all i wanted to see 1st hand the scars of war, the i'm actually understand, see, and welcome back to going underground broadcasting around the world from the u. a. e is we continue to cover the try and 5th, trump as well as leaders from the g. 20 gavin today in brazil, the impact of the tragedy of 4 years of genocide. joe, all across kyra's will be good to know nato members as the and i elation of guys that continues and u. k. u. s. u alms written down autonomy on palestine, but on lebanon, yemen and iraq. western european economies based disaster for the proxy war on russia through ukraine, internally,

a class divided usa all you'd be lies in ruins. should we even really be surprised that those known for progressive use on some issues like joe rogan or if k junior dentist percentage a band and the democrats, 3rd wave feminist professor naomi wolf, abandoned them. and she advised about bill clinton and al gore presidential campaigns. the best selling off of the b c at the end of america, and most recently defies the papers. phases, crimes against humanity joins me now from new york. they only thank so much for coming on the show. happy, but they for last week, you know, it was one of america's greatest historians go over the dollars that any president who tackle the us health care from a complex, i presume we also big agriculture will be destroyed by those powerful interest. why do you believe maybe you don't believe a r s k junior let alone trump will actually survive ahead of the 20th of january next year as well. uh,

well 1st i wasn't familiar with that. um with that quote, uh that's interesting. i'll have to check that. i think it was totally the all about the health care reforms that clinton was going to make. and he said he expected he expected any president to be found, having sex with children in the cemetery basically because the whole media, everyone would be against any president because of the powerful interest and big pharma that you've written about. actually. yeah, i'll, i mean, i'll, i'll have to look of course the dog was um, you know, at, since he's like, he liked of sensational quote. so i, i, that's one of those things. i definitely need to check for myself. but did you ask, did you just asked me why? i believe the president in ours could you and your will survive till january 20th? well obviously, that'd be an assassination attempt. and you can see already the, the reaction of the liberal media or is it what will they, will they actually survive? i mean, how, how dangerous is right now for that mean?

do you mean physically survive? you're literally, i think, i think i yeah, i think i probably do actually, i mean, how powerful are big pharma and big agriculture, what i mean, what do they tried to do to you for the sleep? respectfully. i think it's quite inappropriate for journalists to speculate about the murder of a president elect for an ally or colleague of he is in advance of a peaceful transfer of power. i think it's, you know, i believe in florida. i know it's, i'm not speculating and try to encourage you. i'm saying to illustrate how powerful these interest, uh, and what the stakes are in allowing people to democratically transfer about and to actually do the kinds of changes that have been spoken about of a big pharma, for instance. i mean, i think that it becomes more dangerous when, when the press raises by, with possibilities i,

i just really strongly encourage you to, you know, rephrase that because i, i don't really want to be, you know, part of the conversation. of course nothing. i mean, these were threats printers, i mean that's just go back to you. oh, but like, how do you know if there's a survive, i mean, you know, like how do you know any elected official will survive? how do you know any head of state will survive? these are um, quite a decent place. threatening things to speculate how high of the day, how high the stakes. i mean, i've heard you say that even the, even the election means they will have to attenuate any reaction to uh, uh, how they tackle both the big agriculture and big farm are the same time. and maybe they should do this one more slowly than the other. such a powerful intel has to be a messaging purpose. that was the advice i gave for success. and i gave it in

public for successful messaging purposes. that if you take on too much at once, and i gave similar advice, which i can't disclose doing an n d a. but you know, every campaign i've ever advised, i recommended that they take things on to magically. um, you know, take do a week or 2 weeks on agriculture do a week or 2 weeks on farm. i do a week or 2 weeks on literacy and reforming, you know, the school system do a week or 2 weeks on making the iris a leaner and more accountable. it's just about good messaging because if you tackle everything at once and make a lot of scattershot, very exciting announcements. and then we have a situation in which you and i talking about what's going on are not presented with an obvious theme that we have to, which we have to respond were presented with a great deal of information. uh, which makes it harder for journalists to cover any one specific themes. so that was

