the, the, we use for him, one of the chief couldn't funds up the us has of officially authorized you, prayed to conduct a long range missile strikes against russia. the washington shrugs of concerns insisting it has no policies for guarding the conflict. this is an unprecedented escalation of tensions. i told the slay bank republics, ministers of foreign affairs of defense not to support the us decision at any international for him or in any other way. and the, destined to $55.00. that's the view of common europe permit. mounting concerns o 5, washington keeping the kids about how long several people are chosen. dogs of move wounded in an id after tax targeting nothing in capital. meanwhile,

a massive plays a rob during the has the last strike on the major is really fits the old instead of the you expansive sanctions against iran, pulling out a case and that fee is nomic for public has decided to minutes rocks the low from most folks myself, the whole team here at our age could very well welcome to the program. it's good to have you with us. but also story of this, our stumped unapproved by washington. they use top a different lot. which is a bro, how's officially confirmed? the white house is allowing ukraine to use western supply missiles for long range strikes against russia. was companies just 2 months before the by didn't administration vacate 0, but office and hands over the keys to donald trump. i know you said some by then

the by the administration has authorized the use of its weapons up to 300 kilometers inside russian territory. it's not that much by way of a distance. it's not a very long distance and it doesn't go deep into the country. but this is a decision by the, by the administration. why they have taken this decision now and not before the elections. i don't know. the white house has been really tight lipped about this since this became an issue around the world. i mean, in the few of the statements that we have heard so far have been little more than either. then pretty much refusals to either confirm or deny anything that's being said in the media or by politicians like us we have is from the state department of course, which again hasn't really yielded any sort of decisive information. can you tell us about the, what the current policy is on whether you crank and launch long range missile strikes and to interrupt, you know,

using us ms. i don't have any policy updates to speak to today. we have made clear that we will always adapt and adjust the capabilities that we provide to ukraine when it's appropriate to do so. and you've seen us back that up with steps that we have taken over the past several years. but i don't have any new policy to speak to that. this, of course comes after the new york times published a report on sunday, citing anonymous officials were apparently claiming that the white house has given the key of a green light to use long range attack. them's missiles to strike deep within russian territory, and when president biden was actually asked to confirm or deny this, his response was to turn around and say absolutely nothing. i mean, it's interesting. so we have the foreign policy chief, see me, a confirming something that you've just talked us through the us as being a bit shady about uh from said that already considering it the you k also is a bit hesitant. is this just lack of coordination at this stage? it definitely seems that way because it wasn't long until we saw more media reports

specifically about fran us and the u. k. green lighting key up to use their scouts and storm shadow missiles for deep strikes on russian territory as well. but again, pretty similar situation. officials from both those countries have either declined to comment, or they've said that there hasn't been any sort of definitive decision made on that yet. what are we hearing within the european broke at this stage? has there been any reaction to this news? well, there have been some reactions and it's been quite a mixed bag because of course the one hand we've heard from. so lock is prime minister who said he completely disagrees with a bind administration's decision. and he said that this could lead to an unprecedented escalation of the conflict. so you have to be enforced in your sofa. i express my sincere disagreement with the decision of us president biden, to allow the use of american rockets to target the territory of the russian federation. with a clear goal of completely eroding or dividing peacekeeping efforts. i told the slo,

back republics, ministers of foreign affairs and defense not to support the us decision at any international form or in any other way. this is an unprecedented escalation of intentions. it is surprising how quickly some you countries welcome miss middleton step by the us. this is already confirmation that the you is unable to formulate its own fundamental foreign policy. and the west wants to continue the war and ukraine at the cost this year. a decision by the outgoing us president boynton, also significantly impact the plans of the incoming president. trump, exactly was publicly expressed interest in ending the war in ukraine. slovakia is ukraine's neva and has an existential national state interest in peace and ukrainian p who wishes to continue the will and welcomes the useless militant steps of the west. palms this low back national state in transport could have you as president biden's clear cut position, a bubble homes. ukraine itself for how they would say, well, i'm ready to go at the same time. other european leaders have essentially come out and complete support of the white house,

