the, the, [000:00:00;00] the welcome to cross style global ins were all things are considered on to your level. the moment of truth has arrived. what will be the outcome of the us presidential election? well, either side, except the result. and what are the form policy implications across sucking these issues and more, i'm joined by my guess, jordan, samuel, we in budapest, he's a pod cast where the goggles, which can be found on youtube and locals. and here in moscow we have to meet the bob, which is deputy for an editor. it comes to most guy a problem, the daily or a gentleman, cross up rules and effect. that means can jump any time you want. and i always appreciated by let's kick it off with george in budapest. well,

we're down to the wire and mine reflections on this campaign. it was kind of whimsical. queen g. i'm a good dose of humor. i must admit, i'm only on one side. the liberals are not funny anymore. they can't last night. certainly can't laugh at themselves. but, you know, in in toto george, it was a campaign by the leads most of the leads against one man. it wasn't democrats versus republicans. that was about one man. again, we saw and this is the 3rd election we've had about one man and we're down to the wire. it looks like the trump has some wind to in his sails. we'll see. so certainly comfortable, harris turned out to be a complete dug. but when you have institutional power behind you, that can be enough. george, a good agree will it be that um, because this is,

this is indeed the 3rd consecutive election in which the democrats, the media, the political establishment that secured this state. everybody just piled on to attack donald trump and to seek to do whatever i can and it's about to prevent him from becoming president's own work and women. the in the a in 2016 was complete. absolutely disgraceful hoax. russia gate folks, but which no one has paid any prize, then we have in 2020 the eps of the cover up of the home to buy a new laptop which would have been damaging to other bite and campaign. and now we have the survey. i go to the attempt to present him as the reincarnation of idol template is the person who we americans have been familiar with when was 50 years. uh, you know, a very popular uh, reality tv shows the uh,

real estate mobile growth in gambling. uh, mobile, whatever. suddenly he turns out to be at all tape low, so that is whatever they can in the house. but the 2 things that one would have to keep in mind as we go into the election night, which is i think that clearly the polls are indicating the trump is doing a lot better than he was doing in 2016 or 2020. i mean by glenn. he was behind the full of the goals in the national goals and the battle ground because he was behind everywhere. he has never been ahead. here he seems to be at the very least, the even, or the, even the head of the combo, the higher is that would indicate that he, that literally, that he's doing a lot better and even been those previous selections. they were very close. when he won one closely, he'd been when the other one was a very close, but this time be, you know, you see it's even and so they would suggest this. he's going to win this one quite comfortably. now the thing to keep in mind is that there is no way that the 10 with

credits is hit, the political security establishment is going to allow him to do it. i mean, we just know there's that they've got to do whatever they can to prevent this from happening. you know, it's a game and george and i have had extensive convers of extensive conversations on this. and i've been basically got it come to the conclusion. it doesn't really matter who wins on tuesday or thursday, or saturday, or next month, depending on how the ballots are counted. but it's good to be the reaction to the outcome. and i think that's what is on the minds of a lot of people because they, you know, we, it wasn't political tardies, it was tribes, this is tribal. now this is tribal warfare and it's all going to kick into gear after the result. because as like i said in my introduction, i will the other side accept the outcome. go ahead the way that you're absolutely right down the i will go over the long the time scale. you know,

what was the news papers? the 2 part? yes. maybe miles apart, they don't want because it, but they both have better deals. i don't think if the other side will it will be the end of it at a fault. this is the, the, it's amazing. you know, the, the full or is ation of society. why do you to type them? so why explanation is that the labor folks s like paul uh, uh that i do. what would you know the campbell surround getting terry's and by the most of the european politicians, ultra liberals own lost us in greek and control overseas in craig and conflicts that strife. you know, a lot of people in the mind. yes. 1000 says that basically pod yes i gauge and so much like each other in the, in the west of the come to the conservative strong labor you do in the, in the, in breeds of for example,

