the, the, the cities there are no means of countering such weapons. today, the modern air defense systems available in the world. and the missile defense systems being built by the americans in europe do not intercept such messiah flooding or opposing confirmed with russia. use the brand new hypersonic mess so that the west cannot defend against, in order to strike in military industrial facility in ukraine. the bottom i put and says, washington's desire to maintain his own head, germany has driven the world up to the brink of a global complex and washington issues scaling condemnation of russia over the current escalation of the complex, but fails to answer questions about whether it was in fact, the us that started in into

rush of would escalate. the war would be a really good flight for television. so why now, why change the policy? i'm not going to get into specific brand operations. the you're watching artsy international. i'm rachel ruble live in moscow, but i'm are put in has confirmed russia used an experimental hypersonic missile to attack a military industrial site in new crime. the russian president specified the projectile was equipped with a non nuclear warhead. he said, the missile can travel at such a high speed that it can penetrate any western air defense that i used to see. friends, if i knew that i would like to inform the personnel of the armed forces of the

russian federation, citizens of our country, our friends around the world. and those who continue to harbour allusions about the possibility of inflicting a strategic defeat on russia about the events that are taking place today in the zone of the special military operation. namely, about the use of western manufactured long range weapons on our territory as they continue the escalation of the west and provoked the conflict in ukraine. the united states and its nato allies earlier announced that they were authorizing the use of their long range precision guided weapons systems on the territory of the russian federation. experts are well aware and the russian side has repeatedly emphasized. this is something that it is impossible to use such weapons without the direct involvement of military specialists from the countries producing such weapons, he moved on november, 19th, 6, operational technically, marseilles not tech m. s. produced by the us, the end on november 21st and the combined miss all attacks with the u. k. made

storm shadow and us made hi, my systems were launched against military facilities on russian territory in the brown skin course regions. since then, as we have repeatedly emphasize to the regional conflict and ukraine previously provoked by the west has taken on elements of a global character. our air defense system has repelled these effects. as a result, the goals that were obviously set by the enemy were not the chief to set a fire at the munition depot in the bronze region caused by folding debris from an attack m. s. miss file has been extinguished. there were no casualties or serious damage in the course. the region an attack was made on one of the command posts of our group north as a result of the attack and the anti aircraft bethel. there are unfortunately casualties, even if there are killed and wounded among the personnel. the externally security unit and service personnel combined an operational stuff of the control center has not suffered and casualties this and is normally directing the actions of our troops to destroy and expelled enemy units from the course region. once again,

i would like to emphasize that the use of such weapons by the enemy is not able to effect the course of combat operations in the zone of the special military operation. our troops are successfully advancing along the entire line of companies . all the tasks we have set for ourselves would it be accomplished in response to the use of us and british long range weapons on november 21st of this year, the russian armed forces launched to combine strike on one of ukraine's defense industry facilities. the combat conditions included a test of one of russia's newest, medium range missiles systems in this case sort of with a ballistic missile, with nuclear free hypersonic equipment to our me, sol, engineers named it. originally the test was successful. the goal of the launch was achieved and one of the largest industrial complexes known since the days of the soviet union, and which still produces missile equipment and other weapons today was hit in the city of the net profit task and ukraine. we are developing intermediates, range and short arrangements. i also as

a response to us plants to produce and deploy intermediate range and short range missiles in europe and asia. we believe that the us made a mistake by unilaterally withdrawing from the treaty on the elimination of medium range and short range missiles in 2019 under far fetched predicts, today the united states and not only produces such equipment. but as we can see in the course of measures to train its troops, it does have worked out the issues of transporting that advancements out of systems to different regions of the world, including europe and what is more, they are conducting training exercises on their use. let me remind you that russia has voluntarily, unilaterally committed itself not to deploy medium range in short range missiles until us weapons of this kind are deployed in any region of the world. i repeat, we are conducting life tests of the original missile system in response to the aggressive actions of need countries against russia. the question of further deployment of medium in short arrangements solves, would be decided by us,

