the the, the side of the attack him was used for busily last night in the bronze region is of course a signal that they want escalation. and without the americans, it is impossible to use these high tech police files. multiple is tall, but definitely not one that american attack them stripe chain. vasa is saying with the file size as an open, i've salvo to 6 of 5 from ukraine with 5 open down rush are officially reboot. it's flat. don't try it. now with most of the award satellites come on to a lot to get attacked from any stay till minute to build new shut up notes, it resolves the right size box and $5000000.00. don is the rewards being offered by itself. prime minister,

anyone to garza safety with tons of hostage from up to the low from most of myself, the whole team here. our h q of are welcome to the program. it is but to have you with us. well, kicking us off with some breaking news. russia now defenses have reportedly intercept through the massive barrels of missiles and drones supplied from ukraine . videos of explosions have a large online the the attack is believed to have been focused on the western regions of po. good. i'm for rolling is relatively near the pool, which is crazy. as you can see, at least one building was damaged. the gulf and elves of runners, problems like cubes. full says what liberally targeting civilian areas was

previously ukraine's on forces used a tompkins missiles and the nerve and ice type on bushes. brown's region, according to the ministry of defense white here in moscow, and it's reported the 5 of the 6 miss. saws. what down while one was damaged and it comes around 24 hours often use broke. the us had officially signed off on the kids using those very missiles on russian soil and move the kremlin has slammed as dangerously raising the stakes. good. yeah, my goes and that's how can i know if what the new york times printed is true or an attempt to, to have the reaction. i don't know. the fact that the attack comes was used for busily last night in the bronze region is of course a signal that they want escalation and with all the americans. it is impossible to use these high tech me styles, but it has spoken about this many times. he warned about how our position would

change if the range of they are now discussing up to 300 kilometers has been approved. but in fact, this is not approval for ukraine to use long range. me styles is a simply announcement that we will now strike at up to 300 kilometers. also spacing out the g 20 summit in rio de janeiro, the tucker's president, against the backdrop, movies development side, one expressed support for rushes right to self defense. this in russia must have and still has the opportunity to defend itself and take measures to protect itself. and it had to take these measures just as we, the nato countries must defend ourselves and take steps to do so. i've seen us takes yet another step towards escalation by reportedly giving here the green light to launch long range strikes on boston soil. moscow has confirmed that it's updated, it's neat, cannot talk the trend, and now says the russia resolves the right to strike back. is it towards allied by

the us comes on the attack. know, just from new to the arms, but conventional weapons to all to use during the course of expense. essentially, moscow was saying that it considers key f and it's western sponsors to be collectively responsible for ukrainian strikes on russian territory that are using western supplied long range weapons. and if russia considers its sovereignty to be critically threatens, that's something that it could respond to using nuclear weapons against both ukraine and nato countries. but it's important understand that these changes to rush as nuclear doctrine do not actually change the fact that the, that the doctrine considers nuclear weapons to be primarily a deterrent force. missed something that rushes for administer. also said recently at a press conference, we come to the ends that the nuclear weapons use 1st and foremost a weapon to come straight in any prevents to prevent

any, any new clue when the ukrainian, the war against russia. by the wes started is quite a number of politicians in the west war, assuming that there might be in euclid elements. and this one, we never stuff of this conversation and the updates over they meet the 3 adults 3 and does not the interesting we should do whist wouldn't know. now it's also one doesn't important understand that he was a top diplomat. seems to be living in some sort of alternative reality because he himself is down playing the threat of nuclear war that we're looking at right now. just because the fight and administration is decision apparently only concerns conventional weapons. they don't see the relationship between the decision. thank you, my budget and by then and i was actually gone example,

i said that they just eat responsibility to thought to use the threat of nuclear weapons. what, but i didn't buy that. it's has also rise is to use inside the russian territory on deal distance or $300.00. it's going to meet this under russian border, which is quite limited by the way the use of that convention on our end. it seems that today the russian report that, that these of so these ations has been use and the 1st the 1st, the consequences of this, the american decision has taken place a fight. it is not the 1st time that some member stage authorized to use or the we punch in, you know, the to the using side to a restaurant directory. well, clearly, burrell doesn't understand that us attack comes missiles, can be armed, either with conventional more heads, or they can be armed with nuclear warheads. and this is something that russia is

