at the end of the 18th century, britain began the illegal opium frayed in china. this hard drugs causing addiction and literally destroying the human body became a gold mine for businessmen from the foggy l. b. on. however, the ruling chinese ging dynastee tried to resist and to stop the illegal trade which provoked the wrath of the london business community. in 1840 without a declaration of war, the english fleet began to seize and plunder chinese coastal boards. sobar lee arm dead for lead, train chinese army was unable to provide adequate resistance. the jing empire was forced to hand hong, gone over to england and open it sports for trading the legal good. in 1856, france and the united states joined in the robbery of china. the anglo french troops defeated the chinese occupied basie and committed an unprecedented robbery.

destroyed and blundered the wealth of the un making you one palace. the defeat of the jing dynasty and the dew opium wars fled to the transformation of this so less deal empire into a semi colony of european state. and started the age of humiliation. and the sale of opium took on collazo proportions and led to the horrible depths of millions of ordinary chinese. the hello and welcome to across the boards. were all things are considered on peter a little? can all warren balding the united states be averted in the middle east? also? why has the national security we unified around candidate come on? what harris? discuss these issues and more. i'm joined by my guess, george,

send me while we in budapest, he's a pod cast or the guy goal, which can be found on youtube and locals. and here in moscow, we prostitute dmitri ball, but he is the deputy for an editor. it comes to most guy a problem, the daily or a gentleman crossed up rules and effect. that means again, joe, anytime you want and i always appreciated. right. i would start out with george and buddhist as obviously the. and then one of the main issues confronting us all now is watching the defense on bullying in the middle east. and, you know, the question is a, what would it be even a greater or more? and i think maybe the question really should be is, why is the united states not stopping it? but i think that's really what's in play right now. go ahead. the data you have sitting right in the way you frame the question because we are going to ask, seemingly, on the brink of this uh, what type of stuff they will and admits the destructive war and the united states. just as seemingly ascending on his hands observing this and any effect,

collaborating with israel as to which targets it showed he showed him to his knowing him as we all know, that israel doesn't even listen to anything that the united states. so says, so we know that israel will unquestionably it back against the rounds of tags. um, of the last week. we know that israel will head back very hard. this will nobody just simply as symbolic attacks because clearly that was the, it will be, runs at tags. what damaging to the israel's reputation, particularly it's reputation reports of ms. field defense. um and then they would therefore we also know from iran that iran will not sit still for a um, for this. so he's really attacked and will in turn retaliate. so we've got a little making see here, of psycho over italy is just the wrong as

a major power. um, it probably is, uh, it's not a new clip up, but it's like it's a huge country is the $90000000.00 population. so where really is sitting on the brink of this, like a catastrophic war and it, israel, and particularly when they've been in this, in the yahoo, in, in recent days as a well as we're always fighting a war on 7 friends. so that's where we are, where you are 45, you know, who are and 7 friends. and there's no prospect the tool of any of this getting the results. and given the united states relationship with israel is united states is both more likely to get involved in one or more of these words know rekey them. and if it does get involved judges of why it's a war of choice, it's not the thought of necessity. that's what makes it even more bizarre, you know, demon, you know, obviously that are really damages that is being done to 11 on and it's people is broadening center in the news. but the genocide in gaza continues on out of the

baited. and a lot of commentators, particularly in the west, not only are biased in favor of israel, but they don't will. there's very little recognition admission that all of this could suddenly come to a stop. there was a ceasefire and gaza when you think about it. well where do again uh, one day during the day you the serial the terrible. com. i'll set that one of the several of the looked over to 1000. thank you. 3 of course. uh no i'm brushing is exclusions. the said that, that it was a terrible, terrible events. terrible gripe. i would say. however, there are many questions. how would that crap, you know? but why do you do israel? which now been destroyed every the don't catch block every the veto almost every day in the leadership or what, how much, you know, knowing besides the, wherever they are and all, you know, which a building that long term to, oh, who is really a miss? hundreds, sports people, you know,