depending on the actions of the united states and its satellites. we will determine the targets for further tests of our newest missile systems on the basis of threats to the security of the russian federation. we consider ourselves entitled to use our weapons against military facilities of those countries that allow their weapons to be used against our facility. and in the event of an escalation of aggressive actions, we will also respond decisively defending the mirror in like manner. i recommend that the ruling elite, so those countries that are planning to use the military contingent against russia seriously. consider this of course, so choosing if necessary, and those that retaliatory measure of targets to be hit by such systems as or actually on ukrainian territory. we will proactively notify civilians and also ask citizens are friendly states who are there to leave the danger zone. we will do this for humanitarian reasons. openly, you know, publicly without fear of opposition from the enemy. also receive this information. why without fear? because there are no means of countering such weapons. today, these missiles attacked targets at the speed of mach 10. that is 2 and

a half to 3 kilometers per 2nd. the world's current air defense systems. and the missile defense system of the americans in europe do not intercept such miss science. this is impossible. i emphasize once again, that it is not for russia, but the united states that have destroyed the international security system. and by continuing to fight and cling to their who gemini, they are pushing the entire world towards the global conflict. we have always preferred and are now ready to resolve all contentious issues by peaceful means. but we are also ready for any development. if anyone still doubts this, it is in vain. there will always be a response. i thought it was one of the pentagon kind of firms that russia did warn . the us about the hypersonic missile launched. also, the white house accused rush of escalating the conflict. but dodge questions about whether it was, in fact, the u. s. fed instigated it escalation at every turn at every step is coming from russia. they're the ones who escalated this. they're the ones who started this war

is because of their aggression into a summer territory. ukraine and this war can and today you hear say this over and over again. it can, if russia would stop the war and stop what they're doing with their aggression. so this is an aggression from their side. for a long time, the white house are using these long ridge type into russia to tie target and say russia would escalate, the war would be really been fight retaliation. so why now, why change the policy now? i'm not going to get into specifics. we're going to continue to be there for ukraine. this is a president that has led on making sure ukraine has what it needs on in the battlefield. all right, we can speak now to a former pentagon senior security policy analyst, michael move, who is here in the r t studio with me, michael, great to have you here in person with us. um. it's just laughable, isn't it?

um, if it weren't a funny and non funny situation, i should say with washington blaming moscow for this escalation when it was in fact the you was that instigated it by giving authorization for key of to conduct these long range missile strikes into russia. what are your thoughts? my thoughts are that that of the by the administration is it doesn't have a plan, does not have a strategic plan. it is a, it is a looking for ways to continue continually to put the burden on, on, on putting, and the end russia when it, when in fact it was us policy started in 2014 and, and did end up tomato expansion. that drove put in to, to do the special military operation. and that's a totally ignored by the west. and what they're doing now is just reacting to daily events all the time. this latest escalation was done as

a result of bite and allowing for these longer range missiles to go into russia itself into but restricted to the course squares. so they've, they've been going into the premier and, and zalinski has been using attack ups in the past. and, and crimea, so it is, i think, i think the escalation is, is more psychological even though the, the previous reason only because the west has to control the missiles. they're the ones who have the intelligence, they do the data entry and, and the maneuvering of the, of the messiah so. so there is natal participation and this is what's, uh, what, what is appears to be the escalade story aspect of this, although they've been using muscles for some time. yeah, michael, you really have a unique perspective and because you serve previously as a senior security policy analyst in the pentagon,

so help us to understand why the bonded administration made this decision to allow you have to use these long range missiles to, to hit russian because it, it had resisted up until the election and now that the administration was on the way out, the democrats have loss now of a sudden by the report of the gives the is relied. i think it's because of the loss . and the fact that this is just one more way, the democrats and getting back at the republicans and to trump it to basically lock him in on a policy that failed policy before he even takes office. this is basically an attempt by the democrats to set trump up for failure. and this is an outrage, this insidious. and it shows that the democrats shows a, a mean streak and, and, and it a poor loser attitude rather than trying to work together to resolve this problem

