Skip to main content

tv   Documentary  RT  November 18, 2024 1:30pm-2:01pm EST

1:30 pm
specials, a wave of the prose, how this thing is, demonstrations has a rough, didn't we, a generic with protests, hit protest is takes into the streets and flags on font as such, monte, not the g 20 immediately stop as well as schools on calls on lebanon. i'm not sure monetary needs be provided to fix them. audit we spoke with the chief editor at opera monday about the ongoing event in for sale, brought out wednesday. was it any discussions about multiple r t will they know by western state? i think it was a to be difficult to move beyond just didn't never do statements on reasonable goals, things. so topics such as the fight against hunger and energy transition. the g 20 composition we've fee is fades in. open come from base and having to decide by consensus, makes practically impossible to reach that career resolutions on the roads main problems with, with the presence of the united states and europe encounters beside jeff. and for
1:31 pm
example, any serious discussion about the past, due building, i'm due to pull a bill, so and sustainable will border is book. it's a may have been this kind of main thing is the see it the, it was many in both and leaders have the missing the have the opportunity. i'll be laughter, a meeting all in a wake. i mean, it's easier to have just kind of mid thing between this, this shapes of government and the state, but i don't think that they did 20. it is more than that. well, from us in the studio, just for the saw, it is provide arguments here on all to press cool, well page strong his team, pick some model. this means american foreign policy. you enjoy
1:32 pm
the the hello and welcome to cross that bull horns. were all things are considered on people about one of the most important victims of politics is personnel is policy. given donald trump's growing list of unorthodox appointments. this difficult to discern what foreign policy his administration will pursue, change or continuity, discuss these issues and more. i'm joined by my guess george samuel, we in buddha. betsy's a pod cast where the goggles which be found on youtube and locals. and here in moscow across to to meet 3, bob, which is that the board editor. it comes to will sky from the daily or i generally cross that bridge that effect, that means you can jump any time you want that. i always appreciate it. okay, well kick it off with georgia in budapest, you know,
1:33 pm
general and i was thinking about, you know, how long we've been talking about donald trump. and i think it would be fair to say that in all 3 of us and many others have at least a bachelor's degree and from studies, maybe others have more advanced degrees. i think george, you may fall into that category. so it should be incumbent upon us to try to figure out what the heck is this man doing because he's been in the spotlight about 10 years now. just think about that gentleman, 10 years, he's been the focus of american politics. so george, when we look at this about of, of appointments and we can talk about individual ones. there just 2 things that they all have in common. loyalty to trump and they seem to be all fanatical israel supporters. what else is going on here? george? oh yeah, you, some of that up perfectly, exactly that the distinctive characteristic of all of these people is loyal dates
1:34 pm
of trump and fanaticism about israel. some of them have come to fanaticism about israel, of a relatively recent place for us as some of the but wouldn't be the director of the national intelligence. it's also yeah, but it was very critical of israel when she ran for president in um 2020 um. what else? so completely the following bar was a team and assume that they will pursue a whole kish foreign policy. it an intervention is then a will like policy. it will, it would be very nice not to do so when you, with the point people like michael's as your national security advisor, mario rubio is your secretary of state. and um, you know, the, the texas as your defense secretary, these are not people that you would expect to preside over a termination of wars. and now some people say, yeah, but it will be trump,
1:35 pm
who was the said policy or metro is the president, was that sponsorship only? and why would you pick these people if what you had in mind was uh, you know, because of the series of peace. and the easiest way to think about this is, well, let's look at the issues like um, there is a way to a oh china. and you buy the cuba, what would you expect the steam to do? and because there's a while ago, say they expect to uh, escalate against man as well. oh yeah. so like, i expect them to escalate against china. so um, what about iran? well, of course, the gonna escalate it gives you around within wise's, and when we come to ukraine, the use of housing that they will pursue a, a peaceful policy on your credit. it doesn't really make uh, very much sense. and you would have to think that this from does not like more. i think we can say, let's say if we get that, he doesn't like, well, however, as who's doing this 1st time, he hasn't quite figured it out. the steps you have to take to pursue peace,
1:36 pm
