ons, right? yes, a lot of people and as incoming administration who are anti war, which is very, very well, a few of the few more that entails gabbert was but certainly accept this is a very anti russian. so it says that propose national security advisor who doesn't require send a confirmation. but you see trump has basically said, look, these are slots. i got a feel i will make the decisions. and that's not what binding was doing. but he was told what to do. and this is what we're saying, this will be the difference, right? and he so he surrounds himself as a might, yes people. but he does what i think right now the, the, when he wants around him 1st and foremost with these loyal loyalty, loyal people. and and, but anybody welcomes the differences of opinions by, by others, russell recently strengthened its nuclear defense doctrine which the west dismissed as, as sable rattling a single rep. rattling, i have a click from this kind of gone that i want to play this thing with them. when we

talk about and or non non nuclear and nuclear capabilities we, we certainly don't want to have, have an exchange, right? i think that i think everybody would, would agree if we, if we have to have an exchange, then we want to do it on and then we want to do it in terms that are most acceptable to the united states. so it's, it's terms that are, that are most acceptable to the united states. that puts us in a position to continue to lead the world terms that are acceptable to the united states. what are your thoughts on this as the over arching problem we're seeing today, this is the us as the what they've perceived to be the leader of the rules based order. uh, trying to hold on to that position. but we're seeing something else happening in the coming from your agent now in the global global self combined with latin

america, africa, the, the bricks, countries they, they are saying we want an alternative to this rules based order. just as us thinks it's in charge of the rules based on the can make the rules, but it can also break up. and that's what we've seen time and time again. where is the humanity in all this? why are we in, in israel, for example, why are we providing humanitarian assistance but at the same time, given israel, the bombs right. what kind of policy is that? yeah, it just, that doesn't mean i know it doesn't compute. yeah. there's, there's a, there's a conflict in policy which is, what is the strategic policy? what is a strategic vision they're trying to portray here, and they're buying investors and has not achieved that. then it still hasn't justified why we're, even in ukraine. the 1st. hm. russia has said that could perceive conducting a nuclear attack on a non nuclear power. if that aggressor is supported by nuclear powers, what are your thoughts on the possibility of atomic weapons being used and,

and is that even justifiable? i don't see it happening. i think again, i think putting is going to be limited in it. his response is not going to use nuclear weapons. in fact, even he has said that he cannot justify the use of nuclear weapons because the federation is not being threatened. the existence of the veneration has not been a few attack comes into russia. he can do with it, right. and he's been dealing with it is not most of them down. this is not, this is not constitute that direct threat. the fact that the united states and nato countries are involved in guiding these missiles, right, that is to escalate to, right. but it's, it's more um what, what, what, what the principle of the thing. and that's what we're trying to get to get away from. but the, the, the, the, the, the reality on the ground is it doesn't justify the use of nuclear weapons and that, but i think the message that he sent today, or yesterday was, was that we have the nuclear capable weapons. we're not employing burlington

employee and conventional, but we have that capability for it, so don't escalate and i think he will want to not. i think he will not want to cut off fronts options of operating once it gets it, in spite of the best efforts by biting now to, to set trump up for failure. and that this is, this is almost a concerted effort on, on the part of biting the administration and democrats to do just that. because the last thing they want is trump in office. it's incredible restraint on the side of it. and you have to say, yeah, because we're the lock and happened in 2 months. but it has said, and as you pointed out as well, that these long range weapons that you create in forces have launched into russia surely are launched with the assistance of the western powers. yes, of course they have, they have the intelligence they have. they have the guidance so that would certainly indicate that nato is directly and oh yeah, which put has said is

a red line. yeah, he did, and that's why it's now i think his response will be not to attack the westbridge, but i think he's going to just double and triple up on, on hitting it, a new crane the to force them to say uncle, we, you know, let's, let's let's talk seriously this time and be serious about it. because every day that they procrastinate, kentucky, they lose more and more more. i mean, the rush is still advancing to take over the dob us the highest regions and a spreading for the neighbor, red river. that's continuing, in spite of this lark on the part of the westgate to send some of his correct troops into the course region to do what the whole territory for to, to, to strengthen the negotiating posture. those troops have been surrounded and an isolated for the most part. they haven't killed them all yet. try to get them to surrender. but they, they're contained, they're contained, and that it was

a lark. and, and in doing that, the pull troops away from the don bus regions and, and send out their, their defense considerably. we were talking earlier and i can't remember if it was on camera or off now. but what you were saying that the democrats are looking to escalate this conflict to the point where trump has no choice, barely to continue it. where do you think things are headed and do you think that from what position will come in when he becomes president in 2 months to deescalate this and, and this for a lot of damage can occur in the next 2 months. it's strange that, that this escalation on the part of the west occurred right after the, the defeats and strange. okay. yeah. yeah. i don't believe in quincy. yeah. it's a, it's a very significant thing and it's a very, very dangerous time. and we're not only seeing the potential for escalation here, but yet, but also in israel as well as we discussed a little earlier. if not in yahoo rushing to take over the entire westbank to