using federal blades using bowls penetrate into is derek g at the board. it would not be a goal for 4 days or 4 days. that there was still a gap, is that bands, you know, and, and that, that the tribes to continue. so there are many questions can be off the beast and yep. and yeah, whole body. yeah. she is a label is actually a problem. do that to states. that's wrong. don't ask questions about the boss. so that's me one, let's do narrow it. you know, uh in gosh, no, there is no. do you mean just the destruction of the population, essentially in the image of the because we are on the, on the year on uh after the, the events of october 7. george mentioned netanyahu's made somewhat of a come back against all hans. i mean, you know, in here the alternative spear, everybody say he's told us these done, he's gone, he's not ok, and he's got binding around his finger. i mean, talk about a change of fortune. this is quite remarkable out this political a bit. you're a,

was a written, a little friend would surely, but everybody originally in the west, so really them like and very much because there's just the, you know, is just a little a little bit of strep or as they all great. well, we will get some really decent guy in his place on because i'm on the fundamental issues as the real difference between is really lead is um, cellular seller a little more likable than others. is just nothing i was on the tablet likable person. um. but yes, i mean, he is a venture he was written and then we're now seeing, particularly in the, off the mass of the attacks against the has, as ball or leaders will be the page here with tags. so that will control kids act. and then of course, the assassination of most or all of their fees that is seen it, israel as the hero, the hour that the tough guy security guy that he has always presented himself as.

and it's very hard to see that somehow he like his political demise because ultimately every one of the israel leaders would probably to pursue exactly the same policies as and it's in the adverb as not a remodeling is a, is a p scan to that. um, but probably not as effectively and as ruthlessly as and it's in the app. okay. so it's very likely that you will play any price. and so let's talk about the corruption, the, the it trials. and so, and i imagine he will live by with, with those things as well. so i did to say that, and that's in the other way. it's going to be around for quite some time. i mean, he's been around for read it at the top of his rated policies. so something like 30 years team and there's been a over the last few weeks. is that a lot of pipe? um, um by officials, russian officials a visiting to russian you're on,

we'll have some kind of security agreement which is very odd because for us it doesn't really do that with very many countries. um the, the russia obviously wants to be avoid being drawn into this. we know that the, the, the 2nd is rate, i'm sorry, uranium strike on israel and the russians were informed us that was where the americans and of course, the americans and born these railways. and i'm sure that kind of cooperation is going to continue. but just blowing a line to what george said, i mean, it is with bill, most likely as they can negatively, is going to strike back. but with the, the retaliation for the retaliation, i don't think around is going to signal its intentions again. they will tell the russians is the, is what to what the degree of would russia go in and defend and protect you around if things that sort of going sideways. go ahead demon. oh, well of course the political systems or russia and they're on a very different. and so there's just one thing that we start with. well, i go to,

that is the rejection. what was the west marriage? and the rejection to over uh, west and aggression. what's both a low congress, i was what the gorge has just said about in general, but probably with that, then you have why you with a is the best. why? she's because she is very cool. that's no use in existence contradicts the west. i'm never good because what, how with codes from the west of the last few days before and all that. yeah, you're on. is that there? oh, this is an unprovoked attack. it goes, but he's real. you know, we've heard that before. uh, russia's approval at the cookies to grade. these are believe the why you know, just look at your own use papers. oh, deal. last row i was problem is late and now i old rock courtyard. is my you crimea, will the 32. 0, take your narrow, is it so it's denied or use facts the in deem it to be fair. i mean,

around is not killing leaders in, in israel, or anywhere else in the world, even though it's called be, you know, the, the center of a level terrorism, georgia. well, i, i couldn't find it anywhere all the time here, a homeless here, but then in georgia with put you on the spot in the war. does expand the dues advantage as a defense for come out harris's, this is a, you could probably argue both sides. we can't go on both sides of the moon with. i tend to think that it read down stewart from save up to simply because they did. it seems that everything is spinning out of control. the bible harris leadership has been so weak and effective. and that is that if you continue with this, then you know, you know, world war 3 is guaranteed and the, so therefore, you know,