my advice about that. it wasn't about to be careful. you know, physically, i mean, at every, every president and every tablet member who takes on powerful interests knows that powerful interest will try to protect their, you know, resources. but i really want to move this conversation to a conversation about the peaceful transfer of power and, and, and getting things done in policy terms rather than life or death terms. i, you know, again, i think it's so appropriate to raise that possibility. so i find that papers, for instance, what will we hear as to how they, i mean, i don't know whether our k juniors read your book, whether they will use the information in the to get some sort of a closure. maybe as to how these took about closure for the years of lives. as

regards the pandemic or i really don't know. my dad was a writer and he said that you know, your responsibility or your kind of uh task with every non fiction book. it will fiction to for that matter, i only write non fiction ends with the final word. it's up to the readers to, you know, make what they will of any book you write. so this is a really important book. we put it out, we published it, which is itself a miracle given the wall of censorship around us, or the try to silence this book. 3 different governments tried to silence this book . there was just a judgment in britain, mark stein, who gave me a platform to bring some of the harm's in these reports before this book was published to a british audience and global audience through g b news,

he's just been fined $50000.00 pounds or tasked with paying that amount for legal fees when he sought to defend his reputation of his career. and i went there also to support him in court against off. com, their media watchdog agency in britain suppressing the information. i'm not saying it was not true, but saying that it was harmful to reveal the truth about it. and so i hope of course, you know, our volunteers, these 3250 doctors and scientists who have a to cliff mobilized under our leadership mine. and my colleague gave me kelly's to read through the 450000 internal pricer documents released under a court order. the fda asked the court to keep them hidden for 75 years. the court said no. these volunteers have testified and brought these findings to twice to the australian parliament and they brought them to the brazilian parliament,

which we acted by taking mandates off the table for children with these injections because they're so dangerous and damaged and they brought them into british parliamentary and they brought into senators a sitting in our own congress. so i certainly hope that you know this, this book and its findings which documents the greatest crime against humanity in recorded history will be, will continue to be used. i think it's a factor in the big judgments you're seeing. i don't have a direct knowledge of that. but you know, what's in the price of papers is now public. it's a map, it's, you know, it's in, you know, medical libraries. it's in my local library and book brooklyn. this book, so you're seeing now since the book came out. multi 1000000 dollar judgements in favor of people who were coerced into getting this dangerous knowingly dangerous injection, knowingly sterilizing deadly. in some cases, injection. and you're also seeing multi $1000000.00 step settlements for people who

lost their jobs when they refuse to comply. so, you know, obviously i hope it as it continues to have a life in, in litigation and in justice for the victims. and it's a matter of public record beyond that, i really don't know what will happen. yeah, i mean, this show knows all about off going, they have the latest reports out today. there's the british ends issue of agency where and device. so we don't have to worry about that here, but i suppose when this interview perhaps goes on social media, we'll still have a slight worry in covering issues of the size of the papers because we put it up on google's youtube ahead of this election. yeah, exactly where you could tell me a bit about that, but i had of the trump integration. i mean at least do we look forward to the end of that kind of censorship? industrial complex, i meant how you'd be was on the show, the other day talk about the twitter files of working with the, you know, most of the data. i mean what, what's gonna happen to as a couple guys. so and up i have google, what do you expect? not just related to your work but to, to freedom of speech. yeah, well that's

a great question. i'm happy that you asked it. um, it's so ironic, right? i come from the left as you mentioned to me in your introduction, i'm a, i've been a lifelong democrat and then i walked away and finally endorsed president trump. you know, in lions starkey junior and in advance of the election and encouraged liberals and independents to vote for them. and it's so ironic because the massive groundswell of response, including from the legacy media of my former employer, is the guardian who fears that, that trump euro, trump, or of kate euro will be a fishes take a time of fascism. and of course, the suppression of free speech is part of the fascist tool kit. i've been writing about that since my book, the end of america, which came out in 2008. but paradoxically, the people who censored me and met. so you'd be in michael shaunberger and you know,