they're trying to intensify. and i think that this, i think trump may in turn say, stop me. hopefully put mr. put in, realizes at night he knows trump is going to be coming. i don't think he wants to limit trumps options. so i think he's going to continue intensifying attacks like with this latest my so on ukrainian targets and, and use much more sophisticated systems that, that would be incapable of being knocked out. and i, and i think that's probably the direction is going to go. and this was a mis file that was used today. that is nuclear capable. but it was using conventional nerved missiles, meaning that multiple warheads i saw, i saw one of the films on it today and it's devastating the they, they impact of this multiple forehead system. and it's, uh, there's no defense against it. now if he does that,

numerous times incentive and in swarm swan capability on military targets. i think, i think that the, let's see, is gonna have to re think what is so called strategy might be, because there is nothing that i've seen i was gonna say was to try to do it. and the white house doesn't have one. they're only reacting to events. yeah. so the question is, a, what's planned here? yeah. and there is none. and this, and this is, and you don't go to, you know, get into a serious conflict with another. very serious nuclear power is as russia is, without knowing what the heck you're doing, but that seems to be the direction the by, by the ministration is going. yeah, a put in the has clearly stated that russia will respond to any escalation against his country. why don't western powers take him seriously? because putting says a thing, and then he does the thing and everybody seems to be surprised by it. why? well, we take him to spend the history of, of the relationship between the united states and russia. they never took and

serious. they never took mr. brewton seriously. me back in december of 2021. when he says you are approaching my red line, don't do it. you are a threat to, with your nato expansion. your a threat to my, to, to, to the federation. also that the fact too that the that the, the original proclamation that brought you created the bean. it was supposed to be non aligned. no nato, no, no belonging to any military alliance, whether east or west and the fact that there was agreement to that or that the american people do not know the history of what led up to where we were. it is it that including the. busy couple and more so they, i think i'll go in and they, you can't tell a lot of people the west of, of course, because i've gotten the media and, and this is very sad. and this is what it needs to be more stated as to what was that bill to what let us to this point. and that's not being well orchestrated. and

certainly i, i think the, the, the west wants to get beyond that. they don't want to, they don't want to be exposed as to that is this was their doing an or on doing to to, to do this by this native expansion. in spite of half a dozen agreements that that were violated called that then established what they call into visibility. you don't arm the west at the expense of the east. warsaw pact went away in 1991, but nato stayed intact. and his back up until this time they were, they were looking for why, why are we still in existence? and now this has given them a whole new life. and this supports the military industrial companies. this is, this is good for their, for their pockets. and, and it supports their, their, their initiatives, and it gives, gives nato, now a whole new perspective. now they want to expand not only north to the arctic but, but also to the east and the japanese and the south preexisting. we don't need that

. so this is, this is very, very serious, and it's got to be nipped in the bud. and that's why an american people themselves are not for, that's why they want to, that's why they basically voted this administration out and, and, and also voted against harris. mm hm. so confirms that russell used to this new hypersonic missile the rest next no rush like against the ukrainian military industrial facility, put in says i can travel mach 10 threats up to 3 kilometers per 2nd now, which is just, i kind of wrapped my brain around that 10 times the speed of sound, but yeah, a just what, what do you know about this technology? it's, it's a, they say it's experimental, but when you're actually using it now in combat, it's been tested, it's tested now it's, it's now operational and it, it, it, prove it, it's nuclear capable. but the re, but the point is that there was no nuclear weapons on it. it's merv, that means it has multiple warheads. and that's why it,

it could be devastating. and you could are also arm up with tactical nuclear if you wanted to. but, but the speed of it makes it, uh, it makes it um, and one rouble to any existing missile defense system today. all right, we're going to leave it there. mike on the list of former pentagon seat or security policy analysts. thank you for coming into the studio and speaking with us. thank you, richard. well, bladder, according to the russian president, the russian like, is a state of the art intermediate range, ballistic missile. it can travel at mach 10 that's up to 3 kilometers per seconds. mr. put in the emphasize the advanced hypersonic projectile can penetrate any defense or to senior correspondent randasia for parts labs. the biggest takeaway as this is the of russia now has the right to strike at the countries the manufacturer. the ne solved, because the specialists are involved in putting, for example, slide promises,

