so he had the press conference with the major russian channels on this day and told us about the motives what made him start helping the russian army and russian civilians and ukrainian civilians. as well. for me is a war in ukraine is not as much of a cultural issue as it is for people in russia and ukraine, as it is a continuation of washington's battle with the rest of the world really and even with its own citizens. i see it as just america's attempt to contain and to repress russia in their attempt to be an equal player in the world. i see it as or where one size is fighting for justice and the other side is really just interested in their own financial and business interest.

really not interested in the wellbeing of their own citizens or of any of citizens anywhere or even in the welfare of their own soldiers. yeah, it's that some of them, it's something of the former russian president, the major measure that told me yesterday that ukraine's being used as a prophecy to fight russia. and now the e. u wants to try to use a georgia and mold over for the same. i guess the purpose of publication via nice. what on this boarder regence question, what with us is audience? the, the i think it, you know, when it comes to all these years of sanctions against russia,

for me on a personal level with the media this, i find the roots of photo big rhetoric to be the west. it's all cook top on kind of cooking mini shenanigans and crazy ideas. rush, just be getting sanctioned office so many years. and i, i me as a, as a former, as a form, a bridge resident, not now living in russia. and i'm just, i'm so glad i'm here because i see the way my government is treating this country the way it's treating me for simply working for all t. yeah, i, i spend years working in america. i work for the major american news network that i come to russia, the american said to me, you've defected to the communists. i mean, that's these kind of stupid, stupid comments here, but it's almost like this image. sure. almost childlike. added to the we get, you know, i was told of the guests recently the bricks conference in cars on and we was saying there's a severe lack of proper diplomacy in the world today. some people saying that the end of the day, the top guy, america, it shows us who it wants to speak to. and it's very good at saying you're either

with us or you're against us. is that how the leadership of the world achieves balance? do you think, is that how it should be mr. marietta? i mean, it comes to americans, always try to rule by reading crises on the planet less. this was the case. well, at least in the 20th century, and it continues that way in the 21st. that's something when the soviet union collapsed, americans felt that it had no equal at all after the soviet union and the worse on that of so the more crises decree, the better they think the situation for america about, well, they've created the crisis i made with the sanctions for what happens, it's all very simple about the americans make money. it was in america as always, feels good and it makes money from the weapons supplies. and by advocating money to us, defense industry would similarly sure enough, some of that money gets stolen by new crane or somewhere else. this must still, though it means that the defense industry and a lot of other economic mechanisms in the united states continue to work. you must see more over. a lot of businesses have been persuaded to move over to the united

states from europe. i look where it has become unprofitable to work for the law. that is, the americans are getting what they want and at the price of more blood can casually see what's going on. this is why americans are engaged in feeding the war. the for that system is coming to an end, newman. that's why they feel the world is falling out from under their feet and they're resisting it in every way possible. you mentioned grips here and there's also the seo as well as other regional unions a little bit. there are asian unions that are very important in today's world. and where america has no say at all or saying that it is seen as hostile there, even though those unions were not originally created as anti america. even though in fact i find the idea of the global self. and these kind of unions very promising . why the americans and their satellites keep seems that you are violating the rule based order shelves. but when you ask them what that order is and i deliberately picked through legal text and i studied them, it seemed comprehensible. you know, it's not clear what the order is and who approve data,

but it's really just an idea of the united states and the salary was well mostly in data. how best to do business in the world. if that's what's not a written document, you're not an international convention, but it's not a un act or any other act. it's not to you in charter with them. it's just something in order that they think that is right. and then once you're out of this order, you're a perpetrator. of course you, this is a very unstable system that isn't bound to collapse sooner or later or not. and those inside that system will suffer the most from this collaborative youth. i'm absolutely sure about that. and you wonder why this multi poto wells is taking root globally though? you mentioned brakes just a short time ago. this start summit in cars on beautiful diverse cars. on archie was the special coverage. more than half the world pay to shake hands and embrace russia and the russian president and some of my commentators, some of my guests who are joining us for the breaks conference. some of them