just sent this thing based throw stripe really means very little entertainment. the judge brings up so many good points here. mean again, there's a loyalty to trump of low loyalty and to, to israel. and then, you know, there are demarco robeto's that are fanatical about ben is way too. okay. and then you're going to have others that are still begrudging. russia, gators and china hawks and all that. i suppose trump can make the claim and we'll see if it hands out that he'll be in charge of his foreign policy unlike he was in there in his 1st term. so, i mean, it's really more and more uncomfortable and focused on one man because trump was, you know, they gave him the runaround when he was my president before. so i don't know if that's good news or bad news with the very reasons. and george says, i mean he's against the war but he doesn't know how to make peace, fema. well, that's exactly true. he doesn't want costly looks. i mean,
1:37 pm
he's not the days she was that you're going to win easy, you know, you probably saw that there were days there are these that the sister would be such a war, but thank god yeah. in the and she decided not to go there. but the real problem is that she doesn't quite understand who he is and he was on the goals of them were rags. wondering if there are no, you know, there are a special new guy adults does that. i do. it's avenue. this sounds are the only person with the logic involved. he is a new iphone to use those folks. the barber. i mean, she went for war in iraq. wow. all right, because you're going to, you know, why? because she saw the, there is that stuff. the 1000 want and she's a single girl, religion these seem to is. so she's absolutely right about this one is not a about this one is being violence, you know, uh, organizing terry stairs. and that is the fact that these folks can see to see new
1:38 pm
people and, and those are the groups impressed even fewer but the appropriate lease for that that here. and so this alter liberal ideology which is prevailing. no indian by that means patient in the or b, we have these people view a huge part of human. you're asking people what all the people, even in the sole goal focus is if you, if you listen to what, uh, a bite is people and what the leaders of your being a congress to say about them. they regarded as some calling people. of course, they will tell you the email and you want me straight into your id and logically, really, exactly, you know, more apartment, if you ask the your be in need us. if you was, why the level of course, the gaze, russians learn what they gains the and gary is i don't think it is chinese. they just crap will become democrats that have been able to do what we're saying. but
1:39 pm
that's exactly what this promised me tell me about. he goes, why don't they receive those? they just crept to convert 3 islam, and then you know, they will be regarded as sold to eat. both was but both the guy with but what in the product and she saw how that ideology. i mean that i was able to like look, it destroys people, you know, most lambs and grease jams just for the stable regime g. so her position is very want to go. she called herself the more days there is a and the dog in the was for, is even change about the, you know, most of the war started by the united states. and by that is the, is your b and i watch and by you do, these are what, what do you mean, jake, you know why the, what you see read and fox, the governor wasn't absolutely right. to say that it was i called crazy to support the forces that you're at the states supported can see that they supported you. slip is a sprint. the awesome. and she was barely more difficult when she met her with the
1:40 pm
1070 there. when she refused to apologize, oh, what work is there a fee or some just the reaction or what you were being brass and we're being lead us to the voicemail stacy bar. but and if you are the people in the drums, uh uh, these patients, uh, let me just quote with some of the headlights. it's a, it's a reasonable concern. you know, the, this is wally. so this is why i saw that there was a woman in terms of this patient globally says, fees for piece. okay, well that, hang on there. okay. so you can jump into those that can take a few questions and combine them for george here. well, a plus for chelsea gabbert is that she's not part of the foreign policy blog. that's why there's so much resistance to her. and then there's the issue of qualification that's all over the place. well, look at the buying in ministration. looking at his cabinet, what qualifications the lease people have? okay. i mean it's really quite extraordinary. marco rubio, the p takes up, i mean,
1:41 pm
was a tb increment wrong. reagan was an actor. i mean, i'm on trying to denigrate or support any of these people here, but i don't really think this is the issue. it play qualification, stuart? no, it is. that is one of these completely bogus arguments that people trial that wow, you know, or the real issue is lack of qualifications to post the big issue. she actually, so she served in the military. she has taken a consistent interest in matters of intelligence and secure with any rate if you were to ask, well what's, what's the thing, what's issues? or i think it's been foreign policy, a critique of american foreign policy, and intervention is on the, the problem with the lowercase is that she will be in the business of, um, coordinating intelligence. so she wouldn't actually be running an agency. i mean,
1:42 pm
