it varies, it quite challenging. one and many countries and many representatives from different new agencies and these organizations from around the world and being falling victim and being the press between the opposing hope all is inside. so the is the, the independence and the importance of media is becoming ever more important at a time. and conflicts are running high, especially in the church and geographies. and we'll get to protect the journalists, covering stories from different perspectives. and that, that will actually make the new stories even more profound and more unbiased. so you know, to, to a, to the, the goal of the journey bit integrity off the journalism that we have to be able to respond all the prices areas where general of them feels being attacked as well as

washington ponder is why the global size isn't towing it's to a political line. here's perhaps one reason why the side of african presidency, the international structures are holding by the continent from being an equal partner. so around the poses comments came in response to washington's proposal to offer 2 permanent seats out the un security council to i forget, but without any visual power, not having a continent of one point. 3000000000 people represented on the security council, diminishes the role of the united nations. we cannot have a 2nd class participation as africa on the un security council. we demand and require that we should have serious participation in this way. so united states and 9 states will support coming to new permanent seats for african countries on a 1st, ever, not in a permanent state for a quote, a small island developing nation. but the american on board to the u. n. fail to box the prospective new members holding

a veto thing. washington believes that rights could make the security council's work dysfunctional organize. we don't want to give up our, our veto power. and we do think if we expand that veto power across the board, it will make the council more dysfunctional. have indicated that we support 2 permanent seats for africa. how that plays out on the africa continents will be up to the africans to well declare. so the africans will determine who those permanent, ma'am, they're gonna run and have to be voted on by $193.00 members. but who are their candidates for this? so they've decided ask themselves if it's not for me to tell they are for good, right? you need to take the south africa, or you need to take you, jeff, or you need to, to, to, you know, to kenya, they will determine who will run for their seats. will the us propose the spark debates among african leaders with the rwandan president offering his insight on which of the continents $54.00 countries consider the cuts?

one permanent seed would have to be held by the african union commission. i'm 2nd seat by an african country on rotational basis, not held by any single country permanently. when we discussed that proposal move with a panel of gas who say, given only 2 seats to such a big, diverse continent already places africa in a difficult position. what i see where it is going to be very big sites will sits on the will get so feminine since obviously guys, uh not uh, it's not so awesome guys of age equipment, which is very davis. the best option here is the log file. once it's going to, uh, once it's going to own vision, definitely can, you know, and the other one, the 30 us page on the board is it's going to be very difficult to see if this is adopted. i think it will be a very difficult decision. uh to, to take because i don't think there's any of that kind of turn it back to minutes

another. maybe we can use a right to go all the time. i just did you see what example enough. so maybe that's, that's getting weight, but i think uh the government is it for now that you know under or did things it's based on a particular agent would be the best model. i think the next why it also comes me to come off of one to be able to support each any point 3 dot dot has the capacity to was timing on the score on behalf of walker can do this like my point 3. and i do that have such capacity because my drives, like a mini africa, if we go them just demographically logins, economy and so on. so, so we need to point to the, the twenty's, dental global shift, people hire until far. and it was a while ago, i know the whole thing is we don't want to give you do to, because you don't want to get into some of the activities we would do the payment

to, to your interest, the vision important. but then why don't we also have the point where they want to spend the once in a week. if i agreed, we would push it this way. so that is why it's all because of prior to buy pull, i'm still positioning themselves, i'm intending, blah, blah, blah, blah. or why? again, grunting. house middle initial on your own visual image, additional and as you can do nothing visuals. because reports continue to emerge that nato leaders are set to a lot of key have to use western supplied miss silas to strike deeper into russian blocks. top military adviser has claimed such a move is justified militarily. there is a good reason to do that, to weaken the enemy, to weaken its logistical lines, fuel ammunition that comes to the front. that is what you want to stop if at all possible. so there is a good military reason why you should do that. there is

a legal ground to do that's moscow. house of war and of serious repercussions of nature was supplied long rings, messiah, which are used to hit russia and the you in the country's own voice. it's such a move. what explicitly mean nato is direct involvement in the conflict and the declaration of war. here's what's letting me put in said earlier in the week about the situation. there was an attempt to substitute concepts appointment because we are not talking about allowing or forbidding the key of regime to strike out territory. it already does that with the help of drones and other means. but when we are talking about the use of precision weapons, long range, western made weapons, it is a completely different story. the fact is that i have already mentioned this, and then the experts will confirm it both in our country and in the west. the ukrainian army is incapable of striking with modern western made long range precision systems. it can only do that by using intelligence from satellites,