not going to be able to just tell the difference about on top of that, these missiles are being launched with direct help from nato specialists and certain modified versions of these weapons can actually reach beyond 300 kilometer radius. actually, theoretically, reaching all the way up until mosse scale. and this is something that russian for president vladimir putin has talked about before. and when he said that, when it comes to state of the art missiles right, being launched from ukraine hitting targets in russia, they're gonna hit their targets in a matter of minutes. and the military, there is not going to sit around and try to figure out what's heading its way. this is another reason why ma scott was saying right now, trying to warn the west that the states right now are higher than they ever had been before. russia's new nuclear doctrine means needle missiles, fired against our country, could be deemed and attacked by the block on russia. russia could retaliate with w. m. d 's against key of and key natal facilities wherever they're located. that

means world war 3. i mean, i think most goes painful and stop very clear about what it feels that we will have to respond when escalation comes and yet west, the nation seemed to be consistent in disregard taking one of these warning. so you have to off, do they think that most? cuz blah say, well, it really looks that way because in terms of the actual official statements we've seen come on reaction to russia's new nuclear doctrine. they've done nothing other than just blamed russia for everything and anything connected to the ukraine conflict. and just simply ignore the provocative nature of findings decision which basically gave rise to all this in the 1st place. putting disputes vladimir putin. this tween with our fears, mama, we have no illusions pollutants. russia will remain one of the most serious security threats, not only to europe, but also to the global order to this error responsible rhetoric coming from russia

. um and that is don't go to the, to our support for you price virus washington. what is the us say? well, i mean, it looks like they're just trying to downplay the seriousness of this situation. just trying to cover their ears closed their eyes. this can of worms that they open because we've heard a number of statements. the pentagon is saying process not going to launch any nuclear missiles and washington is saying that, you know, there's no need to even change the u. s. nuclear doctrine. and unfortunately not surprised by the comments the criminal is made around the publication of this new revised nuclear doctrine. despite what russia says, neither the united states nor nato pose any threat to russia. so we have not seen any reason to adjust our own nuclear posture. we're not at war with russia and the party here that continues to escalate that. this war is russia. we aren't surprised by rushers update to it's nuclear,

dr. and it's something that they've been signaling that they intend to update to over the last several weeks. it's the same, you're responsible rhetoric that we've seen before. we don't have any indications that russia is preparing to use a nuclear weapon within ukraine. and while the us continues to just brush off uh la scales warnings from across the atlantic, among the nato countries that are closer to the ukraine conflict like sweden, norway, finland. we're actually seeing them start to instruct their own citizens on how to prepare for war. so it's really a startling situation. we can only really help hope that level of heads prevail. well, joining me now to meet you probably on a rush deputy. i'm boss to the, to the u. n. a. well, welcome to the program. so thanks very much for your time. on the 1st question i have few rushes defense ministry like for took spot during the program has reported . the ukraine's military has used a task, comes missiles to strike the bronze range and have you had

a chance to discuss this at the un. and is there any time to convince an emergency meeting about you know, we didn't, we didn't have a chance to discuss it. so with anybody of the, there are people asking us in the cool are so for what to follow and uh what are, what are assessments of distribution? look, i think we lead the position very clear and there during the last couple of weeks and there are no illusions that such here, such a move from green and from it. so the western sponsors is a deliberate escalation. i think there is absolutely no doubt about it. so there are people in moscow were responsible for accounts. iranians responding to these types of threats and effects and these people are not so deep limits. i think that it's, it's their turn to say their words. i mean, the ukranian no far as he is have been very open in saying, but yes,

