the russ yes. basically spoke about sending the swedes between the 2 nations to somewhere around $100000000000.00 to is $22020.00 towed be in fact i'm not sure. i'm not sure. you know, so today relations have be carried to of a particularly privilege strategic partner. and we pay on main attention to the development of trade in economic ties that would last year. the trade turn of a increase by 60 percent, even more 66 percent in the 1st quarter of this year. it added another 20 percent. so we're looking at a $100000000000.00 trade between moscow and new denny to 2050. i'm. that's a huge star. the but the, we're going, it seems like it's a very of achievable one. that's what exports are pointing to remember that he is now in bolting around 40 percent of its 40 from law school, around 60 percent of age. so on supplies from wescal. so that's huge in that sense,

but we're not looking at will and defend sector, which really happens to be the one of the 3 between the 2 countries of the thing of social also affect us. do this and get a science we're looking at for july. those we looking at a crop so with it, bills of divorces, buying the in that sense rate of cost through is going to be. 1 of hoping, pointed this particular bill for a deputy farm and us or russia is going to be meeting with a former federal minister of india as well as a prime minister over in down every new movie. now that have been several visits between the 2 countries, bcr, so it started with indian carmen to send the read, the more the visiting russia. then h was the nbc indian n c a g to was who was a, did the most school in easy when there was a proposal of bulk of the escalating the war between russia and ukraine. the next was it again was for breaks with the prime minister over india for the 2nd time we

visited. um, whether did russia cause on where a bridge summit was held, where we also saw that under uh under um you know, in fact let me put it this way that's on russian. so in the so the chinese stuff evident as the indian farm and stuff for the biological after 5 years old. yes. so now what does that back drop this visit also becomes would take you literally, unfortunately. so the, the, your and visit. so to see what you know, people will be curious about is whether we would see the russian presidents coming to india next. yeah. so i'll change the roads and so i'm about to hang out through the latest meeting in a meeting when by thank you very much. my engine to i'm just so this all it is the by we'll see what the top is. got lots of stories coming. your way, so i see them the,

i'm actually under tempting welcome back to going underground rule casting around the world from the u. a. e. as we continue is a couple of the tribes of trump, as well as grocery inflation hits by the proxy war on russia through ukraine. the swing boats of arab americans during holocaust harris genocide in west asia. freedom of speech on need on muskets. twitter x platform was critical for the drums re election and exposing the censorship on the platform with the help of muscular journalists like today's guess to publish documents, proving that before them ask both x, there was no free speech, just like there is nothing today on google metro facebook and on the pro harris outlets in the run up to jump to victory. joe rogan came there is only one man out there you can trust when it comes to journalism in the usa. joining me again from new jersey is recognized as math. how you'd be rolling stone, full and the contributing editor and all of her, all of your time's best sellers hate in the divide and insane found president. mad

thanks for coming back on the show. i didn't know what that last spoken saying, found president, i don't know whether to who that referred to obviously, before we get to your reaction to the victory. as i said, rogan credited with helping. trump said you are the only person. well he said he says you are the only person the dress um he said to have a stop the lead on musk uh your, your the go to guy mosque talk a call soon. these adult trump cabinet materials. maybe by the time this is broadcasted some cavity members of the scary, a ones we'll talk about, the hate that will it be in? announce have you had a cold? have you had a goal yet? this of oh no, nobody in their right mind would think about mission working in government along that would never ever be possible. um the ideal press secretary mouthpiece for trump, shirley to answer questions to the legacy media. um,

i don't think i don't think i would enjoy that even in the best of circumstances although you know, look there are, there is a tradition of journalists doing that. but um i, i, i could never go over to the other side of the gate. i can't see it a baby baby hits piece, but more seriously amazing. the aspect of this election was that anyone who to the media mess mainstream, so called media controlled the minds of americans. that money was the big decide their own elections, that the intelligence agencies control, the american electro process. now, does it have any power? it turns out the people they want to, they, they want it iris and the american people were the trump a boy. i think they tried their hardest to influence the selection. i mean, we had incredible endorsements. there's this organization called national security