i bought some co op liberals managed to create the whole thing out of nothing, you know cool in russia, ukraine, the both the person that h or monday ever in the ninety's, it was the west which could be the which supported the stream is nationally as the new queen solely the, it became a liberal life from there you know, people like, you know, they charl, uh, all these issue in the same way in the united states. okay. to the 1970 is about these from sexual spends down the well, there was a, you call them these people just where they're, you know, i know it's a huge issue. you know, people are ready to queue in charlotte because of that issue. so uh these uh, these uh, uh, the author, liberals the, uh, the blinds or the walls in the quote. and we were in europe and the former soviet

union. and it finally came to the states also. so i predict that neither side, we would set the results of the selection, and you're absolutely right. the real game will stop off cuz a lot lot during the day that to, you know, to actually be live there. you know, we could of the, under the post mortem o ha, beasley include what were the inflection points and i suppose we can point to a number of them. but the, the bike will garbage comments and really kinds assemble sums up one side looks at the other. i may have missed it, but i don't see the right using that kind of language. that doesn't mean they don't use course language. it doesn't mean they don't use offensive language, but just calling mean garbage. is it pretty well universally understood word. ok and nobody wants to be it. all right. and i think that that kind of sums it up and it is a kind of by prelude to cold the,

the election is going to be received once the ballots have been counted. a good, i think that's right. and i think this goes back really, why does this the trump, the trump campaign arouse so much rage and so much hatred and fury? and i think it does go back to the question of it leads. really have been afraid for quite a long time of popular and popular anger over the way the economy has been handled . i mean, there's no loop became 1000 age crash, which does a game. there's been no real reckoning as we get on how that came about them. the people paid a price for it. so we've had the, you know, this mass migration and the for risk take effect, but this has have, once the site is throughout the west, who did this, why was this done? why was no one ever really informed about this? um and then now we have these was and it goes to the, the industrialization of these ongoing things. and then how the leads respond to

this popular ango. remember barrack obama, elizabeth, remember that he was a nobody that in 2008, he starts talking about people cleaning to the guns and the bibles. and he was lucky of those that he was up against this nightmare. creech and john became and then it goes with hillary clinton with a, you know, the top of his trump support is uh you don't belong to the boss, get the floor of those. and now we have bite and talking about the garbage. and i think that it does reflect the leads view, all the go over the, to the mass is you know, that they get to close it who know who, who is a, why does a complaint and there, you know, we, we know much better than they do what needs to be done? and i do think that that's really why what whatever comes in in office trunk does pose a threat to uh, to the stablish. well that you have a name. what do you do with that? i think that means it's a sense ability because i agree with everything you're saying, but because the middle class has been essentially decimated,

we have and right its thorn wars again. but they would rather talk about people being garbage and deplorable. it doesn't talk about the court issues. i mean they're, they're, it's, it's fighting over virtue signaling. okay. i mean, i think that's why a lot of people are buried in becoming more and more dissolution, particularly minorities in the democratic party. but are you done for me lately, you know, and this goes to the d mentioned, the issue that you often bring up on this program is it's very high. be a logical, it's really to can. it's the demand to control a narrative, but not necessarily outcomes for average people to your up. so the right, the all kinds wherever is going to be bad. uh well the reason which george hasn't mentioned there is no wreckage. i mean, uh these people use us or what the boat is, you know that, that we get uh when the, uh, west mesquite size our, and actually we say what about what, what happens in mo,

door where you're basically still on the west, directly the serious, the that's what about uh, the fact that the my, the so called really lucian was actually a wildwood police support that uh by the direct presence of us officials and your be in officials think, you know, imagine you would have protest marches in washington and someone role from the ground in which term there, you know, uh well someone thrilled before the new street that would have been a huge scandal about the americans to allow this to themselves. so what it says there is no reckoning seems there is always these. let's move on acreage you with this problem. you know, uh, the mazda is deal uh, you solutions and left, left alone. uh, and, uh, uh, for i zation is based, uh, what you just described. you know, the 2 sides wondering each of the garbage,

