the bombs, the building next to all the people under the rubber automobiles. no one has come to the line. and still, no one came into the drum. no, and the fence. the situation in the news is tragic. and we'll decide to see it honestly and the situation is very, very difficult about them that we don't know where we are going. we have no shelter except for god was it? well that medical the work is there to try to say if it was a bank labor on the fire as well, and doctors without borders, say that a test off of just being killed during the conflict. we spoke with the deputy medical coordinator in the palestinian territories, having listen to this as it was petty and the situation is very, very bad. i mean, it does the w ending every day. the man hospitals in the north and gather city in the south of gaza has been taught people during this war. now some of them out of 5 sure the functioning. but i mean, pleasure to find, to me, i mean there is no bit capacity with this huge number of the dead kids that mean

there is more than 150000 between the kids doesn't want to every day that is, um, i'm gonna read them off but i'm 70 and then i'm 101 did so that remaining costs because which are functioning now i'm not able to go just bear this and enjoy. is that my schedule in that use that the we have on getting a basis in the north and yeah, i mean, distribution is really, really difficult for the population model living the most of the guys jump out and you have it here at the time. i mean, from the end of that mean there is a 3 of us because boss really functioning these us because has to be in this that all this targeted at us did the idea and understood submit to go stuff, for example, the main hospital coverage one. now is the main austin note that receiving a lot of when did, there's only 2 doctors who are not able to save that because one of them is a pediatrician and one is as you have to shut down, not able to do searches. i'm not going to save lives,

patients are coming to die and this was because, in addition, there is a good as sounding over this area of the not the, i'm not allowing the material is to endeavor for the, the, to the, to the area. so the screen is really good because what really seems reports from our people are remaining there from the national stuff. the it's very difficult, very dangerous to add data v d facing as foundation the theme or wrapping up at this and use a program for now. however, with a fairly new world order taking shape worldwide, will those who prop up the car in a unit lateral system go quietly into the night? or is it going to be some kind of g o 2, cedric issues solving as board next? pretty a firey issue of a wells of pod coming your way next year or not the

the i'm action or time. see and welcome back to going underground broadcasting around the world from the u, a. e. as we continue to cover the triumph of trump as well as leaders from the g 20 gather. today in brazil, the impact of the tragedy of 4 years of genocide. joe, all across our will be kids and on nato members of the united nation of guys that continues in u. k. u. s. and you arms written down autonomy on palestine, but on lebanon, yemen and iraq. western european economies based disaster for the proxy war on russia through ukraine, internally, a class divided usa all you'd be lies in ruins. should we even really be surprised that those known for progressive use on some issues like joe rogan or if k junior dentist percentage a band and the democrats,

3rd wave feminist professor naomi wolf, abandoned them. and she advised about bill clinton and al gore presidential campaigns. the best selling off of the b team at the end of america, and most recently defies the papers. phases, crimes against humanity, joins me now from new york to nearly thank so much for coming on the show. happy birthday for last week. you know, it was one of america's greatest historians go v dollars that any president who tackled the us health care from a complex, i presume we also big agriculture will be destroyed by those powerful interest. why do you believe you may be a toad believe a r f k junior level loan? trump will actually survive ahead of the 20th of january next year? well, uh, well 1st i wasn't familiar with that. um, with that quote, uh that's interesting. i'll have to check that, i think it was to be the all about the health care reforms that clinton was going

to make. and he said he expected he expected any president to be found, having sex with children in the cemetery basically because the whole media, everyone would be against any president because of the powerful interest and big pharma that you've written about actually. um yeah, uh, i mean, those all have to look of course the dog was um, you know, since he like, he liked to sensational quote. so i, i, that's one of those things. i definitely need to check for myself. but did you ask, did you just ask me why? i believe the president in our to junior will survive till january 20th. well, obviously that would be an assassination attempt. and you can see already the, the reaction of the liberal media or is it what will they, will they actually survive? i mean, how, how dangerous is right now for the me. do you mean physically survive? you're literally, i think, i think i yeah, i think i probably do actually, i mean, how powerful are big pharma and big agriculture. what i mean,

