the, the hello and welcome to across the full board. here we discussed some real in the hey everybody. i'm rick sanchez. this is the weekend review show. and these are

some of the things that we're about to be talking about. people inside you crime and people outside you crane started asking questions about whether this was a good deal and that was at that point that it, that it fell apart. they're eating the dogs, the people that came in there eating the cat, explode, nevada, extreme comments from victoria newland and former president donald trump, top our list of stories and this weekend review. i'm rick sanchez. this is direct impact. let's do this the the . okay, so here we go. we are now less than 2 months from knowing over the next president of the united states is going to be at each week. the well, the situation becomes more and more critical. joining me now to go through this week's advance or the host be critical hour on sputnik radio, dr. wellman, leon and collin nixon. gentlemen, thank you for abiding by the c c memo,

the co listen casual day memo and let's get through it. so look, no matter who you were pulling for no matter who you think won the debate, there is no denying that carmella harris and her team seen that seemed to have come up with some kind of plan to bait donald trump. right, to bring him and most observers on both sides of the aisle are saying it worked, the commer harris something to basically see take it they have and she has destroyed our country. this is someone who was openly said he would terminate. i'm quoting terminate the constitution of the united states. i want to get the war settles. i know zalinski very well and i know put in very well, i have a good relationship and they respect your president. she's

a marxist. everybody knows she's a marxist. her father is a marxist professor in economics, and he told her, well, so essentially we wanted to show you a little bit of everything as a, as a discussed the topics of the day there look neither one of them were specific about their plans. but, but there was a tendency and it seemed to me and i want your reaction clear that she was coached to stick in every one of her comments. something that she knew she would not be able to resist and therefore reveal himself in some way that they had planned on him revealing himself, did i, did i explain that correct and get us started there. wilma, i think you did explain it quite well. they, they did their homework, they did. one of the things that had, that has been said about a former president from his, he is remote,

he's been in more debates than any other president or individual in that position. and so they watched the video, and they, the 1st thing that happened, she stepped across the stage. yeah, right to him. she as they say, she stepped to him and then and gotten this chest. and do someone with that type of personality does not look favorably upon those types of aggressive action from a woman. the woman from a yeah. or from a woman of color. i mean, uh they pushed his buttons and he never was able to pivot out of out of that having his button pushed to really taking control of the circumstance. but i, you know what i thought, and i told this to my wife as i was watching this, i saw that at the very beginning. if somebody had told him,

you need to be more disciplined, you need to stick to the issues and you need to talk about your stuff, not hers. i thought he was doing very well with that, i thought the 1st half hour of the debate, i looked at my wife and i said, i think he's winning this thing. something happened about the mid point where we started seeing angry donald trump up here. i saw the sweat coming down, you know, the sides of his nostrils. and then i looked at my wife and i said, no, garland, something's changed here. i don't know what it is. she's getting under a scan. did you see that to? yeah, but i think it was kind of w, this was kind of a w, w, a f, a, a, you know, wrestling said river why wrestling federation kind of thing where the discussion afterwards is getting under people's scan, who was angry and who was it? and i think a donald trump, as they say in football, left a lot of points on the field. you know, the yes, he did hit the issues which were that, that people are holding on, which is going to be the foreign policy to stomach its yeah,

assume that the money that's going to for an a pilot policy is affecting domestic policy. and of course, the issue of a price is then inflation. so i think he did, you know, score a couple of touch downs on the issues that are important. he left a lot of stuff on the table mainly because he harped on immigration far longer than he showed nothing wrong with him getting an immigration, but he took it too far and, and he shouldn't really, what do you deal with immigration if he did done that with inflation. yeah. it would have been much more fire or i don't think it really hurt him that bad. i don't think this is going to move the needle. you know what i think his best moment was the closing argument. that's one somehow he thought, oh my god, i was supposed to get this this. let me get it out there. now that's when he turned over and said, look, you put an offer is a 3 and a half years. why don't you get a name and stuff done that you've been talking about? he should've made that his main point and drilled that throughout the entire thing . instead, most people didn't hear it because most people were sleeping cause it was almost

past midnight already, at least i wanted to go to sleep. unfortunately, i couldn't cause i can pay to do is go ahead when i, what the 1st question that was asked. yeah. are you better off today than you were 4 years ago? and she wasn't able to command data. she couldn't talk about the jobs report now. she couldn't talk about interest rates. and like you, i sent a message to a buddy of mine saying on that 1st question, it's over, she's done, she's lost because she demonstrated no command of the subject matter. but what happened? the conversation shifted to more of a narrative, conversational visceral discussion about abortion, about immigration? anybody could have had those conversations because she was talking data policy

