the, the and i would like to take this opportunity to congratulate him on his election as president of the united states of america. so you are ready to hold a discussion with trump really ready doing a record for our session at the folder discussion club. i'm gonna have to think congratulates donald trump on his presidential victory and says, russia is open to restoring ties with the u. s. as most wasn't the one. this quote that you as president selects trump promises to solve was well, merican military forces are involved with the mainstream media already trying to stick around his plans for the ukraine conflicts germany is governing coalition collapses trunk, low lock solves and the saxes finance minister with the pat,

as low that heads over the contentious, the issue of the lens cost me suppose of the a very warm welcome you're watching on see international with the world news update it to happy with is a top story this i'll have a lot of my page and has congratulated us president elect donald trump on his victory, expressed russia's willingness to restore bilateral relations with the us. and his cold trumps behavior. courageous. mostly salutes have shut up will. yesterday was a big event. the whole world watched with bated breath. as the united states selected, the new president's desk, this is the 6th president doing your presidential post. he's also the 4th one that happens. so do you have any more or less pleasant memories of any of them. ok, keith, who was more interesting to work with was the most of you know, you can also feel whatever you want about trump because everyone initially in his

1st, at the ration as president, they said that he is mainly a business man. and he understands little about politics and can make mistakes. firstly, i can tell you his behavior at the time of the attempt on his life, they made an impression on me. he turned out to be a courageous man, and it's not just about his raised hand and the call to fight for their coming ideals. it's not just about that. although of course, this is all about the drive as person shows himself in extraordinary conditions. i don't hear a person shows himself and he showed himself in my opinion, in a very correct way, courageously like a man. as for politics, in his 1st term, i will say perhaps here and i speak absolutely sincerely. i got the impression that he was hounded from all sides. they did not let him move. he was afraid to take a step to the left to the right, to say an extra word. i don't know what will happen now. i have no idea for him. after all, this is the last term. well, what he will do is these questions take you with such an institution as the

institution of the president in the united states. it is in one way or another bound by certain obligations. it is in one way or another connected with those people who contributed to his coming to power. jack shock once said to me, what kind of democracy are we talking about in the united states? what kind of democracy there without a $1000000000.00? if you don't have a $1000000000.00 in your pocket, you shouldn't even think about participating in elections. you can think about it. well, that's the way it is. but those who give these billions, they also participate in the formation of the future team. and if they don't to get someone, they have the opportunity to influence the people, the delegated to this team should come. and here it is very important to what extent the elected leader manages to establish contact. not only with these groups of influence, with the so called shadow deep states, but also with the population, with the people, with the voters. if he feels the promises made to the voters, he's all started the gross and he relying on the sauce dorothy becomes an

independent political figure, including and relations with the groups of instruments that helped him come to power. this is a very complex process. i don't know what will happen in the united states. i don't know, but i very much expect that our relations with the united states will be restored sunday, we are open to it. but what has been said publicly so far? basically, i do not want to comments now on what was said during the election campaign. and as i think was said consciously in the fight for voters votes. but it is not important of what was said in the desire to restore relations with russia to contribute to the end of the training process. in my opinion, it seems to me that this deserves attention at the very least. and i would like to take this opportunity to congratulate him on his election as president of the united states of america. i have already said that we will work with any head of state atrocious, that the american people trust this will indeed be the case. but in practice,

i use it on a loop and if he does what he has been saying all along, literally in the near future before the, you know, the ration he will call you and say, let him or let's meet. what does that to? yeah, it should, you know, i don't think it would be shameful for me to call him. i just don't do it because the leaders of western countries at some point called in the almost every week and then suddenly stopped. well, they don't want to. so what, as you can see, we are alive and well and doing well, we are developing, moving forward, if any of them wants to resume contact. i have always said, and i want to say it again. we have nothing against it, please. we will resume context and hold discussions. while there are many who want to hold discussions, there is a whole room here. but if not, we will hold discussions with you. so you are ready to all the discussion with trump ready ready to during this annual plan, the recession of the voltage discussion club, penny recession flooded my pertinence that the pay the pace of the a record for i was plus a couple of range of pressing topics from the really cool was that the global

