the, the the hey, rick sanchez here. this is direct impact and this is what we're going to be talking about. slides division one is the depth. yep. the plaza applause breaks out at the united nations as israel is told to end its occupation of gaza. i'm rick sanchez, lot going on with this. let's do this thing the right a lot to talk about on this day. let's begin with this. a really complex mess that is the middle east and we do is with the study sounds of a minute more in the background. i mean if, if you, if you listen carefully,

you can almost hear the drum be right now. if you will, if in the background, given israel's latest high tech, sabotaged attack on 11 on 1st, the un general assembly comes out and they meet and they're meeting in new york this week. as you probably know, they've just passed a resolution that essentially tells us realize needs to find a way to stop the occupation of the palestinian communities. resolution is life e as in slice of 51 slides revision one is adopt it. is there a little behind a time here cause i mean, forget 1000. it's what israel's doing right now and loving on. not a gaza. that is really making headlines, right? thousands of people in love it on by the way, in syria as well, but to a lesser extent, had been injured, killed, many of them disfigured for life when their digital devices suddenly blew up in

this highly sophisticated and coordinated attack, perpetrated, i think it's safe to say by israel, the wall street journal is reporting that is real sabotage and re routed the supply chain of these pagers that were ordered by the militant group. uh, mazda, i mean part has bola, what, how did they do it? how, how are you able to make this is a phone, not a pager, but how would i be able to take this thing and somehow stick a port explosives in there to turn? what is a pager or a cellphone or any other device into a little mini bomb? how do you do that? once this, once this fascinating video put together by a i tele, a spike agency is believed to have intercepted the shipment and tempered with the pagers. they discreetly altered the internal components, replacing one of the 2 identical batteries with the hidden explosive device. this modification was done so suddenly that it went unnoticed. imagine you're looking at 2 identical batteries inside the pager. all of this is speculative. if it were part

of a spy agency, we might consider disguising one of the 2 identical batteries for different purpose . one battery would provide the necessary power for the device while the other could potentially serve as an exclusive, cleverly concealed within the page or to expand on this theory, an alkaline a battery weighs approximately 23 grams. interesting, lee reports in the news had mentioned that an explosive weighing about 20 grams was designated a 20 grams of c 4, which is all i guess it takes to make a little mini explosion. i mean, i guess significant enough to hurt people or below their hands off. so what's the reaction to all of this? well 1st let's call it what it is. it is an active chair, obviously, people 11 on a, terrorized by this on the part of israel, which has killed many people, mostly civilians. quote, suspected of being a part of his bo and also killed or maimed of other people who were near them. children, in some cases, anybody who was, i'm lucky enough to have bought one from them,

or borrowed one of these pagers or happened to be near a page or when it went off so that that's significant, right? first, did israel do it? let me put it this way when cnn, which is all but state tv for israel is reporting that israel did it. oh, i'd say you pretty much assume that is where israel was involved when 3 of that is saying they did it. they probably didn't. even the un is condemning the attack on civilians as the jo. surprisingly enough, most countries in the global south community who don't feel compelled to wait for instructions were the reaction from washington. so you ask yourself, what is the reaction from washington rick? well, watch what happens here. when the white house national security spokesperson, kirby is asked directly about israel's involvement is

if, if a state actor was involved in any way and what took place in level, is that acceptable look, that's a great hypothetical driver that i'm simply not not going to engage. so it's not that that's not the case, there was nothing more to add on these incidents. i, i, i understand the question about the engage and have a set of goals or speculate about what did or didn't happen. state actor, what state actor is room, what is real page or what page or explosions were to happen? wow. like, i don't know my what, what, what do you think of that, mr. kirby's? not so elegant response. oh john kirby always trying to find an exit ramp for himself or obviously for good reason. i mean he works for the bite and administration at present. um. so i think he's trying to obviously put distance between washington

d. c and israel. and this moment for obvious reasons, because, you know, there's sort of this big collection that's happening here in less than 50 days here in the us. so he kind of doesn't want to entangle vice president cala harris because she's still the sitting vice president when you actually have one of the chief commanders of the is really military. you'll have a lot taken ownership. yeah. for this he's saying he has said publicly that, that is really military is now moving to the next phase. yeah, they're bragging about right? welfare who's branding about it. so for me to kind of back pedal and just say, oh, that's a hypothetical. i can't answer that. i mean, it's just kind of a, a big, big chicken or he's being a big was and doesn't want to have to face questions about whether or not washington was aware of what you're saying. could say,

washington was aware just or you may just to just be honest, i mean just to sit there and say like you like your surprise. oh my god, really, there was a start. all really there was some papers that i told her to really we didn't know . tell me more. i mean, it just, it defies. could unity which then also hurts your credibility and, and that's what i hate to see is a citizen of this country. i don't like it when people look at us and laugh and that's response. yeah. laughable. yeah. to half of the link at least play the part . yeah. what you're saying at least play the part. yeah. own it. anyway, look at this just right, by the way, i'm going to tell you something else. i remember when the, the hall explosion took place in moscow. it took about 15 seconds for this guy to one, to get in front of a camera and a microphone to immediately announce that ukraine had nothing to do with it. do you remember that? yeah. yeah. what is that or the cross?