and specific point. and as oh, i've been calling you right. and because of that, that's where he fell into the tried into, you know, we'll know exactly of turning the whole thing into another one of his rallies with all the people who come to see him who already we know we're going to vote for him and not thinking i need to be talking and more broad terms. this is why he got heard that, but we live in an era where it's not about the totality of the moment. in fact, relatively few people will have watched this entire debate. relatively speaking, it will be a very, very small number of people, but almost the entire world will see the clips. and that is why the haitians, inc caps, comment that from, from mr. trump, i think is going to be very damaging for him. not, not only is the clip being played everywhere, so are the means. and so is this reaction that was recorded in real time

the, those are real people watching the debate, laughing when they'd heard him say that and, you know, just to admit, my wife was sitting next to me when we were watching the debate together. she laughed when she heard that as well because she thought it was, i mean, i'm sorry, it was just a ridiculous thing for a guy who wants to be president of say, i mean, and then when he's out there and then when he's asked about it, he says well, but i saw somebody say it on tv. come on man. i mean, but i think i don't think it hurts donald trump for this reason. the reason why are people voting for donald trump? it doesn't have to do with donald trump, you know, be in some cool, calm and reasonable, brilliant philosopher, you know, me, pickle, expect that stuff. and donald trump, the people that are going to support donald trump, had long since given up, you know, any thoughts that he friday, your average person. i think that, um, what about me on the side as well? what about the, on the side?

it's garland, there's still a group of i know it's weird for people like you and me and, and, and, and, and, and, and the good doctor here but that, but there are people are there, believe it or not, i want even watching this crap. they're only going to see a tick tock dates on this point. it's not a matter of how much it helped or heard him. it helped her. and because she's the one that has to pull in the undecideds, she's the one that has been translating the dual haters. she is the one that has to bring more to her camp because he's already decided he's not expanding the electorate. she has to expand the electorate, but how about how garland? well, you know, we both interrupted you. so how you were going to make your point about the fact that you don't think it's going to hurt them as much as most people are saying. make your point on that, please. because i just think you have to look at the reasons that people voting for donald trump. and i think this particular election, a lot of it doesn't have to do with donald trump. i think

a lot of people are voting with for donald trump for 2 of the things that he said, one installation, the other, when he said, you know, we're close to world war 2. i think people are concerned with foreign policy. they're concerned with that. and as malcolm x said, any place is better than here, and i think there are people that are looking at the current administration thing. any place is better for here. they vote for and you know what? a wrinkly old plumb if they could to get out from any of the what they see is the as a disaster, the by yourself. but what you didn't, but you didn't address the question that the, that wilmer and i were talking about that there are as many as 7 percent of the people who are undecided. do you not think they i by the way and they're not, they don't watch the news like we do. they don't even they probably didn't want you to be, but they'll see that tick, tock, video. do you think they'll be moved? i don't think that's. i don't think that kind of thing will be made make a decision. i remember watching uh, george w bush and like, oh for both of us. he was a horrible debate or he was the one of the worst i've ever seen. any one because

ultimately in the end, i don't think these debates rarely moved. the numbers rarely fair pointed to your point. they said hillary clinton b donald trump, 2 or 3 times and he's still beat her on election day. so there, there's a point to be made that maybe these debates are somewhat overblown because they are media. that's okay. when we come back, we're going to talk about ukraine, and we're going to talk about the peace deal that watson's because boy, is there a break through and that this week we finally had somebody just say what everybody knew. and she's big. you know her, you'll hear from her will be right back the, the, what is part of the visit that the employee would post that isn't the, the place you of us and that in the word part,

is it something deeper, more complex might be present? good. let's stop without cases. let's go products. oh, what i would show, they just don't have to shape out the application and engagement trails. when so many find themselves will support. we choose to look so common ground the the, the rick sanchez and the gangs all back wilmer garland. rick. yep. we are quite a 3 some and we are going to be bringing you uh the weekend review. in fact,

we're halfway through it. we talked about the politics. now let's go to the deal politics, and this is about ukraine. and it sounds like ukraine is about to be a check made it right. if this were a chess board, it's like, oh, i mean that he's staring down in my queen, right? and is, that's the case. then. what's the next move, right. i mean, the russians are moving into that area. watch this. let's look at this. this is the next move, the guardian is now reporting that the u. k. has already given permission and the us is about to do the same for ukraine to fire french and british made cruise missiles into russia. unfortunately, the people of the united states know nothing about this because our media does not report such things. you would expect something like this would involve some kind of congressional have not national referendum from the people. after all, we're talking about bombing rush job, or some would say, and this is where i want you guys to come in. is this real?