crises and the facts, the fact to power has shifted to a multi polar wealth or c correspondent don't close at both is based report from the heart of the events. participants engaged in a lot of productive discussions. they covered a wide array of topics including migrant crises, economic challenges, climate issues as well. according to the russian president. a lot of these issues can be solved simply by not repeating the mistakes of the 20th century, but unfortunately that's exactly what the west is doing. and it's doing that through chaotic policies that are creating conflicts around the world and sewing discord inside their own country. it's putting said that the west attitude of just essentially doing whatever it wants without thinking about the consequences is leading down a path of disaster. me. but there should be a pass me just we have come to a dangerous line calls of the western states for a strategic defeat of russia. a country that possesses the largest arsenal of nuclear weapons demonstrate the outstanding adventure prism of some western

politicians. such blind faith in their own impunity and exceptionalism may turn into a world tragedy. at the same time, the old hedge a months since colonial times a custom to rule the world are increasingly surprised to find that they are no longer obeyed. 2 attempts to forcefully hold onto their slipping power lead only to general instability, rising tensions, casualties and destruction. such attempts do not have the result that those who wished to retain their absolute undivided power are striving for. because the course of history, it cannot be stopped and instead of realizing the futility of their aspirations, the objective nature of change. some wisdom, the leads, seem eager to do anything to prevent the emergence of a new international system that is in the interests of the global majority, the policies of the united states, for example, and its allies in recent years. follow the principal. if we don't get it, no one will. if you're not with us, then you're against us. look at this formula is very dangerous, right? on that know, a lot of our uprooting also said that nobody in the multi polar world should feel

like a defeated power. and that anyone in the last who tries to isolate russia or antagonize any one nation needs to get with the multi polar world program, put and also emphasize something that he said time and time again that no one country is national. security can be insured at the expense of an of another nation's, despite how much the west is attempting to keep its hold on. it's monopolist of power around the world. now, lot of our uprooted did say that the west has made significant contributions to the development of society, but every monopoly throughout history has its time when it comes tumbling down, even though russia never said that it was an enemy of the west. on the contrary, vladimir putin says that russia does not feel that way at all. you should give me a good one, like our opponents. russia does not perceive western civilization as an enemy. we do not pose the question us or them for whoever is not with us. is against us,

we never say that we do not want to teach anyone, impose our world view on any one. the so called collective west. another has made an unprecedented attempt to cut russia off from the world economic and political system to mean that the volume of sanctions and punitive measures applied to our country is unparalleled in history. we didn't even with our opponents, assumed that they would deliver a crushing knockout blow to russia from which it would simply never recover and would cease to be one of the key elements of international life. i think there is no need to remind what happened in reality. the fact that develop the discussion club gathered such a representative audience speaks for itself. of course, this is not about founding, but about the realities in which we live and in which russia exists. the world needs russia and no decisions of either washington or brussels. supposedly bosses over others can change that sort of the same applies to other decisions. even a train swimmer cannot swim against the power for current, no matter what tricks,

no matter what the doping who use this and don't use the current mainstream of world politics is pointing in the other direction in the opposite direction to the aspirations of the west. from a descending hedge, a monic world to, to an ascending diversity that what we just heard, there is also tied into the kremlin. it's position that russia wants peace and that nobody in washington or in any other western country for that matter can change that and put in also said that the west, the version of democracy, it keeps manifesting itself not by not as ruled by the majority, but as ruled by a minority and as the multi polar world continues to emerge, its gonna become more and more necessary even more so than now to base the further development of that world on maximum representation by all parties involved the crew to equation. so what kind of conflict though we're witnessing today? it is not a conflict between everybody and everybody caused by a deviation from some rules that we are often told about in the west. no, it is not. we see a conflict between the overwhelming part of the world's population,

which wants to live and develop in an interconnected world. and the vast array of possibilities and the minority of the world's population, who are only concerned with one thing to maintain its dominance. and for the sake of this, it is ready to destroy the achievements that are the result of a long development towards the universal world system. but as we can see, nothing comes out of it and nothing will come out of it. at the same time, the west itself is hypocritically trying to convince us all that what you meant if he has achieved since the 2nd world war is under threat. it is not what russia and the vast majority of countries are seeking to do is to reinforce the spirit of international progress and the desire for lost in peace. that was at the heart of the development of the middle of the last century. and what is under threat is actually quite different. what is under threat is the western monopoly that emerged off to the collapse of the soviet union. they realize that any monopoly, as we know from history comes to an end sooner or later. there were also