trump might bring border out of k all. so that's why it's at the moment, the 0, you never know the go. but if it war emergency good. uh, you know, we're down that higher. so say about that, but i, i tend to think that people just one of the boys to stop by the name america was the people's, the instinct is we don't want was we suddenly the one was that we get dragged into and they were going to get killed and destroyed. so a trump is more likely to bring with me as well as to an end than harris's here with the demon, and go to the contrary. and i know how to and george and of have talked about this before. you could, it can make an argument either way, one way or another. um, but um, i think the uh, the foreign policy lead to them they would, they have, they, they're not against an escalation here because as we talked on this program before, these people see solving all problems all at the same time. and, you know, is it, it sounds like lunacy, but for a lot of these people, this is the opportunity of a generation. go ahead dealer. oh oh, let's look what we have

a little from doing. i have to stay is what do the cage it is. uh, what does it mean for us now? one though on the radio you sure. trump says just that's something extremely stupid . like i'm up. i would know spoke of these ro, an you awful strong, but they can you clear? uh, you know, nuclear infrastructure, what was wrong? that's perfectly reasonable original. they do. that's all for was. but then we have a demo with iris who can use the same one. sarah, do you know like how many you who you are on is evil? so we support the israel. it is 5 basically of these 30 will assistant agents which isn't it was conducting the logical conclusion from a very briefly just picture of the world of evil that has been created through the last the last few decades. i mean, if you look at the image or what, what is the e?

well, you know, course dressing of the world. if you look at the media, i'm pretty different either one of the states and in the world. they say, these are just crazy. these pages, uh, usually it's of excuse for it. now they brush from the united states. i'm from uh is your be an hour away. oh, this person wrote in iraq or the bit you just crazy is very dangerous. so these are all, is this flow in the playbook said ok. we just have the, these, these will return, but peace, the thank you and it's the west that is out of control. not these the, let's dictate her is gentlemen, i'm going to jump in here. we're going to go to a short break, and after that short break, we'll get into a lot of special and some real and stay with archie. the look forward to talking to you all. that technology should work for people. a

robot must obey the orders given by human beings accept. we're such orders that conflict with the 1st law show you alignment of the patient. we should be very careful about our personal intelligence. the point obviously is to create a trust rather than to the job. i mean, with the artificial intelligence, we have somebody in the robot most protects his phone. existence was on the take a fresh look around his life. kaleidoscopic isn't just a shifted reality. distortion by power to division with no real opinions. fixtures designed to simplify will confuse, used to really was a vessel wills,

and is it just as a chosen few fractured images presented as 1st can you see through their illusion going underground? can the wells about the across that bullhorn design, peter developed. here we discuss the wheel is start and go back to you. it's really quite remarkable. um, over the last week we had uh $700.00 plus uh for the policy dignitaries from the intelligence community, etc, etc. i endorse kamala harris, which is really interesting. if you look at the list, george, it's the $700.00 plus people that have created the mess that the world is in right now. okay? and co harris is, is very happy to accept their endorsement here. i mean this, i mean,

as far as i think it's only 700 people. they're on the same list. they should all be indicted for war crimes, but not in the west. okay. these people are, oh, what are they called to be adults in the room? your thoughts story, sounds good. absolutely right. this, this, this we have is 700 the following policy, national security people the, the people who are the expertise of, of bud. well, the says and then you also have the, the comment i have is campaigning with the list cheney the, you know, the, and also of torture, the bombing of it just like every country on the planet. she's also enjoy the endorsement of dick cheney, and harris has proudly talented this endorsement the. now the training is that with us as a, you know how i feel they will level the bad feet,

