go 9 mostly, but at yale and that was the us and this, it was the non unable 0 the the city. there are no means of countering such weapons. today, the modern air defense system is available in the world. and the missile defense systems being built by the americans in europe do not intercept such marseilles. flooding or put and confirmed with russia used a brand new hypersonic misspelled at the west, cannot defend against in order to strike a military industrial facility in new claim. the bottom are put in issues the start warning that moscow can attack military sites and countries that allow their weapons to be used against russia in washington condemns moscow over the current escalation of the complex, but ignores the fact. it was the us that enabled your brain to conduct the long range missile strikes, which russia had warned against the

live in the russian capital. i'm rachel ruble. you're watching r t international. vladimir putin has confirmed that russia used an experimental hypersonic missile to attack a military industrial site and ukraine. the russian presidents specified that the projectile was equipped with a non nuclear warhead. he said, the missile can travel at such a high speed that it can penetrate any western air defense that i gave those young friends. if i knew that i would like to inform the personnel of the armed forces of the russian federation, citizens of our country, our friends around the world. and those who continued to harbour allusions about the possibility of inflicting a strategic defeat on russia. about the events that are taking place to day in the zone of the special military operation. namely about the use of western manufactured long range weapons on our territory. as they continued the escalation

of the west and provoked conflict in ukraine, the united states and its nato allies earlier announced that they were authorizing the use of their long range precision guided weapons systems on the territory of the russian federation. experts are well aware and the russian side has repeatedly emphasized this that it is impossible to use such weapons without the direct involvement of military specialists from the countries producing such weapons. still, on november, 19th, 6, operational technically, marseilles attack m. s. produced by the us and on november 21st and the combined miss all attack with the u. k. made storm shadow and us made hi ma systems were launched against military facilities on russian territory in the brown skin cost regions. since then, as we have repeatedly emphasized, the original conflict in ukraine previously prevailed by the west has taken on elements of global character. our air defense system has repelled these effects. as a result, the goals that were obviously set by the enemy were not achieved. a fire at the non

munition depot in debris and screeching, caused by falling debris from an attack. m. s. missile has been extinguished. there were no casualties or serious damage in the course region. an attack was made on one of the command posts of our group north as a result of the attack and the anti aircraft battle. there are unfortunately casualties that are killed and wounded among the personnel of the externally security unit and service personnel to come on to an operational stuff of the control center has not suffered any casualties and is normally directing the actions of our troops to destroy and expelled enemy units from the course region us . once again, i would like to emphasize that the use of such weapons by the enemy is not able to effect the course of combat operations in the zone of the special military operation. our troops are successfully advancing along the entire line of contact. all the tasks we have set for ourselves. would it be accomplished in response to the use of us and british long range weapons on november 21st of this year,

the russian armed forces launch to combine strike on one of ukraine's defense industry facilities. the combat conditions included a test of one of russia's newest, medium range missiles systems, in this case with a ballistic missile, with nuclear free hypersonic equipment. armies all engineers named it. originally, the test was successful. the goal of the launch was achieved and one of the largest industrial complexes known since the days of the soviet union and which still produces missile equipment and other weapons today was hit in the city of the net profit draft and ukraine. we are developing intermediate range and short arrangement styles as a response to us plants to produce and deploy intermediate range and short range missiles in europe and asia. we believe that the us made a mistake by unilaterally withdrawing from the treaty on the elimination of medium range and short range missiles in 2019 under far fetched predicts. today the united states not only produces such equipment,

but as we can see in the course of measures to train its troops. it does have worked out the issues of transporting that advancements out of systems to different regions of the world, including europe and what is more they are conducting training exercises under use . let me remind you that russia has voluntarily, unilaterally committed itself not to deploy medium range and short range missiles until us weapons of this kind are deployed in any region of the world. i repeat, we are conducting live tests of the arrest nick missile system. in response to the aggressive actions of nato countries against russia, the question of further deployment of medium and short arrangements solves, would be decided by us, depending on the actions of the united states and its satellites. we will determine the targets for further tests of our newest missile systems on the basis of threats to the security of the russian federation. we consider ourselves entitled to use our weapons against military facilities of those countries that allow their weapons to be used against our facilities. and in the event of an escalation of aggressive actions,