like germany's foreign minister and the polish president. they both have essentially, already justified washington's actions a little over here in light of the recent decision from the us. usually i want to emphasize that this is not a reevaluation, but rather an intensification of the support already provided by other partners. and it is crucial at this moment. flossing, d, a salt, okay? so these are missiles that have a range of up to 300 kilometers. these are not the kind of missiles that can hit targets, such as st. petersburg or moscow or other large cities remote from ukraine. these are not the kind of missiles that can be used across russia. i mean, we've heard in the pos, from the russian meta how he would see such a green light. i mean, it was pretty obvious, but he said that this would be a red line that would just for the most code be complete. it'd be on crossing. has that been recently any reaction? absolutely, i mean, most cows warned washington time and time again about taking

a decision like this. we heard from vladimir putin at one point saying that this would be considered a serious threat for russia. we've heard from russia the russian foreign ministry spokeswoman murray is a harbor who said that russian would likely have to commit to a tit for tat response to this. but most recently, we heard from the kremlin spokes person to meet your pest. bob, who said that the west would be squarely to blame for any ukrainian strikes deep on russian territory using western weaponry. the control done and then there should be ok, you the strikes are not carried out by ukraine's these strikes are carried out by those countries that give permission targeting and other services are not carried out by the ukrainian military. this is done by military specialists from the same western countries, and this fundamentally changes the modality of their involvement in the conflict. this is the danger and publication of the situation. now, it's important, we don't forget something else. the russian president,

at one point said as well that he believes that russia has the right to respond in kinds to strikes on russian territory that the government believes to be the fault of the west. so if this is all actually very true, i mean, this would be an escalation to the conflict of it in terms of proportions that we have not seen until the final on this. let's close live now. it's chris to how long the international sex shields the american communist party. welcome to the program . um i, you know what, i'm really sorry. could spot like i want to an all sound check. we put the un security council. we think we're just going to close to that and then we'll get back. she feel reaction. so rushes representative is picking up the un security council up system. christopher bear with us is there is certain symbolism in the fax out of date of birth. oh, british clinic, so presiding over the security council of this month, who forced to through the meeting today,

the timing it to coincide to 1000 j mark since the ukrainian crisis region to help to face. we had once again an opportunity to see that for you and your colleagues. this is nothing more than just a good media opportunity to demonize russia to place try to labels on it. the kinds of labels to that, to your statement, met, statements by western colleagues, predictably teamed with and in your country, your k. russell phobia has long before 2020 to made the rest of the state policy. please allow me to remind you of that as well as preparing to a meeting today. you must have another media opportunity and it has a much more importance and the context of the ukrainian crisis. and the date you chose last friday on the 15th of november was exactly 950 days since the

moment to the former prime minister of the cable, or as johnson district care of there he and we know that for a fact now dissuade the head of the camp regime from signing a stumble piece agreement with russia, which has already been initialized that would have stopped the hostilities at the time. we were very close to it to add as a good will gesture. russia even withdrew its troops when we're north of ukraine, in particular from areas near k of in other words, 50 days after the start with the special knows your operation where the law says enough that you're creating an armed forces were not as yet to. that's significant, the hostilities had every chance of ending if it hasn't been for the interference of the british prime minister. so convinced investigate that she should continue fighting that he would have watched and support and weaponry time. he was us, be able to inflict strategic defeat on russia to the british prime

minister and his accomplices were very much interested in such defeat. because i'm so as to explain this kind of shift. so they crania, and the public opinion they bridge or spits special forces and mass media participated in staging accrued publication in boucher vera. after the russian forces withdrawal deeply people's corpses were broad and arranged on the streets there and the forage and the real reason for death. no one father to explain to us just by the fact that we ask for it several times. in other words, it turns out that the u. k. pushed to cambridge him towards it's inevitable defeat to precipitating its choice to for confrontation with the russian continue. i don't think that you can belong. remember the fact that it's because of these actions on the part of your country, ukraine today isn't a terrible economic stay to that. a last most of us army and materials and all so