me and, and that's so we have 2 front proxy wars that are, are beyond a almost beyond recall. and, and trump, i think, needs to try and constrain that and the end call a halt to a in both both the regions. the problem is at this, either one can actually create, not just the regional but a much greater conflict. because if iran is attacked by my israel, it brings in russian, china, it and, and if this, and if he could, and if the west escalates with ukraine and gets even greater and maybe let's say it introduces troops for the 1st time. that's a major escalation. it won't be a threat as such to the federation, but it will intensify the the conflict. and then in the case of your trade, trump really wants to contain that. and we've heard j, the vance. he,

he thinks all laid out to be stopped anyway. and, and, and, and a number of other folks in his administration feel the same way incoming administration feel the same way. so there's a there but, but 2 months to go and things can happen. and this is the problem that we're seeing . we don't know where it's going, we don't know what we, we don't hear what the strategy of the, by the ministration is, and already were here in the french and the in the u. k. trying to escalate it on their part in order to draw in the united states to do to do just what they just did. and that was to approve longer range missiles into russian. all right, we're going to live with our michael, the former pentagon senior security policy analysts. thank you for coming in and joining us here in the studio. thanks for him. right, well, bladder, i put in the statement comes after the russian, m o. d said it's air defense system is down to you. ok, produced a storm shadow missiles that follows the reported approval by both washington and

london for cube to use their long range weapons in strikes on russia. the kremlin says, the west is adding fuel to the fire of the conflict. in reef culture, a new escalation has occurred. this is an irresponsible position taken by the outgoing us administration. they are continuing to add fuel to the fire of the ukrainian conflict by preventing any possible dynamics for its resolution, while using ukraine as a to in the war against russia. but despite the less apparent approval for ukraine, who is this long range missiles to strike russia moscow as far as those are making strides across the front lines. here's a map comparing control of today's battlefield versus just a month ago, according to open source data from the institute for the study of war, russian troops have gained nearly 6 times more territory this year than last year. meanwhile, in the u. k, there was swift criticism over the move to allow the storm a shadow strikes. the ukraine is going to wind, frankly,

just for the beds. i the wars the enough, the the cottages, a massive a we're doing is helping to prolong a style. might the prime minister should make a statement to parliament immediately to confirm whether you k missiles have been fired into russia. he must tell the british public if this means we are now in war with the nuclear power. what risk this poses to people in britain and why this action was taken without any approval from parliament as british storm shuttle missile slam into russia? the british government announces 500000000 pound of cuts in defense capabilities. not a good look case. heritage party leader and david carts and spoke out against the crimes use of british long range missiles for attacks against russia. a stone shadow weapons used against russian territory against the wall. i would say against the wishes of most people in the u. k. who just see this is something that is going

on the ball far too long. we've talked about too many people snorted on both sides is completely unnecessary. the people want this to wind down into the escalates and to make peace and to get back to some kind of normality in the region of the world . but we have this probably minutes to now to a storm a who is the most unpopular prime minister in my memory. you know, he's only been there for 4 or 5 months, but his approval ratings have gone down through the floor. he is making bad decision off the bad decision on out the everything i'm, this is really, really terrible because this could lead to what is leading to direct conflict between the u. k and russia. because these are british missiles, which are being fired into russia, doesn't think that there is going to be a response from polluting against western nations. they see what they think that'll be a response may be against ukraine. it isn't gonna affect them. it's not going to affect them personally. the other reason is the military industrial complex and the hedge

funds based in new york and london. they've got so much invested in ukraine. they see it as a nation. they can apply them to they want to economically and next, they want to create the narrative that puts in as an aggressor. the russia is the aggressor and they're the ones that are threatening the west because you basically got to live. so they've been perpetuate thing for nearly 3 years now. one is that boots and woke up one morning and february 2022 and decided he was going to invite you crane. but not to read the background story. it goes to getting the terrible things that happened in the 8 years previous. me going right back. you have 2014, the are the fullest narrative, is that they say what you, when boots in is gonna roll these times all across the western europe, like hitler, dated and the 1940 is again, that's a complete fabrication and a complete lie. but that is what they're trying to push into the minds of people in