we will also respond decisively and in the mirror in like manner. i recommend that the ruling elite, so those countries that are planning to use the military contingents against russia seriously consider this, of course, choosing if necessary. and those are retaliatory measure of targets to be hit by such systems as auditioning on ukrainian territory. we will proactively notify civilians and also ask citizens are friendly states who are there to leave the danger zones. we will do this for humanitarian reasons, openly, publicly, without fear of opposition from the enemy, who also receive this information. why without fear? because there are no means of countering such weapons. today, these missiles attack targets at the speed of mach 10, that is 2 and a half to 3 kilometers per 2nd. the world's current air defense systems. and the missile defense system of the americans in europe do not intercept such as science . this is impossible. i emphasize once again, that it is not for russia, but the united states that have destroyed the international security system. and by continuing to fight and cling to their who generally,

they are pushing the entire world towards global conflict. we have always preferred and are now ready to resolve all contentious issues by peaceful means. but we are also ready for any development. if anyone still doubts this, it is in vain. there will always be a response to the pentagon express concerns about russia launching that new hypersonic missile and emphasized that while washington is supposedly not seeking a direct conflict with moscow, it will continue to provide supplies to key of also the white house accused rush of escalating the conflict, but dodge questions about the, about whether it was in fact, the us that instigated it, the escalation at a return at every step is coming from russia. they're the ones who are escalating this. they're the ones who started this war is because of their aggression into a summer territory. ukraine. and this war can and today you hear, say this over and over again. it can't. if russia would stop the war and stop what they're doing with their aggression. so this is an aggression from their side. for

a long time, the white house are using these long range type in missiles into russia to tie target and said russia would escalate, the war would be really invite retaliation. so why now, why change the policy now? i'm not going to get into specifics. we're going to continue to be there for ukraine. this is a president that has led on making sure ukraine has what it needs on in the battlefield. all right, let's cross now to independent us politician diane, sarah, who joins us live from orange county new york diane, we just heard there the white house accusing russia of escalating the conflict, but it was, in fact the us that green lighted ukraine using these long range missiles to strike into rush, so that got us to where we are now. what are your thoughts on that? well, i think that's correct. and frankly, i think if we want to talk about aggression,

we should go back to march april of 2022. when this entire conflict could have been and did it, the representatives of president putin and so lensky had all the ready initialed in the pages of an agreement that was negotiated and took here. and boris johnson and victoria newland have recently brag that they stopped that. so the point is, most of the damage and the depths that have occurred did not have to occur. why do you think joe biden would give approval for ukraine to use these long range missiles now after the presidential election? because we're in a transition phase in united states, of course, the administer per administration is on the way out. a trump is going to be inaugurated in about 2 months now. why now, when by the end resisted up until this point? you know, i'm not even sure biden did give these orders. i'm still looking for some official

confirmation. as recently as 2 days ago, sabrina's thing at the pentagon would not answer a question as to whether the us policy had changed. now clearly, it has changed. did bite in order this, i don't know. i think someone in the congress at this moment should be invoking the work powers resolution. article one, section 8 of our constitution says the president can not deploy a american soldiers into the possibility with another nation. and everybody in the world knows that attack them's missiles and storms, shout them as those cannot be launched or guided without american or nato troops doing it. so in a sense, it's a fallacy to say that ukraine is doing this. everyone knows that it can't be done that way or whatever, but clearly stated. and he stated this many times that russia will respond to any

escalation, any act of aggression against his country. why do you think the white house and these western leaders don't take put in seriously when he draws these red lines? you know, that's, that's something i would like to know the answer to, i really don't know. i think president putin has been very clear. he also has reference to repeatedly the history, which i think americans may not appreciate very fully of world war 2. the fact that one out of 6 russians last died in that conflict. and i can imagine that russia is not going to be very willing to accept an invasion from, from the west in that direction again and put in was very clear about that. and then he did what he said. so i think these people are a little bit drunk with their own power. a lot of them don't know history, they have other agendas, they're making a lot of money. they have