the crock is new. the call the cross. yeah, that's the one i was talking about it. so i got to put to be like, right. so he's like, he's like all friends and in key i've had nothing, no way. right? yeah, right, right. exactly. because because he can't find a real way out because he knows that the whole world knows that is real. it's not that big, clear any of their actions with washington. they actually dictate to washington and let washington know what they're going to do. and washington, which is never bothers, but even the want to answer it. but even if we weren't involved, he's not even coughing to that. he's saying what explosion, what are you talking about? i mean, oh, really? like, like you haven't heard of it and doesn't think israel quite a bit of the whole world's already gone beyond that. see, that's where again, credibility, transparency, 2 of the most important things in life journalist should have it. countries should

have it, governments should deploy it. all right, let's go somewhere else ever since the debate. we've been waiting for a poll that gives a read on the election. and while there have been a lot of snap goals and questionable polls that i've told you, i don't believe in those things. i think most of those are crap. especially the snap pulse. there haven't really. we've been waiting for one poll that kind of gives us an indication of how the debate went and whether americans really were moved one way or another by the debate. i think this one is noteworthy and it's a very credible paul. let me show you this, this is the de moines register. pull. why is this important? all right, this is one of the most respected poles. and because it's iowa, it really represent, it's a pretty good cross section of the country. you know, we're not talking about brooklyn here, or savannah, georgia or something like that. this is middle america a place where by the way, it's mostly white anglo saxons. and most of them vote for trump, most of them like drop and they have voted for drop every single time. it's not an

outlier. i was also a state where trump did when big against buying. mm hm. and back in june, he was winning iowa by 18 points. so he's winning know about 18 points. this new pool comes out. now domain register quality pool, which by the way, that doesn't mean it's right, it's still could be wrong. and now, according to des moines, register, he's one in iowa by 4 points. that means he's within the margin of error, which means it's a statistical time. that's not a good sign for donald trump, obviously. now we're not talking about always donald trump gotta lose. i always probably going to win iowa. that's a very narrow margin. and it's noteworthy to kind of trends that are worth looking at my know yeah, i've got one word about why and how calmer harris has narrowed that gap between her and trump and his lead. he's indeed had a humongous lead when biden was still in the race back in june. right. so the

answer is women. and if you look even closer, it's younger women that are actually now excited about calm la harris, simply for the fact that she's a woman. i know a woman of color at that harris leads with women in iowa, specifically according to the des moines register. harris leads 53 to trumps. 36 percent is our ability with women. but on the flip side, conversely, trump is leading with men 59 percent to 32 percent over harris. so it's like a battle of the sexes. yeah. in there in iowa, and as you said, it is a bell whether state what will is add in the r f k component though, rick, here's the danger is our of k was, was grabbing about 6 percent of the poles there at the time, and he only recently dropped out, but it was too late to take his name off of the ballots. so theoretically,

he could still get a few percentage votes because people, for whatever reason. yeah. yeah. yeah. they don't like harris. they don't like whatever. they'll vote for for r f k, just because that could actually check shift the election there. i don't want to take too much time for my next guest who's coming up, but i do want to ask you what you follow this what the, what cam trump do? what does he have to do to, to, to throw a wrench in this trend that seems to be favor and couple of harris what, what are you hearing? what do you think of or more broadly, not specific to iowa. i have taken peaks now and again deep into the trump mega world. and what i'm hearing is that they want to see a shakeup of the trump vance ticket. oh that a lot of the people that are deep maga actually want judy vance off the ticket because they see him as to favorable to the establishment. and as a sort of incentive to have trump die in office or get off or whatever,

whatever it is they believe they say that with vance being one heart beat away from the actual presidency that that's actually incentive to get trump booted out one way or another. and in order to secure trumps life, they say that trump needs to put somebody in like congressman massey. yeah. thomas bar, move our f k into the wall over to seed on the ticket and that could be the october surprise. wow. well, that's a fine kettle of pickles a maybe we'll pick that up with our next guest who's coming up next middle i have a fantastic weekend. okay. so don't go away because that's what we're going to do. let's keep talking. i'm us presidential politics. it's a fascinating subject, and by the way, everyone's talking about it right now. lots to chew on. as i say, he is the chair of the for the democratic league. his name is a lot of you on that stuff. and he is joining us right here. after the break, don't go away.