clyde pots into these miss alls and the service in them. the washer now has the right to strike a targets in these countries ways, which is why he said that this cold places now take it on the characteristics of a global company. like we have 2 minutes describing the id as new system, which is hypersonic, but least they can be solved with a range of thousands of kilometers that can travel a $2.00 to $3.00 kilometres. the 2nd, we know applies the me, solid seals that the united states and states spend almost 2 decades building nation pacific region in europe. and because of which it has a nation ruined relations with russia. the pop to enmity began for the united states. me, so she'll be, will remember speech in unit 2008,

which is where the chasm, the cracks to into a chasm. and this is russians response essentially what vladimir said because of your actions because you will not lift, it will restrict you on far. you will be solved as are assisting inquiry you will need to solve into russia. we have come out, we have developed and we have deployed tests that use this new me solve which you have knew who against essentially the stress that there is no system on the existence. the can intercept the afternoon. me, sol, traveling 2 to 3000 meters per 2nd and we saw dramatically for the population online. the various angles of that, that's me. so what should i say? it is me so striking over the eyes of the huge mush plugs in.

uh yeah, but it fits it all. it is one of the previous defense industrial facilities. one of the same was in ukraine. it's still, according to russian intelligence manufacturers, rocket parts. it's still manufacturers, munitions, it repairs, conduct repairs of ahmed vehicles. supply by the west abrams tides net protected strategy guides, as well as personal carriers from bradley's to mazda infantry advising vehicles supplied by the west to ukraine. he's destroyed damaged by rush on the front lines . they go back there for repairs. that was struck in a dramatic fashion. you could see that was miss housing, enticing like rays of life was a blue sky. and perhaps that was the point, a demonstration of strength, a demonstration. this isn't going to get any better that you are going to stop us and you've made yourselves more unsafe then you would before you unbox or they

stood. and there is, there is still of course, the question of why the, by the ministrations decide to lift these restrictions. especially given the most western weapons types me, solid types, russia has led to shoot jobs, evidently. what be sure, and brands you can cause age and a half z, he's the warehouse the i moved up in brands the falls, the fall. bowes would have been chosen for vendors that can be improved and said the, the me solves, were struck down, they didn't achieve the goal of destroying the storage. there was surface far as they would quickly push out. so it, it again goes to show the latter may approve who is and his administration, the russian government with the support of the people that might be added. but they are adamant that they are determined to continue the course of russia is on the

stress. again, the pressure was the result of things peacefully, but it takes to it takes the other side, also willing, being willing to negotiate the tool and to resolve these differences on the country . we have seen anything but russia and russia will respond to future threats to future escalations in a mirror with the bladder may approve and speeches such as this was generally a, a target audience. it may not be also the public, the masses, but i can tell you, but it depends on what the c i a and the white house they'll be sitting there, they'll be picking. so be picking this feature part. they're going to try to see what he meant, the, the games that like represent had and what, what the message, the takeaway for vet law for us, the public. but for them is out of it. again, read rep who can said that all lames, the special minutes, the operation,

the objective. this will be achieved. the side disease that some people have about the strategic the fees awaiting russia in the fields of you, craig. but this won't come to pass. and the pressure will continue on until the end of special military operation. vladimir put in the statement comes after the russian m o. d said it's air defense systems. down to u. k. produced storm a shuttle missiles that follows the reported approval by both washington and london for cube to use their long range weapons in strikes on russia. the criminal and says the west is adding fuel to the fire of the conflict. would you believe culture, a new escalation has occurred? this is an irresponsible position taken by the outgoing us administration. they are continuing to add fuel to the fire of the ukrainian conflict by preventing any possible dynamics for its resolution. while using ukraine as a to in the war against russia. let us fight the wes apparent approval for ukraine