what do they tried to do to you for the sleep of? respectfully, i think it's quite inappropriate for journalists to speculate about the murder of a president elect for an ally or colleague of here's in advance of a peaceful transfer power. i think it's, you know, i believe it for the, i know it's, i'm not speculating and try to encourage you. i'm saying to illustrate how powerful these interest, uh, and what the stakes are in allowing people to democratically transfer about and to actually do the kinds of changes that have been spoken about of a big pharma, for instance. i mean, i think that it becomes more dangerous when, when the press raises by what possibilities i, i just really strongly encourage you to, you know, rephrase that because i, i don't really want to be, you know, part of the conversation, of course,

but i mean, well threads, parentheses, i mean that's just go back to your but like, how do you know if there's a certain time, i mean, you know, like, how do you know any elected official will survive? how do you know any head of state will survive? these are um, quite a decent place. threatening things to speculate how high of the day, how high the stakes. i mean, i've heard you say that even the, even the election means they will have to attenuate any reaction to uh, uh, how they tackle both the big agriculture and big firm are the same time. and maybe they should do this one more slowly than the other. such a powerful intel is messaging purpose that was advice i gave for a success. and i gave it in public for successful messaging purposes. that if you take on too much at once, and i gave similar advice, which i can't disclose doing an n d a. but you know, every campaign i've ever advised,

i recommended that they take things off to magically. um, you know, take do a week or 2 weeks on agriculture do a week or 2 weeks on farm. i do a week or 2 weeks on literacy and reforming, you know, the school system do a week or 2 weeks on making the iris a leaner and more accountable. it's just about good messaging because if you tackle everything at once and make a lot of scatter shot, very exciting announcements. and then we have a situation in which you and i talking about what's going on are not presented with an obvious theme that we have to, which we have to respond. we're presented with a great deal of information uh, which makes it harder for journalists to cover any one specific themes. so that was my advice about that. it wasn't about to be careful. you know, physically, i mean, every,

every president and every tablet member he takes on powerful interest knows that powerful interest will try to protect their, you know, resources and, but i, i really want to move this conversation to a conversation about the peaceful transfer of power and and, and getting things done in policy terms rather than life or death terms. i, you know, again, i think it's so appropriate to raise that possibility. so i find that papers, for instance, what will we hear as to how they, i mean, i don't know whether our of k juniors read your book, whether they will use the information in that to get some sort of a closure maybe is to at least talk about closure for the use of lives. as regards the pandemic, i really don't know. my dad was

a writer and he said that you know, your responsibility or your kind of uh task with every non fiction book. it will fiction to for that matter, i only write non fiction ends with the final word. it's up to the readers to, you know, make what they will of any book you write. so this is a really important book. we put it out, we published it, which is itself a miracle given the wall of censorship around us or the tried to silence this book, 3 different governments tried to silence this book. there was just a judgement in britain, mark stein, who gave me a platform to bring some of the harms in these reports. before this book was published to a british audience and global audience through g b news, he's just been fined 50000 pounds or tasked with paying that amount for legal fees when he sought to defend his reputation of his career. and i went there also to

support him in court against off. com, their media watchdog agency in britain suppressing the information. i'm not saying it was not true, but saying that it was harmful to reveal the truth about it. and so i hope of course, you know, our volunteers, these 3250 doctors and scientists who have who could have mobilized under our leadership mine and my colleague the me, kelly's to read through the 450000 internal chrysler documents released under a court order, the fda asked the court to keep them hidden for 75 years. the court said no. these volunteers have testified and brought these findings to twice to the australian parliament. and they brought them to the brazilian parliament, which we acted by taking mandates off the table for children with these injections because they're so dangerous and damaged and they brought them into british parliamentary and they brought into senators