a lot of comments made regarding the cold war and the enormous contributions that the ussr made to help oppress nations break the chains of imperialism. of course i and that's century uh that was also the same century when nato emerged though, a military block that continues to expand into eastern europe despite the fact that russia was told that it would not continue expanding that way. put and talked about how the g 7 nations padded russia on the back when they invited moscow to make the organization the g 8. well, that organization continued to expand contrary to russia's national security interest. and this is an organization that to this day is even expanding to other regions around the world despite being called the north atlantic treaty organization. so clearly this is a hostile military block that the us is using to enforce its zone of control stokes of conflicts essentially and provoke russia and make them, you know, even before all the acute conflicts of today, many european leaders said to me,

why are these getting us with you, we are not afraid, we don't see any threats. these are direct quotes, you know. but i think that the united states understood this and felt it very well . they would already treating nato as a secondary organization, but still, experts there understood that nature wasn't necessary and how to preserve its value, its attractiveness. we need to scare the hell out of it. it is necessary to tell russia and you're a part. and so, especially russia, germany and france and that, so they brought us to the, could it can ukraine and to the hostilities in the southeast, in don't bus. they simply forced us to retaliate. in this sense, they achieved what they wanted. the same thing is happening in asia on the korean peninsula. in fact, we see that the world minority, preserving and strengthening its military block hopes to retain power in this way. but even within the block itself, we can already understand and see that the crew will dictate of the big brother does not contribute in any way to solving the problems facing. everyone thinks the

prototype of a new free and non blocked nature of relations between states and peoples. is the community that is now being formed within brick system. this is illustrated with some of the other things by the fact that even among nato members, there are those as you know, according to rested in working closely with breaks down the subject of nato. the russian president also said that the west proceeds its military head, germany as a manifestation of the end of history, but hooting retorted to this. he said that history continues that the world is entering a new multi polar stage. and that it's impossible to stop the winds of change. earlier, i discussed the issues, ways to a buy price, as opposed to get the ball club without to use contributes to tolerate. i tried to ask a question, but i was in the back, so i don't think i was seeing or even known that i was the only american there. but um, but it was very fascinating. and what was fascinating about it was just how he could

really get into the historical parts of it, the deep into the, you know, educational parts and historical reasons for decisions that were made um you know, for. and then we also talked about discussions that were made like about a i climate change. it wasn't just all about you know, the election. although that was a prevalent parts of some of the discussions that of all day club. there was so many other things and like you said, there was a lot of talk about multi puller world, the brakes. and you know what that means about going ahead with other countries um, using their own currency. and it was just really fascinating. and you know, i, i was just again amazed at how quick on the, his feet, how, what a great sense of humor and his memory for different interactions. he had with past politicians from different countries verbatim. it was really uh educational. and i think meaningful for everyone there. and of course, um,

one big takeaway for many of us was when president putin, for me congratulate to donald trump on his re election. and also saying that, you know, we might even pick up the phone and give him a call the so the window seems to be open for transatlantic discussions and possible bridge building here. that's something to be optimistic about, isn't it? so what are your thoughts on what the next trump presidency will bring to russian american relations? i felt such a profound sense of relief when i heard trump say clearly that he was gonna stop all the wars, all the foreign adventures. and i think the 1st thing, of course, that has to happen to stop the funding there was supposed to be $400.00 and some $1000000.00 going to ukraine. so hopefully that will be stopped. you know, and as it's it, it seems like people collectively in the united states were relieved to. so this was really good. and president putin seemed very open and he was very frank about the fact that, you know, russia wasn't the one that broke the ties. russia wasn't the one that broke the

promises. and, you know, he talked about nato and how it pushed eastward, after they said they wouldn't and put them in a position, you know, where you, they had to respond to protect the people of the dumbass. but we are, we already know all the reasons for the military special operation, but he really went into depth about explaining that again to the europeans, into the after commissions and everyone that was there. because you have a really wide ranging international group that was here. and it was just really a positive thing. and what i found really positive to nikki is just hearing talks about innovation and building instead of war and destruction. so let's hope that trump feels the same way and he's a business man. hopefully he wants to somehow rebuild trust with russia and reach out more of like, rather than talk like towards the ends all the 4 hour sessions resume piecing with us while he,

