welcome back to going underground, broadcasting all around the world from the u. e. as we continue to cover the try and 5th, trump as well as leaders from the g. 20 gavin today in brazil, the impacts of the tragedy of 4 years of genocide. joe, all across terrace will be kids and know nato members as the and i lation of guys that continues and u. k. u. s. you, um, is writing down no telling me on ballast time, but on lebanon, yemen and iraq. western european economies based disaster for the proxy war on russia through ukraine. internally, a class divided usa all you'll be lies in ruins. should we even really be surprised that those known for progressive use on some issues like joe rogan, or if k junior dentist can finish a band and the democrats, 3rd wave feminist professor naomi wolf, abandoned them. and she advised about bill clinton and al gore presidential campaigns, the best selling off of the b team at the end of america. and most recently defies the papers. phases, crimes against humanity, joins we now from new york. nearly thanks so much for coming on the show. happy

birthday for last week. you know, it was one of america's greatest historians go over the dollars that any president who tackle the us health care from a complex, i presume we also big agriculture will be destroyed by those powerful interest. why do you believe maybe you don't believe a r s k junior let alone trump will actually survive ahead of the 20th of january next year? well, uh, well 1st i wasn't familiar with that. um, with that quote, uh that's interesting. i'll have to check that, i think it was to be the all about the health care reforms that clinton was going to make. and he said he expected he expected any president to be found, having sex with children in the cemetery basically because the whole media everyone would be against any president because of the powerful interest and big pharma that you've written about to actually, um yeah, uh, i mean no, i'll have to look of course the dog was um, you know, at, since he like,

he liked to sensational quote. so i, i, that's one of those things. i definitely need to check for myself. but did you ask, did you just ask me why? i believe the president in our to junior will survive till january 20th. well, obviously that would be an assassination attempt. and you can see already the, the reaction of the liberal media or is it what will least will they actually survive? i mean, how, how dangerous is right now for that me. do you mean physically survive? you're literally, i think, i think, i, yeah, i think i probably do actually, i mean, how powerful are big pharma and big agriculture. what i mean, what do they tried to do to you for the lead? respectfully, i think it's quite inappropriate for journalists to speculate about the murder of a president elect or an ally or colleague of here's in advance of a peaceful transfer power. i think it's, you know, i believe in florida,

i know it's, i'm not speculating and trying to encourage you. i'm saying to illustrate how powerful these interest, uh, and what the stakes are. and allowing people to democratically transfer about and to actually do the kinds of changes that have been spoken about of a big pharma, for instance. i mean, i think that it becomes more dangerous when, when the press raises by what possibilities i, i just really strongly encourage you to, you know, rephrase that because i, i don't really want to be, you know, part of the conversation, of course, but i mean, well threads, for instance, i mean, let's just go back to your, but like, how do you know if there's a certain time, i mean, you know, like how do you know any elected officials or by and how do you know any head of state will survive? these are um, quite a decent place. threatening things to speculate how high of the day,

how high are the stakes. i mean, i've heard you say that even the, even the election means they will have to attenuate any reaction to uh, uh, how they tackle both the big agriculture and big farm are the same time. and maybe they should do this one more slowly than the other. such are the powerful intelligent messaging purpose. that was the advice i gave for success. and i gave it in public for successful messaging purposes. that if you take on too much at once, and i gave similar advice, which i can't disclose doing an empty a. but, you know, every campaign i've ever advised, i recommended that they take things off to magically, you know, take due a week or 2 weeks on agriculture due a week or 2 weeks on farm. i do a week or 2 weeks on literacy and reforming, you know, the school system do a week or 2 weeks on making the iris a leaner and more accountable. it's just about good messaging because if you tackle

everything at once and make a lot of scatter shot, very exciting announcements. and then we have a situation in which you and i talking about what's going on are not presented with an obvious theme that we have to, which we have to respond were presented with a great deal of information. which makes it harder for journalists to cover any one specific themes. so that was my advice about that. it wasn't about to be careful. you know, physically, i mean, at every, every president and every tablet member who takes on powerful interest knows that powerful interest will try to protect their, you know, resources but, but i, i really want to move this conversation to a conversation about the peaceful transfer of power and, and,