surely, colleagues in information for only intelligence ages, is them presenting them to the president. but the people with the power will be the people who actually run the agencies. so this, he said, all his be in charge of 18 intelligence ages where she wouldn't really be in charge of the agents that you see, or just simply collect information present to them and present the findings to the president. so she wouldn't actually be in the policy making role of living that, that, that uh, on the cops that can, you know. but the problem with the, the immediate national security team is that, you know, then they want over the past few months to sound like chrome. the guy did this on the battery about it. you know, those people say, well, yes, what you know, monk or ruby a voted against the 100000000000 dollar package where ukraine and israel n n e z. yes,
1:43 pm
he did vote against that. but what was the reason the site that it's not a position to the policy on your brain, but the thing, well, it wasn't enough allow me for the border. you know, that's the, you know, the, it's the bought of also ruby on you that as what you call said both, then it would possible, well, mainly in the senate. so the vote really didn't mean anything is all i getting anything dependent on his vote. the same thing with mike wills, also his critique of the, by the ministration of have been that it's not doing enough. it's, it's, it's through soft on uh, on both team. so when he also voted against the, is the sending more money to do. it wasn't because, you know, i think this is wish we should read it because you'll be bring this know in. and here's what labels really look well by ministration, who's already handling this properly? search on actually be doing more survey for leasing, giving, setting out an agenda. so we telling us exactly what it's intense. so it's a cop out. it's a hit. so it gets in this on his response just like this, like,
1:44 pm
you know why? my only problem is the lack of bull as occasion. you know, the person is lying and isn't telling you why he's opposed to something near to god remember before we go to the break here and the rest of gates is made. its appearance again apparently tells it, does the gap or it is a in pools of pocket. we heard this from a sitting member of the car where so who used to be a spoke or so. so rest of the game is also ins. id my uh, nothing surprising about that. uh, you know, the idea, what would you just know? who is the night states? it is the 3rd there is because, but natalie page is all was impressed on the 4th for an intervention that stayed at ups. you know, clearly poor these, it was the wrong person around a gaze problem. it was not that they basically destroyed the point in me that they tended old in to steeple china and other batteries. so it was just the process or see or to clean up. now is the process, what kind of a high speed would be bob, something like that. and again, and again is
1:45 pm
a rush. it needs one says that in what was the last 2 social networks there, people are everywhere long. it'll always be a default position for failure. gentleman, i'm going to jump in here. we're going to go to a short break. and after that short break, we'll continue our discussion. and so really stay with our to the russian states. never as tight as i'm sort of the most sense community not getting hold of all sense and the speed the one else calls question about this, even though we will ben in the european union, the kremlin media machine, the state on the russians to day and switch the ortiz full neck, even our video agency, roughly all the band on youtube. the question,
1:46 pm
did you say they requested the welcome active prospect boulevard. a funeral bell here were discussing some realist, george, it's a discussion you and i have had in the past multiple times. and i think that we see in intentional fusion or to blur um, what is neil con and its out? well, in the, in the outlook your new accounts and america 1st, people like mark old rubio. they're trying to fuse them together. and i think that is intellectually morally dishonest. george. well, that's exactly right. because of course, america 1st. um, originally meant in the,
1:47 pm
in the, in the charles lindbergh sans and this sort of a fact you can, it'll been an updated. it's a back in the 1980 is the america of us man. that who should pursue a policy that is in the den, 1st of the united states, but not in the interest of any other country. and that therefore, the united states should not be undertaking all kinds of interventions and commitments that so know all this american interest. um and the now the how the so is trans muted entity and like in the minds of the various from acolytes, is that, well america just gets to do whatever a one's without any hindrance or any one else. so what could we continue to do everything that we have been doing before? um, but we now say that it's just about america and then the little, it's just an out in our interest. and everyone else can just simply bought though. and i think that's, let's say, you know,
1:48 pm