the the, what is part of the is it that the employee would post good. isn't the defense you of us and that in the word part, is it something deeper, more complex might be present? good. let's stop without glitches. let's go out of the a muscle americans. today, our armed forces joined our nato allies in air strikes against the serbian forces, the forgot yearly village spread through us with them. and we saw for we conclude, disregarding the fan base is of the nation, which is reinforced with the depleted uranium that has a special capacity to spend

a trade from nuclear safety point of view. there is no radiological or even and nothing is significant consequences. the, the symmetry seems endless. a real city of the dead, where it's very easy to get lost. similar graveyards now exist in iraq and afghanistan. they may soon appear in ukraine with thousands of square kilometers of already being contaminated with deadly dusk for the next 4 and a half 1000000000 years. the . all right, joining me now is ilario are messed over. he is a ph. d, a publisher and the human rights advocate certainly knows politics and that has been established in uh, florida politics for quite some time. um,

but you know what i was doing before i went on the air and a little bit this morning when i woke up, i started going through some of the polls. let me share with you what made silver is saying, right. and i know a lot of people think, mig silver is a grow other people think he's a more on but either way, the guys very prominent a lot of people read is, is forecast. it's called the 538 forecast if you want to go at home and check on it on yourself. he has harris winning all 7 swing states right now. he had trump winning before, but now he switched he's got, he's got our winning, arizona, georgia, michigan, nevada, north carolina, pennsylvania and wisconsin not by a ton, but cheese i had it all set and there's also a brand new quine. i called the just came out. let me, let me bring your attention to this one, the clinical, which again is a, a decent poll. they tend to interview democrats more than republicans, but still it's a decent pull. right? um they have her winning michigan 50 to 45. they have her winning pennsylvania of 51 to 45 and they have her winning, wisconsin by just a smidge. really. it's

a time $48.00 to $47.00. so you know, we were waiting for legitimate. 9 to, to chew on post debate, and we're starting to see the very 1st numbers that we can at least get a glimpse of what's going on. a lot of what, what is your take on some of these numbers that we've been talking about. this is, do you see as there seems to be a trend toward harris, a legitimate trend toward here as well. thank you for inviting me like we need to keep in mind that all depend on highly fickle voters and that many times people do not always are answer honestly when asking people, if we were to believe the polls in 2016 linton would have vendor of president and yet the polls demonstrated how all they can be.

we know that polls can be wrecked and the democracy in a free society, the only pulled accounts, obviously, election day. let me tell you why i love that. i'm going to tell you why i think this situation with comma la harris, and again this, this is not good news for mr. trump, but i got to call them is i see i'm not here to support either canada. the difference between the hillary clinton and donald trump is the following. when hillary clinton was running against donald trump, we had what you call a double negative, right? double. hey, the american people hated hillary clinton and the american people hated donald trump. so they had to choose between one of the candidates they did not like when the race was between bite and then trump. they had to choose between 2 people they hated. they didn't like, but they didn't like trump. for the 1st time we're seeing and pamela harris, and this is unique to her, even though she seems i don't want to use the word fake because it's not a nice word, but also i'll use that. she looks fake and all that other stuff,

but she's been performing very well. her popularity, unlike that of buttons, and i'm like that of hillary clinton's. her favorite abilities are very high for a presidential candidate these days. and i think that could be a differentiator when comparing her to hillary clinton. what do you say about that? you have a very point. um i wouldn't say fake, but she does come across as a dear. i apologize. i was, i didn't, i didn't mean to you. i didn't mean to use such a negative word, but go on, you know, but seriously, all these things, we cannot, we cannot underestimate the power of property. and the propaganda machine is in the hands of the democratic party. yeah. is there a by? yeah, the very power of the calendar, fake news network, cnn and, and all the other streaming media outlets that bombarded the american public

with heavy propaganda in favor of harris and people vote to feel. and they're trying to make the public feel comfortable with the errors as opposed to try points. been very from bitter in here. yeah. so he's helping me out, but he is the best thing to your point. you just made a very good point. he's better and he's helping them show her up by uh, some of the comments he's made that dower expression on his face when he goes on camera. some of the things he has said, some of the people he's chosen to put around them. if you are his strategist, what would you tell him? and i would tell him that he has to number one, make people feel comfortable with him because in spite of just being too assassination attempts, he is a stat submit, morally, morally speaking,

is assassinated 1000000 times a day in america. yeah. they just, they just haven't killed physically, but if they kill his reputation, they'd kill his good name. yeah, they kill him, ej and voters rely on those ephemeral things when making a decision. so on that that he's got to lay off the criticism. it cannot make insult as opposition. a campaign strategy? yeah, i mean, that was a very clear contrast between him and himself and his opponent. and he's had plenty of, you know, he should on immigration, he wins on immigration, but instead of moving into immigration and talking about the process, it tends to personalize it. and i don't think americans like that. i don't think americans are have a google, you know, they don't and not only that, but i think given most ardent supporters will tell you that they believe that he's

