this is what she, what, what she was new to mind. this is a very important subjects and adds release as to the previous issue, a, i, it's development and it's time to use. and there are several aspects to this matter . we're going to start with the use of snow in the engine activity, and that should certainly be founded upon solving algorithms. this is something we have to aspire to. this was secondly, that, i mean this is that there's more on the pulse of the government agency, but it's very difficult. it's possible, but sure it's going to be counter productive. if we try to prohibit everything, you know, looks and then as the government chooses this past and brush of the friction professional community, it has arrived as an understanding on the rules for doing the business in the internet. and this professional community has assumed a food and several independently develop the self restrictions,

trying to prevent any destructive influence upon society, especially on young audiences. i think this kind of self regulation is one of the views. it's one of the ways to ensure the interest of uh, the majority, but of course the internet has to comply with domestic legislation of the country. it's been operated in, make sure that it's evident to moving that said many products we uh for a month witnessing the new relation of information. unfortunately, this does happen, but i would like to reiterate, but you know, if the thing is the internet says that complies with domestic legislation with the system and it should be the case. and then this will allow us to minimize

these differently potential negative consequences. i do understand the technological difficulties and restrictions, it's going to be a total. but if we choose this past thinking excellent himself, which is composite, engaging with the professional community that sees where the sets might be coming from for society, then it's going to be the wait for the professional community to address those threats on its own. but of course, the government should be willing to lend a helping hand position for such countries as russia in india. this is a task that can be addressed. we have very good top notch specialist. this is an expensive good, very good schools of mathematics. i mean, we go to the needs of people in these come who have a proven to be lead us in this field. well beginning even if the company's on all

she had liter. ready they themselves, as experts have raised to prominence in the field. so we've got everything we need, especially in such countries as india and restaurant. now as fully near the payment system that you have mentioned to you, to an extent it's been a success. it's where it can its functioning, it could function even better, and it could be expanded if it had been no positive or show that is pushing the way. but even though these battery is being built, made a payment system is developing and we're going to replicate the success, the issue of the internet on the issue. you know, it's as it has become a permanent fixture of our discussions. you, you said that the internet was created. how's it probably good. somebody's just the benefit of humanity and well, of course my leg was built for other purposes in the very beginning. but at

a certain point in time, that's a goes through. information change should include way to and if we've got to make sure that our activities in the internet, just as any other type of human activity should be in compliance with moral and legal requirements. exclusive technologically is not always easily achievable, but it can be done. society has to protect itself against destructive interests, but at the same time because we've got to ensure a free exchange of information. and we also have to make sure that it benefits the development of countries and the international community at large. and we and russia are going to pursue this path. i know india follow suit and we, i gave him to work together on the subject. i don't thank you for paying so much attention to this issue. but of course, it's impossible to overlook this matter or not. to work on that. so i wish you

every success mister president. do you use the internet yourselves if they meet you? well, you know, i'm a very novice user. i can press some buttons to look something up. so if you do happen to do that question too much louder systems, yes. your systems by see very good. thank you. that is it gone? selection by the use of mobile. we have spoken in detail about the environment, the stage of well to fast in terms of the climate i'm as soon as their food i would like to give the fuel to a good friend of us. mr. wesley dunn, mac, a raj from south africa. he's going to speak on the subject. thank you very much mister president, also for updating us that, but i like to confuse street continuous itself. yeah, environmental problems, as you mentioned as well, cannot be solved separately from retracing global inequality. problems of the world meet your logical organization, the international width of what a recent sleep note to the human cause. climate change has resulted in widespread

and rapid changes. the most fear ocean crisis, via empires, via the 2023, was the warmest on record by large margin with widespread, extreme weather this tree, and continued into the 1st half of 24 and continues. according to the w. m. all the sciences, kia, we are off track from achieving cycled climate goals, the impacts of climate change and it has a dis with reversing development for games and threatening the wellbeing of people in planet greenhouse gases and global temperatures through record level and the emissions gap between aspiration and reality remains high. the colonial and imperial phases of globalization lots the established, the current 12 systems. and they essentially premised,

as mentioned by you in various parts of your update up on an equal exchanges between the global north global south o as really famous the global minority and the global majority. so i'm a products he company and associates working at london school calculate to the global north extracts rule materials, land energy and labor with approximately $10800000.00 us $1.20. it's just that number could have ended the extreme poverty 70 times ofa between 1990 and for 2015 that 25 year period. the cumulative drain front of the global cell was approximately $242.00 trillion us dollars. it's a abundant kick. the on equal exchange is a significant driver of global inequality and even development. and ecological

