common ground the donald trump will be the next president of the united states just minutes ago the republican candidate exceeded the all important 270 electoral college, both threshold earlier the funds to supporters, a promise of a new golden age for america. i want to thank the american people for the extraordinary honor of things. 4749, the president elect supporters celebrates, come a law risk consuls, her election night dress, sending the parties representative to dress supporters and so you won't hear

from the vice president tonight. but you will hear from her tomorrow, she will be back here tomorrow to address that only the a 2 family 2 addresses support is for to address the nation, the welcome to the r t international news hour. this november, the 6th and unit of the next president of the united states is donald trump. again, the republican candidate has just passed the critical threshold in the electoral college votes between democrats, pamela, hardest. in a storming victory, he will officially become leader of the country in january for, for the

to well, the critical figure for a candidate to take the white house was 270 electoral college votes on trump has not surpassed it, sitting on 277, he had suspected to go past the 300 mark as well with some ease. not the mark was passed as he told me, it is in the key swing states either securing or currently leading in all 7. because of that, most of the celebrations could be seen in trump's headquarters inside supporters earlier in the evening and stated his intention, quote, was not to start pours, but to end the victory that our country is never seen before and nothing like this. i want to thank the american people for the extraordinary honor of being 47 president. 40

well, i tell you what the news lines keep getting better for the republicans in congress . they've already secured the senate and look to have retained the house of representatives as well, meaning the party will have a clean sweep of the 3 branches of u. s. government. and us drug scored one victory after another over harvest incumbent vice president's move from the 1st supporters of plane to see the democratic nominee even cancel to our election not address at howard university in the capital, sending a party representative to address backers since the so you won't hear from the vice president tonight, but you will hear from her tomorrow. she will be back here tomorrow to address that only the h u family. not only to the dresser, supporters, but to address the nation. so thank you. we believe in you may god bless you

make a g u a g o h u n g o her room. thank you. oh, well, no more wars that was among the pleasures made by donald trump. in his victory speech, the supporters in florida, you know, we had no wars for years. we had no wars except we defeated isis. we defeated isis in record time, but we had no wars. they said she will start a war. i'm not going to sort of work with the stuff wars or the democrats are of course sol, king as are the main stream media. because right now we have exit, poll data that shows that transform. for example, a majority of latino voters in pennsylvania and majority of young voters in michigan and majority of latino men in north carolina. and he all bowed his support among african americans in the state of wisconsin. so we're talking about the core demographic of the democrats who are often to choose republicans instead. so of

course, this has never happened before and bought it shows is that the democrats were really banking on identity politics all along and it has really shown that it backfired majorly. so we've known all along with that american voters were really concerned about the economy. there was a gallup poll in october, for example, and it shows up the number one issue for american motors is the economy billions going to ukraine and so is really something that frustrated voters, they wanted their presence of focus on domestic issues 1st, then there was another paul, that was conducted by fox news, the motor analysis, and i came out there were asking the voters who had just castro ballad, what they were concerned about. and so what was the 70 percent believe that the country is on the wrong track now? who put it on this track, it was the why didn't and harris team, of course. so we're really seeing a huge and when it comes to support for the democrats is really losing its appeal. and right now we're also seeing

a user not only in terms of support for the democrats diminishing, but in terms of what people are saying about donald trump. in particular right now i'm talking about a british official sorting with the u. k. 4 and secretary, david ly, me who congratulate us, donald trump. but we all of course, remember what he and the other put us officials have to say about him before. trump is not only a woman hating neo nazi sympathising sociopath. he's also a profound threat to the international order that is being the foundation of western progress for so long. he's a racist, he's a sexist, he's a home a fault. and it's very important, particularly when you've got a special relationship that you treat them as a best make it my best made was a racist, or sexist or a home, a fault by to call him out. and i'd explain to him why those views are wrong. so there you so it yourself, how just a few years and how the statements are starting to change is interesting though, because the mainstream media in america,

it seems like they've learned nothing since 2016 how they've been responding. well, we're seeing right now that they're trying to figure out what went wrong. why does come le harris lose so well? lose? we're saying that because that's what i suppose are showing. and it seems that right now they're resorting to trash talking, trump, which we'll get to in the 2nd and blaming show by then why are they blame and joe by them because they're saying, well, he's the one he should have shopped out earlier. well, and that's what makes the timing, i think of president biden's decision to step down after the debate. something that if she does in fact was, will be under a microscope. because of course, there was so much discussion even over the summer about potentially having an open primary. donald trump has been running for 2 years. pamela harris has been running for a 170107 days. so one of my big questions is, particularly with her candidacy, is whether that was just enough time to introduce herself. well,