and getting things done in policy terms rather than life or death terms. i, you know, again, i think it's so appropriate to raise that possibility. so the finds that papers, for instance, what will we hear as to how they, i mean, i don't know whether our of k juniors read your book, whether they will use the information in that to get some sort of a closure maybe is to at least talk about closure for the use of lives as regards the pandemic or i really don't know. my dad was a writer and he said that you know, your responsibility or your kind of a task with every non fiction book. it will fiction to you for that matter. i only write non fiction ends with the final word. it's up to the readers to, you know, make what they will of any book you write. so this is

a really important book. we've put it out. we've published it, which is itself a miracle given the wall of censorship around us, or the try to silence this book. 3 different governments tried to silence this book . there was just a judgment in britain, mark stein, who gave me a platform to bring some of the harms in these reports. before this book was published to a british audience and global audience through g b news, he's just been fined 50000 pounds or tasked with paying that amount for legal fees when he sought to defend his reputation of his career. and i went there also to support him in court against off. com, their media watchdog agency and britain suppressing the information. i'm not saying it was not true, but saying that it was harmful to reveal the truth about it. and so i hope of course, you know, our volunteers, these 3250 doctors and scientists who have who could have mobilized under our

leadership mine and my colleague danny kelly's to read through the 450000 internal pfizer documents released under a court order the have to ask the court to keep them hidden for 75 years. the court said no. these volunteers have testified and brought these findings to twice to the australian parliament. and they brought them to the brazilian parliament, which reacted by taking mandates off the table for children with these injections because they're so dangerous and damaging. and they brought them into british parliamentary and they brought them to senators, a sitting in our own congress. so i certainly hope that you know this, this book and its findings which documents the greatest crime against humanity in recorded history will be, will continue to be used. i think it's a factor in the big judgments you're seeing. i don't have

a direct knowledge of that, but you know, what's in the price of papers is now public. it's a map, it's, you know, it's in, you know, medical libraries. it's in my local library and book brooklyn, this book. so you're seeing now since the book came out, multi $1000000.00 judgements in favor of people who were coerced into getting this dangerous knowingly dangerous injection, knowingly sterilizing deadly. in some cases, injection. and you're also seeing multi $1000000.00 step settlements for people who lost their jobs when they refused to comply. so, you know, obviously i hope it as it continues to have a life in, in litigation and in justice for the victims. and it's a matter of public record beyond that, i really don't know what will happen. yeah, i mean, this show knows all about off going. they have the latest reports out today. there's the british dentistry of agency where in device we don't have to worry about that here. but i suppose when this interview perhaps goes on social media, we'll still have a slight worry in covering issues of the size of papers because we put it up on google's youtube ahead of this election. yeah, exactly where you could tell me

a bit about that. but i had of the trump integration, i mean at least do we look forward to the end of that kind of censorship? industrial complex, i meant how you'd be was on the show, the other day talking about the twitter files, the working with the, you know, most of the data. i mean what, what's gonna happen to us. i can go through and up. i have google, what do you expect? not just related to your work but to, to freedom of speech. yeah, well that's a great question. i'm happy that you asked it. it's so ironic, right? i come from the left as you mentioned to me in your introduction, i'm a, i've been a lifelong democrat and then i walked away and finally endorsed president trump. you know, in lions starkey junior and in advance of the election and encouraged liberals and independents to vote for them. and it's so ironic because the massive groundswell