a political agenda and they seem to not really care that much about the human beings to whose lives may be very badly affected by what they're doing in moscow. and washington had a mutual agreement on intermediate range nuclear forces. that was a ball list by the us during the trump's presidency. do you think that this is a direct consequence of that? and do you see a possible restoration of that deal? certainly, when trump or turns to power. well i guess this new missile the arrest neck. uh, it's not an intercontinental ballistic missile. its a medium range missile, but you know, i don't, i don't know if what happened was affected by that. i think what russia's decision was mostly affected by the escalation and the fact that it seems to be nearly impossible to get a message through to the west. i will say this is very different than what biden

supposedly told. the cure storm or on september 14, when star, or wanted to give you crane of green light to use these muscles and bite and said no. and that's why i am actually wondering who is making the decisions. is it biden, or is that someone else on his behalf? i think that's a big question, and i think the us congress needs to get to the bottom of it. yeah, certainly is a valid question to ask. um, diane russell recently strengthened its nuclear defense doctrine, which is a move that western powers dismissed really as saber rattling up it's. it's a really terrifying thought to think about atomic weapons being used in this complex. but things continue to escalate. how likely is it you think that we could at some point get to the use of nuclear weapons? you know, i don't know. i don't know the direction that we're going. it looks unfortunately

rather likely. i know that sweden, finland, and norway just handed out a bunch of clips about how to survive a crisis toward nuclear wards. and they're only slightly less idiotic than the announcement the public service announcement made by new york city a couple years ago. telling people to just go indoors and listen to the radio. and by the way, we called the department of emergency management in new york city and said, this is absurd. no one's going to survive a nuclear war. and the person is this a joke? is this a spoof and the person in the mirrors office said, oh no, we did a lot of research. so i don't know, are people that delusional? there is a line from the british that pollutants only bluffing. you know, they had this. what did they call it? boiled the frog policy, where if you push, pretend hard enough, he'll back it down. so these are all questions, but i'm afraid if this trajectory is not broken,

then i don't want to speculate where we're headed about i, i think it's extremely dangerous for the entire human race. yeah, it's, it's certainly is very concerning, as you pointed out, these long range of weapons that ukraine has used to strike. russia certainly must be operated with the assistance by western specialist. so that does that indicate to you that natal member states are directly involved in this complex i don't see how you can say otherwise. i don't think they're being offered by mercenaries. so i think pollutants comments in that regard are well taken and should be seriously considered. and donald trump will be sworn in to office and just about 2 months. um, what do you think is likely to change once he becomes presidents? um it is it when he inherits this mess is he?

do you think he will be able to fulfill his campaign promise of ending this war as well? i think you certainly intends to. i know robert kennedy junior, who's part of this administration has been remarkably clear about the causes of this conflict. of course, he's not serving in the military capacity, but until she gathered also has been rather clear and she hopefully will be sworn in as a director of national intelligence. so i think trump would do everything he could to end this. there's a lot of less savory characters also in the administration, but he seems to be very much his own man on these things. so i think he intends to . i think he does recognize the danger even before he was sworn in back in 2017. he said, i don't need classified documents to tell me that no one survives

a nuclear war. we cannot go there. all right, diane sarah, joining us live from orange county new york. diane, thank you. thank you. so according to the russian president of the russian neck is a state of the art intermediate range, ballistic missile. it can travel up market 10 that is up to 3 kilometers per 2nd. mr. put and emphasized the advanced hypersonic project all can penetrate any defense or the senior correspondent ra guys. the reports labs, the the biggest take away as this is the or russia now has the right to strike at the country as the manufacturer. the ne solved because the specialists are involved in putting, for example, slide per item is slide pots into these miss solves and the service in them. the washer now has the right to strike a targets in these countries ways, which is why he said that this cold mixes now take it on the characteristics of

a global company. like we have 2 minutes. describe the idea shown you system, which is hypersonic, but least they can be solved with a range of thousands of columbus that can travel a $2.00 to $3.00 kilometres. the 2nd, we know, apply the me, solve seals that the united space states spent almost 2 decades building the asia pacific region in europe. and because of which it has a nation ruined relations with russia. the pop to enmity, big jobs for the united states. me, so she'll deal with that speech in unit 2008, which is where the chasm of the cracks to into a chasm. and this is russians response, essentially what vladimir said, because of your actions, because you will not lift it on restriction on far you will be solved