leaders for america, which is a, put out a, a statement with $1043.00 a, you know, national security officials, including a long list of a former cabinet members general's admiral server. 200 of the latter. and look, it didn't have any effect and the media is constant. propagandizing not just in the cycle, but over the last 8 years. i think it's very important to point out that it had negative influence on the population. the americans have been told for 8 years that donald trump is a racist and you know, a fascist dictator in waiting, and yet he gained significantly with blacks and hispanic voters today with independence. and so clearly it's not just not listening to the authorities, it's actively defying what they're saying,

which is incredible. we don't know how your toyota files may have attenuated some of the shadow banding and censorship on other platforms. but do you think it's clear that the trump administration will? well, trump administration's justice department, we'll have to bring zack, a bug send a rapid drive, google youtube, to some kind of justice for monopoly censorship, for reasons it's clear they are shadow banding people and restricting free speech in the united states. you know, i, i, i hope there's at least an investigation. um you know that somebody like jim jordan is, is allowed to jim jordan, representatives for ohio and yes. or in the house. uh yes, but, but um, but you know, there's the worries that i have and this is something that i said from the start about these tools that we discovered in the twitter files is that they can be misused by anyone. and the,

the sort of history of this new movement towards was like europe's digital services act or the online safety act in the you, k is that they're designed so that who, whoever is in power can use them. and there's going to be an enormous temptation for anybody who sits in the chair to start to toggle things up and down in a certain way. and so i do hope the trumpet ministration, resist the temptation. so we don't know that it does sound bad, optimistic, and you know the deal unless because a close advisor is wrong. and so for here we go, you'd be over the moon about this. well, i mean, you want suppressing my account. so i mean, i use is not exactly someone who is a police or repair that relationship, because yeah, i can see a startled expression with joe rogan when rogue, i mean rogan literally singled you out, and there's no that trump is single, that rogan as being a really important factor in this wind for setting demographic to yeah,

i mean look, he wants a complicated character, but they're all complicated characters and they're all subject to all kinds of pressures. and we don't know exactly what they're being told behind the scenes and what kind of um, you know, sort of deals are being brought to them by the security agencies, by advertisers who are threatening to boycott. we don't know the, the entire story. i do think that the trump administration work, or the donald trump and people like a new vance visit least brought the censorship issue out into the open and said they're opposed to it. which site is a huge start and you won most cuz somebody who just just by doing the twitter files to this amazing public service by exposing the whole thing to, to the public. so yeah, i'm not on optimistic. i just would like to point out that there is, there are temptations for any politician here. yeah,

you mentioned my data terry and country britain which has the gross censorship and no free speech and so on. i mean, trump immediately reacted to we had your colleague full factor on the show the other week, immediately we had to disagree his time is labeled by the interfere and say, attempted interference in the us elections. yeah, i mean i, i hope he doesn't my, my, my, the instinct is that donald trump does not like, uh, these types of laws. he hasn't said a whole lot about them. but there were some communications in the tutor files where he complained about certain posts and kind of sorta asked that they be taken down, but they were few and far between compared to the enormous quantities that were coming from the other side. and so yeah, i'm optimistic, i think, you know, absent

a trump victory, we were looking at almost certainly at the united states, adopting something like the dsa or the online safety act in the very near future. i think that was coming up because in, in, in, in part because of the argument that the failure to regulate social media led to trump selection or worked or to something or to trumps come back, at least. so had he not one, i think we would, we would have seen some kind of crack down pretty quickly and that would be in the end of the day, we to maybe just yes, me and then probably a whole bunch of other folks. and we already have de facto censorship in this country. it's done an informal way and instead of a formal way as it is in, in europe. um, but, you know, i think if, if uh, if there been a close contested situation. if there had been demonstrations where, you know,