but we weren't going to get into the stooping. was, wasn't, however, what he was counting bar of obama. oh no more stupid was, well, that's a whole lot along being uh, forgotten. but it is very interesting that you know what it is. this is the national security officials have against the trauma and the dmv. a i said earlier about trumps of you know, extraordinary comments about iran that yeah, yeah let's so it let's bump nuclear facility. those are those things that you want to bomb the. so what is it that they objective? well hope is the one plus and we're actually um, done at the time, suggest that it might be a good idea to negotiate. and that he has his own way unbroken with the consensus as he did in 2016. what was it that so offended the the foreign policy lead in 2016 is when he said white glove, we had good relations with russia that was very, very upsetting. and that was, that was never forgiven him for that. that, that he led to the whole a rush for collusion host. so even now he's a one person,

there was no, no one person who was suggest that, but one way that we could bring this war to an end is by getting on the phone and talking to moscow. and that still didn't know the, the, the official consensus of all the governments in, in the, in the west and the, all these 700 of national security officials is the way to win this war is the key bombing ukraine. keep your brain going, keep sending more and more money weapons left you grain of the beloved, the missile as wherever, the one that they need to bone moscow. then they need to be able to bomb moscow. and then of course, russia will magically come to the indigo shaping table and make all the jew concessions troubles in one of those same last may not be the way to go. i think that's kinda why this. so didn't feel already a bit of a with the drum. yeah, the entertainment for outside was looking in here. i think

a really good example is the, the, the single vice president vice presidential debate and where they differ on uh, guns, abortion, immigration, the education, you know, the usual boiler plate issues in american politics. but the 1st question of the debate, it was about the read and was candidates, vice presidential candidates came on more or less as foreign policy illiterate. and they did not even really address the question. the reason why i'm bringing this up is, and you can talk about all you want about them at a domestic politics ideological reasons for religious reasons for whatever reason. but just as charges say, but not foreign policy. and that's why we have this huge convergence. now there is no debate about foreign policy. you don't even what you really shouldn't even talk about it, go ahead dealer. oh well there's no debate broder because it is so embarrassing. i

mean, if, if we look at the situation that, that yahoo are indeed a door to those right. she has been and is ready for it to explore. all was 30 years and i was just 1996 people in the west coast. say the old you, it has to be in the russian politics far to, well, they forget the better the apple has been at least 4 years longer. simple integrated points and that's fine. we just really was still going to do. one question about the program is the death on your end, still in the car to dread through nights these and the or be you get it, the very dangerous is going shots. i mean the states and that you agreed to show what the story is. will you know, defeat trash, you feet iran or has block, but just don't get us into the mess that do it without doing your risk for us and the, and then you have, then you have with zillions be just go ahead and, and,

and they do what they want, they put the west in danger, and now they're sure that they will get away with, you know, how many another do logic those have been published about. yep. and yeah, just the wait nights you, she was beautified by that, you know, made them grasp on the message from cuba is not going to don't lose out. i am your boss. i am your blog. lead me. if you, you literally mean follow the same messages from there. yes, you invest. it's far too much to be if you, that's me, don't know the question, but why did you get all of these bits? so these people, he gets a big question or a lot of people say, oh, i just, i knew it was the last guy just bought this on the west. it's a big issue. who's quote new i bought it. i been thinking this is kind of people are talking about this and i, i didn't expect that we would do this, but george, i mean, this is the client relationship. i mean, it seems to be

a point of discussion right now. you know, you know, who leads the other, you know, the boy think about it, george is, it is just, it's not necessarily national security interest, but it's just kind of a mindset to see the world. we, they don't see. the difference is they, they may assume that the, my interest or your interest but, and much more of a kind of a messianic way and not necessarily security which you know, we have especially i think it's really dangerous. ok. doesn't there void of reality, but then i think, but it's the, this is a artificial come struggling. it goes leading home. i think it's much more a meeting of mind storage. no, i agree with the b to because when you think about israel is, are you other think of just think about the october the 7th. so tag. okay. it's accepted that israel will retaliate, but who to get married goes to anybody to think about a retaliation has to be proportionate. you know, the wage,