we got official permission to use the top comes most solve destroyed russian territory. but that on the other hand, washington, it still has a public p, confirm that. so i just wanted to get your opinion, why is it, do you think the us is so hesitant to admit the slightest move? i think the us wants to put into the shadow the reality. the fact that if such kinds of weapons is being used, it means that it is being used with the help of mates. so because it's not possible for you, great and alone, to determine the targets to launch these. so these new style is common knowledge and it was repeatedly acknowledged by ukrainians on the west and the visuals themselves. it means that the there is a strike. it's not only ukrainian strikes, it's a strike of certainly to country who is behind it, the united states. and in the case of ethic guns, what i want to say now shifted to you. what specifically, i know that yesterday russia veto the resolution that was put forward by posting

you pay on the sierra leone on the conflict in dawn. um, what do you think london free town go wrong and that vision of how that devastates and conflict should be results. but i think the phone appears among the authors of the resolution and the last moment. so we can say that this is a nearly uh british draft. uh it has a very. busy ads uh i would say meaning for saddam because it totally disregards. and this respects the soup sylvania. so down a far as is and it's uh if adoptive difficult to have 3 guards more escalation if what kind of poor of the guys are limited to it until they fire. uh, that's why we explained it extensively in our explanation of the roads. uh, that's why we have absolutely no other choice but to prevents, but they said dangerous scenario from type. i mean, yes,

i do and scarce counsels. i did discuss the mid least. we're getting reports now, but lebanon, and has, but i have a reportedly agreed to a us, let's see, for, on some media reports also say independence, really official, recently visited vasa in secret to seek assistance for negotiations between the idea of and has. but i, my question is, is it possible to reach a resolution in lap and then if negotiations for golf at school or other to tow to me and connected i think they are interconnected. and just so being assisting in the security council close consultation, some level, no, not really seems to be reports around junkie or lacroix and from other officials on the ground. and they acquired pessimistic the us. we presented you by the way, it didn't push the cause for the minutes. there's that lucian on the ceasefire. i'm

agreement of the ceasefire. and we will remember in case of guys a that's of these kinds of mediation ends up in this situation. we're on the 0, tries to modify the agreements in the way he sees them and that prevents the parties to come to an agreement on the united states is doing absolutely nothing to coal ease at all to order. so i wish i were mistaken, but i am afraid that's the same faith. will they wage any possible uh, agreements uh on the on level on what's happening to a different conflict. ukraine that was also raised and discussed at the, at the security council yesterday. i want to briefly listen to the small sound bite from the bridges, 4 and 6th street david long and then i'll come back from just to put down. let me be crystal clear. that is no equivalence, no comparison, no power though,

between those reckless states who support russia's illegal aggression and those who stand with ukraine in defense of itself into a general questions you. so how would you respond to that? well, apparently mister lenny lost his nerve yesterday at the meeting because of our negative votes on the thrusters additional so them because it was expected to be presented as a successful. she's visits in new york and she was very visibly disappointed. but uh, when the west and officials are promoting the narrative like these, they are of course, ignoring the fact that there is history before february, 2022 that we came to ukraine to stop the war, which was already ongoing for several years. and where people were dying and when these 3 months were absolutely undermined by you. great. now these sponsors. so i think that when she's trying to attack us in these, regardless, he is, in fact uh,

discovering his own uh, his own role there all of his own country and its allies in standing up the crisis in ukraine and interning ukraine and so into it onto russia into a place where the threats come to russia, emailed and late. and so that's the situation that we uh wants to rectify and we will do everything we need to achieve this go about same meeting. we'll also be seated here from the us. and boy, again, i want to uh, show us a snippet and then we'll return no country, quote unquote, security concerns, legitimate or otherwise, give it to the right to dictate another country's policies, let alone invade an annex. another country's territory. one would always be forgiven for thinking that that was an unexpected moment of self reflection. mister

polanski, who do you think the us on board was talking about uh, i think that's logically, she would have been talking about the wrong country. because a while it does have to count of how many occasions there were in the previous history when united states invaded southern states installed a government's method like made the leasing change thinking political leaders. but as the, as i said, minutes ago now of the some of this l r i sent to you keep in particular, i'm trying to claim that there was absolutely no history and before february 2022 and they are approaching you to use absolutely clean mind pretending that everything was i was going to do for them to wait uh before the special meals reparation started. but this is, of course, i'd be pathetic. i'm long convincing for anybody for cuz you know, at least that brute the primitive knowledge of, of history. i mean,