it is true because her association would show by them, of course, didn't do her any favors because actually she was his vice president during the time when his disapproval rating doubled, to 58 percent. and also one journalist for asking her questions to answer what she did agree with them. so by then she couldn't say anything also when they asked. so what would you do differently? again, this should could an answer. and if we look at her media appearances compared to don't know, tom who went and gave an interview seems to pretty much everyone, and some of his interviews lasted as long as 3 hours. then you'll have campbell, i have is fairly given any interviews. and when she did, they were all very stage consoled by her time pain. so that's something that people didn't like, and they feel that the didn't get an essence of who she was and what's the difference to jo by them. so people who are frustrated with the job, i didn't didn't see what they would get different from her. and now of course we have the mainstream media, like i said, sole king hand trash talking from that kind of extreme sort of extremist right wing

fascist type government in florida. does that make it a more attractive place you're talking about the propaganda campaign and the playbook of trump? this is not new, this is not surprising. this is directly out of hitler's playbook. this is out of an an autocrat playbook. this is a way to mean that the things that trump has done masterfully, frankly, is to get the entire, you know, to get a big part of the population to believe that the games rate. and to so this trust in public institutions and a free press, you know, we're going to, there's been a lot of concern about levels of division, the newest society and potential violence in the wake of the election that i really have to say. i think that the media is to blame for that as well as given the rhetoric of you know, calling from hitler and worse than hitler, a fascist, insane literal democracy is at stake. but, but do you think that this violence will actually materialize?

well, we are seeing experts saying that it seems to be a sort of powder tech situation of why? because we saw security funds thing, for example, going up around several places in washington. this d. c, for example, around the white house around the us capital, including as well a couple of harris, his residence in washington dc. and all of this was even before the results started coming out. so that indicates that they are concerned that there could be violence and unrest coming up as soon as the results are official. also we know that for example, that pro ukrainian activists who tried to killed donald trump. i'm talking about ryan wesley. ruth, of course he's accused of trying to assassinate him to september. well, he apparently in the jail house letter, he alleged that donald trump's victory would plunge the country into a civil war. does he know something? does he not? does he have other people who are like minded and are planning to create trouble? let's see when the election results are officially in. well,

that's across to international security, consulting and commentator. earl rozmini's, sitting live from washington, dc, or many sites for your time. donald trump is returning to the oval office by all the time she's blown. horace. art of the water, your initial reaction to what was it 9, it's just the about 20 minutes or so that a pass that crucial threshold in the electoral college. well, i think this was the what i think is it, it's, it's a positive move, i think for, to address a lot of issues. the country is dealing with the economy, one relations, the immigration. and they'll be people that disagree with with me there but, but it's also is very much of a surprise that i think it's, it's a store come back and then we've never is that we've seen only once before in our history with grover cleveland coming back to it in another,

not successive terms. so this is a kind of in store come back plus if you look at the media, the media was selling me negative against him. and yet he overcame that and it looks quite substantially. and it's not just the electoral college. we're, we're talking over 3000000 boats and the popular votes ahead as well. so it's a very, very positive movement. i think, uh, and then you also see the house and the senate looked like you're going to go republican. so this is, it won't be an interesting direction after after, after everything flushes out. yeah, the senate has gone read. we expect the house of representatives to follow suit. meaning that it would be all 3 branches of government under the g o. p controlled with that in mind, or we've heard repeatedly, donald trump saying that he, he end wars. this is going to be one of his priority in terms of foreign policy. when it comes to, to military support for ukraine is realize, well,

do you see much changes are how, how will a congress on the president trump approach that from john you're reducing? yeah, i think bob, we still have a split mason and a lot of things and there's a lot of influential powers that behind the scenes and within the government itself . i know his intention, i mean, he hit he personally, i think is against intervention. and really wants to stop the killing. can he do that? there's a lot of forces that are going to be tugging a targeting around here. so let's hope for the best on that. um, but the, but i don't know how much, how much we're going to see and different immediately, at least on the, on the form policy from. uh there's just too much uh, too much background pulling that's going on both, at least with him. even getting this, such of us a support as well as the both houses that may give us one more positive movement in

that direction. is that just to carve into that a little bit? is that the, the machinery around in the background that someone called at the blob, others called at the deep state? how powerful is that compared to, to, to where trump could be in january? how, how does that work? it's very powerful and, and you've got the democratic party that's very, very anti uh against trump. and this is probably a very, very bitter loss for them. um the, and then you remember you got the military industrial complex in the scenes here as well. you've got the europeans who have invested in this quite heavily. you've got to a lot of companies that have put a lot of investment into a, into ukraine as well, and they are looking for a come back. so how this, how the does this, what type of negotiations go on, you know,

are the russians willing to go, you go through negotiations. there's a lot of trust that's been burned over the last 3 to 4 years. i remember in the into yeah, earlier, and you don't remember as well as me, 2016 and russia essentially getting the blame for a hillary clinton's at the feet by the, the democrats at least that's being debunk sense. but do you do for see any similar kind of excuses being made this time the victory looks quite big. but in the build up to the election, moscow was mentioned quite a lot of the courts that although there's no, uh no evidence we heard all over the place that it was the russian meddling of russian distant formation. or, you know, the, the term it likely rushing this information and then of course there was no evidence them. and you can see very little of that. but yeah, will light. will it try to blame man and try to twist it?