breakdown was his heroic struggles for national liberation, challenges that speaks of colonial imperial subjugation. the institutional app rate is established off to the 2nd world war, or the great patriarchy cool stuff. to maintain the hedge and many of the global not. and specifically the advantages of the g 7. the global. 19 pandemic. expose the structural flaws, you know, international system. while reminding us, as you have mentioned as well, that no one is safe unless we are all safe. our collective scientific and technological competences, however generated rapid solutions that helped us save lives. notwithstanding, we are gain witnessing attempts to whip the nice intellectual property systems through restrictions on how knowledge just shit and against the transfer of

technologies. these must be collectively resisted and condemned all countries should we should see why the deep, a cooperation and collaboration to accelerate the co construction of knowledge to enable just strong decisions from the and sustainability of big stretch to exploitation without receiving the benefits of this value. addition, if it's at reforming institute international institutions that continue to facilitate the process of financial exchange. however, that generates more and more frustration and despair even as acknowledged recency. but a few successful 16, the big something in cars that this was from the secretary general of to you in the current international financial architecture is outdated, ineffective, and unfair. this was a quote even recently from just to the west of us in

a global policy for them in german, which determined that these institutions have failed in their mission to prevent and mitigate crisis. and to mobilize the fiction financing for internationally of treat development goals. outcome and security can only be enhanced by active lead, reducing these inequalities in world systems and actively promoting knowledge sharing. ensuring isn't put to vote opportunities for the development of all of their own this by saying a very survival is address. should we fail to match all rhetoric with all actual practices and the resources to support all countries facing increased environmental degradation, climate change, and ecological criticality. enduring piece could be a collateral benefit of such a progressive transformation. thank you very much. can

you send it to jim we send you most certainly the subjects that you have broached just in the course of your discussions is this, the 6 lady gave him his just know with your colleagues here of the felt i club of most of our nation independently and one of the main slave doing eventually, avenues for research, even though it's a different folder how to manage. she's not getting into detailed right now. no. am i getting to discuss what is happening and the reasons for that? well, yes, we understand that there is a global roaming. we're not going to discuss what of that is happening due to the new. so i'll put you in, you can give it use of maybe there are other influences coming from space. maybe

there are some cycles in the history of us, but the evidence for climate change is the climate change is happening and it would be wrong. not to do anything we english. i know full well this is happening because in russia the woman is happening just not have thoughts to paste them to anywhere across the world. over the last 15. yes, we have registered at point 5 degrees increase across russia and in the arctic it's been a point 7 degrees and you know, 60 percent of our territory asp on the frost. so like elizabeth, it has some practical implications for us just because we have cities and towns and settlements and the plan, the frost, and there are pretty decorative capacities deployed over there. so this woman is going to have

a serious implications for us. so we're well aware of what is happening incidentally, and they some we've, we've got one of the greenest energy mixes across the world from 40 percent of our energy to you. and then i get the sort of consensus. definitely getting a comes from natural gas issue at the, you know, we also have nuclear capacity is $200.00 pounds of which being canceled in the accounts for 85 percent of the energy mix. and these are low emissions sources of energy. this is one of the greenest energy mixers across the world. another 20 percent a, a solve the only for us are in russia. so we have a very big absorbing capacity as well. and we are keeping that in mind. we have plans to that and we've probably and now these plans we have set the tag what our target site in terms of which emissions reductions and you know,

those who are most vociferous, there's a huge a few in that field. i'm regrettably doing. why do of us just because we just had an example, the co pays generation in europe has grown just recently. everyone in europe was saying that cove should be faced out. but quite the country rather than shutting that down. they have good back to code generation. paradoxical as it may seem, it's a fact maybe it's been done on to some of the main job, political notions but tend to happen now is pushing them. but you know, you have spoken about the artificial barriers in the way of developing because of the development of developing nations as tides towards the environmental agenda. as usual, there are these green barriers that several countries of building, i mean developed countries are building these green very useful,

relevant markets. no, we install new. this is just another tools they have come up with to constrain the development of new confused, cuz i put you in a very well he's getting if you uh, so can send me an agreement about what time of change then teach us. and so yeah, from that can said, and then you ask them to provide with those countries who are willing to embark on the same problem with the sources of funding to provide them with the technology they require. addition to, to manage in a way to transition from 5 profitably to these technologies without suffering losses with different otherwise they would be, i can be high, you know, with the progress bandwagon and people within the week if not otherwise, they absolutely opt in saying that if you do you mind that we should concession to clean technologies right now? is a good, easy was you are the ones to ask for new to the atmosphere. and right now you do mind that we should make leap water and you'd straight to it's clean