a 1000 days have passed since the conflict in ukraine abrupt as an during this period, a number of countries i'm talking specifically china preserve the african union to they've also to help results the crisis by negotiations. and those negotiations, they say, must be based on mutual respect, that has to be the starting point. why is that still no progress? when it comes to settling the conflict? i suppose, why is the west still insisting on resorting to unilateral to months? i think that the west is, is at a loss what to do right now because they are project defend tiasha. uh you agree is uh is losing, its quite clear is losing the lights. i really, whatever west is trying to do to support its, its losing and is objective reality and they don't know what to do right now. that's why they try it to uh,

to reformulate their aims. if at 1st it was defeating a russia, inflicting strategic defeats on the rush. i'm now it's great and favorable. negotiate of conditions for ukraine. and they of course, now try to print times. that's ukrainian these formulas we're trying fact, a ultimatums, a reasonable ultimatum. so to russia are the only basis for these, but we see is you're rightly pointed out that there are more and more countries that are seeking alternative ways to bring an ends to a new cranium crisis. and we welcome such meaningful efforts. but we always notes in this regard, that's in order to, to stop this crisis and to find the permanent and sustainable solution while needs to, uh, to eradicate. so the root cause is of the grading of conflicts. and this is a very important part of any effort, so that would be them. and you mentioned also um my the 1000 base from the start of

the conflicts yesterday or the security council needs meeting. we told mr. lenny but he forgot to baltimore enforcement dates and this is 950. these says that he's at the, he's for this as a boy is drunk, something to you when he actually prevented restaurant through grading, to find the from finding a solution of these crisis, which is already initials and on the table. you convinced it, ask you that he should fight, and this was a fatal and terrible mistake. why is it ask you so only a few days after the beginning of the, the phase of your brain, your price is there was a chance for peace. and of course, ukraine would have been absolutely another shape to the if you bring and leads that are wouldn't have listened to, wouldn't have listened to the my lai. and that's wise for mr. johnson. i'm fine. if i may, i know i know that your very busy mind that the russian foreign ministry has

provided to the international court of justice and evidence of cubes forces committing atrocities in the dumbass region. and this of course, triggers the question why do international organizations have to be directly handed search information instead of them on their own initiatives, reaching out foster to write such blatant wrongs. it is because of the blazing double standards. they absolutely wants to ignore any proofs any, any testimony is the pressures providing them. they claim that the rest is not the right. uh, as you know, that any, any news media from russia he's continued. he's going to see that to be russian for up against the labels like this and disregard it's in the, in the west at least there are attempts to disregard that with media. so that's the same tactics about, i think that's what will be persistence, you know, efforts to,

uh, to ensure accountability for those who are committed crimes and these conflict. and there are a lot of crimes of, of the military formations and that nationally. but that is of your brain and law as you write besides, we provided a concrete data about these crimes of all these facts that to the relevance international institution. well, we appreciate you taking the time out of your day to spit to us that was to me a tree by the honest a rushes deputy on bus, the, to the you on thanks very much. have a wonderful day. you get to the $5000000.00 and that's how much money as well is ready to pay. anyone from garza safety were tons of hostage from hamas cup to the t. benjamin s. no. who made that statement while visiting a will. so on tuesday, we looked at whoever brings us a hostage will find a safe path for he and his family to get out, we will give

a reward of $5000000.00 for each hostage choose the choice is yours, but the result will be the same. will get the old back and 12 visits in guy's arms, natania who claims that israel is doing everything possible to bring home the hostages. both the living and the dad, he even addressed the captors directly warning that israel will pursue and get anyone who harms the optic to use. and once again, because we heard about that before, he offered as 5000000 dollar rewards to anyone in gaza, who helps return the captives with promises of safe passage for those who call parade in the same patients and yahoo double down vowing the time us would never rule as treat any more and move that could be seen as a tactic to pressure the militant group and push those, holding the hostages to take a deal before it's too late. let's take a listen. i'm us. mazda is not real garza, we are depleting its military capabilities in a very impressive way. we are moving towards its administrative cool. so that how