are we really considering doing this? and we're going to let by them just make a decision one day. or is this all a bluff because it's needed for negotiating leverage. because right now the west and ukraine have almost no negotiating leverage left as a result of what's going on in the curse region of garland. i'll let you start, you know, i, i think you're looking for a rational reason, re reason of the neo cons and not rational. they just continued to escalate. they don't know. they don't have a plan. their original plan was the collapse of russia with sanctions. with that didn't work, they've been just effectively putting out fires and i don't mean putting out fires in ukraine. i mean putting out fires here. i would argue this is most likely related to the us selection. they want to look tough and strong and they're moving because things aren't looking well for them so that it's not rational. it's not a play, a plan and it's extremely dangerous. could you imagine?

i'm just thinking uh, wilmer is the 3 of us. let's take ourselves back 20 years and we learned, or there was a new york times headlines saying us considers bombing russia using cruise missiles and russia. wouldn't that have been a big story? wouldn't that have been like 24 hour news coverage? what the hell, man, where is the story of 20 years ago? it probably would have been a republican. it would have been a bush administration that was talking about launching missiles into russia. now it's a democratic administration that is more hawkish than the republicans. the other thing, this isn't as simple as sending missiles into russia who's providing the coordinates for the missiles, who's going to launch the missiles. that means the united states is now even more directly involved in this conflict. then then originally thought,

so now if russia decides they want to take their pound of flesh from box. well here's what's interesting. we are now giving them one more re send to do. so here's what's interesting about this case, one way or another, the truth always comes out, right? and what you were just talking about was highlighted this week. here it is, victoria no look has just come out and made a blockbuster confection. new. and as in case some of our viewers don't know, was the under secretary of state in charge of all things ukraine. and she's earned a reputation about as being among the most play or hawkish. neil comes in the entire u. s. government. she's now admitted that yes, it's true about a year and a half ago and about a $100000.00 that ukrainians ago. she and others killed a piece deal that would have ended the war and ukraine. and here she is admitting it the ukrainians began asking for advice

on where this thing was going. and it became clear to us, clear to the brits, clear to others that prudence main condition was buried. and an amex, a to this document that they were working on. and it included limits on the precise kinds of weapon systems that ukraine could have after the deal. and there were no similar constraints on russia. russia wasn't required to pull back russia wasn't, wasn't required to have a buffer zone from the cranium. puerto wasn't required to have the same constraints on its military facing ukraine. and so people inside ukraine and people outside ukraine started asking questions about whether this was a good deal. mostly, of course people outside you, craig, and it's probably like

a true military contractor. well, if we had signed this, we wouldn't be able to sell enough stops to reclaim, i mean, you know, we wouldn't have been able to give them more, you know, military hardware. remarkable to watch this for me anyway, but so revealing. but wait, there's more, here's a 2nd confirmation that there was a deal that was killed by the brits in the united states. it comes from one of the ukrainian diplomats who actually agreed to the bill. he was so happy he says they actually were getting ready to pop a bottle of champagne to celebrate. i came back with the negotiating process completed completely as this was successful, week old position pin both all the on will for this because like with me, i found a bottle of champagne and many as because as was completely successful negotiations, this is, this is, i don't know i, garland getting that taken away, man. well, as it is, it, we undermines the campbell harris's reason argument then. and of course the,

the by the administration is continuous argument that ukraine is an independent and sovereign nation democratic nation. and that we are know if they want independent and sovereign, they wouldn't have to ask permission. and once to be celebrated a, a decision that was made by ukrainian diplomats, it would have help. but because victoria newman was part of the cabal that over through ukraine and inserted a puppet regime, it was the, the us imperial is the brits, etc. that made the decision for ukraine. it's definitely, it's now it, they make it clear. no ukraine was not allowed to make that decision because there's no such thing as ukraine. it is a political and military tool of the us neo costs and nothing more. i'm surprised. see, so on a bash certainly admitted to all of this. i've got to be thinking that there's some people over the state department who watch this and their job was dropped and saying why the hell is she saying this? why should given up the game? what's wilmer? i mean, what do you think?

i well, it just shows the arrogance of, of her position and she doesn't think that there's anything wrong with saying this a because it's true and b because as far as she's concerned, it's her show garlands. absolutely right. this is always been a proxy war. the ukraine in this context was never a democracy, the united states over through that democracy in 2014. she was instrumental in doing that. when she talks about there were people in ukraine and outside of ukraine that were opposed to this. well, he were those people, the crazy, the impress, gained in to serve as a performed on the front line. and so this, this demonstrates if 1st of all, what a report really quick, but please this conflict, this conflict didn't start in february of,

of 22. it started when the united states started putting missiles on the border of countries that are bordering russia. yeah. and just the same way people want to say october 7th, started a conflict in, in, in, in guys a know that started the 1947. right. right. it's a very limited perspective of history. now it's, it's, it's a fascinating i, i think that was one of the most fascinating stories that we covered all of this week. and it's interesting that there's us and then there's a few other networks and maybe a couple of people in who are independent journalists and other than that nobody will ever know about it. and that's sad by the way, sat as it may sound, many of the people who work for us in this country, either elected or appointed or incentivized to encourage wars that most of us don't want right. but, but those people are extremely powerful. and they often have interlocking interest where, where they serve more than one master. there's obviously no better example of this