there are people out in the streets and, you know, they were telling us ahead of time that they were concerned about the possibility of misinformation inspired violence. so if there been anything like that they would have, they would have clamped down. i know they have legislation in place for, for the venture ality is like that. so rumble would have been attacked, which the show goes out on. i should add a free speech really important when it came to persuading publics in your which as you say, they've got these low as all from a to tell it area and isn't already a very important though to get support for zalinski to outlaw the word nazi in british media in the united states media, do you think zelinski will face noriega is right. so that was saying straight the face of the nose, who the united states, a suppor to band elections and all position bodies, all the rest of it. and then are turned to the scrappy history. it's possible,

you know, trump, trump did approve some funding for ukraine in the past, but he is off. he has run as somebody who's against a prolonged war and i think his supporters would be incredibly disappointed if there was not a swift negotiated end of the conflict in ukraine. it's part of his political identity that he was against the so called forever wars. it's not clear to me that his record matches up with that. exactly. but he's, it was ran on that. and i know from covering his campaign in 2016, that this was incredibly important to building up his support with kind of working class america. where if you go around to red states and you see so many people who came back from america's adventures in nor misadventures, and in afghanistan and iraq. and there was so angry about so many things. and that was a huge factor and electing trump the 1st time. and i'm sure this time as well. when

we get rid of the phrase middle class, which is the one, the democrats always love to use and start using the phrase working class in the united states. again, firmly and properly because i mean, clearly the media had no idea who is going to win this election, nor did the pulse cuz where people start to understand the working class is alive and well, or at least they were dying and were i'm home before they vote at this time around in the middle classes in tremendous trouble and has been since 2008 their faith after 2008 we. we instituted bailouts that were openly unfair. right? they were, they, they rescued the people who are responsible for, for the crash, and they left all, you know, people in the sort of middle class or lower middle class suburbs and rural america to be hit by mass foreclosures. they lost their life savings if they were

invested in mortgage mortgage backed securities, which a lot of pensions pension funds were. and so there was an incredible well spring of anger towards the upper class or managerial sector of america. and what was worse was that when trump that elected those same people began to use projective terms to describe those people. then we stopped using working class as something that was a good term and sunday. and they started using white working class, which became synonymous with racist. and i hope this stuff is, is over because we just went through a period of 8 years of essentially kind of narrow panic where everything was distorted. and i hope we can go back to just describing things as they are and talking to each other is normal americans. again, may i be, i'll stop you the more from the award winning john this involved a really strong contributing editor after this break the

welcome back to going underground. and i'm still here with the award winning journalist involvement, rolling stone contributing editor matt daisy, matt. we told him at the working class cause the issue, the single issue that this region where i'm speaking to you from is the guy's a genocide. and obviously that influenced the votes in michigan. but what do you think is the significance of the $100000000.00 from miriam adults into the trump campaign? i mean, is that the $2000000.00 mostly women and children. question when it comes to gaza? what, what is the impact of that donation? to me, i don't know, i mean, i'm not sure that as you mentioned at the top, this was a kind of paradigm shattering election in many, many ways. money didn't matter as much as it has in other elections. in our past,

trump was massively out raised by the harris campaign and it didn't appear um that uh, you know that it was any one donation whether it was from april center mosque turn the tide. i think it was much more the pastor of traditional media and the response of institutional americans that people are voting against. um, so i'm not sure there. yeah. and so he's one of the house and the senate and it's his last term. so perhaps he doesn't o people like a president normally always people, but then we wouldn't even know about some of the atrocities happening in gaza without ironically, netanyahu's friend is not from us because he freed up. but x. what now for um, i think the great british politician george galloway. cool. that mostly a media. what is going to happen to all of that? will they just be able to diag gracefully or will there be some sort of uh,

attempt to buy a trump administration to regulate monopoly media. but actually people aren't that interested in anymore. but maybe maybe go back to fcc regulations that were there before clinton destroyed all your local journalism that used to prosper across the united states as well. i think, you know, when trump got elected he, there was this incredible moment where he, he thanked a long list of pod cas that had been instrumental in spreading his campaign message . and that was a really amazing moment because it, it spoke to the almost total evidence of the so called traditional media in this country. they were really not a factor. if truck tries to crack down in any way on cbs or, you know, get their license here. and because of the shenanigans with some of the editing in the come all areas interview, i think you'd be making