mosse will not be in gaza. we will not give up on this mission. well, nathan, yeah, who has been posting the hostages from can send 30 his speech his we some 3, but critics say it's just a way to deflect blame on monday. he holes, he told the connected these really parliament, but after it's to release the captive, haven't stopped for a moment speaking directly to the families sitting in the gallery at that time. yet behind the scenes, a slightly different picture is immersion is really media reports that netanyahu and nearly a point of defense minister vista cats recently rejected proposals from the road to go staging team, including the chief, all is really secret service massage to expend. israel's turns for deal negotiators, we pulled the warrant that without no flexibility, no agreement would be possible with them. yes was office has denied these claims, calling them biased leaks aimed at pressure. and e's real into agreeing to have

masses terms. but the public, especially the fact while these of the captives who have been taken to the streets of his regular cities, weekly to fence their frustration and anger, remained rather skeptical. let's state commission b b, b, b. prove that you are a leader. prove that you are worthy make a deal now until you do this, you will be remembered for all eternity as a person, not a leader who sacrifice the lives of hostages is rarely citizens and foreign citizens in exchange for your seat. i call on you need those of the world president by then and president elect trump done give up on the us to just to children their parents and 97 other us to is a waiting to be saved to be brought back home to the families and to my government, they say i'll be in favor of our future. and i cannot imagine what the future will

look like if we failed to bring them home with all kinds of to cat car. a key mediator stepped back from hosted steel and seize 5 talks and reportedly us senior mosque leaders to leave the country. and with negotiations that basically stalled many seen it and yeah, it was public remarks has an effort to save face and mean accusations that he's the one to railing progress. how will this affect the fate of the hostages while the clock is ticking? while we will have to wait and see the nigeria as president has spoken out against western assets to full energy sector reforms around the world. he described the mazda assistant in task, the only puts developing countries father into that his solution. what is the last ones to change and all the countries policy that it needs to foot the bill itself, or at comp $29.00 was set to establish a new climate finance go,

an upgrade to the 100 $1000000000.00 the developed nations had promised developing countries to help respond to climate change without debt relief injecting this capital will be like peddling hot or on a bicycle as it's times go flat. even most climate time comes in. the form of loans is based on what the architects of the parents agreement envisioned when they spoke of climate justice, africa needs relief, and the world needs africa. well, those comments called last global powers convened for the u. n. climate summit in azerbaijan, the debt of african nations, the west in finance, has, has become a top consign the african development bank group has estimated the continents total external that rose to $1.00 trillion dollars by the end of last year. we have some send me all the data from the fryeburg institute for basic income studies in germany. he said his me loans are a cos, shopping generations of africans in

a vicious psych. i would say that's not reasonable and you would find out that most of the aides that we came to give out, i mean the west teams to give out. he's actually in the form of doing so it's a pilot in the loan. it's someone in the ditch you from used to build the fishing out. i guess you would seem to pressing down for the answer to it. so it's not reasonable. i for i think that the west you can, you can see that he's and see that he's the one to handle clements outcomes then they also have to be and so if they're with at the group, i know it's once significant. and so since it was comes with respect to climate change, then those uh, this, once he's supposed to have to me, call me to made significant commitments to allow for 10 countries to be able to establish those outcomes. because we want to spend, because many of the resources that we need for such an easy actually is integral myself. and so, but we don't have the resources,

we don't have the technology. and so we need that skill of cherry new orleans africa. and so we need sleeping and below. so if we can just before we go pro weston pro testers in b. c, have held another demonstration against the concierge holding political party. georgia, dream one the elections last months and alongside office campaigning for an independent national police force. the opposition demonstrates this have previous remarks alongside senior officials from western states. they centrals. this government has to friendly to the neighboring brochure and a pushing energy elections results to be of a ton. this time the ronnie descended into violence classes broke out with me. well that doesn't equal level voltage in the format as us the signing of this i would like to sticking with us. we have the.