last, at least 4 or what's the regents in addition to what was lost in 2014 when crimea left ukraine. the ukraine use have long stopped wanting to find what a volunteer looks like. they are great in the army has not known for 2 years now. the cambridge stream bound to man's leaving from the country and they said they are catching those people who are a fading dropped on the streets using the fire arms and then throwing these people into a sense. let's meet the grinder the eastern for until the ukrainian armed forces ended on both is collapsing or you know, very well with the right to the progress of our army is and is a landscape regime is, was trying to keep the western support on, on to, to consensus incursion into the course, god bless, tried to capture and mine, of course, and, and p, p. and this resulted in the loss of tens of thousands of troops, dismiss, adventure was afraid to error and accelerated the ukrainian defeat. they will not

be spared from the creed, no matter what kind of western rep or, and great bay given the initiators of the meeting today, as a matter of transparency, should have told us about the extra nomic of profits for u. k. received over the 3 years of motor support to explain how on the blood and tragedy of ukraine use. your arms, manufacturer is big games will fit in your defense industry used up it's old material which have to be disposed of in any event. i shouldn't panels. so it would have been good if you were told this about the corruption accompanying this on the scale of the corruption something and we can only guess the ukrainian mass media themselves. i saying that after donald trump's election victory, there was a panic against the months ukrainian, the lead. i know it because the united states can revise the assistance of ukraine . but because a new administration would want to take a look at all of the monies that had been sent to ukraine and conduct a full audit over the assistance already provided. basically the scenario as being

said by the crane and experts is far more frightening for us a landscape business because of the considerable share of assistance is stolen or pocketed by the expired ukrainian president and his entourage. to take into account of the amount of just military assistance by u. k. since 2022 r and the amount of 9700000000 years dollars. given that we can say that your contribution to the corruption ukraine was certainly made by your country as well. will probably not to end up seeing any kind of one investigation vibrators with doherty's big cause. in such cases, what is important is investigation just to make sure you don't end up like using yourself the mission to be president for those to know the history of the u. k. the country that is the history of your country. it's so long term and difference in your brain which culminated in the actions i just mentioned. this has not been

around the revelation pitching neighbors against each other so into scored during people's and countries and been supporting one against each other is something very u. k. relish to doing very well for centuries. here was one of your former colonies control about this and colorful detail to find the way out of 100. in the 93 you and member states only 22 can boast. the, the trip territory has never been invited by or fault with the great britain. and my country is not an exception. here on the last such invasion was a british intervention. following the revolution of 1917, when they were attempts to tear russia apart by various predators and vultures, by the way, prevailed, we went through the hardship grew stronger and now off by doing another in direct intervention by the members of nature who are fighting russia in ukraine and this includes u. k. this is how one views not only the continued pumping of the key approaching

and with weapons and intelligence, but also the presence of british instructors and mercenaries. hundreds of them already eliminated. and the attempts to bring to your credit by bridge, a specialist o b, y b miss o m c drone manufacturing. 6. when this is done to the u. k, in the 21st century, also finds it very difficult to leave ukraine and russia alone because of the dna of those colonizer who reeked havoc in asia, africa, in, in europe, for centuries. very well in you. we know that the british empire brutally put down the resistance of this call is colonies in hundreds of years used force to simulation, racial discrimination, forgetting about human values and the rights of peoples, the peaceful citizens of cold in those countries paid for their life. and freedom for the imperial ambitions. suffice it to recall the ethnic cleansing an ireland where out of 1500000 people on the 850000 were left off to the bridge conquests.