the west to get them to support this insane military action. an escalation of what the west is doing for the west and the, the, let's put it like that in, in ukraine so. so those are, those are the lawyers that they put up to try to try to keep this going well as cross live now to international security consultants. earl rasmussen, earl, we heard earlier in an address by rushes, president in which he said moscow would decide them potential further deployment of missiles depending on actions by the us and ukraine. do you think washington will somehow changes policy on the complex considering this morning by putting let's, let's hope so, but i, i do not with the current administration. i do notice, but in any type of policy change, you know, we've already seen that the latest, everything, every time they say they're not going to provide the approval, they provide approval. we. we've heard that about abram staying with her debt about

f. 16. we heard that about a tak homes we were did about the approval to strike into a russian territory and i don't see the current administration pulling back and that's the barry i'd be very cautious on that. and, and i think the part of that is, i think they're trying to corner and mr. trump president trump, into it, to kind of corner his foreign policy to, to shape it even before he gets in the office. and so hopefully that doesn't happen . but i think they're trying to, trying to basically, uh, uh, blackmail him or corner him, uh to, you know, lead him in a direction where he has very little options to the pentagon. said it did get a warning about this russian missile launch. do you think you crane was in any way prepared for the attacks? but i don't think. i think they may have been one divided into that. and i noticed

that president clinton said if he uses this again, he will more the ukrainians to a, especially the civilian so they can take cover and stuff. but um, but um, i think perhaps the capability, i mean tennessee caught them by surprise in the accuracy. so this is the 1st time we're actually we're, you know, we heard this basically it's the, it's a battle test type type of a new system. but they will use it again. and i think it's proven to be quite met the objectives that basically they were looking at it. i mean this, this was probably is capable of a nuclear warhead, but this was a non nuclear warhead. and i do not anticipate russia unless the status is threatened itself. i don't anticipate them escalating to a new global level. ukraine's former top general of larry zillow usually has said in a message to new recruits that they'll have little chance of survival if. if that's

the reality of things are really that bad for care of why doesn't it try to end the conflict through negotiations? well, i think there's a several different things here we've got. well, i think i think a lot of your trainings would like to have a settled. unfortunately, we've got a good powers to be. there's a, there's supporting powers in the background. a similar ones that, that scuttle the potential piece agreements back in the midst of people that are pushing for this. there's still a dreaming. um yeah, i don't know if there are a different world or something of weakening russian ultimately. and you've heard the senior political leaders talked about strategic defeat of russia. so they shape this into their own thing and they're using unfortunately, they're using ukraine as a, as a battering ram here. and it doesn't matter. they really the west could care less. some of the ukrainian side, unfortunately. and it's um, i think with

a mr. lensky there it, it seems to see these coming out quite well himself. but i think they need to think the people there need to look for a new leader. and um, and to resolve this very quickly, because otherwise, there may not be a country left in a reversal of his previous policies. zalinski originally said he could force the negotiating with russia about the crimea region. why do you think he's admitting this change in his approach to the complex? is he finally facing reality? yeah. well, it is. it's reality. i mean, we have a massive majority of the people that, that are ethnic russians there. they voted overwhelmingly to be part of russia. they actually had multiple votes ever since ukraine was became a country. they've had multiple votes to, to be independent. autonomy has to be separate, that have been basically ignored by to. yeah. so,

so there is no popular support unless you ethnically cleanse the entire crimea peninsula. there's a, there's no way that that, that is ever going to be part of your brain damage and, and there is no way that rusher will allow that to happen. it's the home of the other uh there, please that you're black um, black sci fi fleet. it's there been there for one over 200 years and they're only warm water port strategically. it is to bible of interest for, for russia. it's, it's, yeah, it's perhaps you finally waking up to reality that it will never be part of your brain. and yet there are reports about ukrainians fleeing from recruitment officers. we've seen videos in fact that well, other military judgment are abducted off the streets, pushing the buses and sent to the front lines. what does it tell you about the

state of things for kids, when it comes to the conflict? i think it's, it doesn't show a good sign at all and, and they're facing a huge um of the shortage of manpower services. uh theres discussions of even lowering the conscription age even more and including women as well. i don't see women on the front line but that they could backfill logistical supplies to support roles that uh, the devil would free up man. um it is uh, not a good sign ball and if you're grabbing people off the street, you've got people that don't understand why are we even fighting this war? and i would say that growing that the percentage is probably growing over time. and it just, it will straits, the lack of manpower in it, and that's no matter how many weapons system they have. even if the west could supply them at the rate that, that they're going through them, which i can't, i don't have the manpower to manage it. and even if you did get a number of people,

you still have to train them and they're not even getting the adequate training. mean you heard of the us a state just the other day that oh well the problem is great. doesn't have enough. no man supervisor, they need to get more man to to fight. so this is a, yeah, it is a, it's a dire situation. it's one that the, they're coming close to a complete collapse to the military from my understanding. and, and they, um, they're in a desperate situation. all right, well, have it, there are all rasmussen, irrational security consultants are all thank you. i thank you. all right and do stay with us here on our to international. we're going to take a short break and i'll be back in just a few minutes before noon by the the