hughes as long range missiles, just right russia, moscow's forces are making strides across the front lines. here's a map of comparing control of today's battlefield versus just a month ago, according to open source data from the institute for the study of war, russian troops have gained nearly 6 times more territory this year than last year. meanwhile, in the u. k, there was 50 criticism over the move to allow the storm shadow strikes me the id card is going to win. frankly, just for the beds. i the what was going on a lot of enough that the cottages, a massive we're doing, is helping to prolong a style. might the prime minister should make a statement to parliament immediately to confirm whether u. k. missiles had been fired into russia. he must tell the british public if this means we are now at war with a nuclear power, what risk this poses to people in britain and why this action was taken without any

approval from parliament? as british storm shuttle missile slammed into russia, the british government announces 500000000 pound of cuts in defense capabilities. not a good look. a former british parliament member, george galloway brought up the issue of cabs use of western long range missiles against russia. on his talk show. he successfully predicted that brought him or put in would oversee a military response. a man not fit to be present done again is none the less fit to take the world into nuclear or oblivion. of course, the democrats are allowing him to do it because its primary purpose is not to assist the crew. golf key of the me as the landscape. the primary purpose is to scuffle the incoming battleship called donald j. trump. they all determined to sink trump presidency before it begins just as they walk in

2016. then it was russia, russia, russia. it was the rush. i gave scandal this time it's bombing rush. now let me make this abundantly clear. the russian response will be swift and overwhelming. you don't have to take my word for that. you can listen to the man with his finger on the russian nuclear trigger. vladimir putin has as late as september made clear that any attack by long range myself supplied and indeed targeted and indeed operated by nature will be treated as the declaration of direct involvement in the war by the whole allies, the whole alliance, even though only the united states and the united kingdom have thus breached

hooton's red line. all of them are closing the embassies in cab. today, even those with the least to do with nato decision making, like the government in athens, for example, the nato alliance is thus jointly and separately responsible for a declaration of war, and the perpetration of acts of war. the. let's cross live now to john volero, director of policy and research at dd geo politics, who joins us from boulder, colorado, and we heard him or couldn't speak earlier, saying that russia will respond to any escalation against his country. it's certainly a red line that he's laid out many, many times before, but i'm wondering what you think about that statement that he made today. what kind of message is moscow sending to ukraine and it's western allies? and once again, president put and it continues to be cool, calm and collected,

and stressed, a measured in proportion and response. of course, he laid out the severity and seriousness of these latest attacks by ukraine using us long range missiles, which russia correctly considers a very attack by the united states and its allies themselves. and he said very explicitly that he understands that these weapons systems cannot be used without us military experts and other nato military experts. and these are very serious times . and for us as american citizens in particular, it is critical that we speak up in times like these to make sure that our government is held accountable. and that we don't continue to one waste the resources of the american people. and get us bogged down in a dangerous, dangerous war with global ramifications. yeah, and, and making this statement today, the russian presidents talked about this missile that's russia has that

is so fast it can penetrate any western defense system. i'm wondering, um for these western powers, i keep okay. in the bay are how prepared are they to actually face the consequences for their actions against russia? well, the western powers are still scrambling to really prepare to deal with what they've already bitten off in terms of provoking a war directly with russia. we saw germany release earlier this week. they are very artfully named operation plan germany, which is basically an attempt for germany as well as the other eastern european states to prepare logistically in the event of a war with russia. now this isn't something new. we know that europe, for a long time, has been preparing logistically, but they are behind. and what we understand is that

a lot of these european countries, whether we're looking at france, whether we're looking at germany or great britain, had been hesitant. and earlier this week, we saw them waffle on whether or not they were actually going to announce that they also were going to approve the use of their long range weapon systems against the sovereign territory of the russian federation. now of course we have heard news breaking on november 21st. that british storm shuttle mission missiles have indeed been used. so we are, we're entering very tenuous times for europe ended european nations. europe is facing a lot of the similar crises that we face here in the united states and even more directly, they are in the proximity of the russian federation. so they'll have to deal directly with the consequences of these actions and they're already feeling the effects of the sanctions. the west has imposed on russia as well as the efforts to sever right.