the various people still know of taking this america 1st the label to themselves, readings of the advocates. so that's why, you know, you get people like making any lives or you know, on, on the right the 1st, you know, um, but, but, you know, you'll be probably supporting israel. i'm everything you this or is all. yeah. well, of course, everything is that's a good for is rarely is good for america. so therefore when i, when i, when everything goes fraser, oh, i'm of course advocating. and america 1st policy. and i think that's really the permit is to all these people with a wall. so rubio takes, it will say, yeah, we're doing america 1st and but what it, what about all these was the human can now to escalate in order to assume something or oh, well that's, yeah that's, that's a america of us. so it's a deeply dishonest exercise in order to reassure chrome of the drum support is that yeah, yeah we're, we're on board for this. yeah, that's the way we're definitely, you know. no, no, no more of these. um, uh stupid was a phone call. somebody else will have stupid, was that
1:49 pm
a for america 1st? you know, the value of much of the discussion about, but the future cabinet into another positions of the next administration. maybe you kind of all load because, you know, there's a, what i call been and been minute been minutes. um, where you have the, um, uh, interagency can set consensus. that's gonna be very, very hard to fight against. okay. i mean, p takes as well, you know, popular tv guy. and i mean, well, the more power to them but to be able to control the largest single bureaucracy in the world with that, with them budgeted but truly in dollars. if you think it would take him for years to learn how to run the place, let alone run it from day one, because the layers and layers of the mazda of bureaucracy, they just have a life of their own existence of their own. all of these political actors are going
1:50 pm
to have to face the same thing. the case of the pentagon, which is much bigger, fema. uh, well, yeah, true. and it seems as to how, what do i do these appointments? i take them away the heck. so he's a cultural warrior. why should the cultural warrior have the defense department? because the defense department has been basically violated by cultural awareness from the other side. i mean, we have seen how the media to you where you, where me move, you know, she will know that old won't bite beach at the same story with my the gates. i mean, she's a great monopoly. uh, and this is very american to be at this moment, but i'm going to give examples in what ways do you think it is for nobody but the main monopoly united states though is i don't want to go, you've only of the democrats, if only the liberals are they carry as a web some post? so you have
1:51 pm
a monopoly and i told you why not kind of monopoly either one of your final cabinets in government contracts. it is the just the same logic everywhere. but just to explain my position, maybe it will be interesting for all of yours. if i think if i tell you about the russian buell oaks. okay. i mean, when i see that people, even a coke receives or statement to talk with you regarding this in your i, i, i wasn't thinking i attended the focus of ration speak recent the most when people from across from region from germany, right. se, brush and spanish from there, they tell me story is how they're bank. it's all a special though, even though they were, for example, for french teachers on german see just simply because they had rush and sick and they already were c 2. so a lot of them, a women from rush from the every single because you are so pray, she saw them the so close, so russian,
1:52 pm
so when they stop down for baskets on before the prostate because they truly lead bank. i am rushing now bro. those days and you can see them in be or because of your i don't you because the sportage and for crow, it was the notion because she graduated from the high school we put on the spot of the most liberal education with students in russia. and she wanted to be able to ship a whole channel and saw that she saw these that you're still in your, you wouldn't even, uh, even if you're never frustrated, you find the name of this, this liberalism as it exists in the west. now it's just the for, i'm as a, a warm and fuzzy version of authoritarianism and we all know that they have a different theme. you know, it doesn't come with a jack booty comes with the pad on the, on the back. george, there's a real important issue here because as i started out, we're all kind of students from this. and if we like it or not, you're,
1:53 pm
we're all hoarse to be. i strongly believe the legacy is gonna play a very big role in trumps. mind the seamless bar we all know that he won't be running for another term that sees easy to remarkable position of day one. he's a lame duck, and as we all know, that he respects who has a 1st or 2nd term. you got a window of about 18 months to make to leave your mark. okay. and i, i have to hold considering the motley crue that he's gonna have around him, but he's good, his, what history to be trying to him? what do you think he's going to do thinking that way? well i, i absolutely great i, i do think that he wants to bring up the tools that america is involved in the, to a swift conclusion. the problem is he doesn't really know how is going to do it, and he hasn't really put these together a team that. so i did to achieve another i think comp sense is that the way you
1:54 pm