generation with, but how are we supposed to do that? or should we less than an hour or less died? we just spend on technology, we suppose to buy from you and we have to pay you for this is yet another instrument of new colonial estimate of the rights gave people a chance to live and develop if you are sincere with that, if you think that everyone thinks as to think about the time of change, then you have to provide the countries that need that with sources of funding and technology rather than trying to prevent this uh, transfer of technology is i think this is what you were alluding when you spoke to somebody and i agree with you, i can tell you fully and the same goes for you. i've done the financial system. i've spoken about that according to experts who might trustworthy related to implicitly, you know, we wanna do to even though the dollar as well as the currency of the last decade

with us has basically made out of thing. yeah. most of the 12 treating us dollars, you me cute for those that you see simply by issue and got and see distributing that kind and see which legs that ends up and the american bang. some of them they have coupon. it's a process on that. so this is just money that has come out of the thing that we had. everyone has to remember of a story. and if it can print many times, get revenue extra revenue from wells. and we used to buy as this can be, you used as a source of funding for environmental agenda. just let's just share some of that money that has come out from nowhere to any of my others upset. if you spoke about that or we meant that, then this is also something i can agree with completely. this is what we should be doing. this is the comment i wanted to do to, to, to make i, there's

a lot i could add, but this is the crux of a massive as well. thank you. where do i get you? i was pretty much the president or a new what about present believe has he invited you to the climate conference next week? yes, he has invited me. it's cob. this is back to them while i have risen, keeping to why cool. i'm president leven, i agree with that. russia would be represented at the high levels payments, but it's not this event, well is going to be attended by the chairman of the russian government, misdemeanor shooting. well, that's incredible. i'm going to do that. well, let's move to another subject that is a set of great concentra, one of us because what international relations scala you'll spoken about your version security. and we spent a lot of time discussing that on the valve di reports due to logic. stent is good to go to do that, and you've got a very good uh session. and i would like to give the floor to our friend from no,

no way. glen deason is going to uh, share the somebody with you. thank you mr. prince. my name is glen decent, i'm a professor of political economy from norway and yes, are kind of what's on the ration security. i just like to outline 3 main points. the 1st was that the source of conflict today appears to be a conflict between unit polarity and multiple are to now to a large extent, this represents a new phenomenon in the international affairs of the 19th century. we had this united states as a dominant maritime power in conflict with the, the russian empire as the dominant planned power. in the 20th century, we had the united states spit on the american power against the soviet union. and the end of the present time it's, it's some of the different us we have united states again and us dominance, marathon power, but on the ration continental now, seeing the emergence of multiple parity, which it also presents

a lot of new opportunities cuz even the largest economy, china and it doesn't really have that capability, or it doesn't even display the intention of attempting to dominate this consonant. instead, we see initiatives being put in place for multiple or duration. so this puts us there for the coming link between unit follow systems attempted to be restored by the united states versus a multiple our system. the and the global majority seems to obviously prefer the multiplier to, which is why i think breaks has been such a great attraction to many countries. however, in our discussions, we also discovered a consensus test. there was some concerns or at least a desire for your asia to be um, um, um, hedge a monic movement as opposed to being out by west or as the objective should be to harmonize interest and, and this era local politics as opposed to you racial mainly becoming

a blog and again, the tracks number bricks, countries towards the sea ration formats. lots of the rest of them. this idea that we could overcome the block politics rather than to come into it. the 2nd points we had was that the appeal of the racial, it's also to large extent of the multi vector foreign policy. this is the ability to diversify economic connectivity with all the major pulse of power. and this is seen us and the substitute to well, the requirements to have more political independence, to more economy and foreign policy. and not merely be a spectator in international affairs. and you have to get and this is why most countries do not want to choose between competing blocks, but instead find a way of harmonizing. and again, the global majority, once you ration multiple r t s, this is a requirement for genuine multilateralism and not the false on which is often been promoted under washington. the 3rd and final point to us that the voltage delivery

ratio past certain the systemic incentives for harmonizing interest. because the great powers in the ratio, they have somewhat different formats for you ration integration, the different interest. we can see this also with russia and china, the spots. we also see that none can really pursue their objectives or formats for integration without corporation with this other centers of power. so this creates incentives to harmonize interest and it seems that this is also what has made big successful us. i remember a decade ago, many people expected central nations to be a class point between china and russia. instead we see becoming a area of cooperation instead of so this gives optimism to other parts of your race as well. and this is drastically different from the alliance system, which is usually used by the senior polarity in your own speech. you refer to the, the imperial impulse of dividing countries. so under the alarm system,