huge and all sides. okay. as of abusive language. yeah. what's the, what is barry wice? so is the really table, scary things. i've taken a small book during the last 2 months to assist you nation attempts against a lot of the candidates for president by the way. uh, you have basically a total of lead you electro system. uh, you have things that have triggered the revolution just a few years ago. no, this is all except the, this is a, you know, this less one that you of the, as you have prevailed. and that's what is scary before was uh uh i'm is look if car is comes to fall, what is the chance or was it that your brand new alternate and the plan will fit will land was the west stop supporting the dictatorship with you? the jobs is almost 0 because the 1st question to harris, if she accepts some part of

a deal with russia would be what have you been doing during the us doing default years? where did the oldest boot 100 premium, right? yeah, that's what it is because you know, we're going to continue talking about foreign policy and when we mature higher gentleman we're, i'm going to jump in this, we're going to go to a short break. and after that short break, we'll continue our discussion on some real new stay with our team.

the of the, at the end of the 18th century, great britain began to conquer and colonize australia. from the very beginning of the british penetration to the continent, natives were subjected to severe violence and deliberate extra patient. according to modern historians, in the 1st 140 years, there were at least 270 massacres of local depot. any resistance to the british was answered with double cruelty. hundreds of natives were killed for the murder of one settler. indigenous australians were not considered complete people. no wild beast of the forest was ever hunted down with such unsparing perseverance as they are. men, women,

and children are shot when ever they can be met with squatter. henry myrick wrote in a letter to his family in england, in $1846.00 plus strategy as bad as these rightly described as blood soaked and races. if at the beginning of colonization, there were one and a half 1000000 indigenous people living on the continent, then by the beginning of the 20th century, their number had degrees still 100000 people. despite the indisputable historical facts, the problem of full recognition of the crimes of white australians against aborigines has not been resolved so far. the welcome back across black bullhorn design, peter little. hey, we're discussing some real news. all right, so i'm gonna go back to georgia, daemon, hardy, touched upon and let's talk about foreign policy. this is a bit of a quandary here because, you know, we have a centrally as cold war 2 point oh,

focused against russian. we have a proxy war that started under the obama made ministration were biden was vice president, trump paid his bite, his role as well, are mainly ukrainian regime. and then we have biden with full blown proxy, more of which has gotten extremely dangerous. now they're obviously in the indications that there is more critique for the donor class and the last within ukraine. obviously the casualty rate is kind of running out of min material and left hand. and by all accounts, even a friendly media towards the village landscape, reaching low morale. but what does that mean when, if trouble comes in or harris comes and explain to me, what could be the difference or what new or is it just really part of the campaign? as well, i think that some harris will almost certainly pursue the dividing policy. i think

she will continue of funding this war. i don't think she has any real ideas. i think she will just simply accept that kind of foreign policy establishment military establishment. the point of view is you might even escalate, you might even sign off on things that bite in the seemed hesitant to sign off on, such as lifting or restrictions on the use of long range missiles on russian territory. trumpets, i think a more interesting case because, you know, if we go back to what he really believes, i mean, in order to go back date of that could enter in 2000 when he 1st contemplated running for president k. as boys be like games of conflict with russia this, you know, although some of the beginning he saw that this was nato was a real waste of money and a waste of time for the united states. 2016. he was clearly identified the trying that it is a real problem. it makes a lot of sense for us to wage war against russia, even

a proxy war against russia. when china, it will be the major beneficiary. and you, you'll have to think that that's what he's going to come in with. he's gonna, if he wants to endless more. because china has to be the focus of america. so it concerns? nope, that's a, it's a different questions as to whether he be able to pull this off. but i think that's going to be his, his initial goal, the, to bring this war to a as a speedy and as possible. if however, he fails to do that, then i can see him going the other way, which is the mass of escalation. so it's very unpredictable, but at least with trump, there is a slight hope that is going to just they take the bull by. i don't want to just say right click, but let me just do whatever is necessary to bring this through it. open the media, the conclusion. it's interesting that you mentioned china because even from pre politics was, well, part b on china a whole of the time. i mean,