most likely. will it be as bad as a i think the rest of game situation back in 2016. so let's hope not the other going to be challenges to the, to the vocal. absolutely. but um yeah, i, i, i don't think there's as much, you know, here there we had a huge investment by the clinton campaign to fabricate the documents and information and, and, and release it out. so i don't see that happening this time. so we'll see. we'll see what happens that and if that and at least maybe he will be able to follow the up. and he's got some interesting people around. it depends who he puts on his staff. you know, if he puts new times like he did last time. oh, but dropped but he's got uh, he's got kennedy out there. he's got tulsa gabbert is got some other people that are very aware of the situation. the both on the political side as well as form

policy and have a more open uh look and and so we'll see who gets around some sales was form policy team and where it goes at just that's thoughts. do you think? and in some corner of the, the west wing at joe biden, the sitting shipping a single most thinking i told you, you should have stuck with me. would he have done better than pamela hearts? i think you probably want to, um, although you definitely was in a, in a, you know, cartoon to decline. um, people like to go by. they know like, uh, camilla, her harris and she really for tray or so doing anything is vice president um, a joe may have uh, actually may have been a better candidate if they stuck out, stuck with him all the way through. uh, you know, um, people may have doubted him and things like that and its capability but, but he,

uh, he has much more experience in a foreign policy area. he has more experience in politics. so maybe people would, you know, been more open despite his age and as far as physical challenges right now. but um, uh, yeah, i think he probably would have, uh, would have done better. but there was in fighting as we all know, going on in the democratic party, behind the scenes. and essentially we had him internal to that occurred at fascinating as always. but there we have at that will be a president trump from 2025 and the next 4 years early. i hope you speak again soon . thanks so much for your take on this or a roger. it's an international security consulted lives on our as well. just to point, i'd say official official election results haven't yet been released. but even before that foreign leaders, political figures were lining up to congratulate donald trump on is victory. a

message from equity was president and was one of the 1st followed by the austrian on gary and turkish, serbian leaders bruncess of money on a crone. i chimed in to ad. he's already worked with mr. trump, while his government speaker plan that you're most quote, take charge of its own destiny will take apart without means later. the nato secretary general ukraine. this one here is a lead ski where a fast to follow suit both saying they're counting on continued cooperation. many questions on that, isn't there? well, even the european commission president are sort of underlying such warm, who graduations, despite your comments to the boss. thing him, there's been a bit of that going on. and the new british prime minister at praise, mr. comes victory. saying that's the, the you can, us are ready to defend it. now what he called freedom, the democracy, an enterprise. while these really prime minister benjamin netanyahu put a cordial message describing the election results of the history is great as coming

back. and his relationship with donald trump is of true friendship, more a hesitant, and so we say from beijing, when us, the weather and congratulations would be sent to china so that it will continue the approach of peaceful coexistence without commenting on the election direct. because i don't think that a child that has any preference post say of who is going to be in the white house because it's a, it's a choice off with the american people. but when it comes to china, us relations, i believe china no longer has any on expected expectations because the fact is packed and the us has taken a john, uh, as the major competitor or right, right. uh, in uh, you know, global economic activities. so i think china is going to be quite

cautious in hensley relations ways the us because our 2 countries, economies are into low button by nature. every country has the right to make their own country great. all great again. so yes, but i only hope that you know, whatever the president trump is going to do as the new president of america. it's not going to, you know, to bring any chaos to the rest of the world. because we all want peace. and we all hope that the transition or the change of the association in america in the white house is going to be smooth and peaceful because as the most powerful country in the world today, whatever that is happening in america is to be watched closely and does have an impact to the rest of the world. yeah,

that's returned to washington dc. another great guess to talk through developments with it's marie, i'm more the former aide to i've done this done is national security advisor who joins us. you are indeed most welcome. so there we have it not very long ago that the 270 threshold being met. so donald trump at look set to become president of the united states again from january for more years of mr. trump, what was the reaction be in, in the middle east? that's large defect? well, 1st i would like to say that this was a major compact for, uh, president trump, for him to lead and key swing states and surpassing the required 270 votes. now when you're looking at what's going to happen and potential changes globally, i think under the trump administration, there's going to be a significant shift in global security, which is going to affect the middle east. and trump has expired. express intention