which ukraine does not have. they get the data only from the you satellites, or from the united states, in general, from nato satellites. that's the 1st thing. the 2nd and very important thing. maybe the key one is that the flight emissions. and these missile systems can, in fact, be inputted only by nato military personnel. ukrainian service men cannot do this. so it's not a question of allowing the ukrainian regime to strike russia with these weapons or not. it is a question of deciding whether or not a native country could be directly involved in the military conflict. if this decision is made, it will mean nothing else but the direct participation of nato countries. the united states, european countries in the. ready in ukraine, this is the direct participation means that then this already, of course, significantly changes the very essence of the very nature of the conflict. it would mean that nato countries, the united states, european countries, are at war with russia. and if that is the case, then having in mind the change in the very essence of this conflict,

we will take appropriate decisions based on the threats that will be presented to us. you know. meanwhile, the us secretary of state on poland is foreign minister, are mulling over current restrictions being lifted on ukraine using their weapons morsels, top diplomatic voice support for the us initiative, citing on a legit spread from russia. well, tony blinking also held the country's rump up and funds for its luxury calling us about spinning over 4 percent of g d, p on defense. this is really the gold standard among nato countries. and of course, it hosts thousands of us and allied forces as well as i was telling to me. published space is regularly breached by russian drugs and massages. last year, a russian christmas i'll travel through the 2 sides of poland and landed 10 kilometers from my house. so i believe we should do something about it pretty well . we spoke to german ortho, and we're corresponding thomas real estate. he's the west is playing with fire and

risking the outbreak of world war 3. the country is at war with the us and, and russia helps them to strike us territory. i think that would not be a discussion with the rush as part of this was. so i think i think the west is already active part of the war for a long time because from international law, and we have this from the exports of the gentleman from the start of the german problem and even sharing intelligence data, operate of data and sales data is already participation of the wall and the rest is risking this escalation. um, i'm afraid there might be russian reaction with which the west doesn't like. and then we are coming really in a, in a really the process of, of escalation steps. and whether we find a way out before they are there, well, i'm thinking what would happen? i don't know the really the worst test, the thing, whether it's worse taurus, world war, the real hard world war. because of all these questions we have here. um,

attacking rush, it was a long range west of weapons which technically pushing us right. would it be managed and programmed by what? by west and by nature, sol, just as i think a step which is um yeah. the final one at which the, the russians or the russians will react with what they didn't do until now. we're not sweeping anything under the rug in the nord stream pipeline sabotage investigation. that's according to german shelter or schultz who was responding to law school was criticism, but berlin's provost quotes absolutely not transparent. nothing is being covered up . that should be absolutely clear. we want to bring those who did this to justice in germany, if we can get hold of them to me while australia's biggest utility company will stop purchasing and selling russian gas next year of the decision falls under the pretext of entering. no one is financing must go by purchasing resources from the

nation. now europe's energy commissioner earlier claim that the youth is also ready to live without russian guest funds with a 3 were main solely committed to complaints in this phase out of russian gas, which can be done without challenge in europe. son is just security of supply. she sounds like got friends who comes over for coffee every 2 days to tell you that she's totally done with her relationship, even though she's still living in the same house as her acts and won't actually move out since it also said that quote, the volumes that some companies are still receiving from national also do not allow her to blackmail us any more. there are alternatives available here that russia, you can move out and cut all ties any time it's just waiting for the next guy to come along. some leaders in europe have been giving some serious side i to that take though, like, uh, gary and for administer peter c hotel. who said that without russian gas, his country's energy security can't be guaranteed and that it's quote, not a question of ideology, but of physics and mathematics. the sounds like

a teenager in their rooms during the poster or brad pitt, and just waiting for the minor detail with him to actually show up at the door. meanwhile, it is still dependent on russia for nearly 20 percent. if it's gas supplies, as the blocks own state of the u energy union report, underscored this week here see how to begin with yet another one of his dad lectures on the energy issue. he's hungry does not receive my oil from russia. we will simply not survive. we will not be able to supply the country. why? because we don't have an adequate alternative infrastructure. there is another pipeline that runs from croatia from the adriatic coast to hungary, but it does not have enough capacity to supply hungry alone. we also have to consider slovakia, which relies on hungary for its oil supply and simply has an alternative. and to some extent, the czech republic is in similar situation. wow, that sounds like a lot of nice ones that perhaps some other energy suppliers could exploit. nothing

like meeting us for that, which is exactly what the us did when it made a move to replace russian pipeline gas with its own shipped liquefied alternative at multiple times, the cost, i guess that isn't going so great. now though, because earlier this month, the western press was citing a brussels base think tank and reporting that in the 2nd quarter of this year that you was back to importing more gas from russia than from the us with a low you demand and high stocks. apparently minimizing the desire for the price, your american option, and relegating the west 3rd place as a supplier to the you behind your way and russia. not exactly a shocker though, considering what former european central bank president mario druggie said this week about the diary impact of replacing russian gas in his new you competitiveness report, you of was able to satisfy its demand for important energy by procuring ample