described it as the big bang moment. the future will look back on this event as the catalyst, the big buying moment, as the multi polar world really came into maturation wisdom. if you had a few thoughts about that and in music i initially got out of the window switch, a multi polar world is of course, much more sustainable than a uniform warranty. with a, you know, color world is always prone to war. and unfortunately, results in conflicts, which is what we're witnessing today is a multi paula world that implies making a connection between different poles, slavish. after all, it was this noble idea of the guided mankind when it created the united nations and 1945. it was so unfortunately, the resulting structure of proved to be in perfect and we put it mildly, but nevertheless, there was this idea of a world in balance as always, relatively stable. there was nato in the warsaw guy with the western block in the soviet union's block. so you're not talking about who is right and who is wrong or,

or which system was better, but it created a balance. so once that balance was upset, that was in united, so it resulted in conflicts more spam 0 in many regions, and so on. but the more so now we are witnessing the emergency of a new world order new the brick summit. and kasan was a great success for both the russian federation to the end president posted up. so this was the 1st time that so many a prominent countries representing in fact, the global majority of british reconvene to discuss issues they consider pressing over us. or there are matters, you have to be resolved. for example, the most incessant talk of everyone being tired of a dollar worst. people say setup with a domination of a dollars. but it's an obvious thing. everyone understands this because the world cannot function like having only one dominant reserve current, especially since this courtesy is issued by me of loans that was all countries and provide to the us economy it sooner or later this bubble burst. it will make a bang, so loud if we don't produce such a terrible explosion better,

i'll put it plainly. it could have very dire consequences for every one of the i'll tell you more, which and probably no one is interested in seeing the dollar store. it's not even us because it will recon having some of the international economic relations and we are part of the international economic relationship of the soviet union didn't care who is isolated by the whatever happening. well, not completely isolated the florida. but nevertheless, it was an isolated system with this issue, and now we are, all part of the system is that we all realize that we are dependent 1st of all and the dollar goes in on a certain number of other reserve currencies to humanity. yep. so the reserve currency basket must be expand addition to that, of course you are should be electronic money. digital money is the future because it is impossible to manage it from one issue in the center drawing. there are no gods. the people who work there either in washington or london, or in brussels or by they are not gods if they are people who make mistakes, movies, or economies that can decline or grow and digital currencies are after all the

future. so i'm saying is because it is also on the current agenda both and many other issues will still have to be discussed, both within bricks and other regional organizations as a new. but it is inevitable, even if it is not to someone's like anything that i think you make a very good point. so that all that has been weaponized as being politicized as being used now to corral countries into behaving and being good boys and good girl . so it's no wonder that this multi poto, well this looking to diversify away from that dollar and more power to them to just quickly touching down on ukraine for a moment. so the country that sometimes you refer to it is country 404. and your rhetoric on the conflicts and ukraine has been a very straightforward, almost quite refreshing, frankly, compared to the heart gashes. and that comes out of west and politicians these days . i've been very grateful to, to read your comments rate on your posts, on you, on ukraine. but despite what the western media and political landscape says, is that lensky is no longer

a legitimate president. his time expired many months ago. and yet the international community, what should i say, the west and g 7 community, they continued to deal with that skill though he's not a legitimate president. um that being said, i wanted to ask, just if i may, the special ministry operation, it's ongoing. if it had ended, let's say a year or so ago, we wouldn't have learned all these things we've learned about the west and it's things in ukraine, bio labs, bio weapons labs, the black market of illegal weapons, trade, money laundering as you, as well. and yet meantime the u. k says for example, we will support ukraine for the next 100 years. why at the, i don't the thought show me a good will. uh, this is exactly what i'm talking about by supporting and conflict in a foreign state. more than one can quite effectively manage their own affairs. everyone understands where this money is going because it is being used to continue

the more it's a more which is claiming many human life. i won't go to the reasons for this war, the russian perspective as well. no to, let's see what we could have come to an agreement, but the west chose and then a tire lead different passage because it in this is essentially a moxy war involving the entire western world against russia broke. see what? yes, indeed, at the head of the state, or shall we say, what's left of it is an illegitimate figure representing a group of people who se has power in the country are ignoring their own parliament and acting in their own interests. what are these interest? they are very simple and what 1st and foremost it's about stain and power, like any new authority brought to power by a new light on is likely to start by executing those who ran the country from bank of a street before them done more over. they can simply say everything that was signed by this individual and a dirty printing t shirt is the his last legitimacy and what his laws are invalid and we will comply with them. everything that was spent was done so against the will of the people