professor jane about a chart of stanford who was making very important points about how locked down. so we're going to drive millions of children into starvation, which they did. professor martin cooled off with harvard. any number of serious people, the people who centered us, who were fishes stick about freedom of speech. we're with people. i voted for the bite administration, censored me in june of 2021. when i correctly warned women around the world, but especially in the west that women were reporting menstrual disc disorder, serious menstrual disorders, upon receiving the same or any injection that was correct. and the price of papers abundantly documents of $360.00 degree more on human reproduction, which has resulted now in 2024. and the 13th 20 percent drop in live birds amelion. missing babies in western europe a, her risk sick in, in their charts. and pfizer documents of her wrist,

they damage that phase or knew they were causing to be the fertility in the man's ease of women. the poisoning of breastmilk, the locking of ovaries with lifted mantle particles, the compromise of percentage leading to what is now 40 percent rise in life. birth an over 80 percent, miscarriage rate, and one section of the appraiser documents 2 babies dying in utero in the pregnancy . my case report advisors said was due to maternal exposure that vaccine just went to the white house. and then dr. malesky told the women of america, there was no bad time to get an injection before your baby was born during your pregnancy or after your baby was born. and so it's, it's a bit of a massive crime, but the people who set up an office of this information and use the stalling, has pointed to which doesn't exist in a 1st amendment. society mis information and put pressure according to, to attorneys generals, lawsuits that you know, have, have it, it resulted in

a disclosure of these emails by the white house. it was the white house pressuring tech companies to censor me. he paid my accurate quote warning women about real damage, which really happened that was the white house that was the bite in white house. so i see that paradoxically, the trump era is likely to be one of aggressive defense is for freedom of speech. i hear that we were just kind of do a break, they'll stop you. the law from the co manager defies the papers. phases, crimes against humanity for this, right? the the, the

hello and welcome defrost the full board. here we discuss the wheel in the welcome back to going underground. i'm still here with the co editor of the size of papers professor, naomi wolf. so what exactly was the rationale behind publishes no refusing to publish it. and so, and, and for instance, this english and british censorship, a complex saying we have to find anyone who talks about revelations in what is

behind all of these. uh, okay, so 1st of all, no one refused to publish the pfizer papers in united states. we had a lovely offer from sky hurst publishing, which is a division of assignment schuster, and you can find the price of papers in any local library. you can walk into barnes and noble. you can order from amazon. no one refused to publish it because it is completely accurate. the 2nd thing is the judgment against mark stein and even the court case, which i peered about the uh, off comes action against march times show and acknowledge the judge. acknowledge that it wasn't stating that anything we said was in accurate, it wasn't stating that anything i presented was not true. it was saying that even if it was true, it was harmful to disclose the truth because it could upset people that was there

legal reasoning and you can go to my subject outspoken or get the judgement. it's a matter of public record. and, you know, in the royal courts of justice, so please don't mis characterize. no one has said anything in this book is not true . there's been no resistance to publishing it in the united states around the world . we're getting inquiries from germany and the netherlands, the netherlands has asked a demand at the bill gates as come to court to answer charges. the, you know, after i came with the findings of the advisor papers to the netherlands. um and you know it's, it's simply not accurate that there's been any or discipline, any statement that anything in this book is not correct. the censorship that we do get us from outlets like youtube and certainly all of the british media and certainly all of the legacy media because they don't wanna cover it. they don't wanna cover it because the colluded in taking the money to misinform people and suppress warnings about the dangers of these injections. pardon me?