it was really one of the 1st major public figures. not, not, not a political figure, but a public figure to me to talk about that the money. and it was a recent interview. i think it was of the last new cycle where a trump lamented how close russia in china is gotten. and that goes with george just said that he, that's, that's the, that's the price for him. and that is, may be the origin 0. we want it would, it would be good to get along with russia from 2016. unfortunately, we have russia gate in between, i think it's almost an impossibility that he can go down the truck. i mean, there's so many avenue is closed off or next to the bank candidates when it comes to the national security state. beemer. uh, well indeed look a little while is probably should piece clear it's wrong, but you're absolutely right. yep. you know, george was absolutely right. what would feel? okay, why does be want to uh,

does she pretend to want to have the conflict between your brand and russia? in order to concentrate on china, so just thought a lot at hybrid. what with china ro we have, what would probably want to know long this promotion piece even if it's, let's dredge, you know, i think the, the power is, comes to follow up. she can law resolve the quote for it in ukraine because. busy she is, i'm sort of, she's a corporate, you know, she was bought at least fully apart or by don't support. do you see which led to the school like and we invested by to be sponsored for more than 2 years. so she could not turn it back on with a 0 again, the night, the stage during the looks that into, into a corner, united states to north america, east. and what happens with these, uh, uh, with these page are there? well, how full of books you may need to because is the 1st use of how this quote would

devices. yeah, well, it's, it's, it's something like that, you know, a weapons or chemical weapons. suddenly, every long becomes a wall of, uh, you know, a developer, a boat to do it, a sutherland, terrible death around the globe. because now we see that these, these can be used decades to once again it's very much right then, but welcome to the body. the other states has a, you know, they already, uh, they already, uh, invented, truly, truly mates about your green. uh they, they connect the ukraine to modules they, if you want idea a logical investment to leave as well. so uh, basically they did use the radio, would you both and your brain and it is what it is called the sunk cost fallacy. that's exactly are exactly right. you know, charge on the margins and, but of course right now in american politics, it be what the do, walk away party do awfully margins matter

a lot. and for some it's really quite interesting. we look at pennsylvania, michigan, wisconsin, minnesota. get aside is on the ballot for for many um, um, um muslims here and eric americans who knows that could flip the whole script. i mean, the more you look at it, it least potentially it's there and that will have implications possibly. and then maybe you have to hope guys last, then you will see when genocide is on the ballot, you better pay attention to the electric. i'm, i'm looking, you might have future trump administration. i may be, you know, hollowing in the woods here, but we'll find out if it makes a difference. george. so i think that's right. i mean, is they, would we make these calculations um, for, to night? it's looking like um, trump will carry the sun belt states, so it's all going to be down to the 3 blue wall states, the great blake states,

michigan, pennsylvania, wisconsin. the calculation is if tropics, off one of them, the trunk is president. if harris wins, all 3 then have is as present. now, all of the 3 left focusing very much on pennsylvania. but michigan could be the, the, the, the sleep. but that because it's, this is a very significant, there's a very significant most of them, an arab american population in michigan. they've already made the ceilings blame the very upset about the, the biting the ministration. now the democrats have been saying that, oh, well, but trump would be was that's always that go to argument. oh yeah, yeah. when, when you may know of like what vitamin iris did, but trump would be was. but that's not a convincing argument because as a patrol was it was, you know, we have 4 years of trunk and we didn't have anything like this in the executive churches. it's like saying, you know, this person is committed murder, but this,