that huge amount of money was stolen. so we will just prosecute them because it will create a more just government. it doesn't matter who will be a good on that. because therefore zaleski and his team and a primary task is to stay in power for as long as possible, as long as they are in power, they are alive. as soon as they are out of power, they cease to exist in y'all's best because we'll end up in poland or london. and their 2nd task is to line their pockets as mcdaniel and saddles. that may sound because we all understand how the vast amounts of money is as low in into ukraine's budget. not to mention the weapon supplies are being spent. a huge portion of these funds, this investment that there's little oversight during wartime switching and especially in the state like ukraine giving units. bobby's any oversight that exist is very indirect, give to west degrees to supply them with additional funds just to pro long this conflict on the other. the only goal pursued by the western world, the us and nato, is to we can rush it as much as possible of meeting with me so that we can't even raise our head was so that we know our playlists and you much so that we understand

who is in charge in our early home, that is the goal. that's why the continue allocating these funds, as for the amount we will assume we and, you know, it's, it's, it's interesting if you know, let's say you don't know. let's just say you are an imaginary country and you're going to start a, a will with another country. what do you do? you start a propaganda. this information campaign send in the n g o's to foment unrest, bringing more propaganda. then you start sanctioning of the country before you're going to have a will over the country. you need a public with sanctions. no one is surviving on the most sanctions in the russian federation, but russia isn't just devising and wisdom idea that brochure is driving these days . the economy is growing faster than germany. russia is fost. moving forward. europe is being left. it's getting down to drink these days and yet pollutants said, for years, your sanctions will. boom. all right. do you think any one was listening to

buff? well, putting his right foot, these sanctions have come back to bite them. the thing is western leaders. both american and european have completely distorted ideas about russians. economy, it was from i clearly remember a brock obama's phrase and i worked with him quite a lot. i remember what he said after the 1st sanctions in 2014, the fits and rushes economy is in tatters in your field. what just ideological past? dream peer fabrication, but i see rush as economy kept growing. even that 1st round of sanctions helped us become completely self sufficient in food production, we used to buy some things in the west, but now we're not only self sufficient, but also feed many other countries because some of what about the current situation, rushes economy hasn't just data flow is growing, but it's growing partly due to industrial expansion of the for both in the military sector is like no point in hiding that and in the civilian sector that has a strong everything is fine and developing for these sanctions have boomerang back

to euro and they've exposed in europe's weakness the weakness of europe as an economic institute. i mentioned this earlier today over to the united states as developing and achieving it, goals, americans are and as always, i mean, successfully economically. europe, however, is stagnating, almost in all countries. there are in a very difficult situation. i'm not even just talking about germany, which is transformed from a prosperous economy into another. god knows what we do and there's no way out of this because our former partners now so called on friendly countries have back themselves into a corner. they've declared, we won't take anything from russia, no energy resources, nothing else but, and everything started going downhill for them. yeah. there are no miracles as much . they have to make choices. and they prioritize their legions to the united states over the wellbeing of their own citizens. obviously, if we use historical terms, it's a relationship of sincerity and vassals. the relationship between europe as of ass

or, and the united states as this area and commands everything. but european economies are losing too. european citizens are getting poor extra. they understand all of this perfectly well that the, so soon, obviously lots of different political processes will begin in europe. so you can already see this and who's coming to power in europe. pragmatic leaders are replacing those who are obsessed with ideological ties to the western yesenia understood. and you look at the north stream pipeline sabotage. that wasn't just a russian pipeline. that was our russo, europe, and pipeline australia, switzerland fronts. they will spending big money on this. it's always been cheap, russian energy that's been fueling the european economy and when you cry and kicked off, as you well know, you're upset. no more cheap russian energy be con, have any money going to proved? and so the cutoff russian energy, then they find themselves without any energy. so america says we're going to sell you our american l, n g for 4 or 56 times the price. and you are going on to mr. madrid if you are,

is time king these days, i mean, i may see one day who's washington naturally fighting. is it fighting russia, or is it fight in europe? because you've got to be careful who your friends up. if i buy just quickly, russia has ratified a security contract with north korea. it is now signing a type of security agreement with 10. ron, why do you think the steps are being made? i don't want to sound like a broken record, but on my job, it all to you international. i always say that we wouldn't be seeing big moves being made on the global geo political chessboard. is that perhaps how you could phrase it, but it's in the shopping of an investigating the position on the chessboard is changing all the time that i am each side is trying to calculate the moves of the other side. why it is trying to guess what blackwood do and vice versa, bill, and therefore there are times when you can improve your position in some situations . so if you'll be facing is ex weighing budgets or current opponents that have the same reasoning model. they think that they have the right to supply any weapons to ukraine or, or to send their military advisors or share the location of the russian military