pipeline guess which it causes for around 45 percent of the use natural gas inputs in 2021. but the sol, so relatively cheap energy, has no disappeared at huge cost to europe. the u has lost more than a year due to the growth while having to re direct method fiscal resources to add a just subsidies and build a new infrastructure for important liquefied natural gas minor detail, right. listening to the energy commission, or do you think that there's all sorts of other suitors out there just ready to step in and give the block whatever it needs? well, here's the us based institute for energy economics and financial analysis. think tank with the latest dating report, you could say an assessment of the use actual chassis with several of those potential suitors. island g info's to your from the us, decreased by 50 percent year on year. those from cas are dropped. so the one beside those from nigeria felt 43 percent. conversely, impulse from russia, well up 11 percent. looks like for all it's cost at public whining about russia and

talking about ending the relationship for good in favor of something better. the you is still at least filling its boots on the down low. it seems like all of this rhetoric is just really about keeping up appearances. well, the german government and non to this week validates the tough and border restrictions. i close the monitor who's allowed to enter the country that's led to criticism from neighbors when he is likely, i mean, we want to further reduce your regular migration to this. and we're now taking further steps that go beyond the comprehensive measures currently in place until we have strong protection of the use external borders. we need to strength and control at our national borders. since the average annual should. this is the fact to a large scale suspension of the shipping in the area in response to the mistakes of german policy for many years ago. such actions are unacceptable from the polish point of view. it is germany's internal policy that leads to such steps. not our

policy towards illegal immigration because of all the gag. a 2nd. i have made it clear that we will not take anyone back who is sent to you from germany. there is no room from a new but from an austrian perspective. the measure is also enable authorities to reject more migraines, directly from tiers are supposedly aimed. a tackling quote is for ms. tara, the restrictions come as the ruling social democratic party use ratings plummets ahead of next year's federal elections. chancellor shows has called immigration. the key factor in the recent search of support for the right wing alternative for germany. we spoke to be a f. these gunner lindman who receives his party, morton since 2015. now the open order policy would lead to endless problems. government government to try to change the refugee, but it is a good one year before the election because they have seen the election in the to be in exec sonya,

the government to the parties. so social democrats about the green button as it was like sonya and julian, maybe a 10 percent votes of awards and 90 percent of what the out against the federal government and the government of what else was by uh, germany invited to the migraines that resolved any reason this year so does go angela america. she opened the, bought up v as a f. d, as in terms of beginning on 2015 we cannot opens above you have 2 girls have bought a we can find solutions to ahead of us. you will been going to buy one the solution, but not this is nearly 10 years open. bought us in germany right next to exam as one on one with a slope. i can be p who talks the political re, alignment currency on folding on the confidence, gender, indoctrination in schools and how the european union support, conflict based policies,

these things must be addressed. that's all right. the, [000:00:00;00] the hello and welcome to wells a part for more than 3 centuries, ever since the peace of west valley or european powers agreeing that identity on southern teeth can hand them have. you don't need to like me or if full of me for us to we side by side. but the sound of the cold war called this principle into question, allowing some nations or some idea all induced to claim that they are inherently

better than others. and therefore have the right even the responsibility to make others in the image. whereas if leaving europe, the west and the world, well to discuss it, i'm now joined by midland rick member of the european parliament for somebody here and leader of the republic moment. mr. eric is great to talk to thank you very much for being available. thank you very much for the invitation. i am looking for bye or questions to meet your especially because this here is ticket remarkable, both for your opinion and worse than politics. because i think never before we have such a clause between the so called establishment parties and the so called extreme or extremist bodies. now i'm sure you don't consider yourself to be a radical and you have. this is how you are sometimes referred to in mainstream media. um, let me start by asking whether you think that gives you any additional support of the media voters. oh, come on, i don't think that we are to any kind of extremist, this is just

a label which is used by our booth to go open. and so if they simply are on out of arguments and they have nothing left to say. so they starting labeling us as a x 3 means as a radi goes a, as a russian asians and so on. but let's ask ourselves, what's really extreme about our political opinions or about our political program. we want to end the war, and we wanna bes, east extremism. we want to protect europe uh, against illegal migration. we want to protect our family and traditional values. we want to protect freedom of speech as well. is this, the text remains? i'm, i don't think so. so let's have a look around, let's have a look at the current and here will be in governments and it will be in commission . and i think they are the ones who are destroying our continental, already throwing our roof, our space. and they are the ones who are to be called extremes. what i,