when he gives interviews to western media outlets. the president reminded the already as well as sort of pressure russian journalist space and not positive the world some shots on the bottom. i think it is incorrect to directly address the populations of those countries whose leadership condemns us and does not want to hear any of our arguments. we do have relevant structures working there, but they are also being clamped down on despite the declared freedom of speech. our journalists are not allowed to work there, neither in europe nor in the us. they close everything down and create a lot of difficulties. just ask margarita simone young. she'll tell you what they do to them to their journalists. we have only one point of support there for russia to day, and that's it. there's nothing else and we, we don't have an extensive system there like western media outlets do. but they are trying to shut down, are the 2, and they are afraid of it. well, president elect donald trump is set to move back into the oval office is for my democratic rival, kind of the how is this today in span mode? this time saying vladimir putin would h b u. s. president elect for lunch, aust,

about that commentary, the criminal spokesperson outlines that's just not possible. a certain the election device. pamela harris, suggest the now let's recap the lay of the land. the following tuesday is that us presidential election. essentially, the democrats have a nightmare of a night, as republicans painted them, not read until the dominant political outlook, the political swing states either or went to trump or the to where the account continues. he's leading and then by some mountain, arizona and nevada in the west that in terms of own important electoral college votes, 270 was needed for victory. trump stone post that the currently sit on 295 versus 226 for harris, one in the race to control congress. the republicans have taken control of the

senate and the just 9 seats out of a possible 139 away from securing the house of representatives of the clean sweep of only like 2 branches of government. losing sight is looking for someone to blame a democrats. they didn't even sure. and they need to be honest. and they need to say yes, there is stairs massage any, but it's not just massage we from like ma'am. mm. to massage any from hispanic man . right. is massage a from black man to why do you think that an educated white women voted against bear, reproductive health freedoms? and why do you think, let the know man voted in favor of someone that's going to deport? it says he's going to deport the majority of his way and we still have an electorate $70000000.00 plus that will be voting for a man who said he was going to assassinate for trees. and i vehemently disagree with the decision that americans made. but i feel very, very hopeful that we have

a democratic system in this country. we say valuate, we should love it. we should protest if what if the situation arises that we need to protest, which i'm sure it well was the leaders rushed to congratulate trump on his victory despite some of them openly bashing him before they australian and boss. is that to the us wants to squads trump as quotes the most destructive president in history, but also election results became known the invoice related his comments. new york is also busy sticking to shape a new strategy towards working with the united states. the u. k. prime minister, along with the foreign secretary, have a paid a house out phone calls to donald trump while area they open. they told him a neo nazi ukraine's the landscape meanwhile, was across the y as well with less to some phone calls, expressing his hopes america continues to bankroll keeps coming just weeks off the he was stay sides taking a not the republican tickets, but looks to end the conflict, a solo translate a fun campaign,

pledge to end was what americans forces are involved and is now a potential piece. plans for ukraine is cropping off in west and media advises to the president elect to report that they proposing to freeze the conflicts by stop this in the militarized zone. spending a 1000 kilometers along the front and exchange calf would promise to give up on a nature bid for 2 decades. what washington would continue to quote, preemptively um ukraine? donald trump's repeatedly hit the campaign trail with a message, the goal must be stopped. i will end the war in ukraine, which would have never started if i was for a bite, and then tomorrow i got us into this war and ukraine and now they did get us out. they to get us out. but we're stuck in that war unless i'm president, i'll get it done. i'll get it negotiated. i'll get out. we got to get out. i don't, i don't appreciate it. so let's be coming to this country and telling the american

taxpayers what they ought to do. he ought to say thank you to the american taxpayer . we spoke to us radio and television, joining this to gall and nixon. he highlighted the phase about the consequences for presidents alexis trump, over the real presence of a deep state in the country are justified in the history of the us. the state is one, is fraught with, you know, violence and even assassinations of a political figure. so, you know, we have to be, have fear and concern about what could potentially come of this contradiction between president present into electrodes of political positions and those of our deep state. so, you know, there's no way to know what will come of it at this time. the strength i would say of president trump is that he won in such a land slide that the american people, people of all races, ages, genders, etc, came together and decided that they wanted him. and if they wanted his party, i certainly know that there are people such as me who have issues with the