this guy might commit murder. i mean, i was, yeah, i'm sorry. i mean by 22 people, not just one person you'd like deal to that exact the, that's the argument. and it's not a very convincing argument, and that's why the, you know, number of these, um, yeah, most of them in the arab leaders have come out to, in support of trump. and they were in may, will be a game, a very rational calculation. the trump could just come in and bring this to, and that's really, it doesn't really need, you know, who is a, a pack and zion is money is not running around with got office to be a lane is only a guy who is down. he doesn't need maria models to name or either either he's involved. so he might come in and say enough already. you're going to be, he doesn't have any particular attachment to israel. i mean it's, it's was always a kind of trends, actual thing. you need the money because it's been very short of money compared to the demographics. so once is involved, it's quite possible that he might rethink this and think about his story. the

legacy is the bringing piece to the movies because he's never gonna remember the fact that brock obama gotten a nobel peace prize and he didn't. okay. the demo. um, you can talk about the american presidential politics. it'd be there for the 3rd cycle now without talking about russia. so when he's rushing meddling in this time around in the election, maybe is obvious here, of course of joking. but, you know, x now goes, you rushed to see this election. do they have a dog in this fight or every single president is the same when it comes to american foreign policy towards russia? oh, i think a is a part of that huge, huge, disappointing development that we have seen. so i think they didn't a to, so there was really huge jobs to uh, resolve the conflict between russia and do that to states russia and you were there was

a lot of goodwill on the side. no rush. it's amazing how rushed to people despise the table. probably because we were isolate the west, the media when you know the full school, a truck that exists in the united states and europe. and even then use the eastern your against us. we would be, would have driven over back the world. and the in the lived, yes. any, the thousands, it seemed to russians that the v is actually a re, is you know, what, it was a very, really 4020 dish. and when she helped the 9th of states, you know, gave us the 1000 well, after the $91130.00 is that that's what portion of it look like. very, very, really school support them. now, if we support them in, you know, guess what? they're going to see, well, hold on people that they have much was a name is the last, you know, look at these a, these from is various. so what they did to washington and 2 dogs. and what was

amazing was that the americans, at least they're making the lead, you know, just that, you know, they, they, they present, they, the portal can be something continued for the same for see, disregarding they were wanting to know the single russia could be that the respect to do, but this is not a single sir. uh, but the security for what's the rush, it's insurance is much great. the security against the cartridge, which we're all really connected to. but there is, but they're actually inside the united states. several of these congress out of beach to us likes. so uh well, little by little wasn't patients by little, by little becoming more and more disappointed. but they're still russians who for some kind of change as the main cool, because a diplomatic solution. well, the ukraine impulse, that is there is what the majority of the i've already set it on this program hope dies last. okay. right. this is our last program before the presidential election.

i'm sure next time the 3 of us be we'll be talking about the implications if they bought, if, if they're not, i haven't stopped counting ballots, but that is in 2 weeks time. we'll see. all right, gentlemen, i'm going to take my guess in budapest and in moscow. it of course of what i think our viewers for watching us. c a r t c unix. i'm and remember across the works the are all t r t, formerly known as russia today, trying to influence the presidential election in november to extraordinary new efforts to once again, infiltrate our election and undermine democracy. 2 will 5 to see, to direct this information and propaganda here to sort of side america as archie has moved beyond functioning fact or. okay, then do you want to know who, what pay clause this time and make sure you turn in for all the special coverage of

the us presidential election? the or our family is one of many families across squan who's assessed our lands were taken from them after world war 2, around 2 thirds of the island was actually seized by the us after the war. we are domestically a part of the united states, right. we, we, we operate within the system of government, but we are not privy to negotiations with other government entities being knighted states. us never really acknowledge the fact that we are a colonial people. national security has never been about us. it's national security is about securing american infrared, and this was about security we would be so occupied were actually targets

the board of political lines as us selection day. as is closer, we explore how long time party loyalists are helping the fence commit to shifting value. it's not america as a political landscape. also ahead. we wrote a joint collateral cooling and old countries to stop selling weapons and ammunition to these rail we forwarded. the slider which has 50 for signature is that the country is back in circus initiative for global arms embargo and israel as offer our calls on the you want to take urgent action on middle eastern conflict with lowest and votes counted. and then we'll dive in. presidential election