of response, including from the legacy media of my former employer, is the guardian who fears that the trump euro trump r, as kate euro will be, a fishes stick a time of fascism. and of course, the suppression of free speech is part of the fascist tool kit. i've been writing about that since my book, the end of america, which came out in 2008. but paradoxically, the people who censored me and met. so you'd be in michael shaunberger and you know, professor jay, about a chart of stanford who was making very important points about how locked down. so we're going to drive millions of children into starvation, which they did. professor martin cooled to our for harvard. any number of serious people, the people who centered us, who were fishes stick about freedom of speech. we're with people. i voted for the bite administration, censored me in june of 2021. when i correctly warned women around the world, but especially in the west that women were reporting menstrual disc disorder,

serious mental disorders. upon receiving december, any injection that was correct. and the price of papers abundantly documents of $360.00 degree more on human reproduction, which has resulted now in 2024 and a 13 to 20 percent drop in live birds. amelion missing babies in western europe, a her wrist stick in in their charts and pfizer documents of her wrist. they damage that phase or knew they were causing to be the fertility in the man sees of women. the poisoning of breastmilk, the locking of ovaries with lifted mantle particles, the compromise of percent is leading to what is now 40 percent rise in life. birth an over 80 percent, miscarriage rate, and one section of the appraiser documents. 2 babies dying in utero in the pregnancy, my tech support advisors said was due to maternal exposure that vaccine just went to the white house. and then dr. will. and he told the women of america,

there was no bad time to get an injection before your baby was born during your pregnancy or after your baby was born. and so it's, it's even a massive crime. but the people who set up an office of this information and use the stalling is pointed to which doesn't exist in a 1st amendment. society missed information and put pressure according to, to attorneys generals lawsuits that you know, have, have it. it resulted in a disclosure of these emails by the white house. it was the white house pressuring tech companies to censor me. he paid my accurate quote, warning women about real damage, which really happened that was the white house that was the bite in white house. so i see that paradoxically, the trump era is likely to be one of aggressive defense is for freedom of speech. i don't know, we would just kind of do a break, but i'll stop you. the law from the co editor defies the papers. phases, crimes against humanity,

often this break the hello and welcome defrost of full works. here we discussed some wielding the during world war 2, the germans with the help of the ship. the creation revolutionary movement that the independent state of croatia, transport, $850.00, was in the way to work in force labor camps. the germans wanted the work force to be of the roads and the infrastructure in norway. so when they couldn't get enough prisoners from serbia, they contacted through social and the install of these camps to you had the death rate up to 82 percent each which is actually higher done in the old sweets among the wood, dozens of children moist did the george a boy, but not the video logo,

not to codes that is a registered yet. are the owners cool? that'd be good to. this is a goodness. interesting good enough for them. they had the horrible conditions except from the t lease. many people died from surveys, hunger as diseases, very few made it back home was to some of which of the, the magic drove and nickel, 9 mosier, but at yale and that plus the us. and this is what i mean. and then they go over all the the welcome back to going underground. i'm still here with the co editor of the size of papers professor, naomi wolf. so what exactly was the rationale behind publishes no refusing to publish it. and so, and, and for instance, there's english and british censorship, a complex saying we have to find anyone who talks about revelations in what is

behind all of these. uh, okay, so 1st of all, no one refused to publish the pfizer papers in united states. we had a lovely offer from sky horse publishing, which is a division of assignment schuster, and you can find the price of papers in any local library. you can walk into barnes and noble. you can order from amazon. no one refused to publish it because it is completely accurate. the 2nd thing is the judgment against mark stein and even the court cases which i peered about. the outcomes action against mark stein's show and acknowledge the judge. acknowledge that it wasn't stating that anything we said was in accurate, it wasn't stating that anything i presented was not true. it was saying that even if it was true, it was harmful to disclose the truth because it could upset people that was there

legal reasoning and you could go to my subject outspoken or get the judgement. it's a matter of public record. and, you know, in the royal courts of justice, so please don't mis characterize. no one has said anything in this book is not true . there's been no resistance to publishing it in the united states around the world . we're getting inquiries from germany and the netherlands, the netherlands has asked a demand to that bill gates as come to court to answer charges. the, you know, after i came with the findings of the visor, papers to the netherlands and you know it's, it's simply not accurate that there's been any the discipline, any statement of a thing in this book is not correct. the censorship that we do get us from outlets like youtube and certainly all the british media and certainly all of the legacy media because they don't want to cover it. they don't wanna cover it because the colluded in taking the money to misinform people and suppress warnings about the