a sitting in our own congress. so i certainly hope that you know this, this book and its findings which documents the greatest crime against humanity in recorded history will be, will continue to be used. i think it's a factor in the big judgments you're seeing. i don't have a direct knowledge of that, but you know, what's in the price of papers is now public. it's a map, it's, you know, it's in, you know, medical libraries. it's in my local library and book brooklyn, this book. so you're seeing now since the book came out, multi $1000000.00 judgements in favor of people who were coerced into getting this dangerous knowingly dangerous injection, knowingly sterilizing deadly. in some cases, injection. and you're also seeing multimillion dollar step settlements for people who lost their jobs when they refuse to comply. so, you know, obviously i hope that it continues to have a life in, in litigation and in justice for the victims. and it's

a matter of public record beyond that, i really don't know what will happen. yeah, i mean, this show knows all about off going. they have the latest reports out today. there's the british dentistry of agency where in device so we don't have to worry about that here. but i suppose when this interview perhaps goes on social media, we'll still have a slight worry in covering issues of the size of the papers because we put it up on google's youtube ahead of the selection. yeah, exactly where you could tell me a bit about that, but i had of the trump integration. i mean at least do we look forward to the end of that kind of censorship? industrial complex, i meant how you'd be was on the show, the other day talk about the types of files. so working with the, you know, most of the data. i mean what, what's gonna happen to as a couple guys soon deputy i have google, what do you expect not just related to your work but to, to freedom of speech. yeah, well that's a great question. i'm happy that you asked it. um, it's so ironic, right? i come from the left as you mentioned to me in your introduction, i'm a, i've been

a lifelong democrat and then i walked away and finally endorsed president trump. you know, in lions starkey junior and in advance of the election and encouraged liberals and independents to vote for them. and it's so ironic because the massive groundswell of response, including from the legacy media of my former employer, is the guardian. the fears that that trump euro, trump, or of kate euro will be a fishes take a time of fascism and of course, the suppression of free speech is part of the fascist tool kit. i've been writing about that since my book into the america, which came out in 2008. but paradoxically, the people who censored me and met. so you'd be in michael shaunberger. and you know, professor jay, about a chart of stanford who is making very important points about how locked down. so we're going to drive millions of children into starvation, which they did, professor might include, or for the harvard, any number of serious people,

the people who centered us, who were fishes stick about freedom of speech. where would people i voted for the bite administration, censored me in june of 2021. when i correctly warned women around the world, but especially in the west that women were reporting menstrual dist disorder, serious central disorders, upon receiving december, any injection that was correct. and the price of papers abundantly documents of 360 degree war on human reproduction, which has resulted now in 2024 and a 13 to 20 percent drop in live birds amileon. missing babies in western europe a. her risk sick in, in their charts and pfizer documents of her wrist. they damage that phase or new. they were causing to be the fertility in the man's ease of women. the poisoning of breastmilk, the locking of ovaries with lifted mantle particles,

the compromise of percent is leading to what is now 40 percent rise in life. birth an over 80 percent, miscarriage rate, and one section of the appraiser documents. 2 babies dying in utero in the pregnancy, my case report advisors said was due to maternal exposure that vaccine just went to the white house. and then dr. will, as he told the women of america, there was no bad time to get an injection before your baby was born during your pregnancy or after your baby was born. and so it's, it's even a massive crime. but the people who set up an office of this information and use the stalling is coinage which doesn't exist in a 1st amendment. society missed information and put pressure according to, to attorneys generals lawsuits that you know, have, have it, it resulted in a disclosure of these emails by the white house. it was the white house pressuring tech companies to censor me. he paid my accurate quote warning women about real

damage, which really happened that was the white house that was the bite in white house. so i see that paradoxically, the trump era is likely to be one of aggressive defense is for freedom of speech. i hear that we were just kind of do a break, they'll stop you. the law from the co editor defies the papers. phases, crimes against humanity for this, right? the, the welcome back to going underground. i'm still here with the co editor of the size of papers professor, naomi wolf. so what exactly was the rationale behind publishes no fusing to publish it. and so, and, and for instance, there's english, a british censorship, a complex saying we have to find anyone who talks about revelations in it. well,