anywhere than dick cheney, who's literally the leading figure in the military industrial complex, who then went on to become the president of the united states. oh, that's right, sorry, vice president wink. and then he sold us on a war mostly through on troops. i mean this guy is the neo cons neil con. and that is why i find this next clip that i'm going to share with you so fascinating. here's some chinese lead or interesting man lecturing the former vice president. he tells him essentially, you guys, you, mr. vice president, are now doing the other is what the british wants to do. you. and then he asked them, how do you learn nothing from your own histories, experiences go when you became the number one, you call to me the yeah, number one, unit or power. you became a student and then also your to fall. well, boss, the british you want to for the others. yeah, and i don't,

i'd rather you join the other west and impurities for your, for your read the china in the 19 filters. america was a lead to your rates, the grand and you soon and you'll be the last not on trouble in the middle east and the around around the words you had tried to so just called a month used to live in texas. and you were dealing with a computer problem is hung up. i do have some kinda munitions and i was quite happy to thank you for me for you to do with me the chance. remember so i remember it's our. yeah. and. and he's a little guy and he speaks with a broken english accent obviously. but there was something about him sitting there

as almost an act of defiance saying look at yourself, dude. and cheney slumped over in the chair just i don't know, there was something about that moment that i thought was worth sharing. guys, please. uh, the new start. i'll tell you what was really powerful about that moment. i was looking at the people in the audience, one of the arab gentleman had a big green on his that's the to he was just sitting there, smile and like watching his favorite movie. right. and that, but that's important because that's the global south. the people who have been oppressed by the british oppressed by the us who just want to be left to low folks to watch the hollywood movies for years and said, wow, the us, you know, it doesn't look bad. i kind of like to be like that. and they got stomped into the ground. so the important thing we see there is that there are people all over the world saying, yeah, you know, you guys were in a position to be very, very powerful. and you took advantage of it to oppress others. and over through other governments at all, and i'm glad that there's someone in the world finally powerful enough to stand

there to your face and to tell you that you've done wrong. and we all out here, the mobile cell agree. yeah. if that guy is kind of the personification of the global self and maybe more specifically the personification of china, which is about to take over as the number one liter economically. anyway, in the, in the, in the world, the position one sale by the united states to that point where you say, what i say, rick, sure. the neo cons neil con is now endorsing. com. la harris. yeah, that is not a, that is not right for a confirmation of her. what it demonstrates is then she attacked donald trump in her speech from the right. not from the left. yeah. it's not that dick cheney is moving to her position. it's not that the

neo cons are moving to her position. it's a bad obligation that she and the democrats are moving to there's. oh, that's great point. that's a great point. it's such a great point. we're going to just, yeah, you're, you're finally got one, right? kidding. uh, but when i hang up with garlands, do i hear that i hear that from my kids all the time that you finally got it right . um. great conversation guys. it's an important conversation. i. i'm so glad to millions of people get the heroes each week have these discussions because i think i only wish we could grow that more in the united states where some of our fellow compatriots could understand some of the things that are taking place that we should just, you know, understand to be responsible for and be responsible for the actions of our leaders . but it is what it is. that's our show. remember, always look outside your own box and don't live in one box. by golly, i'm rick sanchez and we'll be looking for you next time the

the see the silver. so the move up to somebody how can it be that arms is shipped to the middle east from a country whose top officials constantly complain about shortages of munitions and military equipments. destroyed no pain, the boy passed low green and maybe a little in your system and below came along the nominal facility or some of those other slash we, i'm about to the easiest you to not know. so what are we and we'll have an easy somebody remember, bubble sold will not be so kind and why are weapons from ukraine spreading over the world?

to turn this country into a major arms hub, will continue to bolster ukraine's and forces by rushing them occasionally use that they need to defend their country. the everyone knows very well that we don't sell but known as pineapples or any kind of children's toys. we sell weapons. yes, we're also known in the world as homes dealers that we must not be ashamed of that the, the strength of the continental wasik was suddenly into rough. with the rest of the world. we're going to relate to the wind in terms of donations on, in tons of tray, africa must define what she wants. political assets must define ourselves. cultures. africa must define ourselves critically. the cause of the guys no choice

but to move forward. forward. she with the american, with a long history of felonies and the last 2 also tried to recruit mercenaries for you print. we take a closer look at the suspect and the 2nd assassination attempt on donald from the black and white. this is about good versus evil drains. and the rest of the world are sharing and kind and generous on self concept. local law enforcement is mincing words, questioning how the government managed to get close to the former president and saying the f. b. i needs to take the possibility of a larger conspiracy seriously. present for pros.