dangers of these injections. pardon me? and that's not, that's a legal exposure for those news outlets and a house in the house. you may be brought to justice under a trump, to because community, the bible harris administrators included just as much as all these censorship uh high tech companies as well. the whole of western europe, i suppose, is just a, you're just gonna have to say that to one side. they're not going to go the same way, arguably as, what's going to happen in the united states. now, how does it go about it? you need to buy that, excuse me. i don't know what you mean by that, because people who learn the truth about what's in the price of documents all over western europe are very upset and they are wanting their speech rights back and they want their represent to you. there is no, i'm just making the repositories where there is a freedom of speech in western europe. you know, rumble is banned outright. and in france a whole, uh, whole context of war is currently being forward. i'm not able to be broadcast about

in britain. so that's why i'm exploring west in europe for now how, but at least the united states as a 1st amendment, and clearly the platform to jump right on was again, sense as you. so how does he begin to bring these people to justice as well? i just, you know, i'm not in any advisory role with the trump campaigns. yeah. i'm not in a position to, to, to, to tell you except as a citizen, but as a citizen, there are many ways to bring these people to justice all around the world, including in western europe, in the middle east, and israel and australia and africa. so 1st of all, be violated international law, because the nuremberg code calls for every you can't do medical experiments on humans without their informed consent. it's, it's completely legal. and that's what pfizer and madana and astrazeneca, the, we don't have materials now. she's going to cause papers, and yet that's what these companies in league with governments around the world

did. they violated people. they violated international law by withholding informed consent from people and engaging a massive medical experiment on them. but there are other ways to bring them to justice. we have to lawsuits civil lee. they are, they're liable, right? civilly, if you can sue the fda, you can see the white house, and you can see private corporations. and so there, that's the nature of many of the lawsuits that are under way. right now. we've advised one team of criminal attorneys and they're going after. i believe we go crimes and trafficking, or to bleeds trafficking, the bodies of people who are forced to receive the injection. certainly there's fraud involved, you know, one of the criminal offenses. the trees general helped us have looked at is false advertising. which state by state, by state is a criminal offense. a fraud is a criminal offense. they, they engaged in fraud by not telling people the truth about what was in the

injections by say, oh, you might have, you know, pain at the injection site or a fever or fatigue. well, pfizer knew the, you know, tens of thousands of, you know, for $42000.00 less serious adverse events in just 3 months, including $1225.00 deaths. and it was a fatigue and shells and painted the injection site, its strokes and dimensions, and alzheimer's and parkinson's and a turbo cancers and blood clots and lun clots, and lake lots and to embodied throughout the site. a p, a and skim disorders of all kinds. kidney damage, liver, damage into her risk menstrual and red, productive damage that i described. they knew all of this, you know, catastrophic neurological harms. and now we know the mechanism, right? the price of papers shows people how they were injured. and it's very important because it begins to lay down the basis of a science for real healing, which people are not going to get from their doctors,

because the doctors took the money and complied. and professional, you know, medical organizations took the money and complied. so those are multiple ways in the united states. you can bring people to justice in britain, there been some law suits by the vaccine insured they've been successful. and something that um that are teaching or has been talking about is in doing advertising, a direct consumer advertising of pharmaceutical companies to, to people. and that's going to change the landscape tremendously. because right now the, you know, television shows use, don't cover the damage from any pharmaceutical products because there's so much money. their primary advertisers, at least in television, are pharmaceutical ads. but when that becomes, we're one of 2 countries, the world that allows that needs to human being the other one. so when, if that becomes unlawful, there's going to be a lot more coverage of the harms metal support. people who bring civil and criminal