during the 2nd for a war, at the turn of the 20th century was the english for the 1st invented concentration camps. they drove civilians so that to make sure they wouldn't help them or army. how many people perish there and nobody knows because they were interested in seeing didn't count the indigenous people as human and didn't document document their losses and monthly on for customers. would you know though there's that in kenya after they might allow rebellion? they were mass prosecutions, 300000 people, died 1500000 put into camps and made into slaves in india. where during the period of the british colonialism what was done, enormous damage, a 100 was engineered as a result of which 15 to 29000000 people died. the consequences of the actions of the former colonized. there's just something that can be found in the world today. and even though colonial empires are a thing of the past, the old methods pressure,

manipulation, interference continued being used in new ways. that means is bored. news is not an exception. he is rather trends such as m today up through the phantom pains for the empire of, for which this i'm never used to set longing for a last dominion today using to get to the with a like minded franco sacs and friends. blackmail sanctions over throws out of favor regimes through color revolutions, and one victim of such evolution was of ukraine in 2014. and i'm saying all of this to show that there is no moral rights to accuse a blame of my country doesn't exist when we set ourselves a goal of getting rid of the new nationalist and new nazi hornets nest in our borders. there is no such rights until such time as the threat to emanating from it, including the absorption of your brain by not nature are not removed until there's

discrimination of russian speaking peoples because of their faith in history until ukraine continues whitewash and glorifying hitler's accomplices until such time of special operation will continue as goals will be implemented in any event, diplomatically or militarily, regardless of whatever piece plans and schemes are being developed in the west in the interest of saving the actor, entertainment excellence, zalinski and his creek. and independently of the militarist acting of democratic administration, which has suffered a humiliating defeat in presidential election last the trust of most of us population is now. so it should do sharing according to the mass media, suicidal permissions to the landscape, to use long range weapons to strike inside russia. perhaps job item for many reasons has nothing to pull up to lose. but we are astounded by the short sightedness of the leadership of you can prize. they are eager to play into the hands of the existing administration and dragging,

not just comes their countries by the anti europe and to large scale escalation was drastic consequences. and that is what our former western country should think very hard about. also those who start to think about freezing the front lines. so need to think about a priest the front lines along the minutes of agreements rejected by ukraine. and is western mentors don't waste your time. we don't have any confidence in that. we will only accept that kind of decision which remove the root causes of the crisis and will not allow it to happen again. that's what defeating russia on the battlefield. i suggest that you abandoned this idea. europe has tried this several times, and the outcome of each such attempt is well known to you. i thank you. well, we had a cindy in the bed and sailed the russian. i'm boss to the, to the new one on the 1000 day on of us 3 of the start of the who in

ukraine. really short and sweet talking about how wash will apps me keep watching both militarily and took plastic the until. oh, of most of those goals uh uh, reached a very interesting tools. a lot about uh do you pay approach which is funded? when was $10000000000.00 worth of weaponry and aid that has gone to ukraine and said, but of course, this is all part of the history of london with its new colonialist sympathies. what i want to do now is crossing back to christmas a lot. he's been very patiently waiting for us chris finale international section of the american populace politic crestwood. thank you so much. um, the 1st thing i would try once talk about thought the english triangle by the bends . yeah, i mean, not believable number. he said 22, only 22 of a 193 in your countries have not been and they did

a fault with the u. k. and yet, about an hour ago the us, i'm busted you and was saying no country security concerns, give it the right to dictate another country's policies. last load and said, well, next, another countries, territory of these 2 nations, you should be talking about that kind of thing. a hi, it's definitely not. does that to the people in afghanistan near doc, instead of b, i in libya. see the, uh, the, the, the list is quite long uh for this. and if we go back even further in july, in guatemala and you'd on, etc, i think of course the listening to you, an investor of the russian federation the bends. yeah. of course, he gives the history less than and to give the less to them that is necessary for especially the western powers to hear. because so often they have a historical amnesia to what is going on that this did not start in 2022.

i normally really start in 2014, it started much earlier than that. and that the policies and the ongoing drives of the united kingdom of the united states and other countries who continue to point the finger at the russian federation. their aims have been quite clear for many decades, and in fact, for centuries, going back to the colonial period, their, their own goals stated, it's a fact has been of course, the ongoing control of natural resources, the ongoing control politically speaking, for countries for their own national security, the nation for the nation has not done anything like this. and so of course, it's very important to push back against these false narratives. somehow that russia has invaded ukraine for its own objectives of expanding. know that actually that the nation isn't interested in expansion. but the united kingdom in united states are very interested in expensive, and that's been ongoing for, for a long time now. so i think that these kinds of history lessons are critical for