his own worst enemy. yeah. yeah. yeah. i think there's a, i think there's a lot of truth to that. let me ask you about manila made an interesting point. i think you were listening at the end of our conversation, said that she senses that there are people inside be, you know, through blue track, trump camp. who would like to see him get rid of j, the vance, because that marriage has not been a good one. uh thus far, what 1st of all, what do you think of the trump vance relationship and, and, and what do you think of the possibility that he could have an october surprise there, a picket was arranged in the back halls. it was arranged in public, and it was arranged for obvious reasons of political convict, not what's best for the country, or even what's best the republican party. however, that's changing the horses in the middle of the race breaks it. i,

i am very leary. i'm very um, hesitant that to think that that could be a good strategy. i'm. it shows witness in decision and of 4th site. um, however, mind seeing somebody like thomas the masks in there, but i don't think he would ever get approval. i don't remember, i read the trump's lawyers book and he said that what they did when they got them elected was brilliant because he owned the conversation. he always knew he would wake up in the morning and say, i'm going to say this today because i'm going to distract them. i'm going to get them talking about this. and they won't be some crazy thing. you didn't even attempt to do, but he knew they didn't get the media. he wouldn't be on the front page of every newspaper and the top story and every cable channel. he's not able to do that as well as he used to. in fact, she has done it better. the whole nation is talk thing about people leading tabs, which makes him not look good rather than him changing the conversation as he lost

that gift. is it just the wow, how would you, what's your reaction to that? i my reaction is that he's lost all sense of what's practical and what's going to work. talking about people leading cats blaming spic and nationalities or ethnic groups for that does such a way. is a very dumb thing to do. yeah. because even though it will good in some circles, generally speaking, people realize that if he can do with that group, he can do a group next. yeah, do you final question and i think maybe this the most important if you're him or if you were advising him, would you say you needed the bader again, make it happen? or would you say no don't debate or that he needs to be in or again, the problem is terrible debater and most likely he will lose the 2nd the he dropped the ball. the major question, sludge guys, are you great?

he asked them 3 times. do you want your grades to win, instead of answering correctly and saying yes, i want you crate them, but the people more army ukraine are, are mean you for it to lose? no one who wants you grade to when can so the slaughter of ukrainians. and i think, i think i really know you're right and in many ways is that's where vance i think is better at saying this is our money game. there are people becoming rich off of this situation? i don't a laundry operation. it's a money alondra existing, which is what he has said in the past, which is what he has, what, what trump has not been able to put in the right amount of words at this point. and maybe you're right. maybe he's lost a little bit of stuff. he's 79 years old, but there's still a long way to go. it's, it's, it's almost a testicle tie. it's still a statistical bye. so anything going to happen? we're just looking at the trends and we've had an opportunity to do that with you.

a lot of you and thank you for coming on and sharing your perspective. my pleasure, we appreciate it. all right, that's our show. remember to always look outside your own box truce. they don't live in boxes. i'm or should just be looking for you next to the, [000:00:00;00] the,

[000:00:00;00] the take a fresh look around. there's a life kaleidoscopic, isn't just a shifted reality distortion by power to vision with no real opinions. fixtures designed to simplify will confuse who really wants a better wills. and is it just as a chosen for you. fractured images,

presented as fast. can you see through their illusion going underground can the the uranium dust moves to new areas,

the number of combat veterans diagnosed with severe diseases of the handling uranium weapons continues to rise. and i saw a positive 3 tell yes, click on the vehicle, a stall, wanna add the left of the sloane puddle. i meant to eat the and then i go to and that it has to be in a school store. utilize over the m as what cloud name only i live. we need 6, we civilian about carl landscape. i need to stomach florida on the sum. they'll be like easiest. i looked for it for me. see any, let's get what i need. so. so the, the on or so soon i'm a state die easier side, but what have you? yes, that the yet please call my liza last day i did see my style over here in the post store. it said i will be a sit. i'm a sion of food and mountains lots uranium spares neither its victims, noise,

public choices over the 10 years following the war, more than 30000 nato soldiers. reports in yugoslavia develops cancer most what diagnosed with leukemia and brain to most according to various estimates between 10 and 18000 have died. the so called bulk of the syndrome continues to claim lives. but nato still denies the detrimental and thinks of depleted uranium from a this is new care safety point of view. there is no radiological significant to or even in the, or even in the significant consequences. it may be in some very specific cases. for example, people very near a blaze that showed up in heat with these kind of munitions they at the a z aerosols that could be done as