republican party on a number of particularly cultural and maybe even economic issues. but who recognized that we would be far better off to have a donald trump and a republican party probably right now in power in light of the dangerous circumstances that we have been dragged into by the neo conservative, fascist in a bind administration. and to be quite frank and the, some of those were allowed in the previous trump administration. and of course in the bind administration certainly were looking out to see which ones cabinet is going to look like. because that will determine whether or not he's able to take an alternative route. um, as far as sort of policy is concerned that he did. 4 years ago when he was in office, germany's world in coalition as collab stove and inside governments or dispute on age for ukraine. germany's finance minister who's now being fired from his role by, oh that's schultz slammed his former boss, saying he had hoped to send k of long range missiles and the police,

the nation's military stokes, instead of the trunk this time to sit more cash to the landscape. a $104.00 volumes under the pretext of supporting ukraine. the government made a decision to increase the national debt by 15000000000 euro sunday. no, this was done in order to avoid making difficult decisions. however, there was no clear proposal to examine the constitutionality of this decision. this handling of the basic law of the federal republic of germany was negligent, and it would have been a violation of my oath as a member of the government. the chancellor knew this therefore demanding this from me ultimately broke the coalition on gun. so during finance, minister from the centrist, economically liberal, yellow light of schultz as traffic light coalition, just decided that he really isn't interested in a career as a magician attempting to work miracles with shultz is spending priorities. all right, so just imagine the seeing here, germany basically virtue signals itself right into economic devastation. following

along with you sections to impress their girlfriends zalinski, north stream gets blown out. so there was a cheap energy from russia. so now berlin has to rely on a competitor, the us for even pricier energy to power. its economic engine and europe's volkswagen is closing down plans for the 1st time in nearly a century of existence. guess it's really expensive to make cars without cheap fuel . you know, have trump coming back into the office into the white house. he's not exactly the kind of guy to be setting a table for 2. if you get my drift. and here you have chancellor. all sure it's running around trying to plug roles in this thinking shift that he basically created himself wanting to blow the budget on things like subsidizing the prize. the energy, when they could have just had the cheap supply from russia, which would probably explain why schultz also says that he wants to keep spending even more cash on cranking out supports. and the weapons for germany.

i mean, for ukraine because pay, well, someone please think of the poor struggling arms dealers. keep it in germany. i mean, you cranes a floats on fusions. we are increasing our support for ukraine, which is facing a difficult winter after the election in the usa. they should send a very important signal. you can rely on us too often. federal minister lender has block laws in a non objective way too often. he has used petty political party tactics. he has broken my trust to many times, even unilaterally cancelled the agreement on the budget again after we had already agreed on it. in long negotiations, there was no basis of trust for further cooperation. so serious government work is not possible if only the whole german economy could just revolve around weapons making an skyrocketing, ryan, metal stock, maybe germans can dr. ryan metal tags along the other bon instead of volkswagens. oh, and schultz also watch some cash for his green agenda to the one that all the struggling

farmers hate because it's killing their business. so schultz takes all this, this whole mass and dumpster in finance, minister christian winters law, and says make it work. so schultz also says he wants a quote, social cohesion, pensions, and health care in there to yeah. and lenders like you want me to deliver all this while walking on water while i'm at it. yeah. but i'm out with off show to, along to the north go off shoals as long failed to recognize the need for a new economic awakening in a country which he has long play down the economic concerns of us citizens. even now, he is questioning the necessary decisions so that citizens can be proud of germany again. his count of proposals adult unambitious and make no contribution to overcoming the fundamental weakness of growth in our country and yet, so that we can maintain our prosperity, our social security, and our ecological responsibility. unfortunately, oh,

off schoultz has shown that he does not have the strength to enable our country to make a new start for, for so he's like, i'm supposed to be the pro business tax type guy, which doesn't exactly drive what you're spending is free because pricing virtue signaling isn't exactly a proven economic tactic for growing an economy. would it be fun to hear and try to explain all that to trump shots given economic less than to trump, the businessman. so basically, lender bills of cabinet and like a bunch of teenage girls on the bathroom break, the rest of his party goes with i'm setting to see for a confidence boat probably in january and a potential election around march. seems like the big winters and all this though, are the german people. judging by schultz is 18 percent approval rating reported by your own use back in september. it sounds like miller is really just giving shots a little shot in a highly popular direction. we can find plenty more details on the analysis on one

of us stories on our website, all t dot com always good to have you with us. they are not see international pricing on the e o lea, no e, i need the team. uh when i was a little girl as young as 5 years old, my mom took me to all of our families protests to fight for the return of our land called to redeem.