a mistake because the legacy media in america is basically that we saw after this election. but they were unable to process the fact that so much of this country was voting against them, that they had lost trust. and then there was an incredible thing that happened were uh, you know, abc is jimmy kimball, a comedian, rolled his eyes and told the joke about how ridiculous it was that there was somebody who voted for trump because tom alara's wouldn't do an interview with joe rogan know joe rogan, his audiences roughly $25.00 times bigger than the biggest cable audience in america. and for a presidential candidate to issue that interview is basically telling people that they don't want those votes. and so that wasn't silly at all. that wasn't a trifle at all, but the people in the press seems that these people are 2nd rate. and the reality is that the audience figure show that nobody really watches them anymore,

that they don't really have an influence. so better just doing more of them. yeah, and the celebrities didn't work, or either of course, we all remember how trump enlarge this one and he didn't drain this one in the 1st that, um, i know that on peo is being spoken of. how does a pen to can pick, which would surely show he's a game helping this won't but, but to do you think they will be more revenged this time? i mean, his support is used to john, lock them up about hillary and clearly crimes were committed by the bite and the ministration. dividing. harris administration and previous administrations. is he going to open up all the books and start to get these people for all live? what they did to him when he was out of office, because many people thought they would go to jail of a higher said one. well you, you mentioned interviewing paul sacker. we did a story about the center for counter and digital hate. and i heard from the trump

campaign, who told me that in no uncertain certain terms that they were going to be investigated . i think the term was to the hilt, and that was just for starters, they, they intend to do a whole mess of investigations into the censorship complex into the intelligence world. and i think they're serious about this. and they, they know that their voters want mass firings of people from those bureaucracies. they're tired of paying taxes to support these gigantic bureaucracies that consider large parts of the country to be tantamount to domestic terrorist entities. and i think it would be a political mistake if they didn't follow through on those promises because that was central to his campaign. because then when, as what, what threats will be against even a politician. so elected by the popular will vote if he starts release,

i mean he caught release the epstein files clearly because he presented we being had some. yeah, he can release the j f k files, maybe files into the ukraine war. maybe files into all these things that were going island to the harris biden administration. i think it would be a tremendous opportunity for them. it's been suggested on twitter that there be like a government version of the twitter files. and some of his wealthy backers immediately jumped on the idea as a good one. so it would be great if that happened. yeah, i can't imagine that the logistics of that would be easy because they would have to be is a considerable amount of sorting before you let it. you can't just do what do you want it and just let a whole team of journalists run a rep, rummage around and, and all the files. but it would be great if they opened up everything from me on the jeff, his assassination, to you know, the rationale for going to

a rack for entering the ask in more for, you know, the reason for, for staying in afghanistan, for cultures. i mean, there's a 1000000 things that the public has very legitimate questions about, and it wouldn't be wise for trump to open up some of that information. and yet, bump a was at the rallies towards the end of his campaign, who had coordinated assassination attempt to get the julian assigned you of weekly because you're talking in a sense of like a government we helix a yes. and then trump had an opportunity to pardon assange and did not i, i know that he was lobbied very hard by some people close to him to actually go through with that part and then he didn't. so, you know, trump is a complicated figure. i think this is something that people understand about him. they think of him either as this simpleton or this impulsive character who just kind of goes where his emotions leave him in the moment. but he's actually thinking

quite a lot about alliances and who he can afford to make angry and who he wants to keep close. and he's never gone all the way in terms of kicking the national security folks, you know, out the door. he's done some things that were really, really interesting likes, you know, for going the, the, the daily briefing by the c a and all those folks which is long overdue. but, you know, we'll have to see the, his voters definitely want him to take a bigger bite this time and i think for his own self preservation, he's now aware that they want him gone. so i think it will be a harsher confrontation. so kind of return to the image that some have of him is a real estate developer in which way co and the new celebrated movie, the apprentice showing his mentorship of trump that he will actually go for them this time and doesn't have to have to care because what's,