charges. so those are just some examples, but, you know, europe, i don't, i don't think you're going to be silenced forever. i think people are gonna read the dutch and the german versions of actually if the pfizer papers that are available, you can order them in the u. k. from amazon dot u k. and then you're going to see litigation. you're going to see people being perhaps injustice and other booksellers. i bet so much you've written about over the decades. i uh, you know, i would love to ask you about the gods of genocide. but um, immigration, in the short time we have left, you written about how it leads to use immigration. so a bit about the use of most of the use of immigrant labor from us in raise in the past. how. how important is it from a left perspective uh, to talk about the trump agenda in terms of the fact that immigration is used by

populates a note for good reasons, not for anything good. so i'm not sure i understand your question. i apologize. you've written about immigrants use has most maurice full of the military industrial complex in the united states. but how does that fit in with the a trump, i mean, you can hear it all on the so called liberal media or in the united states that immigration, this is just race as the policies of the trump administration. but actually, there are more complex mechanisms of play when it comes to immigration in the united states. and tell me why there is a good reason to look at immigration in the united states. and that boy will, just as trump says that he with i see what you're asking. well, just to be clear, i didn't state that illegal immigrants were being used as mercenaries. i was concerned that there's my own in reporting on my subject outspoken found. and it's

on the white house, you know, website that there's a, a 3 countries staging area where the state department, us department of alliance with united nations is bringing in these millions of people. they run a great united states, sorry, legal legal, no illegal as they are illegally in the united states. in other words, the state department and you in, in these 3 countries where they're being processed are colluding to bring them into united states legally. which to my knowledge has never happened before that the state department has engaged, you know, with the un in breaking sovereign nations laws in that comprehensive way. but you must know that, you know, 19 to 30000000 people are in the united states. you legally, they are not legal immigrants, they have walked right in and not gone through the process, which is

a lengthy one that my grandparents went through, for instance, and my dad to become legal immigrants, citizens of the united states. they are illegally here. so my concern was a lot of these people who been brought in illegally are from countries that produced mercenaries around the world. and i was also concerned that a lot of them are military age. and you know, it's just dangerous to have a lot of people who, you know, as we see as, as i predicted, the, you know, it turns out that it's cartels who are taking over and terrifying the residents of housing complexes in colorado. and now in 3 other states, but it's dangerous to have military age, men who are here illegally, who can, you know, communicate to do bad things like take over, you know, housing complexes that is a national security risk in anyone would say so, you know, if 30000000 people walked in to do by, you know, they,

the stories would be alarms to say the least. they wouldn't let it happen. you can't just, you know, walk into most saw for nations exception, western europe in north america now present and we will thank you. you're welcome. that's it for the show. i continued condolences to those of iving, the u. k. u s. u, i'm tall, the coolest here in this region will be back with a brand new episode on sat there until then. keep in touch by the social media. if it's not sense in your country and have to add channel going on, the run tv on romwell dot com to watch new and old episodes of going undergrads. these have the, the, [000:00:00;00]

the, [000:00:00;00] the scenes, the beginning of it says the read, the united states of america has officially declared this driving for freedom and people's rights to happiness. however, in reality, having won independence, american colonists headed for the total extermination of the indigenous population

of the continent, american indians were deprived of their land. local residents were driven into reservations and given the worst agricultural territories. while the best land was appropriated by white colonizers, the strongest blow to american indian tribes was the extermination of vice. the native americans lived by hunting these wild animals. colonists slaughtered the bivens, and in fact, made them nearly extinct. every buffalo did, he's in india and gone, said colonel richard dogs, a veteran of the bloody and vicious indian wars cynically. the indigenous population was simply exterminated us army generals philip sheridan express the evidence of this policy in the info his words. the only good india is a dead indian, the genocide of native americans of north america lead to a demographic catastrophe. the exact number of deaths is still unknown,

but the number of victims is in millions. having been a majority on the continent before the indigenous people make up less than 3 percent of the us population today. the good