me this one more to personalities. been. this just isn't, you must always displayed. moving on the, on the 2nd, but to totally out of me and give them the say the most value of what we have done most scale it will by he really is he looking to be able to do with it. but the issue, the most, the i will give you the g a little guy enough. are you the other day you get enough to go and, and even throw both of them good for the saw the the level of again the go into is the guy that sheet of going to get that it was saying was when will be i know me they've been dealing with nearly money visits you own in space, so it on the way down could have been yeah, the letter was just the bundle that they go on is could they will gasket on monday? did you want to go to some community dock? a part of this you by law got one and people she's to go. mean he goes empty. i'm the, i mean the must have gone through. yeah, we

a multi danielle and she be the be i one of all the go on beyond what he did not turn on, but kick was it, give him a go down to see what will be the the, the, the this is gathering of the g 20 reflected strikingly different world views, the west and drone don about

a 2 queen proxy warrants the rest of the global south focused on international stability and he cannot make prospect the law. so excuse me, get the police do is when you play with the dc plus somebody that's doing the the punch. so unless i do it that i'm listening with somebody with the the,

the, and 1492 this evening, christopher columbus, rates to the bahamas and discover the new world for europe. the wealth of america and its fast territories. cosby envy of the europeans, especially the spaniards and the portuguese. they sought after taking over these lands. however, there lived indigenous peoples with a high culture and their own nation, who was their barbaric colonization of america, which went down in history under the name of country stuff lasted for more than 100 years. 101521 care design. cortez is done with doors captured and destroyed the capital of the aztec empire. daniels practically massacring the local population. following them, francisco pizarro is gun case. the doors destroyed the inc and fire. as

a result of spanish aggression, the ancient maya civilization collapse, suppressing the resistance of the indians. the invaders carried out mass executions . the horrendous genocide was aggravated by the diseases that the europeans had brought to america. the number of the indigenous population decreased at 16 times from 25. so one and a half 1000000 people from keystone became one of the largest demographic disaster fees of mankind and remains an indelible bloody stain in the history of the european colonial empires. the russian states never, i've side as one of the most sense community invest all sense and the same assistance must be the one else

holes. question about this, even though we will then in the european union, the kremlin media mission, the state on the russians coding and split the r t spoke neck, keeping our video agency roughly all the band on youtube, the student services question. did you say stephen twist, which is the a lot of all americans today are on forces joined our nato allies in air strikes against the serbian forces, the, the guy village spread through us with that movie. we still, for we conclude, disregarding a fan base is of the nation,

which is reinforced with the depleted uranium that has a special capacity to pay the trade from a new car safety point of view. there is no radiological, the or even and nothing is significant consequences. the, the symmetry seems endless. a real city of the dead, where it's very easy to get lost. similar graveyards now exist in iraq and afghanistan. they may soon appear in ukraine with thousands of square kilometers of already being contaminated with deadly dust. for the next 4 and a half 1000000000 years the, cuz i don't know it's not so someone that just didn't want to say i'm on this funding basis to fall

under the guise of evacuation about 50000 people were transported the main purpose of this concentration camp in bella rose was doing think prisoners was time for us and use them as a human shield against the advancing. so it'd be it on me. getting my own but silly and slipped into phone. you put them in the sky when it was in love with like you can pick up to the ship your stuff up and stuff like that, but don't want to bring your name the i'm so sorry i missed cuz that your certificate seems to be put aside and that's just, you know, it's easy use people is biological weapons leaving them to perish without food, water, motion to the door. small it there. if you're a deity, so couldn't they knew who lives out there with you for the small to the can you put the intrinsic nation weight loose display is usually a ship for them to move the cam gloucester 10 days or what else made it drastically

defense from of accounts of the 3rd rice watch on t. the if you think about russia, what does your mind picture the landscapes open up before your eyes? the last one does you imagine the, the discounts dodge the journey? the, the, you read to come along the,

the, the, there are no means of countering such weapons. today, the modern air defense system is available in the world. and the missile defense systems being built by the americans in europe do not intercept such marseilles. flooding or put and confirmed with russia used a brand new, hypertonic nestle just the west, cannot defend the guns in order to strike a military industrial facility in new printing. let them are put in issues and start warning that moscow can attack military sites and countries that allow their weapons to be used against prussia and washington condemns moscow over the current escalation of the conflict, but ignores the fact. it was the us that enabled ukraine to conduct the long range missile strikes which russia had borne.