a $1.60 inquiry you will need to solve into russia. we have come out, we have developed and we have deployed tests that use this new me solve which you have new who against a such and stress that there is no system on the existence the can intercept the afternoon. me, sol, traveling 2 to 3000 meters per 2nd. and we saw dramatically for the publish online. uh, the various angles of that that to me. so what should i say? it is me so striking over the i the huge mush, plugged in. uh yeah, but it just thrilled. it is one of the previous defense industrial facilities. one of those same is in ukraine. it's still according to russian intelligence manufacturers, rocket parts, it's still manufacturers, munitions, it repairs,

conduct repairs of ahmed vehicles supplied by the west abrams tides. net protected charlotte decides, as well as, um, with personnel carriers from bradley is the mazda uh, infantry pricing vehicles supplied by the west to ukraine. he's destroyed damaged by rush on the front lines. they go back there for repairs. that was struck in a dramatic fashion. you could see that was me, solve the impacts of like rays of life was a little sky and bob, so i was the put a demonstration of strength, a demonstration. this isn't going to get any better that you are going to stop us and you've made yourselves more unsafe then you would before you unbox only stood and there is, there is still of course the question of why the, by the administration decide to lift these restrictions especially given the most

western weapons types. nice all types. russia has led to shoot jobs evidently. what be showing brands includes region the have they use the warehouse, the i moved up in brands the falls, the fall bulls would have been chosen for vendors that they said the, the me solves, were struck down. they didn't to achieve the same goal of destroying the storage that would serve as far as they would quickly push out. so it is again, goes to show the man who is and isn't ministration. the russian government, with the support of the people that might be added. but they are adamant that they are determined to continue the course of russia is on the stress again, that russia was the result of things peacefully. but it takes to, it takes the other side, also willing, being willing to negotiate the tool. as a result of these differences on the country,

we have seen anything but russian and russia will respond to future threats to future escalations in a married way. now vladimir booth and speeches such as this was generally a talk with you and speak. it may not be off to the public, the masses, but i can tell you that depends on all of the c i a in the white house. so they'll be sitting there, they'll be picking. so be picking this feature part. they're going to try to see what he meant. the, the games that like maybe we can have and what, what the message the take away for that or for us the public. but for them is out of it again, right. we have proven said that all names the special military operations, the objectives as will be achieved besides diseases that some people have about the strategic the fees awaiting russia. in the fields of you, craig, the piece won't come to pass,

and the pressure will continue on until the end of special military operation. all right, we can cross now to former pentagon senior security policy analyst, michael maloof, who is here with me in the r 2 studio in moscow. michael, thanks for staying with us late into the evening here in moscow, a dependent on acknowledge that a did you get an alert from russia that it would launch this new hypersonic miss? i believe it had maybe a 30 minute warning. i'm just wondering what your thoughts on what potential reaction there could have been in the pentagon at that time and, and possibly even the reaction back have. well, they had to wait and see what, what, what, what would happen with the capability of that missile would be, they knew they know the characteristics of it. but this is the 1st time. so when use operationally, it's called experimental button, which now it's being employed. operationally, it is nuclear capable. it's an intermediate range. and it's murphy means multiple warheads. those could all be new killer chipped. and what put in was doing

basically say, here's my nuclear capable missile. this whole and i'm, but i'm putting conventional warheads on it. i'm sending this now, but look, and you won't be able to stop. it goes month 1010 times the speed of sound. no way, it's going to stop this. we, there's no defense system that could stop it right now. the landscape has said that putting is ignoring calls from russia's allies, namely china and brazil, as well as the european countries in the us to de escalate. the situation is that reality is that what's really going on here? well, they have asked mr. pruitt and to begin to try to negotiate, but they also understand his position. we saw this at bricks recently, whether this was a topic of discussion and, and both china and, and, and brazil are at and even india are all members. they've all actually tried to get in to see uh to try that go state or mediate and, and zaleski is refused. it's putting who has said, look, i'm, i'm willing to negotiate, but the terms are going to get stiffer. the longer he is,