there's always an interesting housing division between china and india. between the, the directs and the romans between europe and russia simply because this helps to divide the region into dependent allies and weak and upper serious. so yeah, so in the spirit of the harmonizing interest, i also had a question of premised on the inability we've had in europe to establish a mutually acceptable post cold war settlements after the cold war. and i think this has been a source of many of our attention, so we never establish the system based indivisible security. instead we returned to block politics and abandoned some of the hopes we initially held in early ninety's by instead of going with nato expansion. so my question was, if you ration multiple are i think on offer different formats for cooperation

between russia and europe as well. i ask this because i had a few years ago, a book with a title would europe best western peninsula upgrade. so you're a chef and yeah, i was wondering, let me see your opinion, see if you see any possibility for such a path forward. thank give the impression question, please forgive me. so i apologize. but what could you please repeat? the last part of your question, could you formulate that again? sorry, well my question was, well, apartments on that data across the ratio of we've seen many countries being able to overcome their, their differences through political differences through economic come back to the to we say this for example, the deals the chinese or promoting between the arabs iranians and was wondering if for some form of formats for great through your aisha in which europe would be

a part of this great to your ratio. if there is some ability to use this breaks or some other institutions to also foster better relations with russia in europe. so we can overcome this a block of politics in europe, which we never were able to overcome after the cold war was meant to push the welcome cold, new windows across to the end of the cold war shots. but there was a chance to overcome this. uh, block mentality, the book block, which of all it takes up to the cold war ended, we need to have a chance to overcome the lock mentality in the block, a policy eligibility. but like i said in my speech vista we had in the process of getting stuff done with the booth. i believe that the united states, but this will go to states. i think they needed that uh with us. well,

they were afraid they would lose control over your i believe, and they want to maintain it. they do maintain their strong uh, control over your a. but somebody, i believe that's at some point that you will leave and lead to a weakening of this. uh no, it's just you can comment on the hierarchy so to speak supply. i'm not trying to blame anyone or imply anything negative about what i'm saying right now. we do see that the few are being covers. most of europe and countries sleep in the nato countries. if this they are acting not in their own interest that acting against their interest in order to satisfy the wishes of american leaders. american politicians. in some american states, threats to energy resources. the goal is to do $3.00 to $4.00,

to $5.00 times cheaper. okay. and then in the countries of the european union with their shania. so this is a deliberate legal decision usually by their so the tax politicians by the tax policy, they create conditions this it, as a possibly for entire company is usually to move from europe was due to the united states as my they do moving, in some cases this uh, associated with the resources like on site, for example, in the areas like glass system works or c, right and some agricultural sectors and they do move to america just because of and now they're familiar with this, the old so affecting the metallurgical sex to it's now the ultimate walton motors all the way just through the car industry is also being affected. and you could accumulate. the motor is looked at the allegedly inefficient management within

those companies, but it is a weight of a fluid all the governments. but so the deal is the best, but it's always the result of specific policies because the management can do something to save, jumping funds, it's not always possible for it. and so, but the more that is why to, to conflicts because the conflict is really that unfortunately, that's what i'm me with them. so one plus the, we are the bottles, it allow the united states that the number one union to achieve the strengthening of their role within europe. fully grasp on your business to just look at it as a call from colonial defendants. the suit of colonial independence has come see all the europe and the same is happening to japan and it's surprising we didn't do anything that didn't have funding, you know, slow. we never decided anything on that about japan. and now we have sanctions coming at us from japan. why do you intend to,

how do we and what do we do is going to do? we didn't do anything wrong against japan. we didn't from them in any way. see, what do we have colleagues from japan? here with us today, and the stretching with europe is even worse, and i spoke about that before, but i'm going to go to reiterate that again. i had a conversation with the german chancellor called in 1994. but let's go with his do some of them. i saw him speak to the former human ski and i was the ones who spoke to the a former mayor of st. petersburg here. in fact, i sometimes dissipate to them. that's a conversation as a translator. and so you see i stayed there and then translate to the conversation of them. and so through nick of initiatives you to me as a, for, from our intelligence offer it to us on the soviet union. i was surprised to hear who i do, what she said to do, i do as i listen to him as i translated and i need to go to if i was mildly

speaking of such a surprise, the lady is just some because in my head the bachelor and the notions of cold war as a former intelligence officer, a bully ship to protect. and if we cold, cold said to push through that if you are a single one which you to maintain itself that last is on center has all of the global civilization that suits you must be with the washer. and we need to join efforts. and i just gasped no, but those will tend to reduce it and go to and does he kept telling me, you're talking about this review of it said that according to him of this and that is going to happen on the american continent. and so can we start this way? it was the united states is going to act. so in this way, and i'm not going to tell you everything, but for us to go, didn't say i just think bad about the united states because he was just talking as like a textbook like a funded i noticed the chancellor was this but deal simple.