facilities, which basically their own specialist will target missile strikes me. and so in essence, this is an admission of then a war is being wasted in structure that yes and even though i've used this word in the interview of course, but actually it's no longer a proxy warranty. it's just a warm lead, but it's a real war. because however, when russia concludes an agreement with some party about providing services, mediation, or protecting mutual interests, for example, with a democratic people's republic of korea, they know the prompts something up here. so the indignation get the well, let's start with the fact that even before that we had a treaty with the pure case in place on mutual assistance in friendship and support in certain situations of them. and now the new treat in the sense that in the event of a military attack, i won't be immediate consultations in various supports, including possible military support that was part of the previous treatment. and that remains in force and the new one, right. the more so all these provisions have to be interpreted directly, or literally in legal terms, say i'm action be, gets counter action, is it?

the western world thinks it can be friends with everyone against russia. but that gives us the right to be friends with other countries against the west of world. and this is perfectly normal. what i would do is no matter how much they say that these countries are not good, our countries are good despite they're made up report of learning and you go at the moment. unfortunately, we don't emphasize unfortunately, of the federal western countries, western europe. of course, the united states of america and other western countries of canada as trillion and a number of others of len you are the enemies of the russian federation. that it's their own choice as i see. and it's very deplorable because time heals, everything within all wars come to an end. but relations between nations, unfortunately, take a major hit afterwards and i'll say this, well, maybe it's a simple thing. but after the end of the 2nd world war, like people in the soviet union going handed germans for obvious reasons, they thought that they were invaders murders and they brought us creek destruction

and death to our soil. and it took decades before we were back on good terms with germany schmidt. this was perhaps thanks to those who came to power in germany in the 1970s. willie brant, i'm how much schmidt and other source of the credit also goes to hourly nursing. you mind, but why does it happen with this hatred is a little bit faded to my memory. yeah, you have to understand that this attitude towards the americans, the british continental europe. the spider and close ties are christian civilization is our shared history even will linger for a long time to put in all the good stuff with sacrifice to the alternate, but for what we could, you can just money. so sad, interesting point that it wasn't that long ago, the us state department was, it was complaining, the 2 thirds of the world refused to join these and see russia sanctions. and that was the guy in the state of, i'm gonna say, you know what, what's, what's wrong with you guys? what's wrong with you guys? well, there's nothing wrong with the well, it's just, i think had enough so much of the world has had enough of the status quote. but when it comes to the status quo, oh, mr. madrid if,

what is it gonna be in the next few weeks over the next few months in america? the election is days away. the camelot, if it's pamela wins. how do you think of russia in the international community? what would be a look? i mean, let's, let's be honest, mate, or the least from my point. i haven't seen her with any domestic policy making track record at all. i can't even imagine what she knows about foreign affairs. i mean, i'm sorry, i missed maybe a death, but it is come on the winds. house rush, i couldn't prepared for that. no, i see a well rush of the soviet union and the russian empire existed won't different us presidents with offers. so we shouldn't overestimate their influence on global processing. they do hold a lot of sway, but they're not gods has ruled the world that you missed at the end of the day. we don't really care if it's come all that we're donald, for absolutely sincere. when we say it's up to the american ones as they need to make this choice up. however, i must say, and i agree with you that there is

a difference. and it's not even in the candidates of attitudes towards russia, especially given the fact that their positions can be self contradictory and accomplished. for example, trump just said that he killed the north stream pipeline and whatnot. we get that if there's a presidential campaign going on. so they have to make provocative comments and so on. yeah. and he makes them all the time. yeah. furnishing, among other things, his own image tricky, but you know, all the american president them, let me, let me paraphrase that one. non mainstream politicians him can become a us president. trump is the least mainstream of all mainstream politicians because he's never worked for the government. and yet he's still part of the main street. that's why he's not going to do anything so that could be frowned upon by what's known as the deep state updates. i'm not talking about some kind of conspiracy. i'm talking about the way that works. they are very influential. politicians are in business people. i think bankers, etc, so can have a major influence on the current development. as a result, it's always going to be a main stream figure at the helm of the us. whatever who's or her name is. one