the world to here. and i believe it, the world understands who's in the right and who's in the wrong given the long history of empires, where the sun never set, uh and how they want to maintain that in the years to come in a he also and events he had talked about how problems victory was a humiliating defeat for the establishment. and he said, and now this establishment on its way out is signing up suicide to lee. that was the, was that he used to signing off on long range missiles. so to you have to use on russian soil chasing suicide is the right. what the do you think that the us is striking europe into a very dangerous conflict? absolutely, absolutely, and this has been a red line that the russian federation has made very clear for many months now. in fact, a well over a year that the authorization of the use of long range missiles targeting the russian federation surgery is a grave escalations. and ultimately,

as has been noted by the russian federations spokespeople and by the government itself, the targeting of russian military installations, russian civilian centers, any key assets that the ukrainians want to target with these americans supplied missiles. the intelligence for those targeting systems will need to come from the united states and other western countries. the ukrainians did not have the capability to use advanced satellite resources. they have to rely on western backers to provide that intelligence. and so therefore, it ultimately means that now it is open and transparent that they are active. that western countries, including united states, are active in hostilities against the russian federation. and that has been a long time red line. so i think that this is not only suicidal. this is bringing us to mutually assured destruction once more. and of course, that comes on the hill of trump's historic victory winning both the popular vote

and the electoral college in the united states just 2 weeks ago. so i think that this is very serious and something that needs to be stopped as quickly as possible . can i? i also want to quickly show you a sound bite of what the u. k is representative, set up a security council meeting, but i do let me be crystal clear. that is no equivalence, no comparison, no power though, between those reckless states who support russia's illegal aggression and those who stand with ukraine in defense, if it's something to i mean, what's your take on that? i mean, obviously people say things the way that they want to see things, but to basically condemn, you know, 87 percent of the world, which for example, has not sanctioned russia. and then paint yourself as the good guy. i mean, i think a lot of countries around the world will take issue with thoughts. yeah,

absolutely not to mention the long history of the british imperialism in british colonialism and the, and the 10s of millions who died under the crowns rule. i mean, let's be, let's be honest, nobody, nobody was a, using this type of a rhetoric when the british helped to the americans and other nato partners to separate cost, the vote from serbia and cost of a is. so it'd be in territory. but they legally allowed it to be severed and supported some of the most heinous criminal group. and nobody talked about this with the other illegal invasions, so it's a real, it shows the bankruptcy and the hypocrisy. but most of the world understands and stands with russia, because they know that russia has not been a belligerent actor on the international stage. in fact, it was the restaurant and the former soviet union that stood against the imperialism of the west to provide for the liberation of countries in asia, africa, and latin america. so let's be clear about who has the right and who is justified

here. and it is not the u. k, nor the us, nor any other western power which stand on a heap of skulls and blood. chris fell on the international, secure to a secretary of the american communist party, sucking not missing his was. neither was the button. so for that my to christopher, thank you very much for your time and your patience. be appreciated. thank you. of your security council wages also revealed some tensions between the us and china as washington. is that in void demanded? the beijing seize any support from oscar? again, call on another permanent member of this council, china to stop stoping war on the european continent to end enabling russia's war effort to cease providing dual use goods to russia. and to quit parroting russia russian talking points to justify this war. because there is no justification,

is what i just now english statement. the 1st statement, the us representative, once again, slander. and it's me, it's china shifting the blame to china, which we firmly opposed of previous meetings. i have responded firmly on many occasions. i will not repeat them today. i just want to briefly point out here that the outbreak and continuation of the war of the prizes in ukraine has a lot to do with the united states. would that there can be an a lacy's via, and a political settlement in the future will also, it depends to a considerable extent of the attitude and actions of the united states. we hope that the us behavior will stand the judgment of future generations and the test of history while about as of finding all for, for this all, thanks as always for choosing all the international, you can check out on those tours punch more. besides the overall team dot com

updates allows of the day to cease the hello and welcome to the cross stuff boulevard. here we discussed some we'll in the morning for the settled yet. so as the show.