to re negotiated rapid solutions to complex and gaza, which is extremely important. and though the feasibility of such outcomes remain uncertain. his approach may involve reducing, use the military commitments abroad and re evaluating alliances which could lead to changes in the international dynamics. but he is a big supporter of ridgeville all, all the same. so can you actually hunger having them to do that? he's, you know, he, he's anything but them predictable. how do you feel about an an bolden trump presidency? yeah, congress control by the republicans. he can do what he wants. now that appears well, the, currently you have the senate, that's one of the rad. we're still waiting on house votes. now the 1st and most

important to trump is going to be what's happening domestically now when you're focusing on international aspect. so you have to understand that what he says should be taken very lightly because he's not the one that's going to be executing decisions. we are well aware, especially in the past on how he felt on certain countries, including afghanistan in the beginning of his presidential election, then how the climate had change was due to the people that were surrounding him. so he executes decision based on the aids or advisors that are surrounding him. so based on the individuals that are heavily influenced, having to influence him, that's how we'll know. and those individuals are going to be appointed later on and will know which direction trump is going to be heading. but there are a lot of republicans who have said in the bills up that when it comes to ukraine conflict, for instance, the endless supply of funds to p. f without any,

any great success to talk of any real and outcome that they can get there. the return on from the tax peer money that that is going to at be questioned. do you think that will happen as well? based on my experience with trumps policies in international countries, i'm gonna refer to afghanistan. so this was something that he consistently advocated for leaving afghanistan, but that's not what he executed. so what he says and what the party says is one thing and what, who are the decision makers at that time is another. i don't believe that they are going to completely isolate ukraine and i think that there is not going to be a cut of funding any time soon. we also understand that republicans are heavily invested in international security. so there isn't much supporters might

not be happy with the here that well, i think many of the supporters are also you also invested in international security . many of the explanation commentary that we've heard during the election is pretty much commentary of what voters wants to hear. we have seen that throughout decades that there's one thing that they informed before voters on. and one thing that they were saying it was a different thing on how they're executing. you do get a feeling the impact of get us down when trump was running for president. he was saying one thing, but he was doing another thing when he was in power am on camella horace. her supports and just seems to have collapsed. and those keys swing states including michigan were and the red tightens in areas with quite a size. but most of them population who i think felt less done by her when it comes to gas. it because it appeared she was saying one things to as really,

is really supporters. others to are the americans is not how you see it, that she just couldn't get a piece of message and didn't want to wanted to play both sides of the fence. well, that's the thing that's in there and narrative that has worked with democrats in the past. now the democrat campaign has face several obstacles. this includes economic concerns of voter turnout, issues, challenges and key battlefield states. now harris's decision to cancel her speech and acknowledge these difficulties. i mean an explanation is going to have it as anticipated to address these challenges. now, i don't think that this was the on, this was the highlight that you're mentioning that swung in the republican favor. i think people who are voting in united states are more concerned of what's happening in united states than what cala harris or trump is saying in regards to

international issues. because economic issues was the number one vote or drive in the united states just to another point just away from, from foreign policy for a minute. you know, he 78. donald trump and joe biden is over a t a as well. and there's many questions about whether he was actually at the wheel for the last year or so himself did events looks very capable at looks to have great support. could he be the one driving policy wise trump is the front month going forward and how would that likely change the, the administration, the trump administration? well, i don't think age has anything to do with the mental capability of individuals executing certain decisions, especially when we see what trump he's quite had strong. um, and however,

how he's managed it in making certain policy decisions. of course, your inner circle has an influence on that and, and amongst other factors. and especially coming from the kind of culture that i come from. we take age as experience and to a certain aspect of respect it how the party and how his colleagues take it and whether it's advantage. there have advantages and disadvantages. of course, all ages do you have a younger person who has a disadvantage to experience? you have an older person who as a disadvantage to being able to execute or be having questioning their capabilities . oh, what we understand is that democrats were sitting administration and they have loss by

a major vote not only by popular but electoral. in addition to this, you have seen the dislike of how the administration has been handling it's policies . so i think what the republicans know is that they're going to stand united versus how the democrats were not. and how they move forward and execute decisions is going to be something worthwhile watching. okay, well thanks so much for coming in the program and sharing your thoughts on the button use that donald trump has passed that crucial threshold then will be the next president of the united states. maria ward act for a to have gone. this done is national security advisor. thank you for now as we just the way the final 9 spent in the us presidential election party is the place to be all the big developments as they emerge. you'll find right here on or along the line because the.