the landscape progressive of the war and it's already lost as far as i'm concerned, it's been lost. the landscape just doesn't realize it yet, but it's going to but, but it's really going to take what was solved today to really emphasize that if you continue this, this is going to get ratcheted up just as one of the. so went with murph, with mirth and worth as you said, 5 or 10 and a swarm and spread them out across the ukraine at a critical military junctures. it could decimate his entire industrial capability in the country. they won't have anything they really should, you know, stop now and, and get serious about wanting to stop this war and preserve what's left right of ukraine. because of that and, and the west is view point as well. we're going to be at it if we to,

if we don't stop putting here is just going to go into europe. there's no evidence, not 0. in fact, even put in the says, look, i don't want you print, he can't manage to print that would be insurrection or insurgency for years. and it's, but that's not what he wants to probably go to do to the neighbor river. odessa, russian speaking areas that have asked for russian assistance, that's what we're seeing. because why? because for 8 years prior to the, the special operation, the ukraine was bombing on a daily basis. some boss, the for, and little hans. the west was totally unaware of it because of the cabal of the main stream media of the government and to the tech people, keeping that infant withholding that information from the, from the us and the western public. but we were saying that we, we saw the videos for 8 years and that was 10 years and i still are bombing that's

why basically the, the regions blue hans skin and the number down bus one or 2 become autonomous. and then ask for you russian assistance to protect them. and these were russian speaking areas and putting in a bite of them. and one that we're seeing what percent is, is not gonna leave it right basic, going to annex that could even be more if zalinski continues on this path. you know, like i asked my previous guess this question, but i'd like to hear your, your perspective about moscow and washington, this mutual agreement, restrictive, intermediate rating layer forces that was a ball as to during the 1st from direct presidency. do you think that this what's happening now is a direct consequence of that and do think that it would make a difference if the both parties return to that agreement when it comes to? if trump, if now the trump has been re elected, the question is he has a history,

trump has a history of not liking international greetings by some reason. but he was listening to bolton and others at the time. i think he is wiser. now he may want to have a different perspective and given the new realities that, that he's facing. i think he will. i think he would have to consider. yeah, it's had an impact. and this is what put in was basically saying, look, it was the us, i gave up the intermediate range. that's 80025000 kilometers. um, what was that 500 to do. uh uh, i forget what it was, but it was a 3000 miles or something. so. um it, it's, um, it's a message also to, to the west. you're the ones who gave up the intermediate. we wouldn't be using these right now and, and certainly you wouldn't be allowing missiles to go into our country either because of the prior agreements that you gave up. so there's a,

i think he is sending a message it's, it's an important message. and what for the united states, it's not going to be impacted as much as the west european res would be there minutes. i mean on with hypersonic stuff. we didn't have hypersonic specs in trumps 1st administration. now russia has in china, has on the north koreans got them iran, scott, them, us hasn't gotten them yet. we don't even have a defense against it. let alone having the hyper sonics in our own inventory and, and our inventories on missiles and weapons across the board. are depleted anyway. now like because of the pre, but because of israel, we are a military industrial complex can generate them fast enough. so there's a lot has changed since trump was an office the 1st time. i'm hoping that he has a different perspective as a company and we're seeing that with the people he's bring it in. i mean, he was weighed by the name of cons, right?

he has a lot of people on his incoming administration who are anti war, which is very, very well a few of let's see if we have more of that entails gabbert was but certainly hex of is, is a very anti russian. so is that propose national security advisor who doesn't require send a confirmation, but you see trump has basically said, look, these are slots. i got a feel i will make the decisions. and that's not what biden was doing. but he was told what to do, and this is what we're saying. this will be the difference, right. and he so he surrounds himself, doesn't want yes people. but he does what i think right now the, the, when he wants around him 1st and foremost with these loyal loyalty, loyal people and, and, but, and a buddy welcomes the differences of opinions by, by others. russell recently strengthened its nuclear defense doctrine which the west was dismissed as, as sable. right? doing a single rep rattling i have a clip from this kind of gone that i want to play. let's start with some.