could be more on orthodox. another one could have less experience and still there's a difference. let me explain it. see if the new president ardently pours the fire of the russian ukrainian conflict with it. it would be a very bad policy because this would be a road to help me. this would really be a road to world war 3, and there's a, both of these candidates must be aware of that has to be that mr. trump, who's been in the presidency and should have an idea about how these things work, or kamala harris, who shall we say, doesn't have much experience and gets criticized because of a lot of work. however, she has worked as vice president to whoever makes decisions that will help for track this war is going to make a very dangerous and stake watching a bus much. do you think regardless of trust regardless of kind of a level godless of any of the night? do you think the cycle deep state is interested in world war 3? most thing up? i don't think so. you must be a complete moron to say that we need world war 3 because, you know,

deep state can survive world war 3. it is only strong because the us as strong as a large, powerful country is a thriving economy of america has many different virtues of luck, but if the entire world is going to collapse life on the planet and it comes unsustainable, no deep state will you be able to survive. what will they do? they're in their bunkers, look out the window. as radioactive snow falls from above. i don't think that's an anyone's interested then you see the blood. they still made a miscalculation, since they are not as of right as time they are, pardon me, how to sions, of a slightly different caliber. for some reason they think that russians will never cross a certain line life while they are wrong. good. if it comes down to the existence of our state, just as the president of this country has repeatedly said, that as well as your humble servant and others, naturally, we will simply have no choice on a foot. every person who assumes the office of president of a nuclear power essentially takes on this obligation to say, i need to defend the country to the last man. what this applies to the russian

federation as well means in this case, it seems to me that the current political establishment, both in the united states, in your letter, you lack the documents and subtlety of minds. so the subtlety of reasoning the kissinger had, for example, unfortunately, contemporary politicians like shots, but trying to know where that ursula, the head of the commission, the ever changing british find ministers, no offense. but i will say what i think they are not of the same caliber as their predecessors. i guess i could see this now, silvio berlusconi once told me in his stomach, he's gone now. so it's no big deal of i said in dublin when he looked at it with sadness and said the glittery look, these people are not capable of making decisions. and if they are certainly not churchill, like they're not the goals, they're not the german leaders in the postwar generation issue. they cannot be compared with the topic. but the most prominent presidents in the united states of america political also had this understanding that the political classes would generate. i grew up, the technocrats are coming in and they do not understand how politics function is.

that's a disaster. but the, the, the, the r o t r t, formerly known as russia today trying to influence the presidential election in november. the extraordinary new efforts to once again infiltrate our election and undermine democracy. 2, will 5 proceeds to direct this information in propaganda here to sort of divide american r t as move beyond functioning fact or. okay, then do you want to know who i pick was this time? and make sure you turn in for all the special coverage of the us presidential and

that the cause i know it's pretty nice to someone that just didn't want to say this for the best interest you are. you see, for me under the guise of evacuation about 50000 people were transported the the main purpose of this concentration camp in federal rules was doing think prisoners was time for us and

use them as a human shield against the advancing soviet ami giving mind but feeling slipped into phone, we put them in the phone with us in the plugin for the shipping and stuff like that, but don't want to put in your name. you know, i'm so sorry i missed cuz that your certificate seems to put your salary and as a c c, 's use people as biological weapons leaving them to perish without food. most the most shelter. feed your small answer from your dating so couldn't they knew who lives i usually use most of the can you put the nation weight in there? should i just put each is really strip for them to move the cam gloucester 10 days or what else made it drastically defense from other camps of the 3rd rice watch on t. the

russian states. never as one of the most sense community best most i'll send send up the send. the 65 to 5 must be the one else calls question about this, even though we will then in the european union, the kremlin media mission, the state on the russia scooting and split the r t sports net, keeping our video agency roughly all the band on youtube, the payment services for the question, did you say a request for check the,

the headline philadelphia to national washington's crying, filed again over. so golden russian meddling planning. the video showing fraud and audi voting of the presidential election. the role of part of coast efforts to divide the nation. i'm lazy is 5 minutes. it says he's rejected a cold from the us secretary of state to stuff of friend lee ties with russia, highlighting his nation is independent. polls with the program were speaking exclusively with russia, former presidents to be treatment for you that last bad. how the west conduct since the business of it tries to for the political agenda on the world committee comes, the americans always try to really like reading crises and.