what's it gonna lose him if he, i mean, unless they, caleb, i mean our of k junior's already being on doing the media around saying he's going to does all whole departments of the food and drug administration and effects a big pharma. and we know the power, big farm. i mean the story is a big farmer whistle blows and horribly dangerous circumstances as the 1970s a violence. but what's, what's so fascinating about this moment is that trump got in largely, i mean, his entire power base is not. you know, it has nothing to do with corporate money. it doesn't have to do with institutional america. it's not even really based on things like twitter, x, he just has massive numbers of people who voted for him and he doesn't owe anybody anything. and he can afford to do almost anything in terms of upsetting traditional constituencies and he would be shared for it. so it's a unique circumstance. no,

no president has ever gotten to the the white house and not owed quite a lot this time we'll have to see. but he has opportunities here. and i, and i know from talking to people in this campaign that they're much more cognizant this time of the dangers that surround them from, for instance, to the justice department, the f b i n c i a. so we'll see, the larry think of black rock said, you know, the election didn't matter at all. but anyway, it doesn't matter. so you'd get back to different this of this election really, really did matter when it comes to something different in the united states, especially for the working classes clearly because it's make or break from any of them as well. it may, it may not matter economically. i mean, he's got to figure out some way to, to stop the bleeding for people who are at the, you know, not in the,

in the top 10 percent of the income curve because there's just a tremendous amount of suffering there. i mean, we, and we have these situations where private equity firms are buying up everything from starter homes, to, you know, optim ology practices, to, to know what they call the, you know, the trades. right? so even plumbers are now owned by wall street in there that the american dream is dying quickly because nobody is able to make enough money to get there a little piece of pie anymore. and he's got to find a way to reverse that. or else none of this is going to matter, but i do think culturally the election is already a massive turning point in american history. because it's a, it's, it's essentially expose the entire cultural framework of the country as, as having no influence. and having been lost to its own audience and that's

not something we haven't seen before in this country it's. it's fascinating. and just finally, i feel like i'm asking this question and every single interview at the moment it will, i guess will, will they try and kill him? what was the, i address and kill him in the 2 months before january 20th. a split this way i, i will not be surprised if there are more assassination attempts. there's no evidence that this the, anybody inside the government had anything to do with the prior attempts. nothing that's terribly concrete. but everything is on the table now. i mean, this is, this is maybe the end of everything for nato, for the intelligence services. i mean, there's a lot in the line here. so nothing would surprise me. let's put that in for an intelligence agencies m, i 6. what happens to them? i mean, already people for thing,

intelligence services in europe. i devastated. i mean, it's kind of, it has a some, it's funny. you're going to read it because they're supposed to know what's going on and clearly have no finger on the pulse of the late american capitalism. in the united states as to why americans would vote for trump by the could the united states join break not tell you something, know that it does not tell you that the, that these agencies that we, we fund so have only, i can't even answer the most basic questions about their own populations that they don't understand any they don't understand things the, you know, the, the average barber and a small town in america gets without any funding. you know, these people are so locked up in their own hermetically sealed bubble of stupidity that they, they can't see, you know, beyond their own prejudices. and so that makes them dangerous and useless and expensive. so, um yeah it's, it's so ironic, but it worries me too because,

you know, there continued bureaucratic existence is at stake. but i tell you, be thank you, a man, thanks very much and that's it for the show of continued condolences to those arriving the u. k. u. s. u, i'm tall across here in this region. we'll be back with a brand new episode inside the angel. then keep in touch my role as social media. if it's not sensitive, we'll country and have to our channel going on 20. if you are able to come to us and you know the episodes are going under grants, you said that the, the room is the level of children's card game moving to pay that would have played hey they would have felt safe, but on sunday is all struck them without warning 7 children are long. the $23.00 people killed in an idea of price on the lodge and christian footage. although marked in some.