what is behind all of these? uh, okay, so 1st of all, no one refused to publish the pfizer papers in united states. we had a lovely offer from sky horse publishing, which is a division of simon schuster. and you can find the price of papers in any local library. you can walk into barnes and noble. you can order from amazon. no one refused to publish it because it is completely accurate. the 2nd thing is, the judgment against mark stein and even the court case, which i peered about. the outcomes action against mark stein's show and acknowledge the judge. acknowledge that it wasn't stating that anything we said was in accurate. it wasn't stating that anything i presented was not true. it was saying that even if it was true, it was harmful to disclose the truth because it could upset people that was there

legal reasoning and you can go to my subject outspoken or get the judgement. it's a matter of public record. and, you know, in the royal courts of justice, so please don't mis characterize. no one has said anything in this book is not true . there's been no resistance to publishing it in the united states around the world . we're getting inquiries from germany and the netherlands, the netherlands has asked a demand at the bill gates as come to court to answer charges. the, you know, after i came with the findings of the advisor papers to the netherlands and, you know, it's, it's simply not accurate that there's been any or discipline, any statement that anything in this book is not correct. the censorship that we do get us from outlets like youtube and certainly all of the british media and certainly all of the legacy media because they don't want to cover it. they don't wanna cover it because the colluded in taking the money to misinform people and

suppress warnings about the dangers of these injections. pardon me? and that's not, that's a legal exposure for those news outlets and the house and how can they be brought to justice under a trump to because clearly the bible harris administrators included just as much as all these censorship uh, high tech companies as well. the whole of western europe, i suppose, is just a, you're just gonna have to say that to one side. they're not going to go the same way, arguably as, what's going to happen in the united states. now, how does he go about it? you need to buy that, excuse me. i don't know what you mean by that, because people who learn the truth about what's in the price of documents all over western europe are very upset and they are wanting their speech rights back and they want their represent to you. there is no, i'm just making the republics where there is a freedom of speech in western europe. you know, rumble is banned outright. and in france a whole, uh, whole context of war is currently being forward. i'm not able to be broadcast about

in britain. so that's why i'm exploring west in europe for now how, but at least the united states as a 1st amendment, and clearly the platform to jump right on was again, censorship. so how does he begin to bring these people to justice as well? i just, you know, i'm not in any advisory role with the trunk campaigns. yeah. i'm not in a position to, to, to, to tell you except as a citizen, but as a citizen, there are many ways to bring these people to justice all around the world, including in western europe, in the middle east, and israel and australia and africa. so 1st of all, the violated international law, because the nuremberg code calls for every you can't do medical experiments on humans without their informed consent. it's, it's completely legal. and that's what pfizer and madana and astrazeneca, the, we don't have materials now. she's going to cause papers, and yet that's what these companies in league with governments around the world

did. they violated people. they violated international law by withholding informed consent from people and engaged in a massive medical experiment on them. so there are other ways to bring them to justice. we have 2 lawsuits. sybil lee, they are, they're liable. right civilly. um, you can sue the fda. you can see the white house and you can see private corporations. and so there, that's the nature of many of the lawsuits that are under way. right now. we've advised one team of criminal attorneys and they're going after. i believe we go crimes and trafficking, or to bleeds trafficking, the bodies of people who were forced to receive the injection. certainly there's fraud involved, you know, one of the criminal offenses. the trees general helped us have looked at is false advertising. which state by state, by state is a criminal offense. a fraud is a criminal offense. they,

they engaged in fraud by not telling people the truth about what was in the injections by say, oh, you might have, you know, pain at the injection site or a fever or fatigue. well, pfizer knew that, you know, tens of thousands of, you know, for $42000.00 less serious adverse events in just 3 months, including $1225.00 depths. and it was a fatigue and shows and painted the injection site. it's strokes and dimensions and all timers and parkinson's and a turbo cancers, and blood clots and lung clots and lake clots. and to embodied throughout the site of p, a and skin disorders of all kinds, kidney damage, liver damage, and you know, the, her wrist stick menstrual and red, productive damage that i described. they knew all of this, you know, catastrophic neurological harms. and now we know the mechanism, right, the price of papers shows people how they were injured. and it's very important because it begins to lay down the basis of a science for real healing, which people are not going to get from their doctors,