and that's not, that's a legal exposure for those news outlets and a house in the house. you may be brought to justice under a trump to because clearly the bible harris administrators included just as much as all these censorship uh high tech companies as well. the whole of western europe, i suppose, is just a, you're just gonna have to leave that to one side. they're not going to go the same way, arguably as, what's going to happen in the united states. now, how does he go about it? you need to buy that, excuse me. i don't know what you mean by that, because people who learn the truth about what's in the price of documents all over western europe are very upset and they are wanting their speech rights back and they want their represent to you. there is no, i'm just making the republics where there is a freedom of speech in western europe. you know, rumble is banned outright. and in france, the whole, the whole context of war is currently being forward. i'm not able to be broadcast

about in britain. so that's why i'm exploring west in europe for now how, but at least the united states as a 1st amendment, and clearly the platform to jump right on was again, censorship. so how does he begin to bring these people to justice as well? i just, you know, i'm not in any advisory role with the trump campaigns. yeah. i'm not in a position to, to, to, to tell you except as a citizen, but as a citizen, there are many ways to bring these people to justice all around the world, including in western europe, in the middle east, and israel and australia and africa. so 1st of all, be violated international law because the nuremberg code calls for every you can't do medical experiments on humans without their informed consent. it's, it's completely legal. and that's what pfizer and madana and after seneca, the we don't have materials. now she's going to cause papers and yet that's what

these companies in league with governments around the world did. they violated people. they violated international law by withholding informed consent from people and engaging a massive medical experiment on them. but there are other ways to bring them to justice. we have 2 law suits. sybil lee. they are, they're liable. right civilly. um, you can sue the fda. you can see the white house, and you can see private corporations. so there, that's the nature of many of the lawsuits that are under way. right now. we've advised one team of criminal attorneys and they're going after. i believe we go crimes and trafficking, or to bleeds trafficking, the bodies of people who are forced to receive the injection. certainly there's fraud involved, you know, one of the criminal offenses. the trees general helped us have looked at is false advertising. which state by state, by state is a criminal offense. a fraud is a criminal offense. they think ation fraud by not telling people the truth about

what was in the injections by say, oh, you might have, you know, pain at the injection site or a fever or fatigue. well, pfizer knew the, you know, tens of thousands of, you know, for $42000.00 less serious adverse events in just 3 months, including $1225.00 depths. and it was a fatigue and shells and painted the injection site, its strokes and dimensions, and alzheimer's and parkinson's and a turbo cancers and blood clots and lun clots, and lake clubs and to embodied throughout the site of p. a and skin disorders of all kinds. kidney damage, liver damage, and you to the her wrist stick menstrual and a representative damage that i described. they knew all of this, you know, catastrophic neurological harms. and now we know the mechanism, right? the price of papers shows people how they were injured, and it's very important because it begins to lay down the basis of a science for real healing, which people are not going to get from their doctors because the doctors took the

money and complied. and then professional, you know, medical organizations took the money and complied. so those are multiple ways in the united states. you can bring people to justice in britain, there been some law suits by the vaccine insured. they've been successful and something that i'm that are teaching or has been talking about is it ending advertising a direct consumer advertising of pharmaceutical companies to, to people. and that's gonna change the landscape tremendously, because right now that your television shows use don't cover the damage from any pharmaceutical products because there's so much money. their primary advertisers, at least in television, are pharmaceutical ads. but when that becomes, we're one of 2 countries, the world allows that new zealand being the other one. so when, if that becomes unlawful, there's going to be a lot more coverage of the harms and that'll support people who bring civil and

criminal charges. so those are just some examples, but, you know, europe, i don't, i don't think you're going to be silenced forever. i think people are gonna read the dutch and the german versions of actually if the pfizer papers that are available, you can order them in the u. k. from amazon dot u k. and then you're going to see litigation. you're going to see people being perhaps injustice and other booksellers. i bet so much you've written about over the decades. i uh, you know, i would love to ask you about, um, uh, the gods of genocide. but um, uh, immigration, in the short time we have left you written about how it leads to use immigration. and so a bit about the use of most and we use of immigrant labor from us in raise in the past. how, how important is it from a left perspective to talk about the trump agenda in terms of the fact that