a war of complete annihilation. oh, well that's our response. and that's what this role does. whenever a israel is effect, immediately launches a completely disproportionate attack against the, its neighbors in wages this, this all and nothing more against its neighbors. because as you know, at any time anyone this, do, you know, strike israel, then of course, you know, it is be sort of has the right to do whatever a one so that any, any time with one son, no matter how destructive them, how absolutely insane. because, you know, is israel as existence as a state, which of course it isn't. and so yeah, in that and that is absolutely accepted, go throughout the west is that you have what is what has the right to do whatever you've ones voted in. what is security? it is a say no, no one of the cases, but no one else gets to do that. everyone else said, well, you have to make a proportion of response. you can just simply wipe the wipers state of the face of

the just because you was threatened on one day a year ago. and he is always this thing. the same goes through from the ukraine. it's just wireless. let's just keep this wall going. and he never occurs to anyone to say, well, how long, how many lines it was sacrificing for world to this gold, which is, this is ridiculous. ukraine's right to join nato. it says it was was who is lives for this ludicrous. the goal of ukraine's right to join nato, and that's all, that's the biggest thing. it was like, well, your grades into the ukraine, so run it that, that's all i mean, ukraine's right to join the hostile military lines. there is no such right, but that's, that's lucas, the mentality of the west and phone policy leads. why be got an entire generation of young men? it just, it just really explain your, you know, statement that they make me the kind of, um, continue with this point here. i mean,

particularly with israel, but i think it need can make somewhat the same argument when it comes to ukraine. is that when you look at the impersonal emotional investment domain, when you know, for a many american politicians have been conditioned over for, for decades now that an attack on israel's somewhat attack on the united states. and that's how they act. that's how they think. okay, no, of course the israelis want to know the bugs on they not only they see themselves as the 51st they, they might, may think of themselves as a 1st stage of 51 states. here. again, this is kind of a mentality and this mentality of squares with real interest or dislike with georgia saying, i mean, so you want to wipe out an entire generation of ukranian men to join a military and alliance really. i mean, i'm, i presumably, you know, if you'd stayed out of that would be alliance, you'd have a generation of young man, what's better, keep going email, go ahead. well, those the appropriate lives with the west and i d o g because of the defend in your

state defending your 30 years. okay. uh that's, that's nature. that's what they should have been doing since types anymore, but then slips. so for example, the office, can you really easily be avoid that? i mean, how did it stop the united states, just the, your being unit decided to use the opportunity. you know, you all know which will be in see the pro ration for some reason. the invalid, he was racing. ok, but they go to products, new de delusional. well, so they, they, they, uh, basically lost him. oh, the sign. know that the association agreement through, they knew she didn't confuse to sign the jeep off the phone and because she said no, she didn't have enough money to pay for it. so, so basically, uh, she became, uh, i'm to go with the southern part of your brain population. so they use it to boss you. and then you have a domino effect. uh, is there what possible times, you know,

the east of your brain stated basically the that could be expected. uh, also uh that will start with nato expansion. and even this is your predictive to that nature, especially with the war. and it will develop so dramatically. i that i was moseley, it's good to go into an old horse. and when the space of the you will start off in saying, oh, the 1st major war since 1945. how would it be possible? the same thing with the, with the be the waste. i mean, what do they need when they say we will do everything to protect israel? i want to destroy the congress. i want to start the nuclear war settlement, but run out of time here. but again, these are all wars of choice and dissembled someone. the power of stature has to say, no, i want to take my guess in budapest and here in moscow. and of course, what i think our viewers for watching us here are to use the next time. remember, festivals,

the, [000:00:00;00] the, if you think about russia, what does your mind picture the landscapes open up before your eyes? the last one does you imagine the

the discount starts, the journey, the, the you ready to come along? the is ready strikes rain down on 11 on throughout sunday night with thousands reported killed in the past 24 hours a grim anniversary. it's round locks. one good since the aux where the 7 homicide extensions across the regents the prime minister benjamin netanyahu, praises good progress made a year ago. we suffered a terrible blow in the past 12 months. we are changing the reality completely and we examine how that reality has changed with the people of gauze that the death