because the doctors took the money and complied. and the professional, you know, medical organizations took the money and complied. so those are multiple ways in the united states. you can bring people to justice in britain, there been some law suits by the vaccine insured they've been successful and something that um that are the junior has been talking about. is it ending advertising a direct consumer advertising of pharmaceutical companies to, to people. and that's going to change the landscape tremendously because right now that your television shows use don't cover damage from any pharmaceutical products because there's so much money. their primary advertisers, at least in television, are pharmaceutical ads. but when that becomes, we're one of 2 countries, the world allows that needs the human being the other one. so when, if that becomes unlawful, there's going to be

a lot more coverage of the harms metal support. people who bring civil and criminal charges. so those are just some examples, but, you know, europe, i don't, i don't think you're going to be silenced forever. i think people are going to read the dutch and the german versions that and slaves the pfizer papers, they are available. you can order them in the u. k, from amazon dot u k. and then you're going to see litigation. you're going to see people being perhaps injustice and other booksellers. i bet so much you've written about over the decades. i uh, you know, i would love to ask you about the, uh, the gaza genocide. but um, uh, immigration in the short time we have left you written about how it leads to use integration. and so a bit about the use of most and we use of immigrant labor from us and raise in the past. how. how important is it from a left perspective to talk about the trump agenda in terms of the fact that

immigration is used by populates a note for good reasons? not for anything good. i'm sorry, i'm not sure i understand your question. i apologize. you've written about immigrants use as muscle rates for the military industrial complex in the united states. but how does that fit in with the a trump, i mean, you can hear it all on the so called liberal media or in the united states that the immigration, this is just races the policies of the trump administration. but actually, there are more complex mechanisms of play when it comes to immigration in the united states. tell me why there is a good reason to look at immigration in the united states and that boy will just as trump says that he with i see what you're asking. um, well, just to be clear, i didn't state that illegal immigrants were being used as mercenaries. i was concerned that there's my own and reporting on my subject, outspoken found,

and it's on the white house, you know, website that there is a, a 3 country staging area. where the state department, us, the department of alliance with united nations is bringing in these millions of people, the law. i'm a great united states, sorry, legal legal, know illegal as they are illegally in the united states. in other words, the state department and you in, in these 3 countries where they're being processed are colluding to bring them into united states legally. which to my knowledge has never happened before that the state department has engaged, you know, with the un in breaking sovereign nations laws in that comprehensive way. but you must know that, you know, 19 to 30000000 people are in the united states illegally. they are not legal immigrants, they have walked right in and not gone through the process, which is

a lengthy one that my grandparents went through, for instance, and my dad to become legal immigrants, citizens of the united states. they are illegally here. so my concern was a lot of these people who been brought in illegal li are from countries that produced mercenaries around the world. and i was also concerned that a lot of them are military age. and you know, it's just dangerous to have a lot of people who us, we see as, as i predicted, the, you know, it turns out that it's cartels who are taking over and terrifying the residents of housing complexes in colorado and now in 3 other states. but it's dangerous to have military age. men who are here illegally, who can, you know, communicate to do bad things like take over, you know, housing complex is that is a national security risk and anyone would say, so, you know, if 3000000 people walked in to do by, you know, they,

the stories would be alarms to say the least, they wouldn't let it happen. you can't just, you know, walk into most saw for nations exception, western europe in north america now present and we will thank you. you're welcome. that's it for the show. i continued condolences to those surviving the u. k. u s. u, i'm holocaust here in this region. we'll be back with a brand new episode on saturday until then keep in touch by the social media. if it's not sense in your country and have to our channel going on, the run tv on rumble dot com, don't want you new and old episodes are going undergrads. these have the, the, the, the,

[000:00:00;00] the, yeah, well good. i'll probably better job. i didn't seem to leave refusing to comment on whether he had given ukraine permission to use american long range weapons against russia. republicans, those saying it's this is true. it's an attempt to get rail. donald trump visa on his way out of office j fight and is dangerously trying to stop world war 3 by authorizing ukraine. the use of us long range missiles into russia means on the front of the goals, a decision, a dangerous escalation. it's west and specialist would need to be directly involved in any long range. missed all attacks on a rough entire treat. it goes