immigration is used by populates a note for good reasons, not for anything good. so i'm not sure i understand your question. i apologize. you've written about immigrants use as mercenaries for the military industrial complex in the united states. right. how does that fit in would be a trump? i mean, you can hear it all on the so called liberal media or in the united states that the immigration, this is just races the policies of the trump administration. but actually there are more complex mechanisms of play when it comes to immigration in the united states. so tell me why there is a good reason to look at immigration in the united states and that boy will just as trump says that he with i see what you're asking. um, well, just to be clear, i didn't state that illegal immigrants were being used as mercenaries. i was concerned that there's my own in reporting on my subject, outspoken sound,

and it's on the white house, you know, website that there is a, a 3 country staging area. where the state department, us, the department of alliance with united nations is bringing in these millions of people v relevant rates, united states, sorry, legal, legal note of illegal as they are illegally in the united states. in other words, the state department and you in, in these 3 countries where they're being processed are colluding to bring them into united states. you legally. which to my knowledge has never happened before that the state department has engaged, you know, with the un in breaking sovereign nations laws in that comprehensive way. but you must know that, you know, 19 to 30000000 people are in the united states. you legally, they are not legal immigrants, they have walked right in and not gone through the process, which is a lengthy one that my grandparents went through, for instance,

and my dad to become legal immigrants, citizens of the united states. they are illegally here. so my concern was a lot of these people who been brought in illegal li are from countries that produced mercenaries around the world. and i was also concerned that a lot of them are military age. and you know, it's just dangerous to have a lot of people who us, we see as, as i predicted, the, you know, it turns out that it's cartels who are taking over and terrifying the residents of housing complexes in colorado and now in 3 other states. but it's dangerous to have military age, men who are here illegally, who can, you know, communicate to do bad things like take over, you know, housing complexes that is a national security risk and anyone would say, so, you know, if 3000000 people walked in to do by, you know, they,

the stories would be alarms to say the least, they wouldn't let it happen. you can't just, you know, walk into most solver nations, exception western europe in north america now present and we will thank you. you're welcome. that's it for the show. i'll continue condolences to those surviving the u . k. u. s. u, i'm holocaust here in this region. we'll be back with a brand new episode on saturday until then keep in touch by the social media. if it's not sense in your country and have to add channel going on, the run tv on rumble dot com to watch new and old episodes of going undergrads. these have the, the, [000:00:00;00]

the, [000:00:00;00] the, if you think about russia. what does your mind picture the bottom landscapes open up before your eyes? the last one does you imagine the, the discounts dodge the journey?

the, the you ready to come along the, the, of all the wall claimed and ruined the lines of tens of thousands. but it was the hague tribunal, with delta of finishing flow to this less on expand on your side, i will talk to you and will all of that will cause up the curious thought me memories that the rest of your stuff or some what's in the funding that has made them, i guess i need, okay. for me is you betcha so mutual blood test with you guys are throwing in eco so tired out table a cause and built around what sort of on team so so so this would be a vision to for something to be jamie stuff. as i've done this, your boss, they have to go into stuff as i so this,

so now quit holding nice to cover the problem. also, i noticed with some of the the, the, the hello and welcome to cross that bullhorn to where all things are considered on people. about one of the most important victims of politics is personnel is policy . given donald trump's growing list of unorthodox appointments. it's difficult to discern what foreign policy, who's in ministration will pursue, change or continuity, discuss these issues and more. i'm joined by my guest, george samuel, we in buddha, betsy's a broadcast where the goggles, which we found on youtube and locals. and here in moscow, across to do me pre bob, which is deputy board editor, right, comfortable sky from the daily, for a gentle and cross that girls that effect,