get to bees is by token grades off prices. and everybody and then they know everybody's their days. oh yeah. yeah. where where's the document? let me just sign on the dotted line. the last thing i want this to be up against this crazy man in the white house. and i think that so that's a very dangerous um position to today because i, you know, i, i do think that when it comes to the ukraine, i think he is going to present a piece plan. something along the lines we've talked about before, something that is being offered a set out in various newspaper articles. i think it'll be unacceptable. i don't think i, i don't think your brain will accept them. i don't think russia will accept it. and then he's gonna have to decide what to do next. and i think that he will then escalade. another thing becomes very dangerous because uh you have a good day. you could just take it a step while we know that truckers don't dangerous things in the past and like,
1:55 pm
you know, the is besides the relation of the general solemn ami. um they get them again on the on another surface. uh so, um do you know that that's the have somebody at the behest of another country at the behest of another country and you've gone and, and particularly now as we've seen the kind of a reckless things of israel was done with carrying out assassinations again, you kind of one that is this something else that's on the cards, you know, trump, things that have, let me just, you know, escalate by doing something as dangerous and resurrect with as a, carrying out on the fascination. you know, he never consult. lemme easy isn't material. so he does take a risk and i think that's really the problem and that's the same thing with them. is royal. i think he could easily think of any of that. the adults are very dangerous balls. they think it's like, well this is the, the fastest way to get the fees. there's do something really dangerous way. exactly . he's like, well that's, that's, i think that's, that, that's a real comes sucks. you know, it's,
1:56 pm
they got away with it in the box like the they got to wait with the generals of money next time. you may not be able to get away with it. you know, de la vladimir putin has dealt with. we do a back a half it technically to bill it from bill clinton. i mean that who gives me add the transition there? george w bush, i brock obama, donald trump, joe biden, and then get now again, donald trump. how does the russian leadership see american presidents? well, i mean, i guess maybe surprised, but we have a lot then it goes this slogan, america 1st. that's no one on one to. but don't expect me to be loved by and that you know, we can provide for ourselves. we know it now we have the ability to focus in that way a just 39 just so we know that we can provide for all. so thanks to the same. so we've done several americans 1st. this is quite okay with us, you know about, oh,
1:57 pm
but we just had a good relationship with george w bush despite the warranty. sure i did before on george w bush, most of okay, your country. we have one program, but what was the problem is when you start to pete, you're bringing naturalistic gage bush when you start to make for us. so i'm going to bob the cost of bush. when you can see the russians need in the baltics, what you will be as large as in your then we have a book. and that's was unfortunately very, very typical for obama and so by them. and that's why a relationship with a bite on so solid, the ones from what was from the very beginning. but again, i'm afraid by the same paradigm. now, usually, when the new president comes to ball afresh, one with our special voting to oldest, you bo was says, i'm going to my relationship with russia. you know, that was the case with a bomb. you remember that you said that was like a human was by the remember that so i'm going to be we're, you know,
1:58 pm
which of them the, by the meet you need, you need what it was also the beginning of the comes for us to remember the assignment didn't coast in the dim lights by the real grass. so it's all was the same, but at the beginning and then more and more each ones this probably, well i agree maybe add maybe not a good beginning, but it tennyson's or the intensive moving dentist don't seem to be. and then by law we on the back, we'll kinda end on this uh, we said the united states and russia is don't have to be friends, but they really ship them to be enemies. okay. i want to thank my guess here in moscow and in budapest, and of course i want to thank our viewers for watching us here at our dc and next time. remember about cycles, the
1:59 pm
who, when i want to show the wrong just don't have to shape house and engagement because the trails when so many find themselves will support. we choose to look for common ground, the to take a fresh look around this life kaleidoscopic isn't just a shifted reality distortion by power to division with no real opinions. fixtures, design to simplify will confuse really once a better wills, and is it just as it shows you fractured images, present it is, but can you see through their illusion going underground can
2:00 pm
the, the years foreign part of the chief couldn't fund that? the us has, especially this, the rise of kids and dogs to long range missile strikes against russia. this is an unprecedented escalation of tensions. i told the slow bank republics, ministers of foreign affairs and defense not to support the us decision at any international form or in any other way. a move dustin to took back fire, not the view of southern europe at mountains and some sort of washington, 3 nights several people are killed and thousands more wounded and in this radio strike talk. seeing nothing in the national capital, the e u. we expand this times.

9 Views

info Stream Only

Uploaded by TV Archive on